The bidirectional interaction between atrial fibrillation and heart failure: consequences for the management of both diseases

Health conditions in adults with atrial fibrillation compared with the general population: a population-based cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence is rising due to population ageing and comorbidity is an increasing problem. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and association of coexisting health conditions among adults with AF in the general population.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care electronic medical records in England linked to hospital admissions as of 30 November 2015. CPRD is broadly representative of the UK general population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity. We estimated prevalence and used logistic regression examining risk factors of age, sex and socioeconomic status (SES) to compare prevalence of 252 physical and mental health conditions and 23 higher level health condition groups in adults with AF compared with adults without AF.

RESULTS

34 338 adults with AF (57% male; 83% ≥65 years) and 907 739 without AF (49% male; 23% ≥65 years) were identified. Adjusted for age and sex, adults with AF were significantly more likely to have 20/23 (87%) health condition groups than adults without AF. The most prevalent health condition groups in adults with AF were cardiovascular (prevalence of 89% in adults with AF vs 26% in adults without AF, adjusted OR (aOR) 5.82, 95% CI 5.60 to 6.05), gastrointestinal (62% vs 37%, aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.38) and orthopaedic (58% vs 24%, aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.35). 151/252 individual conditions were significantly more common in adults with AF including cardiovascular conditions such as cardiomyopathy (4.5% vs 0.3%, aOR 9.58, 95% CI 8.88 to 10.35) and heart failure (18% vs 0.7%, aOR 9.07, 95% CI 8.70 to 9.46), and non-cardiovascular conditions such as pleural effusion (16% vs 1.8%, aOR 3.55, 95% CI 3.42 to 3.67) and oesophageal malignancy (0.3% vs 0.0%, aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.70). Associations were similar after SES adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

While cardiovascular conditions are highly prevalent and strongly associated with AF, a wide spectrum of non-cardiovascular conditions were also strongly associated, requiring a greater understanding of managing comorbid conditions with management principles contradictory to AF.

Up-titration of medication in patients with new-onset heart failure with and without atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Differences in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and clinical outcomes have been observed between heart failure (HF) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) versus those in sinus rhythm. This study evaluated the effects of up-titration of HF therapies, consisting of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), in patients with new-onset HF with and without AF.

METHODS

Among 607 patients with new-onset HF (<3 months) from a specialized nurse-led HF clinic in the Netherlands, 187 (31%) patients had AF, and 420 (69%) patients were in sinus rhythm at baseline electrocardiogram. After an up-titration period of 9 months, achieved doses and reasons for not reaching target doses were documented.

RESULTS

Patients with AF were older, less likely to have ischaemic heart disease and had higher baseline N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels (all P < 0.05). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline was similar between patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm (37% vs. 36%, P = 0.453). Prescription of GDMT was comparable between patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm, except for a lower ACEi/ARB prescription and higher use of diuretics in patients with AF (79% vs. 86%; P = 0.038; 86% vs. 59%, P < 0.001, respectively, compared with sinus rhythm). Up-titration to guideline-recommended target doses of beta-blocker, ACEi/ARB and MRA therapy was similar between patients with and without AF (31% vs. 24%, P = 0.096; 32% vs. 40%, P = 0.098; 23.7% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.125, respectively). Reasons for not further up-titrating to recommended target doses were consistent across patients with AF and sinus rhythm. LVEF improvement of ≥5% and ≥10% after up-titration was more common in patients with AF than those in sinus rhythm (67% vs. 53%, P = 0.017; 48% vs. 36%, P = 0.043). Achieving target doses of ACEi/ARB and MRA therapies was associated with lower mortality and HF rehospitalization rates at 3 years in both patients with AF and those in sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with new-onset HF, up-titration to recommended doses of GDMT was similar in patients with and without AF, but was associated with a greater improvement in LVEF in patients with AF.

Chronic kidney disease and increased LAVI as risk factors of new-onset heart failure in atrial fibrillation: A case-control study

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases heart failure (HF) risk and can eventually increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, recognizing risk factors in AF patients is crucial to prevent heart failure. To date, there has been no research on this topic in Indonesia.

Objective

To determine risk factors of new-onset HF in AF patients.

Methods

Case-control study was undertaken at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital using medical record data from January 2018 to May 2023. AF patients aged ≥18 years with new-onset HF were included in the case group, and AF patients of similar age without HF were included in the control group. Patients with moderate or severe valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, pacemakers, or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), or incomplete data were excluded. Logistic regression was used to identify significant risk factors for new-onset HF in AF patients.

Results

A total of 132 subjects consisting of 44 cases and 88 controls were included. Bivariate analysis revealed that the significant risk factors for new-onset HF in AF patients were CAD [p = .037; OR 2.34 (95% CI 1.11-4.93)], CKD [p = .000; OR 7.78 (95% CI 3.45-17.53)], and LAVI [p = .002; OR 3.23 (95% CI 1.52-6.85)]. In multivariate analysis, CKD [p = .000; OR 6.31 (95% CI 2.69-14.77)] and LAVI [p = .000; OR 3.49 (95% CI 1.42-9.97)] retained their statistical significance as risk factors of new-onset HF in AF patients.

Conclusions

CKD and increased LAVI may increase the likelihood of new-onset HF in AF patients, while hypertension, diabetes, CAD, smoking, and obesity were not significant risk factors for new-onset HF in our study.

Predictive value of left and right atrial strain for the detection of device-detected atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke and implantable cardiac monitor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF) is frequently identified using implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) following cryptogenic stroke (CS). While left atrium (LA) echocardiographic parameters have been linked to DDAF risk, right atrial (RA) parameters remain underexplored. This study aimed to assess the relationship between speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters and the occurrence of DDAF detected via ICM in patients with CS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive CS patients who received an ICM at our institution. All underwent transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate LA, RA, left and right ventricle (LV, RV) function using standard and strain-derived parameters. The primary endpoint was the first DDAF episode lasting >6 min recorded by ICM.

RESULTS

Between May 2013 and July 2022, 204 patients (82 % males, median age 69 years) received an ICM. Over a median follow-up of 15.3 months [interquartile range: 7.4-23.5], DDAF was detected in 96 patients (47.0 %). LA peak longitudinal strain (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95 %CI 0.84-0.89, p < 0.001), peak conduit strain (adjusted-HR 1.17, 95 %CI 1.13-1.22, p < 0.001), and peak contraction strain (adjusted-HR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.11-1.22, p < 0.001) significantly predicted DDAF. RA peak longitudinal strain (adjusted-HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.83-0.95, p < 0.001) and peak contraction strain (adjusted-HR 1.39, 95 % CI 1.26-1.53, p < 0.001) were also predictive, but peak conduit strain was not (p = 0.103). No significant associations were found for LV or RV parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

LA and RA strain analyses are valuable for predicting DDAF detection following CS and can aid in risk stratification before ICM insertion.

