1
|
Crick JP, Rethorn TJ, Beauregard TA, Summers R, Rethorn ZD, Quatman-Yates CC. The Use of Quality Improvement in the Physical Therapy Literature: A Scoping Review. J Healthc Qual 2023; 45:280-296. [PMID: 37428943 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quality improvement (QI) is a useful methodology for improving healthcare, often through iterative changes. There is no prior review on the application of QI in physical therapy (PT). PURPOSE AND RELEVANCE To characterize and evaluate the quality of the QI literature in PT. METHODS We searched four electronic databases from inception through September 1, 2022. Included publications focused on QI and included the practice of PT. Quality was assessed using the 16-point QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) appraisal tool. RESULTS Seventy studies were included in the review, 60 of which were published since 2014 with most ( n = 47) from the United States. Acute care ( n = 41) was the most prevalent practice setting. Twenty-two studies (31%) did not use QI models or approaches and only nine studies referenced Revised Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. The median QI-MQCS score was 12 (range 7-15). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS Quality improvement publications in the PT literature are increasing, yet there is a paucity of QI studies pertaining to most practice settings and a lack of rigor in project design and reporting. Many studies were of low-to-moderate quality and did not meet minimum reporting standards. We recommend use of models, frameworks, and reporting guidelines to improve methodologic rigor and reporting.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bennett PN, Kohzuki M, Bohm C, Roshanravan B, Bakker SJL, Viana JL, MacRae JM, Wilkinson TJ, Wilund KR, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Sakkas GK, Mustata S, Fowler K, McDonald J, Aleamañy GM, Anding K, Avin KG, Escobar GL, Gabrys I, Goth J, Isnard M, Jhamb M, Kim JC, Li JW, Lightfoot CJ, McAdams-DeMarco M, Manfredini F, Meade A, Molsted S, Parker K, Seguri-Orti E, Smith AC, Verdin N, Zheng J, Zimmerman D, Thompson S. Global Policy Barriers and Enablers to Exercise and Physical Activity in Kidney Care. J Ren Nutr 2022; 32:441-449. [PMID: 34393071 PMCID: PMC10505947 DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2021.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Impairment in physical function and physical performance leads to decreased independence and health-related quality of life in people living with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease. Physical activity and exercise in kidney care are not priorities in policy development. We aimed to identify global policy-related enablers, barriers, and strategies to increase exercise participation and physical activity behavior for people living with kidney disease. DESIGN AND METHODS Guided by the Behavior Change Wheel theoretical framework, 50 global renal exercise experts developed policy barriers and enablers to exercise program implementation and physical activity promotion in kidney care. The consensus process consisted of developing themes from renal experts from North America, South America, Continental Europe, United Kingdom, Asia, and Oceania. Strategies to address enablers and barriers were identified by the group, and consensus was achieved. RESULTS We found that policies addressing funding, service provision, legislation, regulations, guidelines, the environment, communication, and marketing are required to support people with kidney disease to be physically active, participate in exercise, and improve health-related quality of life. We provide a global perspective and highlight Japanese, Canadian, and other regional examples where policies have been developed to increase renal physical activity and rehabilitation. We present recommendations targeting multiple stakeholders including nephrologists, nurses, allied health clinicians, organizations providing renal care and education, and renal program funders. CONCLUSIONS We strongly recommend the nephrology community and people living with kidney disease take action to change policy now, rather than idly waiting for indisputable clinical trial evidence that increasing physical activity, strength, fitness, and function improves the lives of people living with kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul N Bennett
- Medical and Clinical Affairs, Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, California; Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Masahiro Kohzuki
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai City, Japan
| | - Clara Bohm
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Stephan J L Bakker
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center MC Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - João L Viana
- Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, University Institute of Maia, Maia, Portugal
| | - Jennifer M MacRae
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Kenneth R Wilund
- Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
| | | | - Giorgos K Sakkas
- Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK and University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
| | - Stefan Mustata
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Jamie McDonald
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Kirsten Anding
- Nephrology, KfH Nierenzentrum Bischofswerda, Bischofswerda, Germany
| | - Keith G Avin
- Indiana University Department of Physical Therapy, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Gabriela Leal Escobar
- Department of Nephrology Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Iwona Gabrys
- University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jill Goth
- Programs & Public Policy, The Kidney Foundation of Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Jun Chul Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Gumi Medical Center, CHA University, Gumi, Republic of Korea
| | - John Wing Li
- Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Katoomba, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Fabio Manfredini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Surgical specialties, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Eva Seguri-Orti
- Department of Physiotherapy, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alice C Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Jing Zheng
