1
|
Yang Y, Jiang C, Liu Z, Zhu K, Yu B, Yuan C, Qi C, Li Z. Impact of operative time on textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy, a risk-adjusted analysis from a high-volume center. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3195-3203. [PMID: 38632118 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10834-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to study the impact of operative time on textbook outcome (TO), especially postoperative complications and length of postoperative stay in minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS Patients undergoing esophagectomy for curative intent within a prospectively maintained database from 2016 to 2022 were retrieved. Relationships between operative time and outcomes were quantified using multivariable mixed-effects models with medical teams random effects. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) plotting was used to characterize correlation between operative time and the odds for achieving TO. RESULTS Data of 2210 patients were examined. Median operative time was 270 mins (interquartile range, 233-313) for all cases. Overall, 902 patients (40.8%) achieved TO. Among non-TO patients, 226 patients (10.2%) had a major complication (grade ≥ III), 433 patients (19.6%) stayed postoperatively longer than 14 days. Multivariable analysis revealed operative time was associated with higher odds of major complications (odds ratio 1.005, P < 0.001) and prolonged postoperative stay (≥ 14 days) (odds ratio 1.003, P = 0.006). The relationship between operative time and TO exhibited an inverse-U shape, with 298 mins identified as the tipping point for the highest odds of achieving TO. CONCLUSIONS Longer operative time displayed an adverse influence on postoperative morbidity and increased lengths of postoperative stay. In the present study, the TO displayed an inverse U-shaped correlation with operative time, with a significant peak at 298 mins. Potential factors contributing to prolonged operative time may potentiate targets for quality metrics and risk-adjustment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxin Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Chao Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Zhichao Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Kaiyuan Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Boyao Yu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Chang Yuan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Cong Qi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Zhigang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 Huaihai West Rd, Shanghai, 200030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mathiesen MR, Piper TB, Olsen AA, Damtoft A, Heer PD, Vad H, Achiam MP. Textbook outcome after esophagectomy: A retrospective study from a high-volume center. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00197-1. [PMID: 38772776 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a composite quality measurement in esophageal cancer surgery. This study aimed to estimate the rate of textbook outcome esophagectomies at a high-volume center and investigate associations between textbook outcome and overall and recurrence-free survival. METHODS A retrospective single-center study was conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, analyzing esophagectomies performed from November 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Patients with primary carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction who underwent elective and curative esophagectomy were included. The rate of textbook outcome esophagectomies was calculated, and the impact of textbook outcome on overall and recurrence-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 433 patients were included in the study. Textbook outcome was achieved in 195 patients (45%). Achieving textbook outcome was independently associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.67; P = .011) and with a median overall survival of 57 months and 32 months for patients with or without textbook outcome, respectively. A trend for improved recurrence-free survival was observed for patients with textbook outcome (HR 0.74; P = .064). CONCLUSION The present study found a consensus-based textbook outcome rate of 45%. Textbook outcome was found to be directly associated with improved overall survival. These results emphasize the association between improved short-term outcomes and long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Ryskov Mathiesen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
| | - Thomas Baastrup Piper
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - August Adelsten Olsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Andreas Damtoft
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Pieter de Heer
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Henrik Vad
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Michael Patrick Achiam
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ashraf Ganjouei A, Romero-Hernandez F, Wang JJ, Hamed A, Alaa A, Bartlett D, Alseidi A, Choudry MH, Adam M. A machine learning approach for predicting textbook outcome after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38651936 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal carcinomatosis is considered a late-stage manifestation of neoplastic diseases. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) can be an effective treatment for these patients. However, the procedure is associated with significant morbidity. Our aim was to develop a machine learning model to predict the probability of achieving textbook outcome (TO) after CRS-HIPEC using only preoperatively known variables. METHODS Adult patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and who underwent CRS-HIPEC were included from a large, single-center, prospectively maintained dataset (2001-2020). TO was defined as a hospital length of stay ≤14 days and no postoperative adverse events including any complications, reoperation, readmission, and mortality within 90 days. Four models (logistic regression, neural network, random forest, and XGBoost) were trained, validated, and a user-friendly risk calculator was then developed. RESULTS A total of 1954 CRS-HIPEC procedures for peritoneal carcinomatosis were included. Overall, 13% (n = 258) achieved TO following CRS-HIPEC procedure. XGBoost and logistic regression had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.76) after model optimization, followed by random forest (AUC 0.75) and neural network (AUC 0.74). The top preoperative variables associated with achieving a TO were lower peritoneal cancer index scores, not undergoing proctectomy, splenectomy, or partial colectomy and being asymptomatic from peritoneal metastases prior to surgery. CONCLUSION This is a data-driven study to predict the probability of achieving TO after CRS-HIPEC. The proposed pipeline has the potential to not only identify patients for whom surgery is not associated with prohibitive risk, but also aid surgeons in communicating this risk to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jaeyun Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ahmed Hamed
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ahmed Alaa
- University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mohammad Haroon Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohamed Adam
