Acute, periprocedural and longterm antithrombotic therapy in older adults: 2022 Update by the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis

Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

The optimal long-term antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains uncertain. Individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had variations in their reported results and were not powered for effectiveness outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to pool the results of RCTs comparing the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation (OAC) monotherapy vs OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients with AF and stable CAD.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov until September 09, 2024. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or death. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. We obtained unpublished results from principal investigators of the included RCTs, as needed, to calculate pooled HRs and 95% CIs and to perform prespecified subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Among 690 screened records, 4 RCTs with 4,092 randomized patients were included (2 using edoxaban, 1 using rivaroxaban, and 1 using any oral anticoagulant; mean age 73.9 years, 20.1% women). The median follow-up durations ranged from 12 to 30 months (overall estimated weighted mean follow-up of 21.9 months). There were no statistically significant differences between OAC monotherapy vs OAC plus SAPT in the primary effectiveness outcome (7.3% vs 8.2%; HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.72-1.12), myocardial infarction (1.0% vs 0.7%; HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.75-3.04), ischemic stroke (1.9% vs 2.1%; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.57-1.37), all-cause death (4.2% vs 5.3%; HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.49-1.80), or cardiovascular death (2.4% vs 3.0%; HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54-1.15). OAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding than OAC plus SAPT (3.3% vs 5.7%; HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.44-0.79). Subgroup analyses did not show significant interactions for effectiveness but suggested that the magnitude of bleeding reduction may be greater among men (Pinteraction = 0.03) and among patients with diabetes mellitus (Pinteraction = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF and stable CAD, OAC monotherapy, compared with OAC plus SAPT, was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of ischemic events but resulted in a significantly reduced risk of bleeding.

Association of rivaroxaban plasma trough concentrations with clinical characteristics and outcomes

Background

Rivaroxaban use has increased significantly among older adults; however, no definitive plasma concentration thresholds for bleeding or thrombosis have been established. However, dose adjustments for this population remain controversial.

Methods

Between January 2022 and August 2023, we analyzed trough plasma samples from hospitalized patients treated with rivaroxaban for at least three consecutive days. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, and adverse events, were extracted from electronic medical records. The plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses were performed to identify factors influencing rivaroxaban exposure and clinical outcomes.

Results

Among 360 plasma samples analyzed (55% male; median age: 72 years), age (P = 0.042) and renal function (P = 0.002) were significant predictors of rivaroxaban concentration-to-dose ratio. Bleeding events were associated with higher trough concentrations (median: 81.85 ng/mL in the bleeding group vs. 26.80 ng/mL in others; P < 0.001) and were more common in patients with malignancies or prior bleeding history. Thrombotic events occurred predominantly in older patients with a history of stroke (P < 0.05). Patients who died were older and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (P < 0.05), prolonged prothrombin times (P < 0.001), and multiple comorbidities.

Conclusion

Routine monitoring of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations may improve safety in older adults with multiple comorbidities or impaired hepatic, renal, or coagulation functions. Further research is required to establish specific therapeutic thresholds for bleeding and thrombosis.

Perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulants in patients having a high-bleed-risk surgery or neuraxial procedure: the Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE)-2 pilot randomized trial

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and require elective high-bleed-risk surgery, including those who are undergoing a neuraxial or deep peripheral nerve block procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this pilot trial were to provide preliminary data as to pre-operative residual DOAC levels with different management strategies andro assess the feasibility of a larger trial.

METHODS

The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE)-2 pilot trial was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized controlled trial that assessed the feasibility of comparing perioperative DOAC management using an American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA)-based or PAUSE-based approach in patients with atrial fibrillation who needed an elective high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure and/or any neuraxial anesthesia/procedure.

