Current Practices of Live Discharge from Hospice: Social Work Perspectives

Hospice Readmission, Hospitalization, and Hospital Death Among Patients Discharged Alive from Hospice

Importance

Transitions in care settings following live discharge from hospice care are burdensome for patients and families. Factors contributing to risk of burdensome transitions following hospice discharge are understudied.

Objective

To identify factors associated with 2 burdensome transitions following hospice live discharge, as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based retrospective cohort study included a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using 2014 to 2019 Medicare claims data. Data were analyzed from April 22, 2023, to March 4, 2024.

Exposure

Live hospice discharge.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable logistic regression examined associations among patient, health care provision, and organizational characteristics with 2 burdensome transitions after live hospice discharge (outcomes): type 1, hospice discharge, hospitalization within 2 days, and hospice readmission within 2 days; and type 2, hospice discharge, hospitalization within 2 days, and hospital death.

Results

This study included 115 072 Medicare beneficiaries discharged alive from hospice (mean [SD] age, 84.4 [6.6] years; 71892 [62.5%] female; 5462 [4.8%] Hispanic, 9822 [8.5%] non-Hispanic Black, and 96 115 [83.5%] non-Hispanic White). Overall, 10 381 individuals (9.0%) experienced a type 1 burdensome transition and 3144 individuals (2.7%) experienced a type 2 burdensome transition. In adjusted models, factors associated with higher odds of burdensome transitions included identifying as non-Hispanic Black (type 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.36-1.58; type 2: aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.51-1.90), hospice stays of 7 days or fewer (type 1: aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21; type 2: aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.53-1.90), and care from a for-profit hospice (type 1: aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.62-1.96; type 2: aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.52). Nursing home residence (type 1: aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.72; type 2: aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.54) and hospice stays of 180 days or longer (type 1: aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.68; type 2: aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.69) were associated with lower odds of burdensome transitions.

Conclusion and Relevance

This retrospective cohort study of burdensome transitions following live hospice discharge found that non-Hispanic Black race, short hospice stays, and care from for-profit hospices were associated with higher odds of experiencing a burdensome transition. These findings suggest that changes to clinical practice and policy may reduce the risk of burdensome transitions, such as hospice discharge planning that is incentivized, systematically applied, and tailored to needs of patients at greater risk for burdensome transitions.

Live Discharge of Hospice Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Systematic Review

Background: Hospice is intended to promote the comfort and quality of life of dying patients and their families. When patients are discharged from hospice prior to death (ie, experience a "live discharge"), care continuity is disrupted. This systematic review summarizes the growing body of evidence on live discharge among hospice patients with Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD), a clinical subpopulation that disproportionately experiences this often burdensome care transition. Methods: Researchers conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Reviewers searched AgeLine, APA PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL Plus with Full Text, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (Core Collection). Reviewers extracted data and synthesized findings from 9 records, which reported findings from 10 individual studies. Results: The reviewed studies, which were generally of high quality, consistently identified diagnosis of ADRD as a risk factor for live discharge from hospice. The relationship between race and live hospice discharge was less clear and likely dependent upon the type of discharge under investigation and other (eg, systemic-level) factors. Research on patient and family experiences underscored the extent to which live hospice discharge can be distressing, confusing, and associated with numerous losses. Conclusion: Research specific to live discharge among ADRD patients and their families is limited. Synthesis across included studies points to the importance for future research to differentiate between types of live discharge-revocation vsversus decertification-as these are vastly different experiences in choice and circumstances.

Improving Policy and Practices of Hospice Live Discharge: A Historical Exploration of the Medicare Hospice Benefit

Hospice care in the US is heavily regulated to ensure access to the Medicare Hospice Benefit (MHB) for individuals with serious illness. Policy changes to the MHB, many of which intended to minimize potential fraud (e.g. focused medical reviews; documentation requirements for certifications, recertifications, and discharges; requirements of physician narratives and face-to-face visits), directly impact current hospice discharge practices and experiences. When patients revoke hospice or are unable to be recertified due to a stabilized condition, they lose access to the holistic philosophy of care and experience additional stressors with increased potential for burdensome transitions. Patients with chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease or related dementias, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or heart failure are more likely to have longer length of stays and are more often discharged alive from hospice. Few policy changes have been made to account for growing incidents of patients dying of chronic illness though the policy was originally created primarily for cancer patients, reflecting a time when most patients were dying of cancer. This manuscript describes the uniquely American phenomenon of a hospice live discharge, reviews relevant and historical policies, and provides recommendations for future research, policy, and practice to better support patients and families during this critical healthcare transition.

Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Caregiver Perspectives on Hospice Re-Enrollment Following a Hospice Live Discharge

Background: The number of individuals dying of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) is steadily increasing and they represent the largest group of hospice enrollees. In 2020, 15.4% of hospice patients across the United States were discharged alive from hospice care, with 5.6% decertified due to being "no longer terminally ill." A live discharge from hospice care can disrupt care continuity, increase hospitalizations and emergency room visits, and reduce the quality of life for patients and families. Furthermore, this discontinuity may impede re-enrollment into hospice services and receipt of community bereavement services. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of caregivers of adults with ADRDs around hospice re-enrollment following a live discharge from hospice. Design: We conducted semistructured interviews of caregivers of adults with ADRDs who experienced a live discharge from hospice (n = 24). Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results: Three-quarters of participants (n = 16) would consider re-enrolling their loved one in hospice. However, some believed they would have to wait for a medical crisis (n = 6) to re-enroll, while others (n = 10) questioned the appropriateness of hospice for patients with ADRDs if they cannot remain in hospice care until death. Conclusions: A live discharge for ADRD patients impacts caregivers' decisions on whether they will choose to re-enroll a patient who has been discharged alive from hospice. Further research and support of caregivers through the discharge process are necessary to ensure that patients and their caregivers remain connected to hospice agencies postdischarge.

Identifying Key Domains and Implementation Challenges for a Live Discharge From Hospice Protocol

Background: Hospice agencies lack an explicit live discharge process to guide practitioners in transitioning these patients and their primary caregivers (PCGs) out of hospice care. Based on previous research and input from an advisory committee, a live discharge protocol (LDP) was drafted with .three general areas of assessment: 1) concrete services; 2) psychosocial assessment; and 3) 30-day post discharge follow-up phone call. This study sought to gather perspectives from hospice social workers on the proposed assessment components and other needs in implementing a LDP. Methods: Purposive, convenience sampling occurred over 4 months. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 14) recruited through personal and professional contacts and social media. Four focus groups were conducted via Zoom. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Three major themes appeared: 1) benefits and challenges of having a structured discharge protocol (n = 14); 2) need for specific LDP roles across team members (n = 11); and 3) education and clear boundaries for both patients/PCGs and professionals (n = 9). Conclusions: All three assessment components of the preliminary LDP were deemed necessary by participants; however, implementation challenges were both unique for each agency and reflective of the broader hospice culture. Further research is needed to measure the impact of the LDP.

Healthcare Utilization and Mortality After Hospice Live Discharge Among Medicare Patients With and Without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

BACKGROUND

Little is known about post-discharge outcomes among patients who were discharged alive from hospice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare healthcare utilization and mortality after hospice live discharge among Medicare patients with and without Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data of a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 153,696 Medicare FFS patients experienced live discharge from hospice between 2014 and 2019.

MEASURES

Two types of burdensome transition (type 1: live discharge from hospice followed by hospitalization and subsequent hospice readmission; type 2: live discharge from hospice followed by hospitalization with the patient deceased in the hospital), acute care utilization, hospice readmission, and mortality in the 30 and 180 days after live discharge and between live discharge and death.

RESULTS

Compared with non-ADRD patients, ADRD patients were less likely to experience burdensome transitions (type 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.98; type 2: aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.75), more likely to have ED visits (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), less likely to die (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.73), and less likely to be readmitted to hospice (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89) 30 days after live discharge. Results of 180-day post-discharge outcomes were largely consistent with results of 30-day outcomes. Among patients who died as of December 31, 2019, ADRD patients were less likely to be hospitalized (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92) and more likely to be readmitted to hospice (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16) between live discharge and death. Significant racial/ethnicity disparities in acute care utilization and mortality after live discharge existed in both ADRD and non-ADRD groups.

CONCLUSION

ADRD patients had lower mortality, a longer survival time, a lower rate of hospitalization, and an initially lower but gradually increasing rate of hospice readmission than non-ADRD patients after hospice live discharge. These different trajectories warrant further investigation of the eligibility of their initial hospice enrollment. Black patients had significantly worse outcomes after hospice live discharge compared with White patients.

Association of Hospital Readmission Rates With Discharge Disposition for Patients With Psychotic Disorders

GOAL

We explored how readmissions may result from patients' lack of access to aftercare services, failure to adhere to psychotropic medication plans, and inability to understand and follow hospital discharge recommendations. We also investigated whether insurance status, demographics, and socioeconomic status are associated with hospital readmissions. This study is important because readmissions contribute to increased personal and hospital expenses and decreased community tenure (the ability to maintain stability between hospital admissions). Addressing hospital readmissions will promote optimal discharge practices beginning on day one of hospital admission.

