Attitude of potential users in Sicily towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis for beta-thalassaemia and aneuploidies

Assessment of attitudes towards the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a single center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the attitudes of the general public in Saudi Arabia regarding both medical and non-medical applications of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). The study was conducted in King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital (KASCH) in Riyadh with a sample size of 377. Demographic information was collected, and attitudes towards applications of PGD were assessed using a pre-validated self-administered questionnaire. Out of the total sample size, 230 (61%) were males, 258 (68%) were married, 235 (63%) had one child or more, and 255 (68%) were older than 30 years of age representing the majority of participants. Only 87 (23%) of participants reported prior experience with PGD. Personally, knowing someone who had a prior experience with PGD was associated with higher attitude scores (more favorable attitudes towards PGD) (p-value = 0.04). The findings of this study indicate that our sample of Saudi individuals generally had a positive attitude towards the use of PGD.

Specialist physicians' referral behavior regarding preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene disorders: Is there room to grow?

Objective

To assess whether primary care specialists’ demographics, specialty, and knowledge of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) influence their practice patterns.

Design

Cross-sectional survey study.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patient(s)

Not applicable.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Objective PGT-M knowledge, subjective comfort with PGT-related topics, PGT care practices (discussions/referrals), and PGT-M implementation barriers.

Result(s)

Our survey had 145 respondents: 65 obstetrician/gynecologists, 36 internists, and 44 pediatricians. Overall, 88% believed that patients at a risk of passing on genetic disorders should be provided PGT-M information. However, few discussed PGT-M with their patients (24%) or referred them for testing (23%). Over half (63%) believed that the lack of physician knowledge was a barrier to PGT use. In terms of subjective comfort with PGT, only 1 in 5 physicians felt familiar enough with the topic to answer patient questions. There were higher odds of discussing (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–5.87) or referring for PGT (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.41–4.51) for each additional 0.5 correct answers to PGT knowledge-related questions. The odds of referring patients for PGT-M were the highest among obstetrician/gynecologists compared with those among the internists and pediatricians.

Conclusion(s)

Physician specialty and PGT knowledge were associated with PGT-M care delivery practices. Although most specialists believed in equipping at-risk patients with PGT-M information, <1 in 4 discussed or referred patients for PGT. The low levels of PGT-related care among providers may be owed to inadequate knowledge of and comfort with the topic. An opportunity to promote greater understanding of PGT-M among primary care specialists exists and can in turn improve the use of referrals to PGT-M services.

In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: the need for expanded insurance coverage

Technological advances in genetic testing have enabled prospective parents to learn about their risk of passing a genetic condition to their future children. One option for those who want to ensure that their biological children do not inherit a genetic condition is to create embryos through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and use a technique called preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation. Unfortunately, due to its high cost, IVF-with-PGT is out of reach for the vast majority of Americans. This article addresses an issue that has been underexplored in the medical ethics literature: the lack of insurance coverage for IVF-with-PGT.Within the US system, a key concept in insurance is that of medically necessary care, which broadly consists of diagnostic services and treatment services. In this article, I argue that IVF-with-PGT could be classified as either a diagnostic service or as a treatment service. To make this case, I show that IVF-with-PGT is similar to other types of services that are often covered by US insurance providers. In light of these similarities, I argue that the current system is inconsistent with respect to what is-and is not-covered by insurance. To promote consistency and fairness in coverage, like cases should be treated alike-starting with greater coverage for IVF-with-PGT.

Knowledge, attitude and ethical consideration of Chinese couples requesting preimplantation genetic testing in Hong Kong

AIM

Increasing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles are being performed in Hong Kong. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and ethical consideration of Chinese couples toward PGT.

METHODS

Couples requesting PGT between June 2013 and March 2014 were invited to complete a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Total 49 couples (49 women, 47 men) completed the questionnaires. Eighteen couples (37%) were waiting for PGT (pre-PGT group), 15 couples (31%) were undergoing PGT (PGT group) and 16 couples (32%) had completed at least one PGT cycle (post-PGT group). Only 53% of the couples could tell the recurrent risk, and 31% (with monogenic disorders) could tell the mode of inheritance of their condition. The acceptability of PGT (>80%) and attitude toward the embryo fate (58-78%) were good. The post-PGT group had more concern than the PGT and pre-PGT groups on the prenatal diagnostic testing (**P = 0.007). 12.5% of the couples worried about the transfer of healthy embryos with carrier state and they all had monogenic disorders. If the prenatal testing confirmed an affected fetus, a higher percentage (32%) in the Post-PGT group disagreed to terminate the pregnancy in contrast to a much lower 6% in the pre-PGT group (**P = 0.02). Three-quarter of the couples opted to tell their child about their conception through PGT.

