Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm2 of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (n = 170) or the PVI-alone group (n = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53-68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42-57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.

Left atrial remodeling and voltage-guided ablation outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation patients over 75 years of age

Background

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age. The improvement in ablation techniques has widened the indications, particularly in elderly patients. Data on LA remodeling and low-voltage zone (LVZ) extent in this subgroup are scarce.

Objective

We assessed the left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage, LVZ extent, and efficacy of voltage-guided ablation in a cohort of patients with persistent AF according to age.

Methods

Three hundred fifty-three patients with persistent AF undergoing a first voltage-guided ablation procedure were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: those <75 years of age (n=286) and those ≥75 years of age (n=67). LA voltage maps were obtained in sinus rhythm. LVZ was defined as <0.5 mV. A propensity score-matching analysis was used to assess the impact of age on LA remodeling.

Results

The LA bipolar voltage was lower (P<.01) in elderly patients. LVZs were found in 67% of elderly patients and 30% of younger patients (P<.01), especially in mild (P<.01) and moderate (P<.01) LVZs. After propensity score matching, these differences were no longer noticeable. Pulmonary vein isolation alone was performed in 33% of elderly patients and 70% of patients <75 years of age (P<.01). Female sex (P<.001), age ≥ 75 years (P=.042), estimated glomerular filtration rate (P=.009), and LA volume index (P<.001) were predictive of LVZ presence. After 36 months of follow-up, the AF-free survival rate after a single procedure was similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Patients >75 years of age with persistent AF display increased LA substrate remodeling than do younger patients. LA scar did not seem to negatively affect the results of substrate-guided ablation, and the complication rate was low.

Individually designed ablation of low-voltage areas in persistent atrial fibrillation-a randomized controlled trial (IDEAL-AF): study design and rationale

Aims

Voltage-based ablation is a promising catheter ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) in which low-voltage zones (LVZs) are targeted as a complement to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In a randomized setting, we intend to investigate whether PVI plus ablation of LVZs, compared to PVI-only, decreases the incidence of arrhythmia recurrence and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with persistent AF and LVZs.

Methods and results

Individually designed ablation of low-voltage areas in persistent atrial fibrillation trial (IDEAL-AF; NCT04377594) is a multi-centre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients with persistent AF and LVZs ≥ 3.0 cm² outside the PVI ablation lines will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI or PVI plus LVZ ablation. The primary outcome will be the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias off anti-arrhythmic drugs during 12 months of follow-up after one to two ablation procedures within 6 months. A 3-month blanking period will be applied after the first procedure. Patients will be monitored using a smart phone-based ECG recording device throughout the follow-up period. With an anticipated enrolment of 936 patients, this study has 80% power to detect a 20% absolute risk reduction in the primary endpoint. Additionally, HRQoL improvement will be assessed using three questionnaires.

Conclusion

IDEAL-AF is a multi-centre, randomized, controlled clinical trial investigating whether ablation of LVZs in addition to PVI reduces the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias and improves HRQoL compared to PVI-only in patients with persistent AF and LVZs. This study has the potential to modify recommendations regarding ablation techniques for this specific patient cohort.

Which ablation strategy is the most effective for treating persistent atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

There is no consensus on the most efficient ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the effectiveness of different ablation strategies for PerAF. The primary efficacy outcome was the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a single ablation procedure during the follow-up period. The primary safety outcome of interest was any reported complication related to the procedure. The secondary outcome was the procedure time. Fifty-two studies with 9048 patients were included in this NMA. The studies were conducted between 2004 and 2024, and 22 different ablation strategies were identified. Pulmonary vein isolation + posterior wall box isolation + extra-pulmonary vein isolation was the most effective ablation therapy for PerAF. Most additional substrate modification ablation strategies do not show significant additional benefits. There were no significant differences in the incidence of procedure-related complications between the different ablation strategies. Pulmonary vein isolation combined with additional ablation sites increases the duration of the procedure.

Effects of atrial fibrillation ablation on arrhythmia burden and ventricular function in end-stage heart failure: Lessons from CASTLE-HTx

AIMS

The CASTLE-HTx trial showed the benefit of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation compared to medical therapy in decreasing mortality, need for left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation (HTx) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Herein we describe the effects of catheter ablation on AF burden, arrhythmia recurrences, and ventricular function in end-stage HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CASTLE-HTx protocol randomized 194 patients in end-stage HF with AF to catheter ablation and medical therapy or medical therapy alone. AF burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and type of AF were assessed at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Overall, 97 patients received ablation; 66 patients (68%) underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and 31 patients (32%) were treated with PVI and additional ablation. Electroanatomic mapping showed the extent of left atrial low voltage (cardiomyopathy) >10% in 31 (31.9%) patients. At 12 months post-ablation, persistent AF was present in 31/89 patients (34.8%), which was significantly less frequent compared to baseline (p = 0.0001). Median AF burden reduction was 36.3 (interquartile range 13.6-63.3) percentage points at 12 months and LVEF improved from 29.2 ± 6.2% to 39.1 ± 8.3% (p < 0.001) following ablation. AF burden reduction <50% was significantly associated with LVEF improvement ≥5% at 12 months after ablation (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation ablation in end-stage HF leads to a substantial decrease in AF burden, a regression from persistent to paroxysmal AF and notably improved LVEF. Favourable ablation outcomes were observed in patients regardless of the presence or absence of signs indicating left atrial cardiomyopathy.

Left Atrial Low-Voltage Zone Assessment and Voltage-Guided Ablation Outcome in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Induced Tachycardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) undergoing catheter ablation have similar or even better outcomes than patients without TIC. Data regarding atrial substrate remodeling are scarce in cases of TIC. We assessed regional distribution of left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage, the extent of low-voltage zones (LVZs), and outcomes of voltage-guided ablation in AF patients with and without TIC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In all, 139 patients with persistent AF presenting for a first voltage-guided catheter ablation were enrolled, 61 with TIC and 78 with structurally normal hearts. LA voltage maps were obtained using a 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system in sinus rhythm. LVZ was defined as <0.5 mV. Compared with non-TIC patients, TIC patients had a lower indexed LA volume (median [interquartile range] 58.6 [50.6-68.7] vs. 63.4 [60.1-76.1] mL/m2; P<0.01) and higher LA voltage (2.3 [1.5-2.8] vs. 1.7 [1-2.6] mV; P=0.02). LVZs were less frequently found in patients with than without TIC (8 [13.1%] vs. 30 [39%]; P<0.01). There was no significant difference in atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT)-free survival rate over a 36-month follow-up between the 2 groups (log-rank test, P=0.176). No predictor of AT recurrence was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

TIC patients exhibit less LA substrate remodeling with a smaller LA volume, higher bipolar voltage, and fewer LVZs than non-TIC patients. They have a similar favorable outcome after a single procedure.

Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Sex inequality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to cardiovascular disease has been observed. This study examined the proportion of women enrolled in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation RCTs and the potential risks of underrepresentation of women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for AF ablation RCTs published from 2015 to 2022. Participant characteristics were compared among trials with higher and lower proportions of women. Of 147 AF ablation RCTs (30,055 participants), only 10 trials had enrolled women ≥50% of the total participants. Additionally, 42 trials (28.57%) excluded pregnant/breastfeeding women; 6 (4.1%) excluded reproductive-age women without reliable birth control. The proportion of women in AF RCTs ranged from 9% to 71% (median 31.5%), whereas the median proportion of men was 67.7%. The rate of women included in the trials was stable from 2015 to 2022 (P=0.49). Study characteristics, including funding source, showed no correlation with the rate of inclusion of women. RCTs with a higher proportion of female participants enrolled older patients with AF, had a higher prevalence of hypertension but less persistent AF, and smaller left atrium size (P<0.05 for all). Biological sex was evaluated as a risk factor or in a subgroup analysis in 28 RCTs; 10.7% of these trials observed the implication of sex on their results.

CONCLUSION

Women were underrepresented in contemporary AF ablation RCTs. Additionally, women enrolled in AF RCTs were likely to have more comorbidities but less advanced AF, limiting the applicability of the results to women with AF.

