Pulsed-field ablation versus cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

Current thermal energy sources such as cryoballoon (Cryo) ablation technology are associated with high rates of reconnected pulmonary veins (PV), especially in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) may represent a more suitable ablation modality for this patient population. This study aims to compare the efficacy, and safety of PFA and Cryo in patients undergoing a PVI only approach for persistent AF.

Method

Patients with persistent AF who underwent PVI at a tertiary referral center using either PFA or Cryo were consecutively enrolled.

Results

A total of 220 patients (median age 66 [60-72] years, 24 % female) were included out of which 113 patients (51 %) underwent PFA and 107 patients (49 %) Cryoablation. Median procedure duration, LA dwell time and fluoroscopy time were shorter in the PFA group: 49 [39-61] min vs 60 [49-75] min (p < 0.001), 34 [25-43] min vs 37 [31--53] min (p < 0.001), and 9 [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]] min vs 11 [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]] min (p = 0.008). During a median follow-up of 365 days, recurrence-free survival was 72 % in the PFA group and 60 % in the Cryo group (pLog-rank = 0.079). The change in AF type from persistent AF to paroxysmal AF was more frequently observed after PFA than after Cryo (68 % vs 37 %; p = 0.011).

Conclusion

In patients with persistent AF undergoing a PVI only approach, PFA was associated with shorter procedural times and similar efficacy, with a higher frequency of regression from persistent to paroxysmal AF. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of ablation strategies beyond PVI when using PFA.

Feasibility and Safety of Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation approach using rapid electrical pulses to cause cardiac cell apoptosis via electroporation. Our study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of PFA for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients diagnosed with PeAF were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent PFA treatment using the strategy including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) isolation, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block, and mitral isthmus (MI) block. Acute and follow-up procedure outcomes were evaluated, and adverse events related to the ablation procedure were also observed.

RESULTS

One-year survival free from atrial tachyarrhythmia post-ablation was 65.6%. Acute success rates for PVI, LAPW isolation, CTI block, and MI block were 100%, 100%, 96.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. Eleven cases (34.4%) experienced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, with eight cases being atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and three cases being atrial flutter recurrence. Three patients underwent repeat ablation. Minor complications were encountered in four patients with asymptomatic cerebral lesions. Vagal responses were commonly observed during the procedure. No severe coronary vasospasm or severe hemolysis occurred in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

PFA with the strategy including PVI, LAPW isolation, CTI block, and MI block is feasible, safe, and associated with a high rate of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1 year in patients with PeAF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068980).

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

In vivo safety and pulmonary vein isolation performance of a new cryoballoon for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Cryoablation to achieve pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has become one of the standard approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The Arctic Front series cryoballoon and Achieve circular mapping catheter (Medtronic) inherently possess design defects that have been associated with unfavorite clinical outcomes. Lately, a new cryoablation system (Nordica Cryoablation System, Synaptic Medical) was developed with improved design of the cryoballoon and circular mapping catheter to address the inadequacies of current cryoablation technology. An animal study was conducted to test the efficacy and safety in performing PVI with the Nordica Cryoablation System.

METHODS

Pulmonary vein isolation with the Nordica Cryoablation System was performed on 12 PVs of six healthy canines. Acute PVI and peri-procedural complications were recorded. All animals underwent a repeat EP study at least 4 weeks after index procedures followed by pathological and histological assessments of the heart and collateral/downstream organs after planned euthanasia.

RESULTS

Acute PV isolation was achieved in all targeted PVs with 50% of PVs being isolated with a single cryoablation application. There were no major peri-procedural complications or device malfunction events. All PVs remained isolated after 29-30 days follow-up. Histological examination showed transmural cryo-lesions at treated sites with minimal inflammation, neovascularization, and neointima formation but no significant injury to adjacent tissue or embolization in downstream organs.

CONCLUSION

Acute and durable PVI can be achieved by using the novel Nordica Cryoablation System. Ablation with this new cryoablation system is associated with transmural lesions at targeted myocardium but creates no injury to the collateral tissues or downstream organs.

Real-world data of radiofrequency catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Short- and long-term clinical outcomes from the prospective multicenter REAL-AF Registry

BACKGROUND

The safety and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been well established. Contemporary techniques to optimize ablation delivery, reduce fluoroscopy use, and improve clinical outcomes have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the contemporary real-world practice approach and short and long-term outcomes of RF CA for PAF through a prospective multicenter registry.

METHODS

Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation; ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04088071) Registry, patients undergoing RF CA to treat PAF across 42 high-volume institutions and 79 experienced operators were evaluated. The procedures were performed using zero or reduced fluoroscopy, contact force sensing catheters, wide area circumferential ablation, and ablation index as a guide with a target of 380-420 for posterior and 500-550 for anterior lesions. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2470 patients undergoing CA from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. Mean age was 65.2 ±11.14 years, and 44% were female. Most procedures were performed without fluoroscopy (71.5%), with average procedural and total RF times of 95.4 ± 41.7 minutes and 22.1±11.8 minutes, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was 81.6% with 89.7% of these patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. No significant difference was identified comparing pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation approaches. The complication rate was 1.9%.

CONCLUSION

Refinement of RF CA to treat PAF using contemporary tools, standardized protocols, and electrophysiology laboratory workflows resulted in excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Hemodialysis (From the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry) - Clinical Impact of Early Recurrence

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients on hemodialysis (HD) is reported to have a high risk of late recurrence (LR). However, the relationship between early recurrence (ER) within a 90-day blanking period after CA in AF patients and LR in HD patients remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of the 5,010 patients in the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry, 5,009 were included in the present study. Of these patients, 4,942 were not on HD (non-HD group) and 67 were on HD (HD group). HD was an independent risk factor for LR after the initial CA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2; P=0.01). In patients with ER, the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 years after the initial CA was significantly lower in the HD than non-HD group (11.4% vs. 35.4%, respectively; log-rank P=0.004). However, in patients without ER, there was no significant difference in the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 years between the HD and non-HD groups (67.7% vs. 74.5%, respectively; log-rank P=0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

ER in HD patients was a strong risk factor for LR. However, even HD patients could expect a good outcome without ER after the initial CA.

