Treatment of the male with follicle-stimulating hormone in intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa: a randomized study

Empirical Treatments for Male Infertility: A Focus on Lifestyle Modifications and Medicines

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Male infertility is a prevalent issue impacting numerous couples worldwide. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of empirical therapies for male infertility, focusing on both lifestyle modifications and medical treatments. This study provides a comprehensive overview of interventions aimed at improving male fertility outcomes.

METHODS

A thorough review of the existing literature was conducted, encompassing studies on lifestyle changes such as dietary changes, smoking cessation, alcohol moderation, and exercise. Additionally, medical treatments including selective estrogen receptor modulators, gonadotropins, aromatase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, antioxidants, dopamine agonists, kallikrein, indomethacin, low-dose corticosteroids, alpha-blockers, and nitric oxide donors were evaluated. The study population included males diagnosed with infertility, focusing on various underlying causes.

RESULTS

Lifestyle modifications were found to have a positive impact on sperm quality. Evidence shows that a healthy diet, smoking cessation, moderate alcohol consumption, and regular exercise improve fertility outcomes. Medical treatments demonstrated significant improvements in sperm production and quality. Selective estrogen receptor modulators and gonadotropins enhanced sperm parameters. Aromatase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors specifically improved sperm motility and increased pregnancy rates. Antioxidants, such as vitamins E and C and coenzyme Q10, reduced oxidative stress and enhanced sperm counts, motility, and morphology. Dopamine agonists, particularly cabergoline, normalized prolactin levels and improved fertility outcomes. Kallikrein therapy improved sperm parameters and increased pregnancy rates. Indomethacin treatment was associated with increased sperm concentrations and motility. Low-dose corticosteroids and alpha-blockers showed variable results, and nitric oxide donors like L-arginine enhanced sperm counts and motility.

CONCLUSIONS

Empirical therapies, including lifestyle modifications and medical treatments, significantly enhance sperm quality and reproductive potential. These integrated approaches are essential in improving fertility outcomes in males. However, further extensive randomized trials are necessary to definitively establish the most effective treatments.

[Medical treatments for male infertility]

BACKGROUND

Treatments to stimulate spermatogenesis and antioxidant food supplements are often offered to infertile patients either before sperm extraction surgery to improve results, or as part of medically assisted reproduction or spontaneous fertility to increase the likelihood of a live birth.

METHODS

A bibliographic search limited to English-language literature on men published before 5/2023 was carried out, including clinical trials, literature reviews and meta-analyses on spermatogenesis-stimulating molecules and antioxidant treatments.

RESULTS

Several medical treatments seem capable of improving male fertility: they act mainly by stimulating spermatogenesis through hormones, or by reducing the effects of oxidative stress. With regard to oligoasthenozoospermia, the literature shows that certain hormonal treatments stimulating spermatogenesis are useful. In the case of non-obstructive azoospermia, the value of treatment depends on the patient's FSH and testosterone levels. AOX supplementation appears to improve certain spermogram parameters and have an impact on pregnancy and live birth rates.

CONCLUSION

This review should help urologists gain a better understanding of the various medical treatments and enable them to define an appropriate therapeutic strategy, tailored to the patient and the couple, in order to obtain the best results.

Sperm Concentration Improvement May Be a Parameter Predicting Efficacy of FSH Therapy of Male Idiopathic Infertility

Testis stimulation with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is one of the empirical treatments proposed for male idiopathic infertility, although reliable markers to predict its efficacy are still lacking. This study aimed to identify parameters able to predict FSH efficacy in terms of pregnancy achievement. A real-world study was conducted, enrolling idiopathic infertile men treated with FSH 150IU three times weekly. Patients were treated until pregnancy achievement or for a maximum of two years and two visits were considered: V0 (baseline) and V1 (end of FSH treatment). Primary endpoints were the V1-V0 percentage change in sperm concentration, total sperm count, and total motile sperm number. In total, 48 pregnancies were recorded (27.7%) among 173 men (age 37.9 ± 6.2 years). All three endpoints increased after FSH administration, and only the V1-V0 percentage of sperm concentration significantly predicted pregnancy (p = 0.007). A V1-V0 sperm concentration of 30.8% predicted pregnancy, and the sperm concentration V1-V0 percentage (Y) required to obtain a pregnancy was predicted according to its baseline values (x): Y = 9.8433x2 - 203.67x + 958.29. A higher number of pregnancies was reached in men with baseline sperm concentration below 7.3 million/mL. Thus, the percentage of sperm concentration increasing after FSH administration could predict the treatment efficacy in terms of pregnancy. At the dosage used, the efficacy was significantly higher in patients with a starting sperm concentration < 7.3 mill/mL. Mathematical analyses identified a function able to predict the sperm concentration increase required to obtain a pregnancy in relation to the baseline sperm number.

