The in-vitro degradation at 37 degrees C of vancomycin in serum, CAPD fluid and phosphate-buffered saline

Simple and rapid method for analysis of urinary vancomycin using solid phase extraction and fluorescence spectroscopy

Vancomycin (VCM) is an antimicrobial that is recommended for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for maintaining the efficacy and safety of treatment. The trough monitoring has been used to guide VCM dosing regimens. However, newer guidelines recommend the use of area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC)-guided vancomycin dosing, and there is a need for easier and more frequent measurements of VCM concentrations. Therefore, in this study, we developed a simple and rapid analytical method for measuring urinary VCM by combining solid-phase extraction and fluorescence analysis. Urine samples are easier and less invasive than blood samples. In addition to the therapeutic range of blood VCM, this method was also able to measure 0.01–1 mg/mL, which is the concentration range of urinary VCM. The accuracy of 10, 20, and 30 μg/mL VCM solutions were between 93.18 and 109.76%. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of intra-day and inter-day analysis were less than 6.25% and 6.28%, respectively. Since this method does not use large equipment, it is expected to be better suited for clinical use.

Studies on the metabolism and degradation of vancomycin in simulated in vitro and aquatic environment by UHPLC-Triple-TOF-MS/MS

Vancomycin is one of the most commonly used glycopeptide antiobiotics, and as such is an important emerging environmental contaminant. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), such as antibiotics, are problematic since wastewater treatment processes are not completely effective at removing these chemical compounds. Since wastewater treatment processes are not completely effective, vancomycin occurs in surface water. Vancomycin and its metabolites in vivo and degradation products in aquatic environment may lead to undesirable ecological effects that threaten the environment or cause undesirable reactions that affect human health. We aimed to study vancomycin metabolism in vitro and its natural degradation in aquatic environment, as well as explore for related metabolites and degradation products. Accordingly, we established four systems, using a constant temperature oscillator at 37 °C for 10 days for vancomycin in activated rat liver microsomes (experimental system), inactivated rat liver microsomes (control system), phosphate buffer saline (PBS system) and pure water (pure water system), as well as an additional system of activated rat liver microsomes without vancomycin (blank system). The metabolism and degradation of vancomycin were studied using a high resolution and high sensitivity ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)-Triple-time of flight (TOF)-mass spectrometry (MS) method in positive ion mode. The compared result of activated rat liver microsomes system and inactivated rat liver microsomes system confirms that vancomycin is not metabolized in the liver. Vancomycin was degraded in the four non-blank incubation systems. The MetabolitePilot 2.0 software was used for screening the probable degradation products, as well as for establishing its associated degradation pathways. Eventually, four degradation products were identified and their chemical structures were deduced. The results of this study provide a foundation for evaluation of the effects of vancomycin and its degradation products on environmental safety and human health in the future.

Clinical utility of antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite block for treatment of intractable periprosthetic joint infection and septic arthritis of the hip

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite block (AHAB) allows gradual release of antibiotics for long duration without thermal damage and, therefore, is potentially a more effective antibacterial spacer than antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement (ALAC). The purposes of this study are to assess the utility of AHAB for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or septic arthritis (SA) of the hip and to assess the potency of AHAB and ALAC in vitro.

METHODS

AHAB was utilized in two-stage reconstruction surgery for 20 PJI and 7 SA patients. Clinical success was confirmed if the patients did not show any sign of recurrence of infection during the follow-up period. Duration and amount of active vancomycin (VCM) released from AHAB and ALAC spacer were investigated in vitro.

RESULTS

Two-stage reconstruction using AHAB significantly improved hip function and showed 100% clinical success with mean follow-up of 37 months. The in vitro duration of the active effect of VCM released from AHAB (21 days) was longer than that from ALAC (7 days) and the amount of active VCM released from AHAB was higher than that from ALAC.

CONCLUSIONS

AHAB promises to release higher amounts of active VCM for longer durations than ALAC; therefore, it is a promising treatment for intractable PJI or SA.

