A study of the interaction of roxithromycin with theophylline and carbamazepine

Importance of multi-p450 inhibition in drug-drug interactions: evaluation of incidence, inhibition magnitude, and prediction from in vitro data

Drugs that are mainly cleared by a single enzyme are considered more sensitive to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) than drugs cleared by multiple pathways. However, whether this is true when a drug cleared by multiple pathways is coadministered with an inhibitor of multiple P450 enzymes (multi-P450 inhibition) is not known. Mathematically, simultaneous equipotent inhibition of two elimination pathways that each contribute half of the drug clearance is equal to equipotent inhibition of a single pathway that clears the drug. However, simultaneous strong or moderate inhibition of two pathways by a single inhibitor is perceived as an unlikely scenario. The aim of this study was (i) to identify P450 inhibitors currently in clinical use that can inhibit more than one clearance pathway of an object drug in vivo and (ii) to evaluate the magnitude and predictability of DDIs caused by these multi-P450 inhibitors. Multi-P450 inhibitors were identified using the Metabolism and Transport Drug Interaction Database. A total of 38 multi-P450 inhibitors, defined as inhibitors that increased the AUC or decreased the clearance of probes of two or more P450s, were identified. Seventeen (45%) multi-P450 inhibitors were strong inhibitors of at least one P450, and an additional 12 (32%) were moderate inhibitors of one or more P450s. Only one inhibitor (fluvoxamine) was a strong inhibitor of more than one enzyme. Fifteen of the multi-P450 inhibitors also inhibit drug transporters in vivo, but such data are lacking on many of the inhibitors. Inhibition of multiple P450 enzymes by a single inhibitor resulted in significant (>2-fold) clinical DDIs with drugs that are cleared by multiple pathways such as imipramine and diazepam, while strong P450 inhibitors resulted in only weak DDIs with these object drugs. The magnitude of the DDIs between multi-P450 inhibitors and diazepam, imipramine, and omeprazole could be predicted using in vitro data with similar accuracy as probe substrate studies with the same inhibitors. The results of this study suggest that inhibition of multiple clearance pathways in vivo is clinically relevant, and the risk of DDIs with object drugs may be best evaluated in studies using multi-P450 inhibitors.

Factors contributing to carbamazepine-macrolide interactions

Certain macrolides (e.g. clarithromycin or erythromycin) are known to interact with the carbamazepine antiepileptic drug. Carbamazepine-macrolide interaction leads to an increase in the level of carbamazepine in the blood, so inducing carbamazepine toxicity. The aim of this paper is to compare the extent of the interaction for each macrolide and to study the effects of age, gender, weight, the carbamazepine and macrolide dosages and the use of other antiepileptic drugs on the extent of the carbamazepine-macrolide interaction. Case reports published in the literature were reviewed and analysed to this end. The results show that three macrolides (erythromycin, troleandomycin and, to a lesser extent, clarithromycin) may induce carbamazepine toxicity in clinical practice. Furthermore, it was observed that high dosages of carbamazepine or macrolides and the use of concurrent anticonvulsivant drugs in the case of patients below 60 years of age are associated with the highest carbamazepine levels in carbamazepine-macrolide interactions. This study should help physicians choose a macrolide that does not interact with carbamazepine and evaluate the risk of an interaction between carbamazepine and macrolides.

Macrolide drug interactions: an update

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current drug interaction profiles for the commonly used macrolides in the US and Europe, and to comment on the clinical impact of these interactions.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1975-1998) was performed to identify all pertinent studies, review articles, and case reports. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers.

