Implementation of STAR-VA for behavioral symptoms of dementia in acute care: Lessons learned

As the population grows, the incidence of dementia will increase. A common occurrence in people with dementia is behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). BPSD can include apathy, aggression, resistance to care, and agitation. BPSD can start or worsen during an acute hospitalization, but these units are not well-equipped to handle BPSD, often relying on pharmacological interventions to address distress behaviors. One known behavioral intervention for BPSD is STAR-VA, an interdisciplinary approach to managing these behaviors. However, this intervention has not been utilized in acute care. Our team implemented STAR-VA in acute care at a Veterans Affairs hospital in the northeastern United States. Using the VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) implementation roadmap to guide our work, we first outlined the problem, completed a needs assessment with staff, and began implementation. Results from this quality improvement project demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of STAR-VA in an acute care setting.

Factors Related to Higher and Lower Performance and Adherence in STAR-VA Program Sustainment in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Community Living Centers (CLCs)

OBJECTIVES

We identify factors associated with sustainment of an intervention (STAR-VA) to address distress behaviors in dementia (DBD), guided by the Organizational Memory Knowledge Reservoir (KR) framework, compared across 2 types of outcomes: (1) site performance improvement on a clinical outcome, the magnitude of change in levels of DBD, and (2) self-rated adherence to STAR-VA core components, a process outcome.

DESIGN

We used a cross-sectional sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided by the Organizational Memory Framework.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We selected 20 of 79 sites that completed STAR-VA training and consultation based on rankings on 2 outcomes-change in an indicator of DBD and reported adherence to STAR-VA core components. We recruited key informants most knowledgeable about STAR-VA resulting in a sample of 43% behavioral coordinators, 36% nurse champions, and 21% nurse leaders.

METHODS

We collected data with key informants at each Community Living Center (CLC) from December 2018 to June 2019. We analyzed data using within-case and cross-case matrixes created from the coded transcripts for each a priori KR domain. We then assessed if there were any similarities or differences for CLCs in comparable DBD performance and STAR-VA adherence categories.

RESULTS

We found 4 KRs that differentiated sustainment factors based on CLC implementation process and clinical outcomes-3 KRs related to DBD performance (people, relationships, and routines) and 2 related to STAR-VA adherence (relationships and culture).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This evaluation found several knowledge retention mechanisms that differ in high and low performance/adherence sites. Our findings highlight knowledge retention/sustainment strategies based on site functioning to support sustainment strategies in the CLC. Understanding sustainment factors as they relate to clinical and process outcomes is innovative and can be used to support CLCs struggling with sustainment. More research is needed to inform tailored sustainment efforts based on site functioning in the nursing home setting.

A short staff training system for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in care facilities, based on functional analysis and positive behaviour support: a single-arm pre- and post-comparative study

BACKGROUND

Work schedules can make it challenging for professional care workers to participate in long-term training programs on managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Simultaneously, it is necessary to prevent caregivers' negative responses to BPSD, provide a positive environment for people with dementia, and create a system for new management plans, since the initial one is often unsuccessful. Therefore, we developed a short manual-based training system for functional analysis including positive behaviour support and strategies when management plans do not function well. This study aimed to preliminarily examine the usefulness of this system.

METHODS

Thirty-five staff members from 12 care facilities participated in the training. For each facility, off-the-job training was performed in two 120-min sessions held over 2 days. Then, care plans were implemented by staff members for a month, during which on-the-job training was provided. The study included 14 people with dementia and BPSD. This was a single-arm study without a control group. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to examine the effects of the training system using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version.

RESULTS

The results of the pre- and post-tests for the total scores on severity and occupational disruptiveness significantly improved, with large effect sizes. Regarding symptom domains, delusions, agitation/aggression, and aberrant motor behaviour significantly improved in both severity and occupational disruptiveness. Depression/dysphoria and anxiety significantly improved in severity; however, there were trends of improvement in occupational disruptiveness. In addition, the effect sizes for severity and occupational disruptiveness of delusions and agitation/aggression were large.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study suggests that the training system is promising. A randomised controlled trial with a larger sample size is necessary to confirm the findings.

Implementation Lessons Learned: Distress Behaviors in Dementia Intervention in Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based practices to manage distress behaviors in dementia (DBD) are not consistently implemented despite demonstrated effectiveness. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) trained teams to implement Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences (STAR)-VA, an intervention to manage DBD in VA nursing home settings, or Community Living Centers (CLCs). This paper summarizes multiyear formative evaluation results including challenges, adaptations, and lessons learned to support sustained integration into usual care across CLCs nationwide.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

STAR was selected as an evidence-based practice for DBD, adapted for and piloted in VA (STAR-VA), and implemented through a train-the-trainer program from 2013 to 2018. Training and consultation were provided to 92 CLC teams. Evaluation before and after training and consultation included descriptive statistics of measures of clinical impact and survey feedback from site teams regarding self-confidence, engagement, resource quality, and content analysis of implementation facilitators and challenges.