New antimicrobial and biocompatible implant coating with synergic silver-vancomycin conjugate action

Materials foreign to the body are used ever more frequently, as increasing numbers of patients require implants. As a consequence, the numbers of implant-related infections have grown as well, and with increasing resistance. Treatments often fail; thus, new antibacterial coating strategies are being developed by scientists to avoid, or at least strongly reduce, bacterial adhesion to implant surfaces. In this study, we focused on producing a self-protective coating combining silver(I) ions and a vancomycin-derived molecule, intelligent pyridinate vancomycin (IPV), with a synergetic and effective action against bacteria. These Ag(I) -IPV conjugate-coated surfaces are well characterized and exhibit strong bactericidal activity in vitro against Staphylococci strains. Furthermore, the released quantities of both drugs from the coated surfaces do not affect their biocompatibility and soft tissue integration. These newly developed Ag(I) -IPV conjugate coatings thus represent a possible and efficient protection method against bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation during and after implant surgery.

Development of chitosan-vancomycin antimicrobial coatings on titanium implants

Techniques for titanium surface modification have been studied for applications in orthopedic implants specifically for local drug delivery. The extensive research in surface modification is driving the development of devices that integrate infection prevention, osseointegration, and functionality in a structural role. In this study, vancomycin was applied to modified titanium surfaces to determine the effect of surface morphology on drug loading and release profiles. The antimicrobial effectiveness of the released vancomycin was evaluated and found to have a similar effect as the standard vancomycin. The engineered surfaces included sandblasted, sandblasted acid etched, electrochemically etched, and sandblasted electrochemically etched. The antibiotic release was observed to be independent of the measured surface parameters of the engineered surfaces. The development of an implantable device in which the surface morphology can be tailored for an application with no effect on the total drug released would be beneficial to more precisely control the biological response while maintaining local drug delivery for infection prevention.

Generic vancomycin products fail in vivo despite being pharmaceutical equivalents of the innovator

Generic versions of intravenous antibiotics are not required to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence with the innovator because therapeutic equivalence is assumed from pharmaceutical equivalence. To test such assumptions, we studied three generic versions of vancomycin in simultaneous experiments with the innovator and determined the concentration and potency of the active pharmaceutical ingredient by microbiological assay, single-dose pharmacokinetics in infected mice, antibacterial effect by broth microdilution and time-kill curves (TKC), and pharmacodynamics against two wild-type strains of Staphylococcus aureus by using the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. The main outcome measure was the comparison of magnitudes and patterns of in vivo efficacy between generic products and the innovator. Except for one product exhibiting slightly greater concentration, vancomycin generics were undistinguishable from the innovator based on concentration and potency, protein binding, in vitro antibacterial effect determined by minimal inhibitory or bactericidal concentrations and TKC, and serum pharmacokinetics. Despite such similarities, all generic products failed in vivo to kill S. aureus, while the innovator displayed the expected bactericidal efficacy: maximum antibacterial effect (Emax) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.04 (1.89 to 2.19), 2.59 (2.21 to 2.98), and 3.48 (2.92 to 4.04) versus 5.65 (5.52 to 5.78) log10 CFU/g for three generics and the innovator product, respectively (P<0.0001, any comparison). Nonlinear regression analysis suggests that generic versions of vancomycin contain inhibitory and stimulatory principles within their formulations that cause agonistic-antagonistic actions responsible for in vivo failure. In conclusion, pharmaceutical equivalence does not imply therapeutic equivalence for vancomycin.