Detection of heart failure in a general population not aware of having the disease

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common causes of hospitalization and death worldwide. We aimed at identifying variables that can be helpful for early diagnosis of HF in primary care.

METHODS

In 2015-16, we included 2007 participants aged ≥ 40 years in the 7th Tromsø study. They underwent echocardiography and other examinations needed for establishing a diagnosis of HF according to European guidelines from 2016. We analyzed associations with HF among the 1863 participants who reported not to have HF. Variables significantly associated with HF were included in multivariable logistic regression analyses. Diagnostic models were further analyzed by ROC curves and areas under curve (AUC) were calculated, optimism corrected by bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The HF prevalence in the age groups 40-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥ 75 years were 3.5%, 11.7% and 29.4%, respectively. A predictive model based on self-reported hypertension, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, body-mass index and moderate to severe dyspnea had an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI 0.785-0.843). In a significantly stronger model, in which NT-proBNP was included and self-reported atrial fibrillation was replaced by atrial fibrillation on ECG, an AUC of 0.849 (95% CI 0.821-0.880) was reached.

CONCLUSION

Easily available clinical information may be used both to rule out HF an to identify patients needing further examinations. A direct referral to echocardiography should be considered for elderly patients in primary care with a known cardiovascular disease and severe shortness of breath. With less abundant history and symptoms, ECG and NT-proBNP can guide further investigations.

Different Approaches to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure Patients: Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has been proven beneficial in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). On top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), additional ablation strategies such as empirical lines/posterior box/low voltage ablation (PVI+L/LVA) are often used. Whether PVI+L/LVA provides additional benefits in this population has never been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze the temporal trends and comparative outcomes of PVI+L/LVA vs PVI alone.

METHODS

Patients with HFrEF undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation were retrospectively enrolled. The 2 coprimary endpoints were ventricular function recovery and atrial fibrillation recurrence-free survival at 1 year. The performance of PVI and PVI+L/LVA was compared in the overall population and in 2 matched groups. A sensitivity analysis for measured confounders was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 955 HFrEF patients (age 62.1 years, 24.4% female) from 9 international centers were included (PVI only 51.6% vs PVI+L/LVA 48.4%). At 12 months after the procedure, 62.3% of the patients remained free from arrhythmia recurrences and 65.4% experienced ventricular function recovery. Comparing PVI to PVI+L/LVA, no significant difference in the 2 coprimary endpoints was observed, neither in the overall nor in the matched cohorts. The use of PVI+L/LVA increased from 27% in 2013 to 68% in 2022. Patients undergoing PVI+L/LVA experienced more complications (3.8 vs 1.2%; P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation is associated with significant improvements in systolic function, irrespective of the ablation strategy used. The use of PVI+L/LVA in HFrEF patients is progressively expanding over time. Although the benefits of this practice remain unproven, it is associated with an increased risk of overall and nonvascular complications. These results warrant caution regarding the growing use of PVI+ in HFrEF patients.

Heart failure in patients with a systemic right ventricle: A multicentre study with long-term follow-up

AIMS

Adult patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and an systemic right ventricle (sRV) are at risk for heart failure (HF). In this study, we investigated risk factors for HF hospitalization and developed a novel risk stratification tool to optimize risk prediction for clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this international multicentre study, 522 patients with TGA and an sRV, without history of HF hospitalization, were followed retrospectively for a median of 17.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12.9-22.1). HF hospitalization was defined as a hospital admission for HF signs and symptoms with initiation or increase of HF medication. Predictors for HF hospitalization were established using a Cox regression analysis and were used to build a 10-year risk score. Of the 522 patients, 70% had an atrial switch operation and 30% had a congenitally corrected TGA. The median age at time of enrolment was 23.7 years (IQR 19.9-32.1) and 64% were male. During follow-up, 127 patients (24.3%) had at least one HF hospitalization. A risk stratification tool was built using the following independent predictors associated with a 10-year risk of HF hospitalization: age, New York Heart Association functional class ≥II, QRS duration >120 ms, atrial fibrillation, moderate/severe right ventricular dysfunction, with a C-statistic of 0.868 (95% confidence interval 0.823-0.913).

CONCLUSION

During follow-up, 24.3% of sRV patients had at least one HF hospitalization. Five simple, clinically-accessible variables can be used as a risk score tool to identify patients at higher risk of HF hospitalization.

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure Who Develop Atrial Fibrillation or Convert to Sinus Rhythm

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in acute heart failure (AHF), with a prevalence of approximately 35%. However, little is known about the clinical characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital conversion from AF to sinus rhythm and vice versa.

METHODS

In a post hoc secondary analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROTECT trial in patients with AHF, we identified 4 groups of patients: AF at admission and in-hospital conversion to sinus rhythm (n = 44); in-hospital development of AF (n = 31); persistent AF (n = 278); and continuous sinus rhythm (n = 410).

RESULTS

Conversion from AF to sinus rhythm (13.7%) and from sinus rhythm to AF (7.0%) occurred only in a minority of patients. Patients with AF who converted to sinus rhythm were more often classified as being in New York Heart Association class IV, had higher heart rates and higher respiratory rates at hospital admission, whereas patients who developed AF were older, more likely to be female and had the highest ejection fractions compared to continuous sinus rhythm (all P < 0.05). Conversion to sinus rhythm or development of AF occurred mainly within the first 24 hours after hospital admission. Patients with persistent AF and those who developed AF had longer median lengths of hospital stay (8 vs 7 days; P < 0.001 and 9 vs 7 days; P < 0.001, respectively), compared to those with continuous sinus rhythm. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between the AF groups and the primary clinical outcomes of either 180-day all-cause mortality or 60-day death or readmission for heart failure.

CONCLUSION

In patients hospitalized for AHF, only few converted from AF to sinus rhythm or sinus rhythm to AF. Although development of AF or persistent AF was associated with longer lengths of hospitalization, midterm mortality and readmission rates were similar in the groups.

Heart Failure Masked as Pulmonary Embolism in Non-adherent Patient With Atrial Fibrillation: Case Report and Analytical Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND/AIM

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) commonly co-occur, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality. Poorly controlled AF can contribute to complications like HF and is associated with conditions, such as stroke and pulmonary embolism (PE). This report involves a man with AF who had persistent respiratory symptoms and left-sided chest pain, initially suspected to be PE, but eventually diagnosed as HF.

