Bipolar ablation of therapy-refractory ventricular arrhythmias: application of a dedicated approach

Bipolar endo-epicardial RF ablation: Animal feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) is a method used to treat the arrhythmia substrate resistant to unipolar ablation. Few studies have addressed endo-epicardial B-RFA.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate chronic lesions resulting from endo-epicardial B-RFA and to determine optimal settings for such procedures in an animal model.

METHODS

In 7 pigs, up to 5 radiofrequency applications per animal were performed with 2 electrodes placed on both sides of the left ventricular free wall. Current was delivered for 60 seconds by a generator dedicated for B-RFA with power settings of 25, 30, 35, 40, and 50 W.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks after ablation, 31 lesions were assessed. Their maximal cross-sectional area ranged from 7.2 to 68 mm2 and correlated with total power delivered (r = 0.53), with temperature increment at the endocardial catheter (r = 0.65), and inversely with temperature decrement at the epicardial catheter (r = 0.54). For power values between 30 and 40 W, the lesion area did not differ significantly (P = .92). Lesion depth ranged from 1.9 to 11 mm and correlated with impedance decrement (r = 0.5). Lesions were transmural in 8 cases. Lesion depth/wall thickness ratio was on average 0.6 ± 0.3, with the smallest value for 25 W (0.5 ± 0.3) and the largest for 50 W (0.8 ± 0.3). Steam pops occurred at a power range of 30-50 W, with an incidence of 1 in 5 applications, with 1 case of fatal tamponade at 40 W. Impedance decrement, endocardial catheter temperature increment, and endocardial electrogram amplitude decrement were greater during applications with steam pops.

CONCLUSION

Chronic lesions resulting from endo-epicardial B-RFA appear smaller and less often transmural compared with acute lesions described in the literature. The incidence of steam pops during endo-epicardial B-RFA is relatively high even at low powers.

Exploring the Full Potential of Radiofrequency Technology: A Practical Guide to Advanced Radiofrequency Ablation for Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is an established strategy to prevent ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence and ICD shocks. Yet delivery of durable lesion sets by means of traditional unipolar radiofrequency ablation remains challenging, and left ventricular transmurality is rarely achieved. Failure to ablate and eliminate functionally relevant areas is particularly common in deep intramyocardial substrates, e.g. septal VT and cardiomyopathies. Here, we aim to give a practical-orientated overview of advanced and emerging RF ablation technologies to target these complex VT substrates. We summarize recent evidence in support of these technologies and share experiences from a tertiary VT centre to highlight important "hands-on" considerations for operators new to advanced RF ablation strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of innovative and modified radiofrequency ablation approaches have been proposed to increase energy delivery to the myocardium and maximize RF lesion dimensions and depth. These include measures of impedance modulation, combinations of simultaneous unipolar ablations or true bipolar ablation, intramyocardial RF delivery via wires or extendable RF needles and investigational linear or spherical catheter designs. Recent new clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of these investigational technologies and strategies merits a re-evaluation of their role and clinic application for percutaneous VT ablations. Complexity of substrates targeted with percutaneous VT ablation is increasing and requires detailed preprocedural imaging to characterize the substrate to inform the procedural approach and selection of ablation technology. Depending on local experience, options for additional and/or complementary interventional treatments should be considered upfront in challenging substrates to improve the success rates of index procedures. Advanced RF technologies available for clinical VT ablations include impedance modulation via hypotonic irrigation or additional dispersive patches and simultaneous unipolar as well as true bipolar ablation. Promising investigational RF technologies involve an extendable needle RF catheter, intramyocardial RF delivery over intentionally perforated wires as well as a variety of innovative ablation catheter designs including multipolar linear, spherical and partially insulated ablation catheters.

Bipolar catheter ablation with dedicated radiofrequency system for highly refractory ventricular arrhythmia-Does the rate of success depend on arrhythmia origin?

INTRODUCTION

Despite rapid technological progress, some arrhythmias are still resistant to standard unipolar ablation. These include arrhythmias arising from the base of the heart, cardiac crux, or epicardium. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) may be useful in some cases, however, data on the efficacy of this approach in various arrhythmia localizations are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of B-RFA in patients with ventricular arrhythmias originating from various locations, occurring refractory to standard unipolar ablation approaches.

METHODS

An observational, single center study was conducted over a 30-month period. B-RFA were performed using dedicated radio frequency (RF) generator and electroanatomic mapping system.