Release of antibiotics from polymethylmethacrylate cement

The increase in resistance rates to antibiotics of bacteria isolated from infected hip joints, particularly staphylococci, prompted us to investigate the usefulness of antibiotic combinations such as gentamicin plus vancomycin. Cylinder test specimens of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement (Cemex, Tecres) containing gentamicin alone, vancomycin alone and both drugs in combination, were studied. The antibiotic concentrations were determined using a microbiological method and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The release of gentamicin alone, vancomycin alone and in combination from PMMA cement was prompt. The combination revealed synergistic antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. FPIA showed that gentamicin and vancomycin delivery rates from PMMA cement were different. Gentamicin alone and in combination with vancomycin presented similar release rates from PMMA cement (1.50%). Vancomycin release from PMMA cylinders impregnated with the combination was lower (0.51%) than that from cylinders with vancomycin alone (1.16%). Vancomycin showed a 34.1% loss of microbiological activity at 37 degrees C after 10 days of incubation; the reduction corresponded to 15.0% when measured by FPIA. Results obtained with test specimens are indicative for the preparation of antibiotic-impregnated cements for different human prostheses.

New sensitive assay of vancomycin in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection

A method using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection for the analysis of vancomycin in human plasma was developed. Chromatographic conditions included an octadecyl column, a mobile phase of acetonitrile-sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) (12:88), a total run time of 12 min, and coulometric electrochemical detection at +700 mV. Linear detector response was found in the range 5-100 microg ml(-1) after a 1:80 dilution or from 0.5 to 50 microg ml(-1) after a 1:20 dilution of the samples. In both cases the correlation coefficient (r) of the calibration curve standard was better than 0.995. Vancomycin determination was based on a denaturation of plasma proteins with methanol, then a dilution with mobile phase was performed. Recovery of vancomycin from plasma was 103.1+/-3.9%, and no interference from commonly used drugs or endogenous compounds was observed. A significant correlation was shown with the EMIT assay (r=0.92, P<0.001) using clinical samples from children. This HPLC technique is simple, sensitive, rapid, precise, selective and requires only 100 microl of plasma for completion.

Vancomycin assay performance in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of polyclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (pFPIA) with that of enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) in patients receiving vancomycin and hemodialysis.

SETTING

Outpatient hemodialysis center.

PATIENTS

Seven subjects with end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis 3 times/week with a cellulose triacetate hemodialyzer.

INTERVENTION

Subjects received vancomycin 1000 mg intradialytically during the first study session and 750 mg every other hemodialysis session thereafter for 4 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood samples were obtained throughout the study, and vancomycin serum concentrations were determined by pFPIA and EMIT. The mean +/- SD difference (estimate of bias) between assays was -1.10 +/- 1.35 mg/L. The limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 1.96 x SD) between them were -3.80-1.60 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the manufacturer's changes in the vancomycin pFPIA eliminated overestimation of drug concentrations in patients undergoing high-permeability hemodialysis.

Accuracy of measured vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

To review information related to the accuracy of vancomycin serum drug concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease, focusing on available assays and mechanisms of cross-reactivity.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles identified from a MEDLINE search (January 1980-June 1999) and through secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified were evaluated, and all relevant information was included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Falsely elevated vancomycin serum concentrations may occur in patients with renal dysfunction. The underlying mechanism is due to the formation and accumulation of a pseudo-metabolite, the vancomycin crystalline degradation product (CDP). Vancomycin is converted to CDP when exposed to heat, including normal body temperature. Because the molecular structures of CDP and vancomycin are similar, both molecules are detected by polyclonal immunoassay systems used in clinical laboratories. This cross-reactivity leads to falsely elevated serum vancomycin concentrations in excess of 50-70%. Such large assay inaccuracies may result in improper dosage adjustments and therapeutic failures. A monoclonal immunoassay system has been developed that does not significantly cross-react with CDP.

CONCLUSIONS

To appropriately interpret laboratory results, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of the vancomycin-CDP cross-reactivity problem and to be familiar with the specific assay used to measure vancomycin concentrations in patients with renal dysfunction.