Comparing pulsed field electroporation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: design and rationale of the BEAT PAROX-AF randomized clinical trial

AIMS

Using thermal-based energy sources [radiofrequency (RF) energy/cryo energy] for catheter ablation is considered effective and safe when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, treatment success remains limited and complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into non-target tissues. We aim to compare pulsed field ablation (PFA) with RF ablation in terms of efficacy and safety for patients with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The BEAT PAROX-AF trial is a European multicentre, superiority, open-label randomized clinical trial in two parallel groups. A total of 292 participants were recruited in 9 high-volume European clinical centres in 5 countries. Patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to PFA (FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System©, Boston Scientific) or RF using the CLOSE protocol with contact force sensing catheter (SmartTouch© catheter and CARTO© Biosense Webster). The primary endpoint will be the 1-year recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, and the major secondary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of acute (<7 days) procedure-related serious adverse events, or pulmonary vein stenosis, or atrio-oesophageal fistula up to 12 months. Additionally, five sub-studies investigate the effect of PFA on oesophageal safety, cerebral lesions, cardiac autonomic nervous system, durability of PVI as assessed during redo ablation procedures, and atrial and ventricular function. The study began on 27 December 2021 and concluded recruitment on 17 January 2024. Results will be available in mid-2025.

CONCLUSION

The BEAT PAROX-AF trial aims to provide critical insights into the optimal treatment approach for patients with paroxysmal AF.

Regional variations in patient selection and procedural characteristics for cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation in the cryo global registry

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is a well-established anatomical approach for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although widely adopted, regional variations in standards of care have not been well characterized.

METHODS

Patients with AF were enrolled in the Cryo Global Registry (NCT02752737) from May 2016 to Sept 2021 at 128 sites in 37 countries and treated with cryoballoon ablation according to local clinical practice. Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were summarized for 8 regions (Central Asia & Russia, East Asia, Europe, Middle East, North America, South Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia). Serious procedure-related adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated in a subset of patients with ≥ 7 days of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 3,680 patients undergoing initial PVI for AF were included. Cryoballoon ablation was commonly performed in patients with paroxysmal AF. Mean age ranged from 47 ± 12 years in the Middle East to 64 ± 11 years in East Asia. Mean procedure time was ≤ 95 min in all regions. Average freeze duration ranged from 153 ± 41 s in Southeast Asia to 230 ± 29 s in Central Asia & Russia. Acute procedural success was ≥ 94.7% in all geographies. In 3,126 subjects with ≥ 7 days of follow-up, 122 procedure-related SAEs were reported in 111 patients (3.6%) and remained low in all regions. One procedure-related death was reported during data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite regional variations in patient selection and procedural characteristics, PVI using cryoballoon ablation was performed with high acute success and short procedural times around the world.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02752737.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Left Atrium Volume Measured with Multislice Computed Tomography as a Prognostic Predictor for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Outcomes

Background: Current guidelines consider atrial fibrillation (AF) type as the prognostic factor for a recommendation of catheter ablation. We aimed to determine whether LA and LA appendage (LAA) volumes measured using multislice computed tomography (MSCT) were related to long-term outcomes in AF following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Methods: We evaluated 152 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF (median age, 55.8 ± 9.6 years), including 110 male patients, who underwent RFCA in a single center. All patients underwent MSCT imaging for anatomical assessment. The endpoint of this study was documented AF recurrence after RFCA. Results: The overall procedure success rate was 77.6% (n = 118) during a mean follow-up period of 12.6 months. The LA volume was significantly larger for those who experienced AF recurrence after RFCA than for the patients without recurrent AF after the procedure (153.8 ± 29.9 mL vs. 139.2 ± 34.1 mL, p = 0.025). However, LAA volumes were nearly equivalent between the patients with and without AF recurrence after RFCA (16.2 ± 6.3 mL and 14.7 ± 6.5 mL, respectively; p = 0.235). LA volume ≥ 153.2 mL was the optimal cutoff value for estimating AF recurrence after RFCA, with 94% sensitivity and 66% specificity. LA volume remained an independent predictor of both AF recurrence and permanent AF. Conclusions: LA volume as assessed by MSCT might be helpful for identifying patients likely to achieve successful AF ablation. LA volume ≥ 153.2 mL, but not LAA volume, showed good accuracy in predicting AF recurrence after RFCA.

Early Clinical Outcomes and Advantages of a Novel-Size Adjustable Second-Generation Cryoballoon: A Proof-of-Concept Study

(1) Background/Objective Balloon-guided catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an alternative option for atrial fibrillation (AF) management. The recent introduction of a novel-size adjustable second-generation cryoballoon (CB) system offers innovations, but clinical outcomes remain unexplored. This study aims to assess the acute performance of the POLARx FIT™ CB system in AFCA. (2) Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation with the POLARx FIT™ CB system in our center were included. The primary outcome was the rate of 31 mm balloon-size utilization, with secondary outcomes including acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) rate, periprocedural complications, and in-hospital AF recurrences. (3) Results: Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 59.5 years, predominantly male (87.5%), and exhibiting paroxysmal AF (91.7%) were enrolled. Procedural characteristics demonstrated a high acute success rate (100% PV isolation) with a favorable safety profile. Notably, the 31 mm CB configuration was utilized in 51% of applications, showcasing its adaptability in challenging anatomies. No major complications occurred, with two patients experiencing in-hospital self-limiting AF recurrences. (4) Conclusions: This study represents the first comprehensive assessment of the POLARx FIT™ CB system in AF ablation. While acknowledging the study's limitations, this novel CB emerges as a promising tool, warranting further exploration in larger studies with extended follow-up periods.

Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%; P = 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (P = 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (P = 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.

Outcomes After Supraventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension

Background

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with right ventricular pressure overload and atrial remodeling, which may result in supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). The outcomes of catheter SVT ablation in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) group 1 PH are incompletely characterized.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with WHO group 1 PH undergoing catheter SVT ablation during a 10-year period at a major academic tertiary care hospital. Baseline patient characteristics and procedural outcomes at 3 months and 1 year were extracted from the electronic medical record.

Results

Ablation of 60 SVTs was attempted in 38 patients with group 1 PH. The initial procedural success rates were 80% for atrial fibrillation (AF, n = 5), 89.7% for typical atrial flutter (AFL, n = 29), 57.1% for atypical AFL (n = 7), 60% for atrial tachycardia (AT, n = 15), and 75% for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT, n = 4). The 1-year post-procedural recurrence rates were 100% for AF (n = 4), 25% for typical AFL (n = 20), 50% for atypical AFL (n = 2), and 28.6% for AT (n = 7). No patients had recurrent AVNRT (n = 2). There were seven (18.4%) peri-procedural decompensations requiring pressor initiation and transfer to intensive care and one (2.6%) peri-procedural death.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates that SVT ablation in group 1 PH can be performed relatively safely and effectively, albeit with lower initial success rates and higher risk of clinical decompensation than in the general population. Recurrence rates at 1 year were higher in AF and atypical AFL ablations and similar for typical AFL and AT ablations when compared to the general population.