RESULTS

There were 159 patients enrolled (86 on apixaban, 12 on dabigatran, and 61 on rivaroxaban), of whom 141 had preoperative DOAC-level testing done. The median (IQR) residual DOAC level was 19 (19-24) ng/mL in the ASRA group and 20 (19-24) ng/mL in the PAUSE group (standardized difference = -0.02). The percentage of patients in the ASRA and PAUSE groups with preoperative residual DOAC levels < 30 ng/mL was 95.6% and 94.4%, respectively; the percentage with residual DOAC levels of 30 to 50 ng/mL was 1.4% and 2.8%, respectively, and the percentage with levels > 50 ng/mL was 2.9% and 2.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot trial, we found that recruitment of DOAC-treated patients who needed an elective high-bleed-risk surgery or neuraxial procedure was feasible and that preoperative residual DOAC levels appeared similar according to ASRA-based and PAUSE-based management approaches, providing the foundation for a larger trial comparing ASRA- and PAUSE-based perioperative DOAC management.

Cardiovascular diseases, prevention, and management of complications in older adults and frail patients treated for elective or post-traumatic hip orthopaedic interventions: a clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice (CCP), the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions of the ESC (ACNAP), the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases (WG APVD), and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis (WG T)

Due to the aging population, focusing on healthy aging has become a global priority. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and frailty, characterized by increased vulnerability to adverse stress and health events, interact synergistically in advanced age. In older adults, hip fractures are a frequent dramatic "life-transition" event. Conditions such as arrhythmias, orthostatic hypotension, heart failure, peripheral artery disease and adverse drug reactions may facilitate falls and thus bone fractures in older adults. Cardiovascular complications or the worsening of previous CVDs may increase the degree of frailty and disability following this surgery. The close relationship between older age, CVDs, frailty and orthopaedic surgery leads to the need to focus on the various phases of interventions in a multidisciplinary approach. This document aims to provide practical support to prevent cardiovascular complications in older and frail patients undergoing hip procedures by suggesting specific assessments and interventions. In particular, in pre-operative care the focus should be on the assessment and management of concomitant CVD and frailty, while immediate peri- and post-operative care should highlight specific concerns for anesthesia, prevention and management of thrombotic complications, specific nursing needs, including the prevention of infections and delirium, and the establishment of an integrated rehabilitation program focusing on CVDs and the risk of new falls, with a positive role for care-givers. Furthermore, by optimizing the "hip surgery pathway" the objective is to help avoid the deterioration of health and loss of independence that often result from this surgery through the correct management of cardiovascular patients in this peculiar context.

Predictors and Impact of Cardiogenic Shock in Oldest-Old ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most frequent cause of in-hospital mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Data about CS in very elderly (age ≥ 85 years) STEMI patients are scarce. We sought to assess the prognostic factors and the short- and mid-term impact of CS in this population. Methods: Consecutive very elderly STEMI patients undergoing invasive treatment were included in a retrospective multicenter registry. Results: Among 608 patients, 72 (11.8%) fulfilled experienced CS. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.29-3.92, p < 0.01) and cardiac arrest at presentation (OR: 4.36, 95% CI: 2.32-8.21, p < 0.01) were the major independent predictors of CS. Age (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.11, p < 0.001), PAD (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01-1.66, p = 0.045), previous MI (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.32-3.55, p = 0.002), and cardiac arrest at presentation (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.29-1.96, p < 0.001) were the major independent predictors of death. CS was associated with a higher risk of mortality at 30 days (adjusted HR: 4.21, 95% CI: 2.19 to 7.78, p < 0.01) mostly driven by higher intraprocedural and in-hospital mortality. Among patients who survived the acute phase and hospitalization, CS at presentation was not associated with a higher mortality risk during the remaining follow-up period (log-rank p = 0.78). Conclusions: At short-term follow-up, very elderly STEMI patients presenting with CS had a higher risk of mortality when compared to non-CS patients. Interestingly, CS patients surviving the acute phase showed a similar survival rate to non-CS patients after discharge.

Evaluating the Safety of Stent-Assisted Endovascular Treatment for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Older Adults: Emphasizing the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the outcomes and safety in patients aged ≥75 years and those aged <75 years who underwent stent-assisted endovascular treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms, specifically focusing on perioperative antiplatelet therapy (APT).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study comprised patients who underwent stent-assisted coiling (SAC) or flow diverter stent (FDS) placement for unruptured cerebral aneurysms. The primary outcome was defined as the composite outcomes of perioperative thromboembolic events, bleeding events, or death.