STUDY SELECTION

All available data were reviewed to provide an unbiased account of possible drug interactions.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data for some of the interactions were not available from the literature, but were available from abstracts or company-supplied materials. Although the data were not always explicit, the best attempt was made to deliver pertinent information that clinical practitioners would need to formulate practice opinions. When more in-depth information was supplied in the form of a review or study report, a thorough explanation of pertinent methodology was supplied.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Several clinically significant drug interactions have been identified since the approval of erythromycin. These interactions usually were related to the inhibition of the cytochrome P450 enzyme systems, which are responsible for the metabolism of many drugs. The decreased metabolism by the macrolides has in some instances resulted in potentially severe adverse events. The development and marketing of newer macrolides are hoped to improve the drug interaction profile associated with this class. However, this has produced variable success. Some of the newer macrolides demonstrated an interaction profile similar to that of erythromycin; others have improved profiles. The most success in avoiding drug interactions related to the inhibition of cytochrome P450 has been through the development of the azalide subclass, of which azithromycin is the first and only to be marketed. Azithromycin has not been demonstrated to inhibit the cytochrome P450 system in studies using a human liver microsome model, and to date has produced none of the classic drug interactions characteristic of the macrolides.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the available data regarding macrolide drug interactions are from studies in healthy volunteers and case reports. These data suggest that clarithromycin appears to have an interaction profile similar to that of erythromycin. Given this similarity, it is important to consider the interaction profile of clarithromycin when using erythromycin. This is especially necessary as funds for further studies of a medication available in generic form (e.g., erythromycin) are limited. Azithromycin has produced few clinically significant interactions with any agent cleared through the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Although the available data are promising, the final test should come from studies conducted in patients who are taking potentially interacting compounds on a chronic basis.

The acceptability, efficacy and safety of a new paediatric oral suspension of roxithromycin in respiratory tract infections

A new paediatric formulation of roxithromycin was tested for acceptability, efficacy and safety in a multicentre, prospective, non-comparative trial in 210 children, aged between 2 and 8 years, with a variety of respiratory tract infections. Most children were diagnosed as having rhinobronchitis, acute pharyngitis or acute tonsillitis. A dose of 5-8 mg/kg/day (mean +/- SD, 5.92 +/- 1.12) roxithromycin was given orally for 5-10 days (mean +/- SDL 6.86 +/- 1.80). The formulation consists of a tablet for suspension in a small volume of water, administered using a spoon, twice daily. Acceptability was good, with only eight children refusing their medication because of the taste or because of vomiting. The method of administration was found to be convenient by 76% of parents. The clinical success rate was 89.1% in the intent-to-treat analysis. There were only 18 adverse events reported by 14 patients; of these, only 10 events (all gastrointestinal) in eight patients were classified as drug related. A total of eight patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event, but in only four were the events drug related.

Drug interactions of macrolides: emphasis on dirithromycin

OBJECTIVE

To describe the drug interactions of dirithromycin, a new macrolide, and to compare them with those of other macrolides.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE to identify articles published between January 1980 and July 1995 concerning the drug interactions of macrolides. Published abstracts were also examined. All studies using dirithromycin were performed under the sponsorship of Eli Lilly and Company.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Erythromycin, the first macrolide discovered, is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. By decreasing their metabolism, erythromycin can interact with other drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzymes. The lack of such interactions would be a desirable feature in a newer macrolide. We describe studies performed to detect any interactions of dirithromycin with cyclosporine, theophylline, terfenadine, warfarin, and ethinyl estradiol. The studies showed that dirithromycin, like azithromycin, is much less likely to cause the interactions detected with clarithromycin and erythromycin. A review of the literature showed differences among macrolides in their abilities to inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes and, thus, to cause drug-drug interactions. Erythromycin and clarithromycin inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes, and have been implicated in clinically significant interactions. Azithromycin and dirithromycin neither inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes nor are implicated in clinically significant drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dirithromycin, a new macrolide, does not inhibit the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. The concomitant use of dirithromycin with cyclosporine, theophylline, terfenadine, warfarin, or ethinyl estradiol was studied in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. In vitro, dirithromycin did not bind cytochrome P450. In healthy subjects, erythromycin increases the clearance of cyclosporine by 51%, whereas dirithromycin causes no significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine. In kidney transplant recipients, administration of dirithromycin was associated with a significant (p < 0.003) decrease of 17.4% in the clearance of cyclosporine. In patients taking low-dose estradiol, the administration of dirithromycin caused a significant (p < 0.03) increase of 9.9% in the clearance of ethinyl estradiol; escape ovulation did not occur. Unlike erythromycin and clarithromycin, dirithromycin had no significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, terfenadine, or warfarin. The alterations typical of drug interactions that are based on inhibition of the cytochrome P450 system occurring with erythromycin and clarithromycin were not observed with dirithromycin.

