Cooperative modulation by eIF4G of eIF4E-binding to the mRNA 5' cap in yeast involves a site partially shared by p20

Structural analysis of the Trypanosoma brucei EIF4E6/EIF4G5 complex reveals details of the interaction between unusual eIF4F subunits

Recognition of the mRNA 5' end is a critical step needed for translation initiation. This step is performed by the cap binding protein eIF4E, which joins the larger eIF4G subunit to form the eIF4F complex. Trypanosomatids have a minimum of five different eIF4F-like complexes formed through specific but not well-defined interactions between four different eIF4E and five eIF4G homologues. The EIF4E6/EIF4G5 complex has been linked with the stage-specific translation of mRNAs encoding the major Trypanosoma brucei virulence factors. Here, to better define the molecular basis for the TbEIF4E6/TbEIF4G5 interaction, we describe the identification of the peptide interacting with TbEIF4E6 in the region comprising residues 79-166 of TbEIF4G5. The TbEIF4E6-TbEIF4G5_79-116 complex reconstituted with recombinant proteins is highly stable even in the absence of cap-4. The crystal structure of the complex was subsequently solved, revealing extensive interacting surfaces. Comparative analyses highlight the conservation of the overall structural arrangement of different eIF4E/eIF4G complexes. However, highly different interacting surfaces are formed with distinct binding contacts occurring both in the canonical and noncanonical elements within eIF4G and the respective eIF4E counterpart. These specific pairs of complementary interacting surfaces are likely responsible for the selective association needed for the formation of distinct eIF4F complexes in trypanosomatids.

Yeast Tor complex 1 phosphorylates eIF4E-binding protein, Caf20

Tor complex 1 (TORC1), a master regulator of cell growth, is an evolutionarily conserved protein kinase within eukaryotic organisms. To control cell growth, TORC1 governs translational processes by phosphorylating its substrate proteins in response to cellular nutritional cues. Mammalian TORC1 (mTORC1) assumes the responsibility of phosphorylating the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) to regulate its interaction with eIF4E. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae possesses a pair of 4E-BP genes, CAF20 and EAP1. However, the extent to which the TORC1-4E-BP axis regulates translational initiation in yeast remains uncertain. In this study, we demonstrated the influence of TORC1 on the phosphorylation status of Caf20 in vivo, as well as the direct phosphorylation of Caf20 by TORC1 in vitro. Furthermore, we found the TORC1-dependent recruitment of Caf20 to the 80S ribosome. Consequently, our study proposes a plausible involvement of yeast's 4E-BP in the efficacy of translation initiation, an aspect under the control of TORC1.

Analysis of domain organization and functional signatures of trypanosomatid keIF4Gs

Translation initiation is the first step in three essential processes leading to protein synthesis. It is carried out by proteins called translation initiation factors and ribosomes on the mRNA. One of the critical translation initiation factors in eukaryotes is eIF4G which is a scaffold protein that helps assemble translation initiation complexes that carry out translation initiation which ultimately leads to polypeptide synthesis. Trypanosomatids are a large family of kinetoplastids, some of which are protozoan parasites that cause diseases in humans through transmission by vectors. While the protein translation mechanisms in eukaryotes and prokaryotes are well understood, the protein translation factors and mechanisms in trypanosomatids are poorly understood necessitating further studies. Unlike other eukaryotes, trypanosomatids contain five eIF4G orthologues with diversity in length and sequences. Here, I have used bioinformatics tools to look at trypanosomatid keIF4G orthologue sequences and report that there are similarities and considerable differences in their domains/motifs organization and signature amino acid sequences that are required for different functions as compared to human eIF4G. My analysis suggests that there is likely to be considerable diversity and complexity in trypanosomatid keIF4G functions as compared to other eukaryotes.

Identification and characterization of the interaction between the methyl-7-guanosine cap maturation enzyme RNMT and the cap-binding protein eIF4E

The control of RNA metabolism is an important aspect of molecular biology with wide-ranging impacts on cells. Central to processing of coding RNAs is the addition of the methyl-7 guanosine (m⁷G) "cap" on their 5' end. The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E directly binds the m⁷G cap and through this interaction plays key roles in many steps of RNA metabolism including nuclear RNA export and translation. eIF4E also stimulates capping of many transcripts through its ability to drive the production of the enzyme RNMT which methylates the G-cap to form the mature m⁷G cap. Here, we found that eIF4E also physically associated with RNMT in human cells. Moreover, eIF4E directly interacted with RNMT in vitro. eIF4E is only the second protein reported to directly bind the methyltransferase domain of RNMT, the first being its co-factor RAM. We combined high-resolution NMR methods with biochemical studies to define the binding interfaces for the RNMT-eIF4E complex. Further, we found that eIF4E competes for RAM binding to RNMT and conversely, RNMT competes for binding of well-established eIF4E-binding partners such as the 4E-BPs. RNMT uses novel structural means to engage eIF4E. Finally, we observed that m⁷G cap-eIF4E-RNMT trimeric complexes form, and thus RNMT-eIF4E complexes may be employed so that eIF4E captures newly capped RNA. In all, we show for the first time that the cap-binding protein eIF4E directly binds to the cap-maturation enzyme RNMT.

Overlapping regions of Caf20 mediate its interactions with the mRNA-5'cap-binding protein eIF4E and with ribosomes

By interacting with the mRNA 5' cap, the translation initiation factor eIF4E plays a critical role in selecting mRNAs for protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells. Caf20 is a member of the family of proteins found across eukaryotes termed 4E-BPs, which compete with eIF4G for interaction with eIF4E. Caf20 independently interacts with ribosomes. Thus, Caf20 modulates the mRNA selection process via poorly understood mechanisms. Here we performed unbiased mutagenesis across Caf20 to characterise which regions of Caf20 are important for interaction with eIF4E and with ribosomes. Caf20 binding to eIF4E is entirely dependent on a canonical motif shared with other 4E-BPs. However, binding to ribosomes is weakened by mutations throughout the protein, suggesting an extended binding interface that partially overlaps with the eIF4E-interaction region. By using chemical crosslinking, we identify a potential ribosome interaction region on the ribosome surface that spans both small and large subunits and is close to a known interaction site of eIF3. The function of ribosome binding by Caf20 remains unclear.

Single-Molecule Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 5' Cap Recognition by Human eIF4F

Coronaviruses initiate translation through recognition of the viral RNA 5' m ⁷ GpppA _m cap by translation factor eIF4F. eIF4F is a heterotrimeric protein complex with cap-binding, RNA-binding, and RNA helicase activities. Modulating eIF4F function through cellular regulation or small-molecule inhibition impacts coronavirus replication, including for SARS-CoV-2. Translation initiation involves highly coordinated dynamics of translation factors with messenger or viral RNA. However, how the eIF4F subunits coordinate on the initiation timescale to define cap-binding efficiency remains incompletely understood. Here we report that translation supported by the SARS-CoV-2 5'-UTR is highly sensitive to eIF4A inhibition by rocaglamide. Through a single-molecule fluorescence approach that reports on eIF4E-cap interaction, we dissect how eIF4F subunits contribute to cap-recognition efficiency on the SARS-CoV-2 5' UTR. We find that free eIF4A enhances cap accessibility for eIF4E binding, but eIF4G alone does not change the kinetics of eIF4E-RNA interaction. Conversely, formation of the full eIF4F complex significantly alters eIF4E-cap interaction, suggesting that coordinated eIF4E and eIF4A activities establish the net eIF4F-cap recognition efficiency. Moreover, the eIF4F complex formed with phosphomimetic eIF4E(S209D) binds the viral UTR more efficiently than with wild-type eIF4E. These results highlight a dynamic interplay of eIF4F subunits and mRNA that determines cap-recognition efficiency.

