Safety profile and long-term efficacy of very high-power short-duration (60-70 W) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results of a large comparative analysis

HIgh Power short duration radiofrequency ablation or cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (HIPAF trial)

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a first-line treatment option for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoballoon ablation (CBA) are commonly used modalities. Recent studies demonstrated the superiority and potential benefits of very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) RFA using 70 W compared to conventional RFA (<50 W). Prospective randomized data comparing vHPSD RFA with 70 W with the frequently used CBA in the setting of PAF are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a randomized non-inferiority trial involving 170 patients undergoing de novo PVI for PAF. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo vHPSD RFA or to receive CBA. The composite primary endpoint consisted of (i) any atrial arrhythmia, (ii) new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) onset, and (iii) re-ablation during 1 year after index procedure. The non-inferiority margin was predefined as a 10% lower 1-year event-free survival rate in vHPSD compared to CBA (delta = -0.1). A total of 170 patients with symptomatic PAF were enrolled and assigned to undergo de novo PVI, with 84 receiving vHPSD and 86 undergoing CBA. The overall study population had a mean age of 65 ± 11 years and included 50.6% women. For vHPSD PVI a 70 W/7 s anterior and 70 W/5 s posterior protocol including 3D mapping was used. Cryoballoon ablation was performed as usual. Successful PVI was achieved in all patients. Overall procedure time for vHPSD was significantly longer (81.1 ± 20.0 vs. 67.7 ± 17.2 min; P < 0.001). However, the mere ablation time was comparable (39.3 ± 15.5 vs. 36.7 ± 14.5 min; P = 0.285). Fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast medium were significantly lower for vHPSD PVI (9.2 ± 3.6 vs. 10.5 ± 4.3 min; P = 0.031; 15.5 ± 5.8 vs. 43.1 ± 30.0 mL; P < 0.001). Complication rates were comparable between groups. One pulmonary vein stenosis occurred after vHPSD. Three pericardial effusions and two transient ischaemic attack were reported after CBA. After a median follow-up of 367 days, 73.8% [n = 62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 63.1-82.8%] of patients in the vHPSD PVI group and 81.4% (n = 70, 95% CI: 71.6-89.0%) in the CBA group remained free of any event. Non-inferiority of vHPSD PVI compared to CBA PVI could not be demonstrated, with a difference of -0.076 [95% CI: (-0.201 to 0.049)] in event-free survival rates off AADs, as the 95% CI includes the delta of -0.1.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized non-inferiority trial comparing vHPSD RFA to CBA for PVI in patients with PAF, non-inferiority of vHPSD RFA could not be shown. Both methods showed comparable safety outcome with a shorter procedure time for CBA.

Renal function and periprocedural complications in patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation: A comparison between uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants and phenprocoumon administration

BACKGROUND

Data regarding uninterrupted oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during catheter ablation for left atrial arrhythmias is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of periprocedural uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with uninterrupted phenprocoumon in patients with CKD undergoing left atrial catheter ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation between 2016 and 2019 with underlying chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 15 and 45 ml/min). The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy or warfarin presents a superior safety profile in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. We compared periprocedural complications (arteriovenous fistula, aneurysm, significant hematoma (> 5 cm)) and/or bleeding (drop in hemoglobin of >2 g/dl, pericardial effusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, other bleeding, stroke) between patients receiving either uninterrupted DOAC or warfarin therapy. Secondary analysis included patient baseline characteristics as well as procedural data. A total of 188 patients (female n = 108 (57%), mean age 75.3 ± 8.1 years, mean GFR 36.8 ± 6 ml/min) were included in this study. Underlying arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation (n = 104, 55.3%) and atypical atrial flutter (n = 84, 44.7%). Of these, n = 132 patients (70%) were under a DOAC medication, and n = 56 (30%) were under phenprocoumon. Major groin complications including pseudoaneurysm and/or AV fistula occurred in 8.9% of patients in the phenprocoumon group vs. 11.3% of patients in the DOAC group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). Incidence of cardiac tamponade (2.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.55) and stroke (0% vs. 0%) were low in both DOAC and phenprocoumon groups with similar post-procedural drops in hemoglobin levels (1.1±1 g/dl vs 1.1±0.9 g/dl; p = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

The type of anticoagulation had no significant influence on bleeding or thromboembolic events as well as groin complications in this retrospective study. Despite observing an increased rate of groin complications, the uninterrupted use of DOAC or phenprocoumon during left atrial catheter ablation in patients with CKD appears to be feasible and effective.

Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures

Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.

Very High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding safety and long-term outcome of very high-power-short duration (vHPSD) ablation in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking.