Pearls and Pitfalls of Pulsed Field Ablation

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) was recently rediscovered as an emerging treatment modality for the ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Ultra-short high voltage pulses are leading to irreversible electroporation of cardiac cells subsequently resulting in cell death. Current literature of PFA for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) consistently reported excellent acute and long-term efficacy along with a very low adverse event rate. The undeniable benefit of the novel ablation technique is that cardiac cells are more susceptible to electrical fields whereas surrounding structures such as the pulmonary veins, the phrenic nerve or the esophagus are not, or if at all, minimally affected, which results in a favorable safety profile that is expected to be superior to the current standard of care without compromising efficacy. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of electroporation are not yet entirely understood on a cellular basis and pulsed electrical field protocols of different manufactures are not comparable among one another and require their own validation for each indication. Importantly, randomized controlled trials and comparative data to current standard of care modalities, such as radiofrequency- or cryoballoon ablation, are still missing. This review focuses on the "pearls" and "pitfalls" of PFA, a technology that has the potential to become the future leading energy source for PVI and beyond.

Differences in postablation cardiac MRI scar between radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation: A DECAAF II subanalysis

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (Cryo) ablation are standard approaches for rhythm control in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Both strategies create scars in the left atrium (LA). There have been few studies investigating the difference in scar formation between patients undergoing RF and Cryo using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

METHODS

The current study is a subanalysis of the control arm of the Delayed-Enhancement MRI Determinant of Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation study (DECAAF II). The study was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial that evaluated atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) between PVI alone and PVI plus CMR atrial fibrosis-guided ablation. Preablation CMR and 3- to 6-month postablation CMR were obtained to assess baseline LA fibrosis and scar formation, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 843 patients randomized in the DECAAF II trial, we analyzed the 408 patients in the primary analysis control arm that received standard PVI. Five patients received combined RF and Cryo ablations, so they were excluded from this subanalysis. Of the 403 patients analyzed, 345 underwent RF and 58 Cryo. The average procedure duration was 146 min for RF and 103 min for Cryo (p = .001). The rate of AAR at ~15 months occurred in 151 (43.8%) patients in the RF group and 28 (48.3%) patients in the Cryo group (p = .62). On 3-month post-CMR, the RF arm had significantly more scar (8.8% vs. 6.4%, p = .001) compared to Cryo. Patients with ≥6.5% LA scar (p < .001) and ≥2.3% LA scar around the PV antra (p = .01) on 3-month post-CMR had less AAR independent of the ablation technique. Cryo caused a greater percentage of right and left pulmonary vein (PV) antral scar (p = .04, p = .02) and less non-PV antral scar (p = .009) compared to RF. On Cox regression, Cryo patients free of AAR had a greater percentage of left PV antral scar (p = .01) and less non-PV antral scar (p = .004) compared to RF free of AAR.

CONCLUSION

In this subanalysis of the control arm of the DECAAF II trial, we observed that Cryo formed a more significant percentage of PV antral scar and less non-PV antral scar compared to RF. Post ablation LA scar ≥6.5% predicted freedom from AAR, independent of ablation technique. These findings may have prognostic implications in ablation technique selection and freedom from AAR.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes and Heart Failure (from the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry)

The impact of rhythm outcomes on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations remains unknown after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to elucidate whether AF recurrence was associated with HF hospitalizations after AF RFCA. We conducted a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, observational study (Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry), enrolling 5,010 consecutive patients (age 64 ± 10 years, 27.3% female, and 35.7% nonparoxysmal AF) who underwent an initial AF RFCA at 26 centers. The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. The cumulative 3-year incidence of HF hospitalizations after the initial RFCA was 1.84% (0.69%/year). Hospitalized patients with HF were older with a higher prevalence of nonparoxysmal AF, renal dysfunction, diabetes, and underlying heart disease pre-RFCA. HF hospitalizations occurred more often in patients with than without recurrences (3.27 vs 0.84%, log-rank p <0.0001). After adjusting for confounders using a Cox model, AF recurrence remained an independent predictor of HF hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80 to 4.47, p <0.0001). AF recurrence was a distinct HF hospitalization risk in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% (HR 4.54, 95% CI 2.38 to 8.65, p <0.0001) but not <50% (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.62, p = 0.45), with significant interactions. Furthermore, patients with AF recurrences within 1 year had a greater HF hospitalization risk after 1 year (1.61% vs 0.79%, log-rank p = 0.019). In conclusion, AF recurrence after RFCA was independently associated with HF hospitalizations.

Q.Garcia-AlberolaA.MassaT.SabinG.FrankeA.SouzaJ. J.StanleyA.SpitzerS. G.WillemsS.DierkT.ChunK. R. J.BorchardR.SeidlK. H.ZahnR.GroschupG.ObelI. W. P.BrachmannJ.Gerds-LiJ. H.GopalR. R.SchrickelJ.LewalterT.StanleyA.MoshageW.EckardtL.JungW.KremerP.LubinskiA.SchumacherB.LickfettL.MünzelT.SteinwenderC.EfremidisM.DenekeT.NguyenD. Q., Garcia-Alberola A, Massa T, Sabin G, Franke A, Souza JJ, Stanley A, Spitzer SG, Willems S, Dierk T, Chun KRJ, Borchard R, Seidl KH, Zahn R, Groschup G, Obel IWP, Brachmann J, Gerds-Li JH, Gopal RR, Schrickel J, Lewalter T, Stanley A, Moshage W, Eckardt L, Jung W, Kremer P, Lubinski A, Schumacher B, Lickfett L, Münzel T, Steinwender C, Efremidis M, Deneke T, Nguyen DQ, for the FREEZE Cohort Study Investigators. Electrophysiology lab efficiency comparison between cryoballoon and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: a German sub-analysis of the FREEZE Cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended to treat paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This analysis aimed to assess the hospital efficiency of single-shot cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

The discrete event simulation used PVI procedure times from the FREEZE Cohort study to establish the electrophysiology (EP) lab occupancy time. 1000 EP lab days were simulated according to an illustrative German hospital, including 3 PVI cases per day using CBA at one site and RFA at the other.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1560 CBA patients and 1344 RFA patients from the FREEZE Cohort. Some baseline patients' characteristics were different between groups (age, AF type, and some concomitant diseases), without being statistically associated to ablation procedure time. Mean procedure time was 122.2 ± 39.4 min for CBA and 160.3 ± 53.5 min for RFA (p < 0.0001). RFA was associated with a more than five-fold increase of cumulative overtime compared to CBA over the simulated period (1285 h with RFA and 253 h with CBA). 70.7% of RFA lab days included overtime versus 25.7% for CBA. CBA was associated with more days with an additional hour at the end of the EP lab shift compared to RFA (47.8% vs 11.5% days with one hour left, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CBA is faster and more predictable than point-by-point RFA, and enables improvements in EP lab efficiency, including: fewer cumulative overtime hours, more days where overtime is avoided and more days with remaining time for the staff or for any EP lab usage. Clinical trial registration NCT01360008 (first registration 25/05/2011).

Comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited data comparing radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), which tends to have higher recurrence rates following ablation compared to paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database was performed for studies comparing RF vs CB ablation for persistent AF. An inverse-variance random-effects model was used to calculate the composite effects.

RESULTS

One randomized and 9 observational studies were identified, with 1650 patients receiving CB and 1706 patients receiving RF ablation. Mean follow-up time ranged from 12 to 48 months. Freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar with the two modalities (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.08, I² 0%). Total complications were similar in both groups (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.53, I² 0%) although rates of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) were greater with CB (RR 4.13, 95% CI 1.49 to 11.46, I² 0%). Shorter procedure times were observed with CB (mean reduction 43.77 min, 95% CI 66.45 to 21.09 min, I² 96%) with no difference in fluoroscopy time (mean difference 0.82 min, 95% CI - 11.92 to 13.55 min, I² 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

In persistent AF patients, CB ablation has similar efficacy and overall safety as compared to RF ablation. While CB is associated with significantly shorter procedure times, the improved procedural efficiency with CB is offset by increased rates of PNP and the potential need for touch-up RF ablation.

Atrial fibrillation ablation: the position of computed tomography in pre-procedural imaging

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia. Despite significant advances in its treatment, it still remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In the last two decades, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was developed as the most effective treatment option. The reported effectiveness of a single ablation procedure ranges from 40% to 69% with single, and up to 88% with repeated procedures, with acceptable safety profile. The PubMed database was searched, using terms including ‘atrial fibrillation ablation’, ‘pulmonary vein isolation’, ‘computed tomography’, ‘pulmonary vein anatomy’ and ‘ovality index’. Papers were reviewed for relevance and scientific merit. Different imaging techniques are used for pre-procedural assessment of left atrial (LA) anatomy, of which computed tomography (CT) is the most common. It allows assessing pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy, the LA wall thickness in different regions and the left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy, together with excluding the presence of intracardiac thrombi. Pre-procedural PVs imaging is important regardless of the selected ablation technique, however, cryoballoon (CB) ablation seems to be particularly anatomy-dependent. Additionally, CT also permits assessment of several PVs characteristics (geometry, dimensions, angulations, the ostium area, orientation and ovality index (OI), which are essential for the patients’ qualification and designing the strategy of AF ablation. In this paper, we have reviewed the role of CT imaging in patients undergoing ablation procedure due to recurrent/symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Moreover, we discussed the relevant literature.

Low 30-day Mortality after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation; Results from the Netherlands Heart Registration: NHR-AF Mortality Study

This study presents the 30-day mortality of patients who underwent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between 2013 - 2020 and were registered in the Netherlands Heart Registration. In total, 30,197/30,238 (99.9%) patients were analyzed. Fifteen (0.05%) died within 30 days. Nine deaths were considered procedurally related, four were considered non-procedural related, and in two patients the cause of death was unknown.

Optimal single procedure strategy of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon or radiofrequency and non-pulmonary vein triggers ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

Limited data exist on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation and additional non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF). We aimed to assess the outcomes of first-stage catheter ablation for non-PAF patients.

Methods

Initial PVI was performed on 734 non-PAF patients (age: 64 ± 10 years; male: 584 (80%)) between September 2014 and June 2018 [315 (43%), CB ablation; 419 (57%), RF catheter]. A logistic regression model was used to match 257 pairs (514 patients) according to the propensity scores (CB or RF group). After PVI, additional non-PV trigger ablation was performed if induced by isoproterenol. We analysed the clinical outcomes of both groups.

Results

The mean procedural time was significantly shorter in the CB group (125 [range, 89–165] min) than in the RF group (190 [160–224] min; P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier event rate revealed similar atrial fibrillation-free survival rates between the two groups (CB: 77.9%, RF: 82.3%; log-rank P = 0.111). The additional ablation percentage for non-PV foci (CB: 39%, RF: 41%; P = 0.653) and complication incidence (CB: 5%, RF: 4%; P = 0.670) were also similar.

Conclusions

In non-PAF patients, the combination strategy of PVI using CB or RF ablation and non-PV trigger ablation achieved comparable outcomes.

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is an emerging approach in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, yet its efficacy remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in AF ablation.

Objective

To assess the efficacy of PWI in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence following initial AF ablation at long-term follow-ups when compared to conventional methods.

Methods

We conducted a literature search from inception through September 2021 in EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included RCTs that compared outcomes in PWI and conventional approaches of AF ablation. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Eight RCT from 2009 to 2020, including 1024 AF patients, were included. PWI did not decrease overall atrial arrhythmias recurrence (RR 0.96, 95% CI:0.88-1.05, I 2 = 31.6%, p-value 0.393). However, the pooled analysis showed a significant decrease in AF recurrence in PWI compared to controlled approaches (RR 0.88, 95% CI:0.81-0.96, I 2 = 48.2%, p-value .004). In the subgroup analysis, PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in the studies that included only persistent AF (RR = 0.89, 95% CI:0.80-0.98, I 2 = 65.2%, p-value .014). PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence when compared to PVI with roof line (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, I 2 0.00%, p-value .008).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that adding PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF compared to controlled approaches. It highlights the importance of considering PWI during the initial procedure in this patient population.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly > 75 Years old: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly performed worldwide. As comfort with AF ablation increases, the procedure is increasingly used in patients that are older and in those with more comorbidities. However, it is not well established whether AF ablation in the elderly, especially those >75 years old, has comparable safety and efficacy to younger populations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety profiles in patients older than 75years undergoing AF ablation with younger patients.