Implications of vancomycin degradation products on therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with end-stage renal disease

In renally impaired patients, vancomycin concentrations typically are maintained at body temperature for extended periods of time due to the drug's prolonged half-life. Both time and increased temperature potentiate production of vancomycin crystalline degradation products (CDP-1). Commercially available vancomycin assays, such as fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPI) and radioimmunoassay, cross-react with CDP-1 isomers. Overestimation of vancomycin concentrations by 40-53% due to cross-reactivity of CDP-1 with active factor B vancomycin occurs with FPI. As FPI is the most common method of analyzing serum vancomycin, clinicians must be aware of its potential shortcomings and be prepared to alter vancomycin dosages in renally impaired patients. The possibility of adverse affects due to elevated concentrations of CDP-1 or therapeutic failures due to subtherapeutic levels of factor B vancomycin cannot be excluded.

The therapeutic monitoring of antimicrobial agents

AIMS

To review the basis and optimal use of therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobial agents.

METHODS

Antimicrobial agents for which a reasonable case exists for therapeutic drug monitoring were reviewed under the following headings: pharmacokinetics, why monitor, therapeutic range, individualisation of therapy, sampling times, methods of analysis, interpretative problems and cost-effectiveness of monitoring.

RESULTS

There is a strong historical case for monitoring aminoglycosides. The recent move to once-daily dosing means that criteria for therapeutic drug monitoring need to be redefined. Vancomycin has been monitored routinely but many questions remain about the most appropriate approach to this. A case can be made for monitoring teicoplanin, flucytosine and itraconazole in certain circumstances.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach to monitoring aminoglycosides needs to be redefined in the light of once-daily dosing. It is premature to suggest that less stringent monitoring is necessary as toxicity remains a problem with these drugs. The ideal method of monitoring vancomycin remains to be defined although a reasonable case exists for measuring trough concentrations, mainly to ensure efficacy. Teicoplanin is monitored occasionally to ensure efficacy while flucytosine is monitored occasionally to avoid high concentrations associated with toxicity. Itraconazole has various pharmacokinetic problems and monitoring has been suggested to ensure that adequate concentrations are achieved.

Laboratory guidelines for monitoring of antimicrobial drugs

Few antimicrobial drugs meet the requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring. Those that are monitored include the aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin), chloramphenicol, and in some cases, vancomycin. For these drugs, there is evidence of a relationship between serum concentration, efficacy, and/or the incidence of adverse or toxic events. Monitoring begins with the appropriate timing of collection and continues through the analytical process to the integration of all data used to guide the clinician’s next decision.

Quantitation of vancomycin and its crystalline degradation product (CDP-1) in human serum by high performance liquid chromatography

The delayed clearance of vancomycin results in accumulation of vancomycin crystalline degradation product, CDP-1, in the bodies of renally impaired patients. The 2 isomers, CDP-1-M (major) and CDP-1-m (minor), of CDP-1 are antibiotically inactive but cross-react with some immunoassays that use polyclonal antibodies resulting in falsely elevated results. A high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed to quantitate vancomycin and CDP-1 in the serum of renal patients. After solid phase extraction of 200 microliters serum, the separation of vancomycin, the 2 isomers of CDP-1 and the internal standard (cefazolin) was accomplished by gradient HPLC on a reversed phase C18 column with detection at 210 nm. Linearity was established from 1 to 25 and 25 to 100 micrograms ml-1 vancomycin and 1 to 25 micrograms ml-1 CDP-1. Coefficients of variation for vancomycin and CDP-1 were 3.3-8.6% (n = 10) and 2.8-5.2% (n = 8).

New modified fluorescence polarization immunoassay does not falsely elevate vancomycin concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease

Recent literature has urged caution in the interpretation of vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), because falsely elevated levels in excess of 70% have been reported with the most commonly used fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a recently modified FPIA assay for use in patients with ESRD, in comparison to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and an enzyme-mediated immunoassay technique (EMIT). Serum vancomycin samples were prospectively collected from adults with ESRD undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Each sample was stored at -70 degrees C until analyzed in duplicate by FPIA, EMIT, and HPLC. In an in vitro experiment, blank serum samples with 15 microg/ml vancomycin were spiked with increasing amounts of CDP and analyzed in duplicate with the modified FPIA assay. When compared to HPLC, no statistically significant difference was found in patients with ESRD with the use of the modified FPIA assay (mean concentrations, HPLC 14.92 microg/ml, FPIA 15.96 microg/ml), with FPIA exhibiting a positive bias of 0.64 microg/ml and a precision of +/-3.49 microg/ml (n = 18, p = 0.44). The mean EMIT concentration was 18.34 microg/ml, with a positive bias of 3.43 microg/ml and a precision of +/-5.17 microg/ml (p < 0.01). The addition of increasing amounts of CDP to vancomycin in vitro resulted in concentrations similar to those expected in the absence of significant cross-reactivity with the modified FPIA assay. The modified FPIA assay is a satisfactory tool for monitoring vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Results obtained with EMIT were not as precise as with FPIA.

