2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Myocardial tissue microstructure with and without stress-induced ischemia assessed by T1 mapping in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Stress-induced myocardial ischemia seems not to be associated with cardiovascular events. However, its effects on myocardial tissue characteristics remain under debate. Thus, we sought to assess whether documented stress-induced ischemia is associated with changes in myocardial microstructure evaluated by magnetic resonance native T1 map and extracellular volume fraction (ECV).

METHODS

This is a single-center, analysis of the previously published MASS V Trial. Multivessel patients with a formal indication for myocardial revascularization and with documented stress-induced ischemia were included in this study. Native T1 and ECV values evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of ischemic and nonischemic myocardial segments at rest and after stress were compared. Myocardial ischemia was detected by either nuclear scintigraphy or stress magnetic cardiac resonance protocol.

RESULTS

Between May 2012 and March 2014, 326 prospective patients were eligible for isolated CABG or PCI and 219 were included in the MASS V trial. All patients underwent resting cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Of a total of 840 myocardial segments, 654 were nonischemic segments and 186 were ischemic segments. Native T1 and ECV values of ischemic segments were not significantly different from nonischemic segments, both at rest and after stress induction. In addition, native T1 and ECV values of myocardial segments supplied by vessels with obstructive lesions were similar to those supplied by nonobstructive ones.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In this study, cardiac magnetic resonance identified similar T1 mapping values between ischemic and nonischemic myocardial segments. This finding suggests integrity and stability of myocardial tissue in the presence of stress-induced ischemia.

Operational characteristics of generalized pairwise comparisons for hierarchically ordered endpoints

The method of generalized pairwise comparisons (GPC) is a multivariate extension of the well-known non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. It allows comparing two groups of observations based on multiple hierarchically ordered endpoints, regardless of the number or type of the latter. The summary measure, "net benefit," quantifies the difference between the probabilities that a random observation from one group is doing better than an observation from the opposite group. The method takes into account the correlations between the endpoints. We have performed a simulation study for the case of two hierarchical endpoints to evaluate the impact of their correlation on the type-I error probability and power of the test based on GPC. The simulations show that the power of the GPC test for the primary endpoint is modified if the secondary endpoint is included in the hierarchical GPC analysis. The change in power depends on the correlation between the endpoints. Interestingly, a decrease in power can occur, regardless of whether there is any marginal treatment effect on the secondary endpoint. It appears that the overall power of the hierarchical GPC procedure depends, in a complex manner, on the entire variance-covariance structure of the set of outcomes. Any additional factors (such as thresholds of clinical relevance, drop out, or censoring scheme) will also affect the power and will have to be taken into account when designing a trial based on the hierarchical GPC procedure.

Association Between Stress Testing-Induced Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Events in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

IMPORTANCE

The long-term prognostic implications of myocardial ischemia documented during stress testing in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether documented stress testing-induced myocardial ischemia is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events or ventricular function changes in patients with stable multivessel CAD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective cohort study was conducted using data from a single-center randomized clinical trial (Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study [MASS] II) to examine the association of myocardial ischemia documented during stress testing at baseline with cardiovascular events and ventricular function changes during follow-up. Participants were previously randomized (May 1, 1995, to May 31, 2000) to medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stents, or coronary artery bypass grafting. Event-free survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression models were calculated to assess the association between ischemia and the primary composite end point. The vital status was determined on February 28, 2011. Data were analyzed from February 1, 2016, to April 1, 2017.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cardiovascular events (overall mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization for refractory angina) were tracked from the time of randomization to the end of the 10-year follow-up (mean [SD] duration, 11.4 [4.3] years). Myocardial ischemia was assessed at baseline and at 1-year intervals by exercise stress testing, and ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction) was assessed by echocardiography at baseline and after 10 years. Patients with documented ischemia were compared with those without ischemia regarding the outcomes and changes in ventricular function.