RESULTS

Among 632 patients, 533 (84.3%) were aged <75 years and 99 (15.6%) were aged ≥75 years. No significant differences were observed in the dual APT duration. The primary outcome occurred in 14.3% of patients aged <75 years and in 14.1% of those aged ≥75 years, with no significant difference (p = 1.0). The composites of the primary outcome, including thromboembolic events, bleeding events, and death differed insignificantly. Similar findings were observed when the primary outcomes for SAC (12.7% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.95) and FDS (17.5% vs. 18.4%, p = 1.0) were analyzed. The 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative event-free survival rates for the primary outcome were 89.5, 87.2%, and 85.2%, respectively, in patients aged <75 years, and 90.9%, 88.7%, and 87.0%, respectively, in those aged ≥75 years. These trends were similar (log-rank test, p = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were observed in the rates of the primary outcomes between patients aged <75 years and those aged ≥75 years. Therefore, refraining from stent-assisted treatment for unruptured aneurysms based solely on age might be inappropriate.

Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: How to Tackle Them?

Elderly patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a growing demographic population. These patients typically present more comorbidities and experience poorer outcomes compared to younger patients. Furthermore, they are less frequently subjected to revascularization procedures and are less likely to receive evidence-based medications in both the short and long-term periods. Assessing frailty is crucial in elderly patients with ACS because it can influence management decisions, as well as risk stratification and prognosis. Indeed, treatment decisions should consider geriatric syndromes, frailty, polypharmacy, sarcopenia, nutritional deficits, prevalence of comorbidities, thrombotic risk, and, at the same time, an increased risk of bleeding. Rigorous clinical assessments, clear revascularization criteria, and tailored approaches to antithrombotic therapy are essential for guiding personalized treatment decisions in these individuals. Assessing frailty helps healthcare providers identify patients who may benefit from targeted interventions to improve their outcomes and quality of life. Elderly individuals who experience ACS remain significantly underrepresented and understudied in randomized controlled trials. For this reason, the occurrence of ACS in the elderly continues to be a particularly complex issue in clinical practice, and one that clinicians increasingly have to address, given the general ageing of populations. This review aims to address the complex aspects of elderly patients with ACS to help clinicians make therapeutic decisions when faced with such situations.

Antithrombotic Strategies According to Age: Insights from the AUGUSTUS Trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic strategies by age in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention in AUGUSTUS.

METHODS

Patients were stratified into 3 age groups: <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years. Outcomes of interest were major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, major bleeding, death or rehospitalization, and ischemic events. Treatment effects of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin vs. placebo were assessed across age groups using Cox models.

RESULTS

Of 4614 patients, 1267 (27.5%) were <65, 1802 (39.0%) were 65-74, and 1545 (33.5%) were ≥75 years. Apixaban was associated with lower rates of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding than VKA (<65: HR 0.69 [0.47-1.00]; 65-74: HR 0.57 [0.43-0.75]; ≥75: HR 0.81 [0.63-1.04]). Death or hospitalization occurred less often with apixaban, regardless of age. No differences were observed in rates of ischemic events between apixaban and VKA according to age. Aspirin was associated with higher rates of bleeding than placebo (<65: HR 1.67 [1.15-2.43]; 65-74: HR 2.32 [1.73-3.10]; ≥75: HR 1.69 [1.31-2.19]). Rates of death or rehospitalization and ischemic events were similar among patients receiving aspirin or placebo across age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban was associated with greater absolute reduction in bleeding than VKA in older age groups, reflecting their higher hemorrhagic risk. Aspirin increased bleeding in all age groups vs. placebo. Our findings support the use of apixaban plus a purinergic receptor P2Y12(P2Y12) inhibitor without aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent acute coronary syndrome/percutaneous coronary intervention, regardless of age.

Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review

Importance

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism.

Observations

For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure.