Urea kinetics and dialysis treatment time predict vancomycin elimination during high-flux hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis sessions with high-flux filters ask for a reconsideration of the kinetics of xenobiotics. The aim of this study was to analyze whether individual high-flux hemodialysis treatment parameters are of predictive value for dosing guidelines, with use of vancomycin as a model compound.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis were studied prospectively. After an intravenous infusion of 1000 mg or 500 mg vancomycin, respectively, six to eight blood samples were collected within a period of 5 to 9 days, including one hemodialysis session. Serum vancomycin concentrations were measured by HPLC. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) was used to fit a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model to the data of 20 patients; the data of the remaining six patients (group II) were used for a prospective evaluation of the model.

RESULTS

A linear relationship was found between vancomycin filter clearance (CLDV) and urea filter clearance (CLDBUN), derived from Kt/V (the product of urea clearance [K] and dialysis treatment time [t], standardized for the urea volume of distribution [V]). Mean (coefficient of variation) steady-state volume of distribution was 1.05 L/kg (22%), CLDV was 0.336.CLDBUN (13%), and residual interdialytic clearance was 2.25 ml/min (90%) in patients with creatinine clearance values (CLCR) below 2 ml/min and 2.25 ml/min + 0.59.CLCR (32%) in patients with CLCR values above 2 ml/min. The model predicted predialysis vancomycin concentrations before the first and the second postinfusion dialysis session in the six patients of group II, with a deviation of 1.8 +/- 1.0 mg/L and 0.8 +/- 0.5 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The described population pharmacokinetic model allows individualization of vancomycin dosing intervals in patients receiving hemodialysis, based on patient characteristics and urea kinetic modeling.

Dosage recommendation of vancomycin during haemodialysis with highly permeable membranes

The standard dosage of vancomycin in haemodialysis patients is usually 1 gram, once a week. The aim of our study was to investigate vancomycin clearance by two highly permeable membranes and to determine whether dosage adjustment is necessary in regular haemodialysis settings when using these type of dialyzers. 12 patients on regular haemodialysis and treated with vancomycin either prophylactically or therapeutically were prospectively randomised to either dialysis with a polyacrylonitril parallel membrane (AN-69) or a cellulose-acetate hollow fiber membrane. After administering vancomycin to the patient vancomycin plasma levels were measured at different intervals. The vancomycin clearance by the dialyzer was calculated from blood samples taken 1 hour after commencing dialysis. The data were used for pharmacokinetic computer simulation in order to develop a vancomycin dosage regimen for patients on regular haemodialysis with highly permeable membranes. The mean vancomycin dialysis clearance was 46 +/- 5 ml/min and did not differ between the two artificial kidneys. Dialysis clearance of vancomycin was independent of blood flow rate. Together with the dialyzer data a pharmacokinetic profile of each patient was calculated from the plasma samples. The average non-renal clearance was 3.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 while renal vancomycin clearance, as a fraction of creatinine clearance, was found to be 0.83 +/- 0.20. The computer calculations predicted that, irrespective of residual renal function, in most patients on regular haemodialysis and treated with these type of artificial kidneys, therapeutic and non-toxic vancomycin levels could be obtained by giving 1000 mg of vancomycin intravenously as a loading dosage and 500 mg during every subsequent dialysis.

Vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with renal dysfunction: a comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique

A study was conducted to determine whether assay-specific quantitative differences exist in the determination of vancomycin serum concentrations obtained from patients with renal dysfunction. Vancomycin serum concentrations were obtained during the first week of therapy for each of three time intervals: 48-96 h, 96-144 h, and 144-192 h after administration of the first dose of vancomycin. Vancomycin serum concentrations were measured using the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). Twenty patients with an estimated creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min who were receiving intravenous vancomycin were evaluated. Hemodialysis was required in 16 of 20 patients. Fifty samples were included in the data analysis. The mean (+/-SD) serum concentrations obtained with EMIT and FPIA were 10.9 mg/L (+/-5.3) and 12.6 mg/L (+/-5.7), respectively (p = 0.13), and were not statistically different. A linear relationship was observed between EMIT and FPIA (EMIT = 0.89 x FPIA - 0.24; r2 = 0.93). No statistically significant differences were observed in the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters between methods. FPIA and EMIT are comparable methods in determining vancomycin serum concentrations within the first week of vancomycin therapy in patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction.

Use of vancomycin in high-flux hemodialysis: experience with 130 courses of therapy

Vancomycin is often administered to hemodialysis patients at long dosage intervals because its removal by hemodialysis is considered to be negligible. We and others, however, have demonstrated significant removal of vancomycin by high-flux hemodialysis. This report describes our experience with 89 courses of vancomycin using a revised regimen with a loading dose followed by 500 mg doses after each dialysis treatment, and compares results with 41 courses using single weekly dosing. All patients were dialyzed with high-flux membranes using volumetric ultrafiltration and bicarbonate dialysate. Serum vancomycin levels were obtained two hours after completion of infusion (peak) and immediately prior to dialysis (trough) and were measured by Abbot TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Duration of multiple-dose therapy was 11 +/- 8 days, with mean total dose 3.6 +/- 1.8 g. Initial doses of 20 mg/kg rapidly and reliably established therapeutic pre-dialysis serum levels (10 to 25 micrograms/ml). In patients treated with multiple dosing 431 pre-dialysis levels were obtained. The mean level was 15.9 +/- 5.7 micrograms/ml; 55 levels (13%) were less than 10 micrograms/ml and 22 (5%) were above 25 micrograms/ml. In patients treated once weekly, 77% of levels were below 10 micrograms/ml by five days after administration, and 84% at one week. No patient developed demonstrable ototoxicity. Twenty-five patients were treated for > or = two weeks, five for > or = four weeks, and two for > five weeks, with no evidence of toxic accumulation. Mean peak level was 20.1 +/- 4.6 micrograms/ml, with a mean difference from preceding pre-dialysis level of 7.2 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml. We conclude that in high-flux hemodialysis, a 20 mg/kg loading dose of vancomycin followed by 500 mg doses after each dialysis treatment achieves predictable, adequate and safe therapeutic levels, does not lead to unacceptably high peaks, and does not accumulate during long treatment courses. By contrast, once-weekly vancomycin dosing resulted in subtherapeutic serum levels after five to seven days, and should be abandoned in the high-flux setting.

Instability of standard calibrators may be involved in overestimating vancomycin concentrations determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) is widely used to determine serum vancomycin concentrations, and it has been shown to over-estimate vancomycin concentrations in sera from renally impaired patients. This phenomenon has generally been thought to result from interference by vancomycin crystalline degradation products (CDP-1). In this study, we confirmed that serum vancomycin concentrations in various patients determined by FPIA were higher than those determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT). However, the quantitative differences in the serum vancomycin concentrations determined by FPIA versus HPLC were higher than the CDP-1 concentrations, even when the cross-reactivity of FPIA to CDP-1 is assumed to be 100%. When the vancomycin calibrators for FPIA were stored at 4 degrees C for 30 days, their concentrations determined by FPIA and HPLC decreased by 14 and 20%, respectively, and CDP-1 corresponding to 20% of primary vancomycin was formed. When stored at 25 degrees C, the degradation of vancomycin was more marked. We concluded that not only the cross-reactivity of FPIA to CDP-1 but also the instability of calibrators may cause the overestimation of serum vancomycin concentrations determined by FPIA.