Macrolides versus azalides: a drug interaction update

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current drug interaction profiles for all approved and investigational macrolide and azalide antimicrobials, and to comment on the clinical impact of these interactions when appropriate.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE was searched to identify all pertinent studies, review articles, and case reports from 1975 to 1995. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers.

STUDY SELECTION

All available data were reviewed to give an unbiased account of possible drug interactions.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data for some of the interactions were not available from the literature, but were available from abstracts or from company-supplied materials. Although the data were not always entirely explicative, the best attempt was made to deliver the pertinent information that clinical practitioners would need to formulate practice opinions. When more in-depth information was supplied in the form of a review or study report, a thorough explanation of pertinent methodology was supplied.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Since the introduction of erythromycin into clinical practice, there have been several clinically significant drug interactions identified throughout the literature associated with this drug. These interactions have been caused mostly by inhibition of the CYP3A subclass of hepatic enzymes, thereby decreasing the metabolism of any other agent given concurrently that is also cleared through this mechanism. With the development and marketing of several new macrolides, it was hoped that the drug interaction profile associated with this class would improve. This has been met with variable success. Although some of the extensions of the 14-membered ring macrolides have shown an incidence of interactions equal to that of erythromycin, others have shown improved profiles. In contrast, the 16-membered ring macrolides have demonstrated a much improved, though not absent, interaction profile. The most success in avoiding drug interactions through structure modification has been accomplished with the development of the azalide class, of which azithromycin is the first to be approved for marketing. This agent has to date produced none of the classic drug interactions that most macrolides have demonstrated in patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of new 14- and 16-membered ring macrolides appears to have had a variable effect in modifying the incidence of drug interactions associated with this class. Azithromycin, a member of the new azalide class, has to date produced fewer clinically significant interactions than other azalides with any agent that is cleared through the CYP3A system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Macrolide antibacterials. Drug interactions of clinical significance

Macrolide antibiotics can interact adversely with commonly used drugs, usually by altering metabolism due to complex formation and inhibition of cytochrome P-450 IIIA4 (CYP3A4) in the liver and enterocytes. In addition, pharmacokinetic drug interactions with macrolides can result from their antibiotic effect on microorganisms of the enteric flora, and through enhanced gastric emptying due to a motilin-like effect. Macrolides may be classified into 3 different groups according to their affinity for CYP3A4, and thus their propensity to cause pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Troleandomycin, erythromycin and its prodrugs decrease drug metabolism and may produce drug interactions (group 1). Others, including clarithromycin, flurithromycin, midecamycin, midecamycin acetate (miocamycin; ponsinomycin), josamycin and roxithromycin (group 2) rarely cause interactions. Azithromycin, dirithromycin, rikamycin and spiramycin (group 3) do not inactivate CYP3A4 and do not engender these adverse effects. Drug interactions with carbamazepine, cyclosporin, terfenadine, astemizole and theophylline represent the most frequently encountered interactions with macrolide antibiotics. If the combination of a macrolide and one of these compounds cannot be avoided, serum concentrations of concurrently administered drugs should be monitored and patients observed for signs of toxicity. Rare interactions and those of dubious clinical importance are those with alfentanil and sufentanil, antacids and cimetidine, oral anticoagulants, bromocriptine, clozapine, oral contraceptive steroids, digoxin, disopyramide, ergot alkaloids, felodipine, glibenclamide (glyburide), levodopa/carbidopa, lovastatin, methylprednisolone, phenazone (antipyrine), phenytoin, rifabutin and rifampicin (rifampin), triazolam and midazolam, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and zidovudine.

