1
|
Buchanan Z, Hopkins SE, Ryman TK, Austin MA, Wiener HW, Tiwari HK, Klejka JA, Boyer BB, Fohner AE. Electronic health record reveals community-level cardiometabolic health benefits associated with 10 years of community-based participatory research. Public Health 2024; 232:38-44. [PMID: 38733959 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While a major goal of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is to improve community health; it is unclear how to measure longstanding success of CBPR. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the impact of ongoing CBPR on cardiometabolic health of participating communities, including in people not directly participating in research. METHODS We used linear mixed-effects modelling with electronic medical records from 2002 to 2012 from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, which provides health care to all Alaska Native people in southwestern Alaska, to compare rates of change in cardiometabolic risk factors between communities that did and did not participate in ongoing CBPR beginning in 2003. RESULTS We analysed 1,262,035 medical records from 12,402 individuals from 10 study and 38 control communities. Blood pressure declined faster in study than in control communities: systolic blood pressure (0.04 mmHg/year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.08); diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (0.07 mmHg/year; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.09). Body mass index increased 0.04 units/year faster in study communities than in control communities (95% CI: 0.03, 0.05). More study visits were associated with faster reduction of DBP and triglyceride levels in study communities. CONCLUSIONS Ongoing CBPR may improve overall cardiometabolic health in communities, perhaps by increasing engagement in health and advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Buchanan
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - S E Hopkins
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Center for Alaska Native Health Research, Fairbanks, AK, USA
| | - T K Ryman
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M A Austin
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - H W Wiener
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Epidemiology, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - H K Tiwari
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Biostatistics, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J A Klejka
- Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Bethel, AK, USA
| | - B B Boyer
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Center for Alaska Native Health Research, Fairbanks, AK, USA
| | - A E Fohner
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kjerland TM, Schroeder S, Tofaeono V. Increased community engagement of Indigenous Peoples in dementia research leads to higher context relevance of results. DEMENTIA 2024; 23:643-668. [PMID: 38445447 PMCID: PMC11059836 DOI: 10.1177/14713012241233651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health research that focuses on Indigenous Peoples must ensure that the community in question is actively engaged, and that the results have context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. Context relevance is "the benefits, usability, and respectful conduct of research from the perspective of Indigenous communities." The purpose of this study was to apply two tools within an already-published scoping review of 76 articles featuring research on cognitive impairment and dementia among Indigenous Peoples worldwide. One tool assessed levels of community engagement reported in the corpus, and the other tool assessed the context relevance of recommendations in the corpus. We hypothesized that research with higher levels of reported community engagement would produce recommendations with greater context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. METHODS We employed semi-structured deductive coding using two novel tools assessing levels of reported community engagement and context relevance of recommendations based on studies included in the existing scoping review. RESULTS Application of the two tools revealed a positive relationship between increasing community engagement and greater context relevance. Community engagement primarily occurred in studies conducted with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations in Canada and with Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Research with Alaska Native, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian Peoples in the USA stood out for its comparative lack of meaningful community engagement. DISCUSSION There is opportunity to utilize these tools, and the results of this assessment, to enhance training and mentorship for researchers who work with Indigenous populations. There is a need to increase investigator capacity to involve communities throughout all phases of research, particularly in the pre-research stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonya M Kjerland
- Department of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lachance L, Brush BL, Mentz G, Lee SYD, Chandanabhumma PP, Coombe CM, DeMajo R, Gabrysiak A, Jensen M, Reyes AG, Rowe Z, Schulz AJ, Wilson-Powers E, Israel BA. Validation of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2024; 51:218-228. [PMID: 38083870 DOI: 10.1177/10901981231213352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Conceptualizing and testing factors that contribute to the success of community-academic partnerships are critical to understanding their contributions to the health and well-being of communities. Most measures to date focus on factors that contribute to the development of new partnerships, and only a few have been adequately tested and validated. Methods. The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and a multiphase process that included the construction and pilot testing of a questionnaire, and a national survey to validate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in long-standing CBPR partnerships (existing ≥ six years). All members within partnerships were recruited to complete the survey (55 partnerships with 563 partners). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha statistics, and a pairwise correlations approach to assess discriminant and convergent validity, and assessed internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Results. All MAPS Questionnaire dimensions demonstrated strong validity and reliability and demonstrated agreement over time. Conclusion. The MAPS Questionnaire includes seven dimensions and 81 items related to the MAPS conceptual model and provides a scientific, in-depth measurement tool that allows long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie Lachance
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Graciela Mentz
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | | | | | - Chris M Coombe
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ricardo DeMajo
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Adena Gabrysiak
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan Jensen
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Angela G Reyes
- Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Amy J Schulz
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Barbara A Israel
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bradford DE, DeFalco A, Perkins ER, Carbajal I, Kwasa J, Goodman FR, Jackson F, Richardson LNS, Woodley N, Neuberger L, Sandoval JA, Huang HJ, Joyner KJ. Whose Signals Are Being Amplified? Toward a More Equitable Clinical Psychophysiology. Clin Psychol Sci 2024; 12:237-252. [PMID: 38645420 PMCID: PMC11028731 DOI: 10.1177/21677026221112117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Research using psychophysiological methods holds great promise for refining clinical assessment, identifying risk factors, and informing treatment. Unfortunately, unique methodological features of existing approaches limit inclusive research participation and, consequently, generalizability. This brief overview and commentary provides a snapshot of the current state of representation in clinical psychophysiology, with a focus on the forms and consequences of ongoing exclusion of Black participants. We illustrate issues of inequity and exclusion that are unique to clinical psychophysiology, considering intersections among social constructions of Blackness and biased design of current technology used to measure electroencephalography, skin conductance, and other signals. We then highlight work by groups dedicated to quantifying and addressing these limitations. We discuss the need for reflection and input from a wider variety of stakeholders to develop and refine new technologies, given the risk of further widening disparities. Finally, we provide broad recommendations for clinical psychophysiology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Iván Carbajal
- Oregon State University, School of Psychological Science
| | - Jasmine Kwasa
- Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
| | - Fallon R. Goodman
- George Washington University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Helen J. Huang
- University of Central Florida, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Buller DB, Sussman AL, Thomson CA, Kepka D, Taren D, Henry KL, Warner EL, Walkosz BJ, Woodall WG, Nuss K, Blair CK, Guest DD, Borrayo EA, Gordon JS, Hatcher J, Wetter DW, Kinsey A, Jones CF, Yung AK, Christini K, Berteletti J, Torres JA, Barraza Perez EY, Small A. #4Corners4Health Social Media Cancer Prevention Campaign for Emerging Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e50392. [PMID: 38386396 PMCID: PMC10921336 DOI: 10.2196/50392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many emerging adults (EAs) are prone to making unhealthy choices, which increase their risk of premature cancer morbidity and mortality. In the era of social media, rigorous research on interventions to promote health behaviors for cancer risk reduction among EAs delivered over social media is limited. Cancer prevention information and recommendations may reach EAs more effectively over social media than in settings such as health care, schools, and workplaces, particularly for EAs residing in rural areas. OBJECTIVE This pragmatic randomized trial aims to evaluate a multirisk factor intervention using a social media campaign designed with community advisers aimed at decreasing cancer risk factors among EAs. The trial will target EAs from diverse backgrounds living in rural counties in the Four Corners states of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. METHODS We will recruit a sample of EAs (n=1000) aged 18 to 26 years residing in rural counties (Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 4 to 9) in the Four Corners states from the Qualtrics' research panel and enroll them in a randomized stepped-wedge, quasi-experimental design. The inclusion criteria include English proficiency and regular social media engagement. A social media intervention will promote guideline-related goals for increased physical activity, healthy eating, and human papillomavirus vaccination and reduced nicotine product use, alcohol intake, and solar UV radiation exposure. Campaign posts will cover digital and media literacy skills, responses to misinformation, communication with family and friends, and referral to community resources. The intervention will be delivered over 12 months in Facebook private groups and will be guided by advisory groups of community stakeholders and EAs and focus groups with EAs. The EAs will complete assessments at baseline and at 12, 26, 39, 52, and 104 weeks after randomization. Assessments will measure 6 cancer risk behaviors, theoretical mediators, and participants' engagement with the social media campaign. RESULTS The trial is in its start-up phase. It is being led by a steering committee. Team members are working in 3 subcommittees to optimize community engagement, the social media intervention, and the measures to be used. The Stakeholder Organization Advisory Board and Emerging Adult Advisory Board were formed and provided initial input on the priority of cancer risk factors to target, social media use by EAs, and community resources available. A framework for the social media campaign with topics, format, and theoretical mediators has been created, along with protocols for campaign management. CONCLUSIONS Social media can be used as a platform to counter misinformation and improve reliable health information to promote health behaviors that reduce cancer risks among EAs. Because of the popularity of web-based information sources among EAs, an innovative, multirisk factor intervention using a social media campaign has the potential to reduce their cancer risk behaviors. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05618158; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05618158. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/50392.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew L Sussman
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Cynthia A Thomson
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Deanna Kepka
- College of Nursing and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Douglas Taren
- Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kimberly L Henry
- Department of Psychology, College of Natural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - Echo L Warner
- College of Nursing and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | | | - Kayla Nuss
- Klein Buendel, Golden, CO, United States
| | - Cindy K Blair
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Dolores D Guest
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Evelinn A Borrayo
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Judith S Gordon
- College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - Christopher F Jones
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Angela K Yung
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Kaila Christini
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - John A Torres
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mrklas KJ, Boyd JM, Shergill S, Merali S, Khan M, Moser C, Nowell L, Goertzen A, Swain L, Pfadenhauer LM, Sibley KM, Vis-Dunbar M, Hill MD, Raffin-Bouchal S, Tonelli M, Graham ID. A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:139. [PMID: 38129871 PMCID: PMC10740226 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00958-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health research partnership approaches have grown in popularity over the past decade, but the systematic evaluation of their outcomes and impacts has not kept equal pace. Identifying partnership assessment tools and key partnership characteristics is needed to advance partnerships, partnership measurement, and the assessment of their outcomes and impacts through systematic study. OBJECTIVE To locate and identify globally available tools for assessing the outcomes and impacts of health research partnerships. METHODS We searched four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL + , PsychINFO) with an a priori strategy from inception to June 2021, without limits. We screened studies independently and in duplicate, keeping only those involving a health research partnership and the development, use and/or assessment of tools to evaluate partnership outcomes and impacts. Reviewer disagreements were resolved by consensus. Study, tool and partnership characteristics, and emerging research questions, gaps and key recommendations were synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS We screened 36 027 de-duplicated citations, reviewed 2784 papers in full text, and kept 166 studies and three companion reports. Most studies originated in North America and were published in English after 2015. Most of the 205 tools we identified were questionnaires and surveys targeting researchers, patients and public/community members. While tools were comprehensive and usable, most were designed for single use and lacked validity or reliability evidence. Challenges associated with the interchange and definition of terms (i.e., outcomes, impacts, tool type) were common and may obscure partnership measurement and comparison. Very few of the tools identified in this study overlapped with tools identified by other, similar reviews. Partnership tool development, refinement and evaluation, including tool measurement and optimization, are key areas for future tools-related research. CONCLUSION This large scoping review identified numerous, single-use tools that require further development and testing to improve their psychometric and scientific qualities. The review also confirmed that the health partnership research domain and its measurement tools are still nascent and actively evolving. Dedicated efforts and resources are required to better understand health research partnerships, partnership optimization and partnership measurement and evaluation using valid, reliable and practical tools that meet partners' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly J Mrklas
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3D10-3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
- Strategic Clinical Networks™, Provincial Clinical Excellence, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Jamie M Boyd
- Knowledge Translation Program, St Michael's Hospital, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sumair Shergill
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sera Merali
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Masood Khan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Cheryl Moser
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Lorelli Nowell
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Amelia Goertzen
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Liam Swain
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3D10-3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Lisa M Pfadenhauer