Falsely elevated serum vancomycin concentrations in hemodialysis patients

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) is the most widely used clinical vancomycin assay in the United States. Questions exist regarding the accuracy of this polyclonal assay in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While several studies have reported discrepancies in vancomycin serum concentrations determined by FPIA compared with other vancomycin assays, no study has investigated the accuracy of vancomycin serum concentrations determined by FPIA in patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Therefore, we compared the assay performance of FPIA and enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) in six subjects with ESRD receiving high-efficiency hemodialysis. Subjects underwent 6 consecutive weeks of hemodialysis treatment with a cellulose acetate dialyzer (CA210) and received 1 g vancomycin intravenously once weekly during the last hour of dialysis. Vancomycin serum concentrations were determined by both EMIT and FPIA methodologies. From the serum concentration results of both assays, vancomycin dosing recommendations were calculated to achieve a desired steady-state peak concentration of 35 mg/L and trough concentration of 10 mg/L. Overall, vancomycin serum concentrations reported by FPIA were significantly higher than those reported by EMIT. The mean difference between assays in the peak serum concentrations at weeks 1, 4, and 6 was 7.5, 11.5, and 11.2 mg/L, respectively. The mean difference in trough serum concentrations at weeks 1, 4, and 6 was 4.2, 6.2, and 5.2 mg/L, respectively. The FPIA overestimation of the EMIT values (calculated as FPIA-EMIT) varied widely among study subjects with a range of 0.0 mg/L to 27.0 mg/L for peak serum concentrations and 0.0 mg/L to 12.8 mg/L for trough serum concentrations. The mean doses calculated based on FPIA results were significantly lower than the EMIT-derived doses. No significant difference was observed in the calculated dosing intervals. These results demonstrate that FPIA significantly overestimates vancomycin serum concentrations compared with EMIT in patients with ESRD undergoing high-efficiency hemodialysis. The overestimation by FPIA may result in significantly different vancomycin dosing recommendations, leading to underdosing and the potential for therapeutic failures. Due to the unpredictability of the overestimation by FPIA, we were unable to formulate vancomycin dosing guidelines for institutions that use FPIA. Therefore, we recommend that the EMIT vancomycin assay be used in patients with ESRD to ensure appropriate dosing.

Stability of vancomycin in plastic syringes measured by high-performance liquid chromatography

The shelf-life of vancomycin in infusion fluids was studied using high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods. Vancomycin was stable (loss in potency less than 10%) for 47 days and 29 days, respectively, when dissolved in water-for-injections BP at 25 degrees C and stored in plastic syringes (Becton Dickinson Plastipak (three-piece) and B. Braun Medical Injekt (two-piece)). In sodium chloride solution (0.9%; pH 5.4) it was stable for 62 and 34 days, while in dextrose solution (5%; pH 4.2) it was stable for 55 and 33 days, respectively, at the same temperature. At 4 degrees C vancomycin was stable in all three infusion fluids and both types of syringe for at least 84 days.

Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the analysis of vancomycin in patients with chronic renal failure

Eighty-two plasma samples from patients with chronic renal failure undergoing vancomycin treatment and hemodialysis (HD) were analyzed with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Vancomycin was infused once and the samples were collected during three subsequent HD sessions at 2 h, 3 days and 5 days post-infusion. The HPLC method, modified from an earlier assay, was simple. There was a wide variation in the estimated concentration between the two assay methods. The results obtained by HPLC were 69% lower than those obtained by FPIA. This difference in vancomycin concentration was independent of the sampling time after vancomycin infusion. HPLC analysis commenced approximately 1.5 year after that of FPIA. To study the effect of in vitro degradation, the vancomycin concentration in ten of the samples was redetermined with FPIA during HPLC analysis. The concentrations of those samples decreased to 78-98% (average 92%) of the original concentration. Because FPIA appears to lack specificity, there is a need of other methods such as HPLC for vancomycin measurements, particularly in samples from patients with end-stage renal failure.