The translation initiation factor EIF4E5 from Leishmania: crystal structure and interacting partners

The mRNA cap-binding protein, eIF4E, mediates the recognition of the mRNA 5' end and, as part of the heterotrimeric eIF4F complex, facilitates the recruitment of the ribosomal subunits to initiate eukaryotic translation. Various regulatory events involving eIF4E and a second eIF4F subunit, eIF4G, are required for proper control of translation initiation. In pathogenic trypanosomatids, six eIF4Es and five eIF4Gs have been described, several forming different eIF4F-like complexes with yet unresolved roles. EIF4E5 is one of the least known of the trypanosomatid eIF4Es and has not been characterized in Leishmania species. Here, we used immunoprecipitation assays, combined with mass-spectrometry, to identify major EIF4E5 interacting proteins in L. infantum. A constitutively expressed, HA-tagged, EIF4E5 co-precipitated mainly with EIF4G1 and binding partners previously described in Trypanosoma brucei, EIF4G1-IP, RBP43 and the 14-3-3 proteins. In contrast, no clear co-precipitation with EIF4G2, also previously reported, was observed. EIF4E5 also co-precipitated with protein kinases, possibly associated with cell-cycle regulation, selected RNA binding proteins and histones. Phosphorylated residues were identified and mapped to the Leishmania-specific C-terminal end. Mutagenesis of the tryptophan residue (W53) postulated to mediate interactions with protein partners or of a neighbouring tryptophan conserved in Leishmania (W45) did not substantially impair the identified interactions. Finally, the crystal structure of Leishmania EIF4E5 evidences remarkable differences in the eIF4G interfacing region, when compared with human eIF4E-1 and with its Trypanosoma orthologue. Mapping of its C-terminal end near the cap-binding site also imply relevant differences in cap-binding function and/or regulation.

Retinol-binding protein 4 mRNA translation in hepatocytes is enhanced by activation of mTORC1

Increased expression of the peptide hormone retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) has been implicated in the development of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and visual dysfunction. Prior investigations of the mechanisms that influence RBP4 synthesis have focused solely on changes in mRNA abundance. Yet, the production of many secreted proteins is controlled at the level of mRNA translation, as it allows for a rapid and reversible change in expression. Herein, we evaluated Rbp4 mRNA translation using sucrose density gradient centrifugation. In the liver of fasted rodents, Rbp4 mRNA translation was low. In response to refeeding, Rbp4 mRNA translation was enhanced and RBP4 levels in serum were increased. In H4IIE cells, refreshing culture medium promoted Rbp4 mRNA translation and expression of the protein. Rbp4 mRNA abundance was not increased by either experimental manipulation. Enhanced Rbp4 mRNA translation was associated with activation of the kinase mechanistic target of rapamycin in complex 1 (mTORC1) and enhanced phosphorylation of the translational repressor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1). In H4IIE cells, expression of a 4E-BP1 variant that is unable to be phosphorylated by mTORC1 or suppression of mTORC1 with rapamycin attenuated activity of a luciferase reporter encoding the Rbp4 mRNA 5'-untranslated region (UTR). Purine substitutions to disrupt a terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP)-like sequence in the Rbp4 5'-UTR prevented the suppressive effect of rapamycin on reporter activity. Rapamycin also prevented upregulation of Rbp4 mRNA translation in the liver and reduced serum levels of RBP4 in response to feeding. Overall, the findings support a model in which nutrient-induced activation of mTORC1 upregulates Rbp4 mRNA translation to promote RBP4 synthesis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY RBP4 plays a critical role in metabolic disease, yet relatively little is known about the mechanisms that regulate its production. Herein, we provide evidence for translational control of RBP4 synthesis. We demonstrate that activation of the nutrient-sensitive kinase mTORC1 promotes hepatic Rbp4 mRNA translation. The findings support the possibility that targeting Rbp4 mRNA translation represents an alternative to current therapeutic interventions that lower serum RBP4 concentration by promoting urinary excretion of the protein.

The diversity, plasticity, and adaptability of cap-dependent translation initiation and the associated machinery

Translation initiation is a critical facet of gene expression with important impacts that underlie cellular responses to stresses and environmental cues. Its dysregulation in many diseases position this process as an important area for the development of new therapeutics. The gateway translation factor eIF4E is typically considered responsible for ‘global’ or ‘canonical’ m⁷G cap-dependent translation. However, eIF4E impacts translation of specific transcripts rather than the entire translatome. There are many alternative cap-dependent translation mechanisms that also contribute to the translation capacity of the cell. We review the diversity of these, juxtaposing more recently identified mechanisms with eIF4E-dependent modalities. We also explore the multiplicity of functions played by translation factors, both within and outside protein synthesis, and discuss how these differentially contribute to their ultimate physiological impacts. For comparison, we discuss some modalities for cap-independent translation. In all, this review highlights the diverse mechanisms that engage and control translation in eukaryotes.

Computational resources and strategies to assess single-molecule dynamics of the translation process in S. cerevisiae

This work provides a systematic and comprehensive overview of available resources for the molecular-scale modelling of the translation process through agent-based modelling. The case study is the translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, one of the most studied yeasts. The data curation workflow encompassed structural information about the yeast (i.e. the simulation environment), and the proteins, ribonucleic acids and other types of molecules involved in the process (i.e. the agents). Moreover, it covers the main process events, such as diffusion (i.e. motion of molecules in the environment) and collision efficiency (i.e. interaction between molecules). Data previously determined by wet-lab techniques were preferred, resorting to computational predictions/extrapolations only when strictly necessary. The computational modelling of the translation processes is of added industrial interest, since it may bring forward knowledge on how to control such phenomena and enhance the production of proteins of interest in a faster and more efficient manner.

Communication Is Key: 5'-3' Interactions that Regulate mRNA Translation and Turnover

Most eukaryotic mRNAs maintain a 5' cap structure and 3' poly(A) tail, cis-acting elements that are often separated by thousands of nucleotides. Nevertheless, multiple paradigms exist where mRNA 5' and 3' termini interact with each other in order to regulate mRNA translation and turnover. mRNAs recruit translation initiation factors to their termini, which in turn physically interact with each other. This physical bridging of the mRNA termini is known as the "closed loop" model, with years of genetic and biochemical evidence supporting the functional synergy between the 5' cap and 3' poly(A) tail to enhance mRNA translation initiation. However, a number of examples exist of "non-canonical" 5'-3' communication for cellular and viral RNAs that lack 5' cap structures and/or poly(A) tails. Moreover, in several contexts, mRNA 5'-3' communication can function to repress translation. Overall, we detail how various mRNA 5'-3' interactions play important roles in posttranscriptional regulation, wherein depending on the protein factors involved can result in translational stimulation or repression.