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Petruch N, Servin Rojas M, Lillemoe KD, Castillo CFD, Braun R, Honselmann KC, Lapshyn H, Deichmann S, Abdalla TSA, Hummel R, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Tol KKV, Zeissig SR, Keck T, Wellner UF, Qadan M, Bolm L. The impact of surgical-oncologic textbook outcome in patients with stage I to III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A cross-validation study of two national registries. Surgery 2024; 175:1120-1127. [PMID: 38092633 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using national registries, we aimed to evaluate oncologic textbook outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS Patients with stage I to III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and surgical resection from 2010 to 2020 in the US and Germany were identified using the National Cancer Database and National Cancer Registries data. The surgical-oncologic textbook outcome was defined as complete oncologic resection with no residual tumor and ≥12 harvested lymph nodes. The composite endpoint was defined as surgical-oncologic textbook outcome and receipt of perioperative systemic and/or radiation therapy. RESULTS In total, 33,498 patients from the National Cancer Database and 14,589 patients from the National Cancer Registries were included. In the National Cancer Database, 28,931 (86%) patients had complete oncologic resection with no residual tumor, and 11,595 (79%) in the National Cancer Registries. 8,723 (26%) patients in the National Cancer Database and 556 (4%) in the National Cancer Registries had <12 lymph nodes harvested. The National Cancer Database shows 26,135 (78%) underwent perioperative therapy and 8,333 (57%) in the National Cancer Registries. Surgical-oncologic textbook outcome was achieved in 21,198 (63%) patients in the National Cancer Database and in 11,234 (77%) patients from the National Cancer Registries. 16,967 (50%) patients in the National Cancer Database and 7,878 (54%) patients in the National Cancer Registries had composite textbook outcome. Median overall survival in patients with composite textbook outcomes was 32 months in the National Cancer Database and 27 months in the National Cancer Registries (P < .001). In contrast, those with non-textbook outcomes had a median overall survival of 23 months in the National Cancer Database and 20 months in the National Cancer Registries (P < .001). CONCLUSION Surgical-oncologic textbook outcomes were achieved in > 50% of stage I to III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for both the National Cancer Database and the National Cancer Registries. Failure to achieve textbook outcomes was associated with impaired survival across both registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Petruch
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | | | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ruediger Braun
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Kim C Honselmann
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Hryhoriy Lapshyn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Steffen Deichmann
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Thaer S A Abdalla
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Richard Hummel
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers - Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kees Kleihues-van Tol
- German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers - Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sylke R Zeissig
- German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers - Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany.
| | - Ulrich F Wellner
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Louisa Bolm
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmidt T, Fuchs HF, Thomas MN, Müller DT, Lukomski L, Scholz M, Bruns CJ. [Tailored surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 95:261-267. [PMID: 38411664 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02056-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
The surgical options and particularly perioperative treatment, have significantly advanced in the case of gastroesophageal cancer. This progress enables a 5-year survival rate of nearly 50% to be achieved through curative multimodal treatment concepts for locally advanced cancer. Therefore, in tumor boards and surgical case discussions the question increasingly arises regarding the type of treatment that provides optimal oncological and functional outcomes for individual patients with pre-existing diseases. It is therefore essential to carefully assess whether organ-preserving treatment might also be considered in the future or in what way minimally invasive or robotic surgery can offer advantages. Simultaneously, the boundaries of surgical and oncological treatment are currently being shifted in order to enable curative forms of treatment for patients with pre-existing conditions or those with oligometastatic diseases. With the integration of artificial intelligence into decision-making processes, new possibilities for information processing are increasingly becoming available to incorporate even more data into making decisions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Michael N Thomas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Dolores T Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Leandra Lukomski
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Scholz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Porschen R, Langer T, Klug L, Ebert M. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus – Leitlinienreport. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e283-e319. [PMID: 38599577 DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-0374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer Porschen
- Gastroenterologische Praxis am Kreiskrankenhaus Osterholz, Osterholz-Scharmbeck, Germany
| | | | - Lars Klug
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Ebert
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
D'Souza J, Cinelli DP, McCombie A, Roberts R. The influence of postoperative outcomes on survival after esophageal cancer surgery: validation of a consensus-based updated textbook outcome parameter. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:343-350. [PMID: 38583882 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy in combination with perioperative multimodal therapy is the cornerstone of modern curative treatment for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The primary aim of this study was to assess the influence of textbook outcome (TO) as a composite quality performance indicator (QPI) and its perioperative parameters on survival in patients who underwent esophagectomy with curative intent. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent an esophagectomy between January 2014 and December 2022 at Christchurch Hospital were identified from a prospectively maintained hospital database. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors for each composite and individual postoperative outcome. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of these outcomes on overall survival. RESULTS A total of 108 patients underwent an esophagectomy during the study period. The overall and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3 postoperative complication rates were 62% and 26%, respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 6.5% (n = 7). The TO rate, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day mortality rate were 20%, 13%, and 1%, respectively. Resection margin and nodal disease were found to be independent prognostic factors for reduced survival. CONCLUSION TO as originally defined and its postoperative parameters of 30-day postoperative complications and 30-day readmission are validated QPIs of esophageal cancer surgery. Updating the postoperative complication parameter to include CD grade ≥ 3 complications resulted in a positive association between achieving TO and increased survival. Our findings support the call to redefine TO based on an update to this parameter, making it a more precise QPI of esophageal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel D'Souza