METHODS

Databases from EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and Cochrane, were searched from inception through September 2021. Studies that compared the success rates in AF catheter ablation and all complications rates between patients who were older vs under 75 years were included. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven observational studies were included in the analysis consisting of 363,542 patients who underwent AF ablation. Comparing patients older than 75 years old to younger patients, there was no difference in the success of ablation rates between elderly and younger patients (pooled OR 0.85: 95% CI:0.69 - 1.05, p=0.131). On the other hand, AF ablation in the elderly was associated with higher complication rates (pooled OR 1.43: 95% CI:1.21 - 1.68, p<0.001) CONCLUSION: As AF ablation is expanded to elderly populations, our study found that AF ablation success rates were similar in both elderly and younger patients. However, older patients experience higher rates of complications that should be considered when offering the procedure and as a means to improve outcomes with future innovations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Treatment success and its predictors as well as the complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a high-volume centre

PURPOSE

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a standard procedure for maintaining sinus rhythm. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment success and its predictors and to provide quality control data on complications and redo operations in a centre with an initially a low but currently high annual volume.

METHODS

Data on patients (n = 1,253) treated with catheter ablation for AF in Tays Heart Hospital between January 2010 and May 2018 was evaluated (n = 1178 ablation-naïve patients and n = 1514 AF ablations). Comprehensive data on patient characteristics, treatment results, redo operations and complications were collected. Treatment success (maintenance of sinus rhythm at 1 year) was evaluated among patients residing within the hospital district (45% of the entire study population).

RESULTS

Treatment success was observed in approximately 62.9% of the ablation-naïve patients. Preoperative predictors of treatment success were paroxysmal AF type, previous use of antiarrhythmic drugs, left atrium diameter and age. The experience at the centre did not associate with the 1-year outcome. A relapse during the first 3-month blanking period was associated with a nine-fold risk of failure at 1 year (unadjusted OR 9.1, 95% CI 5.5-15.1, p < 0.001). The major complication rate was 4.5% (68/1514) with no deaths. Ten percent of the patients needed a redo procedure within the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-related factors are the most significant predictors of treatment success. A relapse during a 3-month blanking period is associated with a very high risk of failure at 1 year.

[Catheter ablation : Developments and technique selection]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and an important risk factor for the occurrence of cardiovascular events. According to current guidelines, rhythm-controlling therapy is recommended only for symptomatic AF. Even in symptomatic AF there is still only a class IIa-recommendation for catheter ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal AF. Meanwhile, current studies have shown an advantage of the early rhythm control compared to a rate control, as well as a benefit of catheter ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment. The gold standard of catheter ablation for AF therapy is pulmonary vein isolation, which has been mainly radiofrequency-based in the past. However, cryoablation as a first-line therapy of paroxysmal AF is increasingly gaining importance, as the latest studies showed shorter procedure times, lower reintervention rates and improved life quality after cryoablation. Nevertheless, using these standard techniques, the risk of adverse events is still given through collateral damage. The field high-power short duration ablation is currently topic of ongoing AF research, which describes a radiofrequency ablation with higher energy levels, given over shorter duration, with a consecutive lower recurrence rate as well as procedure time. The new ablation techniques also include the pulsed field ablation, which allows ablation through very fast delivery of electrical pulses and causes isolated damage to myocardial cells without collateral damage. This promising technique passed the efficiency and safety testing in preclinical studies. To validate this technique further randomized trials are needed.

Effects of Hot Balloon vs. Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

Background: Balloon-based catheter ablations, including hot balloon ablation (HBA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA), have rapidly emerged as alternative modalities to conventional catheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation owing to their impressive procedural advantages and better clinical outcomes and safety. However, the differences in characteristics, effectiveness, safety, and efficacy between HBA and CBA remain undetermined. This study compares the characteristic and prognosis differences between HBA and CBA.

Methods: Electronic search was conducted in six databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov, and medRxiv) with specific search strategies. Eligible studies were selected based on specific criteria; all records were identified up to June 1, 2021. The mean difference, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed using predefined criteria.

Results: Seven studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with CBA, more patients in the HBA group had residual conduction and required a higher incidence of touch-up ablation (TUA) [OR (95% CI) = 2.76 (2.02–3.77), P = 0.000]. The most frequent sites of TUA were the left superior pulmonary veins (PVs) in the HBA group vs. the right inferior PVs in the CBA group. During HBA surgery, the left and right superior PVs were more likely to have a higher fluid injection volume. Furthermore, the procedure time was longer in the HBA group than in the CBA group [weighted mean difference (95% CI) = 14.24 (4.39–24.09), P = 0.005]. Patients in the CBA group could have an increased risk of AF occurrence, and accepted more antiarrhythmic drug therapy; however, the result was insignificant.

Conclusions: HBA and CBA are practical ablation approaches for AF treatment. Patients who received HBA had a higher incidence of TUA and longer procedure time. Clinical outcomes during the mid-term follow-up between HBA and CBA were comparable.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=259487, identifier: CRD42021259487.

Cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation experience in Japan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In Japan, cryoballoon ablation has been widely accepted and more than 70 000 patients have undergone pulmonary vein isolation using this novel technology since the introduction. This review focused on the current status of cryoballoon ablation in Japan and clarified the characteristics as compared to Europe and the United States.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cryoballon ablation has rapidly increased over the last 6 years. Most of the Japanese physicians consider the indication of cryoballoon ablation based on the anatomy of the pulmonary veins and left atrium evaluated on preprocedural computed tomography, and often perform adjunctive radiofrequency ablation after the pulmonary vein isolation. The reported overall efficacy and safety were similar to that in Europe and the United States; however, there are some distinctive complications of the cryoballoon procedure in Japan, such as air embolisms, gastric hypomotility and coronary artery spasms.

SUMMARY

Currently, the cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation is widely accepted in Japan owing to the low incidence of lethal complications, shorter procedure time and acceptable single procedure atrial fibrillation freedom.

Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in a Patient with a Left Pneumonectomy

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) is the most important component of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and can be achieved by radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation (CBA). The CBA system has shown excellent efficacy and safety in a number of clinical trials and is independent of the PV anatomy. However, pneumonectomy can significantly alter the anatomy posing a challenge to CBA. Few cases of PVI accomplished by CBA have been described in patients with lobectomy, but none in the pneumonectomy population. We describe a case of successful CBA for paroxysmal AF in a patient with a left total pneumonectomy.

How effective is cryoablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation?