Roxithromycin reduces the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with asthma

We evaluated the effects of a new semisynthetic macrolide antibiotic, roxithromycin, on the bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine in children with asthma. Twelve hospitalized asthmatic children, aged 11 to 15 years (mean age, 12.9 years), were enrolled in this study. They were treated with 150 mg of roxithromycin once a day orally for 8 weeks without any side effects. The PC20 value 4 or 8 weeks after the administration of roxithromycin increased significantly over the initial values (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively). No significant change was observed in serum theophylline concentrations during this study. Serum cortisol level in the morning did not change after the administration of roxithromycin for 4 weeks. These results suggest that administration of roxithromycin may act favorably in the treatment of childhood asthma.

Roxithromycin. An update of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Roxithromycin is a derivative of the macrolide antibacterial erythromycin with in vitro antibacterial activity resembling that of the parent compound. The drug has activity against some Staphylococcus spp., many Streptococcus spp., Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Chlamydia trachomatis as well as many less common organisms. Measured using recently proposed guidelines, roxithromycin has in vitro activity against Haemophilus influenzae. In comparison with that of its parent compound, the pharmacokinetic profile of roxithromycin is characterised by high plasma, tissue and body fluid concentrations and a long half-life permitting an extended dosage interval. Roxithromycin has proven clinical efficacy in upper and lower respiratory infections, skin and soft tissue infections, urogenital infections and orodental infections, and appears to be as effective as more established treatments including erythromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefaclor. The drug has also shown promise in a variety of more specialised indications including opportunistic infections in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients and as part of a Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen. Roxithromycin is very well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events of approximately 4%. Thus, roxithromycin is an attractive therapeutic alternative in its established indications, especially when the option of once-daily administration is considered.

A pharmacokinetic interaction between roxithromycin and midazolam

The interaction between roxithromycin and midazolam was investigated in a double-blind, randomised crossover study of two phases. Ten healthy volunteers were given roxithromycin (300 mg) or placebo once daily for 6 days. On the sixth day they ingested 15 mg midazolam. Plasma samples were collected and psychomotor performance measured for 17 h. Roxithromycin administration significantly increased the area under the plasma midazolam concentration-time curve from 8.3 to 12.2 micrograms.ml-1.min and the elimination half-lives from 1.7 to 2.2 h. In psychomotor performance only minor differences were seen between the treatments in one of the measured psychomotor parameters. Thus, in contrast to the strong interaction between erythromycin and midazolam, the interaction between roxithromycin and midazolam appears less likely to be clinically significant.

Clarithromycin-carbamazepine interaction: a case report

We report a clinically relevant interaction between a new macrolide antibiotic, clarithromycin, and carbamazepine (CBZ). In a patient receiving CBZ monotherapy, 10-day antibiotic treatment increased CBZ concentration despite concomitant CBZ dose reduction and doubled the CBZ concentration/dose ratio. Concentration of the CBZ epoxide (CBZ-E) metabolite was reduced, suggesting that the interaction occurs at a metabolic level.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of macrolides