RESULTS

Twenty-four procedures, in 23 patients with a median (range) of 1 (1-2) previously failed unipolar ablation procedures, were included in the final analysis. There were 12 ablations of ventricular arrhythmias originating from interventricular septum with an acute success rate of 75%, and 12 from left ventricular (LV) summit with an acute success rate of 58%. The midterm success rate (median interquartile range follow-up of 205 days [188-338]) was 66% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

B-RFA is a promising method of catheter ablation for refractory cardiac arrhythmias. A higher success rate was observed in ablation for difficult ventricular arrhythmias originating from interventricular septal region than LV summit.

Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

Bailout Deep Septal LV Pacing to Treat Inadvertent Complete AV Block During Complex Ablation Procedure

We present a case of persistent complete atrioventricular block that occurred during the diagnostic portion of a premature ventricular contractions' radiofrequency ablation in a complex heart failure patient. The case was managed by bailout deep left ventricular septal pacing after bipolar radiofrequency elimination of premature ventricular contractions.

Bipolar ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Step-by-step

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of intramural ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) may require advanced ablation techniques to achieve effective energy transfer to the targeted tissue. As an alternative to standard RF ablation, catheter ablation can also be conducted in bipolar configuration when two ablation catheters participate in the RF circuit. This strategy has proved to result in deeper lesion formation and may be effective for eliminating arrhythmias that have been refractory to standard ablation. In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide on when and how to perform bipolar ablation of VAs.

Twenty-five years of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a look back and a look forward

This article will discuss the past, present, and future of ventricular tachycardia ablation and the continuing contribution of the Europace journal as the platform for publication of milestone research papers in this field of ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite substantial progress in medical and device-based heart failure (HF) therapy, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain a major challenge. Here we review contemporary management of VA in the context of HF with one particular focus on recent advances in imaging and catheter ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Besides limited efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), their potentially life-threatening side effects are increasingly acknowledged. On the other hand, with tremendous advances in catheter technology, electroanatomical mapping, imaging, and understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, catheter ablation has evolved into a safe, efficacious therapy. In fact, recent randomized trials support early catheter ablation, demonstrating superiority over AAD. Importantly, CMR imaging with gadolinium contrast has emerged as a central tool for the management of VA complicating HF: CMR is not only essential for an accurate diagnosis of the underlying entity and subsequent treatment decisions, but also improves risk stratification for SCD prevention and patient selection for ICD therapy. Finally, 3-dimensional characterization of arrhythmogenic substrate by CMR and imaging-guided ablation approaches substantially enhance procedural safety and efficacy. VA management in HF patients is highly complex and should be addressed in a multidisciplinary approach, preferably at specialized centers. While recent evidence supports early catheter ablation of VA, an impact on mortality remains to be demonstrated. Moreover, risk stratification for ICD therapy may have to be reconsidered, taking into account imaging, genetic testing, and other parameters beyond left ventricular function.

Best ablation strategy in patients with premature ventricular contractions with multiple morphology: a single-centre experience

AIMS

This study aimed to examine the clinical benefits of targeted ablation of all Premature ventricular complex (PVC) morphologies vs. predominant PVC only.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 171 consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ≥2 PVC morphology with high burden (>10%/day) undergoing their first ablation procedure were included in the analysis. At the initial procedure, prevalent PVC alone was ablated in the majority. However, at the redo, all PVC morphologies were targeted for ablation. : At the first procedure, 152 (89%) patients received ablation of the dominant PVC only. In the remaining 19 (11%) patients, all PVC morphologies were ablated. At two years, high PVC burden was detected in 89 (52%) patients. Repeat procedure was performed in 78 of 89, where all PVC morphologies were ablated. At 5 years after the repeat procedure, 71 (91%) had PVC burden of <5% [3.8 ± 1.1% vs. 15.4 ± 4.3% in successful vs. failed subjects (P < 0.001)]. In patients with low PVC burden after the initial procedure, LVEF improved from 37.5% to 41.6% [mean difference (MD): 3.39 ± 2.9%, P < 0.001], whereas a reduction in LVEF from 39.8% to 34.5% (MD: 6.45 ± 4.7%, P < 0.001) was recorded in patients with high PVC burden. One year after the repeat procedure, LVEF improved from 36.2% to 41.7% (MD: 5.5 ± 4.3%, P < 0.001) in patients with successful ablation.