Pulmonary vein isolation is the standard for atrial fibrillation ablation. Although the most commonly applied energy source is radiofrequency (RF), cryoablation has rapidly evolved as a powerful one-shot tool, particularly after the introduction of the second-generation catheter, gaining widespread use in recent years. The efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm after a first ablative procedure is ∼70–80%, and the randomization studies comparing cryoablation to RF have not been able to reveal significant differences up to now. Although different baseline characteristics may influence the efficacy of cryoablation, we are not yet able to distinguish which patients may benefit from a personalized choice of ablative source. Regarding safety, cryoballoon ablation appears to be associated with a lower rate of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, mainly due to the lack of risk of overheating. The other side of the coin is a higher incidence of phrenic nerve damage, which occurs in 1–2% of procedures. In conclusion, we do not yet have definitive data to affirm the superiority of the RF technique over that of cryoablation. The choice of energy source currently depends on the availability of the centre and on the experience of the operator.

Independent factors of low radiation dose during atrial fibrillation ablation with cryoballoon or radiofrequency: Results from the "Go for zero fluoroscopy" registry

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is a common procedure requiring in most cases the use of fluoroscopy. We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with a lower dose of fluoroscopy used during AF ablation with cryoballoon or radiofrequency.

METHODS

In this prospective European registry, centers were requested to provide procedural characteristics of consecutive AF ablation cases. Lower doses of fluoroscopy were defined as those with dose-area-product (DAP) under the median dose used in the radiofrequency and the cryoballoon ablation groups.

RESULTS

A total of 638 AF ablation procedures were collected (n = 492 for radiofrequency and n = 146 for cryoballoon ablation groups) in 25 centers. The median [IQR] DAP were 926 [349;2092] and 1516 [418;3408] cGy*cm² in the radiofrequency and cryoballoon groups, respectively. Main factors associated with lower DAP in cryoballoon ablation group were electrophysiology dedicated laboratory (OR 6.04, 95%CI 1.16-31.54; P = .03) and frequent dosimetry report (OR 21.39, 95%CI 5.43-98.54; P = .03). Main factors associated with lower DAP in the radiofrequency ablation group were the use of a chest dosimeter (OR 12.57, 95% CI 2.88-54.90; P = .01), biplane X-ray equipment (OR 3.12, 95%CI 1.89-5.16; P < .01), university hospital (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.35-3.25; P = .01), electrophysiology dedicated laboratory (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.48-4.05; P < .01) and use of contact force enabled catheter (OR 22.60, 95%CI 6.82-74.88; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This real-life study of fluoroscopy use during AF ablation provides new data about current practices across European countries. Technological advances and quality of the fluoroscopic environment were the main factors associated with lower radiation dose during AF ablation.

Primary results of the Spanish Cryoballoon Ablation Registry: acute and long-term outcomes of the RECABA study

Cryoablation is safe and effective for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in controlled clinical trials, but contemporary real-world usage and outcomes are limited. The Report of the Spanish Cryoballoon Ablation Registry (RECABA) was designed to evaluate acute and 12-month outcomes of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of AF in Spain. Patients from 27 Spanish centers were prospectively enrolled. Patients were treated with cryoballoon ablation and managed according to standard of care protocols at each center. The primary endpoint was ≥ 30 s freedom from AF at 12-month after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints included a description of patient characteristics, cryoablation procedural strategy and safety, and predictors of efficacy. In total, 1742 patients (71.4% PAF, 68.8% male, mean age 58.02 ± 10.40 years, 76.1% overweight or obese, CHA2DS2-VASc index 1.40 ± 1.28) were enrolled. Patients received 7.2 ± 2.67 cryo-applications. PV potentials could be detected in 61% of the PVs during ablation, with a mean time to block of 52.9 ± 37.02 s. Acute PVI was observed in 97% of PVs with 75.8% isolated with the first cryo-application. Mean procedural time was 113 ± 41 min. Acute complications occurred in 4.4% of the cases. With follow-up in 1628 patients, AF-free survival was 78.5% (PAF: 80.6% vs PersAF 73.3%; p < 0.001). Left atrium enlargement, female sex, non-PAF, and early recurrence were independent predictors of AF recurrence (p < 0.05). RECABA provides detailed insight into current dosing practices and demonstrates cryoablation is safe and effective in real-world use.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02785991.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for optimizing the outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoablation -the role of isolation of PVs including carina

Purpose

Compared with conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency ablation, PVI with cryoballoon is an easier and shorter procedure without reconnection, particularly in the superior pulmonary vein. However, the durability of the cryoballoon may be reduced due to anatomical factors and the position of the pulmonary vein (PV). Further, inadequate isolation of the carina leads to recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to determine whether using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for patient selection improves the early success rate and prevents the recurrence of AF in PVI with cryoballoon.

Methods

We evaluated patients who underwent ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in our hospital between July 2019 and November 2020. After excluding patients with contraindications for cryoablation, 50 patients were selected through visual inspection of the results of preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. A treatment plan was established, and the clinical course and outcomes were followed up.

Results

Of the 200 PVs of the 50 patients, only 8 PVs (4%) were incompletely isolated with a single cryoablation. Six of the eight PVs were successfully isolated with additional cryoablation. Only 2 patients (4%) underwent additional PVI with radiofrequency ablation. Four patients had AF recurrence within a mean follow-up period of 14.3 ± 5.1 months. The rate of sinus rhythm maintenance was 92%. PV reconnection was observed in 2 patients. None of the patients had postoperative atrial flutter.

Conclusions

Selecting patients for cryoablation according to contrast-enhanced CT findings made the procedure easier to perform, leading to improved early success rates and clinical course.

Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Energy Sources Here to Stay

Energy sources used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have undergone an exceptional journey over the past 50 years. Traditional energy sources, such as radiofrequency and cryoablation, have been the mainstay of AF ablation. Novel investigations have led to inclusion of other techniques, such as laser, high-frequency ultrasound, and microwave energy, in the armamentarium of electrophysiologists. Despite these modalities, AF has remained one of the most challenging arrhythmias. Advances in the understanding of electroporation promise to overcome the shortcomings of conventional energy sources. A thorough understanding of the biophysics and practical implications of the existing energy sources is paramount.

Clinical outcomes following rhythm control for atrial fibrillation: is early better?