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | | | - Andrew McCombie
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Ross Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Velayudham GK, Dermanis A, Kamarajah SK, Griffiths EA. Predictors of textbook outcome following oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Dis Esophagus 2024:doae023. [PMID: 38525934 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure representing an ideal perioperative course, which has been utilized to assess the quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) surgery. We aim to determine TO rates among OGC patients in a UK tertiary center, investigate predictors of TO attainment, and evaluate the relationship between TO and survival. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected departmental database between 2006 and 2021 was conducted. Patients that underwent radical OGC surgery with curative intent were included. TO attainment required margin-negative resection, adequate lymphadenectomy, uncomplicated postoperative course, and no hospital readmission. Predictors of TO were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. The association between TO and survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression modeling. In sum, 667 esophageal cancer and 312 gastric cancer patients were included. TO was achieved in 35.1% of esophagectomy patients and 51.3% of gastrectomy patients. Several factors were independently associated with a low likelihood of TO attainment: T3 stage (odds ratio (OR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.22-0.79], p = 0.008) and T4 stage (OR:0.26, 95% CI [0.08-0.72], p = 0.013) in the esophagectomy cohort and high BMI (OR:0.93, 95% CI [0.88-0.98], p = 0.011) in the gastrectomy cohort. TO attainment was associated with greater overall survival and recurrence-free survival in esophagectomy and gastrectomy cohorts. TO is a relevant quality metric that can be utilized to compare surgical performance between centers and investigate patients at risk of TO failure. Enhancement of preoperative care measures can improve TO rates and, subsequently, long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh K Velayudham
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alexander Dermanis
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zakko J, Premkumar A, Logan AJ, Sneddon JM, Brock GN, Pawlik TM, Mokadam NA, Whitson BA, Lampert BC, Washburn WK, Osho AA, Ganapathi AM, Schenk AD. Textbook outcome: A novel metric in heart transplantation outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 167:1077-1087.e13. [PMID: 36990918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assessing heart transplant program quality using short-term survival is insufficient. We define and validate the composite metric textbook outcome and examine its association with overall survival. METHODS We identified all primary, isolated adult heart transplants in the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files from May 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017. Textbook outcome was defined as length of stay 30 days or less; ejection fraction greater than 50% during 1-year follow-up; functional status 80% to 100% at 1 year; freedom from acute rejection, dialysis, and stroke during the index hospitalization; and freedom from graft failure, dialysis, rejection, retransplantation, and mortality during the first year post-transplant. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Factors independently associated with textbook outcome were used to create a predictive nomogram. Conditional survival at 1 year was measured. RESULTS A total of 24,620 patients were identified with 11,169 (45.4%, 95% confidence interval, 44.7-46.0) experiencing textbook outcome. Patients with textbook outcome were more likely free from preoperative mechanical support (odds ratio, 3.504, 95% confidence interval, 2.766 to 4.439, P < .001), free from preoperative dialysis (odds ratio, 2.295, 95% confidence interval, 1.868-2.819, P < .001), to be not hospitalized (odds ratio, 1.264, 95% confidence interval, 1.183-1.349, P < .001), to be nondiabetic (odds ratio, 1.187, 95% confidence interval, 1.113-1.266, P < .001), and to be nonsmokers (odds ratio, 1.160, 95% confidence interval,1.097-1.228, P < .001). Patients with textbook outcome have improved long-term survival relative to patients without textbook outcome who survive at least 1 year (hazard ratio for death, 0.547, 95% confidence interval, 0.504-0.593, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Textbook outcome is an alternative means of examining heart transplant outcomes and is associated with long-term survival. The use of textbook outcome as an adjunctive metric provides a holistic view of patient and center outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Zakko
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - April J Logan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey M Sneddon
- Division of Transplant Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Guy N Brock
- Division of Transplant Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nahush A Mokadam
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Bryan A Whitson
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Brent C Lampert
- Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - William K Washburn
- Division of Transplant Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Asishana A Osho
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Asvin M Ganapathi
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Austin D Schenk
- Division of Transplant Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ashraf Ganjouei A, Romero-Hernandez F, Conroy PC, Miller PN, Calthorpe L, Wang JJ, Lin JJ, Feng J, Kirkwood KS, Alseidi A, Sarin A, Adam MA. A Novel Machine Learning Approach to Predict Textbook Outcome in Colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:322-332. [PMID: 37815314 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several calculators exist to predict risk of postoperative complications. However, in low-risk procedures such as colectomy, a tool to determine the probability of achieving the ideal outcome could better aid clinical decision-making, especially for high-risk patients. A textbook outcome is a composite measure that serves as a surrogate for the ideal surgical outcome. OBJECTIVE To identify the most important factors for predicting textbook outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer undergoing colectomy and to create a textbook outcome decision support tool using machine learning algorithms. DESIGN This was a retrospective analysis study. SETTINGS Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS Adult patients undergoing elective colectomy for nonmetastatic colon cancer (2014-2020) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Textbook outcome was the main outcome, defined as no mortality, no 30-day readmission, no postoperative complications, no 30-day reinterventions, and a hospital length of stay of ≤5 days. Four models (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting) were trained and validated. Ultimately, a web-based calculator was developed as proof of concept for clinical application. RESULTS A total of 20,498 patients who underwent colectomy for nonmetastatic colon cancer were included. Overall, textbook outcome was achieved in 66% of patients. Textbook outcome was more frequently achieved after robotic colectomy (77%), followed by laparoscopic colectomy (68%) and open colectomy (39%, p < 0.001). eXtreme Gradient Boosting was the best performing model (area under the curve = 0.72). The top 5 preoperative variables to predict textbook outcome were surgical approach, patient age, preoperative hematocrit, preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation, and patient sex. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective nature of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS Using textbook outcome as the preferred outcome may be a useful tool in relatively low-risk procedures such as colectomy, and the proposed web-based calculator may aid surgeons in preoperative evaluation and counseling, especially for high-risk patients. See Video Abstract . UN NUEVO ENFOQUE DE APRENDIZAJE AUTOMTICO PARA PREDECIR EL RESULTADO DE LOS LIBROS DE TEXTO EN COLECTOMA ANTECEDENTES:Existen varias calculadoras para predecir el riesgo de complicaciones posoperatorias. Sin embargo, en procedimientos de bajo riesgo como la colectomía, una herramienta para determinar la probabilidad de lograr el resultado ideal podría ayudar mejor a la toma de decisiones clínicas, especialmente para pacientes de alto riesgo. Un resultado de libro de texto es una medida compuesta que sirve como sustituto del resultado quirúrgico ideal.OBJETIVO:Identificar los factores más importantes para predecir el resultado de los libros de texto en pacientes con cáncer de colon no metastásico sometidos a colectomía y crear una herramienta de apoyo a la toma de decisiones sobre los resultados de los libros de texto utilizando algoritmos de aprendizaje automático.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Los datos se obtuvieron de la base de datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes adultos sometidos a colectomía electiva por cáncer de colon no metastásico (2014-2020).MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADO:El resultado de los libros de texto fue el resultado principal, definido como ausencia de mortalidad, reingreso a los 30 días, complicaciones posoperatorias, reintervenciones a los 30 días y una estancia hospitalaria ≤5 días. Se entrenaron y validaron cuatro modelos (regresión logística, árbol de decisión, bosque aleatorio y XGBoost). Finalmente, se desarrolló una calculadora basada en la web como prueba de concepto para su aplicación clínica.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 20.498 pacientes sometidos a colectomía por cáncer de colon no metastásico. En general, el resultado de los libros de texto se logró en el 66% de los pacientes. Los resultados de los libros de texto se lograron con mayor frecuencia después de la colectomía robótica (77%), seguida de la colectomía laparoscópica (68%) y la colectomía abierta (39%) (p<0,001). XGBoost fue el modelo con mejor rendimiento (AUC=0,72). Los cinco principales variables preoperatorias para predecir el resultado en los libros de texto fueron el abordaje quirúrgico, la edad del paciente, el hematocrito preoperatorio, la preparación intestinal con antibióticos orales preoperatorios y el sexo femenino.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por la naturaleza retrospectiva del análisis.CONCLUSIONES:El uso de los resultados de los libros de texto como resultado preferido puede ser una herramienta útil en procedimientos de riesgo relativamente bajo, como la colectomía, y la calculadora basada en la web propuesta puede ayudar a los cirujanos en la evaluación y el asesoramiento preoperatorios, especialmente para pacientes de alto riesgo. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Ashraf Ganjouei
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Patricia C Conroy
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Phoebe N Miller
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Lucia Calthorpe
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jaeyun Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jackie J Lin
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jean Feng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Kimberly S Kirkwood
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ankit Sarin
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Mohamed A Adam
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buchholz V, Hazard R, Lee DK, Liu DS, Zhang W, Chen S, Aly A, Barnett S, Le P, Weinberg L. Textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy: a single-centre observational study. BMC Surg 2023; 23:368. [PMID: 38066440 PMCID: PMC10704701 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02253-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcomes is a composite quality assurance tool assessing the ideal perioperative and postoperative course as a unified measure. Currently, its definition and application in the context of oesophagectomy in Australia is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy in a single referral centre of Australia and investigate the association between textbook outcomes and patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics. METHODS An observational study was retrospectively performed on patients undergoing open, laparoscopic, or hybrid oesophagectomy between January 2010 and December 2019 in a single cancer referral centre. A textbook outcome was defined as the fulfillment of 10 criteria: R0 resection, retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes, no intraoperative complications, no postoperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade III, no anastomotic leak, no readmission to the ICU, no hospital stay beyond 21 days, no mortality within 90 days, no readmission related to the surgical procedure within 30 days from admission and no reintervention related to the surgical procedure. The proportion of patients who met each criterion for textbook outcome was calculated and compared. Selected patient-related parameters (age, gender, BMI, ASA score, CCI score), tumour-related factors (tumour location, tumour histology, AJCC clinical T and N stage and treatment-related factor [neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical approach]) were assessed. Disease recurrence and one year survival were also evaluated. RESULTS 110 patients who underwent oesophagectomy were included. The overall textbook outcome rate was 24%. The difference in rates across the years was not statistically significant. The most achieved textbook outcome parameters were 'no mortality in 90 days' (96%) and 'R0 resection' (89%). The least frequently met textbook outcome parameter was 'no severe postoperative complications' (58%), followed by 'no hospital stays over 21 days' (61%). No significant association was found between patient, tumour and treatment characteristics and the rate of textbook outcome. Tumour recurrence rate and overall long term survival was similar between textbook outcome and non-textbook outcome groups. Patients with R0 resection, no intraoperative complication and a hospital stay less than 21 days had reduced mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS Textbook outcome is a clinically relevant indicator and was achieved in 24% of patients. Severe complications and a prolonged hospital stay were the key criteria that limited the achievement of a textbook outcome. These findings provide meticulous evaluation of oesophagectomy perioperative care and provide a direction for the utilisation of this concept in identifying and improving surgical and oncological care across multiple healthcare levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vered Buchholz