METHODS

Retrospective observational single-center study. The data of 66 consecutive ACHD patients (mean age 60 ± 12.8 years, 46% male) with mild (69.7%), moderate (22.7%), or complex (7.6%) congenital heart disease (CHD) who underwent ablation for paroxysmal (40.9%) or persistent AF (59.1%) were analyzed. Circumferential PVI was performed in all patients and additional substrate ablation in 79,4% of persistent AF patients using irrigated RF energy with vHPSD settings of 70 W/5-7 s or 60 W/7-10 s.

RESULTS

Mean procedure time was 123.6 ± 42 min with a mean RF time of 18.19 ± 10 min. No technique related adverse events occurred. Vascular access complications were detected in seven patients (10.6%) requiring intervention in four patients (6%). A median follow-up time of 491 days (IQR: 194-1054 days). Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) at 1 year was present in 58% of patients (77.8% with paroxysmal AF, 43.6% with persistent AF).

CONCLUSION

vHPSD for ablation of paroxysmal or persistent AF in ACHD patients is safe and effective. Regardless of CHD complexity, no vHPSD ablation modality related complications occurred. Long-term outcome for paroxysmal AF after one ablation was excellent whereas results for persistent AF were limited.

High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Application for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The POWER-FAST III Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal radiofrequency application (RFa) parameters for safe and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are debated. High-power short-duration (HPSD) has been used as an alternative to conventional power delivery (CPD).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare HPSD 70 W/9-10 s (HPSD-70) with CPD 25-40 W in patients undergoing PVI.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to HPSD-70 or CPD (25-40). The primary outcomes were freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrences and the incidence of esophageal thermal lesions (EDELs) after ablation.

RESULTS

Among 304 patients randomized, 301 remained in the study (median age: 61 years; Q1-Q3: 53-69 years; 72% men): 294 patients (97.7%) underwent ablation, 285 (94.7%) underwent endoscopy, and 290 (98.6%) completed the follow-up. At 12 months, 100 patients (73.5%) in the CPD (25-40) group and 87 patients (67%) in the HPSD-70 group were free from recurrences off antiarrhythmic drugs (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.82-1.99; P = 0.28). The incidences of EDELs were 2.7% in the CPD (25-40) group and 3.6% in the HPSD-70 group (P = 0.94). Median left atrial dwell (153 vs 137 min; P = 0.03) and total RF times for definitive PVI (31 vs 11.2 min; P < 0.001) were shorter with HPSD-70 ablation. Four symptomatic embolic events (2 strokes, 1 transient ischemic attack, and 1 splenic infarct) occurred with HPSD-70 and none with CPD (25-40) RFa (P = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD-70 RFa was noninferior to prevent arrhythmia recurrences, and the incidence of EDELs was similar compared with CPD (25-40) RFa. The embolic events were numerically higher in the HPSD-70 group. (High Radiofrequency Power for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Vein Ablation Trial [POWER FAST III]; NCT04153747).

Significance of the local largest bipolar voltage for the optimized ablation strategy using very high-power short duration mode

PURPOSE

Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation creates shallower lesions, potentially reducing efficacy. This study aims to identify factors leading to insufficient lesions during pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) with vHPSD-ablation and to develop an optimized PVAI strategy using this technology.

METHODS

PVAI was performed on 41 atrial fibrillation patients using vHPSD-ablation (90 W/4 s). Lesion parameters were recorded and analyzed to identify predictors of insufficient lesions. An optimized PVAI strategy, based on these predictors, was tested in subsequent 42 patients.

RESULTS

In total, 3099 RF-applications, including 103(3.3%) insufficient lesions, were analyzed. First-pass PVAI was achieved in 19/40(47.5%) right PVs and 24/41(58.5%) left PVs. Multivariate analysis identified significant predictors of insufficient lesions: local largest bipolar voltage (Bi-V), average contact force, baseline impedance, impedance drop, temperature rise, inter-lesion distance (ILD), and anatomical location (carina or not). An ILD:4-6 mm increased the risk of insufficient lesions 2.2-fold, and lesions at the carina increased it 3.6-fold for both ILD < 4 mm and ILD:4-6 mm. Local largest Bi-V was the strongest predictor for insufficient lesions. The optimized PVAI approach, utilizing vHPSD-ablation with an ILD < 4 mm in non-carinal areas with Bi-V < 4 mV, and high-power ablation-index guided ablation (HPAI, 50 W, ablation-index:450-550) in remaining areas, achieved first-pass PVAI in 92.7% of right PVs and 88.1% of left PVs, using vHPSD-ablation in approximately 65% of total RF-applications. The optimized PVAI achieved significantly higher first-pass PVI rate (p < .0001) with shorter ablation time (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate use of vHPSD and HPAI, based on local largest Bi-V and anatomical information, may achieve high first-pass PVAI rates in shorter ablation time with minimal energy delivery.