Introduction: An integral aspect of atrial fibrillation (AF) management involves better symptom control, incorporating a rate control, rhythm control, or a combination strategy. The 2020 ESC Guidelines suggest that rhythm control strategy should be recommended for symptomatic patients, to mitigate their symptoms and improve the quality of life. However, adequately powered randomized control trials and prospective 'real-world' registries are needed to fully assess the impact of early rhythm control strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with AF.Objective: In this narrative review, we discuss clinical outcomes following rhythm management approach among patients with AF, considering the effectiveness of an early intervention strategy.Expert opinion: Patients involvement and shared decision-making are crucial when deciding the optimal management strategy among patients with AF. For those with newly diagnosed symptomatic AF, an early invasive approach such as catheter ablation may have a role in preventing AF progression and subsequent pathophysiological changes.

Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF in a real-world global setting: Results from the Cryo AF Global Registry

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is a commonly used approach to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVES

Report on the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of AF in the largest global cohort of cryoablated patients prospectively studied within a single registry.

METHODS

The Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multi-center registry. Patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PsAF) were treated with the cryoballoon catheter according to routine practices at 93 sites across 36 countries. Primary efficacy endpoints included freedom from AF and freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 seconds. The primary safety endpoint was serious device- or procedure-related adverse events over 12 month follow-up.

RESULTS

During this evaluation window, 2922 subjects completed an index cryoballoon procedure, and 1440 completed 12 month follow-up. The cohort was 61 ± 12 years of age, 36.3% female, and 78.7% PAF. Serious device- and procedure-related adverse event rates were 1.5% and 3.4%, respectively. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT after the 90 day blanking period was 86.4% (95% CI: 84.3%-88.3%) in patients with PAF and 70.9% (95% CI: 64.6%-76.4%) in patients with PsAF. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT in first-line PAF and PsAF was 90.0% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.7%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 58.6%-83.0%) at 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cryo Global AF Registry is the largest evaluation to demonstrate cryoablation is an efficient, safe, and effective treatment for patients with AF worldwide. Cryoablation was commonly used to treat patients prior to an AAD failure and may facilitate earlier therapy for patients on the AF disease continuum.

Predictors of the "Crosstalk" Phenomenon During Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation is effective in achieving pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The "crosstalk" (CST) phenomenon has been reported to reduce unnecessary applications during CB ablation. Nevertheless, it is unclear under what conditions the CST phenomenon occurs.To seek the predictors of the CST phenomenon during CB-guided PVI, CST phenomenon in achieving ipsilateral superior PVI during inferior PV ablation was analyzed in AF patients who underwent de novo ablation using CB. CB occlusion status and nadir balloon temperature (NT) were compared in these patients, and all ablated superior PVs were categorized into three groups according to the necessity of the touch up ablation and effectiveness of the phenomenon.Of 1082 superior PVs, 16, 40, and 1026 were classified into the CST success, CST failure, and control groups (unnecessary CST), respectively. The proportion of superior PVs ablated with complete occlusion using the CB was significantly higher in the CST success group than in the other two groups. The proportion of superior PVs ablated with NT ≤ -46°C was higher in the CST success group than in the CST failure group. The CST phenomenon was always observed if CB ablation of the superior PVs was performed with both complete occlusion and NT ≤ -46°C and was almost always ineffective if it did not meet these two criteria (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 93%).Successful CST ablation was highly predicted if complete PV occlusion and NT ≤ -46°C during CB ablation of the superior PVs were achieved.

Acute success and safety of the second-generation PVAC GOLD phased RF ablation catheter for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The second-generation multi-electrode catheter, pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) GOLD, was designed to improve the delivery of phased radiofrequency energy and reduce procedure times using a 'single-shot' approach for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while retaining efficacy and safety. This large registry presents acute success rates and safety outcomes in a daily practice setting.

METHODS

A total of 1017 patients undergoing first-time ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) using PVAC GOLD were included, 644 patients with paroxysmal AF and 373 patients with non-paroxysmal AF, divided into 175 patients receiving PVI only and 198 patients receiving PVI with additional substrate modification.

RESULTS

High and comparable percentages of successful PVI could be achieved in all groups (98%, 95% and 99%; p = 0.108). The median total procedure time for all groups was 90 min [70-100]. As expected, the total procedure, ablation and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the PVI + substrate modification group compared with the PVI-only cases (all p < 0.001), but not between the PVI-only groups (p = 0.306, p = 0.088, p = 0.233, respectively). A total of 44 complications were observed in 43 patients (4.2%). Major complications were seen in 19 patients (1.87%) and non-major procedure-related complications were seen in 25 patients (2.46%). Complications leaving permanent sequelae were rare and occurred in only four patients (0.39%). Complications did not differ between groups (p = 0.199, p = 0.438, p = 0.240 and p = 0.465 respectively).

CONCLUSION

PVAC GOLD performs successful PVI, while reducing procedure times and retaining safety for paroxysmal, persistent and long-standing persistent AF. Safety was unaffected by additional substrate modification.

Real-World Safety Profile of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Second-Generation Cryoballoon in Japan: Insight From a Large Multicenter Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the incidence and characteristics of the real-world safety profile of second-generation cryoballoon ablation (2nd-CBA) in Japan.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation using second-generation cryoballoons is an accepted atrial fibrillation ablation strategy.

METHODS

This multicenter observational study included 4,173 patients with atrial fibrillation (3,807 paroxysmal) who underwent a 2nd-CBA in 18 participating centers. The baseline data and details of all procedure-related complications within 3 months post-procedure in consecutive patients from the first case at each center were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

Adjunctive ablation after the pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 2,745 (65.8%) patients. Complications associated with the entire procedure were observed in 206 (4.9%) total patients, and in the multivariate analysis, the age (odds ratio: 1.015; 95% confidence interval: 1.001 to 1.030; p = 0.035) and study period were predictors. Air embolisms manifesting as ST-segment elevation and cardiac tamponade requiring drainage occurred in 63 (1.5%) and 15 (0.36%) patients, respectively. Six (0.14%) patients had strokes/transient ischemic attacks, among whom 5 underwent ablation under an interrupted anticoagulation regimen. No atrioesophageal fistulae occurred; however, 10 (0.24%) patients had symptomatic gastric hypomotility. Esophageal temperature monitoring did not reduce the incidence, and the incidence was significantly higher in patients with adjunctive posterior wall isolations or mitral isthmus ablation than those without (p = 0.004). Phrenic nerve injury occurred during the 2nd-CBA in 58 (1.4%) patients; however, all were asymptomatic and recovered within 13 months. One patient died of aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study had a high safety profile of 2nd-CBA despite including the early experience and high rate of adjunctive ablation. Care should be taken for air embolisms during 2nd-CBA.