CONCLUSION

In this observational series, ablation of all PVC morphologies was associated with significantly lower PVC burden and improvement of LVEF at long-term follow-up, compared with ablation of the dominant morphology only.

Catheter ablation of intramural outflow tract premature ventricular complexes: a multicentre study

AIMS

Ablation of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias may be limited by a deep intramural location of the arrhythmogenic source. This study evaluates the acute and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing ablation of intramural outflow tract premature ventricular complexes (PVCs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter series included patients with structurally normal heart or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and intramural outflow tract PVCs defined by: (a) ≥ 2 of the following criteria: (1) earliest endocardial or epicardial activation < 20ms pre-QRS; (2) Similar activation in different chambers; (3) no/transient PVC suppression with ablation at earliest endocardial/epicardial site; or (b) earliest ventricular activation recorded in a septal coronary vein. Ninety-two patients were included, with a mean PVC burden of 21.5±10.9%. Twenty-six patients had had previous ablations. All PVCs had inferior axis, with LBBB pattern in 68%. In 29 patients (32%) direct mapping of the intramural septum was performed using an insulated wire or multielectrode catheter, and in 13 of these cases the earliest activation was recorded within a septal vein. Most patients required special ablation techniques (one or more), including sequential unipolar ablation in 73%, low-ionic irrigation in 26%, bipolar ablation in 15% and ethanol ablation in 1%. Acute PVC suppression was achieved in 75% of patients. Following the procedure, the PVC burden was reduced to 5.8±8.4%. The mean follow-up was 15±14 months and 16 patients underwent a repeat ablation.

CONCLUSION

Ablation of intramural PVCs is challenging; acute arrhythmia elimination is achieved in 3/4 patients, and non-conventional approaches are often necessary for success.

Bipolar Endo-Epicardial Radiofrequency Ablation of Therapy-Resistant Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Brief Case Series

Despite extensive conventional endoepicardial ablation, significant intramural arrhythmogenic substrate may remain out of reach of unipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The authors present clinical findings and procedural workflow for bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) with 1 catheter placed against the endocardium and the other in the pericardial sac to ablate refractory ventricular arrhythmias. No serious adverse events occurred during B-RFA procedures, and the short-term and midterm clinical results were satisfactory. Optimal catheter choice and ablation parameters settings for B-RFA remain to be determined.

Adverse Prognosis of Patients with Septal Substrate After VT Ablation Due to Electrical Storm

BACKGROUND

Data about ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with electrical storm (ES) is limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the prognostic outcome of patients undergoing VT ablation after ES with and without a septal substrate.

METHODS

In this large single-center study, consecutive patients presenting with ES and undergoing VT ablation from June 2018 to April 2021 were included. Patients with septal substrate were compared with patients without septal substrate regarding endpoints of cardiovascular mortality, VT recurrences, recurrences of the clinical VT, and rehospitalization rates.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients undergoing a first VT ablation because of electrical storm (ES) were included (age 65 ± 13 years, 86% male, 45% ischemic cardiomyopathy). Major complications occurred in 11% of all patients with increased postinterventional third-degree atrioventricular blocks among patients with septal substrate (9% vs 0%; P = 0.063). Partial ablation successes were similar (95% with a septal substrate vs 100% without a septal substrate; P = 0.251). Complete ablation success was achieved in 63% with a septal substrate and in 87% without a septal substrate (P = 0.004). After a median 22 months of follow-up, patients with septal substrate died significantly more often from cardiovascular causes (26% vs 7%; log-rank P = 0.018). In univariate analysis cardiovascular mortality for ES patients with septal substrate was 4.1-fold higher (HR: 4.192; CI: 1.194-14.719; P = 0.025). Independent predictors of adverse outcome in multivariable regression analysis were presence of septal substrate (HR: 5.723; P = 0.025) and increased age (HR: 1.104; P = 0.003). Recurrences of any ventricular arrhythmia (67% vs 56%; log rank P = 0.554) and rehospitalization rates (80% vs 66%; log rank P = 0.515) were similar between groups. Recurrences of clinical VT were similar (7% vs 2%; P = 0.252).

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of a septal substrate is associated with adverse long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients admitted for VT ablation after ES. Despite decreased acute ablation successes in these patients, VT recurrence rates were similar to those without a septal substrate during follow-up.