RESULTS

STAR-VA training and consultation increased staff confidence and resulted in significant decreases in DBD, depression, anxiety, and agitation for Veterans engaged in the intervention. Implementation outcomes demonstrated feasibility and identified facilitators and barriers. Key findings were interpreted using implementation frameworks and informed subsequent modifications to sustain implementation.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

STAR-VA successfully prepared teams to manage DBD and resulted in improved outcomes. Lessons learned include importance of behavioral health-nursing partnerships, continuous engagement, iterative feedback and adaptations, and sustainment planning. Evaluation of sustainment factors has informed selection of implementation strategies to address sustainment barriers. Lessons learned have implications for integrating team-based practices into system-level practice.

Weaving Evidence into Action for Veterans with Dementia (WEAVE): Evaluation of implementation into long-term care practice

RATIONALE

Veterans living with dementia in long-term care have complex needs, with variable manifestation of symptoms of dementia that interact with their lived experience. Best practice dementia care prioritises nonpharmacological interventions; of which few have strong evidence. Implementation of evidence is complex, with evaluation of outcomes and processes necessary.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This paper details the evaluation of implementation, at veteran and organisational level, of the Weaving Evidence into Action for Veterans with Dementia (WEAVE) programme.

METHODS

A Type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design was used, underpinned by the Implementation Framework for Aged Care (IFAC). Programme intervention incorporated music therapy, exercise, reminiscence therapy and/or sensory modulation, offered over a 24-week period. Evaluation components included: (1) programme effectiveness for veterans with dementia for responsive behaviour, physical wellbeing, cognitive status, emotional state, medications and falls (at baseline, 8-week, 16-week and 24-week); and (2) implementation outcomes of reach and adoption, feasibility and acceptability, fidelity (via interviews) and a preliminary cost analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight veterans participated in the 24-week programme, with high levels of engagement in interventions of their choice. Statistically significant improvements were seen across all veteran-level outcome measures, for functional capacity and reduced neuro-psychiatric and depressive symptoms. Ten staff members were interviewed, highlighting co-designed core elements were feasible and acceptable, and the momentum generated by resident and staff enthusiasm. Cost analysis included costs of programme set-up and running the 24-week intervention.

CONCLUSION

Key components of programme success were the therapeutic leaders, adherence to core elements of programme design, and veterans' choice in meaningful activity. Cost analysis supports deliberations for upscale across further care homes.

Weaving Evidence into Action for Veterans with dementia (WEAVE): Codesigning the implementation of nonpharmacological interventions for programme fidelity and sustainability

RATIONALE

Challenges associated with translating evidence into practice are well recognised and calls for effective strategies to reduce the time lag and successfully embed evidence-based practices into usual care are loud and clear. While a plethora of nonpharmacological interventions for people with dementia exist; few are based on strong evidence and there is little consideration for programme operationalisation in the complex environment of long-term care.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This paper describes the preparation for the implementation of the Weaving Evidence into Action for Veterans with dementia project, incorporating the codesign of delivery of four evidence-based, nonpharmacological interventions.

METHOD

Implementation preparation for this type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation project was underpinned by the Implementation Framework for Aged Care (IFAC). A sociocultural-political contextual scan was undertaken, and reflection on the IFAC question 'why change?' with key stakeholders. Delivery of the four interventions of music therapy, exercise, reminiscence therapy and sensory modulation was explored using codesign methodology. Preparation of both intervention delivery personnel and recipients was via training, establishment of a change team and promotional/awareness-raising strategies.

RESULTS

The contextual scan revealed Australian government reforms and organisational imperatives facing long-term care services, while reflections on 'why change' flagged best practice dementia care at the local care home level. Several codesign sessions involved veterans with dementia, family members, care home staff members and volunteers to ensure programme alignment with needs and preferences, accounting for existing activities. Training was designed and delivered before programme commencement. A change team was established and strategies to support behaviour change instigated. Implementation evaluation is reported elsewhere.

CONCLUSION

The extended preparatory period for implementation, afforded by the COVID-19 pandemic on programme commencement, enabled time for widespread understanding of the programme and necessary upskill of staff. Comprehensive codesign with all stakeholders of programme components identified core and flexible elements necessary for fidelity of implementation.

'There's no straight line…' a consumer-informed intervention for FTD family care partners: the STELLA-FTD pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Behavioral symptoms and communication challenges are particularly apparent in frontotemporal degenerative (FTD) dementias. There is a paucity of psychoeducation programming specifically tailored to the needs of families with FTD. We revised an existing intervention to meet the needs of these families.

METHODS

We used a quasi-experimental approach. In Phase 1, we sought consumer input about an existing intervention. In Phase 2, we modified the intervention based on the qualitative findings from Phase 1 and tested the revised intervention (STELLA-FTD) for feasibility, acceptability and early-stage efficacy. Outcome for Phase 2 included feasibility data and care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors. Secondary outcomes included data from unobtrusive sleep monitoring. An inductive analysis of transcripts from the Phase 2 STELLA-FTD focus group provides guidance for future revisions.