Fission Yeast Asc1 Stabilizes the Interaction between Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 3a and Rps0A/uS2 for Protein Synthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase cofactors play important roles in coordinating aminoacylation and translation. In this study, we describe an additional function of the fission yeast aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase cofactor 1 (Asc1) in translation. We found that Asc1 directly binds and stabilizes the interaction between small ribosomal protein Rps0A/uS2 and eukaryotic initiation factor 3a (eIF3a). In the absence of Asc1, the interaction between eIF3a and Rps0A/uS2 was compromised. The interaction between Rps0A/uS2 and eIF3a mediated the 40S ribosomal subunit binding of eIF3 in 43S preinitiation complex formation to stimulate translation initiation. Keeping with this idea, in an asc1 mutant, the association of mRNA with the 40S ribosomal subunit was defective and protein synthesis was compromised. To show that Asc1 is directly involved in translation, we demonstrate that the addition of recombinant Asc1 is able to rescue the translation defect of the asc1 mutant in a cell-free system. Furthermore, this function of Asc1 is likely to be evolutionarily conserved, as a similar interaction with eIF3a and Rps0A/uS2 could be identified in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase cofactors. Together, these results identify a function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase cofactors in translation preinitiation complex formation, which adds significantly to the expanded functions associated with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and their cofactors.

Structural motifs in eIF4G and 4E-BPs modulate their binding to eIF4E to regulate translation initiation in yeast

The interaction of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) with the cap-binding protein eIF4E initiates cap-dependent translation and is regulated by the 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs), which compete with eIF4G to repress translation. Metazoan eIF4G and 4E-BPs interact with eIF4E via canonical and non-canonical motifs that bind to the dorsal and lateral surface of eIF4E in a bipartite recognition mode. However, previous studies pointed to mechanistic differences in how fungi and metazoans regulate protein synthesis. We present crystal structures of the yeast eIF4E bound to two yeast 4E-BPs, p20 and Eap1p, as well as crystal structures of a fungal eIF4E–eIF4G complex. We demonstrate that the core principles of molecular recognition of eIF4E are in fact highly conserved among translational activators and repressors in eukaryotes. Finally, we reveal that highly specialized structural motifs do exist and serve to modulate the affinity of protein-protein interactions that regulate cap-dependent translation initiation in fungi.

The Leishmania PABP1-eIF4E4 interface: a novel 5'-3' interaction architecture for trans-spliced mRNAs

Trans-splicing of trypanosomatid polycistronic transcripts produces polyadenylated monocistronic mRNAs modified to form the 5' cap4 structure (m7Gpppm36,6,2'Apm2'Apm2'Cpm23,2'U). NMR and X-ray crystallography reveal that Leishmania has a unique type of N-terminally-extended cap-binding protein (eIF4E4) that binds via a PAM2 motif to PABP1. This relies on the interactions of a combination of polar and charged amino acid side-chains together with multiple hydrophobic interactions, and underpins a novel architecture in the Leishmania cap4-binding translation factor complex. Measurements using microscale thermophoresis, fluorescence anisotropy and surface plasmon resonance characterize the key interactions driving assembly of the Leishmania translation initiation complex. We demonstrate that this complex can accommodate Leishmania eIF4G3 which, unlike the standard eukaryotic initiation complex paradigm, binds tightly to eIF4E4, but not to PABP1. Thus, in Leishmania, the chain of interactions 5'cap4-eIF4E4-PABP1-poly(A) bridges the mRNA 5' and 3' ends. Exceptionally, therefore, by binding tightly to two protein ligands and to the mRNA 5' cap4 structure, the trypanosomatid N-terminally extended form of eIF4E acts as the core molecular scaffold for the mRNA-cap-binding complex. Finally, the eIF4E4 N-terminal extension is an intrinsically disordered region that transitions to a partly folded form upon binding to PABP1, whereby this interaction is not modulated by poly(A) binding to PABP1.

LARP1 on TOP of ribosome production

The ribosome is an essential unit of all living organisms that commands protein synthesis, ultimately fuelling cell growth (accumulation of cell mass) and cell proliferation (increase in cell number). The eukaryotic ribosome consists of 4 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and 80 ribosomal proteins (RPs). Despite its fundamental role in every living organism, our present understanding of how higher eukaryotes produce the various ribosome components is incomplete. Uncovering the mechanisms utilized by human cells to generate functional ribosomes will likely have far-reaching implications in human disease. Recent biochemical and structural studies revealed La-related protein 1 (LARP1) as a key new player in RP production. LARP1 is an RNA-binding protein that belongs to the LARP superfamily; it controls the translation and stability of the mRNAs that encode RPs and translation factors, which are characterized by a 5' terminal oligopyrimidine (5'TOP) motif and are thus known as TOP mRNAs. The activity of LARP1 is regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1): a eukaryotic protein kinase complex that integrates nutrient sensing with mRNA translation, particularly that of TOP mRNAs. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of LARP1 in the control of ribosome production in multicellular eukaryotes. This article is categorized under: Translation > Translation Regulation RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications RNA Processing > Capping and 5' End Modifications.

Translation initiation by cap-dependent ribosome recruitment: Recent insights and open questions

Gene expression universally relies on protein synthesis, where ribosomes recognize and decode the messenger RNA template by cycling through translation initiation, elongation, and termination phases. All aspects of translation have been studied for decades using the tools of biochemistry and molecular biology available at the time. Here, we focus on the mechanism of translation initiation in eukaryotes, which is remarkably more complex than prokaryotic initiation and is the target of multiple types of regulatory intervention. The "consensus" model, featuring cap-dependent ribosome entry and scanning of mRNA leader sequences, represents the predominantly utilized initiation pathway across eukaryotes, although several variations of the model and alternative initiation mechanisms are also known. Recent advances in structural biology techniques have enabled remarkable molecular-level insights into the functional states of eukaryotic ribosomes, including a range of ribosomal complexes with different combinations of translation initiation factors that are thought to represent bona fide intermediates of the initiation process. Similarly, high-throughput sequencing-based ribosome profiling or "footprinting" approaches have allowed much progress in understanding the elongation phase of translation, and variants of them are beginning to reveal the remaining mysteries of initiation, as well as aspects of translation termination and ribosomal recycling. A current view on the eukaryotic initiation mechanism is presented here with an emphasis on how recent structural and footprinting results underpin axioms of the consensus model. Along the way, we further outline some contested mechanistic issues and major open questions still to be addressed. This article is categorized under: Translation > Translation Mechanisms Translation > Translation Regulation RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

Acute myotube protein synthesis regulation by IL-6-related cytokines

IL-6 and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), members of the IL-6 family of cytokines, play recognized paradoxical roles in skeletal muscle mass regulation, being associated with both growth and atrophy. Overload or muscle contractions can induce a transient increase in muscle IL-6 and LIF expression, which has a regulatory role in muscle hypertrophy. However, the cellular mechanisms involved in this regulation have not been completely identified. The induction of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)-dependent myofiber protein synthesis is an established regulator of muscle hypertrophy, but the involvement of the IL-6 family of cytokines in this process is poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the acute effects of IL-6 and LIF administration on mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis in C2C12 myotubes. The role of glycoprotein 130 (gp130) receptor and downstream signaling pathways, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-mTORC1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3), was investigated by administration of specific siRNA or pharmaceutical inhibitors. Acute administration of IL-6 and LIF induced protein synthesis, which was accompanied by STAT3 activation, Akt-mTORC1 activation, and increased SOCS3 expression. This induction of protein synthesis was blocked by both gp130 siRNA knockdown and Akt inhibition. Interestingly, STAT3 inhibition or Akt downstream mTORC1 signaling inhibition did not fully block the IL-6 or LIF induction of protein synthesis. SOCS3 siRNA knockdown increased basal protein synthesis and extended the duration of the protein synthesis induction by IL-6 and LIF. These results demonstrate that either IL-6 or LIF can activate gp130-Akt signaling axis, which induces protein synthesis via mTORC1-independent mechanisms in cultured myotubes. However, IL-6- or LIF-induced SOCS3 negatively regulates the activation of myotube protein synthesis.