- School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong L, Duque G, McMahon LP. Sarcopenia and Frailty: Challenges in Mainstream Nephrology Practice. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:2554-2564. [PMID: 34622096 PMCID: PMC8484128 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcopenia and frailty are prevalent in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. Sarcopenia is characterised by the loss of muscle mass and function, while frailty is defined as a multi-system impairment associated with increased vulnerability to stressors. There is substantial overlap between the 2 conditions, particularly with regards to physical aspects: low grip strength, gait speed and low muscle mass. Both sarcopenia and frailty have been associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Although there is no recommended pharmacological treatment as yet, it is widely accepted that exercise training and nutritional supplementation are the key interventions to maintain skeletal muscle mass and strength. This review aims to present a comprehensive overview of sarcopenia and frailty in patients with CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limy Wong
- Eastern Health Integrated Renal Service, Box Hill Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Renal Medicine, Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gustavo Duque
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St. Albans, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine-Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, St. Albans, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lawrence P McMahon
- Eastern Health Integrated Renal Service, Box Hill Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Renal Medicine, Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Castillo G, Presseau J, Wilson M, Cook C, Field B, Garg AX, McIntyre C, Molnar AO, Hogeterp B, Thornley M, Thompson S, MacRae JM, Bohm C. Addressing feasibility challenges to delivering intradialytic exercise interventions: A theory-informed qualitative study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 37:558-574. [PMID: 34415351 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intradialytic exercise (IDE) may improve physical function and health-related quality of life. However, incorporating IDE into standard hemodialysis care has been slow due to feasibility challenges. We conducted a multicenter qualitative feasibility study to identify potential barriers and enablers to IDE and generate potential solutions to these factors. METHODS We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and patients across twelve hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework and directed content analysis to analyze the data. RESULTS We identified eight relevant domains (knowledge, skills, beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, environmental context and resources, goals, social/professional role and identity, and social influences) represented by three overarching categories: 1) Knowledge, skills and expectations: lack of staff expertise to oversee exercise, uncertainty regarding exercise risks, benefits, and patient interest, lack of knowledge regarding exercise eligibility; 2) Human, material and logistical resources: staff concerns regarding workload, perception that exercise professionals should supervise IDE; space, equipment, and scheduling conflict concerns; 3) Social dynamics of the unit: local champions and patient stories contribute to IDE sustainability.We developed a list of actionable solutions by mapping barriers and enablers to behavior change techniques. We also developed a feasibility checklist of 47 questions identifying key factors to address prior to IDE launch. CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based solutions to identified barriers and enablers to IDE and a feasibility checklist may help recruit and support units, staff, and patients and address key challenges to the delivery of IDE in diverse clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisell Castillo
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Mackenzie Wilson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Charles Cook
- Transplant Ambassador Program, Grand River Hospital, Kitchener, Ontario
| | - Bonnie Field
- Patient and Family Advisory Committee, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario
| | - Amit X Garg
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario
| | - Christopher McIntyre
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario
| | - Amber O Molnar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
| | - Betty Hogeterp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario
| | - Michelle Thornley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario
| | - Stephanie Thompson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Jennifer M MacRae
- Cumming School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Clara Bohm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parker K, Bennett PN, Tayler C, Lee C, MacRae J. Reasons for Nonparticipation in a Sustained Hemodialysis Intradialytic Exercise Program. J Ren Nutr 2021; 31:421-426. [PMID: 33642193 DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) Patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring hemodialysis suffer frailty and poor physical function. Exercise can improve physical function; however, barriers exist to intradialytic exercise programs. The objective of this study was to explore patients' reasons for not exercising in an extant intradialytic exercise program. DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis reporting the reasons for not exercising in an intradialytic exercise program in two hemodialysis centers over a 4-week period. We explored whether patient characteristics and the presence of an exercise professional were associated with missed exercise sessions. RESULTS Seventy-five patients participating in the intradialytic exercise program completed 57% of prescribed intradialytic exercise sessions. The three most frequently reported reasons from patients not exercising were refusal (24%), followed by fatigue (19%) and symptoms (14%). Patients were more than twice as likely to exercise if a kinesiologist was present (odds ratio [OR]: 2.26, confidence interval [CI]: 1.5, 3.4 P = .03). They were less likely to exercise if they were women (OR: 0.66, CI: 0.45, 0.95 P = .002), had been on dialysis greater than 60 months (OR: 0.55, CI: 0.37, 0.80 P < .002), or had more than two comorbid conditions (OR: 0.63, CI: 0.43, 0.90, P = .01). CONCLUSION Patient adherence to intradialytic exercise programs is strongly associated with the presence of exercise professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul N Bennett
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, California.