CASE REPORT

A 43-year-old male experienced increasing breathlessness, cough, and fatigue. Initially suspected to have a respiratory infection, his persistent symptoms raised concern for PE. The patient had a history of AF, unsuccessful cardioversion, and long-term non-adherence to beta blockers. Initial assessment revealed persistent respiratory symptoms and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, D-dimer, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and Troponin T. Chest X-ray showed pulmonary congestion, and echocardiogram confirmed a severely impaired ejection fraction (EF <20%). While the differential diagnosis included community-acquired pneumonia, PE, and HF, the final diagnosis was worsening AF and HF with reduced EF, not PE.

CONCLUSION

PE symptoms can overlap with HF, making careful differential diagnosis essential, particularly in AF patients with elevated D-dimer levels, where false positives necessitate caution. This case underscores the importance of thorough differential diagnosis and clinical judgment before ordering tests to avoid misdiagnosis. Long-term non-adherence to beta blockers exacerbated the patient's symptoms, emphasising the critical role of consistent medication use in managing AF and preventing complications like HF. This case report also highlights the importance of thorough investigations, guideline-based treatments and multidisciplinary care in complex AF-HF cases.

Echocardiographic assessment of atrial, ventricular, and valvular function in patients with atrial fibrillation-an expert proposal by the german working group of cardiovascular ultrasound

Echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation is challenging due to the varying heart rate. Thus, the topic of this expert proposal focuses on an obvious gap in the current recommendations about diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF)-the peculiarities and difficulties of echocardiographic imaging. The assessment of systolic and diastolic function-especially in combination with valvular heart diseases-by echocardiography can basically be done by averaging the results of echocardiographic measurements of the respective parameters or by the index beat approach, which uses a representative cardiac cycle for measurement. Therefore, a distinction must be made between the functionally relevant status, which is characterized by the averaging method, and the best possible hemodynamic status, which is achieved with the most optimal left ventricular (LV) filling according to the index beat method with longer previous RR intervals. This proposal focuses on left atrial and left ventricular function and deliberately excludes problems of echocardiography when assessing left atrial appendage in terms of its complexity. Echocardiography of the left atrial appendage is therefore reserved for its own expert proposal.

Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Novel Insights, Challenges, and Treatment Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure frequently co-exist. This review discusses the comorbidity of atrial fibrillation and heart failure, the bi-directional link between them, and the recent advances in the management of these co-existing diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Catheter ablation received a class 1 A recommendation for patients with AF and HF, after overwhelming evidence in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and end-stage heart failure, while clinical trials are still lacking in patients with preserved ejection. Guideline-medical therapy of heart failure decreases the incidence of atrial fibrillation and the progression of atrial myopathy. Based on the current evidence, management of patients with both HF and AF should be include early optimization of comorbidity control, guideline-medical therapy for heart failure, and rhythm control preferentially through catheter ablation in properly selected patients.

Interpretable machine learning model for new-onset atrial fibrillation prediction in critically ill patients: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care and is associated with poor prognosis and disease burden. Identifying high-risk individuals early is crucial. This study aims to create and validate a NOAF prediction model for critically ill patients using machine learning (ML).

METHODS

The data came from two non-overlapping datasets from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC), with MIMIC-IV used for training and subset of MIMIC-III used as external validation. LASSO regression was used for feature selection. Eight ML algorithms were employed to construct the prediction model. Model performance was evaluated based on identification, calibration, and clinical application. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used for visualizing model characteristics and individual case predictions.

RESULTS

Among 16,528 MIMIC-IV patients, 1520 (9.2%) developed AF post-ICU admission. A model with 23 variables was built, with XGBoost performing best, achieving an AUC of 0.891 (0.873-0.888) in validation and 0.769 (0.756-0.782) in external validation. Key predictors included age, mechanical ventilation, urine output, sepsis, blood urea nitrogen, percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation, continuous renal replacement therapy and weight. A risk probability greater than 0.6 was defined as high risk. A friendly user interface had been developed for clinician use.

CONCLUSION

We developed a ML model to predict the risk of NOAF in critically ill patients without cardiac surgery and validated its potential as a clinically reliable tool. SHAP improves the interpretability of the model, enables clinicians to better understand the causes of NOAF, helps clinicians to prevent it in advance and improves patient outcomes.

Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) treated with catheter ablation (CA) vs antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared morbidity and mortality of patients with AF and HFpEF treated with CA vs AAT.

METHODS

AF and HFpEF patients from January 2017 to June 2023 were identified in TriNetX, a large global population-based database. Patients with prior diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or crossover between AAT and CA were excluded. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, type of AF, comorbidities, and cardiovascular medications were compared. The 2 groups were 1:1 propensity score matched for outcomes analysis. All-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack, and acute heart failure were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Patients treated with CA (n = 1959) and AAT (n = 7689) were 1:1 propensity score matched, yielding 3632 patients with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Compared with AAT, CA was associated with decreased mortality (9.2% vs 20.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.431; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.359-0.518; P < .001). In addition, CA was associated with reduced HFpEF (HR, 0.638; 95% CI, 0.550-0.741; P < .001) and acute HFrEF (HR, 0.645; 95% CI, 0.452-0.920; P = .015). There was no difference in composite of cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (HR, 0.935; 95% CI, 0.725-1.207; P = .607).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study of patients with AF and HFpEF, CA was associated with lower mortality and risk of acute heart failure compared with AAT.

Prevalence and outcomes of heart failure phenotypes in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with heart failure (HF). Real-world data about long-term outcomes and rhythm control interventions use in AF patients with and without HF remain scarce.

METHODS

AF patients from two prospective, multicentre studies were classified based on the HF status at baseline into: HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF), and no HF. The prespecified primary outcome was risk of HF hospitalisation. Other outcomes of interest included mortality, cardiovascular events, AF progression, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 1265 patients with AF were analysed (mean age 69.6 years, women 27.4%) with a median follow-up of 5.98 years. Patients with HFpEF (n = 126) had a 2.69-fold and patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 308) had a 2.12-fold increased risk of HF hospitalisation compared to patients without HF (n = 831, p < 0.001). Similar results applied for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The risk for AF progression was higher for patients with HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF (6.30 and 6.79 per 100 patient-years, respectively) compared to patients without HF (4.20). The use of rhythm control strategies during follow-up was least in the HFpEF population (4.56 per 100 patient-years) compared to 7.74 in HFrEF/HFmrEF and 8.03 in patients with no HF. With regards to quality of life over time, this was worst among HFpEF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of HFpEF among patients with AF carried a high risk of HF hospitalisations and AF progression, and worse quality of life. Rhythm control interventions were rarely offered to HFpEF patients. These results uncover an unmet need for enhanced therapeutic interventions in patients with AF and HFpEF.