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Riley Hazard
- Department of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dong-Kyu Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - David S Liu
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, The University of Melbourne, Austin, USA
- Division of Cancer Surgery, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Precinct, VIC, Australia
| | - Wendell Zhang
- Department of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharon Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ahmed Aly
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen Barnett
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Le
- Division of Cancer Surgery, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Precinct, VIC, Australia
| | - Laurence Weinberg
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wright FC, Milkovich J, Hunter A, Darling G, Irish J. Refining the thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards for esophageal surgery in Ontario, Canada: Moving from good to better. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1502-1509. [PMID: 37005118 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The consolidation of surgical practices has been suggested to improve patient outcomes for complex surgeries. In 2005, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario released the Thoracic Surgical Oncology Standards to facilitate the regionalization process at thoracic centers in Ontario, Canada. This work describes the quality-improvement process involved in updating the minimum surgical volume and supporting requirement recommendations for thoracic centers to further optimize patient care for esophageal cancer. METHODS We conducted a literature review to identify and synthesize evidence informing the volume-outcome relationship related to esophagectomy. The results of this review and esophageal cancer surgery common indicators (reoperation rate, unplanned visit rate, 30-day and 90-day mortality) from Ontario's Surgical Quality Indicator Report were presented and reviewed by a Thoracic Esophageal Standards Expert Panel and Surgical Oncology Program Leads at Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario. Hospital outliers were identified, and a subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the most appropriate minimum surgical volume threshold based on 30- and 90-day mortality rates data from the last 3 fiscal years. RESULTS Based on the finding that a significant decrease in mortality occurred at 12 to 15 esophagectomies per year, the Thoracic Esophageal Standards Expert Panel reached a consensus that thoracic centers should perform a minimum of 15 esophagectomies per year. The panel also recommended that any center performing esophagectomies have at least 3 thoracic surgeons to ensure continuity in clinical care. CONCLUSIONS We have described the process involved in updating the provincial minimum volume threshold and the appropriate support services for esophageal cancer surgery in Ontario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances C Wright
- Surgical Oncology Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - John Milkovich
- Surgical Oncology Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amber Hunter
- Surgical Oncology Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail Darling
- Surgical Oncology Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Irish
- Surgical Oncology Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kulasegaran S, Wang Y, Woodhouse B, MacCormick A, Srinivasa S, Koea J. Quality Performance Indicators for the Surgical Management of Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. World J Surg 2023; 47:3262-3269. [PMID: 37865917 PMCID: PMC10694097 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07216-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this systematic review was to identify pre-existing quality performance indicators (QPIs) for the surgical management of oesophageal cancer (OC). These QPIs can be used to objectively measure and compare the performance of individual units and capture key elements of patient care to improve patient outcomes. METHODS A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase was conducted. Articles reporting on the quality of healthcare in relation to oesophageal neoplasm or cancer and the surgical treatment of OC available until the 1st of March 2022 were included. RESULTS The final list of articles included retrospective reviews (n = 13), prospective reviews (n = 8), expert guidelines (n = 1) and consensus (n = 1). The final list of QPIs was categorized as process, outcome or structural measures. Process measures included multidisciplinary involvement, availability of multimodality diagnostic and treatment pathways and surgical metrics. Outcome measures included reoperation and readmission rates, the achievement of RO resection and length of hospital stay. Structural measures include multidisciplinary meetings. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review summarizes QPIs for the surgical treatment of OC. The data will serve as an introduction to establishing a quality initiative project for OC resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yijiao Wang
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Braden Woodhouse
- Department of Oncology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew MacCormick
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sanket Srinivasa
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Koea
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sędłak K, Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Mlak R, Van Sandick J, Gisbertz S, Pera M, Dal Cero M, Baiocchi GL, Celotti A, Morgagni P, Vittimberga G, Hoelscher A, Moenig S, Kołodziejczyk P, Richter P, Gockel I, Piessen G, Da Costa PM, Davies A, Baker C, Allum W, Romario UF, De Pascale S, Rosati R, Reim D, Santos LL, D'ugo D, Wijnhoven B, Degiuli M, De Manzoni G, Kielan W, Frejlich E, Schneider P, Polkowski WP. Textbook Oncological Outcome in European GASTRODATA. Ann Surg 2023; 278:823-831. [PMID: 37555342 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the rate of textbook outcome (TO) and textbook oncological outcome (TOO) in the European population based on the GASTRODATA registry. BACKGROUND TO is a composite parameter assessing surgical quality and strongly correlates with improved overall survival. Following the standard of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer, TOO was proposed as a quality and optimal multimodal treatment parameter. METHODS TO was achieved when all the following criteria were met: no intraoperative complications, radical resection according to the surgeon, pR0 resection, retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes, no severe postoperative complications, no reintervention, no admission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged length of stay, no postoperative mortality and no hospital readmission. TOO was defined as TO with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy compliance. RESULTS Of the 2558 patients, 1700 were included in the analysis. TO was achieved in 1164 (68.5%) patients. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.70] and D2 or D2+ lymphadenectomy (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.10) had a positive impact on TO achievement. Older age (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94), pT3/4 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99), ASA 3/4 (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86) and total gastrectomy (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.70), had a negative impact on TO achievement. TOO was achieved in 388 (22.8%) patients. Older age (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.53), pT3 or pT4 (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69), and ASA 3 or 4 (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.79) had a negative impact on TOO achievement. CONCLUSIONS Despite successively improved surgical outcomes, stage-appropriate chemotherapy in adherence to the current guidelines for multimodal treatment of gastric cancer remains poor. Further implementation of oncologic quality metrics should include greater emphasis on perioperative chemotherapy and adequate lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Sędłak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Radosław Mlak
- Department of Preclinical Sciences, Body Composition Research Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Johanna Van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manuel Pera
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariagiulia Dal Cero
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, and Third Division of General Surgery, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Celotti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, and Third Division of General Surgery, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Morgagni
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | | | | | - Stefan Moenig
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Piotr Richter
- Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College
| | - Ines Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, and Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | | | - Andrew Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, London, UK
| | - Cara Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, London, UK
| | - William Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Ricccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Reim
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| | - Lucio Lara Santos
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Experimental Pathology and Therapeutics Group, Portuguese Institute Of Oncology, Porto, Portugal
| | - Domenico D'ugo
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of General Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurizio Degiuli
- Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Turin 10049, Italy
| | - Giovanni De Manzoni
- Department of Surgery, General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Wojciech Kielan
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ewelina Frejlich
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paul Schneider
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lading T, Kjaer D, Bendixen M, Petersen TI, Christensen TD, Katballe N. Safe and efficient 2-step implementation of totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15:5362-5370. [PMID: 37969264 PMCID: PMC10636444 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Background The clinical benefits of totally minimal invasive esophagectomy (TIME) compared to open esophagectomy are documented and include reduced morbidity like pulmonary infections, shorter hospital stay and an increase in short-term quality of life. However, transition to TIME can be associated with a learning curve associated increased morbidity. We report our implementation of TIME using a 2-step approach, where the thoracoscopic part was added to the laparoscopic part in carefully selected patients. The hypothesis was that the 2-step implementation provides a safe and efficient implementation without compromising the outcomes for the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluation the implementation of minimal invasive esophagectomy at Aarhus University Hospital, where a 2-step implementation strategy has been used. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study a total of 369 patients with esophagus or gastroesophageal cancers underwent esophagectomy from September 1st, 2016 to July 31st, 2021 in a single high-volume tertiary institution. Totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed by experienced minimal invasive surgeons in 120 of the cases. The study presents the complication rates of the TIME patients in the implementation phase. Results Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7.5% of the cases and pneumonia occurred in 5.8% of the cases. The lymph node count reached 16 or more in 94.3% of the cases and R0-resection was performed in 98.3% of the cases. Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery was achieved in 45.8% of the patients. Conclusions Hybrid minimal invasive esophagectomy can serve as a step towards totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. In our institution, major learning curve associated complications was avoided and a high level of cancer control was achieved by a 2-step implementation strategy in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troels Lading
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Daniel Kjaer
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Bendixen
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Thomas Decker Christensen
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Katballe
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu MY, McGregor RJ, Scott J, Smithers BM, Thomas J, Frankel A, Barbour A, Thomson I. Textbook outcomes for oesophagectomy: A valid composite measure assessment tool for surgical performance in a specialist unit. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106897. [PMID: 37032271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2017 the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit Group proposed a ten-item composite measure for a 'textbook outcome' (TBO) following oesophago-gastric resection. Studies have shown associations between TBO and improved conditional and overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of TBO to assess the outcomes from a single specialist unit in a country, with low incidence of disease, allowing comparisons with international specialist centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected oesophageal cancer surgery data at a single centre, in Australia, between 2013 and 2018. Multivariable logistical regression assessed association between baseline factors and TBO. Post-operative complications were analysed in two separate groups as Clavien-Dindo ≥2 (CD ≥ 2) and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 (CD ≥ 3). Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis determined the association between TBO and survival. RESULTS 246 patients were analysed, with 50.8% (n = 125) achieving a TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2 and 58.9% (n = 145) when using CD ≥ 3. Patients aged ≥75, and those with a pre-operative respiratory co-morbidity were less likely to achieve a TBO. Overall survival was not influenced by TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2, however it was higher when a TBO was achieved, and complications were defined as CD ≥ 3 (HR 0.54, 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION TBO is a multi-parameter metric that allowed benchmarking of the quality of oesophageal cancer surgery in our unit, providing favourable outcomes compared with other published data. There was an association between TBO and improved overall survival when the definition of severe complications was CD ≥ 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yulong Wu