METHODS

The study examined the differences in hospital readmission rates for patients with a primary psychotic disorder diagnosis. Discharge data were drawn in 2017 from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 0-89 years who were readmitted to a hospital between less than 24 hr and up to 30 days from discharge. Exclusion criteria were principal medical diagnoses, unplanned 30-day readmissions, and discharges against medical advice. The sampling frame included 269,906 weighted number of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder treated at one of 2,355 U.S. community hospitals. The sample size was 148,529 unweighted numbers of patients discharged.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In a logistic regression model, weighted variables were calculated and used to determine an association between the discharge dispositions and readmissions. After controlling for hospital characteristics and patient demographics, we found that the odds for readmission for routine and short-term hospital discharge dispositions decreased for home health care discharges, which indicated that home health care can prevent readmissions. The finding was statistically significant when controlling for payer type and patient age and gender.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The findings support home health care as an effective option for patients with severe psychosis. Home health care reduces readmissions and is recommended, when appropriate, as an aftercare service following inpatient hospitalization and may enhance the quality of patient care. Improving healthcare quality involves optimizing, streamlining, and promoting standardized processes in discharge planning and direct transitions to aftercare services.

Communication of palliative care needs in discharge letters from hospice providers to primary care: a multisite sequential explanatory mixed methods study

Background

The provision of palliative care is increasing, with many people dying in community-based settings. It is essential that communication is effective if and when patients transition from hospice to community palliative care. Past research has indicated that communication issues are prevalent during hospital discharges, but little is known about hospice discharges.

Methods

An explanatory sequential mixed methods study consisting of a retrospective review of hospice discharge letters, followed by hospice focus groups, to explore patterns in communication of palliative care needs of discharged patients and describe why these patients were being discharged. Discharge letters were extracted for key content information using a standardised form. Letters were then examined for language patterns using a linguistic methodology termed corpus linguistics. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the focus group transcripts. Findings were triangulated to develop an explanatory understanding of discharge communication from hospice care.

Results

We sampled 250 discharge letters from five UK hospices whereby patients had been discharged to primary care. Twenty-five staff took part in focus groups. The main reasons for discharge extracted from the letters were symptoms “managed/resolved” (75.2%), and/or the “patient wishes to die/for care at home” (37.2%). Most patients had some form of physical needs documented on the letters (98.4%) but spiritual needs were rarely documented (2.4%). Psychological/emotional needs and social needs were documented in 46.4 and 35.6% of letters respectively. There was sometimes ambiguity in “who” will be following up “what” in the discharge letters, and whether described patients’ needs were resolved or ongoing for managing in the community setting. The extent to which patients received a copy of their discharge letter varied. Focus groups conveyed a lack of consensus on what constitutes “complexity” and “complex pain”.

Conclusions

The content and structure of discharge letters varied between hospices, although generally focused on physical needs. Our study provides insights into patterns associated with those discharged from hospice, and how policy and guidance in this area may be improved, such as greater consistency of sharing letters with patients. A patient-centred set of hospice-specific discharge letter principles could help improve future practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01038-8.

The Forgotten and Misdiagnosed Care Transition: Live Discharge From Hospice Care

Every aspect of the United States healthcare industry presents transitions in care—hospitalizations, rehabilitation, long-term care placement—each requiring careful attention. With a goal of maintaining safety during a known point of vulnerability for patients, discharge planning is required in hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies under Medicare guidelines. Yet, no required discharge planning or clear guidelines are available for a discharge from hospice; it is a forgotten care transition in our healthcare system. Of the 1.6 million Medicare recipients hospices serve each year, hospices discharge 17.4% alive. Under Medicare regulations, if clinicians cannot document acceptable patient decline, then patients are decertified from hospice categorized as “no longer terminally ill”, otherwise known as a live discharge. These patients are often referred to as “not dying fast enough,” or “failure to die on time,” as ultimately, they are still dying, and they are still terminally ill, just not within the prescribed 6-month framework. This paper outlines what is known about the occurrences and experiences of live discharge from hospice care and provides suggestions for improving both practice and policy.

Survival in hospice patients with dementia: the effect of home hospice and nurse visits

BACKGROUND

Hospice patients with dementia are at increased risk for live discharge and long lengths of stay (>180 days), causing patient and family caregiver stress and burden. The location and timing of clinician visits are important factors influencing whether someone dies as expected, in hospice, or experiences a live discharge or long length of stay.

OBJECTIVE

Examine how home hospice and nurse visit frequency relate to dying in hospice within the Medicare-intended 6-month period.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Non-profit hospice agency.