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, and Epidemiology-IBE, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathryn M Sibley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3D10-3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Medicine and Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Marcello Tonelli
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Office of the Vice-President (Research), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Schools of Epidemiology and Public Health and Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Glaser KM, Dauphin C, Johnson D, Harris N, Crabtree-Ide CR, Bouchard EG. Advancing community-academic partnerships to achieve breast health equity: Applying the community-based participatory model to build capacity for sustained impact. Cancer 2023; 129:3162-3170. [PMID: 37691523 PMCID: PMC10513749 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This formative study leveraged a community-academic partnership to identify barriers to care that are potential sources of breast cancer disparities in Black women. Through this partnership and using a community-based participatory research approach, the objective was to develop a community task force to inform future interventions aimed at addressing breast cancer disparities and increasing health equity. METHODS The authors assessed gaps in care related to breast cancer in Buffalo, New York, by collecting and analyzing qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with breast cancer survivors and breast navigation groups assessing barriers and facilitators across the cancer care continuum. Then, community-based participatory research approaches were used to build a task force to develop an action plan addressing gaps in care. RESULTS The authors conducted a thematic analysis of qualitative findings to understand barriers and facilitators to cancer care. Three main domains of themes emerged, including medical mistrust, fear, and stigma; the importance of patient navigation as a form of social support; and the importance of faith and faith-based community. Finally, the findings were presented to a newly formed community task force to validate the data collected and set future priorities to address breast cancer disparities and increase breast health equity in the region. CONCLUSIONS The authors observed that health equity is a critically important issue in cancer care and that developing culturally tailored interventions has the potential to improve care delivery and reduce breast cancer disparities. Learning from and working with community members helps set the future agenda related to health equity. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Our overall goal was to assess gaps in breast cancer care in Buffalo, New York, and to use community-based participatory approaches to build a task force to work toward breast health equity. Recent and historical data indicate that the Western New York community is facing a continued wide gap in breast cancer mortality trends between Black and White patients. We collected qualitative data to understand potential sources of inequity related to breast cancer and presented findings to a community task force to set future priorities for addressing breast cancer disparities and increasing breast health equity in our region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M. Glaser
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Cassy Dauphin
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- The National Witness Project, Inc., Buffalo, New York
| | - Detric Johnson
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- The National Witness Project, Inc., Buffalo, New York
| | - Narseary Harris
- The National Witness Project, Inc., Buffalo, New York
- First Ladies of Western New York, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Elizabeth G. Bouchard
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Birgel V, Decker L, Röding D, Walter U. Community capacity for prevention and health promotion: a scoping review on underlying domains and assessment methods. Syst Rev 2023; 12:147. [PMID: 37608344 PMCID: PMC10464111 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Building community capacity is an essential health promotion approach, which refers to the characteristics of communities that affect their ability to identify and address social and public health problems. Despite general agreement about certain capacity domains and frameworks, there is no comprehensive and consistent assessment of community capacity. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to identify the domains and methods used to assess community capacity related to community-based prevention and health promotion. METHODS A scoping search was performed on 06/02/2022 via PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct, with supplemental searches via Google Scholar. The review included studies published in English from 1990 to 2022 that explicitly described how community capacity was assessed in health promotion and prevention interventions. Furthermore, studies had to meet at least two of the three following criteria for capacity assessment: a theoretical foundation, a participatory approach, or a field test of the assessment tool. RESULTS From 4779 records, 38 studies were included after applying exclusion criteria. Nineteen studies used mixed, eleven qualitative and eight quantitative methods to assess community capacity. The various domains used to assess community capacity were identified and reassembled into nine comprehensive domains: community participation, knowledge and skills, resources, leadership, community power, sense of community, collaboration, critical awareness and problem-solving, and community structure. The review also identified four sub-domains, which include commitment, communication, shared values and goals, and sustainability. DISCUSSION This scoping review provides an overview of the domains and methods used to assess community capacity, which can facilitate the development of a comprehensive approach to capacity assessment in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Birgel
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
| | - Lea Decker
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Dominik Röding
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Ulla Walter
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Willmott TJ, Mathew A, Saleme P, Rundle-Thiele S. Participatory Design Application in Youth Sexual Violence and Abuse Prevention: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. TRAUMA, VIOLENCE & ABUSE 2023; 24:1797-1817. [PMID: 35293245 DOI: 10.1177/15248380221078891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Youth sexual violence and abuse (SVA) are leading public health and human rights issues around the world. Prevention is key to reducing SVA rates and minimising resultant harms. Despite advocacy for more collaborative approaches, knowledge of how to effectively engage young people and key stakeholders in the design, implementation, and evaluation of SVA prevention programs is limited. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to synthesise available evidence on participatory design (PD) application in primary and secondary SVA prevention targeting young people. A systematic search was executed across seven electronic databases. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English, reported primary or secondary SVA prevention, described application of PD or a related approach, and targeted young people aged 12-25 years. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Overall, 20 articles reporting 15 studies were included. Most (55%; n = 11) employed a qualitative design. Descriptions, methods, and scope of PD application varied across included studies. A lack of empirical evaluations prevented conclusions regarding the utility of PD application in terms of measured outcomes. The methodology, agent of change, training, and engagement (MATE) taxonomy was subsequently developed to describe and classify PD application. As illustrated in the MATE taxonomy, PD methods promoting agency, encouraging input, and facilitating empowerment are likely to facilitate more meaningful engagement of participants. Integration of participant and expert views, community consultation, and appropriate socio-cultural adaption appear to be critical determinants of program acceptability and feasibility. Empirical evaluations are needed to assess the relative utility of PD methods in line with SVA prevention objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alieena Mathew
- Social Marketing @ Griffith, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - Pamela Saleme
- Social Marketing @ Griffith, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dubé K, Peterson B, Jones NL, Onorato A, Carter WB, Dannaway C, Johnson S, Hayes R, Hill M, Maddox R, Riley JL, Shull J, Metzger D, Montaner LJ. Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:39. [PMID: 37291622 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00449-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Achieving effective community engagement has been an objective of U.S. National Institutes of Health-funded HIV research efforts, including participation of persons with HIV. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have remained the predominant model for community engagement since their creation in 1989. As HIV cure-directed research efforts have grown into larger academic-industry partnerships directing resources toward both basic and clinical research under the Martin Delaney Collaboratories (MDC), community input models have also evolved. The BEAT-HIV MDC Collaboratory, based at The Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, United States, implemented a three-part model for community engagement that has shown success in providing greater impact for community engagement across basic, biomedical, and social sciences research efforts. DISCUSSION In this paper, we review the case study of the formation of the BEAT-HIV Community Engagement Group (CEG) model, starting with the historical partnership between The Wistar Institute as a basic research center and Philadelphia FIGHT as a not-for-profit community-based organization (CBO), and culminating with the growth of community engagement under the BEAT-HIV MDC. Second, we present the impact of a cooperative structure including a Community Advisory Board (CAB), CBO, and researchers through the BEAT-HIV CEG model, and highlight collaborative projects that demonstrate the potential strengths, challenges, and opportunities of this model. We also describe challenges and future opportunities for the use of the CEG model. CONCLUSIONS Our CEG model integrating a CBO, CAB and scientists could help move us towards the goal of effective, equitable and ethical engagement in HIV cure-directed research. In sharing our lessons learned, challenges and growing pains, we contribute to the science of community engagement into biomedical research efforts with an emphasis on HIV cure-directed research. Our documented experience with implementing the CEG supports greater discussion and independent implementation efforts for this model to engage communities into working teams in a way we find a meaningful, ethical, and sustainable model in support of basic, clinical/biomedical, social sciences and ethics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Beth Peterson
- Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Room 480, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nora L Jones
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Onorato
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William B Carter
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christine Dannaway
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Johnson
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roy Hayes
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marcus Hill
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rease Maddox
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James L Riley
- Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jane Shull
- Philadelphia FIGHT Community Health Centers, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Metzger
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luis J Montaner
- Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Room 480, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wieland ML, Njeru JW, Weis JA, Lohr A, Nigon JA, Goodson M, Osman A, Molina L, Ahmed Y, Capetillo GP, Nur O, Sia IG. Rochester Healthy Community Partnership: Then and now. Front Public Health 2023; 10:1090131. [PMID: 36703848 PMCID: PMC9871468 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1090131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Community-engaged research partnerships promote health equity through incorporation of regional contexts to inform partnership dynamics that shape research and interventions that reflect community voice and priorities. Long-term partnerships build trusted relationships and promote capacity building among community and academic partners, but there are many structural barriers to sustaining long-term partnerships. Here we describe lessons learned from sustaining Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP), an 18-year community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership in Southeast Minnesota. RHCP collaborates with immigrant and refugee populations to co-create interventions that promote health equity for community health priorities. Challenges to sustainability include a tension between project-based funding and the needs of long-term community-based research infrastructure. These challenges can be met with a focus on shared CBPR principles, operating norms, partnership dynamics, and governance. RHCP began in 2004 through identification of a community health priority, defining the community, and establishment of CBPR principles. It grew through identification of broader community health priorities, capacity building for community and academic partners, and integration of diverse learners. We describe the capacity for RHCP to respond to new societal contexts, the importance of partnership dynamics as a barometer for partnership health, and lessons learned about sustainability of the CBPR partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L. Wieland
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States,Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,*Correspondence: Mark L. Wieland ✉
| | - Jane W. Njeru
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States,Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jennifer A. Weis
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Abby Lohr
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States,Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Julie A. Nigon
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Hawthorne Education Center, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Miriam Goodson
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Alliance of Chicanos, Hispanics, and Latin Americans, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ahmed Osman
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Intercultural Mutual Assistance Association, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Luz Molina
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Yahye Ahmed
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Somali American Social Service Association, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Graciela Porraz Capetillo
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Omar Nur
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Somali American Social Service Association, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Irene G. Sia
- Rochester Healthy Community Partnership, Rochester, MN, United States,Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mrklas KJ, Boyd JM, Shergill S, Merali S, Khan M, Nowell L, Goertzen A, Pfadenhauer LM, Paul K, Sibley KM, Swain L, Vis-Dunbar M, Hill MD, Raffin-Bouchal S, Tonelli M, Graham ID. Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:3. [PMID: 36604697 PMCID: PMC9817421 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00937-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and assess the globally available valid, reliable and acceptable tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus and PsycINFO from origin to 2 June 2021, without limits, using an a priori strategy and registered protocol. We screened citations independently and in duplicate, resolving discrepancies by consensus and retaining studies involving health research partnerships, the development, use and/or assessment of tools to evaluate partnership outcomes and impacts, and reporting empirical psychometric evidence. Study, tool, psychometric and pragmatic characteristics were abstracted using a hybrid approach, then synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Study quality was assessed using the quality of survey studies in psychology (Q-SSP) checklist. RESULTS From 56 123 total citations, we screened 36 027 citations, assessed 2784 full-text papers, abstracted data from 48 studies and one companion report, and identified 58 tools. Most tools comprised surveys, questionnaires and scales. Studies used cross-sectional or mixed-method/embedded survey designs and employed quantitative and mixed methods. Both studies and tools were conceptually well grounded, focusing mainly on outcomes, then process, and less frequently on impact measurement. Multiple forms of empirical validity and reliability evidence was present for most tools; however, psychometric characteristics were inconsistently assessed and reported. We identified a subset of studies (22) and accompanying tools distinguished by their empirical psychometric, pragmatic and study quality characteristics. While our review demonstrated psychometric and pragmatic improvements over previous reviews, challenges related to health research partnership assessment and the nascency of partnership science persist. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified multiple tools demonstrating empirical psychometric evidence, pragmatic strength and moderate study quality. Increased attention to psychometric and pragmatic requirements in tool development, testing and reporting is key to advancing health research partnership assessment and partnership science. PROSPERO CRD42021137932.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. J. Mrklas