Incidence and prediction of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation: the REFLEJA scale

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with increased mortality. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of HHF, identify the clinical predictors of its occurrence, and develop a new risk scale.

METHODS

The incidence of HHF was estimated using data from the prospective single-center REFLEJA registry of outpatients with AF (October 2017-October 2018). A multivariate Cox regression model was calculated to detect HHF predictors, and a nomogram was created for individual risk assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 1499 patients included (mean age 73.8±11.1 years, 48.1% women), 127 had HHF (incidence rate of 8.51 per 100 persons/y) and 319 died (rate of death from any cause of 21.1 per 100 persons/y) after a 3-year follow-up. The independent predictors of HHF were age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, pulmonary hypertension, previous pacemaker implantation, baseline use of diuretics, and moderate-severe aortic regurgitation. The c-statistic for predicting the event was 0.762 (95%CI after boostrapping resampling, 0.753-0.791). The cumulative incidences of the main outcome for the risk scale quartiles were 1.613 (Q1), 3.815 (Q2), 8.378 (Q3), and 20.436 (Q4) cases per 100 persons/y (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HHF was common in this AF cohort. The combination of certain clinical characteristics can identify patients with a very high risk of HHF.

Small Left Ventricle in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Increased Cardiovascular Risk

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear whether small left ventricle (LV) is an adverse structural prognostic feature in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between small LV and risk of cardiovascular events in AF population.

METHODS

From the China-AF registry, 7,764 patients with AF were enrolled and divided into groups with normal, small, and large LV size based on left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) measurement per the American Society of Echocardiography references. Cox models were used to assess the association between LV size or LVEDD with composite cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, or major bleeding).

RESULTS

There were 308 (4.0%) participants assessed with small LV who were older, with lower body mass and blood pressure, and fewer comorbidities, and 429 (5.5%) were identified with large LV. Compared with the normal LV group, small LV and large LV were significantly associated with higher incidence of composite cardiovascular events (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.54 [95% CI: 1.07-2.20] for small LV; aHR: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.02-1.81] for large LV) and cardiovascular death (aHR: 1.94 [95% CI: 1.14-3.28] for small LV; aHR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.24-2.69] for large LV). Small LV was also associated with increased risk of major bleeding [aHR: 2.21 [95% CI: 1.01-4.86]). A U-shaped relationship between LVEDD and composite cardiovascular events was identified (Pnonlinear < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective AF cohort, small LV was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, which needed consideration in risk stratification and management for patients with AF. (ChiCTR-OCH-13003729).

The hospital frailty risk score effectively predicts adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in the intensive care unit

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are significant global public health problems associated with advancing age. However, the relationship between frailty and older patients with AF in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to investigate whether the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) is associated with adverse outcomes in older patients with AF in the ICU.

Methods

This was the first retrospective analysis of older patients with AF admitted to the ICU between 2008 and 2019 at a tertiary academic medical center in Boston. The HFRS was used to measure frailty severity. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital and 30-day mortality and the incidence of sepsis and ischemic stroke.

Results

There were 7,792 participants aged approximately 80 years, almost half (44.9%) of whom were female. Among this group, 2,876 individuals were identified as non-frail, while 4,916 were classified as frail. The analysis revealed a significantly greater incidence of in-hospital (18.8% compared to 7.6%) and 30-day mortality (24.5% versus 12.3%) in the frail group. After accounting for potential confounding factors, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that frail participants had a 1.56-fold greater risk of mortality within 30 days (95% CI = 1.38-1.76, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with AF admitted to the ICU. Therefore, prioritizing frailty assessment and implementing specific intervention strategies to improve prognostic outcomes are recommended.

A Genomic Link From Heart Failure to Atrial Fibrillation Risk: FOG2 Modulates a TBX5/GATA4-Dependent Atrial Gene Regulatory Network

BACKGROUND

The relationship between heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is clear, with up to half of patients with HF progressing to AF. The pathophysiological basis of AF in the context of HF is presumed to result from atrial remodeling. Upregulation of the transcription factor FOG2 (friend of GATA2; encoded by ZFPM2) is observed in human ventricles during HF and causes HF in mice.

METHODS

FOG2 expression was assessed in human atria. The effect of adult-specific FOG2 overexpression in the mouse heart was evaluated by whole animal electrophysiology, in vivo organ electrophysiology, cellular electrophysiology, calcium flux, mouse genetic interactions, gene expression, and genomic function, including a novel approach for defining functional transcription factor interactions based on overlapping effects on enhancer noncoding transcription.

RESULTS

FOG2 is significantly upregulated in the human atria during HF. Adult cardiomyocyte-specific FOG2 overexpression in mice caused primary spontaneous AF before the development of HF or atrial remodeling. FOG2 overexpression generated arrhythmia substrate and trigger in cardiomyocytes, including calcium cycling defects. We found that FOG2 repressed atrial gene expression promoted by TBX5. FOG2 bound a subset of GATA4 and TBX5 co-bound genomic locations, defining a shared atrial gene regulatory network. FOG2 repressed TBX5-dependent transcription from a subset of co-bound enhancers, including a conserved enhancer at the Atp2a2 locus. Atrial rhythm abnormalities in mice caused by Tbx5 haploinsufficiency were rescued by Zfpm2 haploinsufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcriptional changes in the atria observed in human HF directly antagonize the atrial rhythm gene regulatory network, providing a genomic link between HF and AF risk independent of atrial remodeling.

Device therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Device therapy is a nonpharmacological approach that presents a crucial advancement for managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review investigated the impact of device-based interventions and emphasized their potential for optimizing treatment for this complex patient demographic. Cardiac resynchronization therapy, augmented by atrioventricular node ablation with His-bundle pacing or left bundle-branch pacing, is effective for enhancing cardiac function and establishing atrioventricular synchrony. Cardiac contractility modulation and vagus nerve stimulation represent novel strategies for increasing myocardial contractility and adjusting the autonomic balance. Left ventricular expanders have demonstrated short-term benefits in HFpEF patients but require more investigation for long-term effectiveness and safety, especially in patients with AF. Research gaps regarding complications arising from left ventricular expander implantation need to be addressed. Device-based therapies for heart valve diseases, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, show promise for patients with AF and HFpEF, particularly those with mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. Clinical evaluations show that these device therapies lessen AF occurrence, improve exercise tolerance, and boost left ventricular diastolic function. However, additional studies are required to perfect patient selection criteria and ascertain the long-term effectiveness and safety of these interventions. Our review underscores the significant potential of device therapy for improving the outcomes and quality of life for patients with AF and HFpEF.

