Response of chemostat cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to carbapenems and other beta-lactams

Virtual screening of AmpC/β-lactamase as target for antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

AmpC is a group I, class C ‐lactamase present in most Enterobacteriaceae and in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli. The β‐lactam class of antibiotics is one of the most important structural classes of antibacterial compounds and act by inhibiting the bacterial D ,D - transpeptidases that are responsible for the final step of peptidoglycan cross-linking. Our main aim in the study is to screen possible inhibitors against AmpC / β ‐ lactamase (an enzyme responsible for antimicrobial activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), through virtual screening of 1364 NCI (National Cancer Institute) diversity set II compounds. Homology Model of AmpC / β ‐ lactamase was constructed using MODELLER and the Model was validated using PROCHECK and Verify 3D programs to obtain a stable structure, which was further used for virtual screening of NCI (National Cancer Institute) diversity set II compounds through molecular Docking studies using Autodock. The amino acid sequence of the β ‐ lactamase was also subjected to ScanProsite web server to find any pattern present in the sequence. After the prediction of 3-dimensional model of AmpC/ β‐lactamase, the possible Active sites ofβ ‐ lactamase were determined using LIGSITE^csc and CastP web servers simultaneously. The Docked complexes were validated and Enumerated based on the Autodock Scoring function to pick out the best inhibitor based on Autodock energy score. Thus from the entire 1364 NCI diversity set II compounds which were Docked, the best four docking solutions were selected (ZINC12670903, ZINC17465965, ZINC11681166 and ZINC13099024). Further the Complexes were analyzed through LIGPLOT for their interaction for the 4 best docked NCI diversity set II compounds. Thus from the Complex scoring and binding ability it is deciphered that these NCI diversity set II compounds could be promising inhibitors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa using AmpC /β ‐ lactamase as Drug target yet pharmacological studies have to confirm it.

Molecular mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance mediated by AmpC hyperproduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains

The molecular mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance mediated by AmpC hyperproduction in natural strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were investigated in a collection of 10 isogenic, ceftazidime-susceptible and -resistant pairs of isolates, each sequentially recovered from a different intensive care unit patient treated with beta-lactams. All 10 ceftazidime-resistant mutants hyper-produced AmpC (beta-lactamase activities were 12- to 657-fold higher than those of the parent strains), but none of them harbored mutations in ampR or the ampC-ampR intergenic region. On the other hand, six of them harbored inactivating mutations in ampD: four contained frameshift mutations, one had a C-->T mutation, creating a premature stop codon, and finally, one had a large deletion, including the complete ampDE region. Complementation studies revealed that only three of the six ampD mutants could be fully trans-complemented with either ampD- or ampDE-harboring plasmids, whereas one of them could be trans-complemented only with ampDE and two of them (including the mutant with the deletion of the ampDE region and one with an ampD frameshift mutation leading to an ampDE-fused open reading frame) could not be fully trans-complemented with any of the plasmids. Finally, one of the four mutants with no mutations in ampD could be trans-complemented, but only with ampDE. Although the inactivation of AmpD is found to be the most frequent mechanism of AmpC hyperproduction in clinical strains, our findings suggest that for certain types of mutations, AmpE plays an indirect role in resistance and that there are other unknown genes involved in AmpC hyperproduction, with at least one of them apparently located close to the ampDE operon.

Empiric carbapenem monotherapy in pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To determine which carbapenem (imipenem/cilastatin or meropenem) was the preferable empiric antibiotic monotherapy in pre-engrafted pediatric bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients in terms of patient tolerance, therapeutic efficacy, and cost.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 16 pediatric BMT patients who received meropenem, and retrospectively analyzed 16 matched patients who had received imipenem/cilastatin for BMT procedures during the prior 2-year period. We evaluated the patients for evidence of bacterial infection, necessity for concurrent antibiotics, vomiting episodes, duration of concurrent total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and cost of therapy.

RESULTS

We found no differences in the number of culture proven or clinically suspected breakthrough bacterial infections or the need for concurrent additional antibiotics between the groups. Our analysis found that patients who received meropenem experienced significantly less vomiting than those in the imipenem/cilastatin cohort. Our data showed both direct and indirect cost savings for the meropenem group. The statistical and clinical differences in the number of vomiting episodes between these groups impacted other aspects of patient care, antiemetic use, and TPN duration.