Analysis of the interacting partners eIF4F and 3'-CITE required for Melon necrotic spot virus cap-independent translation

We have shown previously that the translation of Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV, family Tombusviridae, genus Carmovirus) RNAs is controlled by a 3'-cap-independent translation enhancer (CITE), which is genetically and functionally dependent on the eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4E. Here, we describe structural and functional analyses of the MNSV-Mα5 3'-CITE and its translation initiation factor partner. We first mapped the minimal 3'-CITE (Ma5TE) to a 45-nucleotide sequence, which consists of a stem-loop structure with two internal loops, similar to other I-shaped 3'-CITEs. UV crosslinking, followed by gel retardation assays, indicated that Ma5TE interacts in vitro with the complex formed by eIF4E + eIF4G_980-1159 (eIF4F_p20 ), but not with each subunit alone or with eIF4E + eIF4G_1003-1092 , suggesting binding either through interaction with eIF4E following a conformational change induced by its binding to eIF4G_980-1159 , or through a double interaction with eIF4E and eIF4G_980-1159 . Critical residues for this interaction reside in an internal bulge of Ma5TE, so that their mutation abolished binding to eIF4E + eIF4G_1003-1092 and cap-independent translation. We also developed an in vivo system to test the effect of mutations in eIF4E in Ma5TE-driven cap-independent translation, showing that conserved amino acids in a positively charged RNA-binding motif around amino acid position 228, implicated in eIF4E-eIF4G binding or belonging to the cap-recognition pocket, are essential for cap-independent translation controlled by Ma5TE, and thus for the multiplication of MNSV.

Mechanism and Regulation of Protein Synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In this review, we provide an overview of protein synthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae The mechanism of protein synthesis is well conserved between yeast and other eukaryotes, and molecular genetic studies in budding yeast have provided critical insights into the fundamental process of translation as well as its regulation. The review focuses on the initiation and elongation phases of protein synthesis with descriptions of the roles of translation initiation and elongation factors that assist the ribosome in binding the messenger RNA (mRNA), selecting the start codon, and synthesizing the polypeptide. We also examine mechanisms of translational control highlighting the mRNA cap-binding proteins and the regulation of GCN4 and CPA1 mRNAs.

mRNA length-sensing in eukaryotic translation: reconsidering the "closed loop" and its implications for translational control

Most eukaryotic mRNAs are recruited to the ribosome by recognition of a 5' m⁷GpppN cap. 30 years of genetic and biochemical evidence point to a role for interaction between the 5' cap-interacting factors and the 3' poly(A)-binding protein in bringing the ends of the mRNA into close proximity and promoting both translation and stability of the mRNA, in a form known as the "closed loop". However, the results of recent RNA-protein interaction studies suggest that not all mRNAs have equal access to the closed loop factors. Furthermore, association with closed loop factors appears to be highly biased towards mRNAs with short open reading frames, echoing the trend for higher translation of short mRNAs that has been observed in many eukaryotes. We recently reported that the ribosomal signaling scaffold protein RACK1 promotes the efficient translation of short mRNAs that strongly associate with the closed loop factors. Here, we discuss the implications of these observations with respect to translational control and suggest avenues through which the universality of the closed loop in eukaryotic translation could be revisited.

Minimum-noise production of translation factor eIF4G maps to a mechanistically determined optimal rate control window for protein synthesis

Gene expression noise influences organism evolution and fitness. The mechanisms determining the relationship between stochasticity and the functional role of translation machinery components are critical to viability. eIF4G is an essential translation factor that exerts strong control over protein synthesis. We observe an asymmetric, approximately bell-shaped, relationship between the average intracellular abundance of eIF4G and rates of cell population growth and global mRNA translation, with peak rates occurring at normal physiological abundance. This relationship fits a computational model in which eIF4G is at the core of a multi-component–complex assembly pathway. This model also correctly predicts a plateau-like response of translation to super-physiological increases in abundance of the other cap-complex factors, eIF4E and eIF4A. Engineered changes in eIF4G abundance amplify noise, demonstrating that minimum stochasticity coincides with physiological abundance of this factor. Noise is not increased when eIF4E is overproduced. Plasmid-mediated synthesis of eIF4G imposes increased global gene expression stochasticity and reduced viability because the intrinsic noise for this factor influences total cellular gene noise. The naturally evolved eIF4G gene expression noise minimum maps within the optimal activity zone dictated by eIF4G's mechanistic role. Rate control and noise are therefore interdependent and have co-evolved to share an optimal physiological abundance point.

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E wears a "cap" for many occasions

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E plays important roles in controlling the composition of the proteome. Indeed, dysregulation of eIF4E is associated with poor prognosis cancers. The traditional view has been that eIF4E acts solely in translation. However, over the last ∼25 years, eIF4E was found in the nucleus where it acts in mRNA export and in the last ∼10 years, eIF4E was found in cytoplasmic processing bodies (P-bodies) where it functions in mRNA sequestration and stability. The common biochemical thread for these activities is the ability of eIF4E to bind the 7-methylguanosine cap on the 5′ end of mRNAs. Recently, the possibility that eIF4E directly binds some mRNA elements independently of the cap has also been raised. Importantly, the effects of eIF4E are not genome-wide with a subset of transcripts targeted depending on the presence of specific mRNA elements and context-dependent regulatory factors. Indeed, eIF4E governs RNA regulons through co-regulating the expression of groups of transcripts acting in the same biochemical pathways. In addition, studies over the past ∼15 years indicate that there are multiple strategies that regulatory factors employ to modulate eIF4E activities in context-dependent manners. This perspective focuses on these new findings and incorporates them into a broader model for eIF4E function.

The molecular choreography of protein synthesis: translational control, regulation, and pathways

Translation of proteins by the ribosome regulates gene expression, with recent results underscoring the importance of translational control. Misregulation of translation underlies many diseases, including cancer and many genetic diseases. Decades of biochemical and structural studies have delineated many of the mechanistic details in prokaryotic translation, and sketched the outlines of eukaryotic translation. However, translation may not proceed linearly through a single mechanistic pathway, but likely involves multiple pathways and branchpoints. The stochastic nature of biological processes would allow different pathways to occur during translation that are biased by the interaction of the ribosome with other translation factors, with many of the steps kinetically controlled. These multiple pathways and branchpoints are potential regulatory nexus, allowing gene expression to be tuned at the translational level. As research focus shifts toward eukaryotic translation, certain themes will be echoed from studies on prokaryotic translation. This review provides a general overview of the dynamic data related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic translation, in particular recent findings with single-molecule methods, complemented by biochemical, kinetic, and structural findings. We will underscore the importance of viewing the process through the viewpoints of regulation, translational control, and heterogeneous pathways.