Real-world evidence analysis of the follicle-stimulating hormone use in male idiopathic infertility

Male idiopathic infertility remains a therapeutic challenge in the couple infertility management. In this setting, an empirical treatment with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is allowed, although not recommended. Twenty-one clinical trials and four meta-analyses highlighted an overall increased pregnancy rate in case of FSH administration, but the indiscriminate FSH prescription is still unsupported by clinical evidence in idiopathic infertility. This context could represent an example in which real-world data (RWD) could add useful information. From a nationwide clinical practice survey performed in Italy, emerged the clinicians' attitude to prescribe FSH in the case of impaired semen with a significant improvement of semen parameters, identifying FSH treatment as a therapeutic card in the real-life management. Although more robust data are still needed to optimize FSH treatment in male idiopathic infertility, RWD should be included in the body of evidence considered in healthcare decision-making.

FSH dosage effect on conventional sperm parameters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) represents a therapeutic option in normogonadotropic patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia. The aim of this review was to evaluate the possible dose- and drug-dependent efficacy of FSH treatment on conventional sperm parameters. We performed a comprehensive systematic review via a meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials, in which FSH administration was compared with placebo or no treatment when administered to normogonadotropic patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia. Of the 971 articles that were retrieved, 5 were finally included, including a total of 372 patients and 294 controls. Overall, FSH treatment was effective in ameliorating the sperm concentration, total count, progressive motility, but not normal forms. On the basis of the weekly dosage, the studies were classified into those using low (175–262.5 IU per week), intermediate (350–525 IU per week), and high (700–1050 IU per week) doses. At low doses, FSH improved only sperm motility. At intermediate doses, FSH ameliorated sperm concentration and morphology. Total sperm count and progressive motility showed a trend toward the increase. At high doses, FSH increased sperm concentration, total sperm count, and progressive motility. Sperm morphology showed a trend toward the increase. Finally, both highly purified FSH (hpFSH) and recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) improved sperm concentration, total sperm count, progressive motility, but not morphology. No different efficacy was observed between these two preparations. This meta-analysis provides evidence in favor of high FSH doses. The FSH efficacy was not related to the preparation type (recombinant vs highly purified). Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of long-standing treatment regimes.

Prospects for FSH Treatment of Male Infertility

CONTEXT

Despite the new opportunities provided by assisted reproductive technology (ART), male infertility treatment is far from being optimized. One possibility, based on pathophysiological evidence, is to stimulate spermatogenesis with gonadotropins.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a comprehensive systematic PubMed literature review, up to January 2020, of studies evaluating the genetic basis of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) action, the role of FSH in spermatogenesis, and the effects of its administration in male infertility. Manuscripts evaluating the role of genetic polymorphisms and FSH administration in women undergoing ART were considered whenever relevant.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

FSH treatment has been successfully used in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, but with questionable results in idiopathic male infertility. A limitation of this approach is that treatment plans for male infertility have been borrowed from hypogonadism, without daring to overstimulate, as is done in women undergoing ART. FSH effectiveness depends not only on its serum levels, but also on individual genetic variants able to determine hormonal levels, activity, and receptor response. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the follicle-stimulating hormone subunit beta (FSHB) and follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) genes have been described, with some of them affecting testicular volume and sperm output. The FSHR p.N680S and the FSHB -211G>T variants could be genetic markers to predict FSH response.

CONCLUSIONS

FSH may be helpful to increase sperm production in infertile men, even if the evidence to recommend the use of FSH in this setting is weak. Placebo-controlled clinical trials, considering the FSHB-FSHR haplotype, are needed to define the most effective dosage, the best treatment length, and the criteria to select candidate responder patients.

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Treatment and Male Idiopathic Infertility: Effects on Sperm Parameters and Oxidative Stress Indices according to FSHR c. 2039 A/G and c. -29 G/A Genotypes

Scientific evidence shows that the administration of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to infertile patients with normal serum FSH concentrations improves sperm parameters in oligozoospermic men. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of highly purified urofollitropin (hpFSH) on conventional and bio-functional sperm parameters and on oxidative stress indices in patients with idiopathic infertility. We also evaluated the response to hpFSH on these parameters in relationship to FSHR c. 2039 A/G and FSHR c. -29 G/A genotypes. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 42 patients with idiopathic male infertility, 23 of whom underwent to FSHR c. 2039 A/G and FSHR c. -29 G/A genotyping. Each patient was asked to collect two semen samples before and after administration of 150 IU hpFSH three times a week for 16 weeks. Patients were divided into responders or non-responders based on whether their total sperm count had at least doubled or was less than double at the end of treatment, respectively. Responders showed a significantly higher semen volume, sperm concentration, spermatids, and leukocytes. Non-responders had a significant decrease of the percentage of spermatozoa in early apoptosis after hpFSH administration. Oxidative stress indexes did not differ significantly after FSH administration in both groups. Conventional and bio-functional sperm parameters did not differ in patients with FSHR c. 2039 GG and AA genotypes, and FSHR c. -29 GG genotype both before and after FSH administration. The FSHR c. 2039 and FSHR -29 G/A genotypes and allelic distribution did not differ between responders and non-responders. FSH showed to be capable of ameliorating sperm parameters in about half patients treated, therefore it may be helpful in patients with idiopathic infertility.

Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Action on Spermatogenesis: A Focus on Physiological and Therapeutic Roles

BACKGROUND

Human reproduction is regulated by the combined action of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and the luteinizing hormone (LH) on the gonads. Although FSH is largely used in female reproduction, in particular in women attending assisted reproductive techniques to stimulate multi-follicular growth, its efficacy in men with idiopathic infertility is not clearly demonstrated. Indeed, whether FSH administration improves fertility in patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, the therapeutic benefit in men presenting alterations in sperm production despite normal FSH serum levels is still unclear. In the present review, we evaluate the potential pharmacological benefits of FSH administration in clinical practice.

METHODS

This is a narrative review, describing the FSH physiological role in spermatogenesis and its potential therapeutic action in men.

RESULTS

The FSH role on male fertility is reviewed starting from the physiological control of spermatogenesis, throughout its mechanism of action in Sertoli cells, the genetic regulation of its action on spermatogenesis, until the therapeutic options available to improve sperm production.

CONCLUSION

FSH administration in infertile men has potential benefits, although its action should be considered by evaluating its synergic action with testosterone, and well-controlled, powerful trials are required. Prospective studies and new compounds could be developed in the near future.

FSH treatment in infertile males candidate to assisted reproduction improved sperm DNA fragmentation and pregnancy rate

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether follicle-stimulating hormone treatment improves sperm DNA parameters and pregnancy outcome in infertile male candidates to in-vitro fertilization.Observational study in 166 infertile male partners of couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Eighty-four patients were receiving follicle-stimulating hormone treatment (cases) and 82 refused treatment (controls). Semen parameters, sexual hormones, and sperm nucleus (fluorescence in-situ hybridization, acridine orange, TUNEL, and γH2AX) were evaluated at baseline (T0) and after 3 months (T1), when all subjects underwent assisted reproduction techniques. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance.Compared to baseline, cases showed significant improvements in seminal parameters and DNA fragmentation indexes after follicle-stimulating hormone therapy (all P < 0.05), whereas no changes were observed in controls. Within cases, follicle-stimulating hormone treatment allowed to perform intrauterine insemination in 35 patients with a pregnancy rate of 23.2 %. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed in all controls and in 49 patients from cases, with pregnancy rates of 23.2 and 40.8 %, respectively (P < 0.05). After 3 months (T0 vs. T1) of follicle-stimulating hormone therapy, cases with positive outcome had reduced DNA fragmentation index and lower double strand breaks (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001 vs. negative outcome, respectively).In this observational study, we showed that follicle-stimulating hormone treatment improves sperm DNA fragmentation, which in turn leads to increased pregnancy rates in infertile males undergoing in-vitro fertilization. In particular, double strand breaks (measured with γH2AX test) emerged as the most sensible parameter to follicle-stimulating hormone treatment in predicting reproductive outcome.

Male fertility and skin diseases

Male fertility can be affected by a variety of organs diseases, including the skin. Several genodermatoses affect the skin and several other organs including the male reproductive system, commonly in the form of cryptorchidism and hypogonadism. The most relevant syndromes are associated with dyschromias, such as deSanctis-Cacchione, poikiloderma congenital, LEOPARD, and H syndrome; others with ichthyosis, such as Rud, and trichothiodystrophy; or a group of unrelated genodermatoses, such as ablepharon macrostomia, Coffin-Siris, Gorlin-Goltz, and Werner. Acquired skin diseases may also affect male fertility usually in the form of orchitis or epididymal obstruction or androgen antagonists. These include infections (leprosy and HIV), autoimmune (erythema nodosum leprosum), granulomatous (sarcoidosis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis), nutritional deficiency (zinc), and malignancy. Several therapeutics of skin diseases are notorious for their effects on male fertility, most notably are the cytotoxic drugs (methotrexate), irradiation, and antiandrogens (spironolactone, finasteride). Although the prevalence of these skin diseases is low, the associated male infertility represents a challenge due to the difficulty of its management. Clinical management of the skin diseases should include consideration of their effects not only on the diseases but also on the male reproductive system.

FSH treatment of male idiopathic infertility improves pregnancy rate: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate whether FSH administration to the male partner of infertile couples improves pregnancy rate, spontaneously and/or after assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

METHODS

Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials in which FSH was administered for male idiopathic infertility, compared with placebo or no treatment. Randomization was not considered as an inclusion criterion.

