Comparative in-vitro activities of RP59500 (quinupristin/dalfopristin), CL 329,998, CL 331,002, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, teicoplanin and vancomycin against Gram-positive bacteria

Quinupristin/Dalfopristin

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary® Monograph Service receive five to six researched monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. The monographs are published in printed form and on diskettes that allow customization. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board called The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The February 2000 Formulary monographs are on gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, levetiracetam, aspirin/extended-release dipyridamole, and aminolevulinic acid HCl. The DUE is on gatifloxacin.

Approved Glycopeptide Antibacterial Drugs: Mechanism of Action and Resistance

The glycopeptide antimicrobials are a group of natural product and semisynthetic glycosylated peptides that show antibacterial activity against Gram-positive organisms through inhibition of cell-wall synthesis. This is achieved primarily through binding to the d-alanyl-d-alanine terminus of the lipid II bacterial cell-wall precursor, preventing cross-linking of the peptidoglycan layer. Vancomycin is the foundational member of the class, showing both clinical longevity and a still preferential role in the therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and of susceptible Enterococcus spp. Newer lipoglycopeptide derivatives (telavancin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin) were designed in a targeted fashion to increase antibacterial activity, in some cases through secondary mechanisms of action. Resistance to the glycopeptides emerged in delayed fashion and occurs via a spectrum of chromosome- and plasmid-associated elements that lead to structural alteration of the bacterial cell-wall precursor substrates.

Implant infections due to enterococci: role of capsular polysaccharides and biofilm

Enterococci are natural inhabitants of the gastrointestinal tract and of the female genital tract of humans and many animals. In recent years, enterococci have been increasingly recognized as important human pathogens causing infections associated with medical devices. Their resistance to most antimicrobial agents and their ability to form biofilm has contributed to the increasing incidence of nosocomial enterococcal infections. Enterococci possess a capsular polysaccharide composed of a glycerol-teichoic acid-like molecule consisting of repeating units of 6-alfa-D-glucose-1-2-glycerol-3-PO4 , substituted on carbon 2 with a alfa-2,1-linked molecule of glucose. Using both immunologic and genetic data E. faecalis can be assigned to specific serotypes based on capsular polysaccharides. Clinical examples of foreign-body infections due to enterococci are described, comprising infections of artificial joints, implanted intravascular catheters, artificial hearts and artificial valves, stents, liquor shunt devices, and intraocular infections. Methods to prevent and/or treat enterococcal infections are presented.

The glycylcyclines: a comparative review with the tetracyclines

The tetracycline class of antimicrobials exhibit a broad-spectrum of activity against numerous pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as atypical organisms. These compounds are bacteriostatic, and act by binding to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit and inhibiting protein synthesis. The tetracyclines have been used successfully for the treatment of a variety of infectious diseases including community-acquired respiratory tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases, as well in the management of acne. The use of tetracyclines for treating bacterial infections has been limited in recent years because of the emergence of resistant organisms with efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms of resistance. Research to find tetracycline analogues that circumvented these resistance mechanisms has lead to the development of the glycylcyclines. The most developed glycylcycline is the 9-tert-butyl-glycylamido derivative of minocycline, otherwise known as tigecycline (GAR-936). The glycylcyclines exhibit antibacterial activities typical of earlier tetracyclines, but with more potent activity against tetracycline-resistant organisms with efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms of resistance. The glycylcyclines are active against other resistant pathogens including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Tigecycline is only available in an injectable formulation for clinical use unlike currently marketed tetracyclines that are available in oral dosage forms. Tigecycline has a significantly larger volume of distribution (> 10 L/kg) than the other tetracyclines (range of 0.14 to 1.6 L/kg). Protein binding is approximately 68%. Presently no human data are available describing the tissue penetration of tigecycline, although studies in rats using radiolabelled tigecycline demonstrated good penetration into tissues. Tigecycline has a half-life of 36 hours in humans, less than 15% of tigecycline is excreted unchanged in the urine. On the basis of available data, it does not appear that the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline are markedly influenced by patient gender or age. The pharmacodynamic parameter that best correlates with bacteriological eradication is time above minimum inhibitory concentration. Several animal studies have been published describing the efficacy of tigecycline. Human phase 1 and 2 clinical trials have been completed for tigecycline. Phase 2 studies have been conducted in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections, and in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections have been published as abstracts. Both studies concluded that tigecycline was efficacious and well tolerated. Few human data are available regarding the adverse effects or drug interactions resulting from tigecycline therapy; however, preliminary data report that tigecycline can be safely used, is well tolerated and that the adverse effects experienced were typical of the tetracyclines (i.e. nausea, vomiting and headache). Tigecycline appears to be a promising new antibacterial based on in vitro and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic activity; however more clinical data are needed to fully evaluate its potential.