BTG4 is a meiotic cell cycle-coupled maternal-zygotic-transition licensing factor in oocytes

The mRNAs stored in oocytes undergo general decay during the maternal-zygotic transition (MZT), and their stability is tightly interconnected with meiotic cell-cycle progression. However, the factors that trigger decay of maternal mRNA and couple this event to oocyte meiotic maturation remain elusive. Here, we identified B-cell translocation gene-4 (BTG4) as an MZT licensing factor in mice. BTG4 bridged CNOT7, a catalytic subunit of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase, to eIF4E, a key translation initiation factor, and facilitated decay of maternal mRNA. Btg4-null females produced morphologically normal oocytes but were infertile, owing to early developmental arrest. The intrinsic MAP kinase cascade in oocytes triggered translation of Btg4 mRNA stored in fully grown oocytes by targeting the 3' untranslated region, thereby coupling CCR4-NOT deadenylase-mediated decay of maternal mRNA with oocyte maturation and fertilization. This is a key step in oocyte cytoplasmic maturation that determines the developmental potential of mammalian embryos.

Virus-induced translational arrest through 4EBP1/2-dependent decay of 5'-TOP mRNAs restricts viral infection

The mosquito-transmitted bunyavirus, Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), is a highly successful pathogen for which there are no vaccines or therapeutics. Translational arrest is a common antiviral strategy used by hosts. In response, RVFV inhibits two well-known antiviral pathways that attenuate translation during infection, PKR and type I IFN signaling. Despite this, translational arrest occurs during RVFV infection by unknown mechanisms. Here, we find that RVFV infection triggers the decay of core translation machinery mRNAs that possess a 5'-terminal oligopyrimidine (5'-TOP) motif in their 5'-UTR, including mRNAs encoding ribosomal proteins, which leads to a decrease in overall ribosomal protein levels. We find that the RNA decapping enzyme NUDT16 selectively degrades 5'-TOP mRNAs during RVFV infection and this decay is triggered in response to mTOR attenuation via the translational repressor 4EBP1/2 axis. Translational arrest of 5'-TOPs via 4EBP1/2 restricts RVFV replication, and this increased RNA decay results in the loss of visible RNA granules, including P bodies and stress granules. Because RVFV cap-snatches in RNA granules, the increased level of 5'-TOP mRNAs in this compartment leads to snatching of these targets, which are translationally suppressed during infection. Therefore, translation of RVFV mRNAs is compromised by multiple mechanisms during infection. Together, these data present a previously unknown mechanism for translational shutdown in response to viral infection and identify mTOR attenuation as a potential therapeutic avenue against bunyaviral infection.

The 4E-BP Caf20p Mediates Both eIF4E-Dependent and Independent Repression of Translation

Translation initiation factor eIF4E mediates mRNA selection for protein synthesis via the mRNA 5'cap. A family of binding proteins, termed the 4E-BPs, interact with eIF4E to hinder ribosome recruitment. Mechanisms underlying mRNA specificity for 4E-BP control remain poorly understood. Saccharomyces cerevisiae 4E-BPs, Caf20p and Eap1p, each regulate an overlapping set of mRNAs. We undertook global approaches to identify protein and RNA partners of both 4E-BPs by immunoprecipitation of tagged proteins combined with mass spectrometry or next-generation sequencing. Unexpectedly, mass spectrometry indicated that the 4E-BPs associate with many ribosomal proteins. 80S ribosome and polysome association was independently confirmed and was not dependent upon interaction with eIF4E, as mutated forms of both Caf20p and Eap1p with disrupted eIF4E-binding motifs retain ribosome interaction. Whole-cell proteomics revealed Caf20p mutations cause both up and down-regulation of proteins and that many changes were independent of the 4E-binding motif. Investigations into Caf20p mRNA targets by immunoprecipitation followed by RNA sequencing revealed a strong association between Caf20p and mRNAs involved in transcription and cell cycle processes, consistent with observed cell cycle phenotypes of mutant strains. A core set of over 500 Caf20p-interacting mRNAs comprised of both eIF4E-dependent (75%) and eIF4E-independent targets (25%), which differ in sequence attributes. eIF4E-independent mRNAs share a 3' UTR motif. Caf20p binds all tested motif-containing 3' UTRs. Caf20p and the 3'UTR combine to influence ERS1 mRNA polysome association consistent with Caf20p contributing to translational control. Finally ERS1 3'UTR confers Caf20-dependent repression of expression to a heterologous reporter gene. Taken together, these data reveal conserved features of eIF4E-dependent Caf20p mRNA targets and uncover a novel eIF4E-independent mode of Caf20p binding to mRNAs that extends the regulatory role of Caf20p in the mRNA-specific repression of protein synthesis beyond its interaction with eIF4E.

eIF4E-binding proteins: new factors, new locations, new roles

The cap-binding translation initiation factor eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E) is central to protein synthesis in eukaryotes. As an integral component of eIF4F, a complex also containing the large bridging factor eIF4G and eIF4A RNA helicase, eIF4E enables the recruitment of the small ribosomal subunit to the 5' end of mRNAs. The interaction between eIF4E and eIF4G via a YXXXXLϕ motif is regulated by small eIF4E-binding proteins, 4E-BPs, which use the same sequence to competitively bind eIF4E thereby inhibiting cap-dependent translation. Additional eIF4E-binding proteins have been identified in the last 10-15 years, characterized by the YXXXXLϕ motif, and by interactions (many of which remain to be detailed) with RNA-binding proteins, or other factors in complexes that recognize the specific mRNAs. In the present article, we focus on the metazoan 4E-T (4E-transporter)/Cup family of eIF4E-binding proteins, and also discuss very recent examples in yeast, fruitflies and humans, some of which predictably inhibit translation, while others may result in mRNA decay or even enhance translation; altogether considerably expanding our understanding of the roles of eIF4E-binding proteins in gene expression regulation.

4E-BPs require non-canonical 4E-binding motifs and a lateral surface of eIF4E to repress translation

eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) are a widespread class of translational regulators that share a canonical (C) eIF4E-binding motif (4E-BM) with eIF4G. Consequently, 4E-BPs compete with eIF4G for binding to the dorsal surface on eIF4E to inhibit translation initiation. Some 4E-BPs contain non-canonical 4E-BMs (NC 4E-BMs), but the contribution of these motifs to the repressive mechanism—and whether these motifs are present in all 4E-BPs—remains unknown. Here, we show that the three annotated Drosophila melanogaster 4E-BPs contain NC 4E-BMs. These motifs bind to a lateral surface on eIF4E that is not used by eIF4G. This distinct molecular recognition mode is exploited by 4E-BPs to dock onto eIF4E–eIF4G complexes and effectively displace eIF4G from the dorsal surface of eIF4E. Our data reveal a hitherto unrecognized role for the NC4E-BMs and the lateral surface of eIF4E in 4E-BP-mediated translational repression, and suggest that bipartite 4E-BP mimics might represent efficient therapeutic tools to dampen translation during oncogenic transformation.

eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) are a conserved class of translational repressors that play essential roles in the regulation of protein expression. Here, Igreja et al. indentify non-canonical interactions between 4E-BPs and eIF4E that are required to effectively displace eIF4G and inhibit translation.