RESULTS

We found 15 controlled clinical studies (614 men treated with FSH and 661 treated with placebo or untreated). Concerning the type of FSH, eight studies used recombinant FSH, whereas seven studies used purified FSH. Nine studies evaluated spontaneous pregnancy rate, resulting in an overall odds ratio (OR) of about 4.5 (CI: 2.17-9.33). Eight studies evaluated pregnancy rate after ART, showing a significant OR of 1.60 (CI: 1.08-2.37). Sub-dividing studies according to the FSH preparations (purified/recombinant), pregnancy rate improvement remained significant for each preparation. Eleven studies considered sperm quality after FSH treatment, finding a significant improvement of sperm concentration (2.66×10(6)/ml, CI: 0.47-4.84), but not of concentration of sperm with progressive motility (1.22×10(6)/ml, CI: -0.07 to 2.52). Three trials evaluated testicular volume, showing a non-significant increase in men treated (1.35 ml, CI: -0.44 to 3.14).

CONCLUSION

The results of controlled clinical trials available in the literature indicate an improvement of pregnancy rate after FSH administration to the male partner of infertile couples, both spontaneously and after ART. However, the heterogeneity of studies, the high risk of bias and the lack of precise criteria to guide FSH administration limit the strength of these results. Future studies should be designed to identify the markers of FSH response which are helpful in the decision-making process. Meanwhile, the use of FSH in the treatment of male infertility should be cautious.

Empirical medical therapy in idiopathic male infertility: Promise or panacea?

Male factors account for 20%-50% of cases of infertility and in 25% of cases, the etiology of male infertility is unknown. Effective treatments are well-established for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, male accessory gland infection, retrograde ejaculation, and positive antisperm antibody. However, the appropriate treatment for idiopathic male infertility is unclear. Empirical medical treatment (EMT) has been used in men with idiopathic infertility and can be divided into two categories based on the mode of action: hormonal treatment and antioxidant supplementation. Hormonal medications consist of gonadotropins, androgens, estrogen receptor blockers, and aromatase inhibitors. Antioxidants such as vitamins, zinc, and carnitines have also been widely used to reduce oxidative stress-induced spermatozoa damage. Although scientifically acceptable evidence of EMT is limited because of the lack of large, randomized, controlled studies, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses have shown that the administration of gonadotropins, anti-estrogens, and oral antioxidants results in a significant increase in the live birth rate compared with control treatments. Therefore, all physicians who treat infertility should bear in mind that EMT can improve semen parameters and subsequent fertility potential through natural intercourse.

Reduced Seminal Concentration of CD45pos Cells after Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Treatment in Selected Patients with Idiopathic Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia

The present study evaluated the conventional sperm parameters and the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells (pan-leukocyte marker) of infertile patients with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT). The patients were arbitrarily divided into three groups treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone FSH: α (Group A = 20 patients), recombinant FSH- β (Group B = 20 patients), and highly purified human FSH (Group C = 14 patients). All treated groups achieved a similar improvement of the main sperm parameters (density, progressive motility, and morphology), but only the increase in the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology was significant compared to the baseline in all three examined groups. Moreover, all groups had a significant reduction of the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells and of the percentage of immature germ cells. Before and after the treatment, the concentration of CD45pos cells showed a positive linear correlation with the percentage of immature germ cells and a negative correlation with the percentage of spermatozoa with regular morphology. These results demonstrate that treatment with FSH is effective in patients with idiopathic OAT and that there are no significant differences between the different preparations. The novelty of this study is in the significant reduction of the concentration of CD45pos cells observed after the treatment.

Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility

BACKGROUND

Male factors leading to subfertility account for at least half of all cases of subfertility worldwide. Although some causes of male subfertility are treatable, treatment of idiopathic male factor subfertility remains empirical. Researchers have used gonadotrophins to improve sperm parameters in idiopathic male factor subfertility with the ultimate goal of increasing birth and pregnancy rates, but results have been conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of systemic follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) on live birth and pregnancy rates when administered to men with idiopathic male factor subfertility .

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register (14 January 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library, Issue 12 of 12, 2012), Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 14 January 2013), Ovid EMBASE (1980 to week 2 of 2013), Ovid PsycINFO (1806 to week 2 of 2013), trial registers for ongoing and registered trials at ClinicalTrials.gov (19 January 2013), the World Health Organisation International Trials Registry Platform (19 January 2013), The Cochrane Library Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (19 January 2013) and OpenGrey for grey literature from Europe (19 January 2013). Searches were not limited by language. Bibliographies of included and excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which gonadotrophins were compared with placebo or no treatment for participants with idiopathic male factor subfertility.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data on live birth, pregnancy and adverse effects. We included data on pregnancies that occurred during or after gonadotrophin therapy. Study authors and pharmaceutical companies were asked to provide missing and unpublished data and/or additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs with 456 participants and variable treatment and follow-up periods were included. From the limited data, the live birth rate per couple randomly assigned (27% vs 0%; Peto odds ratio (OR) 9.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 73.75, one study, 30 participants, very low-quality evidence) and the spontaneous pregnancy rate per couple randomly assigned (16% vs 7%; Peto OR 4.94, 95% CI 2.13 to 11.44, five studies, 412 participants, I(2) = 0%, moderate-quality evidence) were significantly higher in men receiving gonadotrophin treatment than in men receiving placebo or no treatment. No significant difference between groups was noted when intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) was performed. None of the included studies reported miscarriage rates, and adverse events data were sparse.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Encouraging preliminary data suggest a beneficial effect on live birth and pregnancy of gonadotrophin treatment for men with idiopathic male factor subfertility, but because the numbers of trials and participants are small, evidence is insufficient to allow final conclusions. Large multi-centre trials with adequate numbers of participants are needed.