Conclusions and Relevance

When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Frailty and Cardiovascular Health

The incidence of frailty and cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases as the population ages. There is a bidirectional relationship between frailty and CVD, and both conditions share several risk factors and underlying biological mechanisms. Frailty has been established as an independent prognostic marker in patients with CVD. Moreover, its presence significantly influences both primary and secondary prevention strategies for adults with CVD while also posing a barrier to the inclusion of these patients in pivotal clinical trials and advanced cardiac interventions. This review discusses the current knowledge base on the relationship between frailty and CVD, how managing CVD risk factors can modify frailty, the influence of frailty on CVD management, and future directions for frailty detection and modification in patients with CVD.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The elderly represent an increasing proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Various data have shown that the benefits of percutaneous coronary revascularization are maintained in elderly patients presenting with ACS. Conversely, the management of antiplatelet therapy remains challenging and controversial, because older patients are usually at a high risk of both ischemia and bleeding. Moreover, the recommended ischemic and bleeding risk scores in patients with ACS were developed from studies with a low representation of older patients. New antiplatelet strategies have been developed, but their evidence in elderly patients is limited because they are usually underrepresented in randomized clinical trials due to their clinical complexity. The aim of this review is to summarize the different factors associated with increased ischemic and/or bleeding risk and the scientific evidence about the different antiplatelet strategies in elderly patients presenting with ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Thrombotic microenvironment responsive crosslinking cyclodextrin metal-organic framework nanocarriers for precise targeting and thrombolysis

Global public health is seriously threatened by thrombotic disorders because of their high rates of mortality and disability. Most thrombolytic agents, especially protein-based pharmaceuticals, have a short half-life in circulation, reducing their effectiveness in thrombolysis. The creation of an intelligent drug delivery system that delivers medication precisely and releases it under regulated conditions at nearby thrombus sites is essential for effective thrombolysis. In this article, we present a unique medication delivery system (MCRUA) that selectively targets platelets and releases drugs by stimulation from the thrombus' microenvironment. The thrombolytic enzyme urokinase-type plasminogen-activator (uPA) and the anti-inflammatory medication Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) are both loaded onto pH-sensitive CaCO3/cyclodextrin crosslinking metal-organic frameworks (MC) that make up the MCRUA system. c(RGD) is functionalized on the surface of MC, which is functionalized by RGD to an esterification reaction. Additionally, the thrombus site's acidic microenvironment causes MCRUA to disintegrate to release uPA for thrombolysis and aiding in vessel recanalization. Moreover, cyclodextrin-encapsulated ASA enables the treatment of the inflammatory environment within the thrombus, enhancing the antiplatelet aggregation effects and promoting cooperative thrombolysis therapy. When used for thrombotic disorders, our drug delivery system (MCRUA) promotes thrombolysis, suppresses rethrombosis, and enhances biosafety with fewer hemorrhagic side effects.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of complex percutaneous coronary intervention among octogenarians

BACKGROUND

The number of octogenarians referred to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is rising steadily. The prevalence and prognostic impact of complex PCI (CPCI) in this vulnerable population has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

Patients ≥80 years old who underwent PCI between 2012 and 2019 at Mount Sinai Hospital were included. Patients were categorized based on PCI complexity, defined as the presence of at least one of the following criteria: use of atherectomy, total stent length ≥60 mm, ≥3 stents implanted, bifurcation treated with at least 2 stents, PCI involving ≥3 vessels, ≥3 lesions, left main, saphenous vein graft or chronic total occlusion. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target-vessel revascularization (TVR), within 1 year after PCI. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding.

RESULTS

Among 2657 octogenarians, 1387 (52%) underwent CPCI and were more likely to be men and to have cardiovascular risk factors or comorbidities. CPCI as compared with no-CPCI was associated with a higher 1-year risk of MACE (16.6% vs. 11.1%, adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.06-1.77, p value 0.017), due to an excess of MI and TVR, and major bleeding (10% vs. 5.8%, adjusted HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.55, p value 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among octogenarians, CPCI was associated with a significantly higher 1-year risk of MACE, due to higher rates of MI and TVR but not of all-cause death, and of major bleeding. Strategies to reduce complications should be implemented in octogenarians undergoing CPCI.