Cap-dependent translation initiation factor, eIF4E, is the target for Ouabain-mediated inhibition of HIF-1α

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), a heterodimeric transcription factor that mediates the adaptation of tumor cells and tissues to the hypoxic microenvironment, has attracted considerable interest as a potential therapeutic target. Recently, HIF-1α has been recognized as the critical target of cardiac glycosides for cancer therapy, but the molecular mechanism of cardiac glycosides' inhibition of HIF-1α is still poorly understood. In the present study, we observed that neither HIF-1α mRNA levels nor HIF-1α protein degradation are affected by Ouabain. However, Ouabain was found to be associated with the regulation of HIF-1α translation. Basing on in silico, in vitro and ex vivo models of translation processing, further studies revealed that eIF4E plays a critical role in the inhibitory effect of Ouabain on HIF-1α protein synthesis, rather than mTORC1, eIF2α signaling or Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase inhibition. Mechanistically, Ouabain directly binds eIF4E, disrupts eIF4E/eIF4G association (200 μM, Inhibit rate =61 ± 3%) but not the eIF4E/mRNA complex formation (200 μM, Inhibit rate =18 ± 5%) both in vitro and in cells, thereby inhibiting the intracellular cap-dependent translation. The association between Ouabain and eIF4E not only raises the hope of using cardiac glycosides for cancer therapeutics more rational, but also offers a pharmacologic means for developing novel anti-cancer HIF-1α antagonists.

Eukaryotic translation initiation is controlled by cooperativity effects within ternary complexes of 4E-BP1, eIF4E, and the mRNA 5' cap

Initiation is the rate-limiting step during mRNA 5' cap-dependent translation, and thus a target of a strict control in the eukaryotic cell. It is shown here by analytical ultracentrifugation and fluorescence spectroscopy that the affinity of the human translation inhibitor, eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP1), to the translation initiation factor 4E is significantly higher when eIF4E is bound to the cap. The 4E-BP1 binding stabilizes the active eIF4E conformation and, on the other hand, can facilitate dissociation of eIF4E from the cap. These findings reveal the particular allosteric effects forming a thermodynamic cycle for the cooperative regulation of the translation initiation inhibition.

Conformational changes induced in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E by a clinically relevant inhibitor, ribavirin triphosphate

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E is highly elevated in human cancers including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A potential anticancer agent, ribavirin, targets eIF4E activity in AML patients corresponding to clinical responses. To date, ribavirin is the only direct inhibitor of eIF4E to reach clinical trials. We showed that ribavirin acts as a competitive inhibitor of the methyl 7-guanosine (m(7)G) cap, the natural ligand of eIF4E. Here we examine the conformational changes occurring in human eIF4E upon binding the active metabolite of ribavirin, ribavirin triphosphate (RTP). Our NMR data revealed an unexpected concentration dependence on RTP affinity for eIF4E. We observed NMR spectra characteristic of tight binding at low micromolar concentrations (2-5 μM eIF4E) but much weaker affinity at more typical NMR concentrations (50- ). Comparison of chemical shift perturbation and line broadening suggest that the two eIF4E-RTP complexes differ in the precise positioning of RTP within the cap binding pocket, with the high affinity complex showing more extensive changes to the central β-sheet and dorsal surface of eIF4E, similar to m(7)G cap. The differences between high and low affinity complexes arise due to concentration dependent aggregation of eIF4E and RTP. Given the intracellular concentrations of eIF4E and RTP and the differential binding toward the W56A eIF4E mutant the high affinity complex is the most physiologically relevant. In summary, these findings demonstrate that RTP binds in the cap-binding site but also suggests new features of this pocket that should be considered in drug design efforts and reveal new insights into ligand eIF4E recognition.

The oncogene eIF4E: using biochemical insights to target cancer

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E is overexpressed in many human malignancies where it is typically a harbinger of poor prognosis. eIF4E is positioned as a nexus in post-transcriptional gene expression. To carry out these functions, eIF4E needs to bind the m(7)G cap moiety on mRNAs. It plays critical roles in mRNA translation, mRNA export, and most likely in mRNA stability as well. Through these activities, eIF4E coordinately modulates the expression of many transcripts involved in proliferation and survival. eIF4E function is controlled by interactions with protein cofactors in concert with many signaling pathways, including Ras, Mnk, Erk, MAPK, PI3K, mTOR, and Akt. This review describes the eIF4E activity and provides several examples of cellular control mechanisms. Further, we describe some therapeutic strategies in preclinical and clinical development.

Surface plasmon resonance sensing of nucleic acids: a review

Biosensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) have become a central tool for the investigation and quantification of biomolecules and their interactions. Nucleic acids (NAs) play a vital role in numerous biological processes and therefore have been one of the major groups of biomolecules targeted by the SPR biosensors. This paper discusses the advances of NA SPR biosensor technology and reviews its applications both in the research of molecular interactions involving NAs (NA-NA, NA-protein, NA-small molecule), as well as for the field of bioanalytics in the areas of food safety, medical diagnosis and environmental monitoring.

Poly(A) binding proteins: are they all created equal?

The PABP family of proteins were originally thought of as a simple shield for the mRNA poly(A) tail. Years of research have shown that PABPs interact not only with the poly(A) tail, but also with specific sequences in the mRNA, having a general and specific role on the metabolism of different mRNAs. The complexity of PABPs function is increased by the interactions of PABPs with factors involved in different cellular functions. PABPs participate in all the metabolic pathways of the mRNA: polyadenylation/deadenylation, mRNA export, mRNA surveillance, translation, mRNA degradation, microRNA-associated regulation, and regulation of expression during development. In this review, we update information on the roles of PABPs and emerging data on the specific interactions of PABP homologs. Specific functions of individual members of PABPC family in development and viral infection are beginning to be elucidated. However, the interactions are complex and recent evidence for exchange of nuclear and cytoplasmic forms of the proteins, as well as post-translational modifications, emphasize the possibilities for fine-tuning the PABP metabolic network.

eIF4E is an important determinant of adhesion and pseudohyphal growth of the yeast S. cerevisiae

eIF4E, the cytoplasmatic cap-binding protein, is required for efficient cap-dependent translation. We have studied the influence of mutations that alter the activity and/or expression level of eIF4E on haploid and diploid cells in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Temperature-sensitive eIF4E mutants with reduced levels of expression and reduced cap-binding affinity clearly show a loss in haploid adhesion and diploid pseudohyphenation upon starvation for nitrogen. Some of these mutations affect the interaction of the cap-structure of mRNAs with the cap-binding groove of eIF4E. The observed reduction in adhesive and pseudohyphenating properties is less evident for an eIF4E mutant that shows reduced interaction with p20 (an eIF4E-binding protein) or for a p20-knockout mutant. Loss of adhesive and pseudohyphenating properties was not only observed for eIF4E mutants but also for knockout mutants of components of eIF4F such as eIF4B and eIF4G1. We conclude from these experiments that mutations that affect components of the eIF4F-complex loose properties such as adhesion and pseudohyphal differentiation, most likely due to less effective translation of required mRNAs for such processes.