Integrated Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The global incidence of atrial fibrillation is on the rise. Atrial fibrillation, a complex disease, heightens the likelihood of heart failure, stroke, and mortality, necessitating careful attention. Controlling heart rate and rhythm, addressing risk factors, and preventing strokes are fundamental in treating atrial fibrillation. Catheter ablation stands out as the primary approach for atrial fibrillation rhythm control. Nevertheless, the limited success rates pose a significant challenge to catheter ablation, particularly for persistent atrial fibrillation. Various adjunctive ablation techniques are currently under investigation to enhance the effectiveness of catheter ablation. This review provides an overview of the current state of the art and the latest optimized treatments for persistent atrial fibrillation in the areas of rhythm control, heart rate control, and risk factor management.

Ablation Strategies for Repeat Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences Despite Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The Prospective Randomized ASTRO AF Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

Ablation strategies for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and isolated pulmonary veins vary and their effects on arrhythmia recurrence remain unclear. A prospective randomized German multicenter trial sought to compare 2 ablation strategies in this patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation despite durable pulmonary vein isolation were randomly assigned at 7 centers to undergo low-voltage area ablation using 3-dimensional mapping and irrigated radiofrequency current ablation (group A) or empirical left atrial appendage isolation (LAAI) using the cryoballoon followed by staged interventional left atrial appendage closure (group B). The primary end point was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between 91 and 365 days after index ablation. The study was powered for superiority of LAAI compared with low-voltage area.

RESULTS

Patients (40% women; mean age, 68.8±8 years) with paroxysmal (32%) or persistent atrial fibrillation (68%) were randomized to undergo low-voltage area ablation (n=79) or cryoballoon-guided LAAI (n=82). After a planned interim analysis, enrollment was halted for futility on January 10, 2023. In the LAAI group, 77 of 82 left atrial appendages were successfully isolated with subsequent left atrial appendage closure in 57 patients. Procedure-related complications occurred in 4 (5%) and 11 (13.5%) patients in group A and B, respectively (P=0.10). The median follow-up was 367 days (interquartile range, 359-378). The Kaplan-Meier point estimate for freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias was 51.7% (CI, 40.9%-65.4%) for group A and 55.5% (CI, 44.4%-69.2%; P=0.8069) for group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study did not detect superiority of cryoballoon-guided LAAI over low-voltage area ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation despite durable PVI.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04056390.

[Initial ablation of atrial fibrillation-Is pulmonary vein isolation sufficient? : Pro and contra]

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is currently the gold standard for the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although this procedure shows good success rates, the recurrence rates after PVI alone are significantly higher in advanced AF and in the presence of comorbidities. Therefore, it is important to consider additional arrhythmogenic mechanisms outside the pulmonary veins, depending on the individual case, in order to improve the patients' outcome.

Left atrial spatial entropy: a novel tool for electrophysiological substrate characterization in atrial fibrillation

Background

Electrical remodeling has been linked to the progression and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA). Substrate mapping based solely on a voltage amplitude electrogram (EGM) does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the left atrial (LA) disease. The aim of this study is to assess left atrial spatial entropy (LASE) from voltage maps routinely obtained during AF ablation to further characterize the LA substrate.

Materials and Methods

High-density electroanatomic maps (EAMs) of 27 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing routine CA were prospectively collected. Computational post-processing was performed on the voltage maps. Using the Shannon entropy model, the probability distribution of the amplitude range values associated with each point of the map was used to measure LASE. Finally, correlations between LASE and clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of AF were explored.

Results

LASE differentiated between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF (6.45 ± 0.41 vs. 5.87 ± 0.53; p = 0.028) and patients with normal and abnormal LA substrate (6.42 ± 0.42 vs. 5.87 ± 0.56; p = 0.043), independent of the basal rhythm during EM acquisition (6.33 ± 0.41 vs. 6.11 ± 0.63; p = 0.619). Accordance between LASE and EAMs was assessed by ROC analysis (AUC: 0.81; C.I.: 0.62-0.99; Youden index: 6.06; sensitivity: 80%; and specificity: 80%). Patients with the lowest LASE reported AF recurrence at the follow-up.

Conclusion

LASE may play a role in the further characterization of the LA substrate and the type of AF, independent of basal rhythm.

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). Methods: Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patients with AF were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 22 April 2024. Primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the first AF ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and procedure-related complication rate. Sensitivity analysis including only patients with LVA demonstration at mapping and multiple subgroups analyses were also performed. Results: 1547 patients from 7 studies were included. LVA ablation in addition to PVI reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.81, p < 0.001) with a number needed to treat to prevent recurrence of 10. No difference in procedure time (mean difference [MD] -5.32 min, 95% CI -19.01-8.46 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (MD -1.10 min, 95% CI -2.48-0.28 min, p = 0.12) and complication rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.61, p = 0.54) was observed. Consistent results were demonstrated when considering only patients with LVA during mapping and in prespecified subgroups for AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent), multicentric vs. monocentric trial, and ablation strategy in control group. Conclusions: In patients with AF, ablation of LVAs in addition to PVI reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence without a significant increase in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or complication rate.

Association between P-wave terminal force in lead V1 and extent of left atrial low-voltage substrate in older patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The P-wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) is a marker of cardiomyopathy and risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Low-voltage area (LVA) in the left atrium (LA), which indicates underlying atrial fibrosis, could predict AF recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between PTFV1 and LVA in older patients with paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

From May 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021, a total of 162 patients aged 65-80 years with paroxysmal AF who underwent index ablation procedures were enrolled. PTFV1 was measured in sinus rhythm (SR) using 12-lead electrocardiograms prior to the ablation. Abnormal PTFV1 was defined as a ≥ 4 mVms depression. Additional LVA ablation beyond circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) was performed if LVAs were found.

RESULTS

Among the 162 patients, 88 had a normal PTFV1 and 74 had an abnormal PTFV1 prior to ablation. There was a significant difference in LVA in patients with and without an abnormal PTFV1 (LVA, 11.0 vs. 5.1 cm2, P < 0.001; LVA burden, 8.9% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). PTFV1 and PTAV1 were highest in the upper tertile with extensive LVAs (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that abnormal PTFV1 was an independent predictor of LVAs (β = 4.961; 95% CI, 2.135-7.788; P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 23 months, the AF-free survival rate was similar between the normal PTFV1 group and the abnormal PTFV1 group (13/88 vs. 12/74, hazard ratio [HR], 0.933 [95% CI, 0.425-2.047]; P = 0.861).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal PTFV1 at baseline was independently associated with the extent of LVA in older patients with paroxysmal AF.

Adjunctive low-voltage area ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of adjunctive low-voltage area (LVA) ablation on outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA with versus without LVA ablation for patients with AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. Our primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), including AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia. We used R version 4.3.1 for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 10 RCTs encompassing 1780 patients, of whom 890 (50%) were randomized to LVA ablation. Adjunctive LVA ablation significantly reduced recurrence of ATA (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.88; p < .01) and reduced the number of redo ablation procedures (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.85; p < .01), as compared with conventional ablation. Among 691 (43%) patients with documented LVAs on baseline substrate mapping, adjunctive LVA ablation substantially reduced ATA recurrences (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.86; p < .01). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of periprocedural adverse events (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.39-1.56; p = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive LVA ablation is an effective and safe strategy for reducing recurrences of ATA among patients who undergo CA for AF.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Comparison of voltages between atria: differences in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Ultra high-density mapping systems allow for comparison of atrial electroanatomical maps in unprecedented detail. Atrial scar determined by voltages and surface area between atria, rhythm and atrial fibrillation (AF) types was assessed.