How to Manage Beta-Blockade in Older Heart Failure Patients: A Scoping Review

Beta blockers (BBs) play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of life and extending the survival of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Initiating the therapy at low doses and gradually titrating the dose upwards is recommended to ensure therapeutic efficacy while mitigating potential adverse effects. Vigilant monitoring for signs of drug intolerance is necessary, with dose adjustments as required. The management of older HF patients requires a case-centered approach, taking into account individual comorbidities, functional status, and frailty. Older adults, however, are often underrepresented in randomized clinical trials, leading to some uncertainty in management strategies as patients with HF in clinical practice are older than those enrolled in trials. The present article performs a scoping review of the past 25 years of published literature on BBs in older HF patients, focusing on age, outcomes, and tolerability. Twelve studies (eight randomized-controlled and four observational) encompassing 26,426 patients were reviewed. The results indicate that BBs represent a viable treatment for older HFrEF patients, offering benefits in symptom management, cardiac function, and overall outcomes. Their role in HF with preserved EF, however, remains uncertain. Further research is warranted to refine treatment strategies and address specific aspects in older adults, including proper dosing, therapeutic adherence, and tolerability.

The Impact of Geriatric Conditions in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review

The growing geriatric population presenting with coronary artery disease poses a primary challenge for healthcare services. This is a highly heterogeneous population, often underrepresented in studies and clinical trials, with distinctive characteristics that render them particularly vulnerable to standard management/approaches. In this review, we aim to summarize the available evidence on the treatment of acute coronary syndrome in the elderly. Additionally, we contextualize frailty, comorbidity, sarcopenia, and cognitive impairment, common in these patients, within the realm of coronary artery disease, proposing strategies for each case that may assist in therapeutic approaches.

Management of cardiac emergencies in women: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the Heart Failure Association (HFA), and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Cardiac emergencies in women, such as acute coronary syndromes, acute heart failure, and cardiac arrest, are associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes and mortality. Although women historically have been significantly underrepresented in clinical studies of these diseases, the guideline-recommended treatment for these emergencies is generally the same for both sexes. Still, women are less likely to receive evidence-based treatment compared to men. Furthermore, specific diseases affecting predominantly or exclusively women, such as spontaneous coronary dissection, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and peripartum cardiomyopathy, require specialized attention in terms of both diagnosis and management. In this clinical consensus statement, we summarize current knowledge on therapeutic management of these emergencies in women. Key statements and specific quality indicators are suggested to achieve equal and specific care for both sexes. Finally, we discuss several gaps in evidence and encourage further studies designed and powered with adequate attention for sex-specific analysis.

1- Versus 3-Month DAPT in Older Patients at a High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI: Insights from the XIENCE Short DAPT Global Program

This analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of 1- versus 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in older patients. Data from 3 prospective, single-arm studies (XIENCE Short DAPT Program), including patients with high bleeding risk successfully treated with an everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE, Abbott) were analyzed. DAPT was discontinued at 1 or at 3 months in patients free from ischemic events and adherent to DAPT. Patients were stratified according to age (≥75 and <75 years). The primary end point was all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI). The key secondary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 to 5 bleeding. The outcomes were assessed from 1 to 12 months after index PCI. Of 3,364 patients, 2,241 (66.6%) were aged ≥75 years. The risk of death or MI was similar with 1- versus 3-month DAPT in patients aged ≥75 (8.5% vs 8.0%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 1.30) and <75 years (6.9% vs 7.8%, adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.57, interaction p = 0.478). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 to 5 bleeding was consistently lower with 1- than with 3-month DAPT in patients aged ≥75 years (7.2% vs 9.4%, adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.91) and <75 years (9.7% vs 11.9%, adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.29, interaction p = 0.737). In conclusion, in patients at high bleeding risk who underwent PCI, patients older and younger than 75 years derived a consistent benefit from 1- compared with 3-month DAPT in terms of bleeding reduction, with no increase in all-cause death or MI at 1 year.

Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists, mostly warfarin, for the main indications for oral anticoagulation, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and prevention of embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. While DOACs offer practical, fixed-dose anticoagulation in many patients, specific restrictions or contraindications may apply. DOACs are not sufficiently effective in high-thrombotic risk conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome and mechanical heart valves. Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis may benefit from DOACs, but the bleeding risk, particularly in those with gastrointestinal or urogenital tumors, must be carefully weighed. In patients with frailty, excess body weight, and/or moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, DOACs must be cautiously administered and may require laboratory monitoring. Reversal agents have been developed and approved for life-threatening bleeding. In addition, the clinical testing of potentially safer anticoagulants such as factor XI(a) inhibitors is important to further optimize anticoagulant therapy in an increasingly elderly and frail population worldwide.

Antiplatelet Effect of Low-Dose Prasugrel in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

BACKGROUND

Low-dose prasugrel (5 mg) has been proposed for patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and advanced age or low body weight. However, the routine use of dose-adjusted prasugrel in this high-risk subset of patients is still debated.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of HRPR among elderly patients treated with low-dose (5 mg) prasugrel to evaluate the routine use of dose-adjusted prasugrel in this high-risk subset of patients.

METHODS

We included 59 elderly patients (≥75 years) treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100-160 mg + prasugrel 5 mg) after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) and undergoing platelet function assessment (by whole blood impedance aggregometry) 30-90 days post-discharge.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 43 days (interquartile range-IQR: 32-54), high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) occurred in 25 patients (42.4%), who displayed a greater body mass index (BMI) (p=0.02), lower levels of vitamin D (p=0.05) and were more frequently treated with nitrates (p=0.03). After multivariate analysis, BMI was the only independent predictor of prasugrel HRPR, and a BMI >26 was the best cut-off for predicting HRPR (adjusted Odds Ratio - OR=8.6, 95%CI: 2.2-33.9, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Among elderly patients receiving DAPT after PCI, HRPR is common with low-dose prasugrel. A greater BMI, especially for values ≥26, is the only independent predictor of HRPR with prasugrel 5 mg.

De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis

Conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention comprises aspirin with a potent P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12) inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) for 12 months. Although this approach reduces ischaemic risk, patients are exposed to a substantial risk of bleeding. Strategies to reduce bleeding include de-escalation of DAPT intensity (downgrading from potent P2Y12 inhibitor at conventional doses to either clopidogrel or reduced-dose prasugrel) or abbreviation of DAPT duration. Either strategy requires assessment of the ischaemic and bleeding risks of each individual. De-escalation of DAPT intensity can reduce bleeding without increasing ischaemic events and can be guided by platelet function testing or genotyping. Abbreviation of DAPT duration after 1-6 months, followed by monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor, reduces bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients at high bleeding risk, particularly those without high ischaemic risk. However, these two strategies have not yet been compared in a head-to-head clinical trial. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the evidence base for these treatment approaches, provide guidance on the assessment of ischaemic and bleeding risks, and provide consensus statements from an international panel of experts to help clinicians to optimize these DAPT approaches for individual patients to improve outcomes.

Individualization of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Stenting: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization.

Future Perspectives to Improve CHA2DS2VASc Score: The Role of Left Atrium Remodelling, Inflammation and Genetics in Anticoagulation of Atrial Fibrillation

In 10% of ischemic strokes, non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is detected retroactively. Milder, or even asymptomatic forms of NVAF have shown high mortality, thrombotic risk, and deterioration of cognitive function. The current guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AF contain "grey areas", such as the one related to anticoagulant treatment in men with CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 and women with score 2. Moreover, parameters such as renal function, patient weight or left atrium remodelling are missing from the recommended guidelines scores. Vulnerable categories of patients including the elderly population, high hemorrhagic risk patients or patients with newly diagnosed paroxysmal episodes of atrial high rate at device interrogation are at risk of underestimation of the thrombotic risk. This review presents a systematic exposure of the most important gaps in evaluation of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with NVAF. The authors propose new algorithms and risk factors that should be taken into consideration for an accurate thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk estimation, especially in vulnerable categories of patients.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in older adults with atrial fibrillation: a prospective single-centre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are underused in the elderly, regardless the evidence in their favour in this population.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled anticoagulant-naïve patients aged ≥ 75 years who started treatment with DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) and stratified them in older adults (aged 75-84 years) and extremely older adults (≥ 85 years). Thrombotic and hemorrhagic events were evaluated for 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