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3D10, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
- Strategic Clinical Networks™, Provincial Clinical Excellence, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - J. M. Boyd
- Knowledge Translation Program, St Michael’s Hospital, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - S. Shergill
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - S. Merali
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - M. Khan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
| | - L. Nowell
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - A. Goertzen
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - L. M. Pfadenhauer
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology–IBE, Ludwig-Maximilian Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - K. Paul
- University of Calgary Summer Studentships Program, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - K. M. Sibley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
| | - L. Swain
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3D10, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - M. Vis-Dunbar
- University of British Columbia - Okanagan, Kelowna, BC Canada
| | - M. D. Hill
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3D10, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Medicine and Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | | | - M. Tonelli
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
- Office of the Vice-President (Research), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - I. D. Graham
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health & School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Naing C, Htet NH, Aung HH, Whittaker MA. Community engagement in health services research on elimination of lymphatic filariasis: A systematic review. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001226. [PMID: 36963022 PMCID: PMC10021320 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to contextualize the extent, nature, and quality of community engagement in health services research on eliminating lymphatic filariasis in low-and middle-income countries of Southeast Asia and Pacific Region. We performed a systematic review, and the results were reported according to the PRISMA-S checklist. Relevant studies were searched in health-related electronic databases, and selected according to the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies with various study designs were identified. The majority (68%) were conducted in India. Lay people, community leaders, and volunteers were the most common groups of community members (12/16,75%). Overall, the majority (13/16, 81%) were at the 'moderate level' of engagement in research context mainly by 'collaboration' in 'developing methodology' 'collaboration' in data collection and 'collaboration' for 'dissemination of findings. The common barriers to the community engagement were lack of involvement of participating bodies and technology-related issues. In conclusion, the insufficient description of the community engagement process in the studies limits a deeper understanding and analysis of the issue. Future well-designed prospective studies with attention to the description of mechanisms of engagement, facilitating the whole process and reporting the community level outcome are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cho Naing
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Norah Htet Htet
- School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Htar Htar Aung
- School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Maxine A Whittaker
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mrklas KJ, Merali S, Khan M, Shergill S, Boyd JM, Nowell L, Pfadenhauer LM, Paul K, Goertzen A, Swain L, Sibley KM, Vis-Dunbar M, Hill MD, Raffin-Bouchal S, Tonelli M, Graham ID. How are health research partnerships assessed? A systematic review of outcomes, impacts, terminology and the use of theories, models and frameworks. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:133. [DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00938-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Accurate, consistent assessment of outcomes and impacts is challenging in the health research partnerships domain. Increased focus on tool quality, including conceptual, psychometric and pragmatic characteristics, could improve the quantification, measurement and reporting partnership outcomes and impacts. This cascading review was undertaken as part of a coordinated, multicentre effort to identify, synthesize and assess a vast body of health research partnership literature.
Objective
To systematically assess the outcomes and impacts of health research partnerships, relevant terminology and the type/use of theories, models and frameworks (TMF) arising from studies using partnership assessment tools with known conceptual, psychometric and pragmatic characteristics.
Methods
Four electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus and PsycINFO) from inception to 2 June 2021. We retained studies containing partnership evaluation tools with (1) conceptual foundations (reference to TMF), (2) empirical, quantitative psychometric evidence (evidence of validity and reliability, at minimum) and (3) one or more pragmatic characteristics. Outcomes, impacts, terminology, definitions and TMF type/use were abstracted verbatim from eligible studies using a hybrid (independent abstraction–validation) approach and synthesized using summary statistics (quantitative), inductive thematic analysis and deductive categories (qualitative). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSDD).
Results
Application of inclusion criteria yielded 37 eligible studies. Study quality scores were high (mean 80%, standard deviation 0.11%) but revealed needed improvements (i.e. methodological, reporting, user involvement in research design). Only 14 (38%) studies reported 48 partnership outcomes and 55 impacts; most were positive effects (43, 90% and 47, 89%, respectively). Most outcomes were positive personal, functional, structural and contextual effects; most impacts were personal, functional and contextual in nature. Most terms described outcomes (39, 89%), and 30 of 44 outcomes/impacts terms were unique, but few were explicitly defined (9, 20%). Terms were complex and mixed on one or more dimensions (e.g. type, temporality, stage, perspective). Most studies made explicit use of study-related TMF (34, 92%). There were 138 unique TMF sources, and these informed tool construct type/choice and hypothesis testing in almost all cases (36, 97%).
Conclusion
This study synthesized partnership outcomes and impacts, deconstructed term complexities and evolved our understanding of TMF use in tool development, testing and refinement studies. Renewed attention to basic concepts is necessary to advance partnership measurement and research innovation in the field.
Systematic review protocol registration: PROSPERO protocol registration: CRD42021137932 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=137932.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lo Hog Tian JM, Watson JR, Deyman M, Tran B, Kerber P, Nanami K, Norris D, Samson K, Cioppa L, Murphy M, Mcgee A, Ajiboye M, Chambers LA, Worthington C, Rourke SB. Building capacity in quantitative research and data storytelling to enhance knowledge translation: a training curriculum for peer researchers. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2022; 8:69. [PMID: 36474277 PMCID: PMC9724271 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00390-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many community-based HIV research studies incorporate principles of greater involvement and meaningful engagement of people living with HIV (GIPA/MEPA) by training people with HIV as peer researchers. Unfortunately, there are still some aspects of research (e.g., quantitative data analysis and interpretation) where many projects fall short in realizing GIPA/MEPA principles. To address these gaps, we developed an eight-week training course that aimed to build the capacity of peer researchers around the understanding and interpretation of quantitative data and incorporating lived experience to increase the impact of the knowledge transfer and exchange phase of a study. METHODS Peer researchers (n = 8) participated from British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario and lessons learned from the training were implemented throughout the dissemination of research findings from the People Living with HIV Stigma Index study. This paper presents the curriculum and main training components, course evaluation results, and challenges and lessons learned. The manuscript was created in collaboration with and includes the perspectives of both the peer researchers involved in the training, as well the course facilitators. RESULTS Throughout the course, peer researchers' self-assessed knowledge and understanding of quantitative research and data storytelling improved and, through interactive activities and practice, they gained the confidence to deliver a full research presentation. This improved their understanding of research findings, which was beneficial for discussing results with community partners and study participants. The peer researchers also agreed that learning about integrating lived experience with quantitative data has helped them to make research findings more relatable and convey key messages in a more meaningful way. CONCLUSIONS Our training curriculum provides a template for research teams to build capacity in areas of research where peer researchers and community members are less often engaged. In doing so, we continue to uphold the principles of GIPA/MEPA and enhance the translation of research knowledge in communities most greatly affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Lo Hog Tian
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - James R Watson
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Megan Deyman
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Billy Tran
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Kerber
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kajiko Nanami
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Deborah Norris
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kim Samson
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lynne Cioppa
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Murphy
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Mcgee
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Monisola Ajiboye
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lori A Chambers
- Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Sean B Rourke
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jones M, Hoague D, Spriggs R, Catalan E, Adams N, Watkins T, Tripati A, Norris KC. Establishing a Framework for Sustainable Community Action Research. Ethn Dis 2022; 32:333-340. [PMID: 36388858 PMCID: PMC9590601 DOI: 10.18865/ed.32.4.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Community-based participatory research/community-partnered participatory research (CBPR/CPRR) is viewed as a critical approach for improving health and addressing inequities found in under-resourced communities by pairing community partners and academic partners to address health and environmental concerns. This article aims to amplify the potential of the current CBPR/CPPR models through insights learned from the underserved community of Watts in south central Los Angeles. We discuss our framework that shifts the primary academic focus in the community-academia partnership from individual investigators and/or research groups to the academic institution to generate sustainable partnerships. We summarize the Community Action Research Engagement (CARE) Framework as a new set of recommended tenets to expand CBPR/CPPR. This framework can provide guidance for how universities can catalyze: 1) building trust; 2) facilitating knowledge; 3) advancing solutions; and 4) fostering mentorship in the context of leveraging a university's position to address the root causes of community inequities and thus create more sustained partnerships that achieve greater impact within their surrounding communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Jones
- Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Address correspondence to Malcom Jones, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA;
| | - Danielle Hoague
- Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Raenita Spriggs
- Center for Diverse Leadership in Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elijah Catalan
- Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Naomi Adams
- Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Timothy Watkins
- Watts Labor Community Action Committee, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aradhna Tripati
- Center for Diverse Leadership in Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Keith C. Norris
- Division of General Internal Medicine-Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Munson MR, Raghavan R, Shimizu R, Rodwin AH, Jaccard J. Methodologies to Advance a "Science of How": Identifying and Engaging Intervention Targets and Outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:1039-1046. [PMID: 35172593 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although implementation science has taken hold in many areas of psychiatric services research, a need remains for developing effective, low-cost interventions for specific subpopulations with mental health conditions. The experimental therapeutics approach has gained momentum as a framework for developing effective interventions. However, few studies have taken steps to rigorously apply experimental therapeutics. This article provides a blueprint for applying this approach. METHODS A focused literature review was conducted to document the frequency of the application of experimental therapeutics among articles published between 2011 and 2021 in some of the American Psychiatric Association's journals. Independently of the review, the authors delineated a four-component approach for applying experimental therapeutics in research and present practical, innovative strategies to advance psychiatric services research. RESULTS The four-component approach includes outlining prerequisites, identifying target mechanisms, proposing intervention strategies to address target mechanisms, and using advanced analytic methods. The strategies described for each component are not exhaustive; rather, they suggest promising avenues for research that can lead to more effective interventions and deeper understanding of how, and for whom, an intervention works. CONCLUSIONS The application of experimental therapeutics in psychiatric services research can lead to increased development, refinement, and implementation of effective interventions for specific populations or conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Munson
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (Munson, Raghavan, Rodwin, Jaccard); School of Social Work, University of Alaska, Anchorage (Shimizu)
| | - Ramesh Raghavan
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (Munson, Raghavan, Rodwin, Jaccard); School of Social Work, University of Alaska, Anchorage (Shimizu)
| | - Rei Shimizu
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (Munson, Raghavan, Rodwin, Jaccard); School of Social Work, University of Alaska, Anchorage (Shimizu)
| | - Aaron H Rodwin
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (Munson, Raghavan, Rodwin, Jaccard); School of Social Work, University of Alaska, Anchorage (Shimizu)
| | - James Jaccard
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (Munson, Raghavan, Rodwin, Jaccard); School of Social Work, University of Alaska, Anchorage (Shimizu)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Personalized Medicine for the Critically Ill Patient: A Narrative Review. Processes (Basel) 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/pr10061200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized Medicine (PM) is rapidly advancing in everyday medical practice. Technological advances allow researchers to reach patients more than ever with their discoveries. The critically ill patient is probably the most complex of all, and personalized medicine must make serious efforts to fulfill the desire to “treat the individual, not the disease”. The complexity of critically ill pathologies arises from the severe state these patients and from the deranged pathways of their diseases. PM constitutes the integration of basic research into clinical practice; however, to make this possible complex and voluminous data require processing through even more complex mathematical models. The result of processing biodata is a digitized individual, from which fragments of information can be extracted for specific purposes. With this review, we aim to describe the current state of PM technologies and methods and explore its application in critically ill patients, as well as some of the challenges associated with PM in intensive care from the perspective of economic, approval, and ethical issues. This review can help in understanding the complexity of, P.M.; the complex processes needed for its application in critically ill patients, the benefits that make the effort of implementation worthwhile, and the current challenges of PM.