METHODS

Left (LA) and right atrial (RA) maps were created using Rhythmia HDx in patients listed for ablation for paroxysmal (PAF, sinus rhythm (SR) maps only) or persistent AF (PeAF, AF and SR maps). Electrograms on corresponding SR/AF maps were paired for direct comparison. Percentage surface area of scar was assigned low- (LVM, ≤ 0.05 mV), intermediate- (IVM, 0.05-0.5 mV) or normal voltage myocardium, (NVM, > 0.5 mV).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were recruited generating 96 maps using 913,480 electrograms. Paired SR-AF bipolar electrograms showed fair correlation in LA (Spearman's ρ = 0.32) and weak correlation in RA (ρ = 0.19) and were significantly higher in SR in both (LA: 0.61 mV (0.20-1.67) vs 0.31 mV (0.10-0.74), RA: 0.68 mV (0.19-1.88) vs 0.47 mV (0.14-1.07), p < 0.0005 both). Voltages were significantly higher in patients with PAF over PeAF, (LA: 1.13 mV (0.39-2.93) vs 0.52 mV (0.16-1.49); RA: 0.93 mV (0.24-2.46) vs 0.57 mV (0.17-1.69)). Minimal differences were seen in electrogram voltages between atria. Significantly more IVM/LVM surface areas were seen in AF over SR (LA only, p < 0005), and PeAF over PAF (LA: p = 0.01, RA: p = 0.04). There was minimal difference between atria within patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra high-density mapping shows paired electrograms correlate poorly between SR and AF. SR electrograms are typically (but not always) larger than those in AF. Patients with PeAF have a lower global electrogram voltage than those with PAF. Electrogram voltages are similar between atria within individual patients.

[Development of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias with special consideration of contributions from German engineers and electrophysiologists]

The development and clinical implementation of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia is one of the outstanding achievements of modern cardiovascular treatment. Over a period of less than 40 years, a curative and safe treatment strategy for almost all forms of atrial arrhythmias has been developed and implemented. German electrophysiologists and engineers have made a significant contribution to this truly outstanding success story in modern medicine. Their contributions should be appropriately acknowledged because without them, the development of ablation technology and its worldwide dissemination would not have been possible. Both the technological contributions and the medical-electrophysiological contributions were at the absolute forefront of worldwide developments and have made a significant contribution to the fact that today more than 500,000 patients with symptomatic and/or threatening cardiac arrhythmias can be successfully treated every year by use of catheter ablation. We would like to thank them all for their achievements.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Left atrial total emptying fraction measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts low-voltage areas detected during electroanatomical mapping

AIMS

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) found during left atrial (LA) electroanatomical mapping are increasingly targeted by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) on top of pulmonary vein isolation to improve arrhythmia-free survival in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, pre-procedural prediction of LVAs remains challenging. The purpose of the present study was to describe the association between parameters of LA function and dimensions, respectively, derived from pre-procedural cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and the presence of LVAs on LA voltage mapping.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent first-time RFCA for paroxysmal or persistent AF and who were in stable sinus rhythm during pre-procedural CMR imaging were included in this study. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived parameters of LA function and dimensions were calculated. Low-voltage areas were defined as areas with bipolar voltage amplitudes of ≤0.5 mV on electroanatomical mapping. In total, 259 consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Low-voltage areas were found in 25 of 259 patients (9.7%). Compared with those without LVAs, patients with LVAs were significantly older, were more likely to be female, had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, had larger LA volumes, and had a lower LA total emptying fraction (TEF). In multivariate analysis, only LA TEF [odds ratio (OR) 0.885, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.846-0.926, P < 0.001] and the CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR 1.507, 95% CI 1.115-2.038, P = 0.008) remained independently associated with the presence of LVAs.

CONCLUSION

Left atrial TEF and the CHA2DS2-VASc score were independently associated with the presence of LVAs found during LA electroanatomical mapping. These findings may help to improve pre-procedural prediction of pro-arrhythmogenic LVAs and to improve peri-procedural patient management.

Impact of Posterior Left Atrial Voltage on Ablation Outcomes in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: CAPLA Substudy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). Adjunctive ablation targeting low voltage areas (LVAs) may improve arrhythmia outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the outcomes of adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) to PVI, vs PVI alone in PsAF patients with posterior wall LVAs.

METHODS

The CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) study was a multicenter, randomized trial involving PsAF patients randomized 1:1 to either PVI alone or PVI with PWI. Voltage mapping performed during pacing pre-ablation was reviewed offline, with LVA defined as bipolar voltage of <0.5 mV. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of >30 seconds off antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months after a single ablation procedure in patients with posterior LVA.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients (average 64.6 ± 9.2 years,73.3% males, median atrial fibrillation duration 4.5 months [IQR: 2 to 8 months]) underwent multipolar left atrial mapping during coronary sinus pacing with posterior LVA present in 69 (32.9%). Patients with posterior LVA were more likely to have LVA in other atrial regions (91.7% vs 57.1%; P < 0.01), larger left atrial diameter (4.8 cm vs 4.4 cm; P < 0.01), and significantly increased risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months (LVA: 56.5% vs no LVA: 41.4%; HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.01-2.27; P = 0.04) compared to no posterior LVA. However, the addition of PWI to PVI did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence over PVI alone (PVI with PWI: 44.8% vs PVI: 41.9%; HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.51-1.79; P = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PsAF undergoing catheter ablation, posterior LVA was associated with a significant increase in atrial arrhythmia recurrence. However, the addition of PWI in those with posterior LVA did not reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence over PVI alone.

The role of CT in arrhythmia management-treatment planning and post-procedural imaging surveillance

Several interventional treatment options exist in patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiac CT is routinely performed prior to occlusion of the left atrial appendage, pulmonary vein isolation, and cardiac device implantation. Besides the evaluation of coronary artery disease, cardiac CT provides isotropic, high-resolution CT images of the cardiac anatomy with the possibility of multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional reconstructions which are helpful to guide interventional treatment. In addition, cardiac CT is increasingly used to rapidly evaluate periprocedural complications and for the routine post-procedural imaging surveillance in patients after interventions. This review article will discuss current applications of pre- and post-interventional CT imaging in patients with arrhythmia.

Recurrence as isthmus-related atrial tachycardia: A cautionary point of low-voltage area homogenization of persistent atrial fibrillation

A 66-year-old female underwent persistent atrial fibrillation ablation. After pulmonary vein isolation and homogenization of low-voltage areas (LVAs), atrial tachycardia (AT) was not induced at the first session; however, it recurred one year after the procedure. During the second session, the extensive LVAs were distributed in the same area of the left atrial anterior wall and expanded possibly due to the previous LVA homogenization. The activation map revealed a macroreentrant AT circuit with the critical isthmus between the isolated right superior pulmonary vein and homogenized LVAs. Although the Ripple map algorithm failed to visualize dynamic bars, extremely low voltage and fractionated potentials (amplitude, 0.04 mV) were observed at the isthmus. Currently, there are various procedural endpoints of LVA-guided ablation (e.g. local electrogram reduction > 50 % or <0.1 mV in amplitude). In this case, incomplete transmural lesions may have led to slow conduction, which could have become an AT substrate. In cases with extensive LVAs on the left atrial anterior wall, eliminating any potential channels may be important for preventing future iatrogenic ATs. LVA-guided ablation should be performed on an individual basis, considering the potential benefits and harms based on the extent and location of LVAs.

Learning objective

Currently, the procedural endpoint of low-voltage area (LVA)-guided ablation varies across studies. Because any low-voltage potentials, except scars, can cause slow conduction, LVA-guided ablation with an endpoint of local electrogram voltage reduction can unintentionally generate an iatrogenic slow conduction isthmus. LVA-guided ablation should be individually performed, considering the potential benefits and harms based on the extent and location of LVAs.

Long-Term Impact of Additional Ablation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results From EARNEST-PVI Trial

Background An optimal strategy for left atrial ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results We conducted an extended follow-up of the multicenter randomized controlled EARNEST-PVI (Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which compared 12-month rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF between patients randomized to a PVI-alone strategy (n=248) or PVI-plus strategy (n=248; PVI followed by left atrial additional ablation, including linear ablation or ablation targeting areas with complex fractionated electrograms). The present study extended the follow-up period to 3 years after enrollment. Outcomes were compared not only between randomly allocated groups but also between on-treatment groups categorized by actually created ablation lesions. Recurrence rate of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was lower in the randomly allocated to PVI-plus group than the PVI-alone group (29.0% versus 37.5%, P=0.036). On-treatment analysis revealed that patients with PVI+linear ablation (n=205) demonstrated a lower AF/AT recurrence rate than those with PVI only (26.3% versus 37.8%, P=0.007). In contrast, patients with PVI+complex fractionated electrograms ablation (n=37) had an AF/AT recurrence rate comparable to that of patients with PVI only (40.5% versus 37.8%, P=0.76). At second ablation in 126 patients with AF/AT recurrence, ATs excluding common atrial flutter were more frequent in patients with PVI+linear ablation than in those with PVI only (32.6% versus 5.7%, P<0.0001). Conclusions Left atrial ablation in addition to PVI was efficacious during 3-year follow-up. Linear ablation was superior to other ablation strategies but may increase iatrogenic ATs. Registration URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm; Unique identifier: UMIN000019449.