The macrolide antibiotics include natural members, prodrugs and semisynthetic derivatives. These drugs are indicated in a variety of infections and are often combined with other drug therapies, thus creating the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions. Macrolides can both inhibit drug metabolism in the liver by complex formation and inactivation of microsomal drug oxidising enzymes and also interfere with microorganisms of the enteric flora through their antibiotic effects. Over the past 20 years, a number of reports have incriminated macrolides as a potential source of clinically severe drug interactions. However, differences have been found between the various macrolides in this regard and not all macrolides are responsible for drug interactions. With the recent advent of many semisynthetic macrolide antibiotics it is now evident that they may be classified into 3 different groups in causing drug interactions. The first group (e.g. troleandomycin, erythromycins) are those prone to forming nitrosoalkanes and the consequent formation of inactive cytochrome P450-metabolite complexes. The second group (e.g. josamycin, flurithromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, miocamycin and midecamycin) form complexes to a lesser extent and rarely produce drug interactions. The last group (e.g. spiramycin, rokitamycin, dirithromycin and azithromycin) do not inactivate cytochrome P450 and are unable to modify the pharmacokinetics of other compounds. It appears that 2 structural factors are important for a macrolide antibiotic to lead to the induction of cytochrome P450 and the formation in vivo or in vitro of an inhibitory cytochrome P450-iron-nitrosoalkane metabolite complex: the presence in the macrolide molecules of a non-hindered readily accessible N-dimethylamino group and the hydrophobic character of the drug. Troleandomycin ranks first as a potent inhibitor of microsomal liver enzymes, causing a significant decrease of the metabolism of methylprednisolone, theophylline, carbamazepine, phenazone (antipyrine) and triazolam. Troleandomycin can cause ergotism in patients receiving ergot alkaloids and cholestatic jaundice in those taking oral contraceptives. Erythromycin and its different prodrugs appear to be less potent inhibitors of drug metabolism. Case reports and controlled studies have, however, shown that erythromycins may interact with theophylline, carbamazepine, methylprednisolone, warfarin, cyclosporin, triazolam, midazolam, alfentanil, disopyramide and bromocriptine, decreasing drug clearance. The bioavailability of digoxin appears also to be increased by erythromycin in patients excreting high amounts of reduced digoxin metabolites, probably due to destruction of enteric flora responsible for the formation of these compounds. These incriminated macrolide antibiotics should not be administered concomitantly with other drugs known to be affected metabolically by them, or at the very least, combined administration should be carried out only with careful patient monitoring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of roxithromycin and influence of H2-blockers and antacids on gastrointestinal absorption

The pharmacokinetics of roxithromycin (300 mg orally) and the influence of the antacid aluminum magnesium hydroxide and the H2-blocker ranitidine on bioavailability of roxithromycin in ten healthy volunteers were studied. Pharmacokinetics after a single dose of roxithromycin were characterized by high peak serum levels (9.1 +/- 2.1 mg/l) and a long elimination half-life (7.2 +/- 2.5 h), resulting in a large area under the curve (116.9 +/- 32.7 mg h/l). High inter- and intraindividual variations were found for both the absorption time and the elimination half-life. The bioavailability of roxithromycin was not affected by coadministration with antacids or ranitidine.

The new macrolide antibiotics: azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and roxithromycin

OBJECTIVE

To review the chemistry, antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, adverse effects, and drug interactions of four new macrolide antibiotics: azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and roxithromycin.

DATA SOURCES

Information was obtained from comparative clinical trials, abstracts, conference proceedings, and review articles. Indexing terms included azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, erythromycin, roxithromycin, and macrolide antibiotics.

STUDY SELECTION

Emphasis was placed on comparative clinical trials involving the new macrolide antibiotics.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from human studies published in the English language were evaluated. Trials were assessed by sample size, macrolide dosage regimen, and therapeutic response.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The erythromycins have gained widespread use in treating a variety of infections. Although they are effective, limitations include the need to administer four times a day and the intolerable adverse gastrointestinal effects. Four of the more extensively studied agents, azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and roxithromycin, are currently being studied in patients. Based on the studies to date, the newer macrolides may offer several advantages over erythromycin, including: (1) greater antimicrobial activity against certain organisms; (2) longer elimination half-life, thus allowing less frequent administration; and (3) lower incidence of adverse gastrointestinal effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The new macrolide antibiotics appear to offer an improvement over erythromycin. Definitive conclusions about the role of these drugs should await completion of ongoing clinical studies.

Efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin in comparison with erythromycin stearate in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

The efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. were compared with those of erythromycin stearate 500 mg b.i.d. in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Out of 86 patients recruited for the study, 79 were evaluable for tolerance and 76 for efficacy. These patients were evenly distributed among the 3 investigational clinics, with 26, 25 and 28 patients, respectively. The diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections was based on clinical, laboratory, radiological and/or physical findings and, when available, bacteriological and serological findings. The duration of treatment was 10 days, with follow-up at post-treatment visits directly after treatment and 6 weeks thereafter. The clinical outcome was satisfactory with no significant difference between the drugs. More patients reporting adverse events were on erythromycin than on roxithromycin (51.3% vs 17.5%; p = 0.003). The results suggest that roxithromycin is as effective as erythromycin stearate in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and causes fewer adverse effects.