CONCLUSION

Chinese couples in Hong Kong had an overall good acceptability and positive attitude toward PGT. We appreciate the difficulties the couples have gone through PGT. A checklist on what to cover pre-during-post-PGT in the counseling process is needed.

Public perspectives on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

PURPOSE

To study the perspectives of the United States population towards the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in various clinical scenarios.

METHODS

Online cross-sectional population based questionnaire of a nationally representative sample according to age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, education and religion.

RESULTS

A total of 1006 completed the questionnaire with an overall response rate of 94%. A majority supported PGD for diseases fatal early in life or those causing lifelong disability (72.9 and 66.7%, respectively); only 48.0% supported PGD for diseases that manifest late in life. Respondents were more supportive of PGD for genetic diseases if they were aware of PGD prior to the survey (OR = 1.64; CI = 1.13-2.39). However, a small proportion were in favor of genetically-based trait selection: 21.1% supported PGD for sex selection, 14.6% for physical traits and 18.9% for personality traits. Compared to women, men were nearly two- to three-fold more supportive of PGD for sex selection (OR = 1.65; CI = 1.20-2.78), physical traits (OR = 2.38; CI = 1.60-3.48) and personality traits (OR = 2.31; CI =  .64-3.26). Compared to Caucasians, Asians (OR = 3.87; CI = 1.71-8.78) and African Americans (OR = 1.61; CI = 1.04-2.74) were more supportive of PGD for sex selection.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationally representative sample, a majority supported PGD to identify early onset diseases. We noted significant variation in opinions by sex, race, and education. There was more support among those with prior knowledge of PGD suggesting that education about PGD may foster favorable opinions. This study identifies public knowledge and attitudes that may be used to shape future research hypotheses and clinical policies.

High-risk consumers' perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Individuals carrying deleterious germline mutations placing them at increased risk for hereditary cancer syndromes (high-risk consumers) often have a great deal of fear and concern over transmitting mutations to their offspring, particularly conditions which are autosomal dominant. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a procedure that can detect certain germline cancer predisposing mutations present in embryos. The objective of this review was to assess high-risk consumers' knowledge and perceptions of PGD for hereditary cancers. A systematic literature review was conducted through PubMed, Wiley Interscience, PsychInfo, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all articles assessing consumer knowledge and attitudes of PGD for hereditary cancer syndromes. We assessed heterogeneity and the robustness of findings through additional analyses according to study location, hereditary cancer type, and sample size. Thirteen articles remained eligible after the application of specific criteria. Results show a general low level of knowledge about PGD for hereditary cancers, moderate rates of acceptability among high-risk groups, and high levels of need for information about PGD. Individuals in specific risk groups such as those with a personal or family history of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) may benefit from educational information from healthcare professionals about the use of PGD.

The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study

Exponential growth in genomics has led to public and private initiatives worldwide that have dramatically increased the number of procreative couples who are aware of their ability to transmit genetic disorders to their future children. Understanding how couples process the meaning of being genetically at-risk for their procreative life lags far behind the advances in genomic and reproductive sciences. Moreover, society, policy makers, and clinicians are not aware of the experiences and nuances involved when modern couples are faced with using Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). The purpose of this study was to discover the decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples as they decide whether to use PGD to prevent the transmission of known single-gene or sex-linked genetic disorders to their children. A qualitative, grounded theory design guided the study in which 22 couples (44 individual partners) from the USA, who were actively considering PGD, participated. Couples were recruited from June 2009 to May 2010 from the Internet and from a large PGD center and a patient newsletter. In-depth semi-structured interviews were completed with each individual partner within the couple dyad, separate from their respective partner. We discovered that couples move through four phases (Identify, Contemplate, Resolve, Engage) of a complex, dynamic, and iterative decision-making process where multiple, sequential decisions are made. In the Identify phase, couples acknowledge the meaning of their at-risk status. Parenthood and reproductive options are explored in the Contemplate phase, where 41% of couples remained for up to 36 months before moving into the Resolve phase. In Resolve, one of three decisions about PGD use is reached, including: Accepting, Declining, or Oscillating. Actualizing decisions occur in the Engage phase. Awareness of the decision-making process among genetically at-risk couples provides foundational work for understanding critical processes and aids in identifying important gaps for intervention and future research.