Efficacy and safety of low voltage area ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the recurrence rate of AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains high. The efficacy and safety of low voltage area (LVA) ablation in the treatment of AF are uncertain.

METHODS

The studies comparing the efficacy and safety of LVA ablation and LVA non-ablation for AF were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. Outcomes of interest included recurrent event, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. Continuous variables were evaluated with mean deviation (MD) and standard mean difference (SMD). Odds ratio (OR) values and its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used in meta-analysis of binary variables.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The AF recurrence was similar between the two groups, with no statistical difference (25.7% (67/346) vs. 28% (63/225), P = 0.49). LVA ablation did not increase the incidence of AT (8.7% (20/231) vs. 14.5% (28/193), P = 0.66). Fluoroscopy time was longer in the LVA ablation group (31.4 ± 8.4 min vs. 26.3 ± 7.8 min, P < 0.05). Complication rates were similar between the two groups (26.6% (17/64) vs. 21.7% (13/60), P = 0.53). Patients with LVA had higher AT/AF recurrence (32.9% (213/647) vs. 24.2% (229/948), P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with left atrial LVA have a poor prognosis after catheter ablation. LVA ablation did not reduce the recurrence of AF nor did it increase the recurrence of atrial tachycardia.

What determines the optimal pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation? Insights from in silico trials in 800 virtual atria

The best pharmacological treatment for each atrial fibrillation (AF) patient is unclear. We aim to exploit AF simulations in 800 virtual atria to identify key patient characteristics that guide the optimal selection of anti-arrhythmic drugs. The virtual cohort considered variability in electrophysiology and low voltage areas (LVA) and was developed and validated against experimental and clinical data from ionic currents to ECG. AF sustained in 494 (62%) atria, with large inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 ) and Na+ /K+ pump (INaK ) densities (IK1 0.11 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 S mF-1 ; INaK 0.68 ± 0.15 vs. 0.38 ± 26 S mF-1 ; sustained vs. un-sustained AF). In severely remodelled left atrium, with LVA extensions of more than 40% in the posterior wall, higher IK1 (median density 0.12 ± 0.02 S mF-1 ) was required for AF maintenance, and rotors localized in healthy right atrium. For lower LVA extensions, rotors could also anchor to LVA, in atria presenting short refractoriness (median L-type Ca2+ current, ICaL , density 0.08 ± 0.03 S mF-1 ). This atrial refractoriness, modulated by ICaL and fast Na+ current (INa ), determined pharmacological treatment success for both small and large LVA. Vernakalant was effective in atria presenting long refractoriness (median ICaL density 0.13 ± 0.05 S mF-1 ). For short refractoriness, atria with high INa (median density 8.92 ± 2.59 S mF-1 ) responded more favourably to amiodarone than flecainide, and the opposite was found in atria with low INa (median density 5.33 ± 1.41 S mF-1 ). In silico drug trials in 800 human atria identify inward currents as critical for optimal stratification of AF patient to pharmacological treatment and, together with the left atrial LVA extension, for accurately phenotyping AF dynamics. KEY POINTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) maintenance is facilitated by small L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL ) and large inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 ) and Na+ /K+ pump. In severely remodelled left atrium, with low voltage areas (LVA) covering more than 40% of the posterior wall, sustained AF requires higher IK1 and rotors localize in healthy right atrium. For lower LVA extensions, rotors can also anchor to LVA, if the atria present short refractoriness (low ICaL ) Vernakalant is effective in atria presenting long refractoriness (high ICaL ). For short refractoriness, atria with fast Na+ current (INa ) up-regulation respond more favourably to amiodarone than flecainide, and the opposite is found in atria with low INa . The inward currents (ICaL and INa ) are critical for optimal stratification of AF patient to pharmacological treatment and, together with the left atrial LVA extension, for accurately phenotyping AF dynamics.

Impact of gender on left atrial low-voltage zones in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: results of a voltage-guided ablation

Background

Gender-related differences have been reported in atrial fibrotic remodeling and prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after ablation. We assessed in persistent AF the regional distribution of left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage and the extent of low-voltage zones (LVZ) according to gender as well as the results of a voltage-guided substrate ablation.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent a voltage-guided AF ablation were enrolled. LA endocardial voltage maps were obtained using a 3D electro-anatomical mapping system in sinus rhythm. LVZ was defined as <0.5 mV.

Results

A total of 115 patients were enrolled (74 men, 41 women). The LA bipolar voltage amplitude was twice lower in the whole LA (p < 0.01) and in each atrial region in women compared with men, whereas the LA indexed volume was similar. LVZ were found in 56.1% of women and 16.2% of men (p < 0.01). LVZ were also more extensive in women (p = 0.01), especially in the anterior LA. Atrial voltage alteration occurred earlier in women than in men. In a multivariate analysis, the female sex (OR 12.99; 95% CI, 3.23-51.63, p = 0.0001) and LA indexed volume (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16, p = 0.001) were predictive of LVZ. Atrial arrhythmia-free survival was similar in men and women 36 months after a single ablation procedure.

Conclusion

The study reports a strong relationship between the female gender and atrial substrate remodeling. The female gender was significantly associated with higher incidence, earlier occurrence, and greater extent of LVZ compared with men. Despite the female-specific characteristics in atrial remodeling, LVZ-guided ablation may improve the AF ablation outcome in women.

Catheter Ablation for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: An Update of the Literature

Catheter ablation has been shown to be more effective at maintaining sinus rhythm and improving quality of life when compared to antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency and cryoablation are two effective methods. However, catheter-only ablation strategies have not consistently produced high success rates in treating longstanding and persistent AF patients. The emerging treatment of choice for such cases is hybrid ablation, which involves a multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach to achieve surgical ablation of the direct posterior left atrial wall in combination with endocardial catheter ablation. Studies have shown promising results for the hybrid approach when compared with catheter ablation alone, but it is not without risks. Large and randomised studies are necessary to further evaluate these strategies for managing AF.

Progress in atrial fibrillation ablation during 25 years of Europace journal

The first edition of Europace journal in 1999 came right around the time of the landmark publication of the electrophysiologists from Bordeaux, establishing how elimination of ectopic activity from the pulmonary veins (PVs) resulted in a marked reduction of atrial fibrillation (AF). The past 25 years have seen an incredible surge in scientific interest to develop new catheters and energy sources to optimize durability and safety of ablation, as well as study the mechanisms for AF and devise ablation strategies. While ablation in the beginning was performed with classic 4 mm tip catheters that emitted radiofrequency (RF) energy to create tissue lesions, this evolved to using irrigation and contact force (CF) measurement while increasing power. Also, so-called single-shot devices were developed with balloons and arrays to create larger contiguous lesions, and energy sources changed from RF current to cryogenic ablation and more recently pulsed field ablation with electrical current. Although PV ablation has remained the basis for every AF ablation, it was soon recognized that this was not enough to cure all patients, especially those with non-paroxysmal AF. Standardized approaches for additional ablation targets have been used but have not been satisfactory in all patients so far. This led to highly technical mapping systems that are meant to unravel the drivers for the maintenance of AF. In the following sections, the development of energies, strategies, and tools is described with a focus on the contribution of Europace to publish the outcomes of studies that were done during the past 25 years.

