High dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (ganirelix) may prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome caused by ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

Dynamic Interactions Between LH and Testosterone in Healthy Community-Dwelling Men: Impact of Age and Body Composition

BACKGROUND

Aging is associated with diminished testosterone (Te) secretion, which may be attributed to Leydig cell dysfunction, decreased pituitary stimulation, and altered Te feedback.

OBJECTIVE

To study all regulatory nodes-gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and Leydig cell-in the same cohort of healthy men.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a placebo-controlled, blinded, prospectively randomized cross-over study in 40 men, age range 19 to 73 years, and body mass index (BMI) range 20 to 34.3 kg/m2. A submaximal dose of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix was used to assess outflow of GnRH, by calculating the difference between LH output during the control arm and ganirelix arm. Ketoconazole (a steroidogenic inhibitor) was used to estimate feedback, by the difference in LH output during the ketoconazole and control arm. High-dose ganirelix and repeated LH infusions were used to measure testicular responsivity. Blood sampling was performed at 10-minute intervals.

RESULTS

There were age-related, but not body composition-related decreases in estimated GnRH secretion, the feedback strength of Te on LH, and Leydig cell responsivity to LH, accompanied by changes in approximate entropy. Bioavailable Te levels were negatively related to both age and computed tomography (CT)-estimated abdominal visceral mass (AVF), without interaction between these variables. The LH response to a submaximal dose of GnRH was independent of age and AVF.

CONCLUSION

Advancing age is associated with (1) attenuated bioavailable Te secretion caused by diminished GnRH outflow and not by decreased GnRH responsivity of the gonadotrope, (2) diminished testicular responsivity to infused LH pulses, and (3) partial compensation by diminished Te feedback on central gonadotropic regulation.

Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: impact on contemporary donor egg practice and future advances

Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have driven progress in the donor egg field since the birth of the first baby derived from a donor egg in 1983. Over time, donor oocytes have become an increasingly used option for patients unable to conceive with autologous oocytes. In donor egg, the unique separation of the oocyte source and recipient uterus has created a model that has propelled advances in ART. Progressive ART innovations that have optimized the oocyte donor and resulting embryo include the following: evaluation of ovarian reserve, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimens that reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, blastocyst culture, oocyte cryopreservation, and preimplantation genetic testing. For donor egg recipients, methods to optimize the endometrium to maximize implantation include endometrial receptivity testing, immunologic donor-recipient matching, and increased understanding of the uterine microbiome.

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist post-ovulation trigger in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

The purpose of this paper is to assimilate all data pertaining to the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in in vitro fertilization cycles after ovulation trigger to reduce the symptoms of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all studies performed on the use of a GnRH antagonist in IVF cycle post-ovulation trigger with patients at high risk for OHSS. Ten studies were identified and reviewed. Descriptions of the studies and their individual results are presented in the following manuscript. Due to significant heterogeneity among the studies, it was not possible to perform a group analysis. The use of GnRH antagonists post-ovulation trigger for treatment of OHSS has been considered for almost 20 years, though research into its use is sparse. Definitive conclusions and recommendations cannot be made at this time, though preliminary data from these trials demonstrate the potential for GnRH antagonists to play a role in the treatment of OHSS in certain patient populations.

Analysis of the impact of intravenous LH pulses versus continuous LH infusion on testosterone secretion during GnRH-receptor blockade

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulsatility is required for optimal luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, but whether LH pulsatility is required for physiological testosterone (T) secretion is not known. To test the postulate that pulses of recombinant human (rh) LH stimulate greater T secretion than continuous infusion of the same dose, a potent selective GnRH antagonist was administered overnight to 19 healthy men ages 18-49 yr. Subjects then received saline or rhLH intravenously continuously or as 6-min pulses intravenously every 1 or 2 h at the same total dose. Blood was sampled every 10 min for 10 h to quantify T responses. For the four interventions, the descending rank order of mean LH and mean T concentrations was 1-h = 2-h rhLH pulses > continuous rhLH > saline (P < 10(-3)). Plateau LH and T concentrations correlated positively (R(2) = 0.943, P = 0.029) as did LH concentrations and LH half-lives (R(2) = 0.962, P = 0.019). Percentage pulsatile T secretion assessed by deconvolution analysis (Keenan DM, Takahashi PY, Liu PY, Roebuck PD, Nehra AX, Iranmanesh A, Veldhuis JD. Endocrinology 147: 2817-2828, 2006) was the highest (P = 0.019), and half-time to attain peak T concentrations was the shortest (P < 10(-6)), for 1-h rhLH pulses. Approximate entropy (a pattern-regularity measure) revealed more orderly T secretion for 1- than 2-h rhLH pulses (P = 0.0076). Accordingly, a pulsatile LH signal, while not obligatory to maintain mean T concentrations, controls the mean plasma LH concentration and determines quantifiable patterns of T secretion. These data introduce the question whether blood T patterns in turn supervise distinctive target-tissue responses.