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and family planning: the attitude towards prenatal diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a hereditary disorder caused by LKB1 gene mutations, and is associated with considerable morbidity and decreased life expectancy. This study was conducted to assess the attitude of PJS patients towards family planning, prenatal diagnosis (PND) and pregnancy termination, and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). In a cross-sectional study, 61 adult PJS patients were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning genetic testing, family planning, PND and PGD. The questionnaire was completed by 52 patients (85% response rate, 44% males) with a median age of 44 (range 18-74) years. A total of 37 (71%) respondents had undergone genetic testing. In all, 24 respondents (46%, 75% males) had children. A total of 15 (29%) respondents reported that their diagnosis of PJS had influenced their decisions regarding family planning, including 10 patients (19%, 9/10 females) who did not want to have children because of their disease. Termination of pregnancy after PND in case of a foetus with PJS was considered 'acceptable' for 15% of the respondents, whereas 52% considered PGD acceptable. In conclusion, the diagnosis of PJS influences the decisions regarding family planning in one third of PJS patients, especially in women. Most patients have a negative attitude towards pregnancy termination after PND, while PGD in case of PJS is judged more acceptable. These results emphasise the importance of discussing aspects regarding family planning with PJS patients, including PND and PGD.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Saudi Arabia: parents' experience and attitudes

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis (PND). This study compares the attitudes towards PGD of four groups of parents in Saudi Arabia: two groups at genetic risk for different conditions but with no experience of PGD procedures and two groups who had experience, either of PGD or of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for infertility.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty four participants attending the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC) in Riyadh were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire: 49 had children affected by a haemoglobin disorder, 48 had children with non-syndromic deafness, 37 were attending the PGD service and 50 were attending IVF services for infertility.

RESULTS

Opinions in the two genetic groups were very similar: families were enthusiastic about PGD and relatively unconcerned about its technical limitations or the desirability of a confirmatory PND. The technical limitations of PGD and the moral status of embryos were of greatest concern to the PGD group. Waiting for the pregnancy result was the most commonly mentioned concern in the PGD and IVF groups.

CONCLUSION

PGD might be considered for a range of conditions in Saudi Arabia. However, it is not an easy option, and couples must be selected and counselled appropriately.

Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions

OBJECTIVE

To illuminate and synthesize what is known about the underlying decision making processes surrounding couples' preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) use or disuse and to formulate an initial conceptual framework that can guide future research and practice.

METHODS

This systematic review targeted empirical studies published in English from 1990 to 2008 that examined the decision making process of couples or individual partners that had used, were eligible for, or had contemplated PGD. Sixteen studies met the eligibility requirements. To provide a more comprehensive review, empirical studies that examined healthcare professionals' perceptions of couples' decision making surrounding PGD use and key publications from a variety of disciplines supplemented the analysis.

RESULTS

The conceptual framework formulated from the review demonstrates that couples' PGD decision making is composed of three iterative and dynamic dimensions: cognitive appraisals, emotional responses, and moral judgments.

CONCLUSION

Couples think critically about uncertain and probabilistic information, grapple with conflicting emotions, and incorporate moral perspectives into their decision making about whether or not to use PGD.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The quality of care and decisional support for couples who are contemplating PGD use can be improved by incorporating focused questions and discussion from each of the dimensions into counseling sessions.

PGD for all cystic fibrosis carrier couples: novel strategy for preventive medicine and cost analysis

Over 1000 children affected with cystic fibrosis (CF) are born annually in the USA. Since IVF with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is an alternative to raising a sick child or to aborting an affected fetus, a cost-benefit analysis was performed for a national IVF-PGD program for preventing CF. The amount spent to deliver healthy children for all CF carrier-couples by IVF-PGD was compared with the average annual and lifetime direct medical costs per CF patient avoided. Treating annually about 4000 CF carrier-couples with IVF-PGD would result in 3715 deliveries of non-affected children at a cost of $57,467 per baby. Because the average annual direct medical cost per CF patient was $63,127 and life expectancy is 37 years, savings would be $2.3 million per patient and $2.2 billion for all new CF patients annually in lifetime treatment costs. Cumulated net saving of an IVF-PGD program for all carrier-couples for 37 years would be $33.3 billion. A total of 618,714 cumulative years of patients suffering because of CF and thousands of abortions could be prevented. A national IVF-PGD program is a highly cost-effective novel modality of preventive medicine and would avoid most births of individuals affected with debilitating genetic disease.