Collapse
|
19
|
Merker VL, Hyde JK, Herbst A, Solch AK, Mohr DC, Gaj L, Dvorin K, Dryden EM. Evaluating the Impacts of Patient Engagement on Health Services Research Teams: Lessons from the Veteran Consulting Network. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:33-41. [PMID: 35349028 PMCID: PMC8993982 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06987-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increasing commitment to patient engagement in research, evaluation of the impact of these efforts on research processes, products, and teams is limited. OBJECTIVE To explore the impacts of engaging patients as consultants to research studies by examining the experiences, impacts, and lessons learned from a program facilitating patient engagement at a Veterans Health Administration research center. DESIGN We developed a logic model to articulate the activities being implemented to support patient engagement and their anticipated outcomes. Then, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with participants in the local Veteran Consulting Network to qualitatively explore these outcomes. PARTICIPANTS Twelve researchers and eleven Veteran patients with experience working on at least one grant or funded study. APPROACH Interview transcripts were inductively coded using a consensus-based approach. Findings were synthesized using framework analysis and mapped back onto our logic model of expected patient engagement impacts. KEY RESULTS Patient engagement improved the perceived quality and relevance of research studies as patient consultants challenged researchers' assumptions about patient populations and clinical contexts and gave feedback that helped improve the feasibility of proposed grants, readability of study materials, comprehensiveness of study assessments, and cultural sensitivity and relevance of interventions. Patient engagement also had personal benefits to researchers and patients. Researchers reported improved communication skills and higher job satisfaction. Patients reported a sense of purpose and satisfaction from their work with greater awareness of and appreciation for research. CONCLUSIONS Engaging patients in research can have multiple benefits to the people and work involved. Our evaluation process can serve as a template for other organizations to plan for and assess the impact of their own patient engagement programs. Creating logic models and updating them based on feedback from program users make engagement goals explicit, help verify expected mechanisms to achieve impact, and facilitate organizational learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Merker
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA. .,Department of Neurology and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, Boston, USA.
| | - Justeen K Hyde
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Abigail Herbst
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Amanda K Solch
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center of Helathcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, USA
| | - Lauren Gaj
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Kelly Dvorin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Eileen M Dryden
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Adler RR, Smith RN, Fowler KJ, Gates J, Jefferson NM, Adler JT, Patzer RE. Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR): An Underutilized Approach to Address Surgical Disparities. Ann Surg 2022; 275:496-499. [PMID: 34913903 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Disparities are well-documented across the continuum of surgical care. Counteracting such disparities requires new multidisciplinary approaches that utilize the expertise of affected individuals, such as community-based participatory research (CBPR). CBPR is an approach to research that is anchored in equitable, sustainable community-academic partnerships, and has been shown to improve intervention implementation and outcomes. In this article, community stakeholders and researchers outline the principles and benefits of CBPR, examples of CBPR in trauma and transplant, and future directions for CBPR within surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel R Adler
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Randi N Smith
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Rachel E Patzer
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Farmer N, Osei Baah F, Williams F, Ortiz-Chapparo E, Mitchell VM, Jackson L, Collins B, Graham L, Wallen GR, Powell-Wiley TM, Johnson A. Use of a community advisory board to build equitable algorithms for participation in clinical trials: a protocol paper for HoPeNET. BMJ Health Care Inform 2022; 29:bmjhci-2021-100453. [PMID: 35185011 PMCID: PMC8860013 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Participation from racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials has been burdened by issues surrounding mistrust and access to healthcare. There is emerging use of machine learning (ML) in clinical trial recruitment and evaluation. However, for individuals from groups who are recipients of societal biases, utilisation of ML can lead to the creation and use of biased algorithms. To minimise bias, the design of equitable ML tools that advance health equity could be guided by community engagement processes. The Howard University Partnership with the National Institutes of Health for Equitable Clinical Trial Participation for Racial/Ethnic Communities Underrepresented in Research (HoPeNET) seeks to create an ML-based infrastructure from community advisory board (CAB) experiences to enhance participation of African-Americans/Blacks in clinical trials. Methods and analysis This triphased cross-sectional study (24 months, n=56) will create a CAB of community members and research investigators. The three phases of the study include: (1) identification of perceived barriers/facilitators to clinical trial engagement through qualitative/quantitative methods and systems-based model building participation; (2) operation of CAB meetings and (3) development of a predictive ML tool and outcome evaluation. Identified predictors from the participant-derived systems-based map will be used for the ML tool development. Ethics and dissemination We anticipate minimum risk for participants. Institutional review board approval and informed consent has been obtained and patient confidentiality ensured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Farmer
- Translational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Foster Osei Baah
- Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Erika Ortiz-Chapparo
- Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Valerie M Mitchell
- Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Latifa Jackson
- Department of Pediatrics, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Billy Collins
- Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lennox Graham
- Department of Health Sciences and Management, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Howard Unversity, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Gwenyth R Wallen
- Translational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Tiffany M Powell-Wiley
- Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA .,Intramural Research Program, NIMHD, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Allan Johnson
- Department of Nurtritional Sciences, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wray RJ, Nicks SE, Adsul P, Elliot M, Enard K, Jupka K, Trainer AK, Hansen N, Shahid M, Wright-Jones R, Siddiqui S. Promoting informed prostate cancer screening decision-making for African American men in a community-based setting. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:503-514. [PMID: 35091864 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01544-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current screening guidelines for prostate cancer (PCa) encourage men to make individual screening decisions after consulting with their primary care provider to weigh the risks and benefits of undergoing prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, but many men at high risk of PCa diagnosis (notably African American men) are more likely to be uninsured and lack a primary care provider. An academic-community partnership redesigned its community-based screening program to ensure access to services for African American men, incorporating a session with a trained clinical educator in community settings, designed to increase knowledge and promote informed decision-making regarding PSA testing. This study evaluated effects of the intervention on decision-making outcomes. METHODS To evaluate program efficacy, 88 men completed pre- and post-test surveys assessing outcomes of interest. RESULTS Participants' knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, anxiety levels, and self-efficacy all improved from pre- to post-test at a statistically significant level. Most notably participants' awareness that PCa is often not life-threatening, and watchful waiting is a reasonable treatment option increased after the encounter. More than half of the study sample felt they had received enough knowledge to make an informed decision about whether the PSA test was right for them. CONCLUSION Our findings show the program had positive effects on men's ability to make informed decisions about PCa screening and demonstrate that educational outreach programs with an emphasis on informed decision-making can effectively balance screening guidelines with the needs of underserved populations in community settings to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo J Wray
- Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shannon E Nicks
- Center for Health Equity, Dayton Children's Hospital, Dayton, OH, USA.