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia
| | - Richard J McGregor
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Justin Scott
- QCIF Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| | - Janine Thomas
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia
| | - Adam Frankel
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| | - Andrew Barbour
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| | - Iain Thomson
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Çetinkaya-Hosgör C, Seika P, Raakow J, Kröll D, Dobrindt EM, Maurer MM, Martin F, Ossami Saidy RR, Thuss-Patience P, Pratschke J, Biebl M, Denecke C. Textbook Outcome after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Is Associated with Improved Overall and Disease-Free Survival. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5419. [PMID: 37629461 PMCID: PMC10455280 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The complexity of the perioperative outcome for patients with gastric cancer is not well reflected by single quality metrics. To study the effect of the surgical outcome on survival, we have evaluated the relationship between textbook outcome (TO)-a new composite parameter-and oncological outcome. (2) Methods: All patients undergoing total gastrectomy or trans-hiatal extended gastrectomy for gastric cancer with curative intent between 2017 and 2021 at our institution were included. TO was defined by negative resection margins (R0); collection of ≥25 lymph nodes; the absence of major perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3); the absence of any reintervention; absence of unplanned ICU re-admission; length of hospital stay < 21 days; absence of 30-day readmission and 30-day mortality. We evaluated factors affecting TO by multivariate logistic regression. The correlation between TO and long-term survival was assessed using a multivariate cox proportional-hazards model. (3) Results: Of the patients included in this study, 52 (52.5 %) achieved all TO metrics. Open surgery (p = 0.010; OR 3.715, CI 1.334-10.351) and incomplete neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.020, OR 4.278, CI 1.176-15.553) were associated with failure to achieve TO on multivariate analysis. The achievement of TO significantly affected overall survival (p = 0.015). TO (p = 0.037, OD 0.448, CI 0.211-0.954) and CCI > 4 (p = 0.034, OR 2.844, CI 1.079-7.493) were significant factors affecting DFS upon univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, CCI > 4 (p = 0.035, OR 2.605, CI 0.983-6.905) was significantly associated with DFS. (4) Conclusions: We identified patient- and procedure-related factors influencing TO. Importantly, achieving TO is strongly associated with improved long-term survival in gastric cancer patients and merits further focus on surgical quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candan Çetinkaya-Hosgör
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Philippa Seika
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Sciences, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Jonas Raakow
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dino Kröll
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Dobrindt
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Magnus Maurer
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Martin
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplant Surgery, Congregational Hospital Linz, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
- Kepler University Hospital Linz, Med. Campus III, Krankenhaussstrasse 7a, 4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Christian Denecke
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bolger JC, Castro PP, Marwah A, Tavakoli I, Espin-Garcia O, Darling GE, Yeung JC. Nodal Yield <15 Is Associated With Reduced Survival in Esophagectomy and Is a Quality Metric. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 116:130-136. [PMID: 36918078 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.02.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy remains the cornerstone of curative management of esophageal adenocarcinoma and is frequently used for squamous cell carcinoma. The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy and whether increasing lymph node yields confer a survival benefit remains unclear. Guidelines suggest resecting and examining a minimum of 15 lymph nodes at esophagectomy. This study assessed the impact of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival, identifying factors influencing nodal yield and radicality of resection. METHODS All patients undergoing esophagectomy with curative intent at a single institution (stage 1-4 inclusive) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, were reviewed. Clinical and pathologic variables were interrogated. LNR was calculated by dividing positive lymph nodes by the total nodes resected. RESULTS Esophagectomy was performed in 397 patients, with 288 undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Margin status (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.15-2.83; P < .01), nodal yield <15 (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.29-3.04; P = .002), and elevated LNR (HR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.89-23.06; P < .001) predicted survival. MIE had higher nodal yields compared with open procedures (30.7 vs 25.3, P < .001). Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy had lower nodal yields compared with those with no neoadjuvant therapy and those with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (26.4 vs 30.6 vs 36.8, respectively; P < .001). Regression analysis determined a LNR of <0.05 was associated with a survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS Textbook lymphadenectomy is associated with improved survival. Low lymph node yield and a high LNR are associated with reduced overall survival. A LNR of <0.05 is associated with significant survival benefit. A minimum nodal yield of 15 should remain the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarlath C Bolger
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Pablo Perez Castro
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anindita Marwah
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iran Tavakoli
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Osvaldo Espin-Garcia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail E Darling
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Yeung
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival? Cir Esp 2023; 101:20-28. [PMID: 35787475 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the "ideal" surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. OBJECTIVE We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. METHOD Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. PERIOD January 2015-December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, >15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. RESULTS 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable >15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). CONCLUSION In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance.
