Late Onset Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency Triggered by an Acute Increase in Protein Intake: A Review of 10 Cases Reported in the Literature

While the urea cycle disorders (UCDs) classically present in the neonatal stage, they have become increasingly recognized as a rare cause of unexplained hyperammonemic encephalopathy in adults. Many metabolic triggers for late-onset UCDs have been described in the literature including excessive protein intake. In this case series, ten such documented cases are reviewed with analysis of patient demographic, protein load, treatment course, and patient outcome. Common delays in treatment include recognition of hyperammonemia as the cause of encephalopathy and initiation of hemodialysis. In only one case was a diet history used to raise suspicion for a metabolic derangement. Metabolic disorders remain an important consideration in adults presenting with encephalopathy not explained by more common etiologies, and recent and remote dietary history may provide valuable information.

Inherited metabolic disorders and cerebral infarction

The association of genetic factors and cerebral infarction (CI) has long been established. A positive family history alone is a recognized risk factor for CI and vascular events in general. However, there are certain inherited conditions that further increase the risk of stroke. These conditions are generally metabolic and mitochondrial genetic defects that have variable modes of inheritance. This article reviews major inherited metabolic disorders that predispose an individual to CI. Ten main conditions will be discussed: Fabry's disease, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, tangier disease, familial hypercholesterolemia, homocystinuria, methylmalonic acidemia, glutaric aciduria type I, propionic acidemia, ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency and mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like phenomenon.

Current role of liver transplantation for the treatment of urea cycle disorders: a review of the worldwide English literature and 13 cases at Kyoto University

To address the current role of liver transplantation (LT) for urea cycle disorders (UCDs), we reviewed the worldwide English literature on the outcomes of LT for UCD as well as 13 of our own cases of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for UCD. The total number of cases was 51, including our 13 cases. The overall cumulative patient survival rate is presumed to be more than 90% at 5 years. Most of the surviving patients under consideration are currently doing well with satisfactory quality of life. One advantage of LDLT over deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is the opportunity to schedule surgery, which beneficially affects neurological consequences. Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) is no longer considered significant for the establishment of gene therapies or hepatocyte transplantation but plays a significant role in improving living liver donor safety; this is achieved by reducing the extent of the hepatectomy, which avoids right liver donation. Employing heterozygous carriers of the UCDs as donors in LDLT was generally acceptable. However, male hemizygotes with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD) must be excluded from donor candidacy because of the potential risk of sudden-onset fatal hyperammonemia. Given this possibility as well as the necessity of identifying heterozygotes for other disorders, enzymatic and/or genetic assays of the liver tissues in cases of UCDs are essential to elucidate the impact of using heterozygous carrier donors on the risk or safety of LDLT donor-recipient pairs. In conclusion, LT should be considered to be the definitive treatment for UCDs at this stage, although some issues remain unresolved.

Living donor liver transplantation for pediatric patients with inheritable metabolic disorders

Forty-six pediatric patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using parental liver grafts for inheritable metabolic disorders (IMD) were evaluated to determine the outcomes of the surgery, decisive factors for post-transplant patient survival and the impact of using donors who were heterozygous for the particular disorder. Disorders included Wilson disease (WD, n = 21), ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD, n = 6), tyrosinemia type I (TTI, n = 6), glycogen storage disease (GSD, n = 4), propionic acidemia (PPA, n = 3), methylmalonic acidemia (MMA, n = 2), Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I (CNSI, n = 2), bile acid synthetic defect (BASD, n = 1) and erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP, n = 1). The post-transplant cumulative patient survival rates were 86.8 and 81.2% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Post-transplant patient survival and recovery of the growth retardation were significantly better in the liver-oriented diseases (WD, OTCD, TTI, CNSI and BASD) than in the non-liver-oriented diseases (GSD, PPA, MMA and EPP) and pre-transplant growth retardation disadvantageously affected post-transplant outcomes. Although 40 of 46 donors were considered heterozygous for each disorder, neither mortality nor morbidity related to the heterozygosis has been observed. LDLT using parental donors can be recommended as an effective treatment for pediatric patients with IMD. In the non-liver-oriented diseases, however, satisfactory outcomes were not obtained by hepatic replacement alone.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Noncirrhotic Inheritable Metabolic Liver Diseases: Impact of the Use of Heterozygous Donors

BACKGROUND

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the liver donor is almost always a blood relative; therefore, the donor is sometimes a heterozygous carrier of inheritable diseases. The use of such carriers as donors has not been validated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of LDLT for noncirrhotic inheritable metabolic liver disease (NCIMLD) to clarify the effects of using a heterozygous carrier as a donor.

METHODS

Between June 1990 and December 2003, 21 patients with NCIMLD underwent LDLT at our institution. The indications for LDLT included type II citrullinemia (n = 7), ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (n = 6), propionic acidemia (n = 3), Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I (n = 2), methylmalonic acidemia (n = 2), and familial amyloid polyneuropathy (n = 1). Of these 21 recipients, six underwent auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation.

RESULTS

The cumulative survival rate of the recipients was 85.7% at both 1 and 5 years after operation. All surviving recipients are currently doing well without sequelae of the original diseases, including neurological impairments or physical growth retardation. Twelve of the 21 donors were considered to be heterozygous carriers based on the modes of inheritance of the recipients' diseases and preoperative donor medical examinations. All donors were uneventfully discharged from the hospital and have been doing well since discharge. No mortality or morbidity related to the use of heterozygous donors was observed in donors or recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the use of heterozygous donors in LDLT for NCIMLD has no negative impact on either donors or recipients, although some issues remain unsolved and should be evaluated in further studies.

