Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of catheter and stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

Major in-hospital complications after catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: individual case analysis of 43 031 procedures

AIMS

In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined the incidences of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and stroke around AF, AFL, and VT ablations in four German tertiary centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were coded by the G-DRG- and OPS-systems. Uniform code search terms were applied defining both the types of ablations for AF, AFL, and VT and the occurrence of major adverse events including femoral vascular complications, iatrogenic tamponade, stroke, and in-hospital death. Importantly, all complications were individually reviewed based on patient-level source records. Overall, 43 031 ablations were analysed (30 361 AF; 9364 AFL; 3306 VT). The number of ablations/year more than doubled from 2005 (n = 1569) to 2020 (n = 3317) with 3 times and 2.5 times more AF and VT ablations in 2020 (n = 2404 and n = 301, respectively) as compared to 2005 (n = 817 and n = 120, respectively), but a rather stable number of AFL ablations (n = 554 vs. n = 612). Major peri-procedural complications occurred in 594 (1.4%) patients. Complication rates were 1.1% (n = 325) for AF, 1.0% (n = 95) for AFL, and 5.3% (n = 175) for VT. With an increase in complex AF/VT procedures, the overall complication rate significantly increased (0.76% in 2005 vs. 1.81% in 2020; P = 0.004); but remained low over time. Following patient-adjudication, all in-hospital cardiac tamponades (0.7%) and strokes (0.2%) were related to ablation. Major femoral vascular complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 0.4% of all patients. The in-hospital mortality rate adjudicated to be ablation-related was lower than the coded mortality rate: AF: 0.03% vs. 0.04%; AFL: 0.04% vs. 0.14%; VT: 0.42% vs. 1.48%.

CONCLUSION

Major adverse events are low and comparable after catheter ablation for AFL and AF (∼1.0%), whereas they are five times higher for VT ablations. In the presence of an increase in complex ablation procedures, a moderate but significant increase in overall complications from 2005-20 was observed. Individual case analysis demonstrated a lower than coded ablation-related in-hospital mortality. This highlights the importance of individual case adjudication when analysing administrative data.

Thoracoscopic epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation: Safety, efficacy, single center experience

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with reduced quality of life and increased risk of ischaemic cerebrovascular events. The left atrial epicardial ablation procedures have evolved towards a successful and safe rhythm control strategy for patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal, persistent or post-ablation AF or with a high risk of catheter ablation failure. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic ablation at our instituiton.

METHODS

We observed 81 patients undergoing thoracoscopic ablation from January 2015 to December 2019.

RESULTS

The mean age was 61.3±8.5 years and the average duration of AF was 3.1±2.6 years. The cohort consisted of 16.5% of paroxysmal AF, 36.7% persistent, and 46.8% of long-standing AF. The procedure was completed in 79 patients; during follow-up, 15 patients (19%) received radiofrequency ablation. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was 55.7% after a follow-up (FUP) period of 3.1±1.4 years. At the follow-up visit, sinus rhythm was present in 81% of patients. No relationships between arrhythmia recurrence and BMI, LVEF, left atrial dimension, gender, and AF duration were found. Major complications were noticed in 4 patients (5.0%); 2 had peripheral embolisation, 2 patients were converted to a sternotomy. At the time of the FUP visit, 25.3% of patients were using antiarrhythmic and 74.7% were still using anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

In the majority of patients, sinus rhythm remained despite a considerable atrial tachycardia recurrence rate, with a relatively low percentage of patients on antiarrythmic drugs.

Diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for the malignant left atrial appendage: European Heart Rhythm Association physician survey

AIMS

Patients with atrial fibrillation who despite taking oral anti-coagulant therapy (OAT) suffer a stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) without vascular cause or who develop left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus (LAAT) should be considered as having malignant LAA. The optimal treatment strategy to reduce SSE risk in such patients is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for malignant LAA practiced in European cardiac centres.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An 18-item online questionnaire on malignant LAA was disseminated by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee. A total of 196 physicians participated in the survey. There seems to be high confidence in transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging, considering LAAT diagnosis. Switching to another direct oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) is the preferred initial step for the treatment of malignant LAA followed by a switch to vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular-weight heparin, or continued/optimized DOAC dosage, whereas LAA closure is the last option. Left atrial appendage closure is a viable option in patients with embolic stroke despite OAT and no evidence of thrombus at TEE (empty LAA) after comprehensive diagnostic measures to exclude other sources of embolism.

CONCLUSION

This EHRA survey provides a snapshot of the contemporary management of patients diagnosed with malignant LAA. Currently, the majority of patients are treated on an outpatient basis with either shifting from VKA to DOAC or from one DOAC to another. Left atrial appendage closure in this population seems to be reserved for patients with higher bleeding risk or complications of malignant LAA, such as stroke.