Collapse
|
20
|
Naumann DN, Bhangu A, Brooks A, Martin M, Cotton BA, Khan M, Midwinter MJ, Pearce L, Bowley DM, Holcomb JB, Griffiths EA. A call for patient-centred textbook outcomes for emergency surgery and trauma. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1191-1193. [PMID: 35979582 PMCID: PMC10364760 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David N Naumann
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aneel Bhangu
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,NIHR Global Health Unit on Global Surgery, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam Brooks
- Department of Major Trauma, East Midlands Major Trauma Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew Martin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Los Angeles County & USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Bryan A Cotton
- The Center for Translational Injury Research, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mansoor Khan
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Mark J Midwinter
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lyndsay Pearce
- Department of Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Douglas M Bowley
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John B Holcomb
- Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yang J, Guo X, Zheng Z, Ke W. Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:236. [PMID: 35879661 PMCID: PMC9310395 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01775-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data providing a relationship between the anesthetic method and postoperative length of stay (PLOS) is limited. We aimed to investigate whether general anesthesia alone or combined with epidural anesthesia might affect perioperative risk factors and PLOS for patients undergoing radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors. METHODS The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 680 patients who underwent a radical esophageal malignant tumor resection in a Chinese hospital from January 01, 2010, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome measure was PLOS, and the secondary outcome was perioperative risk-related parameters that affect PLOS. The independent variable was the type of anesthesia: general anesthesia (GA) or combined epidural-general anesthesia (E-GA). The dependent variable was PLOS. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching to compare the relationships of GA and E-GA with PLOS and identify the perioperative risk factors for PLOS. In this cohort study, the confounders included sociodemographic data, preoperative chemotherapy, coexisting diseases, laboratory parameters, intraoperative variables, and postoperative complications. RESULTS In all patients, the average PLOS was 19.85 ± 12.60 days. There was no significant difference in PLOS between the GA group and the E-GA group either before or after propensity score matching (20.01 days ± 14.90 days vs. 19.79 days ± 11.57 days, P = 0.094, 18.09 ± 9.71 days vs. 19.39 ± 10.75 days, P = 0.145). The significant risk factors for increased PLOS were lung infection (β = 3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54-5.52), anastomotic leakage (β = 25.73, 95% CI: 22.11-29.34), and surgical site infection (β = 9.39, 95% CI: 4.10-14.68) by multivariate regression analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association between PLOS and vasoactive drug use, blood transfusions, and open esophagectomy. The results remained essentially the same (stable and reliable) after subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS Although there is no significant association between the type of anesthesia(GA or E-GA) and PLOS for patients undergoing radical esophageal malignant tumor resection, an association between PLOS and lung infection, anastomotic leakage, and surgical site infection was determined by multivariate regression analysis. A larger sample future study design may verify our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieping Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xukeng Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zonggui Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third People' Hospital of Shantou, No. 12 Haipang Road, Haojiang District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Weiqi Ke
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Surgical Therapy of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Current Standards and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225834. [PMID: 34830988 PMCID: PMC8616112 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Subtotal resection of the esophagus with resection of local lymph nodes is the oncological procedure of choice for advanced esophageal cancer. Reconstruction of the intestinal tract is predominantly performed with a gastric tube. Even in specialized centers, this surgical procedure is associated with a high complication but low mortality rate. Therefore, clinical research aims to develop peri- and intra-operative strategies to improve the patient related outcome. Abstract Transthoracic esophagectomy is currently the predominant curative treatment option for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. The majority of carcinomas present as locally advanced tumors requiring multimodal strategies with either neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy alone. Minimally invasive, including robotic, techniques are increasingly applied with a broad spectrum of technical variations existing for the oncological resection as well as gastric reconstruction. At the present, intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy is the preferred technique of reconstruction (Ivor Lewis esophagectomy). With standardized surgical procedures, a complete resection of the primary tumor can be achieved in almost 95% of patients. Even in expert centers, postoperative morbidity remains high, with an overall complication rate of 50–60%, whereas 30- and 90-day mortality are reported to be <2% and <6%, respectively. Due to the complexity of transthoracic esophagetomy and its associated morbidity, esophageal surgery is recommended to be performed in specialized centers with an appropriate caseload yet to be defined. In order to reduce postoperative morbidity, the selection of patients, preoperative rehabilitation and postoperative fast-track concepts are feasible strategies of perioperative management. Future directives aim to further centralize esophageal services, to individualize surgical treatment for high-risk patients and to implement intraoperative imaging modalities modifying the oncological extent of resection and facilitating surgical reconstruction.
Collapse
|
23
|
Carbonell Morote S, Gracia Alegría E, Ruiz de la Cuesta Tapia E, Llopis Torremocha C, Ortiz Sebastián S, Estrada Caballero JL, Villodre C, Ramia JM. Textbook outcome en cirugía gástrica oncológica, ¿qué implicaciones tiene sobre la supervivencia? Cir Esp 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
24
|
Ramia JM, Soria-Aledo V. Textbook outcome: A new quality tool. Cir Esp 2021; 100:S0009-739X(21)00215-3. [PMID: 34243935 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Ramia
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. ISABIAL. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, España.
| | - Victoriano Soria-Aledo
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer. Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España
| |
Collapse
|