RESULTS

Fifteen family care partners participated in the Phase 1 focus groups; sixteen care partners enrolled in Phase 2. Testing in Phase 2 revealed that the care partners found our consumer-informed revised intervention both feasible and acceptable. The post-intervention findings suggest STELLA-FTD has the potential to reduce care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors and to decrease care partner burden. Sleep did not change over the 8-week intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised STELLA-FTD intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable, and has potential to improve care partner burden for families living with FTD. Providing the intervention via telehealth maximized access and engaged rehabilitation specialists in providing disease management content. Future revisions will include examination of efficacy and mechanism of action (OHSU IRB # 00022721, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05338710).

Supporting Sustained STAR-VA Implementation: Evaluation of a Sustainment Coaching Program

OBJECTIVES

The Veterans Health Administration (VA) STAR-VA program is a person-centered, interdisciplinary intervention for managing distress behaviors in dementia in VA nursing homes, called Community Living Centers (CLCs). Teams often struggle to sustain STAR-VA after site-lead partner turnover. The STAR-VA Sustainment Coaching Program was developed to support a new local STAR-VA behavioral coordinator and/or nurse champion (ie, site-leads) and engage the team to implement sustainment strategies. The aims of this evaluation were to document sustainment needs, barriers and facilitators, and effective strategies used during a sustainment intervention.

DESIGN

We describe qualitative and quantitative findings of a program evaluation of the STAR-VA Sustainment Coaching pilot program.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Eight CLC teams participated in the pilot program, 5 training a new nurse champion, 2 a new behavioral coordinator, and 1 both new site-leads.

METHODS

CLC teams completed a needs assessment, developed sustainment goals and plans, tracked sustainment interventions implemented, and reported case outcomes. Outcome assessment and tracking reports were summarized and themes identified using a qualitative inductive approach.

RESULTS

Common sustainment needs were to train a new nurse champion, promote staff understanding of dementia and distress behaviors, and promote a culture of person-centered dementia care. Most sites selected sustainment goals of implementing training procedures and behavioral rounds. Sustainment barriers included limited staff time, staff turnover, lack of supportive routines and tools, and limited awareness of STAR-VA. Facilitators included leadership support, staff interest, and training resources. Most sites reported successful implementation of STAR-VA behavior rounds, whereas strategies to achieve training-related goals had variable success.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The STAR-VA Sustainment Coaching Program helped CLC teams identify and implement strategies to support sustained STAR-VA implementation. The results of this project are informing ongoing efforts to integrate STAR-VA components into usual care processes for CLC residents with dementia.

Identifying Factors Affecting the Sustainability of the STAR-VA Program in the Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sustained implementation of new programs in complex care systems like nursing homes is challenging. This prospective qualitative evaluation examined factors affecting the sustainability of the Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences in Veterans Health Administration (STAR-VA) program in Veterans Health Administration (VA) Community Living Centers (CLC, i.e., nursing homes). STAR-VA is an evidence-based interdisciplinary, resident-centered, behavioral approach for managing distress behaviors in dementia.

EVALUATION DESIGN AND METHODS

In 2019, we conducted 39 semistructured phone interviews with STAR-VA key informants across 20 CLCs. We identified a priori themes based on the Organizational Memory Framework, which includes 7 Knowledge Reservoirs (KRs): people, routines, artifacts, relationships, organizational information space, culture, and structure. We conducted content-directed analysis of transcripts to identify factors to program sustainment.

RESULTS

We identified 9 sustainment facilitators across KRs: engaged site leaders and champions, regular meetings and trainings, written documentation and resources, regular and open communication, available educational tools (e.g., handouts and posters), adequate spaces, leadership support on many levels, staff buy-in across disciplines, and staff competencies and recognition. Ten barriers across KRs included: staffing concerns, inconsistent/inefficient routines, inconsistent documentation, lack of written policies, communication gaps, nonstandardized use of tools, constraints with meeting spaces and regulations on posting information, limited leadership support, division among staff, and missing performance expectations.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Findings inform tailored strategies for optimizing STAR-VA program sustainment in CLCs, including the development of a sustained implementation guide, implementation resources, regional communities of practice, and STAR-VA integration into national CLC quality improvement routines for team communication and problem-solving.

Evaluation of Antipsychotic Reduction Efforts in Patients With Dementia in Veterans Health Administration Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVE

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) each created initiatives to reduce off-label use of antipsychotics in patients with dementia in nursing homes. Although CMS has reported antipsychotic reductions, the impact on prescribing of antipsychotic and other CNS-active medications in the VHA remains unclear. The authors evaluated national trends in antipsychotic and other CNS-active medication prescribing for nursing home patients with dementia in the VHA.