How reliable is the allopurinol load in detecting carriers for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency?

The allopurinol test aims to distinguish carriers and noncarriers for ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency. We have evaluated the reliability of the test in at-risk females of known genotype. Results based on urine orotidine and/or orotic acid measurement were compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Retrospectively, we analysed the results of allopurinol tests in 42 women (22 confirmed heterozygotes and 20 noncarriers) from 23 pedigrees at risk of being carriers for OTC deficiency. Using a cut-off of 2 standard deviations above the mean of controls, the highest sensitivity (91%) was given by orotidine alone or in combination with orotic acid, but specificity was only 70% and 65%, respectively. We conclude that the value of the allopurinol test for detecting OTC carriers in at-risk females is limited. This needs to be recognized when counselling families. The test still has a role as a safe, quick, noninvasive screen of individuals at risk, but test results in possible carriers should be interpreted with caution. In the absence of other supportive evidence, confirmation by mutation analysis is required.

Remark on utility and error rates of the allopurinol test in detecting mild ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency

Carriers of X-linked ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD) are themselves mildly affected. The allopurinol test is quite sensitive (92.7%) and very specific in detecting these carriers. Consequently, it has also been recommended for the diagnosis of mild OTCD in the general population. However, there is a controversy on its utility since OTCD could not be demonstrated in several patients with positive test results but negative family histories. We show that this controversy is due to an improper use of statistical concepts, i.e., to the postulate of a specificity of "100%," and to the confusion of specificity with type I error rate. Spontaneous orotic aciduria implies a positive allopurinol test and limits the specificity of the test to a maximum of 99.7%. Therefore, according to Bayes' theorem, almost all positive test results in the general population must turn out to be type I errors, due to the minute prevalence (1/32,000) of mild OTCD (i.e., asymptomatic carriers and male patients with inapparent disease). Family history seems to be the only preselective parameter that can sufficiently raise the prevalence in the group to be tested. Bayesian analysis also yields the rate of type II errors (OTCD inspite of a negative test) which is high in closely related at-risk females (22.6% in mothers of male patients) but minimal in the general population. Conclusion. The allopurinol test is useful for the exclusion but not for the diagnosis of inapparent OTCD in sporadic individuals. Test results in possible carriers should be interpreted with caution.

Ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency: improved sensitivity of testing for protein tolerance in the diagnosis of heterozygotes

The most direct test of functional capacity of the liver in nitrogen disposal is to stress the urea cycle with a high protein load. This has been used in the diagnosis of heterozygosity for ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency for many years by measuring the subsequent excretion of orotic acid in urine. Reports have shown some ambiguity in both this and the more recent allopurinol test. We investigated the effects of different foods as the protein load and of different analytical methods. A standardized protocol was developed, giving 35 g protein per m2 surface area as steamed fat-free chicken breast to be eaten within 30 min. Urine was collected at zero time and over 0-2, 2-4 and 4-6 h. Compliance was checked by assessing excretion of amino acids. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved by reference to the change in excretion, i.e. the ratio of excretions 2-4 h/0-2 h. Extension of the test to 6 h gave no diagnostic advantage over a 4 h test. Comparison of the analysis of total orotic acids by the photometric method of Harris and Oberholtzer, the reference method for this study, with that by the method of Goldstein and colleagues showed that the latter gave erratic results with some false positives. However, comparison of the method of Harris and Oberholtzer with specific orotic acid analysis by a modification of the stable-isotope internal standard method of Rimoldi and colleagues yielded the same diagnoses. The improved protein load test gave a clearly positive result in all 16 obligate heterozygotes and 2 possible heterozygotes tested from 14 kindred, and a clearly negative result in all 18 control subjects and all 6 of the possible heterozygotes who were later shown by DNA studies not to carry the family mutation. The test appears at least as sensitive and specific as the allopurinol test, and is more convenient because of the short period of sample collection.

Laboratory evaluation of urea cycle disorders

The urea cycle disorders (UCDs) represent a group of inherited metabolic diseases with hyperammonemia as the primary laboratory abnormality. Affected individuals may become comatose or die if not treated rapidly. Diagnosis of a UCD requires a high index of suspicion and judicious use of the laboratory. It is important to rule out other conditions causing hyperammonemia that may require different treatment. The astute clinician may suspect a specific UCD in the appropriate clinical setting, but only laboratory results can confirm a specific diagnosis. The importance of the laboratory in helping the clinician to differentiate among various causes of hyperammonemia, in confirming a specific UCD, in carrier testing, and in prenatal diagnostic testing is highlighted in this review.

Influence of dose and age on the response of the allopurinol test for ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency in control infants

Measurement of urinary orotidine and orotic acid after an oral allopurinol challenge is an important diagnostic test for ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency that is sometimes used in infants (< 1 year of age), although there is little information on normal test results in this age group. We found higher orotidine excretion in normal infants than in older children given the test, whereas orotate excretion was similar in both groups. The increased orotidine excretion appears to be due to the use in the infants of higher allopurinol doses per kilogram of body weight than in the children. The normalized-dose dependency of the orotidine response extends even to adult age. Thus, dose-normalized responses should be used in the test and there is no need for careful age-matching of the controls.