Crystal structure of a minimal eIF4E-Cup complex reveals a general mechanism of eIF4E regulation in translational repression

Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP) that plays a central role in translational regulation of localized mRNAs during early Drosophila development. In particular, Cup is required for repressing translation of the maternally contributed oskar, nanos, and gurken mRNAs, all of which are essential for embryonic body axis determination. Here, we present the 2.8 Å resolution crystal structure of a minimal eIF4E-Cup assembly, consisting of the interacting regions of the two proteins. In the structure, two separate segments of Cup contact two orthogonal faces of eIF4E. The eIF4E-binding consensus motif of Cup (YXXXXLΦ) binds the convex side of eIF4E similarly to the consensus of other eIF4E-binding proteins, such as 4E-BPs and eIF4G. The second, noncanonical, eIF4E-binding site of Cup binds laterally and perpendicularly to the eIF4E β-sheet. Mutations of Cup at this binding site were shown to reduce binding to eIF4E and to promote the destabilization of the associated mRNA. Comparison with the binding mode of eIF4G to eIF4E suggests that Cup and eIF4G binding would be mutually exclusive at both binding sites. This shows how a common molecular surface of eIF4E might recognize different proteins acting at different times in the same pathway. The structure provides insight into the mechanism by which Cup disrupts eIF4E-eIF4G interaction and has broader implications for understanding the role of 4E-BPs in translational regulation.

Diversity of Eukaryotic Translational Initiation Factor eIF4E in Protists

The greatest diversity of eukaryotic species is within the microbial eukaryotes, the protists, with plants and fungi/metazoa representing just two of the estimated seventy five lineages of eukaryotes. Protists are a diverse group characterized by unusual genome features and a wide range of genome sizes from 8.2 Mb in the apicomplexan parasite Babesia bovis to 112,000-220,050 Mb in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum micans. Protists possess numerous cellular, molecular and biochemical traits not observed in “text-book” model organisms. These features challenge some of the concepts and assumptions about the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. Like multicellular eukaryotes, many protists encode multiple eIF4Es, but few functional studies have been undertaken except in parasitic species. An earlier phylogenetic analysis of protist eIF4Es indicated that they cannot be grouped within the three classes that describe eIF4E family members from multicellular organisms. Many more protist sequences are now available from which three clades can be recognized that are distinct from the plant/fungi/metazoan classes. Understanding of the protist eIF4Es will be facilitated as more sequences become available particularly for the under-represented opisthokonts and amoebozoa. Similarly, a better understanding of eIF4Es within each clade will develop as more functional studies of protist eIF4Es are completed.

A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation

The mTOR Complex 1 (mTORC1) kinase nucleates a pathway that promotes cell growth and proliferation and is the target of rapamycin, a drug with many clinical uses¹. mTORC1 regulates mRNA translation, but the overall translational program is poorly defined and no unifying model exists to explain how mTORC1 differentially controls the translation of specific mRNAs. Here we use high-resolution transcriptome-scale ribosome profiling to monitor translation in cells acutely treated with the mTOR inhibitor Torin1, which, unlike rapamycin, fully inhibits mTORC1². These data reveal a surprisingly simple view of the mRNA features and mechanisms that confer mTORC1-dependent translation control. The subset of mRNAs that are specifically regulated by mTORC1 consists almost entirely of transcripts with established 5′ terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) motifs, or, like Hsp90ab1 and Ybx1, with previously unrecognized TOP or related TOP-like motifs that we identified. We find no evidence to support proposals that mTORC1 preferentially regulates mRNAs with increased 5′ UTR length or complexity³. mTORC1 phosphorylates a myriad of translational regulators, but how it controls TOP mRNA translation is unknown⁴. Remarkably, loss of just the well-characterized mTORC1 substrates, the 4E-BP family of translational repressors, is sufficient to render TOP and TOP-like mRNA translation resistant to Torin1. The 4E-BPs inhibit translation initiation by interfering with the interaction between the cap-binding protein eIF4E and eIF4G1. Loss of this interaction diminishes the capacity of eIF4E to bind TOP and TOP-like mRNAs much more than other mRNAs, explaining why mTOR inhibition selectively suppresses their translation. Our results clarify the translational program controlled by mTORC1 and identify 4E-BPs and eIF4G1 as its master effectors.

Cap-dependent translation initiation factor eIF4E: an emerging anticancer drug target

Cancer cells tend to be more highly dependent on cap‐dependent translation than normal tissues. Thus, proteins involved in the initiation of cap‐dependent translation have emerged as potential anti‐cancer drug targets. Cap‐dependent translation is initiated by the binding of the factor eIF4E to the cap domain of mRNA. Detailed x‐ray crystal and NMR structures are available for eIF4E in association with cap‐analogs, as well as domains of other initiation factors. This review will summarize efforts to design potential antagonist of eIF4E that could be used as new pharmacological tools and anti‐cancer agents and. Insights drawn from these studies should aid in the design of future inhibitors of eIF4E dependent translation initiation. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev., 32, No. 4, 786‐814, 2012

Structural insights into the allosteric effects of 4EBP1 on the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E plays key roles in cap-dependent translation and mRNA export. These functions rely on binding the 7-methyl-guanosine moiety (5'cap) on the 5'-end of all mRNAs. eIF4E is regulated by proteins such as eIF4G and eIF4E binding proteins (4EBPs) that bind the dorsal surface of eIF4E, distal to the cap binding site, and modulate cap binding activity. Both proteins increase the affinity of eIF4E for 5'cap. Our understanding of the allosteric effects and structural underpinnings of 4EBP1 or eIF4G binding can be advanced by obtaining structural data on cap-free eIF4E bound to one of these proteins. Here, we report the crystal structure of apo-eIF4E and cap-free eIF4E in complex with a 4EBP1 peptide. We also monitored 4EBP1 binding to cap-free eIF4E in solution using NMR. Together, these studies suggest that 4EBP1 transforms eIF4E into a cap-receptive state. NMR methods were also used to compare the allosteric routes activated by 4EBP1, eIF4G, and the arenavirus Z protein, a negative regulator of cap binding. We observed chemical shift perturbation at the dorsal binding site leading to alterations in the core of the protein, which were ultimately communicated to the unoccupied cap binding site of eIF4E. There were notable similarities between the routes taken by 4EBP1 and eIF4G and differences from the negative regulator Z. Thus, binding of 4EBP1 or eIF4G allosterically drives alterations throughout the protein that increase the affinity of eIF4E for the 5'cap.

