Accumulation of Multiple Mutations In Vivo Confers Cross-Resistance to New and Existing Integrase Inhibitors

Synergistic antiviral activity against drug-resistant HIV-1 by naturally occurring dipeptide and A single-stranded oligonucleotide

The novel dipeptide WG-am and single-stranded oligonucleotide combination (WG-am:ssON) showed synergistic antiviral activity against HIV-1 integrase-, protease- or reverse transcriptase drug resistant isolates, with over 95% reduction. The highest selectivity indexes were for integrase resistant isolates. WG-am:ssON can be a future option for treatment of HIV drug-resistant strains.

Genotypic correlates of resistance to the HIV-1 strand transfer integrase inhibitor cabotegravir

Cabotegravir (CAB) is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) formulated as a long-acting injectable drug approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis and use with a long acting rilpivirine formulation for therapy in patients with virological suppression. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the genetic mechanisms of CAB resistance. Studies reporting the selection of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) by CAB and the results of in vitro CAB susceptibility testing were reviewed. The impact of integrase mutations on CAB susceptibility was assessed using regularized regression analysis. The most commonly selected mutations in the 24 persons developing virological failure while receiving CAB included Q148R (n = 15), N155H (n = 7), and E138K (n = 5). T97A, G118R, G140 A/R/S, and R263K each developed in 1-2 persons. With the exception of T97A, G118R, and G140 A/R, these DRMs were also selected in vitro while G140R was selected in the SIV macaque model. Although these DRMs are similar to those occurring in persons receiving the related INSTI dolutegravir, Q148R was more likely to occur with CAB while G118R and R263K were more likely to occur with dolutegravir. Regularized regression analysis identified 14 DRMs significantly associated with reduced CAB susceptibility including six primary DRMs which reduced susceptibility on their own including G118R, Q148 H/K/R, N155H, and R263K, and eight accessory DRMs including M50I, L74 F/M, T97A, E138K, and G140 A/C/S. Isolates with Q148 H/K/R in combination with L74M, E138 A/K, G140 A/S, and N155H often had >10-fold reduced CAB susceptibility. M50I, L74M, and T97A are polymorphic mutations that alone did not appear to increase the risk of virological failure in persons receiving a CAB-containing regimen. Careful patient screening is required to prevent CAB from being used during active virus replication. Close virological monitoring is required to minimize CAB exposure to active replication to prevent the emergence of DRMs associated with cross-resistance to other INSTIs.

Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention: What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Risks and Consequences of Cabotegravir Resistance?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cabotegravir is a potent integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) recently approved as a long-acting injectable formulation for HIV prevention (CAB-LA). We summarize what is known about cabotegravir pharmacokinetics, activity, and emergence of resistance from in vitro, macaque and clinical studies, and we evaluate the risk of resistance from CAB-LA with on-time injections and after CAB-LA discontinuation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The accumulation of multiple INSTI mutations is required for high-level cabotegravir resistance, and the same mutation combinations may cause cross-resistance to dolutegravir, which is widely used for first-line antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Though CAB-LA was highly effective in preventing HIV, breakthrough infections did occur in trials of CAB-LA despite on-time injections, resulting in selection of single and combinations of INSTI resistance mutations. As CAB-LA is scaled-up, prompt HIV diagnosis to prevent resistance, and resistance monitoring could help preserve the effectiveness of INSTIs for both HIV treatment and prevention.

Effectiveness of integrase strand transfer inhibitors in HIV-infected treatment-experienced individuals across Europe

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effectiveness and durability of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens in pre-treated subjects.