| | - Prajakta Adsul
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Michael Elliot
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kimberly Enard
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Keri Jupka
- College of Nursing, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Natasha Hansen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | | | | | - Sameer Siddiqui
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Health Promot Int 2022; 37:ii97-ii108. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Health Promot Int 2022; 37:ii1-ii6. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
25
|
Hamann CJ, Daly E, Schwab-Reese L, Askelson N, Peek-Asa C. Community engagement in the development and implementation of a rural road safety campaign: Steps and lessons learned. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH 2021; 23:10.1016/j.jth.2021.101282. [PMID: 35937507 PMCID: PMC9348780 DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rural crashes result in fatality rates twice as high as urban, after accounting for vehicle miles traveled, and those involving farm vehicles tend to be the most severe. Farm vehicle crash interventions have focused on the farm equipment (e.g., lighting and marking) or the farm vehicle operator (e.g., training), despite crashes being most frequently caused by other vehicle driver actions. Community-based campaigns focused on rural drivers have potential to influence driver behavior. The objective of this study was to describe the role, formation, and lessons learned from a community advisory board (CAB) in the development and dissemination of a community-based rural roadway safety campaign. METHODS The CAB provided campaign input through quarterly meetings and email. The campaign had three main CAB and crash data-informed messages: 1) Slow Down, 2) Leave More Space, and 3) Avoid Passing. The CAB led campaign activities to publicize the message, distribute swag, and organize event logistics. To evaluate CAB effectiveness and inform future community engagement efforts, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews with CAB members in July 2020. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and codes were categorized into five main themes. RESULTS Overall, CAB membership was described as an overwhelmingly positive experience in terms of the CAB structure, culture fostered among the group, responsibilities, and time commitment. Board members reported successful campaign implementation, gave positive feedback regarding the research team's engagement efforts, and provided valuable recommendations for future campaigns (e.g., adding social media components, expansion of CAB age and industry diversity, and increasing group bonding activities). CONCLUSIONS Results from this study demonstrate the instrumental role and logistics involved in engagement of community advisors for the development and implementation of a rural roadway safety campaign. Steps and lessons from this study can be applied to other community-level injury and violence prevention topics, with a particular focus on rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara J. Hamann
- University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center, 145 N. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
- University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 145 N. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Eliza Daly
- University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, 145 N. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Laura Schwab-Reese
- Purdue University College of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Public Health, Matthews Hall, 812 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Natoshia Askelson
- University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, 145 N. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Corinne Peek-Asa
- University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center, 145 N. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
- University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, 145 N. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ibrahim AF, Tan MP, Teoh GK, Muda SM, Chong MC. Health Benefits of Social Participation Interventions among Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Review Article. Exp Aging Res 2021; 48:234-260. [PMID: 34229584 DOI: 10.1080/0361073x.2021.1939563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social disengagement among older persons may result from accumulated physical impact and social stressors experienced throughout life. Conversely, interventions that enhance social participation addresses social isolation with positive influences on health. This article, therefore, aimed to review the range of published studies that evaluated the health benefits of interventions on social participation among community-dwelling older persons. METHOD We conducted a search using the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, PubMed, ProQuest, SAGE, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Web of Science, and Open repository/archive. RESULTS Twenty-five studies from Asia, Europe and America were selected. Included articles described randomized controlled trials (9), quasi-experimental studies (9), mixed-methods studies (2), participatory action research (3), and community-based intervention research (2). Social interventions described are group or cultural activities, personal/group monitoring and discussion, and communications devices. Intervention designed utilized theories, models, concepts, principles, and evidence from published literature. CONCLUSION Most social intervention studies evaluating health outcomes have been conducted in North America and Western Europe. Group-based activities were most commonly employed, but personal/group discussions, home visits and technology-based interactions have also been used. While social isolation is now a widely accepted risk factor for ill-health, research evidence for improvement of health through reduction of social isolation remains limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirah Fatin Ibrahim
- Ageing and Age-Associated Disorders Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Nursing, International Islamic University of Malaysia, Pahang, Malaysia
| | - Maw Pin Tan
- Ageing and Age-Associated Disorders Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Gaik Kin Teoh
- Ageing and Age-Associated Disorders Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Psychology, School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Siti Mariam Muda
- Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Nursing, International Islamic University of Malaysia, Pahang, Malaysia
| | - Mei Chan Chong
- Ageing and Age-Associated Disorders Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mosavel M, Ferrell D, LaRose JG, Lu J, Winship J. Conducting a Community "Street Survey" to Inform an Obesity Intervention: The WE Project. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH 2021; 44:117-125. [PMID: 32842000 PMCID: PMC7902738 DOI: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Using a community-based participatory research approach, a citywide survey was conducted to explore perceptions of obesity and interventions to reduce obesity within an African American urban community. More than 1300 surveys were collected within 3 months; 92.9% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that obesity was an important health issue in the community and the majority indicated that family-based interventions were the preferred pathway for improving physical activity (86.0%) and nutrition (85.2%). Engaging community members in survey development and implementation was an effective approach to build local research capacity and establish a shared agenda of reaching a diverse sample of community residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maghboeba Mosavel
- Departments of Health Behavior and Policy (Drs Mosavel and LaRose), Family Medicine, Division of Epidemiology (Dr Lu), and Occupational Therapy (Dr Winship), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and Pathways, Inc, Petersburg, Virginia (Ms Ferrell)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zoellner JM, Porter KJ, Brock DJP, Mitchell EMK, Chapman H, Clarkston D, Cohn W, Hauser L, Morris DW, Ramey SY, Robinson B, Schriefer S, Voges N, Wiseman KP. Advancing engagement and capacity for rural cancer control: a mixed-methods case study of a Community-Academic Advisory Board in the Appalachia region of Southwest Virginia. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:44. [PMID: 34158127 PMCID: PMC8218281 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00285-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives are to: 1) describe engagement processes used to prioritize and address regional comprehensive cancer control needs among a Community-Academic Advisory Board (CAB) in the medically-underserved, rural Appalachian region, and 2) detail longitudinal CAB evaluation findings. METHODS This three-year case study (2017-2020) used a convergent parallel, mixed-methods design. The approach was guided by community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, the Comprehensive Participatory Planning and Evaluation process, and Nine Habits of Successful Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalitions. Meeting artifacts were tracked and evaluated. CAB members completed quantitative surveys at three time points and semi-structured interviews at two time points. Quantitative data were analyzed using analysis of variance tests. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via an inductive-deductive process. RESULTS Through 13 meetings, Prevention and Early Detection Action Teams created causal models and prioritized four cancer control needs: human papillomavirus vaccination, tobacco control, colorectal cancer screening, and lung cancer screening. These sub-groups also began advancing into planning and intervention proposal development phases. As rated by 49 involved CAB members, all habits significantly improved from Time 1 to Time 2 (i.e., communication, priority work plans, roles/accountability, shared decision making, value-added collaboration, empowered leadership, diversified funding, trust, satisfaction; all p < .05), and most remained significantly higher at Time 3. CAB members also identified specific challenges (e.g., fully utilizing member expertise), strengths (e.g., diverse membership), and recommendations across habits. CONCLUSION This project's equity-based CBPR approach used a CPPE process in conjunction with internal evaluation of cancer coalition best practices to advance CAB efforts to address cancer disparities in rural Appalachia. This approach encouraged CAB buy-in and identified key strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities that will lay the foundation for continued involvement in cancer control projects. These engagement processes may serve as a template for similar coalitions in rural, underserved areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M. Zoellner
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St, Christiansburg, VA 24073 USA
| | - Kathleen J. Porter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St, Christiansburg, VA 24073 USA
| | - Donna-Jean P. Brock
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St, Christiansburg, VA 24073 USA
| | - Emma Mc Kim Mitchell
- School of Nursing, University of Virginia, PO Box 800782, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Howard Chapman
- Tri-Area Community Health, P.O. Box 9, Laurel Fork, VA 24352 USA
| | - Deborah Clarkston
- Mountain Empire Community College Nursing Program, Phillips-Taylor Hall Rm 136, 3441 Mountain Empire Rd, Big Stone Gap, VA 24219 USA
| | - Wendy Cohn
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Lindsay Hauser
- Office of Outreach and Engagement, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Box 800334, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Dianne W. Morris
- Mountain Laurel Cancer Support and Resource Center, Mountain Empire Older Citizens, Inc., P.O. Box 888, Big Stone Gap, VA 24219 USA
| | - Sarah Y. Ramey
- Clinch Valley Medical Center, 6801 Gov. G. C. Peery Hwy., Richlands, Virginia, 24641 USA
| | - Brenna Robinson
- Office of Outreach and Engagement, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Box 800334, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | | | - Noelle Voges
- Office of Community Outreach & Engagement, University of Virginia Cancer Center, P.O. Box 800334, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
| | - Kara P. Wiseman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Espinosa PR, Verney SP. The Underutilization of Community-based Participatory Research in Psychology: A Systematic Review. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 67:312-326. [PMID: 33165973 PMCID: PMC8106689 DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Traditional non-participatory research methodologies have struggled to address the needs of multicultural populations in the United States (U.S.). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a research paradigm offering a unique opportunity for culturally appropriate research and improving health equity. CBPR is an equitable, strength-based approach involving all stakeholders throughout the research process. We investigate the field of psychology's utilization of CBPR as an approach for working with multicultural populations to collaboratively address relevant and impactful research questions. A total of 1912 CBPR-related articles, from 2004 to 2014, were identified using PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINAHL Complete databases. Of these, approximately 16% (n = 311) met our criteria for psychology-related CBPR articles accounting for a negligible amount (<1%) of peer-reviewed publications in mainstream psychological journals during the same time period. Among U.S. psychology-related CBPR articles, 86% focused on multicultural and marginalized populations. Prominent topics of investigation included physical health, mental and behavioral health, and theoretical or methodological articles. Features of publications, including authors' training, types of journals, study populations, and topics under investigation, were explored for all 1912 publications. Findings highlight an opportunity for further utilization of CBPR within psychology, with key implications for health equity. Recommendations for increasing CBPR uptake within the discipline are also offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa
- Office of Community Engagement, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Psychology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Steven P. Verney
- Psychology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Boursaw B, Oetzel JG, Dickson E, Thein TS, Sanchez-Youngman S, Peña J, Parker M, Magarati M, Littledeer L, Duran B, Wallerstein N. Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community-Engaged Research. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 67:256-270. [PMID: 33599288 PMCID: PMC8355013 DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite the growth of research on community-engaged research (CEnR), recent reviews suggest there has been limited development of validated scales to measure key contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes, impairing testing and refinement of theoretical models. The purpose of this study is to present the psychometric properties of scales from the Engage for Equity (E2) project, stemming from a long-term research partnership examining community-engaged research projects. This study used a three-stage, cross-sectional format: (a) a sampling frame of 413 CEnR projects was identified; (b) 210 principal investigators completed a project-level survey and nominated partners for another survey; (c) 457 investigators and partners completed a survey about project contexts, processes, interventions, and outcomes. Factorial validity was established through confirmatory factor analysis supporting seven scales: contextual capacity, commitment to collective empowerment, relationships, community engagement in research actions, synergy, partner and partnership transformation, and projected outcomes. Convergent validity was established through examining covariances among the scales. This study largely yielded results consistent with a previous psychometric study of related measures, while demonstrating improved ceiling effects of the items and refined conceptualization of core theoretical constructs.
Collapse
|
31
|
Moore de Peralta A, Prieto Rosas V, Smithwick J, Timmons SM, Torres ME. A Contribution to Measure Partnership Trust in Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions With Latinx Communities in the United States. Health Promot Pract 2021; 23:672-685. [PMID: 33890505 DOI: 10.1177/15248399211004622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Given the growing diversity in the United States, responsiveness to the needs of diverse communities is paramount. Latinx communities in the United States often state mistrust in outside institutions because of adverse experiences. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is considered a trust-building process and is one approach to understand disparities. However, the conceptualization and evaluation of trust as a CBPR outcome are understudied. This article summarizes a community-engaged research process conducted for the cultural and linguistic refinement of a partnership trust survey tool to assess partnership trust as an outcome of CBPR (CBPR-PTS), by using Perinatal Awareness for Successful Outcomes (PASOs) as a case study and cross-cultural cognitive interviewing (CCCI) methodology. The participants were 21 diverse stakeholders of PASOs, a community-based health organization that serves the Latinx population in South Carolina. A modified version of the multidimensional measure of trust model informed instrument development. The team analyzed the CCCI data using compiling informal analysis to identify which survey items' wordings must be changed or adapted based on the participants' accounts. Sixteen of 28 questions subjected to CCCI required modifications due to translation errors, culturally specific errors, or general cognitive problems. The new survey instrument has 19 scales and 195 items categorized into nine dimensions of the modified multidimensional measure of trust model. CCCI was a useful tool to address the cross-cultural understanding issues of the CBPR-PTS. Measurement instruments should be able to capture the socioeconomic, cultural, and geographic/environmental variability of community stakeholders to help understand the diversity of the comprehension and views of the communities involved in disparities' reduction efforts.