Follicle-stimulating hormone treatment in normogonadotropic infertile men

Several empirical treatments have been proposed to treat idiopathic infertility in men, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). FSH administration is effective in patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, which suggests it might be useful in patients with oligozoospermia who have normal FSH levels. Indeed, many studies have evaluated the efficacy of FSH administration in these patients, several of which have shown improvements in sperm parameters. By contrast, other studies have not reported any significant effect of FSH administration on conventional sperm parameters, although some of have reported the normalization of spermatozoon ultrastructural morphology, as well as reductions in DNA fragmentation, production of reactive oxygen species and aneuploidy. Contemporary studies suggest that the response to FSH treatment in oligozoospermic patients might, at least partially, reflect polymorphisms of the FSH receptor gene. Thus, FSH administration in oligozoospermic men with normal serum FSH levels might be efficacious only in selected patients. For this reason, additional studies are needed to determine the predictive factors and clinical conditions that can be used to identify patients who could benefit from FSH treatment.

Prognostic value of serum progesterone and LH values on the day of hCG administration in IUI GnRH antagonist cycles

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effect of LH surge and progesterone rise in IUI cycles under gonadotropin stimulation with GnRH antagonist coadministration on pregnancy rates (PR).

STUDY DESIGN

The population under study consisted of 152 women prospectively studied and subjected to IUI.

RESULTS

The higher the progesterone cutoff value, the lower the PR were 26.5% and 10.9% when the cutoff was 1 ng/mL, 26.0% and 8.6% when the cutoff was 1.2 ng/mL, 25.6% and 7.1% when the cutoff was 1.4 ng/mL and 25.3% and 0% when the cutoff was 1.6 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

In IUI cycles under GnRH antagonist coadministration, serum progesterone levels over 1.0 ng/mL are associated with lower PR, the higher the progesterone levels, the lower the PR.

Effects of endogenous FSH on normal human spermatogenesis in adults

Unilateral orchiectomy (UO) in adult bonnet monkeys and boars elicits a compensatory increase in size and sperm production of the remaining testis. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a similar effect is evident also in humans. We prospectively studied 50 patients from October 2003 to December 2005 who underwent UO for seminomatous tumour, with sperm concentration >20 × 10(6) /mL or total sperm count >40 × 10(6) at diagnosis and without elevation of serum tumour markers. Patients were followed-up with surveillance and they were studied at the time of diagnosis of testicular cancer (T(-1) ), 1 month after unilateral orchiectomy (T(0) ) and yearly for 3 years (T(1) , T(2) , T(3) ) with semen analysis, measurement of plasma levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), inhibin B, total testosterone, and oestradiol and ultrasonographic scanning of the remaining testis. A decline in circulating inhibin B and an increase in FSH levels were evident 1 month after UO. The elevation of FSH was maintained up to 3 years and was associated with a significant increase in testicular volume of 19 and 30%, 2 and 3 years after UO respectively. Although patients had normozoospermia at the time of diagnosis of testicular cancer, they showed a statistically significant increase in total sperm count at T(2) and T(3) with respect to T(-1) and T(0.) In conclusion, we showed that in humans, the testes are not normally operating at their maximal potential in terms of spermatogenesis. Therefore, in physiological situations, FSH secretion is insufficient to stimulate spermatogenesis to its ceiling. A sustained endogenous increase in FSH secretion might drive human testes towards their maximal function.

Recombinant FSH in the treatment of oligozoospermia

BACKGROUND

FSH plays a crucial role in human reproduction. Treatment with gonadotrophins has been shown to be effective in males affected by hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. The success of this treatment has brought about the utilization of the same therapy in infertile oligozoospermic subjects, aimed at obtaining increased sperm count. This physiological role in spermatogenesis has induced various attempts to treat idiopathic oligozoospermic men with FSH, often inducing the restoration of normal spermatogenesis and spontaneous pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical efficacy of recombinant FSH in male infertility.

METHODS

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic properties, efficacy and safety of this hormone preparation, on the basis of the data published in literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Recombinant FSH is effective, safe and well tolerated. Treatment with this hormone may represent a valid tool for infertile men. However it should be performed on selected patients utilizing some predictive parameters able to identify a priori responder subjects with high probability.