Stability of ceftazidime and vancomycin alone and in combination in heparinized and nonheparinized peritoneal dialysis solution

OBJECTIVE

To examine the stability of ceftazidime, vancomycin, and heparin, alone and in combination, in dialysis solution over six days at three temperatures.

DESIGN

Nine 250-mL Dianeal PD-2 dextrose 1.5% bags were prepared with ceftazidime, vancomycin, and heparin alone and in combination at set concentrations of 100 micrograms/mL, 50 micrograms/mL, and 1 unit/mL, respectively. Three bags of each mixture were stored at 4, 25, and 37 degrees C. Duplicate samples for analysis were removed from each bag at the following time points: premix, 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Each sample was examined visually for signs of cloudiness and precipitation. Each sample was analyzed by stability-indicating HPLC assay for ceftazidime and vancomycin, with stability defined as less than 10 percent degradation of drug over time.

RESULTS

No color change or precipitation was observed in any bag. Vancomycin with or without heparin was stable for 5-6 days at 4, 25, and 37 degrees C. Ceftazidime with and without heparin was stable for 6 days at 4 degrees C, 4 days at 25 degrees C, and less than 12 hours at 37 degrees C. Vancomycin plus ceftazidime with and without heparin was stable for 6 days at 4 degrees C and 25 degrees C, and 4-5 days at 37 degrees C. Ceftazidime plus vancomycin with or without heparin was stable for 6 days at 4 degrees C, 2-3 days at 25 degrees C, and 12 hours at 37 degrees C.

CONCLUSIONS

Bulk preparations of ceftazidime and vancomycin, alone and in combination and with or without heparin in Dianeal PD dextrose 1.5% solution, are sufficiently stable for use up to 6 days under refrigeration or 48 hours at room temperature.

Simplified dosing and monitoring of vancomycin for the burn care clinician

Vancomycin has excellent activity against Gram-positive bacteria and is often selected for use in the infected burn patient. Because of multiple-compartment pharmacokinetics, vancomycin serum concentrations can decrease dramatically in a short time period following the end of an intravenous infusion. This accounts for the widely divergent recommendations for serum vancomycin peak concentrations, e.g. from 15 mg/l up to 80 mg/l, when the time for blood sampling following the end of intravenous infusion is different. It is in general not necessary to monitor vancomycin peak concentrations, not only because its toxic potential is overrated but also because potential toxicity and therapeutic efficacy are correlated with trough concentrations. Post-distribution 'peak' concentrations are generally only useful for determining the optimal dosing interval for patients with impaired renal function. A dosing and monitoring paradigm for vancomycin therapy in burned adults has been devised for burn care clinicians. It provides suggested dose and dosing intervals based on body weight and creatinine clearance, with specific recommendations for regimen modification based upon the results of trough serum concentration determinations.

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in burn patients and intravenous drug abusers

The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin were evaluated in 34 patients (10 burn patients, 14 intravenous drug abusers [IVDA], and 10 controls). Multiple serum samples were drawn following a 1-h vancomycin infusion at steady state over an 8- to 12-h dosing interval. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis. There were no significant differences among the groups with respect to age, weight, serum creatinine, volume of distribution, or protein binding. Burn patients had a significantly higher creatinine clearance than did IVDA or controls. Vancomycin clearances averaged 142.8, 98.0, and 67.7 ml/min in burn patients, IVDA, and controls, respectively. The renal clearance of vancomycin was also higher in burn patients than in the other groups. IVDA tended to have a higher vancomycin clearance (31% higher) than did controls, but the difference was not statistically significant. Vancomycin clearance was much higher in burn patients requiring dosage individualization and close monitoring. A considerable amount of vancomycin was eliminated through renal tubular secretion, making dosage predictions based on creatinine clearance more difficult. Further work with IVDA will be needed to determine if they represent a group requiring aggressive vancomycin dosages.