The Beadex Locus in Drosophila Melanogaster: On the Nature of the Mutants Bx and Bx

The Drosophila LIM-only gene, dLMO, is mutated in Beadex alleles and might represent an evolutionarily conserved function in appendage development

The process of wing patterning involves precise molecular mechanisms to establish an organizing center at the dorsal-ventral boundary, which functions to direct the development of the Drosophila wing. We report that misexpression of dLMO, a Drosophila LIM-only protein, in specific patterns in the developing wing imaginal disc, disrupts the dorsal-ventral (D-V) boundary and causes errors in wing patterning. When dLMO is misexpressed along the anterior-posterior boundary, extra wing outgrowth occurs, similar to the phenotype seen when mutant clones lacking Apterous, a LIM homeodomain protein known to be essential for normal D-V patterning of the wing, are made in the wing disc. When dLMO is misexpressed along the D-V boundary in third instar larvae, loss of the wing margin is observed. This phenotype is very similar to the phenotype of Beadex, a long-studied dominant mutation that we show disrupts the dLMO transcript in the 3' untranslated region. dLMO normally is expressed in the wing pouch of the third instar wing imaginal disc during patterning. A mammalian homolog of dLMO is expressed in the developing limb bud of the mouse. This indicates that LMO proteins might function in an evolutionarily conserved mechanism involved in patterning the appendages.

Isolation and characterization of the Beadex locus of Drosophila melanogaster: a putative cis-acting negative regulatory element for the heldup-a gene

We isolated recombinant lambda phage clones spanning 49 kilobases of DNA which contain the Beadex and heldup-a loci of Drosophila melanogaster. These cloned DNAs were used to analyze the structure of eight dominant mutant alleles of the Beadex locus which show increased gene activity. A region, only 700 base pairs in length, is altered in each of these mutants. Six of the mutations have DNA insertions within this segment. Most of these insertions resemble retrovirus-like transposable elements. In one case (Beadex2) the inserted sequences are homologous to the gypsy transposon family. The other two Beadex alleles were induced by hybrid dysgenesis and suffered deletions which included at least part of the 700-base-pair segment. These deletions appear to have resulted from imprecise excision or deletion of a nearby P element found in the wild-type parental strain. Analysis of one heldup-a allele (heldup-aD30r) indicates that a similar P element-mediated event is responsible for this lesion. In this mutant, deletion of sequences no more than 1,600 base pairs from the Beadex locus accompanies the loss of heldup-a function. The deleted sequences in heldup-aD30r include the entire 700-base-pair segment within which at least part of the Beadex locus resides, yet these flies have no Beadex phenotype. This indicates that a functional heldup-a gene is necessary for expression of the Beadex phenotype. Together, these results suggest that the Beadex functional domain is contained within a short segment of DNA near the heldup-a gene and support the hypothesis that the Beadex locus functions as a cis-acting negative regulatory element for the heldup-a gene.

Genetic identification of dominant overproducing mutations: the Beadex gene

A model system for the identification of presumptive overproducing mutations from among visible dominant mutations in D. melanogaster is described. An overproducing mutation is expected if a dominant mutation is readily reverted by gene deletion and if gene deletions suppress the expression of the original dominant mutation in flies heterozygous for the deletion. The Beadex (1:59.4) mutations are shown to satisfy these requirements, since a Bx dominant mutations is reverted by induced deletion [Df(Bx)/+) is wild type], and is also suppressed in trans by such a deletion [(Bx/Df)Bx) is wild type]. In addition, all 13 mutations recovered as Bx reversions or suppressors were associated with recessive held up (hdp) mutations allelic inter se, but not allelic to any known hdp gene. One such hdp mutations does not function as an independent dominant suppressor of Bx, is not always associated with Bx deletion, and in the latter situation is readily separable from Bx. We suggest that it functions as a Bx deletion, and may therefore represent the structural gene which is cis-regulated by the overproducing Bx mutations.

Developmental analysis of two wing scalloping mutantsct 6 andBx J ofDrosophila melanogaster

The mutantscut ⁶ (ct⁶) andBeadex of Jollos (Bx ^J) show nicks in the wing margins as well as other malformations in different regions of the body. Clonal analysis of the wing disk's development in these mutants indicates that massive cell loss occurs during the third larval instar. Morphogenetic mosaics, originating from mitotic recombination, reveal a non-autonomous behaviour of both mutant and wild-type cells. X-rays applied during the third larval instar produce phenocopies of these mutants. A clonal and a genetic analysis of these phenocopies has been carried out.The hypothesis that scalloping mutants such asct ⁶, Bx^J and others, as well as X-rays, affect properties of cellular interaction, such as cell adhesivity or cohesion, is discussed. Morphogenetic mosaics in the wing margin suggest that the differentiation of the marginal cuticular elements requires the interaction of the cells of the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the wing.