Psychological impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a review of the literature

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was first reported as successful in humans in the early 1990s and nearly two decades later the psychological impact of PGD has not yet been clearly defined. As PGD requires the use of IVF, this paper provides a brief summary of literature related to the various psychological aspects of IVF followed by a review of the literature related to the psychological and broader psychosocial impact of PGD. The current literature includes attitudinal studies of couples for whom PGD may be beneficial and results suggest that those with traumatic reproductive and genetic histories are more likely to find PGD an acceptable treatment option. A small number of studies have used samples of women and couples who have used PGD. Due to a general lack of homogeneity in scope, method and results, these studies have not provided a uniform understanding of the PGD experience. Promisingly, however, two studies on parents of children born after PGD that explored parental stress show no differences between PGD, IVF and natural conception couples. The paper concludes that the missing link in the literature is a prospective study of PGD using validated psychological scales. Suggestions for future research are provided.

Acceptance of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for beta-thalassemia in Lebanese women with previously affected children

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the rate of acceptance of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis in Lebanese women with previously affected children with homozygous beta-thalassemia.

METHODS

Women with a previously affected child attending a non governmentally funded thalassemia care center between 1 June 2005 and 31 May 2007 were offered a genetic counseling session. This was followed by administering a questionnaire through direct interview.

RESULTS

All 97 women approached accepted to participate in the study (100% response rate). Sixty eight per cent of women considered PGD a better alternative to prenatal diagnosis. The most important perceived advantage of PGD was the avoidance of termination of an affected pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

PGD is an acceptable alternative to conventional prenatal diagnosis in women at risk of conceiving a child affected with beta-thalassemia. This is particularly true in countries of the Middle-East where therapeutic abortions for fetal indications are prohibited by the law and religion.

Complexities in reproductive choice: medical professionals' attitudes to and experiences of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis

Studies have been made on attitudes to and experiences of women and men who have undergone pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), or who are regarded as potential users of this diagnostic method. Few studies have been conducted regarding the attitudes to and experiences of medical professionals as regards PGD. This paper reports on findings from such a qualitative study in which 18 semi-structured interviews were performed with geneticists and gynaecologists in Italy, Sweden and the UK. Interviewees emphasized, among other things, the importance of choice provision. Interviewees also told stories that indicated the many ways through which choice was feared to be hampered - or was hampered. A similar emphasis on the importance of PGD as one more alternative to choose between, for 'high-risk' couples, is not found in studies on the experiences, attitudes and views of potential, or actual, users of PGD.

Preimplantation genetic screening as an alternative to prenatal testing for Down syndrome: preferences of women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment

OBJECTIVE

Although the primary goal of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is to increase pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, it has been suggested that it may also be used as an alternative to prenatal testing for Down syndrome.

DESIGN

Trade-off questionnaires.

SETTING

Two university centers for reproductive medicine.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred forty-four subfertile women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Scenarios with different pregnancy chances after PGS and with different risk reductions of a Down syndrome pregnancy were presented.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Willingness to have PGS performed in the various scenarios.

RESULT(S)

In case PGS would discover all Down syndrome embryos without affecting pregnancy chances, 83% of the women would have PGS performed. If PGS lowered pregnancy chances from one in five to one in seven, 36% of the women preferred to have PGS performed. If PGS reduced the chance of a Down syndrome pregnancy with 80% without affecting pregnancy chances, 75% of the women would have PGS performed, and 31% of them would refrain from prenatal testing afterward.

CONCLUSION(S)

Most women favor PGS for Down syndrome screening, even if it is not 100% sensitive. The acceptability depends on the effect PGS has on pregnancy chances, and, to a lower extent on its sensitivity to detect Down syndrome embryos.