METHODS

Treatment-experienced individuals starting an INSTI-based regimen during 2012-2019 were selected from the INTEGRATE collaborative study. The time to virological failure [VF: one measurement of viral load (VL) ≥ 1000 copies/mL or two ≥ 50 copies/ml or one VL measurement ≥ 50 copies/mL followed by treatment change] and to INSTI discontinuation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 13 560 treatments analysed, 4284 were from INSTI-naïve, non-viraemic (IN-NV) individuals, 1465 were from INSTI-naïve, viraemic (IN-V) individuals, 6016 were from INSTI-experienced, non-viraemic (IE-NV) individuals and 1795 were from INSTI-experienced, viraemic (IE-V) individuals. Major INSTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were previously detected in 4/519 (0.8%) IN-NV, 3/394 (0.8%) IN-V, 7/1510 (0.5%) IE-NV and 25/935 (2.7%) IE-V individuals. The 1-year estimated probabilities of VF were 3.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-3.8] in IN-NV, 18.4% (95% CI: 15.8-21.2) in IN-V, 4.2% (95% CI: 3.6-4.9) in IE-NV and 23.9% (95% CI: 20.9-26.9) in IE-V subjects. The 1-year estimated probabilities of INSTI discontinuation were 12.1% (95% CI: 11.1-13.0) in IN-NV, 19.6% (95% CI: 17.5-21.6) in IN-V, 10.8% (95% CI: 10.0-11.6) in IE-NV and 21.7% (95% CI: 19.7-23.5) in IE-V subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VF and INSTI discontinuation occur at substantial rates in viraemic subjects. Detection of DRMs in a proportion of INSTI-experienced individuals makes INSTI resistance testing mandatory after failure.

Structure and function of retroviral integrase

A hallmark of retroviral replication is establishment of the proviral state, wherein a DNA copy of the viral RNA genome is stably incorporated into a host cell chromosome. Integrase is the viral enzyme responsible for the catalytic steps involved in this process, and integrase strand transfer inhibitors are widely used to treat people living with HIV. Over the past decade, a series of X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy studies have revealed the structural basis of retroviral DNA integration. A variable number of integrase molecules congregate on viral DNA ends to assemble a conserved intasome core machine that facilitates integration. The structures additionally informed on the modes of integrase inhibitor action and the means by which HIV acquires drug resistance. Recent years have witnessed the development of allosteric integrase inhibitors, a highly promising class of small molecules that antagonize viral morphogenesis. In this Review, we explore recent insights into the organization and mechanism of the retroviral integration machinery and highlight open questions as well as new directions in the field.

High-level resistance to bictegravir and cabotegravir in subtype A- and D-infected HIV-1 patients failing raltegravir with multiple resistance mutations

OBJECTIVES

The second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) bictegravir is becoming accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and another INSTI, cabotegravir, has recently been approved as a long-acting injectable. Data on bictegravir and cabotegravir susceptibility in raltegravir-experienced HIV-1 subtype A- and D-infected patients carrying drug resistance mutations (DRMs) remain very scarce in LMICs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HIV-1 integrase (IN)-recombinant viruses from eight patients failing raltegravir-based third-line therapy in Uganda were genotypically and phenotypically tested for susceptibility to bictegravir and cabotegravir. Ability of these viruses to integrate into human genomes was assessed in MT-4 cells.

RESULTS

HIV-1 IN-recombinant viruses harbouring single primary mutations (N155H or Y143R/S) or in combination with secondary INSTI mutations (T97A, M50I, L74IM, E157Q, G163R or V151I) were susceptible to both bictegravir and cabotegravir. However, combinations of primary INSTI-resistance mutations such as E138A/G140A/G163R/Q148R or E138K/G140A/S147G/Q148K led to decreased susceptibility to both cabotegravir (fold change in EC50 values from 429 to 1000×) and bictegravir (60 to 100×), exhibiting a high degree of cross-resistance. However, these same IN-recombinant viruses showed impaired integration capacity (14% to 48%) relative to the WT HIV-1 NL4-3 strain in the absence of drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Though not currently widely accessible in most LMICs, bictegravir and cabotegravir offer a valid alternative to HIV-infected individuals harbouring subtype A and D HIV-1 variants with reduced susceptibility to first-generation INSTIs but previous exposure to raltegravir may reduce efficacy, more so with cabotegravir.

