Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor improves early risk stratification in cardiogenic shock

Current and novel biomarkers in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a 30-50% in-hospital mortality rate, with little improvement in outcomes in the last decade. Challenges in improving outcomes are closely linked to the frequent late presentation or diagnosis of CS where the 'point of no return' has often passed, leading to haemodynamic dysregulation, progressive myocardial depression, hypotension, and a downward spiral of hypoperfusion, organ dysfunction and decreasing myocardial function, driven by inflammation and metabolic derangements. Novel therapeutic interventions may have varying efficacy depending on the type and stage of shock in which they are applied. Biomarkers that aid prediction and early detection of CS, provide early signs of organ dysfunction and define prognosis could help optimize management. Temporal change in such biomarkers, particularly in response to pharmacological interventions and/or mechanical circulatory support, can guide management and predict outcome. Several novel biomarkers enhance the prediction of mortality in CS, compared to conventional parameters such as lactate, with some, such as adrenomedullin and circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3, also able to predict the development of CS. Some biomarkers reflect systemic inflammation (e.g. interleukin-6, angiopoietin 2, fibroblast growth factor 23 and suppressor of tumorigenicity 2) and are not specific to CS, yet inform on the activation of important pathways involved in the downward shock spiral. Other biomarkers signal end-organ hypoperfusion and could guide targeted interventions, while some may serve as novel therapeutic targets. We critically review current and novel biomarkers that guide prediction, detection, and prognostication in CS. Future use of biomarkers may help improve management in these high-risk patients.

Cardiogenic Shock: Focus on Non-Cardiac Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the evolving multifaceted nature of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the context of non-cardiac biomarkers that may improve CS management and risk stratification.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are increasing data highlighting the role of lactate, glucose, and other markers of inflammation and end-organ dysfunction in CS. These biomarkers provide a more comprehensive understanding of the concurrent hemo-metabolic and cellular disturbances observed in CS and offer insights beyond standard structural and functional cardiac assessments. Non-cardiac biomarkers both refine the diagnostic accuracy and improve the prognostic assessments in CS. Further studies revolving around novel biomarkers are warranted to support more targeted and effective therapeutic and management interventions in these high-risk patients.

Biomarkers in cardiogenic shock: old pals, new friends

In cardiogenic shock, biomarkers should ideally help make the diagnosis, choose the right therapeutic options and monitor the patient in addition to clinical and echocardiographic indices. Among "old" biomarkers that have been used for decades, lactate detects, quantifies, and follows anaerobic metabolism, despite its lack of specificity. Renal and liver biomarkers are indispensable for detecting the effect of shock on organ function and are highly predictive of poor outcomes. Direct biomarkers of cardiac damage such as cardiac troponins, B-type natriuretic and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides have a good prognostic value, but they lack specificity to detect a cardiogenic cause of shock, as many factors influence their plasma concentrations in critically ill patients. Among the biomarkers that have been more recently described, dipeptidyl peptidase-3 is one of the most interesting. In addition to its prognostic value, it could represent a therapeutic target in cardiogenic shock in the future as a specific antibody inhibits its activity. Adrenomedullin is a small peptide hormone secreted by various tissues, including vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelium, particularly under pathological conditions. It has a vasodilator effect and has prognostic value during cardiogenic shock. An antibody inhibits its activity and so adrenomedullin could represent a therapeutic target in cardiogenic shock. An increasing number of inflammatory biomarkers are also of proven prognostic value in cardiogenic shock, reflecting the inflammatory reaction associated with the syndrome. Some of them are combined to form prognostic proteomic scores. Alongside clinical variables, biomarkers can be used to establish biological "signatures" characteristic of the pathophysiological pathways involved in cardiogenic shock. This helps describe patient subphenotypes, which could in the future be used in clinical trials to define patient populations responding specifically to a treatment.