Follicle-stimulating hormone treatment in oligozoospermic patients

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) plays a crucial role in human reproduction. Already, in the fetal and neonatal developmental stages, FSH activates the proliferation of the Sertoli cells and successively, in the pubertal phase, induces the mitotic activity of the spermatogonia and supports cellular differentiation to the round spermatid stage. This physiological role in spermatogenesis has induced various attempts to treat idiopathic oligozoospermic men with FSH. It is well known that treatment with gonadotrophins is very effective in subjects affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, often leading to the restoration of normal spermatogenesis. The success of this treatment in these men has brought the utilization of the therapy with FSH in infertile oligozoospermic subjects, aimed at obtaining a quantitative increase in sperm count. However, the results obtained so far are still controversial. In this article, the literature is reviewed and the authors' experience on using FSH treatment in oligozoospermic subjects is discussed.

Hormonal treatment of male infertility: FSH

FSH plays a crucial role in spermatogenesis. In the fetal and neonatal development stages, FSH activates the proliferation of the Sertoli cells and successively, during the pubertal phase, it influences the mitotic activity of the spermatogonia and encourages cellular differentiation, until arrival at the round spermatid stage. Because of its physiological role in spermatogenesis, various attempts have been made to treat idiopathic oligozoospermic men with FSH. However, the results obtained so far are still controversial. In this research, attention was focused on the possible criteria able to predict a seminal response to this specific hormonal treatment. Furthermore, the effectiveness of FSH therapy was evaluated in terms of sperm count and pregnancy rate. Thus far, based on more recent knowledge about the FSH receptor gene, the authors have correlated different polymorphisms of this gene with the outcome of FSH treatment. In this paper, the literature is reviewed and the authors' experience on using FSH in male infertility is discussed.

Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility

BACKGROUND

Male factor infertility accounts for 50% of all infertility. The treatment of idiopathic male infertility is empirical. Urinary, purified, and recombinant gonadotrophins have been used to improve sperm parameters in idiopathic male infertility with the goal of increasing pregnancy rates. Research addressing pregnancy rates in partners of men treated with gonadotrophins has had conflicting results and needs to be analysed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of gonadotrophin administration in men with idiopathic subfertility in improving spontaneous pregnancy rate and in assisted reproductive technique cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (31 May 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2007), EMBASE and Biological Abstracts (1980 to Week 21 2007). Searches were not limited by language. The bibliographies of included, excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials. Authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for missing and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Truly randomised controlled trials where gonadotrophins were administered for the treatment of idiopathic male subfertility with reporting of pregnancy rates were included in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. We analysed data regarding pregnancy occurring within three months after gonadotrophin therapy.

MAIN RESULTS

Four RCTs with 278 participants were included in the analysis. None of the studies had an adequate sample size and they had variable follow-up periods. None of the studies reported live birth or miscarriage rates. Compared to placebo or no treatment, gonadotrophins showed a significantly higher pregnancy rate per couple randomized within three months of completing therapy ( OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.09).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The number of trials and participants is insufficient to draw final conclusions. A large multicenter study with adequate power is needed.

Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

A comparison of the effectiveness of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles for patients with unexplained infertility was performed.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-one patients were prospectively randomized using computer-generated random numbers into three groups: 81 in the Follitropin alpha (Group I), 80 in the urinary FSH (uFSH) (Group II) and 80 in the hMG (Group III). The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate with duration of stimulation, total gonadotrophin dose, number of dominant follicles, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate being secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the rFSH group (25.9% in Follitropin alpha, 13.8% in uFSH and 12.5% in HMG groups; P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in terms of duration of stimulation, but mean FSH dose consumed per cycle was significantly lower in the recombinant FSH (rFSH) group compared with others (825 IU in Follitropin alpha, 1107 IU in uFSH and 1197 IU in HMG groups; P = 0.001). The number of follicles > or =16 mm diameter was significantly higher in the rFSH group compared with the uFSH and HMG groups (2.6 in Follitropin alpha, 1.3 in uFSH and 1.4 in HMG groups; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

rFSH may result in a better outcome in IUI cycles for unexplained infertility.

Effects of high doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in the treatment of male factor infertility: results of a pilot study

We performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study on seminal parameters and endocrine profile of 30 normogonadotropic patients with male factor infertility to assess the efficacy of treatment with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) at high doses (300 IU on alternate days) for a period of >or=4 months. The treatment induced a marked increase in sperm count, a slight increase in sperm motility, no change in sperm morphology, and an evident increase only in FSH serum levels, showing that a prolonged treatment with rhFSH at high doses led to an evident improvement of sperm count in normogonadotropic infertile patients with idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia.

Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility

BACKGROUND

Male factor infertility accounts for 50% of infertility. The treatment of idiopathic male infertility is empirical. Urinary, purified, and recombinant gonadotrophins have been used to improve sperm parameters in idiopathic male infertility with the goal of increasing pregnancy rates. Research addressing pregnancy rates in partners of men treated with gonadotrophins has had conflicting results and needs to be analysed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of gonadotrophin administration to men with idiopathic subfertility on spontaneous pregnancy rate and in assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (19 November 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), EMBASE and Biological Abstracts (1980 to November 2004). Searches were not limited by language. The bibliographies of included, excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials. Authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for missing and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Truly randomised controlled trials where gonadotrophins were administered for the treatment of idiopathic male subfertility with reporting of pregnancy rates were included in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. We analysed data regarding pregnancy occurring within 3 months after gonadotrophin therapy.

MAIN RESULTS

Four RCTs with 278 participant were included in the analysis. None of the studies had an adequate sample size and they had variable follow-up periods. None of the studies reported live birth or miscarriage rates. Compared to placebo or no treatment, gonadotrophins showed a significantly higher pregnancy rate per couple randomized within 3 months of completing therapy (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.09). Pregnancy rate was 13.4% (19/142) in the gonadotrophin group and 4.4% (6/136) in the control group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The number of trials and participants is insufficient to draw final conclusions. A large multicenter study with adequate power is needed.

Medical treatment to improve sperm quality

Approximately 30% of cases of couple infertility are due to a male factor. Several conditions can interfere with spermatogenesis and reduce sperm quality and production. Treatable conditions, such as hypogonadism, varicocele, infections and obstructions, should be diagnosed and corrected, but many aspects of male factor infertility remain unclear. Various agents have been used in the attempt to increase the fertility potential of subjects with idiopathic oligoteratoasthenozoospermia. The rationale of medical treatment to improve sperm quality in these subjects has been questioned by the introduction of assisted reproductive technologies. However, there is now growing awareness of the importance of good quality spermatozoa for embryonic development and higher birth rates. Confounding factors in assessing the efficacy of male infertility treatments have erroneously inflated the superiority of assisted reproductive technologies over conventional approaches. A systematic review is given of relevant randomized controlled trials and effects on semen parameters. The analysis reveals that although results are heterogeneous, gonadotrophins, anti-oestrogens, carnitine and trace elements may be beneficial in improving sperm quality, although their effect on pregnancy rate remains controversial. The most common drug regimens are compared and an estimate of the results expected from these treatments provided.

Treatment of male idiopathic infertility with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of treatment with FSH on seminal parameters and spontaneous pregnancy in male infertility.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

Infertility center at a university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred twelve men affected by idiopathic oligozoospermia.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomized into two groups: 62 subjects were treated with 100 IU of recombinant human FSH on alternate days for 3 months, and 50 patients did not receive any treatment. Semen analysis was performed in all subjects at the end of this period of treatment and after the following 3 months. Subjects who had not reached spontaneous pregnancy underwent assisted reproductive techniques.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Seminal parameters, testicular cytologic analysis, FSH, LH, T, and inhibin B concentrations.

RESULT(S)

The treatment group considered as a whole did not show modifications in sperm parameters. However, a subgroup of these (30, 48.4%) had a significant increase of sperm count (responder group). In the period including 3 months after the withdrawal of FSH therapy, we observed a significantly higher spontaneous pregnancy rate in the responder group (5 of 30 [16.7%]) with respect to nonresponder and nontreated groups (1 of 32 [3.1%] and 2 of 50 [4.0%], respectively). Furthermore, the improvement of seminal parameters in the responder group allowed these patients to undergo less frequent IVF-ET/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

CONCLUSION(S)

Results from this controlled, randomized clinical trial show that FSH therapy does not improve sperm concentration or pregnancy rate when infertile male patients are chosen solely by the clinical criteria of idiopathic oligospermia and normal FSH concentration. Subgroup analysis, however, does indicate that patients without maturation arrest in addition to the clinical scenario do benefit from medical therapy.

One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patients' husbands: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of performing two inseminations per cycle in IUI with husband's sperm compared with one insemination per cycle.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

SETTING

Randomized and prospective trials comparing two inseminations vs. one insemination per cycle in IUI with husband's sperm, retrieved by MEDLINE and Cochrane Library searches (1966-2001) and a manual search of the abstracts of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine annual meetings (1990-2001).

PATIENT(S)

A total of 865 patients underwent 1156 cycles of IUI with husband's sperm.

INTERVENTION(S)

After different ovarian stimulation protocols, one or two inseminations were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate per cycle. Detected studies were tested for homogeneity. Because heterogeneity was observed, DerSimonian-Laird relative risk with alleatory effects was used.

