Maximum phonation time: an independent predictor of late-onset pneumonia after esophageal cancer surgery

Voice Meets Swallowing: A Scoping Review of Therapeutic Connections

PURPOSE

This scoping review aimed to explore the use of volitional voice tasks in assessing swallowing-related outcomes and to evaluate their therapeutic impact on swallowing disorders, including their effects on swallowing biomechanics.

METHOD

This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A literature search was performed across multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus), and additional records were identified through manual searches. After screening and eligibility assessment, 36 studies were included for data extraction and analysis. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

The review identified various volitional voice tasks, such as maximum phonation time and pitch glides, as potential assessment tools for predicting swallowing-related outcomes. Additionally, voice tasks targeting pitch modulation, increased vocal loudness, and squeezed voice quality showed promising therapeutic benefits for swallowing disorders across different populations, especially individuals with neurological conditions and head and neck cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

While methodological limitations were found in current literature, volitional voice tasks demonstrate potential as complementary tools for assessing and treating swallowing disorders, leveraging their interconnected neurological and biomechanical mechanisms underlying functions. Further research with more robust methodologies is needed to establish the efficacy of these integrated interventions, facilitate their translation into clinical practice, and test new possibilities.

Association of perioperative oral swallowing function with post-esophagectomy outcomes and nutritional statuses in patients with esophageal cancer

Dysphagia after esophagectomy is a serious complication; however, no method has been established to accurately assess swallowing function. We evaluated the association of swallowing function tests with patients' post-esophagectomy complications and nutritional statuses. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 95 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy between 2016 and 2021. We performed perioperative swallowing function tests, including the repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), maximum phonation time (MPT), and laryngeal elevation (LE). Patients with recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) and respiratory complications (RC) had significantly lower postoperative RSST scores than patients without them; the scores in patients with or without anastomotic leakage (AL) were similar. Postoperative MPT in patients with RLNP was shorter than that in patients without RLNP; however, it was similar to that in patients with or without AL and RC. LE was not associated with any complications. Patients with an RSST score ≤2 at 2 weeks post-esophagectomy had significant weight loss at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared with patients with an RSST score ≥3. The proportion of patients with severe weight loss (≥20% weight loss) within 1 year of esophagectomy was significantly greater in patients with RSST scores ≤2 than in those with RSST scores ≥3. Multivariate analysis showed that an RSST score ≤2 was the only predictor of severe post-esophagectomy weight loss. RSST scoring is a simple tool for evaluating post-esophagectomy swallowing function. A lower RSST score is associated with postoperative RLNP, RC, and poor nutritional status.

Changes in and clinical utility of maximum phonation time and repetitive saliva swallowing test scores after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal cancer occurs due to swallowing dysfunction and aspiration. Recently, maximum phonation time (MPT) assessment and repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST) have been focused on as swallowing function assessment methods that can identify patients as high risk for pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of MPT assessment and RSST in patients undergoing oncological esophagectomy.

METHODS

In total, 47 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between August 2020 and July 2023 were eligible. The perioperative changes in MPTs and RSST scores were examined. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictive factors of postoperative pneumonia.

RESULTS

The median MPTs before surgery and on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 6, and 10 were 18.4, 7.2, 10.6, and 12.4 s, respectively; postoperative MPTs were significantly lower than preoperative MPT. In addition, the MPT of POD 6 was significantly longer than that of POD 3 (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, there were no significant changes in perioperative RSST scores. Overall, 8 of 47 patients (17.0%) developed pneumonia postoperatively. A short MPT on POD 6 was one of the independent predictive factors for the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio: 12.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-123, P = 0.03) in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPT significantly decreased after esophagectomy. However, the RSST score did not. The MPT on POD6 can be a predictor of postoperative pneumonia.

Impact of maximum phonation time on postoperative dysphagia and prognosis after cardiac surgery

Objective

The incidence of postoperative complications, including dysphagia, increases as the population undergoing cardiovascular surgery ages. This study aimed to explore the potential of maximum phonation time (MPT) as a simple tool for predicting postextubation dysphagia (PED) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

Methods

This retrospective study included 442 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery at a university hospital. MPT was measured before surgery, and patients were stratified into 2 groups based on normal and abnormal MPTs. Postoperative complications, including PED and MACCEs, were also investigated. Swallowing status was assessed using the Food Intake Level Scale.

Results

MPT predicted PED with prevalence of 11.0% and 18.0% in the normal and abnormal MPT groups, respectively (P = .01). During the follow-up period, MACCEs developed in 17.0% of patients. Frailty, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, PED, and MPT were markedly associated with MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratios: 2.25, 1.08, 1.96, and 0.96, respectively). Mediation analysis revealed that MPT positively influenced PED and MACCEs, whereas PED positively influenced MACCEs. The trend in restricted cubic spline analysis indicated that the hazard ratio for MACCEs increased sharply when MPT was <10 seconds.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the potential of MPT as a valuable tool in the preoperative assessment and management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. By incorporating MPT into routine preoperative evaluations, clinicians can identify patients at a higher risk of PED and MACCEs, allowing for targeted interventions and closer postoperative monitoring. This may improve patient outcomes and reduce the health care costs associated with these complications.