Association Between Contrast Sensitivity and Physical Function in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: The Brain Networks and Mobility Function Study

Correlation of contrast sensitivity with ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness and damage location in glaucoma with varying severity

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation of contrast sensitivity with macular region ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GC/IPL) thickness and damage location in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) of varying severity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study with 106 patients (203 eyes) who had OAG. Contrast sensitivity of each eye evaluated by quick contrast sensitivity function test based on intelligent algorithm. The GC/IPL thickness measured with optical coherence tomography; six sectors were delineated for localization of damage area. All eyes were grouped by the healthy macular sector and divided into pre-perimetric, early, moderate, and advanced stages, according to severity of visual field impairment.

RESULTS

Mean GC/IPL thickness in the entire macular region and each sector were correlated with parameters that reflected contrast sensitivity (p < 0.01). The structure-function correlations were stronger nasally compared with temporally, and superiorly compared with inferiorly. Eyes with normal structure in inferior temporal sector had less visual field (p' = 0.024) and macular damage (p' = 0.034) compared with eyes that had healthy superior nasal sector; there was no difference in contrast sensitivity (p = 0.898). The structure-function correlations were significant in early, moderate, and advanced glaucoma (p < 0.05) but not in pre-perimetric glaucoma (p = 0.116).

CONCLUSIONS

GC/IPL thinning in all sectors of the macular region in OAG was correlated with contrast sensitivity impairment, whereas the inferior temporal sector was least affected. Contrast sensitivity was supported as a severity evaluation indicator of early, moderate, and advanced glaucoma, but not of pre-perimetric glaucoma.

Can children measure their own vision? A comparison of three new contrast sensitivity tests

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of children measuring their own contrast sensitivity using a range of tablet- and paper-based tests.

METHODS

Forty children aged 5-15 years with amblyopia (N = 10), bilateral vision impairment (N = 10) or good vision (N = 20) measured their own vision on a screen-based optotype test (Manifold), a gamified vision test (PopCSF) and a paper-based test (Spotchecks) in a laboratory with minimal supervision. Completion rate, test-retest repeatability, test duration and participants' preferences were recorded for each test.

RESULTS

Most participants (36/40) were able to perform all three tests. All tests were correlated with clinically measured visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (p < 0.001). The 95% coefficient of repeatability was 0.30 dB for Manifold, 0.29 dB for PopCSF and 0.13 dB for Spotchecks. All tests differentiated between children with reduced contrast sensitivity and control participants. PopCSF and Spotchecks were also able to differentiate between children with amblyopia and those with good vision. Median test time was 152, 130 and 202 s for Manifold, PopCSF and Spotchecks, respectively. Twenty-two participants preferred the PopCSF test, 10 preferred Spotchecks and 6 preferred Manifold. Thirty-nine out of the 40 children (98%) said they would measure their own vision at home using at least one of these tests every month.

CONCLUSIONS

Children and young people can test their own contrast sensitivity with repeatable results. Of these three tests, the most repeatable was Spotchecks, the quickest was PopCSF and participants' favourite was PopCSF. Nearly all of the participants said they would be willing to use at least one of the three tests at home.

The relationship between visual function and physical performance in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA)

PURPOSE

The relationship of types of visual function to different aspects of physical function, especially strength and coordination, has been understudied, but delineation of these relationships could suggest potentially modifiable targets prior to the onset of disability.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of visual function (self-reported eyesight and eye disease, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and physical function tests in 877 older adults (mean age 76.36±5.01 years, 59.2% women, and 13.3% Black race). Separate linear regression models were constructed for short physical performance battery (SPPB), expanded SPPB (eSPPB), their components (gait speed, chair stand, balance, narrow walk), stair climb, four-square step, leg extension peak power and strength, and grip strength.

RESULTS

In adjusted models, worse acuity, worse contrast sensitivity, and self-reported poor vision were significantly associated with worse performance on the eSPPB and four-square step test. Worse contrast sensitivity, but not acuity, was significantly associated with shorter balance times, slower chair stand pace, longer stair climb time, and worse SPPB score. Associations of worse acuity and contrast sensitivity with weaker leg extension power, leg strength, and grip strength were attenuated by covariate adjustment. Self-reported macular degeneration, but not cataract or glaucoma, was associated with worse performance on SPPB, eSPPB, balance, stair climb, and four-square step tests in adjusted models. Worse contrast sensitivity and macular degeneration remained associated with worse SPPB and balance after controlling for visual acuity and self-reported eyesight.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor contrast sensitivity was more strongly associated with worse physical performance than acuity, especially for complex tasks that dynamically challenge coordination and balance. Future studies should examine if older adults with contrast sensitivity impairment would benefit from targeted intervention to decrease their risk of disability.