Collapse
|
32
|
Enard KR, Nicks SE, Campbell BA, McClure SM. In pursuit of equity: partnering to improve breast and prostate cancer outcomes among African Americans. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:473-482. [PMID: 33742258 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01412-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative partnership approach that leverages the strengths of academic-community groups to address local problems. CBPR emphasizes equity (e.g., co-learning, power-sharing, participatory decision-making) among groups to achieve goals and promote sustainability. This study examines group dynamics, and their influence on achieving shared goals, within a CBPR-guided partnership established to improve breast and prostate cancer outcomes among underserved African American communities in St. Louis, Missouri. METHODS We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with key academic and community informants and surveyed via email community collaborators involved in outreach activities. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and independently coded by two authors using an iterative, open-coding process to identify major themes. Surveys were summarized using similar coding criteria for open-ended responses and descriptive statistics for discrete responses. Using a grounded theory approach, we summarized and compared themes from each data source to identify similarities and differences and triangulated results to generate overarching thematic findings. RESULTS Participants described benefits from the partnership (funding; clinical, public health and evaluation expertise; training and networking opportunities) and found beneficial ways to leverage the partners' strengths in collaborating Participants expressed long-term commitment to sustaining the partnership and building capacity to address cancer disparities, but faced challenges related to power-sharing and participatory decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Using CBPR to address cancer disparities is an effective approach to capacity-building and achieving shared goals. By evaluating the structures and processes within CBPR collaborations through the lens of equity, partners may identify and address challenges that threaten long-term partnership sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R Enard
- Department of Health Management & Policy, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, Room 365, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
| | - S E Nicks
- Department of Social and Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Grover Center W356, 53 Richland Ave, Athens, OH, 45701, USA
| | - B A Campbell
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, 1450 3rd Street, Room HD-556, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - S M McClure
- Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama, 15 ten Hoor Hall, PO Box 870210, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35475, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Coordinator Perceptions When Assessing the Impact of Citizen Science towards Sustainable Development Goals. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13042377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Tracking progress towards the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires high-quality, timely, and accessible data, often in areas where data are rarely available. Problems exist due to socioeconomic variations between countries and the qualitative nature of certain indicators in their definition. Citizen science has the potential to contribute to several SDGs. However, whilst citizen science’s potential to contribute towards SDGs is well documented, limitations exist when measuring the impact that citizen science has made toward SDG progress. To better understand the issues and prospective solutions surrounding impact assessment towards SDG progress, this work presents the outcomes of semi-structured interviews with citizen science project coordinators. They reveal the complex nature of impact assessment within a citizen science context. Coordinators demonstrate greater confidence when the project is easier to relate to the SDGs, and the project methodology can objectively measure indicators. Issues exist, however, when considering SDGs with a broader, global context, those more difficult to link to project goals and when the project’s impact on them happens at timescales beyond the funding period. If the full potential of citizen-science contributions to the SDGs is to be realised, approaches are needed to fully consider practitioners’ needs and motivations.
Collapse
|
34
|
Israel BA, Lachance L, Coombe CM, Lee SYD, Jensen M, Wilson-Powers E, Mentz G, Muhammad M, Rowe Z, Reyes AG, Brush BL. Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success: Theory and Methods for Measuring Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2021; 14:129-140. [PMID: 32280130 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous conceptual frameworks have been developed to understand how community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships function, and multiple measurement approaches have been designed to evaluate them. However, most measures are not validated, and have focused on new partnerships. To define and assess the meaning of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, we are conducting a CBPR study, Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS). In this article we describe the theoretical underpinnings and methodological approaches used. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study are to 1) develop a questionnaire to evaluate success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, 2) test the psychometric qualities of the questionnaire, 3) assess the relationships between key variables and refine the questionnaire and theoretical model, and 4) develop mechanisms and a feedback tool to apply partnership evaluation findings. METHODS Methodological approaches have included: engaged a community-academic national Expert Panel; conducted key informant interviews with Expert Panel; conducted a scoping literature review; conducted a Delphi process with the Expert Panel; and revised the measurement instrument. Additional methods include: conduct cognitive interviews and pilot testing; revise and test final version of the questionnaire with long-standing CBPR partnerships; examine the reliability and validity; analyze the relationship among variables in the framework; revise the framework; and develop a feedback mechanism for sharing partnership evaluation results. CONCLUSIONS Through the application of a theoretical model and multiple methodological approaches, the MAPS study will result in a validated measurement instrument and will develop procedures for effectively feeding back evaluation findings in order to strengthen authentic partnerships to achieve health equity.
Collapse
|
35
|
Vasquez KS, Chatterjee S, Khalida C, Moftah D, D'Orazio B, Leinberger-Jabari A, Tobin JN, Kost RG. Using attendance data for social network analysis of a community-engaged research partnership. J Clin Transl Sci 2020; 5:e75. [PMID: 33948293 PMCID: PMC8057467 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (RU-CCTS) and Clinical Directors Network (CDN), a Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN), fostered a community-academic research partnership involving Community Health Center (CHCs) clinicians, laboratory scientists, clinical researchers, community, and patient partners. From 2011 to 2018, the partnership designed and completed Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Project (CAMP1), an observational study funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and CAMP2, a Comparative Effectiveness Research Study funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). We conducted a social network analysis (SNA) to characterize this Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) partnership. METHODS Projects incorporated principles of Community-Based Participatory Research (CAMP1/2) and PCORI engagement rubrics (CAMP2). Meetings were designed to be highly interactive, facilitate co-learning, share governance, and incentivize ongoing engagement. Meeting attendance formed the raw dataset enriched by stakeholder roles and affiliations. We used SNA software (Gephi) to form networks for four project periods, characterize network attributes (density, degree, centrality, vulnerability), and create sociograms. Polynomial regression models were used to study stakeholder interactions. RESULTS Forty-seven progress meetings engaged 141 stakeholders, fulfilling 7 roles, and affiliated with 28 organizations (6 types). Network size, density, and interactions across organizations increased over time. Interactions between Community Members or Recruiters/Community Health Workers and almost every other role increased significantly across CAMP2 (P < 0.005); Community Members' centrality to the network increased over time. CONCLUSIONS In a partnership with a highly interactive meeting model, SNA using operational attendance data afforded a view of stakeholder interactions that realized the engagement goals of the partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S Vasquez
- Community and Collaboration Core, The Rockefeller University, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shirshendu Chatterjee
- Department of Mathematics, City University of New York, City College & Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chamanara Khalida
- Center for Excellence for Practice-Based Research and Learning, Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA
| | - Dena Moftah
- Center for Excellence for Practice-Based Research and Learning, Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA
| | - Brianna D'Orazio
- Center for Excellence for Practice-Based Research and Learning, Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jonathan N Tobin
- Community and Collaboration Core, The Rockefeller University, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Excellence for Practice-Based Research and Learning, Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA
| | - Rhonda G Kost
- Community and Collaboration Core, The Rockefeller University, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
McMullen JM, George M, Ingman BC, Pulling Kuhn A, Graham DJ, Carson RL. A Systematic Review of Community Engagement Outcomes Research in School-Based Health Interventions. THE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH 2020; 90:985-994. [PMID: 33184891 PMCID: PMC7702099 DOI: 10.1111/josh.12962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involving communities in school health has been purported as a practice integral to supporting a Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) approach. Although community collaboration is often included in school-based health initiatives, there is little research considering methods for increasing community engagement. The purpose of this study was to identify effective school-based health interventions documenting changes in community engagement. METHODS Academic experts and school stakeholders guided procedures for a systematic review of studies published from 1987-2017 and gray literature (ie, best practice documents; policy documents, etc.) on comprehensive school health interventions including community engagement as a targeted outcome. RESULTS The search identified 9 studies addressing community as an outcome of school-based health interventions; types of partnership mechanisms and partners' roles were classified. CONCLUSIONS Although involving communities is a WSCC component and commonly recommended as a strategy fundamental to school health, there is little empirical research examining effective strategies for engaging communities and engagement is often not measured as part of intervention studies. Further measurement and research in engaging communities in school health is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimie M McMullen
- Associate Professor, , University of Northern Colorado, Sport and Exercise Science, Gunter Hall 2640 Campus Box 39 Greeley Colorado 80639
| | - Melissa George
- Associate Director Prevention Research Center, Research Scientist, , Colorado State University Human Development and Family Studies, Lake Street Offices 159 1508 Center Ave., Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
| | - Benjamin C Ingman
- Director of Research & Evaluation, Research Assistant Professor , Center for Rural School Health & Education, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, 1999 E Evans Ave, Denver, Colorado 80210
| | - Ann Pulling Kuhn
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, , University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 737 W. Lombard St, Room 169C Baltimore, Maryland 21201
| | - Dan J Graham
- Associate Professor, , Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery Fort Collins CO 80523
| | - Russell L Carson
- Research Advisor, , PlayCore, 544 Chestnut St., Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Moullin JC, Sklar M, Green A, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Reeder K, Aarons GA. Advancing the pragmatic measurement of sustainment: a narrative review of measures. Implement Sci Commun 2020; 1:76. [PMID: 32964208 PMCID: PMC7499830 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00068-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sustainment, an outcome indicating an intervention continues to be implemented over time, has been comparatively less studied than other phases of the implementation process. This may be because of methodological difficulties, funding cycles, and minimal attention to theories and measurement of sustainment. This review synthesizes the literature on sustainment measures, evaluates the qualities of each measure, and highlights the strengths and gaps in existing sustainment measures. Results of the review will inform recommendations for the development of a pragmatic, valid, and reliable measure of sustainment. METHODS A narrative review of published sustainment outcome and sustainability measures (i.e., factors that influence sustainment) was conducted, including appraising measures in the Society of Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) instrument review project (IRP) and the Dissemination and Implementation Grid-Enabled Measures database initiative (GEM-D&I). The narrative review used a snowballing strategy by searching the reference sections of literature reviews and definitions of sustainability and sustainment. Measures used frequently and judged to be comprehensive and/or validated by a team of implementation scientists were extracted for analysis. RESULTS Eleven measures were evaluated. Three of the included measures were found in the SIRC-IRP, three in the GEM-D&I database, (one measure was in both databases) and six were identified in our additional searches. Thirteen constructs relating to sustainment were coded from selected measures. Measures covered a range of determinants for sustainment (i.e., construct of sustainability) as well as constructs of sustainment as an outcome. Strengths of the measures included, development by expert panels knowledgeable about particular interventions, fields or contexts, and utility in specific scenarios. A number of limitations were found in the measures analyzed including inadequate assessment of psychometric characteristics, being overly intervention or context specific, being lengthy and/or complex, and focusing on outer context factors. CONCLUSION There is a lack of pragmatic and psychometrically sound measures of sustainment that can be completed by implementation stakeholders within inner context settings (e.g., frontline providers, supervisors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna C. Moullin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102 Australia
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
| | - Marisa Sklar
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812 USA
- UC San Diego Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (UC San Diego DISC), Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, 9500 Gilman Drive (0990), La Jolla, CA 92093-0990 USA
| | - Amy Green
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
- The Trevor Project, PO Box 69232, West Hollywood, CA 90069 USA
| | - Kelsey S. Dickson
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
- San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
| | - Nicole A. Stadnick
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812 USA
- UC San Diego Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (UC San Diego DISC), Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, 9500 Gilman Drive (0990), La Jolla, CA 92093-0990 USA
| | - Kendal Reeder
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812 USA
| | - Gregory A. Aarons
- Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812 USA
- UC San Diego Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (UC San Diego DISC), Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, 9500 Gilman Drive (0990), La Jolla, CA 92093-0990 USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Development of a novel social incubator for health promoting initiatives in a disadvantaged region. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:898. [PMID: 32522166 PMCID: PMC7285712 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08990-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bottom-up approaches to disparity reduction present a departure from traditional service models where health services are traditionally delivered top-down. Raphael, a novel bottom-up social incubator, was developed in a disadvantaged region with the aim of ‘hatching’ innovative health improvement interventions through academia-community partnership. Methods Community organizations were invited to submit proposals for incubation. Selection was made using the criteria of innovation, population neediness and potential for health impact and sustainability. Raphael partnered with organizations to pilot and evaluate their intervention with $5000 seed-funding. The evaluation was guided by the conceptual framework of technological incubators. Outcomes and sustainability were ascertained through qualitative and quantitative analysis of records and interviews at 12 months and 3–5 years, and the Community Impact of Research Oriented Partnerships (CIROP) questionnaire was administered to community partners. Results Ninety proposals were submitted between 2013 and 2015 principally from non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Thirteen interventions were selected for ‘incubation’. Twelve successfully ‘hatched’: three demonstrated sustainability with extension locally or nationally through acquiring external competitive funding; six continued to have influence within their organizations; three failed to continue beyond the pilot. Benefits to the organisations included acquisition of skills including advocacy, teaching and health promotion, evaluation skills and ability to utilize acquired knowledge for implementation. CIROP demonstrated that individuals’ research skills were reported to improve (mean ± sd) 4.80 ± 2.49 along with confidence in being able to use knowledge acquired in everyday practice (5.50 ± 1.38) and new connections were facilitated (5.33 ± 2.25). Conclusions Raphael, devised as a ‘social incubator’, succeeded in nurturing novel ideas engendered by community organizations that aimed to impact on health disparities. Judging by success rates of technological incubators its goals were realized to a considerable degree.