Accumulation of integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mutations confers high-level resistance to dolutegravir in non-B subtype HIV-1 strains from patients failing raltegravir in Uganda

BACKGROUND

Increasing first-line treatment failures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have led to increased use of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) such as dolutegravir. However, HIV-1 susceptibility to INSTIs in LMICs, especially with previous raltegravir exposure, is poorly understood due to infrequent reporting of INSTI failures and testing for INSTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs).

METHODS

A total of 51 non-subtype B HIV-1 infected patients failing third-line (raltegravir-based) therapy in Uganda were initially selected for the study. DRMs were detected using Sanger and deep sequencing. HIV integrase genes of 13 patients were cloned and replication capacities (RCs) and phenotypic susceptibilities to dolutegravir, raltegravir and elvitegravir were determined with TZM-bl cells. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine cross-resistance between INSTIs.

RESULTS

INSTI DRMs were detected in 47% of patients. HIV integrase-recombinant virus carrying one primary INSTI DRM (N155H or Y143R/S) was susceptible to dolutegravir but highly resistant to raltegravir and elvitegravir (>50-fold change). Two patients, one with E138A/G140A/Q148R/G163R and one with E138K/G140A/S147G/Q148K, displayed the highest reported resistance to raltegravir, elvitegravir and even dolutegravir. The former multi-DRM virus had WT RC whereas the latter had lower RCs than WT.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-1 subtype A- and D-infected patients failing raltegravir and harbouring INSTI DRMs, there is high-level resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir. More routine monitoring of INSTI treatment may be advised in LMICs, considering that multiple INSTI DRMs may have accumulated during prolonged exposure to raltegravir during virological failure, leading to high-level INSTI resistance, including dolutegravir resistance.

The potential role of long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine in the treatment of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of a combination of the integrase inhibitor, cabotegravir, and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, rilpivirine, in a long-acting injectable form is being considered as an antiretroviral treatment option for people with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to model the effects of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine to help to inform its potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness under different possible policies for its introduction.

METHODS

We used an existing individual-based model of HIV to predict the effects of introducing monthly injections of cabotegravir-rilpivirine for people with HIV in low-income settings in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated policies in the context of 1000 setting scenarios that reflected characteristics of HIV epidemics and programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. We compared three policies for introduction of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine with continued use of dolutegravir-based oral regimens for: all individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART); individuals with a recently measured viral load of more than 1000 copies per mL (signifying poor adherence to oral drugs, and often associated with drug resistance); and individuals with a recently measured viral load of less than 1000 copies per mL (a group with a lower prevalence of pre-existing drug resistance). We also did cost-effectiveness analysis, taking a health system perspective over a 10 year period, with 3% discounting of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and costs. A cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per DALY averted was used to establish if a policy was cost-effective.

FINDINGS

In our model, all policies involving the introduction of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine were predicted to lead to an increased proportion of people with HIV on ART, increased viral load suppression, and decreased AIDS-related mortality, with lesser benefits in people with a recently measured viral load of less than 1000 copies per mL. Its introduction is also predicted to lead to increases in resistance to integrase inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors if introduced in all people with HIV on ART or in those with a recently measured viral load of less than 1000 copies per mL, but to a lesser extent if introduced in people with more than 1000 copies per mL due to concentration of its use in people less adherent to oral therapy. Consistent with the effect on AIDS-related mortality, all approaches to the introduction of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine are predicted to avert DALYs. Assuming a cost of $120 per person per year, use of this regimen in people with a recently measured viral load of more than 1000 copies per mL was borderline cost-effective (median cost per DALY averted across setting scenarios $404). The other approaches considered for its use are unlikely to be cost-effective unless the cost per year of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine is considerably reduced.

INTERPRETATION

Our modelling suggests that injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine offers potential benefits; however, to be a cost-effective option, its introduction might need to be carefully targeted to individuals with HIV who might otherwise have suboptimal adherence to ART. As data accumulate from trials and implementation studies, such findings can be incorporated into the model to better inform on the full consequences of policy alternatives.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, including through the HIV Modelling Consortium (OPP1191655).

HIV Drug Resistance in Children and Adolescents: Always a Challenge?

Purpose of Review

With the expanded roll-out of antiretrovirals for treatment and prevention of HIV during the last decade, the emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) has become a growing challenge. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology and trajectory of HIVDR globally with an emphasis on pediatric and adolescent populations.

Recent Findings

HIVDR is associated with suboptimal virologic suppression and treatment failure, leading to an increased risk of HIV transmission to uninfected people and increased morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV. High rates of HIVDR to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors globally are expected to decline with the introduction of the integrase strand transfer inhibitors and long-acting combination regimens, while challenge remains for HIVDR to other classes of antiretroviral drugs.

Summary

We highlight several solutions including increased HIV viral load monitoring, expanded HIVDR surveillance, and adopting antiretroviral regimens with a high-resistance barrier to decrease HIVDR. Implementation studies and programmatic changes are needed to determine the best approach to prevent and combat the development of HIVDR.

HIV-1 resistance patterns to integrase inhibitors in Chilean patients with virological failure on raltegravir-containing regimens

In this viewpoint we would like to describe our results in terms of resistance pattern in Chilean patients with virological failure (VF) on raltegravir (RAL)-containing-regimens and highlight the need for the concomitant availability of genotypic resistance testing to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) introduction in antiretroviral regimens, particularly in countries in South America. Indeed we found in our study the presence of two or more primary mutations in some of the participants which is associated with cross-resistance to all INSTIs. By using timely genotyping, we could optimally manage these patients, early after detection of VF.

A systematic review of the genetic mechanisms of dolutegravir resistance

Background

Characterizing the mutations selected by the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir and their effects on susceptibility is essential for identifying viruses less likely to respond to dolutegravir therapy and for monitoring persons with virological failure (VF) on dolutegravir therapy.

Methods

We systematically reviewed dolutegravir resistance studies to identify mutations emerging under dolutegravir selection pressure, the effect of INSTI resistance mutations on in vitro dolutegravir susceptibility, and the virological efficacy of dolutegravir in antiretroviral-experienced persons.

Results and conclusions

We analysed 14 studies describing 84 in vitro passage experiments, 26 studies describing 63 persons developing VF plus INSTI resistance mutations on a dolutegravir-containing regimen, 41 studies describing dolutegravir susceptibility results, and 22 clinical trials and 16 cohort studies of dolutegravir-containing regimens. The most common INSTI resistance mutations in persons with VF on a dolutegravir-containing regimen were R263K, G118R, N155H and Q148H/R, with R263K and G118R predominating in previously INSTI-naive persons. R263K reduced dolutegravir susceptibility ∼2-fold. G118R generally reduced dolutegravir susceptibility >5-fold. The highest levels of reduced susceptibility occurred in viruses containing Q148 mutations in combination with G140 and/or E138 mutations. Dolutegravir two-drug regimens were highly effective for first-line therapy and for virologically suppressed persons provided dolutegravir’s companion drug was fully active. Dolutegravir three-drug regimens were highly effective for salvage therapy in INSTI-naive persons provided one or more of dolutegravir’s companion drugs was fully active. However, dolutegravir monotherapy in virologically suppressed persons and functional dolutegravir monotherapy in persons with active viral replication were associated with a non-trivial risk of VF plus INSTI resistance mutations.

Going beyond Integration: The Emerging Role of HIV-1 Integrase in Virion Morphogenesis

The HIV-1 integrase enzyme (IN) plays a critical role in the viral life cycle by integrating the reverse-transcribed viral DNA into the host chromosome. This function of IN has been well studied, and the knowledge gained has informed the design of small molecule inhibitors that now form key components of antiretroviral therapy regimens. Recent discoveries unveiled that IN has an under-studied yet equally vital second function in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication. This involves IN binding to the viral RNA genome in virions, which is necessary for proper virion maturation and morphogenesis. Inhibition of IN binding to the viral RNA genome results in mislocalization of the viral genome inside the virus particle, and its premature exposure and degradation in target cells. The roles of IN in integration and virion morphogenesis share a number of common elements, including interaction with viral nucleic acids and assembly of higher-order IN multimers. Herein we describe these two functions of IN within the context of the HIV-1 life cycle, how IN binding to the viral genome is coordinated by the major structural protein, Gag, and discuss the value of targeting the second role of IN in virion morphogenesis.

Close-up: HIV/SIV intasome structures shed new light on integrase inhibitor binding and viral escape mechanisms

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are important components of drug formulations that are used to treat people living with HIV, and second-generation INSTIs dolutegravir and bictegravir impart high barriers to the development of drug resistance. Reported 10 years ago, X-ray crystal structures of prototype foamy virus (PFV) intasome complexes explained how INSTIs bind integrase to inhibit strand transfer activity and provided initial glimpses into mechanisms of drug resistance. However, comparatively low sequence identity between PFV and HIV-1 integrases limited the depth of information that could be gleaned from the surrogate model system. Recent high-resolution structures of HIV-1 intasomes as well as intasomes from a closely related strain of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), which were determined using single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy, have overcome this limitation. The new structures reveal the binding modes of several advanced INSTI compounds to the HIV/SIV integrase active site and critically inform the structural basis of drug resistance. These findings will help guide the continued development of this important class of antiretroviral therapeutics.

Susceptibility to HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in highly treatment-experienced patients who failed an INSTI-based regimen

The aim of this study was to characterize the genotypic and phenotypic resistance profile to the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) bictegravir (BIC) and other INSTIs in patients who previously failed twice-daily raltegravir (RAL)-based or twice-daily dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens. Twenty-two samples were collected after failure on an INSTI-based regimen in 17 highly treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 with multi-drug-resistant virus, recorded in the Italian PRESTIGIO registry. Genotypic resistance mutations and phenotypic susceptibility to INSTIs were detected by GeneSeqIN and PhenoSenseIN assays, respectively (Monogram Biosciences, San Francisco, CA, USA). The primary INSTI resistance substitutions E138A/K, G140S, Y143C/H/R, Q148H and N155H were detected in 14 of 22 samples and were associated with resistance to one or more INSTIs, with G140S+Q148H present in 11 of 22 samples. Of these 14 samples, all showed high levels of resistance to elvitegravir (EVG) and RAL. Two isolates contained L74M, E138K, G140S and Q148H, or L74M, T97A, S119T, E138K, G140S, Y143R and Q148H, and had high-level resistance to all INSTIs, including BIC and DTG. Intermediate resistance was reported for eight of 14 isolates for BIC and nine of 14 isolates for DTG. Overall, for the 14 INSTI-resistant isolates, the median fold-change values in phenotypic susceptibility were: BIC 3.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.6-66], DTG 6.3 (IQR 0.8->186), EVG >164 (IQR 2.6->164) and RAL >188 (IQR 2.7->197). In conclusion, the study findings supported the in-vitro activity of BIC and DTG against most isolates derived from highly treatment-experienced patients who failed INSTI regimens.

Presence of V72I, G123S and R127K Integrase Inhibitor polymorphisms could reduce ART effectiveness: a retrospective longitudinal study

Objectives: Structural aspects of HIV-1 integrase complex and role of integrase minor mutations and polymorphisms in ART effectiveness is still unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the 24 and 48 weeks (W) effectiveness of ART regimens in patients with Integrase Inhibitors (InSTI) minor mutations and polymorphisms receiving InSTI-based regimens.Methods: We enrolled all ART-naïve or InSTI-naïve HIV-infected patients, with a baseline InSTI genotypic resistances test between 2011 and 2016. We analyzed integrase resistance mutations using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database (HIVdb Program, version 6.3.0). The outcome was virological response at 24 and 48 W of follow up (FU) according to snapshot analysis. We defined virological failure as two consecutive HIV-RNA > 50 copies/ml, or one >1000 copies/ml. Patients were divided in those presenting InSTI minor mutations (Group 1), and those with only polymorphisms or wild type (Group 2).Results: We enrolled 83 patients. 81 patients reached 24 W of FU: 2/20 (10%) and 4/61 (6.5%) showed virological failure in Group 1 and 2 respectively. 66 patients reached 48 W of FU: 0/17 (0%) and 2/49 (4%) showed virological failure in Group 1 and 2 respectively. Interestingly, patients with polymorphisms G123S and R127K had higher risk of failure at 24 W (respectively, relative risk - RR - 36, IQR 2.1-613, p = 0.01; RR 36, IQR 2.1-613, p = 0.01) and patients with V72I had an higher risk of failure both at 24 W (RR 6.52, IQR 1.29-32.9, p = 0.02) and 48 W (RR 21.1, IQR 1.07-414, p = 0.04).Conclusions: Our study showed that the presence of V72I, G123S and R127K polymorphisms could play a role in reducing InSTI effectiveness.

Structural basis of second-generation HIV integrase inhibitor action and viral resistance

Although second-generation HIV integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are prescribed throughout the world, the mechanistic basis for the superiority of these drugs is poorly understood. We used single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to visualize the mode of action of the advanced INSTIs dolutegravir and bictegravir at near-atomic resolution. Glutamine-148→histidine (Q148H) and glycine-140→serine (G140S) amino acid substitutions in integrase that result in clinical INSTI failure perturb optimal magnesium ion coordination in the enzyme active site. The expanded chemical scaffolds of second-generation compounds mediate interactions with the protein backbone that are critical for antagonizing viruses containing the Q148H and G140S mutations. Our results reveal that binding to magnesium ions underpins a fundamental weakness of the INSTI pharmacophore that is exploited by the virus to engender resistance and provide a structural framework for the development of this class of anti-HIV/AIDS therapeutics.

Comparable In Vitro Activities of Second-Generation HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) on HIV-1 Clinical Isolates with INSTI Resistance Mutations

Second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) dolutegravir (DTG), bictegravir (BIC), and cabotegravir (CAB) showed a high genetic barrier to resistance and limited cross-resistance with first-generation INSTIs raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG). In this study, DTG, BIC, and CAB demonstrated a comparable activity on a panel of INSTI-resistant strains isolated from patients exposed to RAL, EVG, and/or DTG, with a significantly reduced susceptibility only with the pathway Q148H/K/R plus one to two additional INSTI mutations.

Multifaceted HIV integrase functionalities and therapeutic strategies for their inhibition

Antiretroviral inhibitors that are used to manage HIV infection/AIDS predominantly target three enzymes required for virus replication: reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase. Although integrase inhibitors were the last among this group to be approved for treating people living with HIV, they have since risen to the forefront of treatment options. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are now recommended components of frontline and drug-switch antiretroviral therapy formulations. Integrase catalyzes two successive magnesium-dependent polynucleotidyl transferase reactions, 3' processing and strand transfer, and INSTIs tightly bind the divalent metal ions and viral DNA end after 3' processing, displacing from the integrase active site the DNA 3'-hydroxyl group that is required for strand transfer activity. Although second-generation INSTIs present higher barriers to the development of viral drug resistance than first-generation compounds, the mechanisms underlying these superior barrier profiles are incompletely understood. A separate class of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors, the allosteric integrase inhibitors (ALLINIs), engage integrase distal from the enzyme active site, namely at the binding site for the cellular cofactor lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75 that helps to guide integration into host genes. ALLINIs inhibit HIV-1 replication by inducing integrase hypermultimerization, which precludes integrase binding to genomic RNA and perturbs the morphogenesis of new viral particles. Although not yet approved for human use, ALLINIs provide important probes that can be used to investigate the link between HIV-1 integrase and viral particle morphogenesis. Herein, I review the mechanisms of retroviral integration as well as the promises and challenges of using integrase inhibitors for HIV/AIDS management.

Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide: A Review in HIV-1 Infection

Bictegravir is a new integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) with a high genetic barrier to the development of HIV-1 resistance. The drug is co-formulated with the nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (AF) in a single-tablet regimen (STR) for the once-daily treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF; Biktarvy^®). In phase 3 trials, bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF was noninferior to dolutegravir-based therapy (dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine or dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir AF) in establishing virological suppression in treatment-naïve adults through 96 weeks’ treatment and, similarly, was noninferior to ongoing dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine or boosted elvitegravir- or protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy in preventing virological rebound over 48 weeks in treatment-experienced patients. No resistance emerged to any of the antiretrovirals in the STR. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF is generally well tolerated, requires no prior HLA-B*5701 testing (making it more suitable for ‘rapid start’ treatment), fulfils the antiretroviral regimen requirement for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection (i.e. contains tenofovir AF and emtricitabine, both of which are active against HBV) and can be used in renally impaired patients with creatinine clearance (CR_CL) ≥ 30 mL/min. Thus, although cost-effectiveness analyses would be beneficial, current data indicate that bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF is a convenient initial and subsequent treatment option for adults with HIV-1 infection, including those co-infected with HBV, and provides the first non-pharmacologically boosted, INSTI-based, triple-combination STR suitable for patients with CR_CL 30–50 mL/min.

Comparison of the Antiviral Activity of Bictegravir against HIV-1 and HIV-2 Isolates and Integrase Inhibitor-Resistant HIV-2 Mutants

We compared the activity of the integrase inhibitor bictegravir against HIV-1 and HIV-2 using a culture-based, single-cycle assay. Values of 50% effective concentrations ranged from 1.2 to 2.5 nM for 9 HIV-1 isolates and 1.4 to 5.6 nM for 15 HIV-2 isolates. HIV-2 integrase mutants G140S/Q148R and G140S/Q148H were 34- and 110-fold resistant to bictegravir, respectively; other resistance-associated mutations conferred ≤5-fold changes in bictegravir susceptibility. Our findings indicate that bictegravir-based antiretroviral therapy should be evaluated in HIV-2-infected individuals.

Curbing the rise of HIV drug resistance in low-income and middle-income countries: the role of dolutegravir-containing regimens

To improve virological suppression and address the emerging threat of HIV drug resistance, many low-income and middle-income countries are moving away from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) and transitioning to dolutegravir as part of a more affordable and standardised antiretroviral therapy (ART). Although this transition could decrease the effect of rising NNRTI resistance and yield improved ART outcomes, it also presents new challenges. First, current safety concerns for dolutegravir use in women of childbearing potential require alternative solutions. Second, pre-existing resistance to the co-administered nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors might reduce effectiveness and durability of dolutegravir, particularly if there is scarce access to viral load tests to monitor treatment outcomes. Third, there is inadequate information on the genetic correlates of resistance to dolutegravir, particularly in patients infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes. Finally, clinical management of patients with confirmed virological failure on a dolutegravir-based regimen can pose challenges because of uncertainty around whether dolutegravir resistance has actually developed and switching is needed, or whether only interventions to improve adherence without switching are sufficient. These considerations should be addressed to consolidate expected gains from widespread introduction of dolutegravir in low-income and middle-income countries.

Bictegravir in a fixed-dose tablet with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of HIV infection: pharmacology and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Current antiretroviral therapy is more effective and simpler than in previous times due to the development of new drugs with improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and the advent of single pill regimens with low toxicity that facilitate long-term adherence. The recent approval of the novel potent integrase strand-transfer inhibitor bictegravir (BIC) co-formulated with emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in a fixed daily dose pill, B/F/TAF, adds to the list of single-tablet regimens available to treat HIV infection. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the pharmacological and clinical information obtained from MEDLINE/PubMed publications and the latest international conferences. Expert opinion: BIC is a potent antiretroviral with an improved resistance profile over previous integrase inhibitors. Its combination with the new tenofovir prodrug TAF and FTC creates an effective regimen B/F/TAF for treatment-naïve patients and for those switching from another successful combination. B/F/TAF's favorable pharmacokinetic profile, simple dose, low pill burden, and few drug-drug interactions or treatment-related adverse events, will make it one of the preferred regimens in the future.