The future role and importance of macrolides

The new macrolides, notably clarithromycin and azithromycin, are significant advances over previous agents. With an extended antibacterial spectrum, increased activity, improved absorption and excellent tissue and intracellular penetration, they realize therapeutic aims which have been increasingly sought in the 1980s. They are likely to find an extended role in respiratory tract infections, especially in community-acquired pneumonia, where the activity against beta-lactam-resistant bacteria and intracellular pathogens, e.g. Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella spp. and Chlamydia pneumoniae have a significant role to play. Realistic twice or once daily dosing will prove a powerful argument for their use and the major improvement in gastrointestinal tolerance compared with erythromycin is likely to prove a deciding factor in their favour.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between theophylline and other medication (Part II)

Part I of this article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, covered the effects or lack of effects on theophylline clearance of sympathomimetics, corticosteroids, antihistamines and other antiallergy drugs, antimicrobial agents, phenytoin, carbamazepine, barbiturates, antacids and activated charcoal. In Part II, this discussion is extended to the effects of other agents. Overall summaries, both textual and tabular, appear in Part I.

Lack of effect of ponsinomycin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of theophylline

The influence of ponsinomycin on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline has been studied in 12 young healthy volunteers. They received 10 doses of theophylline 200 mg every 8 h p.o., successively in the absence and then in the presence of ponsinomycin. This new macrolide, structurally related to midecamycin, was given in the therapeutic dose of 800 mg b.d. for 5 days, starting 2 days before the second phase of treatment with theophylline. The pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, calculated from its plasma concentration at steady-state, were not affected by the co-treatment. In particular, there was no significant difference between the peak and trough plasma levels, apparent clearance or apparent elimination half-life of theophylline in the absence and the presence of ponsinomycin. Only renal clearance was slightly (27%) but significantly increased by the co-treatment. The results suggest that ponsinomycin would be a good choice if a macrolide antibiotic were needed in patients being treated with theophylline.

Roxithromycin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy

Roxithromycin is an acid-stable orally administered antibacterial macrolide structurally related to erythromycin. It has an in vitro antibacterial profile similar to that of erythromycin, with activity against Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, Branhamella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia trachomatis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Haemophilus ducreyi, some anaerobes and other less common pathogens. Roxithromycin has a pharmacokinetic profile that is characterised by excellent enteral absorption achieving high concentrations in most tissues and body fluids. The results of clinical studies with roxithromycin have confirmed the potential for its use in a variety of infections, which was suggested by its antibacterial activity in vitro and pharmacokinetic profile. Clinical efficacy has been confirmed in the treatment of respiratory tract infections, including community-acquired and atypical pneumonias, ear, nose and throat infections, genitourinary tract infections, and skin and soft tissue infections. In a relatively small number of patients roxithromycin has generally been shown to be as effective as erythromycin and other appropriate antibacterial drugs in some of the above indications. Roxithromycin is well tolerated and has less potential than erythromycin to produce clinically significant drug interactions. Thus, roxithromycin is an orally active drug which should prove a useful alternative when selecting antibacterial therapy for indications where macrolides are appropriate.

In vivo and in vitro effects of a new macrolide antibiotic roxithromycin on rat liver cytochrome P-450: comparison with troleandomycin and erythromycin

The effects of a new macrolide antibiotic (Roxithromycin) and one of its major metabolite (RU 39001) on rat hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes were compared to those of erythromycin, erythralosamine and troleandomycin (TAO) both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast to erythromycin, erythralosamine and TAO, roxithromycin and its metabolite RU 39001 exhibit: (i) a very poor affinity for rat liver cytochrome P-450, (ii) an unability to be metabolized into a stable inhibitory metabolite-cytochrome P-450 complex and (iii) a decreased ability to induce liver cytochrome P-450 PCNE, an isozyme implicated in drug associations involving some macrolide antibiotics.