Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Updates in the management of atrial fibrillation: Emerging therapies and treatment

OBJECTIVE

The most common and clinically important cardiac arrhythmia is atrial fibrillation (AF), which has a large negative impact on public health due to higher fatalities, morbidity, and healthcare expenditure rates. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and outcomes of various treatment approaches and interventions for AF.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHOD

The most pertinent published research (original papers and reviews) in the scientific literature were searched for and critically assessed using the online, internationally indexed databases PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Reviews. These studies are summarised in this review. Keywords like "Atrial Fibrillation", "emerging therapies", "treatment", "catheter ablation", and "atrial appendage" were used to search the papers. The papers were researched and examined to be relevant to the topic.

CONCLUSION

A lot of work has gone into enhancing AF management to deal with this expanding public health concern. Significant developments and advances in the treatment of AF during the past few years have aided clinicians in giving AF patients better care. The most recent treatments for AF include medication, catheter ablation, cryo-balloon ablation, and left atrial appendage closure.

Atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: An update on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system pathway blockade as a therapeutic and prevention target

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are two cardiovascular (CV) entities that affect millions of individuals worldwide and their prevalence is translated into a significant impact on health care systems. The common pathophysiological pathways that these two share have created an important clinical interrelation, as the coexistence of HF and AF is associated with worse prognosis and treatment challenges. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), a critical mechanism in blood pressure (BP) control, was proved to be involved in the pathogenesis of both conditions contributing to their further coexistence. Successful control of BP is of great importance to the management of HF, crucial for the prevention of arrhythmiogenic substrates, while RAAS antagonists may possibly affect the development of new-onset AF as well. There are numerous studies that evaluated the effectiveness of RAAS blockade in AF/HF population and despite comparable or modest results, there is a well-established suggestion that RAAS blockers may contribute to a reduction of HF, CV events and recurrence of AF, along with their potential effective role in the new-onset AF prophylaxis. Angiotensin receptor blockers, according to the evidence, are more effective in that direction, followed by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, whereas the data on aldosterone antagonists are not encouraging, yet do have the potential of significant CV disease modificators regardless of their effects on BP.

Contribution of the ACE (rs1799752) and CYP11B2 (rs1799998) Gene Polymorphisms to Atrial Fibrillation in the Tunisian Population

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the association of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE I/D) and aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2-344C/T) gene polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Tunisian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population included 120 patients with AF and 123 age-matched controls. Genotyping of the I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and the -344C/T polymorphism in the CYP11B2 gene was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-RFLP methods, respectively.

RESULTS

The genotype distribution of the ACE I/D and CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphisms was significantly different between AF patients and control participants (p < 0.01 and p < 0.006 respectively). In addition, ACE I/D increased the risk of AF significantly by 3.41-fold for the DD genotype (OR = 3.41; 95% CI [1.39-8.34]; p < 0.007), and after adjusting for confounding factors (age, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia), the risk was higher (OR = 5.71; 95% CI [1.48-21.98]; p < 0.01). Likewise, the CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphism increased the incidence of AF for the TT genotype (OR = 3.66; 95% CI [1.62-8.27]; p < 0.002) and the CT genotype (OR = 2.68; 95% CI [1.22-5.86]; p < 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors (age, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia), the risk remained higher for the TT genotype (OR = 3.58; 95% CI [1.08-11.77]; p < 0.03). Furthermore, the haplotype-based association of the ACE I/D and CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphisms showed that the D-T haplotype increased the risk for AF.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests a significant association of the ACE (I/D) and CYP11B2-344C/T polymorphisms with AF in the Tunisian population.

Atrial flutter/fibrillation in patients receiving transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Atrial flutter/fibrillation (AFL/Af) is a common late complication in atrial septal defect (ASD) patients even after occluder implantation. We try to delineate the risk factors of persistent AFL/Af.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2010, all patients older than 18 years of age who received ASD occluder implantation in our hospital were enrolled, and their records were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms including angiotensinogen gene, A1166C polymorphism on the angiotensin II type I receptor gene, and insertion/deletion (I/D) patterns on the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene were checked using direct sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 517 patients (male/female 127/390) were enrolled. The mean age of patients receiving occluder deployment was 41.5 ± 14.5 years. Prior to occluder deployment, 3.9% of patients had persistent Af, 3.1% of patients had paroxysmal Af, and 0.8% had AFL. After a follow-up of 1894 patient-years, 3.5% had persistent Af and 1.9% of patients had paroxysmal Af. The greatest risk factors of AFL/Af genesis included age, occluder size, presence of multiple ASDs, and underlying thyroid or mitral valve disorder (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.033, p = 0.016, and p = 0.012, respectively). Preoperative AFL/Af status is the most important factor in determining AFL/Af resolution and progression after an intervention. The renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms had no association with AFL/Af genesis, and progression or resolution after intervention.