| | - Cassandra Tayler
- School of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Chel Lee
- Department of Mathematics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer MacRae
- Division of Nephrology and Department of Cardiac Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harhay MN, Rao MK, Woodside KJ, Johansen KL, Lentine KL, Tullius SG, Parsons RF, Alhamad T, Berger J, Cheng XS, Lappin J, Lynch R, Parajuli S, Tan JC, Segev DL, Kaplan B, Kobashigawa J, Dadhania DM, McAdams-DeMarco MA. An overview of frailty in kidney transplantation: measurement, management and future considerations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:1099-1112. [PMID: 32191296 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The construct of frailty was first developed in gerontology to help identify older adults with increased vulnerability when confronted with a health stressor. This article is a review of studies in which frailty has been applied to pre- and post-kidney transplantation (KT) populations. Although KT is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), KT candidates often must overcome numerous health challenges associated with ESKD before receiving KT. After KT, the impacts of surgery and immunosuppression represent additional health stressors that disproportionately impact individuals with frailty. Frailty metrics could improve the ability to identify KT candidates and recipients at risk for adverse health outcomes and those who could potentially benefit from interventions to improve their frail status. The Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP) is the most commonly used frailty metric in ESKD research, and KT recipients who are frail at KT (~20% of recipients) are twice as likely to die as nonfrail recipients. In addition to the PFP, many other metrics are currently used to assess pre- and post-KT vulnerability in research and clinical practice, underscoring the need for a disease-specific frailty metric that can be used to monitor KT candidates and recipients. Although frailty is an independent risk factor for post-transplant adverse outcomes, it is not factored into the current transplant program risk-adjustment equations. Future studies are needed to explore pre- and post-KT interventions to improve or prevent frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera N Harhay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Tower Health Transplant Institute, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA, USA
| | - Maya K Rao
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Stefan G Tullius
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tarek Alhamad
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joseph Berger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - XingXing S Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Raymond Lynch
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jane C Tan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Vice President System Office, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, USA
| | - Jon Kobashigawa
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Darshana M Dadhania
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McAdams-DeMarco MA, Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Chu NM, Agoons D, Parsons RF, Alhamad T, Johansen KL, Tullius SG, Lynch R, Harhay MN, Rao MK, Berger J, Cooper M, Tan JC, Cheng XS, Woodside KJ, Parajuli S, Lentine KL, Kaplan B, Segev DL, Kobashigawa JA, Dadhania D. Perceptions and Practices Regarding Frailty in Kidney Transplantation: Results of a National Survey. Transplantation 2020; 104:349-356. [PMID: 31343576 PMCID: PMC6834867 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the potential utility of frailty, a clinical phenotype of decreased physiologic reserve and resistance to stressors, to predict postkidney transplant (KT) outcomes, we sought to understand the perceptions and practices regarding frailty measurement in US KT programs. METHODS Surveys were emailed to American Society of Transplantation Kidney/Pancreas Community of Practice members and 202 US transplant programs (November 2017 to April 2018). Program characteristics were gleaned from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. RESULTS The 133 responding programs (response rate = 66%) represented 77% of adult KTs and 79% of adult KT candidates in the United States. Respondents considered frailty to be a useful concept in evaluating candidacy (99%) and endorsed a need to develop a frailty measurement specific to KT (92%). Frailty measurement was more common during candidacy evaluation (69%) than during KT admission (28%). Of the 202 programs, 38% performed frailty assessments in all candidates while 23% performed assessments only for older candidates. There was heterogeneity in the frailty assessment method; 18 different tools were utilized to measure frailty. The most common tool was a timed walk test (19%); 67% reported performing >1 tool. Among programs that measure frailty, 53% reported being less likely to list frail patients for KT. CONCLUSIONS Among US KT programs, frailty is recognized as a clinically relevant construct and is commonly measured at evaluation. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in the tools used to measure frailty. Efforts to identify optimal measurement of frailty using either an existing or a novel tool and subsequent standardization of its measurement and application across KT programs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Nadia M Chu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dayawa Agoons
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tarek Alhamad
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Stefan G Tullius
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Raymond Lynch
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Meera N Harhay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Maya K Rao