METHODS

The study sample was all veterans with dementia residing in VHA nursing homes for more than 30 days (N=35,742). Using an interrupted time-series design, the quarterly prevalences of antipsychotic, antidepressant, antiepileptic, anxiolytic, opioid, and memory medication prescribing were evaluated from FY2009 through FY2018.

RESULTS

Antipsychotic prescribing in VHA nursing homes declined from FY2009 to FY2018 (from 33.7% to 27.5%), with similar declines in anxiolytic prescribing (from 33.5% to 27.1%). During this period, prescribing of antiepileptics, antidepressants, and opioids increased significantly (antiepileptics: from 26.8% to 43.3%; antidepressants: from 56.8% to 63.4%; opioids: from 32.6% to 41.2%). Gabapentin served as the main driver of antiepileptic increases (from 11.1% to 23.5%). Increases in antidepressant prescribing included sertraline, mirtazapine, and trazodone. From FY2009 to FY2018, the overall prescribing of non-antipsychotic psychotropic medications grew from 75.0% to 81.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic and anxiolytic prescribing for VHA nursing home residents with dementia declined, although overall prescribing of other psychotropic and opioid medications increased. Policies focused primarily on reducing antipsychotic use without considering use in the context of other medications may contribute to growth in alternative medication classes with even less evidence of benefit and similar risks.

Mental Health Needs of Aging Veterans: Recent Evidence and Clinical Recommendations

Objectives: Large numbers of older Americans have a history of military service, which may be positively or negatively associated with mental health in late life. We reviewed literature with the aim of better understanding the mental health needs of older Veterans.Methods: Articles included those published in 2009-2018 and focused on prevalence/risk for mental illness and suicide among older Veterans; utilization of mental health services; effectiveness of evidence-based behavioral treatments; and pertinent care delivery models.Results: Older Veterans are generally resilient. A significant minority experience mental health concerns that are associated with poor outcomes including a substantial number of suicides. Most published research is based on the approximately one third of Veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for care. Older Veterans with mental health diagnoses are less likely to utilize mental health services compared to younger Veterans, but as likely to benefit once engaged. Integrated care models in primary and geriatric care settings are promising.Conclusions: Aging Veterans are a large subset of Americans whose mental health needs are complex and deserve attention.Clinical Implications: Clinicians should ask about history of military service (i.e., Veteran status) and utilize available resources when providing care for older Veterans.

Impact of an interdisciplinary intervention for distress behaviors in dementia on psychotropic drug use in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers: STAR-VA impact on psychotropic drug utilization

STAR-VA is an interdisciplinary behavioral approach for managing distress behaviors in residents with dementia, implemented at Veterans Health Administration nursing homes. This study evaluated the impact of STAR-VA implementation on psychotropic drug use. The study design is a retrospective, quasi-experimental cohort analysis of residents enrolled as STAR-VA training cases compared with eligible residents at untrained sites to evaluate treatment effects on psychotropic medication use. We matched 229 STAR-VA cases with 1,163 comparisons. STAR-VA cases experienced an average reduction of 0.92 "as-needed" doses per month (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.82, -0.02) compared with controls. No significant effect on non-STAR-VA cases in trained facilities was detected. STAR-VA programs are an important option for reducing potentially inappropriate psychotropic use.

Implementation of an integrative movement program for residents with dementia in a VA nursing home

BACKGROUND

Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIÉ) is an integrative group movement program developed for adults with mild-to-moderate dementia attending day programs. However, many older adults with dementia ultimately require assistance with their activities of daily living and become residents in nursing homes or other long-term care facilities with their complex comorbidities and unique needs. We conducted a post-implementation evaluation of PLIÉ at a San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing home to assess reach and effectiveness among residents, staff, and family members who participated in ≥ 1 PLIÉ class from 9/2018 to 6/2019.

METHODS

Post-implementation number of classes offered and mean attendance; anonymous satisfaction surveys (5-point Likert scales); qualitative content analysis of open-ended survey responses and clinical progress notes.

RESULTS

Forty-five PLIÉ classes were offered over 9 months. Residents attended an average of 13 ± 12 classes with an average class size of 14 residents, 4 staff members, and 2 family members. Most survey respondents rated the program overall as "very good" or "excellent" (100 % residents, n = 15; 87 % staff, n = 14; 100 % family members, n = 8). Respondents reported improvements in themselves and/or others in four domains: (1) physical, (2) psychological, (3) social, and (4) cognitive. Physical improvements among veterans included mobility, strength, and energy. Psychological improvements included feelings of happiness/well-being, enjoyment, and self-empowerment. Social improvements included connection, social skills, and social support. Cognitive improvements included engagement, communication ability, and focus/attention. Responses were similar among resident, staff, and family member surveys and clinical progress notes. Participants frequently reported improvements in multiple domains (e.g., "The veterans are more alert and engaged, many are smiling and laughing."). Negative comments were primarily related to logistics, suggesting that the class occur more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

PLIÉ was successfully implemented in a VA nursing home with high attendance and satisfaction among residents, staff, and family members. Participants reported clinically meaningful physical, psychological, social, and cognitive benefits. Other long-term care facilities could potentially benefit from implementing PLIÉ to increase quality of life in residents with dementia.

