The clinical benefits of recombinant gonadotrophins

Ovulation induction in the new millennium: recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin

The renewed interest in luteinizing hormone (LH), together with limited and decreasing health resources, make essential the comparison of high-cost, recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) preparations (devoid of LH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in terms of clinical efficacy. All published, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rFSH versus hMG under different protocols of stimulation were examined. Eight true RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, recruiting 2031 participants. Data for ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were extracted, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with the use of a fixed-effects model. Data for the meta-analysis were combined using RevMan software (using the Mantel-Haenszel method). Pooling the results of these RCTs showed no significant difference between rFSH and hMG regarding the different outcomes: ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.93-1.50); clinical pregnancy rate, OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.99-1.47), miscarriage rate, OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.70-2.16); multiple pregnancy rate, OR 1.35 (95% CI 0.96-1.90); incidence of moderate/severe OHSS, OR 1.79 (95% CI 0.74-4.33). However, there was significant reduction in the amount of gonadotropins in favor of hMG over rFSH. There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect across the trials. In conclusion, there is no clinically significant difference between hMG and rFSH in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Decision-makers should establish their choice of one drug over the other based on the most up-to-date evidence available.

LH improves early follicular recruitment in women over 38 years old

Although the capacity of recombinant FSH alone to induce folliculogenesis is undisputed, many believe that follicular recruitment in women over 38 years old could be improved by supplementing rFSH with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). The present study sought to determine whether recombinant LH could reproduce the effect of HMG in women over 38 years during ovulation induction. Fifty-eight patients received rFSH (225 IU/day) supplemented with one ampoule of HMG (75 IU of FSH/75 IU of LH/HCG per day) for 5 days. Another 36 patients received rFSH (300 IU/day) supplemented with one ampoule of rLH (75 IU/day), also for 5 days. Both groups of patients received similar amounts of rFSH (1500 IU), LH/HCG (375 IU) and rLH (375 IU) and recruited a similar number of follicles as counted on day 6 (4.07 +/- 3.1 in the HMG group versus 3.7 +/- 3.2 in the LH group respectively) or on the day that human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was indicated (6.5 +/- 2.7 versus 5.8 +/- 2.5 respectively). Ovarian stimulation was shorter, but not significantly so, in the group of patients receiving rFSH + HMG (10.5 +/- 1.7 days) than in the group of patients treated with rFSH +/- rLH (12 +/- 1.8 days). Significantly more MII oocytes were seen in the group treated with rFSH + rLH than in the group treated with rFSH + HMG (93.1 versus 75.3%, P < 0.05). With respect to pregnancy rates, 14/54 (26%) patients receiving rFSH + HMG and 16/34 (47%) patients receiving rFSH + rLH had a positive serum HCG. No significant difference in the number of miscarriages was observed between the two groups. In conclusion, the present results seem to indicate that rLH could be the HMG component that aids early follicular recruitment.