PARTICIPANTS

Three thousand eight hundred and thirty seven patients with dementia who received hospice services from 2013 to 2017.

METHODS

Multivariable survival analyses examined the effects of receiving home hospice (vs. nursing home) and timing of nurse visits on death within 6 months of hospice enrollment, compared to live discharge or long length of stay. Models adjust for relevant demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent (39%) of patients experienced live discharge or long length of stay. Home hospice patients were more likely to experience live discharge or long length of stays (HR for death: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.69-0.86, p < 0.001). Frequency of nurse visits was inversely associated with live discharge and long lengths of stay (HR for death: 2.87, 95%CI: 2.47-3.33, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nearly 40% of patients with dementia in our study experienced live discharge or a long length of stay. Additional research is needed to understand why home hospice may result in live discharge or a long length of stay for patients with dementia. Nurse visits were associated with death, suggesting their responsiveness to deteriorating patient health. Hospice guidelines may need to permit longer stays so community-dwelling patients with dementia, a growing segment of hospice patients, can remain continuously enrolled in hospice and avoid burden and costs associated with live discharge.

Live discharge from hospice care: psychosocial challenges and opportunities

Hospice social workers face many challenges in attempts to replicate or supplement the holistic support and unique services hospice provides for individuals discharged alive. This discontinuity in care can impact the types of supports needed by individuals and caregivers, which may or may not be accessible within their community. Patients and families who have access to community-based palliative care programs following a discharge generally tend to navigate the process with fewer challenges. This qualitative study (N = 24) explored both the challenges of the live discharge process and the opportunities within social work practice in the US. Results from this study emphasize the need for a framework to better approach a live discharge to ensure appropriate supports are accessible for all patients and caregivers. Specifically, results highlight both the concrete and psychosocial challenges in live discharges as a result of tension between current eligibility requirements and individual feelings and needs. Social workers also provided suggestions to improve the live discharge process, including attention to communication and preparation. This paper outlines specific challenges of live discharge from hospice, a framework for understanding presented challenges, and implications for policy and practice.

A Theoretical Exploration of Live Discharge from Hospice for Caregivers of Adults with Dementia

Patients with dementia may be discharged from hospice if their condition stabilizes. The loss of professional support and an already complex grief process needs careful attention. A live discharge presents a unique experience for each hospice patient, caregiver, and hospice team, which varies from traditional bereavement theories used to describe the grieving process. This article explores live discharge from hospice for caregivers of adults with dementia through a theoretical lens of Symbolic Interactionism (SI) and Attachment Theory (AT). The theories of SI and AT support and assist in understanding the experience of caregivers who lose hospice support due to ineligibility. In addition, caregivers watch the gradual deterioration and psychological loss of someone with dementia while they remain alive described as an ambiguous loss. Ambiguous loss as a subset of traditional bereavement theories provides a framework for this exploration and provides a relevant illustration of the complex needs. This article will conclude with implications for social work practice. It is important for hospice clinicians to be aware of current termination practices necessary to manage appropriate attachments, support the symbolic meaning of the hospice experience, validate the ambiguous losses, and maintain a sense of hope through a live discharge from hospice.

Race, Ethnicity, and Other Risks for Live Discharge Among Hospice Patients with Dementia

OBJECTIVES

The end-of-life trajectory for persons with dementia is often protracted and difficult to predict, placing these individuals at heightened risk of live discharge from hospice. Risks for live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline among patients with dementia are not well established. Our aim was to identify demographic, health, and hospice service factors associated with live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline among hospice patients with dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A large not-for-profit agency in New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2629 hospice patients with dementia age 65 years and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was live discharge from hospice due to condition stabilization or failure to decline (vs death). Measures include demographic factors (race/ethnicity, Medicaid, sex, age, marital status, parental status), health characteristics (primary dementia diagnosis, comorbidities, functional status, prior hospitalization), and hospice service (location, length of service, number and timing of nurse visits).

RESULTS

Logistic regression models indicated that compared with white hospice patients with dementia, African American and Hispanic hospice patients with dementia experienced increased risk of live discharge (African American: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-4.38; Hispanic: aOR = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.81-4.94). Home hospice (aOR = 7.57; 95% CI = 4.04-14.18), longer length of service (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.04-1.05), and more days between nurse visits and discharge (aOR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.56-2.21) were also associated with live discharge.

CONCLUSION

To avoid burdensome and disruptive transitions out of hospice in patients with dementia, interventions to reduce live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline should be tailored to meet the needs of African American, Hispanic, and home hospice patients. Policies regarding sustained hospice eligibility should account for the variable and protracted end-of-life trajectory of patients with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:551-558, 2020.