Relationship between Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Thromboembolic Events in Elderly Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Objective

To investigate the relationship between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and thromboembolic events in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study, and based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 180 elderly patients with NVAF were included. The patients received follow-up appointments in the clinic or by telephone every 6 months after the beginning of the study. The primary follow-up endpoints were thromboembolic and atherosclerotic events, including ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and systemic embolism. The secondary endpoints were adverse events, including cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and hospitalisation for heart failure. Patients were divided into three groups according to their BNP level at admission: group A (BNP ≤334.5 pg/mL), group B (BNP = 334.5-1,288 pg/mL), and group C (BNP ≥1,288 pg/mL).

Results

A total of 180 patients were enrolled in this study, with 50 patients in group A, 68 in group B, and 62 in group C. Compared with groups A and B, group C had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (Z = 15.142; P=0.001) and a lower ejection fraction (EF) value (Z = 119.893; P=0.001). The left atrium (LA) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) were larger (Z = 105.031; P=0.001 and Z = 74.430; P=0.001), respectively, suggesting that patients with significantly increased BNP had a higher risk of thromboembolism and atherosclerosis, lower EF, larger LA and LVEDD, and worse cardiac function. After 1 year of follow-up, the incidence of primary endpoint events (χ2 = 9.556; P=0.008) and secondary endpoint events (χ2 = 59.485; P=0.001) in group C were higher than those in groups A and B.

Conclusion

Higher BNP levels may be an independent risk factor for thromboembolic and atherosclerotic events in elderly patients with NVAF. The higher the BNP level, the greater the risk of thromboembolic and atherosclerotic events.

Evaluation of Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Therapeutic Characteristics, and Prognostic Outcomes of Coexisting Heart Failure among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib) Study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. Heart failure (HF) can occur concurrently with AF.

AIM

We compared different demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics between patients with AF+HF and patients with AF only. Furthermore, we explored whether concurrent HF independently predicts several outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE), major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB)).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comparisons between the AF+HF and the AF-only group were carried out. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were constructed for each outcome to assess whether HF was predictive of any of them while controlling for possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2020 patients were included in this study: 481 had AF+HF; 1539 had AF only. AF+HF patients were older, more commonly males, and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease (p≤0.05). Furthermore, AF+HF patients more commonly had pulmonary hypertension and low ejection fraction (p≤0.001). Finally, HF was independently predictive of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 2.17, 95% CI (1.66-2.85) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR 2.37, 95% CI (1.68-3.36).

CONCLUSION

Coexisting AF+HF was associated with a more labile and higher-risk population among Jordanian patients. Furthermore, coexisting HF independently predicted higher all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Efforts should be made to efficiently identify such cases early and treat them aggressively.

Asymptomatic vs. symptomatic atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcomes in heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

The outcome implications of asymptomatic vs. symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) in specific groups of patients according to clinical heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) need to be clarified.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, patients were categorized according to overt HF with LVEF≤40 %, or with LVEF>40 %, or without overt HF with LVEF40 %≤ or > 40 %, as well as according to the presence of asymptomatic or symptomatic AF.

RESULTS

A total of 8096 patients, divided into 8 groups according to HF and LVEF, were included with similar proportions of asymptomatic AF (ranging from 43 to 48 %). After a median follow-up of 730 [699 -748] days, the composite outcome (all-cause death and MACE) was significantly worse for patients with asymptomatic AF associated with HF and reduced LVEF vs. symptomatic AF patients of the same group (p = 0.004). On adjusted Cox regression analysis, asymptomatic AF patients with HF and reduced LVEF were independently associated with a higher risk for the composite outcome (aHR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.04-1.69) and all-cause death (aHR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.02-1.73) compared to symptomatic AF patients with HF and reduced LVEF. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that HF-LVEF≤40 % asymptomatic patients had the highest cumulative incidence of all-cause death and MACE (p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large European cohort of AF patients, the risk of the composite outcome at 2 years was not different between asymptomatic and symptomatic AF in the whole cohort but adverse implications for poor outcomes were found for asymptomatic AF in HF with LVEF≤40 %.

Relationship between coronary blood flow and improvement of cardiac function after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The relationship between coronary blood flow during atrial fibrillation (AF) and improvement of cardiac function after catheter ablation (CA) for persistent AF (PeAF) is not prominent; this study was conducted to evaluate this relationship.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study. Eighty-five patients with PeAF (resting heart rate < 100 bpm) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%) who had undergone coronary angiography within 1 week before CA were included. All patients could maintain a sinus rhythm for > 6 months after CA. The primary outcome was improvement of cardiac function with an LVEF cutoff value of > 50% during sinus rhythm 6 months after CA.

RESULTS

In the LVEF improvement group (N = 57), patients were younger, with a higher baseline diastolic blood pressure and lower baseline brain natriuretic peptide level than the no LVEF improvement group (N = 28). Heart rate at baseline and 6 months after CA and AF duration did not differ between the two groups. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count parameters was significantly higher in the LVEF improvement (P < 0.001) than in the no LVEF improvement group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed mean thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count as an independent factor for LVEF improvement (odds ratio, 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.17-2.54); P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Coronary blood flow in patients with PeAF is strongly associated with improved left ventricular systolic function after the restoration of sinus rhythm by CA for PeAF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Preventing new-onset heart failure: Intervening at stage A

Heart failure (HF) prevention is an urgent public health need with national and global implications. Stage A HF patients do not show HF symptoms or structural heart disease but are at risk of HF development. There are no unique recommendations on detecting Stage A patients. Patients in Stage A are heterogeneous; many patients have different combinations of risk factors and, therefore, have markedly different absolute risks for HF. Comprehensive strategies to prevent HF at Stage A include intensive blood pressure lowering, adequate glycemic and lipid management, and heart-healthy behaviors (adopting Life's Essential 8). First and foremost, it is imperative to improve public awareness of HF risk factors and implement healthy lifestyle choices very early. In addition, recognize the HF risk-enhancing factors, which are nontraditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors that identify individuals at high risk for HF (genetic susceptibility for HF, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, chronic inflammatory disease, sleep-disordered breathing, adverse pregnancy outcomes, radiation therapy, a history of cardiotoxic chemotherapy exposure, and COVID-19). Early use of biomarkers, imaging markers, and echocardiography (noninvasive measures of subclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction) may enhance risk prediction among individuals without established CV disease and prevent chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Efforts are needed to address social determinants of HF risk for primordial HF prevention.Central illustrationPolicies developed by organizations such as the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the American Diabetes Association to reduce CV disease events must go beyond secondary prevention and encompass primordial and primary prevention.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Predicts Thromboembolism and Heart Failure in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation - A Prospective Analysis From the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry

BACKGROUND

The prognostic effect of concomitant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been evaluated in a multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry, 1,396 patients with nonvalvular AF (1,018 men, 72.3±9.7 years old) were assessed prospectively; 72 (5.2%) had concomitant HCM. During a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range 3.5-5.3 years), 79 cases of thromboembolism (1.3 per 100 person-years) and 192 of heart failure (HF) (3.2 per 100 person-years) occurred. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the HCM group had a significantly greater incidence of thromboembolism (P=0.002 by log-rank test) and HF (P<0.0001 by a log-rank test) than the non-HCM group. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that persistent AF (adjusted hazard ratio 2.98, 95% confidence interval 1.56-6.21), the CHA2DS2-VASc score (1.35, 1.18-1.54), and concomitant HCM (2.48, 1.16-4.79) were significantly associated with thromboembolism. Conversely, concomitant HCM (2.81, 1.72-4.43), older age (1.07, 1.05-1.10), lower body mass index (0.95, 0.91-0.99), a history of HF (2.49, 1.77-3.52), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (0.98, 0.97-0.99) were significantly associated with the development of HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant HCM predicts the incidence of thromboembolism and HF in AF patients.

Weekend atrial fibrillation hospitalizations are associated with higher short-term mortality

BACKGROUND

Previous investigations have analysed the relationship between weekend (WE) admission and early death in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) patients without reaching univocal results. We systematically reviewed the available literature and performed a meta-analysis of data from cohort studies to estimate the association between WE admission and short-term mortality in AF patients.

METHODS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. We searched relevant publications using MEDLINE and Scopus from inception until 15 November 2022. Studies reporting the mortality risk as an adjusted odds ratio (OR), with relative 95% confidence interval (CI) comparing early (in-hospital or 30-day) mortality between patients admitted during the WE (Friday to Sunday) versus weekdays (WD) and having confirmed AF were included into the analysis. Data were pooled using a random-effects models with OR and related 95% CI.

RESULTS

Overall, 5.164.986 AF patients (mean age 69.7 years old, 47.6% males) enrolled in five retrospective investigations were considered for the analysis. A random-effect model evidenced that AF patients admitted during the WE had a higher risk of 30-day or in-hospital death (adjusted OR: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27, p = .003, I2 = 64.7%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed yielded results. A meta-regression analysis showed a relationship between mortality and the mean age of the studies included (p = .001) while no associations were identified using sex as moderating variables (p = .15).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted during WE for AF are characterised by an approximately 58% excess in the risk of early death.

Left ventricular functional recovery after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in heart failure: a prediction model

AIMS

Management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure (HF) remains complex. The Antwerp score, based on four parameters [QRS >120 ms (2 points), known aetiology (2 points), paroxysmal AF (1 point), severe atrial dilation (1 point)] adequately estimated the probability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after AF ablation in a single-centre cohort. The present study aims to externally validate this prediction model in a large European multi-centre cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 605 patients (61.1 ± 9.4 years, 23.8% females, 79.8% with persistent AF) with HF and impaired LVEF (<50%) undergoing AF ablation in 8 European centres were retrospectively identified. According to the LVEF changes at 12-month echocardiography, 427 (70%) patients fulfilled the '2021 Universal Definition of HF' criteria for LVEF recovery and were defined as 'responders'. External validation of the score yielded good discrimination and calibration {area under the curve 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.89], P < .001; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .29}. Patients with a score < 2 had a 93% probability of LVEF recovery as opposed to only 24% in patients with a score > 3. Responders experienced more often positive ventricular remodelling [odds ratio (OR) 8.91, 95% CI 4.45-17.84, P < .001], fewer HF hospitalizations (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05-0.18, P < .001) and lower mortality (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this multi-centre study, a simple four-parameter score predicted LVEF recovery after AF ablation in patients with HF and discriminated clinical outcomes. These findings support the use of the Antwerp score to standardize shared decision-making regarding AF ablation referral in future clinical studies.

Tic-Tac: A Translational Approach in Mechanisms Associated with Irregular Heartbeat and Sinus Rhythm Restoration in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac condition predominantly affecting older adults, characterized by irregular heartbeat rhythm. The condition often leads to significant disability and increased mortality rates. Traditionally, two therapeutic strategies have been employed for its treatment: heart rate control and rhythm control. Recent clinical studies have emphasized the critical role of early restoration of sinus rhythm in improving patient outcomes. The persistence of the irregular rhythm allows for the progression and structural remodeling of the atria, eventually leading to irreversible stages, as observed clinically when AF becomes permanent. Cardioversion to sinus rhythm alters this progression pattern through mechanisms that are still being studied. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for maintaining AF and how they are modified during sinus rhythm restoration using existing therapeutic strategies at different stages of clinical investigation. Moreover, we explore potential future therapeutic approaches, including the promising prospect of gene therapy.

Evaluation of left atrial and ventricular remodeling in atrial fibrillation subtype by using speckle tracking echocardiography

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with cardiac structural and functional remodeling. We investigated the left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) changes in AF subtypes by using two-dimensional echocardiography strain techniques.

Methods

The study population consisted of 102 subjects with sinus rhythm (control group) and 463 patients with AF, among which 284 patients had paroxysmal AF (PAF) and 179 patients had persistent AF (PerAF). A speckle tracking automatic functional imaging software was used to perform the strain analysis.

Results

Patients with AF had dilated LA maximum and minimum volume, decreased LA reservoir strain, lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and impaired global longitudinal strain (GLS) compared to those of the sinus rhythm control group. In patients with PerAF, the LA maximum and minimum volumes were larger, and the LA reservoir strain [PAF vs. PerAF, 28% (21,33) vs. 19% (14, 28), P < 0.05], LVEF, and absolute GLS value (PAF vs. PerAF, -16.9 ± 3.3 vs. -14.1 ± 3.5%) were lower than those in patients with PAF. Patients with AF regardless of LA enlargement had decreased LA reservoir strain and lower LVEF and absolute GLS value than those in the sinus rhythm control group.

Conclusion

Compared with those with normal sinus rhythm, patients with AF had dilated LA volume and impaired LA function, which were further worsened in patients with PerAF than those in patients with PAF. LA functional impairment occurred before LA enlargement. Left atrioventricular remodeling happened across different stages of AF development.

Effect of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Mid-Range or Preserved Ejection Fraction - Pooled Analysis of the AF Frontier Ablation Registry and Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry

BACKGROUND

A recent randomized trial demonstrated that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF) is associated with a reduction in death or heart failure. However, the effect of catheter ablation for AF in patients with heart failure with mid-range or preserved EF is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We screened 899 AF patients (72.4% male, mean age 68.4 years) with heart failure and left ventricular EF ≥40% from 2 Japanese multicenter AF registries: the Atrial Fibrillation registry to Follow the long-teRm Outcomes and use of aNTIcoagulants aftER Ablation (AF Frontier Ablation Registry) as the ablation group (525 patients who underwent ablation) and the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry as the medical therapy group (374 patients who did not undergo ablation). Propensity score matching was performed in these 2 registries to yield 106 matched patient pairs. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. At 24.6 months, the ablation group had a significantly lower incidence of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.70; P=0.004) than the medical therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation for AF in patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved EF was associated with a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure.