RESULTS

Of 611 participants, 535 underwent exercise stress testing at baseline: 270 with documented ischemia and 265 without. Of these 535 patients, 373 (69.7%) were men, and the mean (SD) age for the entire cohort was 59.7 (9.2) years. No association was found between the presence of ischemia at baseline and survival free of combined cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80-1.27; P = .95) after multivariable adjustment that included CAD initial randomized treatments. In addition, among 320 patients who underwent echocardiographic evaluation, the slight decline in left ventricular ejection fraction after 10 years was similar in both groups (median [SD] difference, -4.9% [18.7%] vs -6.6% [20.0%], respectively, for groups with and without ischemia; P = .97).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, regardless of the therapeutic strategy applied, the presence of documented myocardial ischemia did not appear to be associated with an increased occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events or changes in ventricular function in patients with multivessel CAD during a long-term follow-up.

Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians: Safety, tolerability, and long-term prognostic implications of hemodynamic response and SPECT-related variables

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of tolerability, safety, and prognostic implications of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in octogenarians.

METHODS

370 octogenarians (49% known coronary artery disease) were studied. Hemodynamic response, MPI-related data, and rest-left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) based on echocardiography were registered per patient, and prospective follow-up was performed to document all-cause death (ACD), cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), and late revascularization.

RESULTS

No deaths or MIs were observed during adenosine infusion or the short-term post-infusion period. 86% of patients were able to tolerate a 6-minute infusion. All side effects terminated spontaneously after infusion cessation, except for one case of pulmonary oedema. After 9.3 years, there were 124 ACDs, 62 CDs, 16 MIs, and 35 revascularizations. Differences between survival curves of summed stress score (SSS)-based risk groups were significant for all end points (P < .001). SSS and LVEF were independent predictors of all end points (P ≤ .01) and lung uptake of cardiac end points. ΔHR <10 bpm (OR = 1.78, P = .004) and inability to increase HR by >10 bpm and decrease systolic blood pressure by >10 mmHg (OR = 2, P = .02) during adenosine infusion were independent predictors of ACD and CD, respectively. Hemodynamic response variables, SSS, and lung uptake provided incremental prognostic value over pre-test data for ACD and CD.

CONCLUSIONS

In octogenarians, adenosine stress MPI is well tolerated and provides effective long-term risk stratification.

Effect of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on secondary medical prevention and clinical outcome in stable coronary artery disease patients

BACKGROUND

Limited recent data are available in the literature on whether the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) affects the therapeutic management of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

AIMS

The objectives of this study were to analyse prevalence, effect on therapeutics and prognosis of LVSD in stable CAD.

METHODS

We prospectively included 4184 CAD outpatients free from any myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization for>1year. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was available for 4124 (98.6%) patients. Follow-up was performed at 2years. All events were adjudicated blindly.

RESULTS

The mean EF was 57.5±10.8%, and 201 (4.9%) patients had an EF≤35%. The prescription of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and beta-blockers was inversely related to EF, and reached>90% in patients with EF≤35%. Seventy-five (37.3%) of the patients with EF≤35% received a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Eighty-five (42.3%) of the patients with EF≤35% had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for 4090 patients (99.2%). Event rates were higher in patients with low EF (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] for EF≤35%, with EF≥60% as reference: 3.93 [2.60-5.93] and 7.12 [3.85-13.18], for all-cause death and cardiovascular death, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable CAD, LVSD is well taken into account by cardiologists, with extensive use of evidence-based medications and interventions. Despite this, LVSD remains a major prognostic indicator in this population.

Revascularization options in stable coronary artery disease: it is not how to revascularize, it is whether and when to revascularize

Patients with acute coronary syndromes and severe multivessel or left main coronary artery disease have better outcomes when prompt revascularization is performed in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT). However, in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, randomized strategy trials have revealed equipoise between initial strategies of OMT alone and OMT plus revascularization. Conducted in diverse stable ischemic heart disease patient populations and throughout the spectrum of atherosclerotic and ischemic burden, the RITA-2, MASS II, COURAGE, BARI 2D and FAME 2 trials demonstrate that OMT alone and OMT plus revascularization yield similar outcomes with respect to mortality and myocardial infarction. What remains unclear is whether there may be one or more subsets of patients with stable ischemic heart disease in whom revascularization may be associated with a reduction in mortality or myocardial infarction, which is to be addressed in the ongoing ISCHEMIA trial.