[Coasting and ovarian stimulation protocols in high-responder patients undergoing assisted conception]

Over-responsive patients are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation, which may lead to severe complications. The choice of ovarian stimulation protocol or the use of a coasting (gonadotrophins suspension) with its associated risk of too strong ovarian response will be discussed herein. As for in vitro fertilization stimulation protocols, the best are probably those which use steadily increasing low doses of gonadotrophins, associated to GnRH agonists (low-dose protocols) or those which complete a double hypophyseal inhibition (estro-progestative association and GnRH agonists). GnRH antagonists may also reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation, by estradiol drop. Outside the context of in vitro fertilization GnRH continuous administration or low -dose gonadotrophin stimulation are the best options. A coasting will be performed when an excess follicle response is documented. Under strict hormonal follow-up and within four days it allows achieving a high rate of pregnancy with a lower risk of hyperstimulation. Compared to other therapies of hyperstimulation syndrome, the coasting allows to avoid cycle cancellation or freezing of all embryos.

GnRH antagonists

Ovarian stimulation is an important step in the success rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF) allowing multiple follicular growth, several oocytes and consequently more embryos. The combination of GnRH-antagonists (GnRH-ant) and gonadotrophins is now available for clinical use and represent a valid alternative to classical protocol with GnRH agonist. GnRH-antagonists induce a direct block of GnRH receptor with a rapid decrease in LH and FSH, preventing LH surge. Two protocols has been designed for assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment: multiple-dose protocol and a single-dose. Both protocols are simply, efficacious, started in the late follicular phase and do not have side effects. A review of GnRH-antagonist applications in ART cycles are presented. Smaller doses of gonadotrophins, shorter stimulation period and lower ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) incidence are reported in literature using GnRH-antagonist compared to agonist. Triggering of ovulation, the use in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and poor reponders patients are other interesting indication. Regarding to pregnancy rate and potentially adverse effects of drugs on endometrium or implantation needed more data.

Assisted reproduction in the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome

Treatment of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with assisted reproductive techniques is a great challenge for the infertility specialist. Patients with PCOS demonstrate many problems, such as excessive body weight and hyperinsulinaemia, that render management more complex. Prior to treatment with IVF, the PCOS patient should be thoroughly evaluated for disclosure of endometrial neoplasia, hyperinsulinaemia, and other general health related problems. Ovarian stimulation for IVF carries the risks of overstimulation and severe hyperstimulation, which should be avoidable in most cases with preventive measures. The outcome in terms of pregnancy and implantation rates is similar for patients with PCOS when compared with patients undergoing IVF for other indications. There are some questions regarding oocyte and embryo quality in women with PCOS. This manifests itself in lower fertilization rate and decreased embryo quality in some studies. However, increased numbers of oocytes available for insemination or ICSI compensate for decreased fertilization rates and embryo quality. More recent studies suggest higher cumulative conception rates in women with PCOS when compared with controls. In-vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes retrieved from non-stimulated or minimally stimulated cycles represents a viable option that should be considered seriously when assisted conception is attempted. Results of IVM, however, should be improved further and generalized before the technique can be advocated as the initial treatment approach in these patients.

Luteolysis induced by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is the key to prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review the available knowledge on the use of GnRH agonist for ovulation triggering as a means to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

DESIGN(S)

Review of pertinent English language studies published over the past 15 years.

RESULT(S)

The available literature suggests that while GnRH agonist effectively induces final oocyte maturation and ovulation, it also completely and reliably prevents clinically significant OHSS. The mechanism of action in the context of OHSS prevention involves complete, quick, and irreversible luteolysis

CONCLUSION(S)

Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols based on GnRH antagonist to prevent premature LH rise and GnRH agonist for ovulation triggering provide a safe and OHSS-free clinical environment. Adequate luteal support compensates for luteolysis and assures good clinical outcome. The fertility community is urged to adopt these protocols. This will make OHSS a disease of the past.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: strategies for prevention

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious, iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation. The following report is a review of traditional and new strategies to prevent the development of OHSS. Techniques such as reducing the ovarian stimulus, coasting and cryopreservation are discussed. Other more investigative strategies are also summarized, including follicular aspiration, in-vitro maturation of immature oocytes, the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to trigger ovulation and the use of volume expanders such as hydroxyethyl starch. In addition, a review of the internal experience with OHSS at the authors' institution is described. All these preventative approaches are based on current understanding of the physiologic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of OHSS.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and reproductive medicine

The hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is a key regulator of the reproductive system, mainly through its effects on pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues are modifications of the natural decapeptide, being either agonists (GnRHa) or antagonists. GnRHa may imitate the native hormone and induce an endogenous LH surge; however, sustained treatment with GnRHa results in complete refractoriness of LH and FSH production. This aspect of GnRHa action is the main application of the GnRHa in reproduction today. The hypogonadotropic hypogonadal state that results from the sustained treatment is the basis for additional applications of the GnRHa. The agonists appear to be effective, to some extent, for the treatment of endometriosis and were proved to be beneficial prior to surgery for fibroma uteri. GnRHa is used in assisted reproduction for both induction of an endogenous LH surge and for induction of ovulation, and its capacity to cause refractoriness of the pituitary may be used to avoid a premature LH surge. It is suggested that the GnRHa have a direct effect on ovarian steroidogenesis, which is independent of its action on the pituitary. This unwanted effect and other possible drawbacks of the agonists are thought to be eliminated with the use of the antagonists. The mechanism of action of these antagonists is through competitive blocking of the GnRH receptor, which results in a rapid but reversible suppression of gonadotropin secretion. As for GnRHa, GnRH antagonists have been proven effective to prevent the LH surge and to reduce the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles.

Gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-receptor antagonists

Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the pituitary secretion of both luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and thus controls the hormonal and reproductive function of the gonads. Blockade of GnRH effects may be wanted for a variety of reasons-eg, to prevent untimely luteinisation during assisted reproduction or in the treatment of sex-hormone-dependent disorders. Selective blockade of LH/FSH secretion and subsequent chemical castration have previously been achieved by desensitising the pituitary to continuously administered GnRH or by giving long-acting GnRH agonists. Only recently have GnRH-receptor antagonists, that immediately block GnRH's effects, been developed for clinical use with acceptable pharmacokinetic, safety, and commercial profiles. In assisted reproduction, these compounds seem to be as effective as established therapy but with shorter treatment times, less use of gonadotropic hormones, improved patient acceptance, and fewer follicles and oocytes. All current indications for GnRH-agonist desensitisation may prove to be indications for a GnRH antagonist, including endometriosis, leiomyoma, and breast cancer in women, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatic carcinoma in men, and central precocious puberty in children. However, the best clinical evidence so far has been in assisted reproduction and prostate cancer.

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: ovarian actions of GnRH antagonists

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, cetrorelix and ganirelix, have both been approved for ovarian stimulation to prevent a premature LH surge. Since GnRH receptors and their gene expression have been detected in human ovary, concern has risen over whether GnRH antagonists might affect ovarian function. Three large trials which compared GnRH agonists (used in the standard protocol worldwide), with the new antagonist treatment found no significant differences concerning the most important goals, e.g. pregnancy rate, fertilization and quality of oocytes. However, the concentration of oestradiol, and the pregnancy and implantation rates were lower in GnRH antagonist-treated patients. These findings again fuelled the debate about the possible extrapituitary effects of GnRH antagonists. Here, we review the conflicting data in the literature on the ovarian effects of GnRH antagonists and discuss our own results. In our view, it is unlikely that GnRH antagonists have a relevant impact on ovarian steroidogenesis and function; however, GnRH antagonists may exert other effects on the ovary.

Effect of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix on cyclic adenosine monophosphate accumulation of human granulosa-lutein cells

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the GnRH antagonist ganirelix exerts an effect on cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production of human granulosa-lutein (GL) cells in vitro.

DESIGN

In vitro cell culture study.

SETTING

Research laboratory of a university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Mural GL and cumulus cells were obtained from 15 patients on whom controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was being performed for intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

Mural GL and cumulus cells were cultured for 48 hours with and without 1 nM ganirelix or triptorelin. For the last 6 hours, the cells were either exposed to 1-5 IU hCG or left unstimulated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

At the end of the culturing period, the intracellular and extracellular cAMP accumulations were measured by an (125)I-scintillation proximity assay.

RESULT(S)

hCG induced dose-dependent increases in total cAMP accumulation. Stimulation with 1 IU/mL hCG resulted in 9-fold and 13-fold increases, and 5 IU/mL hCG resulted in 19-fold and 14-fold increases in total cAMP release from cumulus and mural GL cells, respectively. On the other hand, treatments with 1 nM GnRH antagonist ganirelix and 1 nM GnRH agonist triptorelin did not exert any significant changes on the basal and hCG-stimulated cAMP accumulation of mural GL cells and cumulus cells as compared with controls.

CONCLUSION(S)

Ganirelix does not influence basal and hCG-stimulated cAMP accumulation of human GL cells in vitro. cAMP is apparently not involved in the mechanism of action of GnRH analogs in human ovary.

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.

Can we advise ovulation induction in patients with SLE?

The prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has greatly improved during the last two decades, now allowing most patients to have a very long survival including a satisfactory quality of life. Initially considered contraindicated in SLE due to its overwhelming risks, pregnancy is nowadays allowed in a majority of patients, and fair results are usually obtained under appropriate management (1-3). Consequently, patients thought to have infertility ask the question of a possible therapy, i.e. ovulation induction (OI) associated or not with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Considering the importance of estrogens in the pathogenesis of the disease, the use of such procedures raise several questions in SLE. Though data remain to date extremely scarce, the theoretical and practical aspects of OI in SLE will be briefly reviewed here.