Baseline left atrial low-voltage area predicts recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: WAVE-MAP AF results

AIMS

Electro-anatomical mapping may be critical to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) subjects who require substrate modification beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective was to determine correlations between pre-ablation mapping characteristics and 12-month outcomes after a single PVI-only catheter ablation of AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study enrolled paroxysmal AF (PAF), early persistent AF (PsAF; 7 days-3 months), and non-early PsAF (>3-12 months) subjects undergoing de novo PVI-only radiofrequency catheter ablation. Sinus rhythm (SR) and AF voltage maps were created with the Advisor HD Grid™ Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™ for each subject, and the presence of low-voltage area (LVA) (low-voltage cutoffs: 0.1-1.5 mV) was investigated. Follow-up visits were at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a 24-h Holter monitor at 12 months. A Cox proportional hazards model identified associations between mapping data and 12-month recurrence after a single PVI procedure. The study enrolled 300 subjects (113 PAF, 86 early PsAF, and 101 non-early PsAF) at 18 centres. At 12 months, 75.5% of subjects were free from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Univariate analysis found that arrhythmia recurrence did not correlate with AF diagnosis, but LVA was significantly correlated. Low-voltage area (<0.5 mV) >28% of the left atrium in SR [hazard ratio (HR): 4.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.08-11.18; P = 0.0003] and >72% in AF (HR: 5.66, 95% CI: 2.34-13.69; P = 0.0001) was associated with a higher risk of AF/AFL/AT recurrence at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Larger extension of LVA was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence. These subjects may benefit from substrate modification beyond PVI.

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The overall success rate of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remains suboptimal, especially in older patients.

Objective

To explore the incremental benefit of low-voltage-area ablation after CPVI in older patients with paroxysmal AF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial was an investigator-initiated trial to compare the efficacy of additional low-voltage-area ablation beyond CPVI vs CPVI alone in older patients with paroxysmal AF. Participants were patients aged 65 to 80 years with paroxysmal AF who were referred for catheter ablation. They were enrolled in 14 tertiary hospitals in China from April 1, 2018, to August 3, 2020, and follow-up occurred through August 15, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to undergo CPVI plus low-voltage-area ablation or CPVI alone. Low-voltage areas were defined as areas with amplitude less than 0.5 mV in more than 3 adjacent points. If low-voltage areas existed, additional substrate ablation was performed in the CPVI plus group but not the CPVI alone group.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point of the study was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia as documented by electrocardiogram during a clinical visit or lasting longer than 30 seconds during Holter recordings occurring after a single ablation procedure.

Results

Among 438 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 70.5 [4.4] years; 219 men [50%]), 24 (5.5%) did not complete the blanking period and were not included for efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 23 months, the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia was significantly lower in the CPVI plus group (31/209 patients, 15%) compared with the CPVI alone group (49/205, 24%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95; P = .03). In subgroup analyses, among all patients with low-voltage area, CPVI plus substrate modification was associated with a 51% decreased risk of ATA recurrence compared with CPVI alone (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that additional low-voltage-area ablation beyond CPVI decreased the ATA recurrence in older patients with paroxysmal AF compared with CPVI alone. Our findings merit further replication by larger trials with longer follow-up.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462628.

Spatial correlation of left atrial low voltage substrate in sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation: The rhythm specificity of atrial low voltage substrate

INTRODUCTION

Improved sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rates have been achieved in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing pulmonary vein isolation plus additional ablation of low voltage substrate (LVS) during SR. However, voltage mapping during SR may be hindered in persistent and long-persistent AF patients by immediate AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion. We assess correlations between LVS extent and location during SR and AF, aiming to identify regional voltage thresholds for rhythm-independent delineation/detection of LVS areas. (1) Identification of voltage dissimilarities between mapping in SR and AF. (2) Identification of regional voltage thresholds that improve cross-rhythm substrate detection. (3) Comparison of LVS between SR and native versus induced AF.

METHODS

Forty-one ablation-naive persistent AF patients underwent high-definition (1 mm electrodes; >1200 left atrial (LA) mapping sites per rhythm) voltage mapping in SR and AF. Global and regional voltage thresholds in AF were identified which best match LVS < 0.5 mV and <1.0 mV in SR. Additionally, the correlation between SR-LVS with induced versus native AF-LVS was assessed.

RESULTS

Substantial voltage differences (median: 0.52, interquartile range: 0.33-0.69, maximum: 1.19 mV) with a predominance of the posterior/inferior LA wall exist between the rhythms. An AF threshold of 0.34 mV for the entire left atrium provides an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 69%, 67%, and 69% to identify SR-LVS < 0.5 mV, respectively. Lower thresholds for the posterior wall (0.27 mV) and inferior wall (0.3 mV) result in higher spatial concordance to SR-LVS (4% and 7% increase). Concordance with SR-LVS was higher for induced AF compared to native AF (area under the curve[AUC]: 0.80 vs. 0.73). AF-LVS < 0.5 mV corresponds to SR-LVS < 0.97 mV (AUC: 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Although the proposed region-specific voltage thresholds during AF improve the consistency of LVS identification as determined during SR, the concordance in LVS between SR and AF remains moderate, with larger LVS detection during AF. Voltage-based substrate ablation should preferentially be performed during SR to limit the amount of ablated atrial myocardium.

Construction and integrated analysis of the ceRNA network hsa_circ_0000672/miR-516a-5p/TRAF6 and its potential function in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrosis is a crucial contributor to initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to identify a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory network related to atrial fibrosis in AF, especially to validate hsa_circ_0000672/hsa_miR-516a-5p/TRAF6 ceRNA axis in AF preliminarily. The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network associated with AF fibrosis was constructed using bioinformatic tools and literature reviews. Left atrium (LA) low voltage was used to represent LA fibrosis by using LA voltage matrix mapping. Ten controls with sinus rhythm (SR), and 20 patients with persistent AF including 12 patients with LA low voltage and 8 patients with LA normal voltage were enrolled in this study. The ceRNA regulatory network associated with atrial fibrosis was successfully constructed, which included up-regulated hsa_circ_0000672 and hsa_circ_0003916, down-regulated miR-516a-5p and five up-regulated hub genes (KRAS, SMAD2, TRAF6, MAPK11 and SMURF1). In addition, according to the results of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, these hub genes were clustered in TGF-beta and MAPK signaling pathway. In the patients with persistent AF, hsa_circ_0000672 expression in peripheral blood monocytes was significantly higher than those in controls with SR by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (p-value < 0.001). Furthermore, hsa_circ_0000672 expression was higher in peripheral blood monocytes of persistent AF patients with LA low voltage than those with LA normal voltage (p-value = 0.002). The dual-luciferase activity assay confirmed that hsa_circ_0000672 exerted biological functions as a sponge of miR-516a-5p to regulate expression of its target gene TRAF6. Hsa_circ_0000672 expression in peripheral blood monocytes may be associated with atrial fibrosis. The hsa_circ_0000672 may be involved in atrial fibrosis by indirectly regulating TRAF6 as a ceRNA by sponging miR-516a-5p.

Amplified sinus-P-wave analysis predicts outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicentre study

Introduction

Outcomes of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. Non-invasive stratification of patients based on the presence of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) could allow to identify the best responders to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods

Observational multicentre retrospective study in patients undergoing cryoballoon-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF. The duration of amplified P-wave (APW) was measured from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram during the procedure. If patients were in AF, direct-current cardioversion was performed to allow APW measurement in sinus rhythm. An APW cut-off of 150 ms was used to identify patients with significant ACM. We assessed freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up in patients with APW ≥ 150 ms vs. APW < 150 ms.

Results

We included 295 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 10.6), of whom 193 (65.4%) suffered from persistent AF and the remaining 102 (34.6%) from long-standing persistent AF. One-hundred-forty-two patients (50.2%) experienced arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up of 793 ± 604 days. Patients with APW ≥ 150 ms had a significantly higher recurrence rate post ablation compared to those with APW < 150 ms (57.0% vs. 41.6%; log-rank p < 0.001). On a multivariable Cox-regression analysis, APW≥150 ms was the only independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence post ablation (HR 2.03 CI95% 1.28-3.21; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

APW duration predicts arrhythmia recurrence post cryoballoon-PVI in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. An APW cut-off of 150 ms allows to identify patients with significant ACM who have worse outcomes post PVI. Analysis of APW represents an easy, non-invasive and highly reproducible diagnostic tool which allows to identify patients who are the most likely to benefit from PVI-only approach.