Attitudes to prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis in Saudi parents at genetic risk

BACKGROUND

Prenatal diagnosis (PND) is only available for severe abnormality in Saudi Arabia, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed as a valuable alternative. The acceptability of PGD is unexplored, and may ultimately determine the value of this technology in Saudi Arabia. This study reports attitudes towards PND and PGD of Saudi couples offered genetic counselling following the birth of a child with a single gene or chromosomal condition.

METHODS

Thirty couples attending the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. One couple had previous experience of PND and none had experience of PGD or IVF.

RESULTS

Eight of the 30 couples (27%) would only accept PGD; four (13%) only PND; three (10%) either technology; the remainder would accept neither test, or were unsure. The main concerns of those who would accept neither technology were related to personal religious views. Specific concerns about PGD related to the IVF procedure, the risk of multiple pregnancies, the chance of mistakes and the chance of not getting pregnant. A high proportion of couples (six out of seven; 86%) who had a child with thalassaemia expressed interest in PGD, and all would be prepared to use technology to avoid having an affected child. Views were more mixed for the other conditions.

CONCLUSION

PGD is acceptable to many couples and for some, it represents a valuable alternative to PND. However, parents' concerns are complex, and the acceptability of different reproductive technologies must be established on an individual basis.

How and why parents change their attitudes to prenatal diagnosis

Parents who know they are carriers of a genetically transmitted disease because they gave birth to an affected child are being offered a number of reproductive options in a subsequent pregnancy. We describe the attitudes and motives of parents of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) who were initially determined to use prenatal testing but eventually refused it. Based on our observations and clinical impressions we built a model of change that entails a series of stages and depicts change as a process. This begins with the provision of comprehensive information and emotional support through health professionals (Stage 1). The parents then engage in intense confrontation with the impact of prenatal testing and are exposed to influences from many sides. The repeated comparing of the arguments results in uncertainty and distress (Stage 2). When pregnancy occurs a decision must be made and the process culminates in participating in a life-or-death decision. If the parents cannot cope with that responsibility then a change towards rejection of prenatal diagnosis is likely (Stage 3). This phenomenon seems to be the most decisive factor. A case vignette is used to illustrate this model which may be applicable to many individuals who face major and emotionally fraught decisions.

PGD patients' and providers' attitudes to the use and regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) providers and patients have a vested interest in policy related to the use and regulation of PGD. To understand their experiences and attitudes, 32 in-depth interviews were conducted. Participants included 13 people at risk of transmitting a single-gene alteration to their children (10/13 had actually used PGD to try to have an unaffected child) and 19 PGD service providers (four nurses, five genetic counsellors, two reproductive endocrinologists, two geneticists, two physician-geneticists, two embryologists, and two laboratory directors). Virtually all participants supported the use of PGD to avoid severe, life-threatening genetic illness or to select embryos that are a tissue match for a sick sibling, but their attitudes varied significantly over the appropriateness of using PGD to avoid adult-onset genetic disease, to select for sex, or to select for other non-medical characteristics. There was disagreement within the PGD provider community about whether or not PGD is experimental. Participants were more concerned about overzealous government regulation of PGD creating barriers to access than potential abuses of the technology, and expected the PGD provider community to take the lead in ensuring that PGD is used for ethically appropriate purposes.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for β-thalassaemia: the Sardinian experience

OBJECTIVES

To report the experiences on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in couples at risk for beta-thalassaemia in Sardinia.

METHODS

23 couples at risk for beta-thalassaemia were included in the PGD programme with a total of 42 cycles performed. Among these, 11 couples were fertile, while the remaining 12 had associated fertility problems. In vitro Fertilization (IVF), PGD and prenatal genetic molecular confirmation protocols and results are reported.