Impact of STAR-VA on Staff Injury and Disruptive Behavior Reports in VA Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVES

Workplace disruptive behavior incidents can be costly for organizations, employees, and customers. Persons with dementia living in long-term care settings have a high risk of exhibiting distressed behaviors. We examined whether a resident-centered, behavioral intervention for residents with dementia led to a reduction in reported workplace disruptive behaviors and staff injury rate due to assault. Impactful interventions are important for quality of care.

DESIGN

We examined whether a team-based behavioral program in community living centers (CLCs), where a nurse champion and behavioral coordinator were trained to work with the clinical team to understand and manage distressed behaviors commonly associated with dementia, was associated with reductions in behavior incidents.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The setting was Veterans Health Administration CLCs. The sample consisted of 120 aggregated CLCs operating between 2012 and 2017 with 62 completing training. CLCs were distributed across the United States.

METHODS

Outcomes included CLC-level rates of staff injury and number of workplace disruptive behavior incidents. Outcomes were regressed on measures of intervention completion, time since intervention, and several CLC characteristics.

RESULTS

The intervention was significantly associated with lower incidence of assault with staff injury rates overall, particularly following the first year of training, but not with other reported workplace disruptive behavior incident rates.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

A team-based behavioral intervention was associated with reduction of employee assaults, a critical repercussion of distressed behavior in dementia. Given rapid growth in patients with dementia in nursing homes, effective treatment practices, such as interdisciplinary behavioral management approaches may be impactful and valuable to implement.

Practitioners' identification of informal caregivers' difficulties with activities of daily living interventions for older people with dementia in Japan

BACKGROUND

Older people with dementia who cannot perform daily activities independently due to cognitive impairment need support at home and in the community. This study identified aspects of activities of daily living (ADL) interventions that advanced dementia care practitioners recognise as challenging for informal caregivers to perform.

METHODS

We conducted a self-administered cross-sectional survey on advanced dementia care practitioners, including certified nurses, specialising in gerontological, community health, home care, and visiting nursing, nurses specialising in dementia certified by the Japanese Nursing Association, and dementia care leaders certified by prefectural governors. The participants rated a caregivers' extent of difficulty in aspects of ADL interventions on a four-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was performed to determine ADL intervention aspects that are recognised by advanced dementia care practitioners as challenging for informal caregivers.

RESULTS

The highest loaded factors for mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment stages were 'right time to draw attention,' 'opportunities to perform ADL,' and 'communicating how to perform ADL without giving up,' respectively. Therefore, it is imperative to educate informal caregivers about the effects of cognitive impairment on ADL performance in people with dementia and enable them to provide concrete ADL interventions and tips to support the persons' autonomy and independence. The Cronbach's alpha values of the highest loaded factors for mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment stages were 0.851, 0.925, and 0.946, respectively. Moreover, the cumulative contribution ratios of each stage were 46.04%, 50.52%, and 47.36%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study dealt with identifying informal caregivers' difficulties with ADL interventions across the stages of dementia. Informal caregivers should be supported on aspects of ADL interventions that are potentially difficult for them to perform. Useful educational content and approaches in training programs for informal caregivers should be developed to enable them to help people with Alzheimer's disease maintain ADL performance toward 'ageing in place' even as the disease progresses.

A mixed methods study on the manifestations of behavioural symptoms of dementia among veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder

AIMS

To explore how behavioural symptoms of dementia are manifested among veterans in residential long-term care settings, in the context of personal, interpersonal/social and environmental triggers and how the manifestations differ between veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis using a mixed methods approach.

METHODS

We analysed text data from a stratified random sample of 66 cases derived from the programme evaluation dataset of the Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration (STAR-VA) intervention from 2013 to 2016, using framework analysis. The detailed behavioural assessment descriptions in this dataset are consistent with contemporary non-pharmacologic symptom management. Qualitative categories were converted to quantitative variables for two group comparisons.

RESULTS

Four patterns emerged linking specific types of triggers and behavioural symptoms: (1) unmet physical needs or emotional distress triggers non-aggressive behaviours; (2) unsolicited direct care approach triggers care refusal, resistance or combativeness; (3) interpersonal interactions interfering with self-direction trigger aggressive behaviours; and (4) uncontrolled stimulation from environments trigger non-aggressive behaviours. The organisational culture of care influenced how staff conceptualised behavioural symptoms. Veterans with co-existing posttraumatic stress disorder and dementia tended to exhibit rejection of care with aggression compared to those with dementia alone.

CONCLUSION

Contextualised accounts of behavioural symptoms of dementia revealed symptom heterogeneity, with different clusters of multi-level triggers arising from specific personal, interpersonal and environmental circumstances. Distinct patterns of symptom manifestations between veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder suggest a tailored approach is required to meet each veteran's unique biopsychosocial needs.

IMPACT

Classifying behavioural symptoms with their triggers rather than solely by behaviours provides important new information for developing person-centred, non-pharmacological interventions to improve outcomes for veterans with dementia. Multi-level interventions should be considered to meet veteran's needs that account for their earlier life history and current life circumstances.

Rejection of Care and Aggression among Older Veterans with Dementia: The Influence of Background Factors and Interpersonal Triggers

OBJECTIVES

To test relationships among background factors, interpersonal triggers, rejection of care, and aggression among veterans living with dementia in residential long-term care settings, based on the need-driven dementia-compromised behavior model.

DESIGN

A mixed methods secondary analysis of program evaluation data from the Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration intervention implemented by the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In total, 315 older veterans who participated in the 2013‒2016 Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration program at 76 Community Living Centers (Veterans Affairs-operated nursing homes).

METHODS

Text data that captured the interdisciplinary team observations of distressed behaviors of concern and their circumstances were coded into categorical variables and then combined with existing quantitative data to test hypothesized relationships using structural equation modeling.

RESULTS

Rejection of care was directly affected by interpersonal triggers (β = 0.32, P < .005) and background factors such as depression (β = 0.29, P < .018), anxiety (β = -0.18, P < .023), and cognitive status (β = 0.10, P < .049). Depression also had an indirect effect on rejection of care through interpersonal triggers (α × β = 0.13 × 0.32 = 0.04, P < .012). Aggression was directly affected by both interpersonal triggers (β = 0.19, P < .009) and functional status (β = 0.17, P < .011). Both function (α × β = 0.12 × 0.19 = 0.02, P < .035) and depression (α × β = 0.13 × 0.19 = 0.03, P < .005) had indirect effects on aggression through interpersonal triggers.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Interpersonal triggers influenced rejection of care and aggression in veterans with dementia. Background factors such as depression and severity of functional impairment increased the likelihood of these symptoms. Study findings emphasize the importance of developing and implementing interventions that improve interpersonal relationships and developing targeted interventions for those with depressive symptoms.

The Moderating Role of Pain Self-efficacy in the Relationships Among Caregiver Burden and Care Recipient Pain and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in a Sample of Persons With Dementia

Past research suggests relationships among dementia caregiver burden and care recipient pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms, but no prior work has examined the influence of pain self-efficacy on these associations. A sample of 502 dementia caregivers completed an online protocol assessing caregiver burden and care recipient neuropsychiatric symptoms, presence of pain, and pain self-efficacy in this cross-sectional, observational study. The indirect effect of neuropsychiatric symptoms on the relationship between pain and caregiver burden was significant. Pain self-efficacy significantly moderated the effect of pain on neuropsychiatric symptoms (P=0.04) and the direct association between pain and caregiver burden (P=0.004), but did not moderate the indirect effect. Future research should explore how pain influences neuropsychiatric symptoms, and whether improvement in pain self-efficacy in dementia care recipients attenuates the influence of pain on neuropsychiatric symptoms and caregiver burden in other samples.

An MDS 3.0 Distressed Behavior in Dementia Indicator (DBDI): A Clinical Tool to Capture Change

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Persons with dementia frequently demonstrate distress behaviors in dementia (DBD), associated with poorer outcomes. This study aimed to create a measure of DBD from routinely administered Minimum Data Set (MDS 3.0) behavior section items that demonstrated sensitivity to change, for evaluation of intervention efforts for VA Community Living Center (CLCs) residents exhibiting DBD.

SETTING

72 VA nursing home settings, or Community Living Centers (CLCs).

PARTICIPANTS

CLC residents with DBD (n = 302) were enrolled in an interdisciplinary behavioral intervention between 2013 and 2017.

DESIGN

A factor analysis of MDS behavior section items from assessments closest to baseline was conducted. Internal consistency, hypothesized associations between MDS factors and clinical measures, and sensitivity to detect change over time was explored.

MEASUREMENTS

Residents were assessed at baseline and post-intervention using the MDS behavior section items and a validated clinical measure of DBD.

RESULTS

The Distress Behavior in Dementia Indicator (DBDI) was created as a consistent factor with internal consistency, and was related to a validated measure as predicted at baseline and post-intervention. Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by using change score correlations (r = 0.40-0.50), effect size (d = 0.63), and reliable change indices.

CONCLUSION

The DBDI is recommended for routine use in CLCs to evaluate impact of intervention effectiveness and provide quality improvement feedback.

Institutionalized elderly people with dementia: an integrative review on nursing care

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the characteristics of the nursing care provided to institutionalized elderly people with dementia.

METHODS

Integrative review of studies published between 2013 and 2017, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, from the databases BDENF, LILACS, CINAHL, PubMed, SciELO, TRIP, and National Guideline Clearing House. Thematic data analysis was used.