Early ablation leads to better outcome in patients < 55 years with persistent atrial fibrillation

The question of optimal timing for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to achieve best outcomes remains a crucial clinical issue. As AF occurs less frequently in younger patients, data regarding Diagnosis-to-Ablation Time (DAT) is especially limited in patients under the age of 55 years with persistent AF. We therefore analyzed the temporal relationship between initial AF presentation and timing of catheter ablation in this cohort. We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of patients ≤ 55 years with persistent AF who underwent first-time catheter ablation at our center. The cohort was divided into patients that underwent catheter ablation after diagnosis of persistent AF within a DAT of ≤ 12 months and patients with a DAT of > 12 months. A total of 101 patients (median age 51 years; female n = 19 (18.8%)) with persistent AF were included. Ablation was performed within 12 months ("early DAT") in 51 patients and > 12 months ("late DAT") in 50 patients. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed using high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation. Median DAT was 5 months (1-12 months) in the early ablation group and 36 months (13-240 months) in the late ablation group. The median follow-up was 11.3 months (0.03-37.1 months). The rate of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 30-day blanking period was significantly lower in the early DAT group (13/51 patients; 25.5%) as compared to the late DAT group (26/50 patients; 52.0%) (log rank test; p = 0.003). Catheter ablation performed > 12 months after the initial AF diagnosis was an independent predictor for the occurrence of any atrial arrythmia (OR: 2.58; (95%-CI: 1.32-5.07). Early first-time catheter ablation (DAT ≤ 12 months) in patients ≤ 55 years with persistent AF is associated with a significantly lower rate of arrhythmia recurrence.

First clinical data on artificial intelligence-guided catheter ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Despite advanced ablation strategies and major technological improvements, treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging and the underlying pathophysiology is not fully understood. This study analyzed the multiple procedure outcome and safety of catheter ablation of spatiotemporal dispersions (DISPERS) detected by artificial intelligence (AI)-guided software in patients with long-standing persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Volta VX1 software was used for 50 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF. First, high-density mapping (78% biatrial) with a multipolar mapping catheter was performed. In addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), ablation of DISPERS was performed aiming at homogenizing, dissecting, isolating, or connecting DISPERS areas to nonconducting anatomical structures. Follow-up contained regular visits at our outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months including 7-day Holter electrocardiograms. Patients were mainly suffering from long-standing persistent AF (mean AF duration 50.30 ± 54.28 months). Following PVI, ablation of left atrial and right atrial DISPERS areas led to AF cycle length prolongation (mean of 162.0 ± 16.6 to 202.2 ± 21.6 ms after) and AF termination to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm (SR) in 12 patients (24%). No stroke or pericardial effusion occurred; major groin complications (pseudoaneurysm n = 1, atrioventricular fistula n = 1) were detected in two patients. After a blanking period of 6 weeks, recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia was documented in 26 patients (52%). The majority of patients presented with organized AT (n = 15) while AF was present in n = 9 patients and AT/AF was observed in n = 2 patients. Twenty-two patients underwent reablation. During a mean follow-up of 363.14 ± 187.42 days and after an average of 1.46 ± 0.68 procedures, 82% of patients remained in stable SR.

CONCLUSION

DISPERS-guided ablation using machine learning software (the Volta VX1 software) in addition to PVI in long-standing persistent AF ablation resulted in high long-term success rates regarding AF and AT elimination. Most arrhythmia recurrences were reentrant AT. After a total of 1.46 ± 0.68 procedures, freedom from AF/AT was 82%. Despite prolonged procedure times complication rates were low. Randomized studies are necessary to evaluate long-term efficacy of dispersion-guided ablation using AI.

Myocardial injury and inflammation following pulsed-field ablation and very high-power short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF). To improve PVI efficacy and safety, high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation and pulsed-field ablation (PFA) were recently introduced into clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the extent of myocardial injury and systemic inflammation following PFA, HPSD, and standard RFA using established biomarkers.