We enrolled 518 consecutive patients. They were mostly aged 75-84 years (299 patients; 57.7%) vs. ≥ 85 years (219 patients; 42.3%). Extremely older adults showed higher incidence of all the endpoints (systemic cardioembolism [HR 3.25 (95% CI 1.71-6.18)], major bleeding [HR 2.75 (95% CI 1.77-4.27)], and clinically relevant non-major bleeding [HR 2.13 (95% CI 1.17-3.92)]) vs. older adults during the first year after starting anticoagulation. In patients aged ≥ 85 years, no difference in the aforementioned endpoints was found between those receiving on-label vs. off-label DOACs. In the extremely older adults, chronic kidney disease, polypharmacy, use of antipsychotics, and DOAC discontinuation correlated with higher rates of thrombotic events, whereas a history of bleeding, Charlson Index ≥ 6, use of reduced DOAC dose, absence of a caregiver, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 were associated with major bleedings.

CONCLUSIONS

Naïve patients aged ≥ 85 who started a DOAC for AF are at higher risk of thrombotic and bleeding events compared to those aged 75-84 years in the first year of therapy. History of bleeding, HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 and use of NSAIDs are associated with higher rates of major bleeding.

Frailty, Treatments, and Outcomes in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Registry-Based Study

Background Guidelines recommend that patients with myocardial infarction (MI) receive equal care regardless of age. However, withholding treatment may be justified in elderly and frail patients. This study aimed to investigate trends in treatments and outcomes of older patients with MI according to frailty. Methods and Results All patients aged ≥75 years with first-time MI during 2002 to 2021 were identified through Danish nationwide registries. Frailty was categorized using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. One-year risk and hazard ratios (HRs) for days 0 to 28 and 29 to 365 were calculated for all-cause death. A total of 51 022 patients with MI were included (median, 82 years; 50.2% women). Intermediate/high frailty increased from 26.7% in 2002 to 2006 to 37.1% in 2017 to 2021. Use of treatment increased substantially regardless of frailty: for example, 28.1% to 48.0% (statins), 21.8% to 33.7% (dual antiplatelet therapy), and 7.6% to 28.0% (percutaneous coronary intervention) for high frailty (all P-trend <0.001). One-year death decreased for low frailty (35.1%-17.9%), intermediate frailty (49.8%-31.0%), and high frailty (62.8%-45.6%), all P-trend <0.001. Age- and sex-adjusted 29- to 365-day HRs (2017-2021 versus 2002-2006) were 0.53 (0.48-0.59), 0.62 (0.55-0.70), and 0.62 (0.46-0.83) for low, intermediate, and high frailty, respectively (P-interaction=0.23). When additionally adjusted for treatment, HRs attenuated to 0.74 (0.67-0.83), 0.83 (0.74-0.94), and 0.78 (0.58-1.05), respectively, indicating that increased use of treatment may account partially for the observed improvements. Conclusions Use of guideline-based treatments and outcomes improved concomitantly in older patients with MI, irrespective of frailty. These results indicate that guideline-based management of MI may be reasonable in the elderly and frail.

Current concepts in coronary artery revascularisation

Coronary artery revascularisation can be performed surgically or percutaneously. Surgery is associated with higher procedural risk and longer recovery than percutaneous interventions, but with long-term reduction of recurrent cardiac events. For many patients with obstructive coronary artery disease in need of revascularisation, surgical or percutaneous intervention is indicated on the basis of clinical and anatomical reasons or personal preferences. Medical therapy is a crucial accompaniment to coronary revascularisation, and data suggest that, in some subsets of patients, medical therapy alone might achieve similar results to coronary revascularisation. Most revascularisation data are based on prevalently White, non-elderly, male populations in high-income countries; robust data in women, older adults, and racial and other minorities, and from low-income and middle-income countries, are urgently needed.