RESULTS

From the data collected in the 41 included studies, three themes emerged: Care with a focus on the needs of elderly people in LTCIEs; Care based on the work process of the nursing team; and Shared care. Final considerations: Elderly care can take place from different perspectives: that of the elderly; the nursing team; and it can be shared among the different parties involved. The importance of communication must be stressed, as do the development of skills and attitudes of the team, as well as proper training and support, good environment in the care process, and an approach centered on the institutionalized elderly.

A Systematic Review of Home-Setting Psychoeducation Interventions for Behavioral Changes in Dementia: Some Lessons for the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Assistance

BACKGROUND

Impacts of social isolation measures imposed by COVID-19 Pandemic on mental health and quality of life of older adults living with dementia and their caregivers remain unexplored. Studies have shown that psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions can manage behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) and reduce the emotional burden on family members when applied in home-setting scenarios.

METHOD

a comprehensive systematic review of useful interventions for easing the BPSD burden in patients with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers in the context of COVID-19 quarantine was performed from January 2010 to March 2020.

RESULTS

From a total of 187 articles retrieved from electronic databases (MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane and SCOPUS), 43 studies were eligible for this review. Most of the psychosocial and psychoeducational interventions described were person-centered strategies based on the cognitive-behavioral approach or informational tools to enhance care providers' knowledge of dementia. Most studies achieved successful results in handling BPSD and mood-anxiety symptoms of care providers, contributing to an overall improvement in dyad life quality.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from the last few years suggest that low-cost techniques, tailored to the dyad well-being, with increasing use of technology through friendly online platforms and application robots, can be an alternative to conventional assistance during COVID-19 Pandemic. Nevertheless, the world's current experience regarding the duration of the COVID-19 Pandemic and its effects on the cognition, behavior, and life quality of PwD will demand research on preventive and protective factors of dementia and the pursue of efficient interventions in different scenarios.

Addressing Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia Through STAR-VA Implementation: Do Outcomes Vary by Behavior Type?

OBJECTIVES

The STAR-VA program in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers (CLCs, nursing home settings) trains teams to implement a psychosocial intervention with residents with behavioral symptoms of dementia (BSD).

METHODS

Across 71 CLCs, 302 residents selected as training cases had target behaviors categorized into one of 5 types: physically aggressive (PA), physically nonaggressive, verbally aggressive, verbally nonaggressive, and behavior deficit (BD).

RESULTS

Across all groups, there were significant declines in team-rated behavior frequency (36%) and severity (44%), agitation (10%), distress behaviors (42%), depression (17%), and anxiety (20%). The magnitude of changes varied across behavior category. For example, those with a PA target behavior experienced a greater percentage decline in agitation and distress behavior scores, and those with a BD target behavior experienced a greater percentage decline in depressive and anxiety symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

STAR-VA, a multicomponent intervention, is generally effective across various types of behavioral symptoms associated with dementia.

Preparing Long-Term Care Staff to Meet the Needs of Aging Persons With Serious Mental Illness

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI; schizophrenia spectrum disorders and affective psychoses) are increasingly aging into older adulthood and are overrepresented in residential long-term care settings. The present study aimed to examine the preparedness of staff in these settings to care for individuals with SMI.

DESIGN

A multidisciplinary US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) workgroup of professionals with expertise in geriatric mental health collected voluntary feedback via online questionnaire as part of a quality improvement project.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Respondents were mental health providers (N=51) embedded in VA nursing homes called Community Living Centers (CLCs).

MEASURES

The questionnaire contained multiple-choice, Likert-type scale, and open-ended questions regarding the opportunities and challenges associated with caring for Veterans with SMI in CLCs.

RESULTS

Respondents identified a lack of training of front-line staff as a key challenge in providing high-quality care to residents with SMI. Specifically, respondents indicated a need to increase staff knowledge about SMI symptoms and diagnoses, to improve staff communication and interactions with residents with SMI, and to decrease mental illness stigma among staff.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

The present study revealed significant areas of training need for front-line staff in nursing homes. Many perceived staff training needs overlap with the knowledge and skill set required to provide high-quality dementia care. Integrating training regarding the care of residents with SMI into dementia care training efforts may be a fruitful future direction. Strategies for this and a suggested curriculum are provided.

A staff training intervention to improve communication between people living with dementia and health-care professionals in hospital: the VOICE mixed-methods development and evaluation study

Background

Twenty-five per cent of hospital beds are occupied by a person living with dementia. Dementia affects expressive communication and understanding. Health-care professionals report a lack of communication skills training.

Objectives

To identify teachable, effective strategies for communication between health-care professionals and people living with dementia, and to develop and evaluate a communication skills training course.

Design

We undertook a systematic literature review, video-recorded 41 encounters between staff and people with dementia, and used conversation analysis to investigate communication problems and solutions. We designed a communication skills training course using coproduction and multiple pedagogic approaches. We ran a pilot, followed by six courses for health-care professionals. We measured knowledge, confidence and communication behaviours before, immediately after and 1 month after the course, and undertook interviews with participants and managers. Behaviours were measured using blind-rated videos of simulations.