Cardiac Computed Tomography-Derived Left Atrial Volume Index as a Predictor of Long-Term Success of Cryo-Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently treated with catheter ablation. Cryo-ablation has been established as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation but long-term outcome data are still limited. This study aimed at elucidating the influence of the left atrial volume index (LAVI), derived from cardiac computed tomography (cCT) data, on the long-term outcome of ablation-naïve AF patients, after their first cryo-ablation. 415 patients (n = 290 [69.90%] male, 60.00 [IQR: 53.00 to 68.00] years old) who underwent a cCT and subsequent cryo-ablation index procedure were included in this single centre retrospective data analysis. A composite end point was defined (AF on electrocardiogram and/or electric cardioversion and/or re-do). Patients were closely followed for a year and then contacted for long-term follow-up after a median of 53.00 months (IQR: 34.50 to 73.00). Statistical analyses of the outcome and predictors of AF recurrence were conducted. In 224 patients (53.98%) no evidence of AF recurrence could be found. LAVI differed significantly between the positive and adverse (AF recurrence) outcome group (49.96 vs 56.07 ml/m², p < 0.001). Cox regression analyses revealed cCT LAVI (HR: 1.022, 95% CI: 1.013 to 1.031, p < 0.001), BMI (HR: 1.044, 95% CI: 1.005 to 1.084, p < 0.05) and the type of AF (HR: 1.838 for nonparoxysmal AF, 95% CI: 1.214 to 2.781, p < 0.01) to be effective predictors of AF recurrence. A prognostic cCT LAVI cut-off value of 51.99 ml/m² was calculated and must be validated in future prospective studies. In conclusion, LAVI is an accurate, yet underutilized predictor of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation with cryo-energy and scores for calculating AF recurrence or progression risks might underemphasize the importance of CT-derived LAVI as a predictive factor.

Surveys and Registries on Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Fifteen Years of History

Surveys and registries are widely used in medicine as valuable tools to integrate the information from randomized and observational studies. Early after its introduction in daily practice and parallel to its escalating popularity, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has been the subject of several surveys and registries. Over the years, relevant aspects associated with atrial fibrillation ablation have been investigated using these tools, including procedural safety and efficacy, discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy and risk of stroke postablation, and outcomes in special populations. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the contributions offered by surveys and registries in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation over the past 15 years.

Outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation program based on single-shot techniques

Introduction

Single-shot techniques such as cryoballoon and multipolar phased pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) are an alternative to the point-by-point radiofrequency method for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, there is a lack of data concerning sequential use of single-shot techniques, that is, for both the index and redo ablation.

Aim

To assess long-term outcomes of the ‘single-shot techniques only’ AF ablation strategy.

Material and methods

We analyzed all consecutive AF ablations performed over a 10-year period (2009–2019) in a center where a ‘single-shot technique only’ principle was followed from the start of the AF ablation program. Kaplan-Meier AF-free survival curves were calculated and complications were assessed on the basis of our prospectively maintained database.

Results

A total of 597 patients (62.4 ±12.5 years) with paroxysmal (78.1%) or persistent (21.9%) AF entered the study and 655 AF ablation procedures were performed. In 96.5% of redos (n = 58) a different technique (mostly PVAC) was used than for the index ablation (mostly cryoballoon). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1, 2 and 5 years freedom from AF were 78.2%, 69.2%, and 56.0%, for the index ablation, and 80.3%, 76.1% and 68.3%, for the redo, respectively. The minor and major complication rates were 8.1%, and 4.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

An AF ablation program based solely on sequential use of two different single-shot techniques for both index and redo procedures is safe and effective. These observations might have important practical implications for new operators/centers starting AF ablation programs and for use of single-shot techniques for redo procedures.

Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation

Aims

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for symptomatic paroxysmal or drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and results

Prospective cluster cohort study in experienced CBA and RFA centres. Primary endpoint was ‘atrial arrhythmia recurrence’, secondary endpoints were as follows: procedural results, safety, and clinical course. A total of 4189 patients were included: CBA 2329 (55.6%) and RFA 1860 (44.4%). Cryoballoon ablation population was younger, with fewer comorbidities. Procedure time was longer in the RFA group (P = 0.01). Radiation exposure was 2487 (CBA) and 1792 cGycm² (RFA) (P < 0.001). Follow-up duration was 441 (CBA) and 511 days (RFA) (P < 0.0001). Primary endpoint occurred in 30.7% (CBA) and 39.4% patients (RFA) [adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70–1.04; P = 0.12). In paroxysmal AF, CBA resulted in a lower risk of recurrence (adjHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99; P = 0.047). In persistent AF, the primary outcome was not different between groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rates were 1.0% (CBA) and 2.8% (RFA) (adjHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26–1.10; P = 0.088). Re-ablations (adjHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34–0.61; P < 0.0001) and adverse events during follow-up (adjHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.88; P = 0.005) were less common after CBA. Higher rehospitalization rates with RFA were caused by re-ablations.

Conclusions

The primary endpoint did not differ between CBA and RFA. Cryoballoon ablation was completed rapidly; the radiation exposure was greater. Rehospitalization due to re-ablations and adverse events during follow-up were observed significantly less frequently after CBA than after RFA. Subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk of recurrence after CBA in paroxysmal AF.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01360008), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01360008.

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation as a standard approach for interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation. A review and a practical guide to an effective and safe procedure

Since the cryoballoon was introduced into clinical practice, approximately half a million patients have undergone a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using this tool throughout the world. This single-shot technique makes the pulmonary vein isolation procedure easier and has the potential to expand access to the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), eventually leading to a reduction of the AF-related disease burden. Several studies and metanalyses have assessed the acute and long-term efficacy of cryoballoon-based PVI. The reported success rate of PV isolation during the procedure is about 98%. Despite this, the long-term effectiveness of the procedure (AF free survival) assessed at 1 year after the ablation is in the range of 70-82%. The AF-free survival rate significantly depends on the clinical characteristics of the studied group and the presence of risk factors, especially the type of AF (paroxysmal vs. persistent), LA size and the presence of heart failure. For a safe and effective procedure the electrophysiologist should be aware of all minute details of the procedure including several tricks developed by the most experienced operators and the pre-procedural and post-procedural management recommendations. Detailed knowledge of complications of cryoballoon (CB)-based ablation is mandatory. This review concentrates on the practical aspects and recommendations for a cryoballoon ablation procedure. The review is based on the authors' experience, including 800 procedures performed over 11 years with a low complication rate, and is presented within the context of the literature.