Randomized evaluation of redo ablation procedures of atrial fibrillation with focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided procedures: the REDO-FIRM study

AIMS

REDO-FIRM evaluated safety and effectiveness of conventional vs. focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided ablation of recurrent persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after an initial AF ablation procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multicentre, randomized study included patients with a single prior AF ablation, but with recurrent AF and reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs). Conventional ablation generally included PV re-isolation; however, additional ablation was permitted per physician discretion. In the FIRM arm, beyond PV re-isolation, basket catheter-based FIRM mapping created dynamic animations of putative rotors, which were targeted for ablation. Between May 2016 and July 2019, 269 subjects were randomized, with 243 subjects completing 12-month follow-up. Ablation beyond re-pulmonary vein isolation, the FIRM vs. Conventional arms did not differ significantly: cavo-tricuspid isthmus -9.0% vs. 15.3%, caval vein isolation -1.5% vs. 0.8%, non-PV trigger -2.2% vs. 3.8%, other -11.9% vs. 13.0%. Single procedure 12-month freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter-recurrence was 63.3% (76/120) vs. 59.0% (72/122) in the FIRM and Conventional arms (P = 0.3503). Efficacy was similar in the paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups (P = 0.22 and P = 0.48). The 10-day and 12-month safety endpoints were achieved in 93.3% vs. 93.8% (P = 0.89) and 88.4% vs. 93.4% (P = 0.22) in the FIRM and Conventional arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In REDO-FIRM, as compared to standard ablation, FIRM-guided ablation did not provide additional efficacy in redo ablation procedures, but FIRM-guided ablation was equally safe. Additional studies are necessary to identify any potential population able to benefit from FIRM-guided ablation.

Personalized ablation vs. conventional ablation strategies to terminate atrial fibrillation and prevent recurrence

AIMS

The long-term success rate of ablation therapy is still sub-optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), mostly due to arrhythmia recurrence originating from arrhythmogenic sites outside the pulmonary veins. Computational modelling provides a framework to integrate and augment clinical data, potentially enabling the patient-specific identification of AF mechanisms and of the optimal ablation sites. We developed a technology to tailor ablations in anatomical and functional digital atrial twins of patients with persistent AF aiming to identify the most successful ablation strategy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-nine patient-specific computational models integrating clinical information from tomographic imaging and electro-anatomical activation time and voltage maps were generated. Areas sustaining AF were identified by a personalized induction protocol at multiple locations. State-of-the-art anatomical and substrate ablation strategies were compared with our proposed Personalized Ablation Lines (PersonAL) plan, which consists of iteratively targeting emergent high dominant frequency (HDF) regions, to identify the optimal ablation strategy. Localized ablations were connected to the closest non-conductive barrier to prevent recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia. The first application of the HDF strategy had a success of >98% and isolated only 5-6% of the left atrial myocardium. In contrast, conventional ablation strategies targeting anatomical or structural substrate resulted in isolation of up to 20% of left atrial myocardium. After a second iteration of the HDF strategy, no further arrhythmia episode could be induced in any of the patient-specific models.

CONCLUSION

The novel PersonAL in silico technology allows to unveil all AF-perpetuating areas and personalize ablation by leveraging atrial digital twins.

Temporal and Spatial Changes of Proarrhythmic Substrate in Premature Ventricular Contraction-Induced Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The changes in proarrhythmic substrates and malignant ventricular arrhythmia mechanisms caused by premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy (PVCCM) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to establish the electrophysiological mechanism of how high-load PVC causes malignant arrhythmia.

METHODS

Thirteen swine were exposed to 50% paced PVC from the right ventricular apex for 12 weeks (PVCCM, n = 6) and no pacing for 12 weeks (control, n = 7). Cardiac function was quantified biweekly with echocardiography. Computed tomography scans and electrophysiological examinations were performed monthly to dynamically evaluate the changes in the cardiac structure and the arrhythmogenic substrate.

RESULTS

The decreases in the cardiac function and ventricular enlargement in the PVCCM group were significant after 12 weeks of PVC stimulation compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Electrophysiological examination found that the ventricular effective refractory period dispersion (0.071 ± 0.008), area of the low-voltage zone (9.41 ± 1.55 cm2), and malignant ventricular arrhythmia inducibility (33.3%) of the PVCCM group increased significantly at week 8 after pacing (P < 0.001 vs the control group); these changes slowed down after 8 weeks. Moreover, the distribution of the low-voltage zone presented obvious spatial heterogeneity, especially in the anterior wall of the right ventricle, accompanied by delayed activation in the sinus rhythm (67 ± 13 milliseconds). Consistently, the proportion of ventricular fibrosis- and expression-related proteins were significantly increased in the PVCCM group (P < 0.001), especially in the right ventricle. Moreover, proteomic analysis confirmed the spatial profile of these fibrotic changes in the PVCCM group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-burden PVC can cause significant temporal and spatial heterogeneity changes in proarrhythmic substrates, which are potentially related to the upregulation of calcium signaling caused by asynchronous activation.

Low voltage area guided substrate modification in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Low voltage areas (LVAs) on left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage mapping correlate with areas of fibrosis. LVAs guided substrate modification was hypothesized to improve the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation particularly in nonparoxysmal AF population. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies yielded mixed results.

METHODS

The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Relevant studies comparing LVA guided substrate modification (LVA ablation) versus conventional AF ablation (non LVA ablation) in patients with nonparoxysmal AF were identified and a meta-analysis was performed (Graphical Abstract image). The efficacy endpoints of interest were recurrence of AF and the need for repeat ablation at 1-year. The safety endpoint of interest was adverse events for both groups. Procedure related endpoints included total procedure time and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies with 1597 patients were included. A significant reduction in AF recurrence at 1-year was observed in LVA ablation versus non LVA ablation group (risk ratio [RR] 0.63 (27% vs. 36%),95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.62, p < .001]. Also, redo ablation was significantly lower in LVA ablation group (RR 0.52[18% vs. 26.7%], 95% CI 0.38-0.69, p < .00133). No difference was found in the overall adverse event (RR 0.7 [4.3% vs. 5.4%], 95% CI 0.36-1.35, p = .29).

CONCLUSION

LVA guided substrate modification provides significant reduction in recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias at 1-year compared with non LVA approaches in persistent and longstanding persistent AF population without increase in adverse events.

Effect of concomitant Renal DeNervation and cardiac ablation on Atrial Fibrillation recurrence - RDN+AF study

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) can reduce cardiac sympathetic activity maintained by arterial hypertension (aHT). Its potential antiarrhythmic effect on rhythm outcome in patients with multi-drug resistant aHT undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

METHODS

The RDN+AF study was a prospective, randomized, two-center trial. Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and uncontrolled aHT (mean systolic 24-h ambulatory BP > 135 mmHg) despite taking at least three antihypertensive drugs were enrolled. Patients were 1:2 randomized to either RDN+AF ablation or AF-only ablation. Primary endpoint was freedom from any AF episode > 2 min at 12 months assessed by implantable loop recorder (ILR) or 7d-holter electrocardiogram. Secondary endpoints included rhythm outcome at 24 months, blood pressure control, periprocedural complications, and renovascular safety.

RESULTS

The study randomized 61 patients (mean age 65 ± 9 years, 53% men). At 12 months, RDN+AF patients tended to have a greater decrease in ambulatory BPs but did not reach statistical significance. No differences in rhythm outcome were observed. Freedom from AF recurrence in the RDN+AF and AF-only group measured 61% versus 53% p = .622 at 12 months and 39% versus 47% p = .927 at 24 months, respectively. Periprocedural complications occurred in 9/61 patients (15%). No patient died.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with multidrug-resistant aHT and paroxysmal or persistent AF, concomitant RDN+AF ablation was not associated with better blood pressure control or rhythm outcome in comparison to AF-only ablation and medical therapy.