METHODS

We included 179 patients with paroxysmal AF receiving first-time PVI with different ablation technologies: standard RFA (30-40 W/20-30 s, n = 52), power-controlled HPSD (70 W/5-7 s, n = 60), temperature-controlled HPSD (90 W/4 s, n = 32), and PFA (biphasic, bipolar waveform, n = 35). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), creatine kinase (CK), CK MB isoform (CK-MB), and white blood cell (WBC) count were determined before and after ablation.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (age 63.1 ± 10.3 years, 61.5% male). Postablation hs-cTnT release was significantly higher with PFA (1469.3 ± 495.0 ng/L), HPSD-70W (1322.3 ± 510.6 ng/L), and HPSD-90W (1441.2 ± 409.9 ng/L) than with standard RFA (1045.9 ± 369.7 ng/L; p < .001). CK and CK-MB release was increased with PFA by 3.4-fold and 5.8-fold, respectively, as compared to standard RFA (p < .001). PFA was associated with the lowest elevation in WBC (Δ1.5 ± 1.5 × 109 /L), as compared to standard RFA (Δ3.8 ± 2.5 × 109 /L, p < .001), HPSD-70W (Δ2.7 ± 1.7 × 109 /L, p = .037), and HPSD-90W (Δ3.6 ± 2.5 × 109 /L, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Among the four investigated ablation technologies, PFA was associated with the highest myocardial injury and the lowest inflammatory reaction.

Comparison of very high-power short-duration, high-power short-duration, and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal power and duration settings for radiofrequency (RF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to improve efficacy and safety is unclear. We compared low-power long-duration (LPLD), high-power short-duration (HPSD), and very HPSD (vHPSD) RF settings for AF ablation.

METHODS

This network meta-analysis (NMA) was structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Observational and randomized studies were included. Eligible studies compared outcomes in AF patients who underwent first-time RF ablation with the following settings: vHPSD (70-90 W, 3-10 s), HPSD (45-60 W, 5-10 s), or LPLD (20-40 W, 20-60 s).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 10,375 patients were included (33% female). Frequentist NMA showed LPLD tended toward a lower odds of freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) versus HPSD (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.00). There was no difference in FFA between vHPSD versus HPSD. Splitwise interval estimates showed a lower odds of FFA in LPLD versus vHPSD on direct (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93) and network estimates (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98). Frequentist NMA showed less total procedural (TP) time with HPSD versus LPLD (generic variance 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.29) and no difference between HPSD versus vHPSD.

CONCLUSION

This NMA shows improved procedural times in HPSD and vHPSD versus LPLD. Although HPSD tended toward improved odds of FFA compared to LPLD, the overall result was not statistically significant. The odds of FFA in LPLD was lower versus vHPSD on direct and network estimates on splitwise interval analysis. Large prospective head-to-head randomized trials are needed to validate HPSD and vHPSD settings.

50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and freedom from atrial arrhythmias while decreasing procedural time. However, the optimal power setting in terms of safety and efficacy has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of 50-W vs 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry (Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) undergoing HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF, either using 50-W or 40-W, were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of any procedural complication at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and the occurrence of transient ischemic attack or stroke at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months was 80.7% in the 50-W group and 77.3% in the 40-W group (Log-rank P = 0.387). The primary safety outcome occurred in 3.7% of patients in the 50-W group vs 2.8% in the 40-W group (P = 0.646). The 50-W group had a higher rate of first-pass PVI (82.3% vs 76.2%; P = 0.040) as well as shorter procedural (67 minutes [IQR: 54-87.5 minutes] vs 93 minutes [IQR: 80.5-111 minutes]; P < 0.001) and radiofrequency ablation times (15 minutes [IQR: 11.4-20 minutes] vs 27 minutes [IQR: 21.5-34.6 minutes]; P < 0.001) than the 40-W group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias or procedural safety outcomes between 50-W and 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF. The use of 50-W was associated with a higher rate of first-pass PVI as well as shorter procedural times.

Optimal interlesion distance for 90 and 50 watt radiofrequency applications with low ablation index values: experimental findings in a chronic ovine model

AIMS

The optimal interlesion distance (ILD) for 90 and 50 W radiofrequency applications with low ablation index (AI) values in the atria has not been established. Excessive ILDs can predispose to interlesion gaps, whereas restrictive ILDs can predispose to procedural complications. The present study sought, therefore, to experimentally determine the optimal ILD for 90 W-4 s and 50 W applications with low AI values to optimize catheter ablation outcomes in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Posterior intercaval lines were created in eight adult sheep using CARTO and the QDOT-MICRO catheter in a temperature-controlled mode. In four animals, the lines were created with 50 W applications, a target AI value ≥350, and ILDs of 6, 5, 4, and 3 mm, respectively. In the other four animals, the lines were created with 90 W-4 s applications and ILDs of 6, 5, 4, and 3 mm, respectively. Activation maps were created immediately after ablation and at 21 days to assess linear block prior to gross and histological analyses. All eight lines appeared transmural and continuous on histology. However, for 50 W-only applications with an ILD of 3 mm resulted in durable linear electrical block, whereas for 90 W applications, only the lines with ILDs of 4 and 3 mm were blocked. No complications were detected during ablation procedures, but all power and ILD combinations except 50 W-6 mm resulted in asymptomatic shallow lung lesions.