Use of a new non-contrast-enhanced BOOST cardiac MR sequence before electrical cardioversion or ablation of atrial fibrillation-a pilot study

Introduction

Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is the most common source of embolization in atrial fibrillation (AF). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard method for LAA thrombus exclusion. Our pilot study aimed to compare the efficacy of a new non-contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sequence (BOOST) with TEE for the detection of LAA thrombus and to evaluate the usefulness of BOOST images for planning radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) compared with left atrial (LA) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). We also attempted to assess the patients' subjective experiences with TEE and CMR.

Methods

Patients with AF undergoing either electrical cardioversion or RFCA were enrolled. Participants underwent pre-procedural TEE and CMR scans to evaluate LAA thrombus status and pulmonary vein anatomy. Patient experiences with TEE and CMR were assessed using a questionnaire developed by our team. Some patients scheduled for RFCA also had pre-procedural LA contrast-enhanced CT. In such cases, the operating physician was asked to subjectively define the quality of the CT and CMR scan on a scale of 1-10 (1 = worst, 10 = best) and comment on CMR's usefulness in RFCA planning.

Results

Seventy-one patients were enrolled. In 94.4%, both TEE and CMR excluded, and in 1 patient, both modalities reported the presence of LAA thrombus. In 1 patient, TEE was inconclusive, but CMR excluded LAA thrombus. In 2 patients, CMR could not exclude the presence of thrombus, but in 1 of those cases, TEE was also indecisive. During TEE, 67%, during CMR, only 1.9% of patients reported pain (p < 0.0001), and 89% would prefer CMR in case of a repeat examination. The quality of the left atrial contrast-enhanced CT scans was better compared with the image quality of the CMR BOOST sequence [8 (7-9) vs. 6 (5-7), p < 0.0001]. Still, the CMR images were useful for procedural planning in 91% of cases.

Conclusion

The new CMR BOOST sequence provides appropriate image quality for ablation planning. The sequence might be useful for excluding larger LAA thrombi; however, its accuracy in detecting smaller thrombi is limited. Most patients preferred CMR over TEE in this indication.

The complex interplay between right ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation - a narrative review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common sustained arrhythmias in clinical practice, associated with multiple comorbidities and complication. The potential predictors of AF onset and perpetuation or specific drivers of complications need future investigation. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction plays an important role in the development of new-onset AF warranting in-depth analysis in relation to AF. RV may play a significant role in a better characterization of the cardiac substrate of AF patients. The relation between RV dysfunction and AF is bidirectional as AF may be one of the causes of RV dysfunction and their coexistence worsens the overall patient prognosis. Our aim is to present in a narrative review the most relevant data regarding the complex relationship between AF and RV dysfunction.

Atrial Fibrillation can adversely impact Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction by its association with Heart Failure Progression and Mortality: A Post-Hoc Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the TOPCAT Americas Trial

AIMS

Prevalent atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with excess cardiovascular (CV) death (D) and hospitalizations (H) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (pEF). We evaluated if it had an independent role in excess CVD in HFpEF and studied its impact on cause-specific mortality and HF morbidity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts from the TOPCAT Americas trial to account for confounding by other co-morbidities. Two prevalent AF presentations at study entry were compared: (i) subjects with Any AF event by history or on electrocardiogram (ECG) with PSM subjects without an AF event and (ii) subjects in AF on ECG with PSM subjects in sinus rhythm. We analyzed cause-specific modes of death and HF morbidity during a mean follow-up period of 2.9 years. A total of 584 subjects with Any AF event and 418 subjects in AF on ECG were matched. Any AF was associated with increased CVH [hazard ratio (HR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.61, P = 0.003], HFH (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.86, P = 0.004), pump failure death (PFD) (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.05-3.62, P = 0.035), and HF progression from New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes I/II to III/IV (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.62, P = 0.02). Atrial fibrillation on ECG was associated with increased risk of CVD (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.09, P = 0.039), PFD (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.11-4.40, P = 0.024), and CVH and HFH (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.72, P = 0.006 and HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22-2.23, P = 0.001, respectively). Atrial fibrillation was not associated with risk of sudden death. Both Any AF and AF on ECG cohorts were associated with PFD in NYHA class III/IV HF.

CONCLUSION

Prevalent AF can be an independent risk factor for adverse CV outcomes by its selective association with worsening HF, HFH, and PFD in HFpEF. Prevalent AF was not associated with excess sudden death risk in HFpEF. Atrial fibrillation was also associated with HF progression in early symptomatic HFpEF and PFD in advanced HFpEF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TOPCAT trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov:identifier NCT00094302.

Use of Mendelian randomization to evaluate the effect of atrial fibrillation on cardiovascular diseases and cardiac death

AIMS

Several observational studies indicated that atrial fibrillation might aggravate other cardiovascular diseases apart from ischaemic stroke. However, it remains to be determined whether these associations reveal independent causation. Using Mendelian randomization (MR), we systematically investigated how genetically predicted atrial fibrillation affected other cardiovascular diseases and cardiac death.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Summary-level data for atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular diseases were obtained from public genome-wide association study data. The random inverse-variance weighted method was treated as the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses (including weighted median, MR-Egger, and multivariable MR methods) were also performed. Atrial fibrillation was significantly associated with higher risks of heart failure [odds ratio (OR): 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.28; P < 0.001], ischaemic stroke (OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.17-1.25; P < 0.001), transient ischaemic attack (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15; P < 0.001), peripheral artery diseases (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.15; P = 0.002), cardiac death (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.15; P = 0.008), and hypertension (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11; P = 0.010), without effects on coronary heart disease or pulmonary embolism. Associations for heart failure and ischaemic stroke remained robust to the sensitivity analyses. MR-Egger method (P > 0.05) and funnel plot yielded no indication of directional pleiotropy. The leave-one-out analysis suggested that the causal associations were not driven by individual single nucleotide polymorphism.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive MR analysis verified the causal associations between atrial fibrillation and high risks of heart failure, ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral artery diseases, cardiac death, and hypertension. Interventions to reduce cardiovascular diseases beyond ischaemic stroke are warranted in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: real-world data in a large community