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Berger
- Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Jane C Tan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - XingXing S Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Kenneth J Woodside
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Darshana Dadhania
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kobashigawa J, Dadhania D, Bhorade S, Adey D, Berger J, Bhat G, Budev M, Duarte-Rojo A, Dunn M, Hall S, Harhay MN, Johansen KL, Joseph S, Kennedy CC, Kransdorf E, Lentine KL, Lynch RJ, McAdams-DeMarco M, Nagai S, Olymbios M, Patel J, Pinney S, Schaenman J, Segev DL, Shah P, Singer LG, Singer JP, Sonnenday C, Tandon P, Tapper E, Tullius SG, Wilson M, Zamora M, Lai JC. Report from the American Society of Transplantation on frailty in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:984-994. [PMID: 30506632 PMCID: PMC6433498 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
A consensus conference on frailty in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and endorsed by the American Society of Nephrology (ASN), the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS), and the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) took place on February 11, 2018 in Phoenix, Arizona. Input from the transplant community through scheduled conference calls enabled wide discussion of current concepts in frailty, exploration of best practices for frailty risk assessment of transplant candidates and for management after transplant, and development of ideas for future research. A current understanding of frailty was compiled by each of the solid organ groups and is presented in this paper. Frailty is a common entity in patients with end-stage organ disease who are awaiting organ transplantation, and affects mortality on the waitlist and in the posttransplant period. The optimal methods by which frailty should be measured in each organ group are yet to be determined, but studies are underway. Interventions to reverse frailty vary among organ groups and appear promising. This conference achieved its intent to highlight the importance of frailty in organ transplantation and to plant the seeds for further discussion and research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Deborah Adey
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Berger
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Geetha Bhat
- Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Evan Kransdorf
- Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jignesh Patel
- Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Palak Shah
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stefan G. Tullius
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer C. Lai
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ortiz A, Sanchez-Niño MD. Sarcopenia in CKD: a roadmap from basic pathogenetic mechanisms to clinical trials. Clin Kidney J 2019; 12:110-112. [PMID: 30746137 PMCID: PMC6366131 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcopenia and frailty are recognized as key risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on renal replacement therapy or with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is still debate about their pathogenesis and, thus, about the best therapeutic approaches, as well as the impact on outcomes of current approaches based on different exercise programmes. In the past two issues of Clinical Kidney Journal, several manuscripts address the issue of sarcopenia in CKD from the point of view of pathogenesis and new therapeutic approaches, monitoring of results, implementation of exercise programmes and specific potential benefits of exercise programmes in dialysis and non-dialysis CKD patients, as assessed by clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Ortiz
- IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid; Fundacion Renal Iñigo Alvarez de Toledo-IRSIN and REDINREN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Dolores Sanchez-Niño
- IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid; Fundacion Renal Iñigo Alvarez de Toledo-IRSIN and REDINREN, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Young HML, Jeurkar S, Churchward DR, Dungey M, Stensel DJ, Bishop NC, Greenwood SA, Singh SJ, Smith AC, Burton JO. Implementing a theory-based intradialytic exercise programme in practice: a quality improvement project. Clin Kidney J 2018; 11:832-840. [PMID: 30524718 PMCID: PMC6275440 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfy050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research evidence outlines the benefits of intradialytic exercise (IDE), yet implementation into practice has been slow, ostensibly due to a lack of patient and staff engagement. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve patient outcomes via the introduction of an IDE programme, evaluate patient uptake and sustainability and enhance the engagement of routine haemodialysis (HD) staff with the delivery of the IDE programme. METHODS We developed and refined an IDE programme, including interventions designed to increase patient and staff engagement that were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), using a series of 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' (PDSA) cycles. The programme was introduced at two UK National Health Service HD units. Process measures included patient uptake, withdrawals, adherence and HD staff involvement. Outcome measures were patient-reported functional capacity, anxiety, depression and symptomology. All measures were collected over 12 months. RESULTS A total of 95 patients were enrolled in the IDE programme; 64 (75%) were still participating at 3 months, decreasing to 41 (48%) at 12 months. Adherence was high (78%) at 3 months, decreasing to 63% by 12 months. The provision of IDE by HD staff accounted for a mean of 2 (5%) sessions per 3-month time point. Patients displayed significant improvements in functional ability (P = 0.01) and a reduction in depression (P = 0.02) over 12 months, but the effects seen were limited to those who completed the programme. CONCLUSIONS A theory-based IDE programme is feasible and leads to improvement in functional capacity and depression. Sustaining IDE over time is complicated by high levels of patient withdrawal from the programme. Significant change at an organizational level is required to enhance sustainability by increasing HD staff engagement or access to professional exercise support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M L Young