CONCLUSION

AFL/Af is common after ASD occluder implantation, and predisposed by older age, larger and multiple ASDs, and underlying disorders. Preoperative atrial arrhythmia status is the most important predictor of AFL/Af progression or resolution. Renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms had no association with AFL/Af.

Understanding and Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is on the rise due to the increased rate of related comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Patients with CKD are at higher risk of cardiovascular events and atrial fibrillation is more common in this patient population. It is estimated that the prevalence of chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with CKD is two to three times higher than general population. Furthermore, patients with CKD are less likely to stay in sinus rhythm. Atrial fibrillation presents a major burden in this population due to difficult treatment decisions in the setting of a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials. Patients with CKD have higher risk of stroke with more than half having a CHADS2 score ≥ 2. Anticoagulation have been shown to significantly decrease embolic stroke risk, however bleeding complications such as hemorrhagic stroke is twofold higher with warfarin. Although newer novel anticoagulation drugs have shown promise with lower intracranial hemorrhage risk in comparison to warfarin, lack clinical trial data in CKD and the unavailability of an antidote remains an issue. In this review, we discuss the treatment options available including anticoagulation and the evidence behind them in patients with chronic kidney disease suffering from atrial fibrillation.

Polymorphisms of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system gene in chinese han patients with nonfamilial atrial fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation(AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the adult population. The activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) has been reported to play an important role in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between nonfamilial AF and polymorphisms in RAS gene.

Methods

A total of 931 patients with nonfamilial AF, 663 non-AF heart disease patients and 727 healthy subjects were selected. 10 tagSNPs (tSNPs) (ACE gene rs8066114, AGT gene rs7539020, rs3789678, rs2478544, rs11568023, rs2478523, rs4762, rs699 and CYP11B2 rs3802230, rs3097) were chosen and genotyped in our study. Single-locus analysis and haplotype analysis were used in this study.

Results

In single-locus analysis, we found rs11568023 and rs3789678 in AGT gene were associated with nonfamilial AF in Chinese Han population. AF risk was associated with rs3789678 between the AF group and control groups. Under dominant model, the significant AF risk was observed in rs3789678 between the AF group and non AF heart control group; And the protective effect was found in rs11568023, compared with the non-AF heart disease control group. In multilocus haplotype analysis, the association between frequencies of the haplotypes and AF risk was showed in AGT gene (rs7539020-rs3789678), compared ‘TT’ haplotype with the common ‘TC’ haplotype, adjusted for age, gender, LVEF, LVEDD, LAD and frequency of hypertension and diabetes. The diplotype with ‘TC’, carrying rs3789678-C-allele, was associated with reduced risk of AF between the AF group and the healthy control group. The diplotype with ‘TT’ haplotype in the same block, carrying rs3789678-T-allele, was associated with increased risk of AF.

Conclusions

Via a large-scale case-control study, we found that rs3789678 site was potential susceptible locus of AF whereas rs11568023 was protective factor.

Association of insertion/deletion polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene among Malay male hypertensive subjects in response to ACE inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Several studies show that the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with hypertension in various populations. The present study sought to determine the association of the I/D gene polymorphism among Malay male essential hypertensive subjects in response to ACE inhibitors (enalapril and lisinopril).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 72 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension and 72 healthy subjects were recruited in this study. Blood pressure was recorded from 0 to 24 weeks of treatment with enalapril or lisinopril. Genotyping of the I/D polymorphism was carried out using a standard PCR method.

RESULTS

Statistically significant association of the D allele of the ACE gene was observed between the case and control subjects (p < 0.01). There was a decrease in blood pressure in the patients carrying the DD genotype (SBP=18.5±8.1 mmHg, DBP=15.29±7.1 mmHg) rather than the ID (SBP=4.1±3.3 mmHg, DBP=9.1±3.5 mmHg) and II genotypes (SBP= 3.0±0.2 mmHg, DBP 0.11±6.1 mmHg) of the ACE gene.

CONCLUSION

Patients carrying the DD genotype had higher blood pressure-lowering response when treated with ACE inhibitors enalapril or lisinopril than those carrying ID and II genotypes, suggesting that the D allele may be a possible genetic marker for essential hypertension among Malay male subjects.

The Role Of Renin Angiotensin System In Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and its incidence is on the rise. AF causes significant morbidity and mortality leading to rising AF-related health care costs. There is experimental and clinical evidence from animal and human studies that suggests a role for the renin angiotensin system (RAS) in the etiopathogenesis of AF. This review appraises the current understanding of RAS antagonism, using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and aldosterone antagonists (AA), for prevention of AF. RAS antagonism has proven to be effective for primary and secondary prevention of AF in subjects with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.However, most of the evidence for the protective effect of RAS antagonism is from clinical trials that had AF as a secondary outcome or from unspecified post-hoc analyses. The evidence for prevention in subjects without heart failure and with normal LV function is not as clear. RAS antagonism, in the absence of concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy, was not shown to reduce post cardioversion AF recurrences. RAS antagonism in subjects undergoing catheter ablation has also been ineffective in preventing AF recurrences.

AT1 mutations and risk of atrial fibrillation based on genotypes from 71,000 individuals from the general population

AIMS

Activation of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1 ) receptor has been shown to mediate the structural and electrical remodelling of the atrial myocardium associated with atrial fibrillation. We hypothesized that AT1 genotypic variation is associated with atrial fibrillation or diseases predisposing to atrial fibrillation, such as hypertension, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction, in the general population.

METHODS

We resequenced the AT1 gene in 760 individuals with atrial fibrillation and identified two nonsynonymous variants (I103T and A244S), which were subsequently genotyped in the prospective Copenhagen City Heart Study (n = 10 603) and the prospective Copenhagen General Population Study (n = 60 647).

RESULTS

Risk of atrial fibrillation for heterozygotes for AT1 genetic variants A244S and I103T/A244S vs. noncarriers was increased by 2.7-fold (95% confidence interval 1.5- to 5.1-fold) and 2.6-fold (95% confidence interval 1.6- to 4.2-fold), respectively, for men.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterozygosity for the nonsynonymous AT1 genetic variants A244S and I103T/A244S was associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation in men. The AT1 recptor might be a target for the pharmaceutical industry. This finding needs to be validated in independent studies.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene 2350 G/A polymorphism and susceptibility to atrial fibrillation in Han Chinese patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The angiotensin-converting enzyme gene is one of the most studied candidate genes related to atrial fibrillation. Among the polymorphisms of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene, the 2350 G/A polymorphism (rs4343) is known to have the most significant effects on the plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme concentration. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2350 G/A polymorphism with atrial fibrillation in Han Chinese patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 169 hypertensive patients were eligible for this study. Patients with atrial fibrillation (n = 75) were allocated to the atrial fibrillation group, and 94 subjects without atrial fibrillation were allocated to the control group. The PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism technique was used to assess the genotype frequencies.

RESULTS

The distributions of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2350 G/A genotypes (GG, GA, and AA, respectively) were 40.43%, 41.49%, and 18.08% in the controls and 18.67%, 46.67%, and 34.66% in the atrial fibrillation subjects (p = 0.037). The frequency of the A allele in the atrial fibrillation group was significantly greater than in the control group (58.00% vs. 38.83%, p = 0.0007). Compared with the wild-type GG genotype, the GA and AA genotypes had an increased risk for atrial fibrillation. Additionally, atrial fibrillation patients with the AA genotype had greater left atrial dimensions than the patients with the GG or GA genotypes (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in this study indicate that the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2350 G/A polymorphism is associated with atrial fibrillation and that the A allele shows an increased risk for atrial fibrillation in Han Chinese patients with essential hypertension.

Association of angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome susceptibility in children: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene contains either an insertion (I) allele or a deletion (D) allele forming three potential genotypes: II, ID and DD. The D allele or DD genotype has been reported to be associated with higher plasma ACE level. An assessment of the association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) susceptibility in children is still controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and the onset of INS.

METHOD

A predefined literature search and selection of eligible relevant studies were performed to collect data from electronic databases, and eligible investigations were synthesized using the meta-analysis method.

RESULTS

Nine investigations were identified for the analysis of association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and INS risk in children, including six in Asians, one study for Caucasians and two for Africans. There was positive association between D allele or DD genotype and INS susceptibility in Asians (OR = 1.75, p = 0.01; OR = 2.01, p = 0.02), but not for Caucasian children and Africans (for Caucasians, D: OR=1.35, p = 0.27, DD: OR = 0.95, p = 0.91; for Africans, D: OR = 1.70, p = 0.56, DD: OR = 1.60, p = 0.73). Furthermore, II homozygous seemed to play a positive role against INS onset for Asians (OR = 0.59, p = 0.02), but the link between II genotype and INS risk was not observed in Caucasian children and Africans (Caucasians: OR = 0.31, p = 0.06; Africans: OR = 0.50, p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

D allele and DD homozygous might become significant genetic molecular markers for INS susceptibility in Asian children, but the association was not observed in Caucasians or Africans. However, the conclusion from our study cannot be sustained and more investigations on larger sample in different populations are required to further clarify the role of D allele or DD homozygous in the onset of INS in difference races.

Genetics of atrial fibrillation and possible implications for ischemic stroke

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia mainly caused by valvular, ischemic, hypertensive, and myopathic heart disease. Atrial fibrillation can occur in families suggesting a genetic background especially in younger subjects. Additionally recent studies have identified common genetic variants to be associated with atrial fibrillation in the general population. This cardiac arrhythmia has important public health implications because of its main complications: congestive heart failure and ischemic stroke. Since atrial fibrillation can result in ischemic stroke, one might assume that genetic determinants of this cardiac arrhythmia are also implicated in cerebrovascular disease. Ischemic stroke is a multifactorial, complex disease where multiple environmental and genetic factors interact. Whether genetic variants associated with a risk factor for ischemic stroke also increase the risk of a particular vascular endpoint still needs to be confirmed in many cases. Here we review the current knowledge on the genetic background of atrial fibrillation and the consequences for cerebrovascular disease.

Upstream therapies for management of atrial fibrillation: review of clinical evidence and implications for European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Part I: primary prevention

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is also a progressive disease secondary to continuous structural remodelling of the atria due to AF itself, to changes associated with ageing, and to deterioration of underlying heart disease. Current management aims at preventing the recurrence of AF and its consequences (secondary prevention) and includes risk assessment and prevention of stroke, ventricular rate control, and rhythm control therapies including antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter or surgical ablation. The concept of primary prevention of AF with interventions targeting the development of substrate and modifying risk factors for AF has emerged as a result of recent experiments that suggested novel targets for mechanism-based therapies. Upstream therapy refers to the use of non-antiarrhythmic drugs that modify the atrial substrate- or target-specific mechanisms of AF to prevent the occurrence or recurrence of the arrhythmia. Such agents include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), statins, n-3 (ω-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids, and possibly corticosteroids. Animal experiments have compellingly demonstrated the protective effect of these agents against electrical and structural atrial remodelling in association with AF. The key targets of upstream therapy are structural changes in the atria, such as fibrosis, hypertrophy, inflammation, and oxidative stress, but direct and indirect effects on atrial ion channels, gap junctions, and calcium handling are also applied. Although there have been no formal randomized controlled studies (RCTs) in the primary prevention setting, retrospective analyses and reports from the studies in which AF was a pre-specified secondary endpoint have shown a sustained reduction in new-onset AF with ACEIs and ARBs in patients with significant underlying heart disease (e.g. left ventricular dysfunction and hypertrophy), and in the incidence of AF after cardiac surgery in patients treated with statins. In the secondary prevention setting, the results with upstream therapies are significantly less encouraging. Although the results of hypothesis-generating small clinical studies or retrospective analyses in selected patient categories have been positive, larger prospective RCTs have yielded controversial, mostly negative, results. Notably, the controversy exists on whether upstream therapy may impact mortality and major non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with AF. This has been addressed in retrospective analyses and large prospective RCTs, but the results remain inconclusive pending further reports. This review provides a contemporary evidence-based insight into the role of upstream therapies in primary (Part I) and secondary (Part II) prevention of AF.