AIMS

The objective of the present study is to assess the bidirectional association between heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) using real-world data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From an electronic health recording with a population of 3 799 885 adult subjects, those with prevalent or incident HF were selected and followed throughout a study period of 5 years. Prevalence and incidence of AF, and their impact in the risk for acute HF hospitalization, worsening renal function, ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, and all-cause mortality were identified. We analysed all incident and prevalent patients with HF and AF, 128 086 patients (S1), and subsequently analysed a subset of patients with incident HF and AF, 57 354 patients (S2). We analysed all incident and prevalent patients with HF and AF, 128 086 patients (S1), and subsequently a subset of patients with incident HF and AF, 57 354 patients (S2). The prevalence of AF was 59 906 (46.7%) of the HF patients, while incidence in the S2 was 231/1000 patients/year. In both cohorts, S1 and S2, AF significantly increases the risk of acute heart failure hospitalization [incidence 79.1/1000 and 97.5/1000 patients/year; HR 1.53 (1.48-1.59 95% CI) and HR 1.32 (1.24-1.41 95% CI), respectively], risk of decreased renal function (eGFR reduced by >20%) [66.2/1000 and 94.0/1000 patients/year; HR 1.13 (1.09-1.18 95% CI) and HR 1.22 (1.14-1.31 95% CI), respectively] and all-cause mortality [203/1000 and 294/1000 patients/year; HR 1.62 (1.58-1.65 95% CI) and HR 1.65 (1.59-1.70 95% CI), respectively]. The number of episodes of hospitalization for acute heart failure was also significantly higher in the AF patients (27 623 vs. 10 036, P < 0.001). However, the risk for ischaemic stroke was reduced in the AF subjects [HR 0.66 (0.63-0.74 95% CI)], probably due to the anticoagulant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

AF is associated with an increment in the risk of episodes of acute heart failure as well as decline of renal function and increment of all-cause mortality.

Atrial fibrillation-induced tachycardiomyopathy and heart failure: an underappreciated and elusive condition

Many patients with persistent, chronic, or frequently recurring paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) may develop a tachycardiomyopathy (TCM) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure (HF), which is reversible upon restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, when feasible, or via better and tighter ventricular rate (VR) control. Mechanisms involved in producing this leading cause of TCM (AF-TCM) include loss of atrial contraction, irregular heart rate, fast VR, neurohumoral activation, and structural myocardial changes. The most important of all mechanisms relates to optimal VR control, which seems to be an elusive target. Uncontrolled AF may also worsen preexisting LV dysfunction and exacerbate HF symptoms. Data, albeit less robust, also point to deleterious effects of slow VRs on LV function. Thus, a J-shaped relationship between VR and clinical outcome has been suggested, with the optimal VR control hovering at ~ 65 bpm, ranging between 60 and 80 bpm; VRs above and below this range may confer higher morbidity and mortality rates. A convergence of recent guidelines is noted towards a stricter rather than a more lenient VR control with target heart rate < 80 bpm at rest and < 110 bpm during moderate exercise which seems to prevent TCM or improve LV function and exercise capacity and relieve TCM-related symptoms and signs. Of course, restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm is always a most desirable target, when feasible, either with drugs or more likely with ablation. All these issues are herein reviewed, current guidelines are discussed and relevant data are tabulated and pictorially illustrated.

Impact of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Recurrence on the Development of Long-Term Adverse Clinical Events Following Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With Systolic Impairment: A Single-Center Observational Study

Background

Catheter ablation can improve long‐term prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation with systolic impairment. However, atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence increases during long‐term follow‐up. We aimed to investigate the impact of ATA recurrence on the development of long‐term adverse clinical events following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and to identify predictors for the development of adverse clinical events.

Methods and Results

This single‐center observational study included 75 patients with systolic impairment (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) who underwent the first catheter ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation at our institution (median follow‐up period: 3.5 [range: 2.4–4.7] years). We compared the cumulative incidence of adverse clinical events (all‐cause death, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction) between the groups with and without ATA recurrence following the first and last procedures. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors for developing adverse clinical events. Twenty‐one patients (28%) developed adverse clinical events at a median of 2.2 (range: 0.64–2.8) years following the first procedure. The proportion of freedom from adverse clinical events following the first procedure was significantly lower in the ATA recurrence group than in the nonrecurrence group (41% [n=40] versus 95% [n=35], P<0.0005); the proportion following the last procedure also showed a similar tendency (35% [n=26] versus 57% [n=49], P<0.0001). ATA recurrence emerged as an independent predictor for adverse clinical events following both procedures after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusions

ATA recurrence following catheter ablation procedure could predict adverse clinical events in patients with atrial fibrillation with systolic impairment.

Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, affecting more than 33 million people worldwide. Despite important advances in therapy, AF's incidence remains high, and treatment often results in recurrence of the arrhythmia. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular changes that (1) trigger AF and (2) occur after the onset of AF will help to identify novel therapeutic targets. Over the past 20 years, a large body of research has shown that intracellular Ca2+ handling is dramatically altered in AF. While some of these changes are arrhythmogenic, other changes counteract cellular arrhythmogenic mechanisms (Calcium Signaling Silencing). The intracellular Na+ concentration ([Na+])i is a key regulator of intracellular Ca2+ handling in cardiac myocytes. Despite its importance in the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ handling, little is known about [Na+]i, its regulation, and how it might be changed in AF. Previous work suggests that there might be increases in the late component of the atrial Na+ current (INa,L) in AF, suggesting that [Na+]i levels might be high in AF. Indeed, a pharmacological blockade of INa,L has been suggested as a treatment for AF. Here, we review calcium signaling silencing and changes in intracellular Na+ homeostasis during AF. We summarize the proposed arrhythmogenic mechanisms associated with increases in INa,L during AF and discuss the evidence from clinical trials that have tested the pharmacological INa,L blocker ranolazine in the treatment of AF.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) and Cardiac Arrhythmias

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a major role in cardiovascular health and disease. Short-term RAAS activation controls water and salt retention and causes vasoconstriction, which are beneficial for maintaining cardiac output in low blood pressure and early stage heart failure. However, prolonged RAAS activation is detrimental, leading to structural remodeling and cardiac dysfunction. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are activated to counterbalance the effect of RAAS and sympathetic nervous system by facilitating water and salt excretion and causing vasodilation. Neprilysin is a major NP-degrading enzyme that degrades multiple vaso-modulatory substances. Although the inhibition of neprilysin alone is not sufficient to counterbalance RAAS activation in cardiovascular diseases (e.g., hypertension and heart failure), a combination of angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) was highly effective in several clinical trials and may modulate the risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. This review summarizes the possible link between ARNI and cardiac arrhythmias and discusses potential underlying mechanisms, providing novel insights about the therapeutic role and safety profile of ARNI in the cardiovascular system.