RNA polymerase II subunits link transcription and mRNA decay to translation

Little is known about crosstalk between the eukaryotic transcription and translation machineries that operate in different cell compartments. The yeast proteins Rpb4p and Rpb7p represent one such link as they form a heterodimer that shuttles between the nucleus, where it functions in transcription, and the cytoplasm, where it functions in the major mRNA decay pathways. Here we show that the Rpb4/7 heterodimer interacts physically and functionally with components of the translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3), and is required for efficient translation initiation. Efficient translation in the cytoplasm depends on association of Rpb4/7 with RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in the nucleus, leading to a model in which Pol II remotely controls translation. Hence, like in prokaryotes, the eukaryotic translation is coupled to transcription. We propose that Rpb4/7, through its interactions at each step in the mRNA lifecycle, represents a class of factors, "mRNA coordinators," which integrate the various stages of gene expression into a system.

Requirement of RNA binding of mammalian eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4GI (eIF4GI) for efficient interaction of eIF4E with the mRNA cap

Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5'-terminal cap structure (cap), m(7)GpppN, which facilitates ribosome binding. The cap is bound by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which is composed of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A. eIF4E is the cap-binding subunit, eIF4A is an RNA helicase, and eIF4G is a scaffolding protein that bridges between the mRNA and ribosome. eIF4G contains an RNA-binding domain, which was suggested to stimulate eIF4E interaction with the cap in mammals. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, such an effect was not observed. Here, we used recombinant proteins to reconstitute the cap binding of the mammalian eIF4E-eIF4GI complex to investigate the importance of the RNA-binding region of eIF4GI for cap interaction with eIF4E. We demonstrate that chemical cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity. Furthermore, the fusion of RNA recognition motif 1 (RRM1) of the La autoantigen to the N terminus of eIF4GI confers enhanced association between the cap structure and eIF4E. These results demonstrate that eIF4GI serves to anchor eIF4E to the mRNA and enhance its interaction with the cap structure.

Cap-dependent translation initiation and memory

It is widely accepted that changes in gene expression contribute to enduring modifications of synaptic strength and are required for long-term memory. This is an exciting, wide-open area of research at this moment, one of those areas where it is clear that important work is underway but where the surface has just been scratched in terms of our understanding. Much attention has been given to the mechanisms of gene transcription; however, the regulation of transcription is only one route of manipulating gene expression. Regulation of mRNA translation is another route, and is the ultimate step in the control of gene expression, enabling cells to regulate protein production without altering mRNA synthesis or transport. One of the main advantages of this mechanism over transcriptional control in the nucleus lies in the fact that it endows local sites with independent decision-making authority, a consideration that is of particular relevance in neurons with complex synapto-dendritic architecture. There are a growing number of groups that are taking on the challenge of identifying the mechanisms responsible for regulating the process of mRNA translation during synaptic plasticity and memory formation. In this chapter we will discuss what has been discovered with regard to the localization and regulation of mRNA translation during specific types of neuronal activity in the mammalian central nervous system. The data are most complete for cap-dependent translation; therefore, particular attention will be paid to the machinery that initiates cap-dependent translation and its regulation during synaptic plasticity as well as the behavioral phenotypes consequent to its dysregulation.

Mutational analysis of plant cap-binding protein eIF4E reveals key amino acids involved in biochemical functions and potyvirus infection

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) (the cap-binding protein) is involved in natural resistance against several potyviruses in plants. In lettuce, the recessive resistance genes mo1(1) and mo1(2) against Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV) are alleles coding for forms of eIF4E unable, or less effective, to support virus accumulation. A recombinant LMV expressing the eIF4E of a susceptible lettuce variety from its genome was able to produce symptoms in mo1(1) or mo1(2) varieties. In order to identify the eIF4E amino acid residues necessary for viral infection, we constructed recombinant LMV expressing eIF4E with point mutations affecting various amino acids and compared the abilities of these eIF4E mutants to complement LMV infection in resistant plants. Three types of mutations were produced in order to affect different biochemical functions of eIF4E: cap binding, eIF4G binding, and putative interaction with other virus or host proteins. Several mutations severely reduced the ability of eIF4E to complement LMV accumulation in a resistant host and impeded essential eIF4E functions in yeast. However, the ability of eIF4E to bind a cap analogue or to fully interact with eIF4G appeared unlinked to LMV infection. In addition to providing a functional mutational map of a plant eIF4E, this suggests that the role of eIF4E in the LMV cycle might be distinct from its physiological function in cellular mRNA translation.

Kinetic mechanism for assembly of the m7GpppG.eIF4E.eIF4G complex

Interaction of the mRNA cap with the translational machinery is a critical and early step in the initiation of protein synthesis. To better understand this process, we determined kinetic constants for the interaction of m(7)GpppG with human eIF4E by stopped-flow fluorescence quenching in the presence of a 90-amino acid fragment of human eIF4G that contains the eIF4E-binding domain (eIF4G(557-646)). The values obtained, k(on) = 179 x 10(6) m(-1) s(-1) and k(off) = 79 s(-1), were the same as reported previously in the absence of an eIF4G-derived peptide. We also used surface plasmon resonance to determine kinetic constants for the binding of eIF4E to eIF4G(557-646), both in the presence and absence of m(7)GpppG. The results indicated that eIF4G(557-646) binds eIF4E and eIF4E.m(7)GpppG at the same rate, with k(on) = 3 x 10(6) m(-1) s(-1) and k(off) = 0.01 s(-1). Our data represent the first full kinetic description of the interaction of eIF4E with its two specific ligands. The results demonstrate that the formation of the m(7)GpppG.eIF4E.eIF4G(557-646) complex obeys a sequential, random kinetic mechanism and that there is no preferential pathway for its formation. Thus, even though eIF4G(557-646) binds eIF4E tightly, it does not increase the affinity of eIF4E for m(7)GpppG, as has been claimed in several previous publications. We did, in fact, observe increased binding to m(7)GTP-Sepharose in the presence of eIF4G(557-646), but only with recombinant eIF4E that was prepared from inclusion bodies.

Distributed control for recruitment, scanning and subunit joining steps of translation initiation

Protein synthesis utilizes a large proportion of the available free energy in the eukaryotic cell and must be precisely controlled, yet up to now there has been no systematic rate control analysis of the in vivo process. We now present a novel study of rate control by eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) using yeast strains in which chromosomal eIF genes have been placed under the control of the tetO7 promoter system. The results reveal that, contrary to previously published reports, control of the initiation pathway is distributed over all of the eIFs, whereby rate control (the magnitude of their respective component control coefficients) follows the order: eIF4G > eIF1A > eIF4E > eIF5B. The apparent rate control effects of eIFs observed in standard cell-free extract experiments, on the other hand, do not accurately reflect the steady state in vivo data. Overall, this work establishes the first quantitative control framework for the study of in vivo eukaryotic translation.

Identifying small molecule inhibitors of eukaryotic translation initiation

In eukaryotes, translation initiation is rate-limiting with much regulation exerted at the ribosome recruitment and ternary complex (eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNA(i)(Met)) formation steps. Although small molecule inhibitors have been extremely useful for chemically dissecting translation, there is a dearth of compounds available to study the initiation phase in vitro and in vivo. In this chapter, we describe reverse and forward chemical genetic screens developed to identify new inhibitors of translation. The ability to manipulate cell extracts biochemically, and to compare the activity of small molecules on translation of mRNA templates that differ in their factor requirements for ribosome recruitment, facilitates identification of the relevant target.