CONCLUSION

In the intercaval region in sheep, for 50 W applications with an AI value of ∼370, the optimal ILD is 3 mm, whereas for 90 W-4 s applications, the optimal ILD is 3-4 mm.

Catheter Ablation Approaches for the Treatment of Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients with a Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial arrhythmias, and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation strategies. Significant technological evolution and widespread increase in operator experience have facilitated the effectiveness of catheter ablation to achieve durable PVIs in single or multiple ablation procedures. Nevertheless, arrhythmia recurrence is a common problem even after establishing PVI. Data on catheter ablation in these patients are sparse and repeat ablation in this population is highly challenging. In this review we have summarized the available data as well as potential strategies of catheter ablation following the initial PVI.

Progress in atrial fibrillation ablation during 25 years of Europace journal

The first edition of Europace journal in 1999 came right around the time of the landmark publication of the electrophysiologists from Bordeaux, establishing how elimination of ectopic activity from the pulmonary veins (PVs) resulted in a marked reduction of atrial fibrillation (AF). The past 25 years have seen an incredible surge in scientific interest to develop new catheters and energy sources to optimize durability and safety of ablation, as well as study the mechanisms for AF and devise ablation strategies. While ablation in the beginning was performed with classic 4 mm tip catheters that emitted radiofrequency (RF) energy to create tissue lesions, this evolved to using irrigation and contact force (CF) measurement while increasing power. Also, so-called single-shot devices were developed with balloons and arrays to create larger contiguous lesions, and energy sources changed from RF current to cryogenic ablation and more recently pulsed field ablation with electrical current. Although PV ablation has remained the basis for every AF ablation, it was soon recognized that this was not enough to cure all patients, especially those with non-paroxysmal AF. Standardized approaches for additional ablation targets have been used but have not been satisfactory in all patients so far. This led to highly technical mapping systems that are meant to unravel the drivers for the maintenance of AF. In the following sections, the development of energies, strategies, and tools is described with a focus on the contribution of Europace to publish the outcomes of studies that were done during the past 25 years.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using FireMagic TrueForce ablation catheter: The TRUEFORCE trial

BACKGROUND

The use of contact force (CF) sensing catheters has provided a revolutionary improvement in catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the past decade. However, the success rate of CA for AF remains limited, and some complications still occur.

METHODS

The TRUEFORCE trial (Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation using FireMagic TrueForce Ablation Catheter) is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm objective performance criteria study of AF patients who underwent their first CA procedure using FireMagic TrueForce ablation catheter.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients (118 with paroxysmal AF) were included in this study, and 112 patients included in the per-protocol analysis. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in 100% of the patients, with procedure and fluoroscopy time of 146.63 ± 40.51 min and 12.89 ± 5.59 min, respectively. Freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia after ablation was present 81.25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.78%-88.00%) of patients. No severe adverse events (death, stroke/transient ischemic attack [TIA], esophageal fistula, myocardial infarction, thromboembolism, or pulmonary vein stenosis) were detected during the follow-up. Four (4/115, 3.33%) adverse events were documented, including one abdominal discomfort, one femoral artery hematoma, one coughing up blood, and one postoperative palpitation and insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the clinical feasibility of FireMagic force-sensing ablation catheter in CA of AF, with a satisfactory short- and long-term efficacy and safety.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: anticipating and avoiding complications

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is being performed more frequently and more widely at more centers. This stems from several factors including 1) demographic forces leading to an increased prevalence of the arrhythmia; 2) greater availability of ambulatory monitoring making diagnosis more frequent; 3) relative inefficacy of medications; and 4) improved safety and efficacy of the procedure. Ablation has become much more streamlined and reproducible than a decade ago, but life-threatening complications may still arise.

AREAS COVERED

This review will focus on awareness, avoidance, and early recognition and management of complications of AF ablation. This literature review is challenged by differing approaches to ablation of AF both within a center and between centers, the rapid improvement of technology making the outcomes associated with a therapeutic strategy begun a few years prior relatively obsolete, as well as the heterogeneity of the population being studied.

EXPERT OPINION

Newer technologies are on the horizon which will allow us to ablate AF with increasing efficacy, efficiency, and hopefully safety. Such new technology and changing usage mandate vigilance to avoid complications.