Collapse
|
39
|
Luger TM, Hamilton AB, True G. Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review. Milbank Q 2020; 98:493-553. [PMID: 32428339 PMCID: PMC7296434 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Community‐engaged research (CEnR) engenders meaningful academic‐community partnerships to improve research quality and health outcomes. CEnR has increasingly been adopted by health care systems, funders, and communities looking for solutions to intractable problems. It has been difficult to systematically measure CEnR's impact, as most evaluations focus on project‐specific outcomes. Similarly, partners have struggled with identifying appropriate measures to assess outcomes of interest. To make a case for CEnR's value, we must demonstrate the impacts of CEnR over time. We compiled recent measures and developed an interactive data visualization to facilitate more consistent measurement of CEnR's theoretical domains.
Context Community‐engaged research (CEnR) aims to engender meaningful academic‐community partnerships to increase research quality and impact, improve individual and community health, and build capacity for uptake of evidence‐based practices. Given the urgency to solve society's pressing public health problems and increasing competition for funding, it is important to demonstrate CEnR's value. Most evaluations focus on project‐specific outcomes, making it difficult to demonstrate CEnR's broader impact. Moreover, it is challenging for partnerships to identify assessments of interest beyond process measures. We conducted a mapping review to help partnerships find and select measures to evaluate CEnR projects and to characterize areas where further development of measures is needed. Methods We searched electronic bibliographic databases using relevant search terms from 2009 to 2018 and scanned CEnR projects to identify unpublished measures. Through review and reduction, we found 69 measures of CEnR's context, process, or outcomes that are potentially generalizable beyond a specific health condition or population. We abstracted data from descriptions of each measure to catalog purpose, aim (context, process, or outcome), and specific domains being measured. Findings We identified 28 measures of the conditions under which CEnR is conducted and factors to support effective academic‐community collaboration (context); 43 measures evaluating constructs such as group dynamics and trust (process); and 43 measures of impacts such as benefits and challenges of CEnR participation and system and capacity changes (outcomes). Conclusions We found substantial variation in how academic‐community partnerships conceptualize and define even similar domains. Achieving more consistency in how partnerships evaluate key constructs could reduce measurement confusion apparent in the literature. A hybrid approach whereby partnerships discuss common metrics and develop locally important measures can address CEnR's multiple goals. Our accessible data visualization serves as a convenient resource to support partnerships’ evaluation goals and may help to build the evidence base for CEnR through the use of common measures across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tana M Luger
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Health Services Research and Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy
| | - Alison B Hamilton
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Health Services Research and Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy.,David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Gala True
- Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System, South Central Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center.,Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Section of Community and Population Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Aubin D, Hebert M, Eurich D. The importance of measuring the impact of patient-oriented research. CMAJ 2020; 191:E860-E864. [PMID: 31387956 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.190237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Aubin
- Career Development in Methods and Health Services Research (Aubin, Hebert, Eurich), Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit; School of Public Health (Aubin, Eurich), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Hebert), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
| | - Marilynne Hebert
- Career Development in Methods and Health Services Research (Aubin, Hebert, Eurich), Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit; School of Public Health (Aubin, Eurich), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Hebert), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Dean Eurich
- Career Development in Methods and Health Services Research (Aubin, Hebert, Eurich), Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit; School of Public Health (Aubin, Eurich), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Hebert), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ortiz K, Nash J, Shea L, Oetzel J, Garoutte J, Sanchez-Youngman S, Wallerstein N. Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship. Annu Rev Public Health 2020; 41:177-199. [PMID: 31922931 PMCID: PMC8095013 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scholarship examining the usefulness of community-engaged research (CEnR) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) for eliminating health inequities.This article seeks to synthesize the extant literature of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other related reviews regarding the context, processes, and research designs and interventions underlying CEnR that optimize its effectiveness. Through a scoping review, we have utilized an empirically derived framework of CBPR to map this literature and identify key findings and priorities for future research. Our study found 100 reviews of CEnR that largely support the CBPR conceptual framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasim Ortiz
- Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA;
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
- Institute for the Study of "Race" and Social Justice, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - Jacob Nash
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - Logan Shea
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - John Oetzel
- Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, 3240 Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Justin Garoutte
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
- Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest (BHRCS), Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA
| | - Shannon Sanchez-Youngman
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
- Center for Social Policy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
- School of Public Administration, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| | - Nina Wallerstein
- College of Population Health, Center for Participatory Research, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mahoney JE, Pinzon MM, Myers S, Renken J, Eggert E, Palmer W. The Community-Academic Aging Research Network: A Pipeline for Dissemination. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:1325-1333. [PMID: 32039476 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The Community-Academic Aging Research Network (CAARN) was created to increase the capacity and effectiveness of Wisconsin's Aging Network and the University of Wisconsin to conduct community-based research related to aging. The purpose of this article is to describe CAARN's infrastructure, outcomes, and lessons learned. DESIGN Using principles of community-based participatory research, CAARN engages stakeholders to participate in the design, development, and testing of older adult health interventions that address community needs, are sustainable, and improve health equity. SETTING Academic healthcare and community organizations. PARTICIPANTS Researchers, community members, and community organizations. INTERVENTION CAARN matches academic and community partners to develop and test evidence-based programs to be distributed by a dissemination partner. MEASUREMENTS Number of partnerships and funding received. RESULTS CAARN has facilitated 33 projects since its inception in 2010 (30 including rural populations), involving 46 academic investigators, 52 Wisconsin counties, and 1 tribe. These projects have garnered 52 grants totaling $20 million in extramural and $3 million in intramural funding. Four proven interventions are being prepared for national dissemination by the Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging: one to improve physical activity; one to reduce bowel and bladder incontinence; one to reduce sedentary behavior; and one to reduce falls risk among Latinx older adults. Additionally, one intervention to improve balance using a modified tai chi program is being disseminated by another organization. CONCLUSION CAARN's innovative structure creates a pipeline to dissemination by designing for real-world settings through inclusion of stakeholders in the early stages of design and by packaging community-based health interventions for older adults so they can be disseminated after the research has been completed. These interventions provide opportunities for clinicians to engage with community organizations to improve the health of their patients through self-management. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1325-1333, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Mahoney
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Maria Mora Pinzon
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Shannon Myers
- Wisconsin Institute for Health Aging, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jill Renken
- Wisconsin Institute for Health Aging, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Erin Eggert
- Wisconsin Institute for Health Aging, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Will Palmer
- Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ziegahn L, Joosten Y, Nevarez L, Hurd T, Evans J, Dumbauld J, Eder MM. Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training. Health Promot Pract 2020; 22:358-366. [PMID: 31948272 DOI: 10.1177/1524839919894948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Collaboration between academic researchers and community members, clinicians, and organizations is valued at all levels of the program development process in community-engaged health research (CEnR). This descriptive study examined a convenience sample of 30 projects addressing training in CEnR methods and strategies within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) consortium. Projects were selected from among posters presented at an annual community engagement conference over a 3-year period. Study goals were to learn more about how community participation in the design process affected selection of training topics, how distinct community settings influenced the selection of training formats, and the role of evaluation in preparing training participants to pursue future health research programming. Results indicated (1) a modest increase in training topics that reflected community health priorities as a result of community (as well as academic) participation at the program design stage, (2) a wide range of community-based settings for CEnR training programs, and (3) the majority of respondents conducted evaluations, which led in turn to revisions in the curricula for future training sessions. Practice and research implications are that the collaboration displayed by academic community teams around CEnR training should be traced to see if this participatory practice transfers to the design of health promotion programs. Second, collaborative training design tenets, community formats and settings, and evaluation strategies should be disseminated throughout the CTSA network and beyond. Third, common evaluative metrics and indicators of success for CEnR training programs should be identified across CTSA institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Ziegahn
- University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Thelma Hurd
- University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jill Evans
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jill Dumbauld
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yuan NP, Mayer BM, Joshweseoma L, Clichee D, Teufel-Shone NI. Development of Guidelines to Improve the Effectiveness of Community Advisory Boards in Health Research. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2020; 14:259-269. [PMID: 33416647 PMCID: PMC8530020 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community advisory boards (CABs) are a common community engagement strategy. Tools for developing CABs that are accessible to academic-community partnerships are limited. This article describes the process and partnership with the Hopi Tribe to develop CAB guidelines as a tool for research funded by the Center for Indigenous Environmental Health Research (CIEHR) and nonaffiliated projects. METHODS The CAB guidelines consist of three sections: formation, operation, and sustainability and evaluation. Each section includes best practices and interactive worksheets. The CAB guidelines were piloted with the Hopi Tribe to determine feasibility and relevance. RESULTS The CAB guidelines were well-received by the tribal CAB. Some of the worksheets were difficult to complete because they did not represent their perspectives or introduced potential tension in CAB interactions. Revisions were made accordingly. CONCLUSIONS Future evaluation and broad dissemination of the CAB guidelines will promote the use and effectiveness of CABs in health research.