Setting

General hospital acute geriatric medical wards and two hospital clinical skills centres.

Participants

We video-recorded 26 people with dementia and 26 professionals. Ten experts in dementia care, education, simulation and communication contributed to intervention development. Six health-care professionals took part in a pilot course, and 45 took part in the training.

Results

The literature review identified 26 studies describing 10 communication strategies, with modest evidence of effectiveness. Health-care professional-initiated encounters followed a predictable phase structure. Problems were apparent in requests (with frequent refusals) and in closings. Success was more likely when requests were made directly, with high entitlement (authority to ask) and with lowered contingencies (made to sound less difficult, by minimising the extent or duration of the task, asking patients ‘to try’, offering help or proposing collaborative action). Closings were more successful if the health-care professional announced the end of the task, made a specific arrangement, body language matched talk, and through use of ‘closing idioms’. The training course comprised 2 days, 1 month apart, using experiential learning, including lectures, video workshops, small group discussions, simulations (with specially trained actors) and reflections. We emphasised the incorporation of previous expertise and commitment to person-centred care. Forty-four participants returned for the second training day and 43 provided complete evaluation data. Knowledge and confidence both increased. Some behaviours, especially relating to closings, were more commonly used after training. The course was rated highly in interviews, especially the use of simulations, real-life video clips and interdisciplinary learning. Participants reported that they found the methods useful in practice and were using them 1 month after the course finished.

Limitations

Data were from people with moderate to severe dementia, in an acute hospital, during health-care professional-initiated interactions. Analysis was limited to problems and solutions that were likely to be ‘trainable’. Actors required careful preparation to simulate people with dementia. Communication skills training course participants were volunteers, unlikely to be representative of the general workforce, who displayed high levels of baseline knowledge, confidence and skills. Before-and-after evaluations, and qualitative interviews, are prone to bias.

Conclusions

Requests and closings pose particular difficulties for professionals communicating with people with dementia. We identified solutions to these problems and incorporated them into communication skills training, which improved knowledge, confidence and some communication behaviours. Simulation was an effective training modality.

Future work

Further research should investigate a wider range of health, social care and family carers. Conversation analysis should be used to investigate other aspects of health-care communication.

Study registration

The systematic literature review is registered as CRD42015023437.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Caregiver Burden in Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease: The TEAM-AD VA Cooperative Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) and their association with caregiver burden.

METHODS

Secondary analyses of baseline data from the Trial of Vitamin E and Memantine in Alzheimer's Disease (TEAM-AD) (N=613). Neuropsychiatric Inventory were used to measure severity of NPS and caregiver activity survey to measure caregiver burden.

RESULTS

A total of 87% of patients displayed at least 1 NPS; 70% displayed clinically meaningful NPS. The most common symptoms were apathy (47%), irritability (44%), agitation (42%), and depression (40%). Those with moderate AD had more severe NPS than those with mild AD ( P = .03). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly associated with caregiver time after adjusting for age, education, cognitive function, and comorbidity ( P-value < .0001) with every point increase in NPS associated with a 10-minute increase in caregiver time.

CONCLUSION

Neuropsychiatric symptoms were prevalent in both mild and moderate AD, even in patients receiving treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and were more severe in moderate AD and associated with greater caregiver time.

Assessment of Activities of Daily Living, Self-Care, and Independence

Activities of daily living (ADL) comprise the basic actions that involve caring for one's self and body, including personal care, mobility, and eating. In this review article, we (1) review useful clinical tools including a discussion on ways to approach ADL assessment across settings, (2) highlight relevant literature evaluating the relationship between cognitive functioning and ADLs, (3) discuss other biopsychosocial factors affecting ADL performance, (4) provide clinical recommendations for enhancing ADL capacity with an emphasis on self-care tasks (eating, grooming, dressing, bathing and toileting), and (5) identify interventions that treatment providers can implement to reduce the burden of ADL care.

Agitation and Irritability in Alzheimer's Disease: Evidenced-Based Treatments and the Black-Box Warning

More than five million Americans suffer from Alzheimer's disease (AD), and this number is expected to triple by 2050. While impairments in cognition, particularly memory, are typically the defining features of the clinical syndrome, behavioral symptoms are extremely common, affecting up to 90% of patients. Behavioral symptoms in AD can be difficult to manage and may require a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. The latter is complicated by FDA "black-box warnings" for the medication classes most often used to target these symptoms, and currently there are initiatives in place to limit their use. In this review, we describe common behavioral symptoms of AD-with a particular focus on the challenging symptoms of "agitation" and "irritability"-and discuss evidence-based approaches to their management. Ultimately, multidimensional approaches must be tailored to the patient and their environment, though evidence-based practices should define the treatment of agitation and irritability in AD.