CONCLUSIONS

By switching to meropenem, we reduced the cost of antiemetic therapy per patient treatment course, and also showed a trend toward reduced duration of TPN. We found that meropenem provided both clinical and fiscal advantages over imipenem/cilastatin as empiric antibiotic monotherapy in neutropenic pediatric BMT patients.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients. Swedish study group

To determine the impact of neutropenia on the pharmacokinetics of meropenem, 14 patients with fever and neutropenia were given 1 g of meropenem i.v. every 8 h as an infusion over 30 min. The volume of distribution (16.2 l/1.73 m2) and the nonrenal clearance [75 ml/(min x 1.73 m2)] in this group were significantly increased compared to healthy subjects studied previously with identical techniques. The kinetic study was repeated when the patients had a normal temperature and a raised neutrophil count; most kinetic variables did not differ from the findings on the first day of treatment. The pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients differs from earlier findings in healthy subjects. Considering these data and known minimum inhibitory concentration values for common pathogens, meropenem administered every 6 to 8 h seems an appropriate regimen in patients with febrile neutropenia. The shorter time interval may be used for treatment of Pseudomonas infection.

Pharmacodynamic effects of meropenem on gram-negative bacteria

The in vitro initial killing and post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of meropenem on five gram-negative reference strains were evaluated by bioluminescence assay of bacterial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and viable count. Morphology studies were performed in parallel. Meropenem showed concentration-dependent long (2-5 h) PAEs on Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens when assayed by bioluminescence and induced spheroplasts at almost all concentrations. The bioluminescence PAEs reached a maximum response at 4 x MIC. These PAEs of meropenem on Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens were longer than corresponding PAEs of imipenem shown in previous studies. The higher affinity of meropenem than imipenem for PBP 3 might explain the longer PAEs obtained with meropenem. However, there was only a very short PAE, no PAE or even a negative PAE when viable count was used as the initial value for the PAE calculation. A strong initial decrease in viability but a less pronounced change in intracellular ATP was registered. Since this initial change in cell numbers is the initial value for the PAE calculation, the length of PAE was highly method dependent. In summary, a strong initial killing and no PAE were shown using viable count as the initial value for the PAE calculation, but a weak initial killing and long PAEs were shown when bioluminescence was used throughout the experiments.

Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Combining tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, with the ureidopenicillin, piperacillin, successfully restores the activity of piperacillin against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Tazobactam has inhibitory activity, and therefore protects piperacillin against Richmond and Sykes types II, III, IV and V beta-lactamases, staphylococcal penicillinase and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. However, tazobactam has only species-specific activity against class I chromosomally-mediated enzymes. Resistant organisms include some Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Xanthomonas maltophilia and Enterococcus faecium. Consistent with its in vitro activity, preliminary clinical data indicate that the fixed combination of piperacillin/tazobactam (dose ratio 8:1) is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe polymicrobial infections, including intra-abdominal, skin and soft-tissue and lower respiratory tract infections. In limited comparative trials, piperacillin/tazobactam demonstrated equivalent or better efficacy than standard comparator regimens in these infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with an aminoglycoside was effective in the empirical treatment of fever in patients with neutropenia and compared favourably with ceftazidime in combination with an aminoglycoside, although second-line therapy with a glycopeptide antibiotic may be indicated in unresponsive episodes. Data from phase III trials indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam has a tolerability profile typical of a penicillin agent. Piperacillin/tazobactam provides a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity in a convenient single formulation suitable for use in the treatment of polymicrobial infections. Possible limitations concern its restricted activity against class I beta-lactamases, enzymes that are becoming increasingly important in the nosocomial environment. Combined therapy with an aminoglycoside may be necessary in more serious infections.

A comparison of the in vitro postantibiotic effect of meropenem and imipenem versus selected enterobacteriaceae and other pathogens

The in vitro postantibiotic effect (PAE) of meropenem (Merrem or SM-7338) and imipenem was determined by using 12 strains of clinically important pathogens. A PAE of > or = 1/2 h duration was observed more frequently with strains tested against meropenem than with imipenem.

Bactericidal effects of antibiotics on slowly growing and nongrowing bacteria

Antimicrobial agents are most often tested against bacteria in the log phase of multiplication to produce the maximum bactericidal effect. In an infection, bacteria may multiply less optimally. We examined the effects of several classes of antimicrobial agents to determine their actions on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria during nongrowing and slowly growing phases. Only ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin exhibited bactericidal activity against nongrowing gram-negative bacteria, and no antibiotics were bactericidal (3-order-of-magnitude killing) against Staphylococcus aureus. For the very slowly growing gram-negative bacteria studied, gentamicin (an aminoglycoside), imipenem (a carbapenem), meropenem (a carbapenem), ciprofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone), and ofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone) exhibited up to 5.7 orders of magnitude more killing than piperacillin or cefotaxime. This is in contrast to optimally growing bacteria, in which a wide variety of antibiotic classes produced 99.9% killing. For the gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria we examined, antibiotic killing was greatly dependent on the growth rate. The clinical implications of slow killing by chemotherapeutic agents for established bacterial infections and infections involving foreign bodies are unknown.