- Leicester Kidney Exercise Team, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation and John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Sushant Jeurkar
- Physiotherapy Department, Addenbrooks Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Darren R Churchward
- Leicester Kidney Exercise Team, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation and John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Maurice Dungey
- National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - David J Stensel
- National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Nicolette C Bishop
- National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Sharlene A Greenwood
- Department of Physiotherapy and Renal Medicine, King’s College Hospital and Department of Renal Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sally J Singh
- Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, Leicester Biomedical Research Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alice C Smith
- Leicester Kidney Exercise Team, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation and John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - James O Burton
- Leicester Kidney Exercise Team, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation and John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Regolisti G, Maggiore U, Sabatino A, Gandolfini I, Pioli S, Torino C, Aucella F, Cupisti A, Pistolesi V, Capitanini A, Caloro G, Gregorini M, Battaglia Y, Mandreoli M, Dani L, Mosconi G, Bellizzi V, Di Iorio BR, Conti P, Fiaccadori E. Interaction of healthcare staff's attitude with barriers to physical activity in hemodialysis patients: A quantitative assessment. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0196313. [PMID: 29702702 PMCID: PMC5922547 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim of the study In hemodialysis patients, sedentarism is a potentially modifiable mortality risk factor. We explored whether healthcare staff’s attitude towards exercise interacts with patient-perceived barriers in modifying the level of physical activity in this population. Methods In this prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study we recruited 608 adult patients and 330 members of the healthcare staff in 16 hemodialysis units in Italy. We assessed patient-perceived barriers to, and healthcare staff’s attitude towards, exercise by specific questionnaires. We fitted multilevel linear models to analyze the relationships of either barriers or staff’s attitude, and their interaction, with a measure of patient self-reported physical activity (the Human Activity Profile–Adjusted Activity Score [HAP-AAS]), adjusting for multiple confounders. We also employed latent class analysis to dichotomize patients into those endorsing or not endorsing barriers. Results Most barriers were negatively associated with the HAP-AAS (adjusted change attributable to a given barrier ranging between -5.1 [“Feeling too old”, 95% Confidence Interval: -9.4 to -0.8] and -15.6 [“Ulcers on legs and feet”, 95%CI: -24.8 to -6.5]. We found a significant interaction between staff’s attitude and barriers (adjusted P values ranging between 0.03 [“I do not believe that it is physician’s or nurse’s role providing advice on exercise to patients on dialysis”] and 0.001 [“I do not often ask patients about exercise”]). A beneficial effect of a proactive staff’s attitude was evident only in patients not endorsing barriers. Conclusions Barriers and non-proactive staff’s attitude reduce physical activity in hemodialysis patients. Patients not endorsing barriers benefit the most from a proactive staff’s attitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Regolisti
- Unità di Fisiopatologia dell’Insufficienza Renale, and Scuola di Specializzazione in Nefrologia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Unità di Fisiopatologia dell’Insufficienza Renale, and Scuola di Specializzazione in Nefrologia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
- Centro Trapianti Rene-Pancreas, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alice Sabatino
- Unità di Fisiopatologia dell’Insufficienza Renale, and Scuola di Specializzazione in Nefrologia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Gandolfini
- Unità di Fisiopatologia dell’Insufficienza Renale, and Scuola di Specializzazione in Nefrologia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
- Centro Trapianti Rene-Pancreas, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | - Filippo Aucella
- Nefrologia e Dialisi, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Adamasco Cupisti
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lucia Dani
- Nefrologia e Dialisi, San Miniato, Empoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Conti
- Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Nefrologia e Dialisi, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Enrico Fiaccadori
- Unità di Fisiopatologia dell’Insufficienza Renale, and Scuola di Specializzazione in Nefrologia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
- Centro Trapianti Rene-Pancreas, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|