Characterization of Atrial Substrate to Predict the Success of Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The Prospective, Multicenter MASH-AF II (Multipolar Atrial Substrate High Density Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation) Study

Background Left atrial substrate may have mechanistic relevance for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to analyze the relationship between low-voltage zones (LVZs), transition zones, and AF recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective multicenter study on consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation-only approach. LVZs and transition zones (0.5-1 mV) were analyzed offline on high-density electroanatomical maps collected before pulmonary vein isolation. Overall, 262 patients (61±11 years, 31% female) with paroxysmal (130 pts) or persistent (132 pts) AF were included. After 28 months of follow-up, 73 (28%) patients experienced recurrence. An extension of more than 5% LVZ in paroxysmal AF and more than 15% in persistent AF was associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4 [95% CI, 2.0-9.8], P<0.001 and HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.7], P=0.04, respectively). Significant association was found between LVZs and transition zones and between LVZs and left atrial volume index (LAVI) (both P<0.001). Thirty percent of patients had significantly increased LAVI without LVZs. Eight percent of patients had LVZs despite normal LAVI. Older age, female sex, oncological history, and increased AF recurrence characterized the latter subgroup. Conclusions In patients undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation, the impact of LVZs on outcomes occurs with lower burden in paroxysmal than persistent AF, suggesting that not all LVZs have equal prognostic implications. A proportional area of moderately decreased voltages accompanies LVZs, suggesting a continuous substrate instead of the dichotomous division of healthy or diseased tissue. LAVI generally correlates with LVZs, but a small subgroup of patients may present with disproportionate atrial remodeling, despite normal LAVI.

Efficacy of left atrial low-voltage area-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-voltage area (LVA)-guided substrate modification catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Systematic searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were performed from inception to July 2022 for all available studies. The effect estimates were combined with the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to explore the sources of statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 1942 subjects (mean age: 61 ± 10 years, 69% male) were identified. All studies included patients with paroxysmal AF, non-paroxysmal AF, or both. At a mean follow-up of 18.9 months, patients who underwent LVA-guided substrate modification ablation had significantly higher freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence than patients who underwent control ablation [67.7% vs. 48.9%, risk ratios (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001], with 36% relative risk and 18.7% absolute risk reductions in all-atrial tachycardia recurrence. Subgroup analysis based on AF types demonstrated that the decreased risk of all-atrial tachycardia recurrence was present predominantly in non-paroxysmal AF compared with paroxysmal AF (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.69 vs. RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.13).

CONCLUSION

Low-voltage area-guided substrate modification ablation combined with PVI appears to have a significant beneficial effect of improving freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence, especially in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Low-Voltage Myocardium-Guided Ablation Trial of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Clinically effective ablation approaches for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are still being debated. So far, ablation targets and strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have failed to show systematic outcome improvement in randomized controlled clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether PVI plus individualized substrate ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium improves outcome in patients with persistent AF. We randomly assigned 324 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive PVI alone (163 patients; PVI only) or PVI plus substrate modification (161 patients; PVI+SM). The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia longer than 30 seconds after single ablation, with 3 months blanking, using serial 7-day electrocardiogram recordings over 12 months of observation. Patients were also encouraged to receive implantable cardiac monitors. RESULTS: The primary study end point occurred in 75 PVI-only patients (50%) and in 54 PVI+SM patients (35%) (Kaplan–Meier event rate estimates: hazard ratio=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.43 to 0.88, log rank P=0.006). Adverse events occurred in three PVI-only patients (1.8%) and in six PVI+SM patients (3.7%) (difference: −1.9 percentage points, 95% CI=−5.5 to 1.7 percentage points). Implant monitoring was used in 242 patients. Among them, 65 PVI-only patients (55%) versus 47 PVI+SM patients (39%) experienced recurrences (difference: 15 percentage points, 95% CI=3 to 28 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, PVI plus individualized ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium significantly improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02732626.)

Validating left atrial fractionation and low-voltage substrate during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm-A high-density mapping study in persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Low-voltage-substrate (LVS)-guided ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described either in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. Prolonged fractionated potentials (PFPs) may represent arrhythmogenic slow conduction substrate and potentially co-localize with LVS. We assess the spatial correlation of PFP identified in AF (PFP-AF) to those mapped in SR (PFP-SR). We further report the relationship between LVS and PFPs when mapped in AF or SR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with ablation naïve persistent AF underwent left atrial (LA) high-density mapping in AF and SR prior to catheter ablation. Areas presenting PFP-AF and PFP-SR were annotated during mapping on the LA geometry. Low-voltage areas (LVA) were quantified using a bipolar threshold of 0.5 mV during both AF and SR mapping. Concordance of fractionated potentials (CFP) (defined as the presence of PFPs in both rhythms within a radius of 6 mm) was quantified. Spatial distribution and correlation of PFP and CFP with LVA were assessed. The predictors for CFP were determined.

RESULTS

PFPs displayed low voltages both during AF (median 0.30 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.50 mV) and SR (median 0.35 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.56 mV). The duration of PFP-SR was measured at 61 ms (Q1-Q3: 51-76 ms). During SR, most PFP-SRs (89.4 and 97.2%) were located within LVA (<0.5 mV and <1.0 mV, respectively). Areas presenting PFP occurred more frequently in AF than in SR (median: 9.5 vs. 8.0, p = 0.005). Both PFP-AF and PFP-SR were predominantly located at anterior LA (>40%), followed by posterior LA (>20%) and septal LA (>15%). The extent of LVA < 0.5 mV was more extensive in AF (median: 25.2% of LA surface, Q1-Q3:16.6-50.5%) than in SR (median: 12.3%, Q1-Q3: 4.7-29.4%, p = 0.001). CFP in both rhythms occurred in 80% of PFP-SR and 59% of PFP-AF (p = 0.008). Notably, CFP was positively correlated to the extent of LVA in SR (p = 0.004), but not with LVA in AF (p = 0.226). Additionally, the extent of LVA < 0.5 mV in SR was the only significant predictor for CFP, with an optimal threshold of 16% predicting high (>80%) fractionation concordance in AF and SR.

CONCLUSION

Substrate mapping in SR vs. AF reveals smaller areas of low voltage and fewer sites with PFP. PFP-SR are located within low-voltage areas in SR. There is a high degree of spatial agreement (80%) between PFP-AF and PFP-SR in patients with moderate LVA in SR (>16% of LA surface). These findings should be considered when substrate-based ablation strategies are applied in patients with the left atrial low-voltage substrate with recurrent persistent AF.

Catheter ablation and thoracoscopic ablation in long persistent atrial fibrillation with large left atrium

Background

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the clinical outcomes of PVAI are unsatisfactory in patients with persistent AF and a large left atrium (LA).

Objectives

We investigated the clinical outcomes following radiofrequency ablation (RFCA), cryoballoon ablation (CBA), and thoracoscopic maze in patients with persistent AF and a large LA.

Methods

We included patients with consecutive persistent AF who had a large LA (LA diameter >50 mm) and underwent RFCA, CBA, or thoracoscopic maze surgery. In the RFCA group, additional linear ablation was performed at the physician’s discretion. The endpoint was 12 months without recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia, including AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia, following a 90-day blanking period.

Results

We recruited 89 persistent AF patients with a large LA who underwent RFCA (n = 32), CBA (n = 38), or the thoracoscopic maze procedure (n = 19). During the 12-month follow-up, 48 (53.9%) cases of AF recurrence were observed. There was no prognostic difference between groups (50.0% in RFCA vs. 52.6% in CBA vs. 63.2% in thoracoscopic maze, all P > 0.05). Early recurrence during the blanking period was a significant predictor of late recurrence for RFCA and CBA, but not for the thoracoscopic maze.

Conclusion

In persistent AF patients with a large LA, we did not find a prognostic difference RFCA, CBA, or a thoracoscopic maze procedure in recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Early recurrence predicted late recurrence in catheter ablation, but not in thoracoscopic maze.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of left atrial substrate modification in atrial fibrillation patients with low voltage areas

Background

The left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) are associated with atrial fibrosis; however, it is not clear how the left atrial LVAs affect the recurrence of arrhythmias after catheter ablation, and the efficacy and safety of the left atrial substrate modification based on LVAs as a strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are not evident for AF patients with LVAs.