Collapse
|
45
|
Brush BL, Mentz G, Jensen M, Jacobs B, Saylor KM, Rowe Z, Israel BA, Lachance L. Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2019; 47:556-568. [PMID: 31619072 DOI: 10.1177/1090198119882989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasingly used by community and academic partners to examine health inequities and promote health equity in communities. Despite increasing numbers of CBPR partnerships, there is a lack of consensus in the field regarding what defines partnership success and how to measure factors contributing to success in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Aims. To identify indicators and measures of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships as part of a larger study whose aim is to develop and validate an instrument measuring success across CBPR partnerships. Methods. The Joanna Briggs Institute framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guided searches of three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus) for articles published between 2007 and 2017 and evaluating success in CBPR partnerships existing longer than 4 years. Results. Twenty-six articles met search criteria. We identified 3 key domains and 7 subdomains with 28 underlying indicators of success. Six partnerships developed or used instruments to measure their success; only one included reliability or validity data. Discussion. CBPR partnerships reported numerous intersecting partner, partnership, and outcome indicators important for success. These results, along with data from key informant interviews with community and academic partners and advisement from a national panel of CBPR experts, will inform development of items for an instrument measuring CBPR partnership success. Conclusion. The development of a validated instrument measuring indicators of success will allow long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity and provide a tool for newly forming CBPR partnerships aiming to achieve long-term success.
Collapse
|
46
|
Tigges BB, Miller D, Dudding KM, Balls-Berry JE, Borawski EA, Dave G, Hafer NS, Kimminau KS, Kost RG, Littlefield K, Shannon J, Menon U. Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review. J Clin Transl Sci 2019; 3:261-289. [PMID: 31660251 PMCID: PMC6813516 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2019.402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the science of team science is no longer a new field, the measurement of team science and its standardization remain in relatively early stages of development. To describe the current state of team science assessment, we conducted an integrative review of measures of research collaboration quality and outcomes. METHODS Collaboration measures were identified using both a literature review based on specific keywords and an environmental scan. Raters abstracted details about the measures using a standard tool. Measures related to collaborations with clinical care, education, and program delivery were excluded from this review. RESULTS We identified 44 measures of research collaboration quality, which included 35 measures with reliability and some form of statistical validity reported. Most scales focused on group dynamics. We identified 89 measures of research collaboration outcomes; 16 had reliability and 15 had a validity statistic. Outcome measures often only included simple counts of products; publications rarely defined how counts were delimited, obtained, or assessed for reliability. Most measures were tested in only one venue. CONCLUSIONS Although models of collaboration have been developed, in general, strong, reliable, and valid measurements of such collaborations have not been conducted or accepted into practice. This limitation makes it difficult to compare the characteristics and impacts of research teams across studies or to identify the most important areas for intervention. To advance the science of team science, we provide recommendations regarding the development and psychometric testing of measures of collaboration quality and outcomes that can be replicated and broadly applied across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth B. Tigges
- University of New Mexico, College of Nursing, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Doriane Miller
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Katherine M. Dudding
- Department of Family, Community and Health Systems, University of Arizona, College of Nursing, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Elaine A. Borawski
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gaurav Dave
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nathaniel S. Hafer
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kim S. Kimminau
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Family Medicine and Community Health, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Rhonda G. Kost
- The Rockefeller University, Clinical Research Support Office, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Littlefield
- University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Office of Research and Engagement, Greensboro, NC, USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Oregon Health and Sciences University, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- University of South Florida College of Nursing, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Alexander R, Estabrooks P, Brock DJP, Hill JL, Whitt-Glover MC, Zoellner J. Capacity Development and Evaluation of a Parent Advisory Team Engaged in Childhood Obesity Research. Health Promot Pract 2019; 22:102-111. [PMID: 31409144 DOI: 10.1177/1524839919862251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Guided by community-based participatory research principles, this mixed-methods process evaluation explored the experience and capacity of a newly formed Parental Advisory Team (PAT) engaged in childhood obesity research in a medically underserved region. Following the successful completion of a 3-month evidence-based childhood obesity treatment program (iChoose), 13 parents/caregivers who completed iChoose consented to participate in the PAT. Between June 2015 and March 2016, the PAT had nine monthly meetings and completed mixed-methods capacity assessments. They engaged in activities related to understanding iChoose outcomes, defining their role and purpose as a partnership, initiating content development, and pilot testing maintenance intervention components for future iChoose efforts. Assessments included a quantitative survey administered at baseline and 9 months, and a qualitative interview completed at 9 months. Results indicated that PAT members' perceptions of the identified capacity dimensions were positive at baseline (3.8-4.3 on a 5-point scale) and remained positive at follow-up (3.9-4.4 on a 5-point scale); changes were not statistically significant. Qualitative data revealed that PAT members were satisfied with group participation and desired to enhance their role in subsequent iChoose research. Understanding and promoting parental engagement in the research process fills an important gap in childhood obesity literature.
Collapse
|
48
|
Elwood WN, Corrigan JG, Morris KA. NIH-Funded CBPR: Self-Reported Community Partner and Investigator Perspectives. J Community Health 2019; 44:740-748. [PMID: 31041573 PMCID: PMC6612294 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00661-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach across health contexts has matured greatly over the last 20 years. Though contributions to the literature on the development and effectiveness of CBPR interventions have grown, the number of publications on the function and evaluation of actual community-research partnerships has not kept pace. To help address that gap, we searched National Institutes of Health archival data and identified a set of 489 CBPR projects including collaboration-building, exploratory/pilot, research, and program project grants. We found community partner contact information commonly was absent from grant records and contacted principal investigators (PIs) for community-partner contact information. Subsequently, we built upon established measures to ask principal investigators and community partners for their perceptions of participation in NIH-funded CBPR projects. Many principal investigators and community partners reported existing collaborations-between academicians and community organizations as well as among community organizations. Partners tended to agree on the appropriateness of funding levels to accomplish projects and on the community partners' ability to recruit and retain participants, collect data, and implement interventions. Partners differed in perceptions of participation in research design, data analyses, manuscript and presentation production, and dissemination of findings. Suggestions include collection of lead community partner information without undue burden and increased standard education and involvement of community organizations in research vocabulary and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William N Elwood
- Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, Suite B1C19, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2027, USA.
| | - James G Corrigan
- Center for Research Strategy, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2580, USA
| | - Kathryn A Morris
- Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Barbosa-Leiker C, Holliday C, Burduli E, Howell D, Wynne M, Numkena N, Ford C, Katz J. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Community Program Capacity Scale for a Rural American Indian Tribe. J Nurs Meas 2019; 27:E95-E106. [PMID: 31511416 DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.27.2.e95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is often preferred in partnerships between universities and American Indian tribes. Central to CBPR is a strong impetus for capacity building. Community capacity includes capabilities and infrastructures to provide a service(s). METHODS An American Indian community advisory board developed and tested an 11-item community capacity scale. A total of 128 tribal members or those who lived on the reservation completed the survey. Exploratory factor analysis assessed the factor structure and Cronbach's alpha estimated internal consistency. RESULTS A one-factor model demonstrated adequate model fit (comparative fit index [CFI] = .92, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .06, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = .07), and items were internally consistent (alpha = .79). CONCLUSIONS Survey development with academic and tribal partners was iterative, with time spent on partnership and consensus building, resulting in a psychometrically sound and culturally relevant community program capacity scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celestina Barbosa-Leiker
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.,Programs of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University
| | - Carrie Holliday
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.,Programs of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University
| | - Ekaterina Burduli
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.,Programs of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University
| | - Donelle Howell
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.,Programs of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University
| | | | | | - Chanel Ford
- Spokane Tribe of Indians, Wellpinit, Washington
| | - Janet Katz
- College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.,Programs of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zoellner JM, You W, Hill JL, Brock DJP, Yuhas M, Alexander RC, Price B, Estabrooks PA. A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region: Rationale, design & methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 84:105801. [PMID: 31260792 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
While there is a large body of literature documenting the efficacy of family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions, there is little evidence that these interventions have been systematically translated into regular practice - particularly in health disparate regions. To address this research-practice gap, this project was guided by a community advisory board (CAB) and the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework within a systems-based and community-based participatory research approach. Families with overweight or obese children between 5 and 12 years old, in the medically-underserved Dan River Region, were randomly assigned to one of two FBCO treatment programs (iChoose vs. Family Connections) delivered by local Parks & Recreation staff. Both programs have previously demonstrated clinically meaningful child BMI z-score reductions, but vary in intensity, structure, and implementation demands. Two clinical CAB partners embedded recruitment methods into their regional healthcare organization, using procedures representative to what could be used if either program was taken to scale. The primary effectiveness outcome is child BMI z-scores at 6-months, with additional assessments at 3-months and at 12-months. Secondary goals are to determine: (1) reach into the intended audience; (2) effectiveness on secondary child and parent outcomes; (3) intervention adoption by organizations and staff; (4) fidelity, cost, and capacity for intervention implementation; and (5) maintenance of individual-level changes and organizational-level sustainability. This research addresses literature gaps related to the features within clinical and community settings that could improve both child weight status and the translation of FBCO interventions into typical practice in medically-underserved communities. IDENTIFIERS: Clincialtrials.gov: NCT03245775.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M Zoellner
- University of Virginia (UVA), Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.
| | - Wen You
- Virginia Tech, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 304 Hutcheson Hall, 24060, USA
| | - Jennie L Hill
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986075 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6075, USA
| | - Donna-Jean P Brock
- University of Virginia (UVA), Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| | - Maryam Yuhas
- University of Virginia (UVA), Department of Public Health Sciences, UVA Cancer Center Research and Outreach Office, 16 East Main Street, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
| | - Ramine C Alexander
- Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina A&T State University, Benbow 202-A, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
| | - Bryan Price
- UVA Cancer Center, Community Outreach and Education, Main Street, Unit 102, Danville, VA 24541, USA
| | - Paul A Estabrooks
- Department of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986075 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6075, USA
| |
Collapse
|