Natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster reveals genes associated with Coxiella burnetii infection

Embracing multiple infection models to tackle Q fever: A review of in vitro, in vivo, and lung ex vivo models

Multiple animal and cell culture models are employed to study pathogenesis of Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of acute and chronic human Q fever. C. burnetii is a lung pathogen that is aerosolized in contaminated products and inhaled by humans to cause acute disease that can disseminate to other organs and establish chronic infection. Cellular models of Q fever include a variety of tissue-derived cell lines from mice and humans such as lung alveolar ex vivo cells. These models have the advantage of being cost-effective and reproducible. Similarly, animal models including mice and guinea pigs are cost-effective, although only immunocompromised SCID mice display a severe disease phenotype in response to Nine Mile I and Nine Mile II isolates of C. burnetii while immunocompetent guinea pigs display human-like symptoms and robust immune responses. Non-human primates such as macaques and marmosets are the closest model of human disease but are costly and largely used for adaptive immune response studies. All animal models are used for vaccine development but many differences exist in the pathogen's ability to establish lung infection when considering infection routes, bacterial isolates, and host genetic background. Similarly, while cellular models are useful for characterization of host-pathogen mechanisms, future developments should include use of a lung infection platform to draw appropriate conclusions. Here, we summarize the current state of the C. burnetii lung pathogenesis field by discussing the contribution of different animal and cell culture models and include suggestions for continuing to move the field forward.

Drosophila melanogaster Sting mediates Coxiella burnetii infection by reducing accumulation of reactive oxygen species

The Gram-negative bacterium Coxiella burnetii is the causative agent of query fever in humans and coxiellosis in livestock. C. burnetii infects a variety of cell types, tissues, and animal species including mammals and arthropods, but there is much left to be understood about the molecular mechanisms at play during infection in distinct species. Human stimulator of interferon genes (STING) induces an innate immune response through the induction of type I interferons (IFNs), and IFN promotes or suppresses C. burnetii replication, depending on tissue type. Drosophila melanogaster contains a functional STING ortholog (Sting) which activates NF-κB signaling and autophagy. Here, we sought to address the role of D. melanogaster Sting during C. burnetii infection to uncover how Sting regulates C. burnetii infection in flies. We show that Sting-null flies exhibit higher mortality and reduced induction of antimicrobial peptides following C. burnetii infection compared to control flies. Additionally, Sting-null flies induce lower levels of oxidative stress genes during infection, but the provision of N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) in food rescues Sting-null host survival. Lastly, we find that reactive oxygen species levels during C. burnetii infection are higher in Drosophila S2 cells knocked down for Sting compared to control cells. Our results show that at the host level, NAC provides protection against C. burnetii infection in the absence of Sting, thus establishing a role for Sting in protection against oxidative stress during C. burnetii infection.

The genetic basis of variation in immune defense against Lysinibacillus fusiformis infection in Drosophila melanogaster

The genetic causes of phenotypic variation often differ depending on the population examined, particularly if the populations were founded by relatively small numbers of genotypes. Similarly, the genetic causes of phenotypic variation among similar traits (resistance to different xenobiotic compounds or pathogens) may also be completely different or only partially overlapping. Differences in genetic causes for variation in the same trait among populations suggests context dependence for how selection acts on those traits. Similarities in the genetic causes of variation for different traits, on the other hand, suggests pleiotropy which would also influence how natural selection shapes variation in a trait. We characterized immune defense against a natural Drosophila pathogen, the Gram-positive bacterium Lysinibacillus fusiformis, in three different populations and found almost no overlap in the genetic architecture of variation in survival post infection. However, when comparing our results to a similar experiment with the fungal pathogen, B. bassiana, we found a convincing shared QTL peak for both pathogens. This peak contains the Bomanin cluster of Drosophila immune effectors. Loss of function mutants and RNAi knockdown experiments confirms a role of some of these genes in immune defense against both pathogens. This suggests that natural selection may act on the entire cluster of Bomanin genes (and the linked region under the QTL) or specific peptides for specific pathogens.

TGF-β/IFN-γ Antagonism in Subversion and Self-Defense of Phase II Coxiella burnetii-Infected Dendritic Cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) belong to the first line of innate defense and come into early contact with invading pathogens, including the zoonotic bacterium Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever. However, the pathogen-host cell interactions in C. burnetii-infected DCs, particularly the role of mechanisms of immune subversion beyond virulent phase I lipopolysaccharide (LPS), as well as the contribution of cellular self-defense strategies, are not understood. Using phase II Coxiella-infected DCs, we show that impairment of DC maturation and MHC I downregulation is caused by autocrine release and action of immunosuppressive transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Our study demonstrates that IFN-γ reverses TGF-β impairment of maturation/MHC I presentation in infected DCs and activates bacterial elimination, predominantly by inducing iNOS/NO. Induced NO synthesis strongly affects bacterial growth and infectivity. Moreover, our studies hint that Coxiella-infected DCs might be able to protect themselves from mitotoxic NO by switching from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, thus ensuring survival in self-defense against C. burnetii. Our results provide new insights into DC subversion by Coxiella and the IFN-γ-mediated targeting of C. burnetii during early steps in the innate immune response.

Shedding Light on Inter-Individual Variability of Olfactory Circuits in Drosophila

Inter-individual differences in behavioral responses, anatomy or functional properties of neuronal populations of animals having the same genotype were for a long time disregarded. The majority of behavioral studies were conducted at a group level, and usually the mean behavior of all individuals was considered. Similarly, in neurophysiological studies, data were pooled and normalized from several individuals. This approach is mostly suited to map and characterize stereotyped neuronal properties between individuals, but lacks the ability to depict inter-individual variability regarding neuronal wiring or physiological characteristics. Recent studies have shown that behavioral biases and preferences to olfactory stimuli can vary significantly among individuals of the same genotype. The origin and the benefit of these diverse "personalities" is still unclear and needs to be further investigated. A perspective taken into account the inter-individual differences is needed to explore the cellular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. This review focuses on olfaction in the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster and summarizes previous and recent studies on odor-guided behavior and the underlying olfactory circuits in the light of inter-individual variability. We address the morphological and physiological variabilities present at each layer of the olfactory circuitry and attempt to link them to individual olfactory behavior. Additionally, we discuss the factors that might influence individuality with regard to olfactory perception.

Behavior Individuality: A Focus on Drosophila melanogaster

Among individuals, behavioral differences result from the well-known interplay of nature and nurture. Minute differences in the genetic code can lead to differential gene expression and function, dramatically affecting developmental processes and adult behavior. Environmental factors, epigenetic modifications, and gene expression and function are responsible for generating stochastic behaviors. In the last decade, the advent of high-throughput sequencing has facilitated studying the genetic basis of behavior and individuality. We can now study the genomes of multiple individuals and infer which genetic variations might be responsible for the observed behavior. In addition, the development of high-throughput behavioral paradigms, where multiple isogenic animals can be analyzed in various environmental conditions, has again facilitated the study of the influence of genetic and environmental variations in animal personality. Mainly, Drosophila melanogaster has been the focus of a great effort to understand how inter-individual behavioral differences emerge. The possibility of using large numbers of animals, isogenic populations, and the possibility of modifying neuronal function has made it an ideal model to search for the origins of individuality. In the present review, we will focus on the recent findings that try to shed light on the emergence of individuality with a particular interest in D. melanogaster.