Methods

We performed a systematic search to compare the arrhythmia recurrence in AF patients with and without LVAs after conventional ablation and arrhythmia recurrence in LVAs patients after conventional ablation with and without substrate modification based on LVAs.

Result

A total of 6 studies were included, involving 1,175 patients. The arrhythmia recurrence was higher in LVA patients after conventional ablation (OR: 5.14, 95% CI: [3.11, 8.49]; P < 0.00001). Additional LVAs substrate modification could improve the freedom of arrhythmia in LVAs patients after the first procedure (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: [0.15, 0.62]; P = 0.0009). However, there was no significant difference after multiple procedures (P = 0.19). The procedure time (MD: 26.61, 95% CI [15.79, 37.42]; P < 0.00001) and fluoroscopy time (MD: 6.90, 95% CI [4.34, 9.47]; P < 0.00001) in LVAs patients with additional LVAs substrate modification were significantly increased compared to LVAs patients' without substrate modification. Nevertheless, there were no higher LVAs substrate modification-related complications (P = 0.93) between LVAs patients with and without additional LVAs substrate modification. In the subgroup analysis, the additional LVAs substrate modification reduced the risk of arrhythmia recurrence in LVAs patients during the follow-up time, which was 12 months (OR: 0.32, 95% CI (0.17, 0.58); P = 0.002), and box isolation (OR: 0.37, 95% CI (0.20, 0.69); P = 0.002) subgroups, but the type of AF, follow up >12 months and homogenization subgroups were not statistically significant. Trial sequential analysis shows conclusive evidence for the LVAs ablation.

Conclusion

This study has shown that LVAs could improve the risk of arrhythmia recurrence in AF patients after conventional ablation. And additional LVAs substrate modification after conventional ablation could increase the freedom of arrhythmia recurrence in LVAs patients. Interestingly, the box isolation approach appeared more promising.

Systematic review registration

[http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021239277].

Serum periostin as a predictor of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Catheter ablation is an effective method of rhythm therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). AF recurrence is a common problem after catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate influence factors of early recurrence after catheter ablation for AF. One hundred and three consecutive patients with AF were enrolled and underwent catheter ablation. Venous blood (Marked as A) was collected before ablation and left atrial blood (Marked as B) was collected after successful atrial septal puncture to detect serum periostin. After 3 months of follow-up, statistical analysis was made based on the recurrence of AF. 27 (26.2%) patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation. Patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmia had a larger left atrial volume (162.31 ± 47.76 vs. 141.98 ± 41.64,p = 0.039), and higher serum periostin levels (periostin A. 99.71 ± 16.475 vs. 90.36 ± 13.63, p = 0.005; periostin B. 103.95 ± 13.09 vs. 94.46 ± 15.85, p = 0.006) compared with the non-recurrent group. The numbers of patients with left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) were more in the recurrence group (p < 0.001). Left atrial volume, serum periostin and left atrial LVAs were included in univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis. It showed that left atrial LVAs (HR3.81; 95% CI 1.54 to 9.44; p = 0.004) and serum periostin A (HR1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to1.13; p = 0.008) were the independent predictors of AF recurrence. The cut-off value of serum periostin A was 87.95 ng/ ml (AUC, 0.681; sensitivity 88.9% and specificity 53.9%). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the recurrence rate of AF was higher in patients with left atrial LVAs and higher serum periostin. The venous serum periostin level and left atrial LVAs were independent predictors of early recurrence of AF after catheter ablation.

Integrated Analysis of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA-Mediated Network and Its Potential Function in Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most prevalent arrhythmias, characterized by a high risk of heart failure and embolic stroke. Competing endogenous RNA network has been reported to play an important role in cardiovascular diseases. The main objective of the present study was to construct a circRNA–miRNA–mRNA-mediated network and explore the potential function in AF.

Methods

The microarray data of circRNA, miRNA, and mRNA in AF were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The RobustRankAggreg method was used to screen the different expression circRNAs(DECs). Then the circRNA–miRNA–mRNA-mediated network was constructed by using the CircInteractome database and the miRWalk online tool. A quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the circRNA expression level in plasma. The left atrial fibrosis was evaluated with the left atrial low voltage area (LVA) by using left atrial voltage matrix mapping.

Results

Three DECs (hsa_circRNA_102461, hsa_circRNA_103693, and hsa_circRNA_059880) and 4 miRNAs were screened. Then a circRNA–miRNA–mRNA-mediated network was constructed, which included 2 circRNAs, 4 miRNAs, and 83 genes. Furthermore, the plasma’s hsa_circ_0070391 expression level was confirmed to be upregulated and positively correlated with left atrial fibrosis in AF (r = 0.88, P < 0.001), whereas hsa_circ_0003935 was downregulated. Moreover, the ROC curve analysis revealed hsa_circ_0070391 and hsa_circ_0003935 could differentiate AF from the healthy controls with an AUC of 0.95 (95% sensitivity and 90% specificity) and 0.86 (70% sensitivity and 75% specificity), respectively. Finally, the free of atrial tachyarrhythmia rate was dramatically lower in the hsa_circ_0070391 high expression group than in the low expression group post catheter ablation (70.0 vs. 90.0%, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

This study provides a novel insight to further understand the AF pathogenesis from the perspective of the circRNA–miRNA–mRNA network, suggesting that plasma circRNAs could serve as a novel atrial fibrosis and prognosis biomarker for AF.

Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. Left atrial fibrosis plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AF and has been associated with poor procedural outcomes.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of targeting atrial fibrosis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in persistent AF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 44 academic and nonacademic centers in 10 countries. A total of 843 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic persistent AF and undergoing AF ablation were enrolled from July 2016 to January 2020, with follow-up through February 19, 2021.

Interventions

Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus MRI-guided atrial fibrosis ablation (421 patients) or PVI alone (422 patients). Delayed-enhancement MRI was performed in both groups before the ablation procedure to assess baseline atrial fibrosis and at 3 months postablation to assess for ablation scar.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was time to first atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period postablation. The primary safety composite outcome was defined by the occurrence of 1 or more of the following events within 30 days postablation: stroke, PV stenosis, bleeding, heart failure, or death.

Results

Among 843 patients who were randomized (mean age 62.7 years; 178 [21.1%] women), 815 (96.9%) completed the 90-day blanking period and contributed to the efficacy analyses. There was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence between groups (fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI patients, 175 [43.0%] vs PVI-only patients, 188 [46.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .63). Patients in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group experienced a higher rate of safety outcomes (9 [2.2%] vs 0 in PVI group; P = .001). Six patients (1.5%) in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group had an ischemic stroke compared with none in PVI-only group. Two deaths occurred in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group, and the first one was possibly related to the procedure.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with persistent AF, MRI-guided fibrosis ablation plus PVI, compared with PVI catheter ablation only, resulted in no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Findings do not support the use of MRI-guided fibrosis ablation for the treatment of persistent AF.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529319.

Low-voltage area substrate modification for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

AIMS

The value of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear, especially for persistent AF. The optimal target for substrate modification to improve outcomes is uncertain. We investigate the utility of low-voltage area (LVA) substrate modification in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Only randomized studies were included. AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA (LVA group) vs. conventional ablation approaches not targeting LVA (non-LVA group) were compared.

RESULTS

Four studies comprising 539 patients were included (36% female). Freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) in patients with persistent AF was greater in the LVA group [risk ratio (RR) 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.64]. There was no difference in FFA in patients with paroxysmal AF between groups (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.89-1.91). There was no difference in total procedural time (mean difference -17.54 min; 95% CI -64.37 to 29.28 min) or total ablation time (mean difference -36.17 min; 95% CI -93.69 to 21.35 min) in all included patients regardless of AF type between groups. There was no difference in periprocedural complications between groups in all included patients regardless of AF type (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.22-3.82).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates improved FFA in persistent AF patients who underwent voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA.