The relationship of the value of outcome comparisons to the number of patients per provider

Do Cardiac Surgery Report Cards Reduce Mortality? Assessing the Evidence

Provider report cards feature prominently in ongoing efforts to improve patient quality. A well-known example is the cardiac surgery report-card program started in New York, which publicly compares hospital and surgeon performance. Public report cards have been associated with decreases in cardiac surgery mortality, but there is substantial disagreement over the source(s) of the improvement. This article develops a conceptual framework to explain how report-card-related responses could result in lower mortality and reviews the evidence. Existing research shows that report cards have not greatly changed referral patterns. How much providers increased their quality of care and altered their selection of patients remains unresolved, and alternative explanations have not been well studied. Future research should expand the number of states and years covered and exploit the variation in institutional features to improve our understanding of the relationship between report cards and outcomes.

The meaning of early mortality after CABG

OBJECTIVE

Investigations of early mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are predominantly based on 30-day mortality or hospital mortality. The advantages, disadvantages, and usefulness of hospital mortality and 30-day mortality analyses to investigate the early risk after CABG are evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 4985 patients underwent isolated CABG from June 1988 to June 1997. A follow-up was performed 180 days after CABG (response rate: 98.6%).

RESULTS

The mean hospital stay was 13.5+/-9.6 days, the range was 0 to 142 days (25% quartile, 9 days; median, 12 days; 75% quartile, 15 days). The hospital mortality was 5.3%. The 30-day mortality was 5.6%. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier curve of the time interval 0-180 days postoperatively proves the persistence of the still decreasing behaviour of the survival curve beyond the 30th day until about the 60th postoperative day. Stratified by era of operation, the 'early phase' after CABG seems to be prolonged beyond 30 days at least for the more recent operation era since 1991. Risk stratification proves that the higher the risk group, the more the early phase tends towards a prolongation.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospital mortality reflects institutional habits concerning postoperative patient care. Therefore, a systematic underestimation of early mortality is likely. In contrast to hospital stay, the evaluation of 30-day mortality requires a follow-up procedure but allows interinstitutional comparisons. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality systematically underestimates the early risk, at least in the more recent CABG period. So, a standardized evaluation of a longer time period (p.e. 180 days) is recommended.