RESULT(S)

Six randomized and prospective trials involving 865 patients and 1156 cycles were identified. There was remarkable heterogeneity among the different studies concerning methodology, especially regarding ovarian cycle management and the timing of inseminations. Although the pregnancy rate per cycle was somewhat higher in the two-inseminations-per-cycle group (14.9% vs. 11.4%), there were no statistically significant differences (relative risk = 1.34; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.99).

CONCLUSION(S)

No significant differences were observed when two inseminations per cycle were performed, compared with one insemination. There was great heterogeneity concerning ovarian management and insemination timing. This heterogeneity hampered the analysis. We detected a better pregnancy rate with two inseminations vs. one insemination when clomiphene citrate with or without gonadotropins and 5000 IU of hCG were used. More studies are necessary to ascertain whether this is true or merely an artifact from the multiple subgroups analysis.

A new look at the medical management of infertility

Effective therapies are available for the treatment of infertility owing to specific causes. Most hormonal imbalances can be readily identified and successfully treated. The treatment of men with unexplained idiopathic infertility remains difficult. The availability of a multitude of agents ranging from hormones to nutritional supplements emphasizes the fact that none are consistently effective. There is no good way to predict which patients will respond to a specific treatment. Idiopathic infertility may result from multiple discrete defects in sperm generation and maturation that are as yet unidentified. A better understanding of these defects will yield more effective treatment options and appropriate triage of patients to specific therapeutic regimens. Assisted reproductive techniques remain an option for patients with idiopathic male infertility; however, they are expensive and treat the female partner for a male problem. Multiple gestations and other complications are not infrequent. Initial management should be directed at improving the quality of semen to facilitate natural conception. Specific abnormalities should be corrected. If empiric pharmacologic therapy is to be used, treatment should last at least 3 to 6 months to incorporate a full 74-day spermatogenic cycle. The infertile couple should be advised of the inconsistent response to therapy and the low conception rate that may follow when compared with the results of ART. When empiric therapy is decided upon, antiestrogens may be used and are effective in a subset of patients. The authors prefer to use clomiphene citrate, 25 mg per day. The dose may be increased to 50 or 75 mg to raise testosterone levels to the upper normal range. Lack of a significant improvement in semen parameters or of a pregnancy after a 3- to 6-month treatment period may be an indication to proceed with ART.

Present and future therapeutic strategies for idiopathic oligozoospermia

The effectiveness of medical treatment for idiopathic oligozoospermia (IO) has been at best doubtful until now and a logical consequence of this unsatisfactory situation has been the partial displacement of this approach by assisted reproduction techniques. This state of affairs has resulted from insufficient investigation, inappropriately designed clinical trials and consistent disregard for the principles of evidence-based medicine. Protocol-related shortcomings and wrong interpretation of the data available have also been some of the all too frequent problems encountered in this therapeutic approach. In this rather misty situation, it appears that, of the therapeutic agents used so far, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (mainly FSH-secretagogues) may exert some beneficial effects on a number of biological endpoints related to spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. The short and medium term prospects of medical treatment for IO rest mainly with improvement of investigative procedures to a higher degree of sophistication, with emphasis placed on identifying the causes rather than the results of dysfunction so that a better selection of candidates can be made. Moreover, the introduction of prognostic indices for evaluation of the beneficial effects of a therapeutic agent may be of paramount importance. Finally, a better assessment of the preparations available and, possibly, the introduction of new more specific agents may also be an important step forward in this field. This type of large-scale effort should not be left to individual investigators or special centres working independently, but it may come under the auspices of a central regulating agency so that undisputed results from large, multicentre and uniform studies might be obtained, if medical treatment is to remain a good option. In this context, it may also be emphasized that andrology's main task should always be to treat the male with the problem rather than his healthy female partner, whenever this is possible.

Recombinant human FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH: a randomized study in intrauterine insemination with husbands' spermatozoa

A randomized trial was carried out comparing recombinant FSH (rFSH) and highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) with husbands' spermatozoa. A total of 45 women received rFSH (139 cycles), while 46 women received uFSH (155 cycles). The starting dose was 150 IU/day s.c., beginning on the second day, and on days 6-7 the dose was adjusted according to ovarian response, assessed by vaginal ultrasound and plasma oestradiol concentration. The pregnancy rate according to the intention to treat was 57.8% in rFSH versus 52.2% in uFSH, the corrected pregnancy rates 56.8% and 52.2%, and the cumulative pregnancy rates 69.6% and 61.0%, but the differences were not statistically significant. The per cycle pregnancy rate was 18.12% in rFSH and 15.48% in u-FSH, also not statistically significant. In the rFSH group, the consumption of FSH ampoules per cycle was significantly lower (19.20 +/- 7.02 versus 23. 80 +/- 10.78; P < 0.0001). The ratio of oestradiol/FSH ampoules was significantly higher in rFSH (56.45 +/- 31.26 versus 46.41 +/- 29. 25; P < 0.001). These data indicate that, in IUI cycles, rFSH has a higher potency than uFSH.