RESULTS

All the patients followed the protocol of ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), embryo biopsy and genetic analysis. A total of 272 oocytes were fertilized in the regular way, and embryo biopsy was performed on 202 embryos. Out of these 202 embryos, 192 (95%) were successful. The genetic diagnosis was performed on 150 embryos (78.1%). Ninety-eight were identified as unaffected and 75 were transferred in 31 cycles. In the infertile patient group, two biochemical pregnancies (11.1% per transfer), in the fertile patient group, four clinical pregnancies, two twin and two singleton pregnancies (30.8% per transfer), were obtained. The genetic molecular results were confirmed in all pregnancies by first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (CVS).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that PGD for beta-thalassaemia is an available procedure for couples who wish to avoid termination of pregnancy, except in cases where the IVF cycle efficiency is very poor.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: new reproductive options for carriers of haemophilia

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for haemophilia offers couples at risk for transmitting the condition the opportunity to embark on a pregnancy knowing that the embryo is unaffected by the disease. The technique aims to increase the range of reproductive options available to these couples and remove the need for invasive prenatal diagnosis and the difficult decision on whether to terminate an affected pregnancy. This aims to reduce the anxiety associated with reproduction often seen in these couples. Patients undergo a cycle of in vitro fertilization followed by embryo biopsy. The single blastomeres are then analysed using fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect the sex of the embryo, and only female embryos are transferred to the uterus. Recently a PCR based approach has allowed specific mutation detection, and therefore the transfer of unaffected male and female embryos.

Patients' opinions regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a Latin American fertility clinic

Patients' opinions concerning the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis were evaluated in a fertility clinic with a specially designed questionnaire. The results of this study suggest that for couples with fertility problems, an embryo with severe genetic abnormalities has a different moral status than a healthy one.

Issues and concerns of couples presenting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)

BACKGROUND

The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select genetically 'normal' human embryos and to transfer them to the uterus of a woman has generated considerable controversy. Debate has occurred over the implications of PGD, sex selection, safety of embryonic manipulation and eugenics. This study evaluates a range of social and moral concerns of couples towards PGD and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) prior to treatment to obtain unbiased authentic attitudes independent of the treatment cycle and the outcome.

METHODS

A total of 121 subjects were administered a structured questionnaire after each couple's in vitro fertilization (IVF) or genetic counselling session. Group A consisted of 41 subjects presenting for PGD of single gene disorders (PGD-SG) and group B consisted of 48 subjects undertaking PGD for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS). A control group consisted of 32 subjects that were about to commence their first IVF cycle.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All groups found PGD to be a highly acceptable treatment. They expressed little concern about its extension to testing non-disease states such as sex and they were strongly in favour of a shared decision-making model in which couples have considerable autonomy over decisions about the embryo(s) to transfer. Differences between the groups included issues surrounding the transfer of embryos, restrictions to PGD and the destruction of embryos.

Attitude of at-risk subjects towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis of alpha- and beta-thalassaemias in Hong Kong

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was an acceptable alternative to prenatal diagnosis in couples at risk of giving birth to a child with alpha- or beta-thalassaemia in an Asian population.

METHODS

An information leaflet was distributed to the women at risk. They were asked to complete a questionnaire after having an interview with a designated investigator.

RESULTS

A total of 141 valid questionnaires were analysed; 82.3% of the women considered PGD either the same or better than conventional prenatal diagnosis. Women with an affected child or a subfertility problem were more willing to accept PGD and to undergo this procedure in their future pregnancies. Their main concern about PGD was damage to the embryo during the PGD procedure. The most important perceived advantage of PGD was avoidance of termination of an affected pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

PGD is an acceptable alternative to conventional prenatal diagnosis in women at risk of giving birth to a child with alpha- or beta-thalassaemia in an Asian population. This is particularly true in women with a subfertility problem and in women who already have an affected child.

Birth of healthy children after preimplantation diagnosis of thalassemias

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows couples at risk of having children with thalassemia to ensure the healthy outcome of their pregnancy.

METHODS

Seventeen PGD clinical cycles were initiated for Cypriot couples at risk of having children with different thalassemia mutations, including IVSI-110, IVSI-6, and IVS II-745. Unaffected embryos for transfer were selected by testing oocytes, using first and second polar body (PB) removal and nested polymerase chain reaction analysis followed by restriction digestion.

RESULTS

Unaffected embryos were selected in 16 of 17 PGD cycles. Of 166 oocytes studied from these cycles, 110 were analyzed by sequential analysis of both the first and the second PB, resulting in preselection and transfer of 45 unaffected embryos. This resulted in seven pregnancies and in the birth of five healthy thalassemia-free children. The embryos predicted to have inherited the affected allele were not transferred. Analysis of these embryos confirmed the PB diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential first and second PB testing of oocytes is reliable for PGD of thalassemia and is a feasible alternative to prenatal diagnosis in high-risk populations.