Role of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of Gram-positive nosocomial infections in haematological or oncological patients

Gram-positive pathogens, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and enterococci, are now the predominant causes of infection in neutropenic haematology/oncology patients, but are often resistant to multiple antibiotics. Glycopeptides have been the only alternative antibiotic treatments for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections to date. However, glycopeptides are not always effective or well tolerated, and can produce nephrotoxic or ototoxic effects. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a recently introduced streptogramin antibiotic that is active in vitro against most of the major Gram-positive pathogens causing infection in neutropenic patients. Recent studies of the in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Gram-positive pathogens to quinupristin/dalfopristin are summarized. Pre-clinical and clinical studies of the efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections are reviewed. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is active in vitro against the vast majority of recent isolates of relevant Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, but excluding Enterococcus faecalis. Pre-clinical and clinical data indicate the efficacy of quinupristin/dalfopristin in infections caused by these organisms, including bacteraemia and catheter-related infections. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is not associated with nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a potential alternative to glycopeptides in haematology or oncology patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections, especially those who are unresponsive to, or intolerant of, glycopeptides.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin

Gram-positive pathogens are associated with both community- and hospital-acquired infections. These infections may be life-threatening in hospitalised patients, especially in those with significant underlying acute or chronic diseases. Prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is essential for avoiding morbidity and mortality. The concept of appropriate therapy is being redefined by increasing antimicrobial resistance, especially amongst Gram-positive pathogens. This has been most dramatic with penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the community, including cross-resistance to other classes of antimicrobial agents. In the US, the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with community isolates is significant. For hospital-acquired Gram-positive pathogens, MRSA, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species and vancomycin-intermediate resistant and -resistant S. aureus are a great concern, particularly as the frequency of recovery of these pathogens from infected patients increases. The net result of these various resistance issues is a reduction in the number of appropriate antimicrobial agents for treating infected patients. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a parental streptogramin with a spectrum of activity that includes Gram-positive pathogens, including those resistant to other classes of antimicrobial compounds. In this review, data summarising the frequency of recovered Gram-positive pathogens from various infectious diseases, the escalating prevalence of resistance amongst Gram-positive pathogens and the factors making quinupristin/dalfopristin a suitable agent for treating patients infected with Gram-positive organisms will be discussed.

New developments in tetracycline antibiotics: glycylcyclines and tetracycline efflux pump inhibitors

The tetracyclines, discovered in the 1940s, are a well-established class of antibiotics that still have a role in treating microbial infections in man. However, the widespread emergence of bacterial resistance due to efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms has severely limited their effectiveness. A new generation of tetracyclines, the glycylcyclines, has been developed to overcome resistance to earlier tetracyclines. One of the new glycylcyclines, 9-t-butylglyclamido-minocycline (GAR-936, tigecycline) is currently undergoing clinical trials. This review considers the current status of glycylcyclines and the possibility that resistance to these agents might arise in the future. Other approaches are also being taken to address the emergence of resistance to tetracyclines. Recently, a number of tetracycline efflux pump inhibitors have been discovered that might be used in combination with earlier tetracyclines to restore their activity against resistant organisms. However, the development of tetracycline efflux pump inhibitors is complicated by the occurrence of several efflux pump sub-families and by the presence of both efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms in the same organism, especially in naturally occurring, Gram-positive clinical isolates.

Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance

Tetracyclines were discovered in the 1940s and exhibited activity against a wide range of microorganisms including gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, chlamydiae, mycoplasmas, rickettsiae, and protozoan parasites. They are inexpensive antibiotics, which have been used extensively in the prophlylaxis and therapy of human and animal infections and also at subtherapeutic levels in animal feed as growth promoters. The first tetracycline-resistant bacterium, Shigella dysenteriae, was isolated in 1953. Tetracycline resistance now occurs in an increasing number of pathogenic, opportunistic, and commensal bacteria. The presence of tetracycline-resistant pathogens limits the use of these agents in treatment of disease. Tetracycline resistance is often due to the acquisition of new genes, which code for energy-dependent efflux of tetracyclines or for a protein that protects bacterial ribosomes from the action of tetracyclines. Many of these genes are associated with mobile plasmids or transposons and can be distinguished from each other using molecular methods including DNA-DNA hybridization with oligonucleotide probes and DNA sequencing. A limited number of bacteria acquire resistance by mutations, which alter the permeability of the outer membrane porins and/or lipopolysaccharides in the outer membrane, change the regulation of innate efflux systems, or alter the 16S rRNA. New tetracycline derivatives are being examined, although their role in treatment is not clear. Changing the use of tetracyclines in human and animal health as well as in food production is needed if we are to continue to use this class of broad-spectrum antimicrobials through the present century.

Clinafloxacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam in treatment of patients with severe skin and soft tissue infections

Patients (n = 409) with severe skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were randomized to receive clinafloxacin or piperacillin-tazobactam (plus optional vancomycin for methicillin-resistant cocci), administered intravenously, with the option to switch to oral medication. Most patients had cellulitis, wound infections, or diabetic foot infections. Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common baseline pathogens. Fewer baseline pathogens were resistant to clinafloxacin (1.8%) than to piperacillin-tazobactam (6.2%) (P = 0.001). The clinafloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam groups did not differ significantly in clinical cure rates (68.8 and 65.2%, respectively) or microbiologic eradication rates (61.5 and 57.2%). Clinafloxacin yielded higher eradication rates for all three of the most common pathogenic species, although no differences were statistically significant. Within the power of this study, the overall frequency of adverse events was similar (P = 0.577) in the two treatment groups. Drug-associated adverse events (P = 0.050) and treatment discontinuations (P = 0.052) were marginally more frequent in the clinafloxacin group, primarily due to phototoxicity in outpatients receiving clinafloxacin. Although most cases of phototoxicity were mild to moderate, four cases were reported as severe. In summary, clinafloxacin monotherapy was equivalent in effectiveness to therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam plus optional vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe SSTIs.

Antistaphylococcal (MSSA, MRSA, MSSE, MRSE) antibiotics

S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci such as S. epidermidis are important causes of infection of the bloodstream, cardiac valves, implanted devices, and skin, with repercussions on mortality and increased economic costs. Treatment of staphylococcal infections is made difficult by the increasing emergence of resistance to beta-lactams and other antimicrobials, including reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. Penicillin must be used for infrequent penicillin-susceptible isolates, oxacillin and nafcillin are to be considered the major option for penicillin-resistant staphylococci, and glycopeptides are the drugs of choice for infections caused by methicillin-resistant strains. Co-trimoxazole, lincosamides, macrolides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones are alternative agents, primarily in subjects allergic to beta-lactams. Newly introduced or experimental drugs, such as streptogramins (quinupristin-dalfopristin), oxazolidinones (linezolid), carbapenems (LY 333328), everninomicins (SCH 27899), and derivatives of tetracyclines (glycylcyclines), could be useful for therapy of infections caused by multiresistant staphylococci.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections

Quinupristin/dalfopristin is the first parenteral streptogramin antibacterial agent, and is a 30:70 (w/w) ratio of 2 semisynthetic pristinamycin derivatives. The combination has inhibitory activity against a broad range of gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, other streptococci, Clostridium perfringens and Peptostreptococcus spp. The combination also has good activity against selected gram-negative respiratory tract pathogens including Moraxella catarrhalis, Legioniella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Quinupristin/dalfopristin has poor activity against E. faecalis. The combination is bactericidal against staphylococci and streptococci, although constitutive erythromycin resistance can affect its activity. As for many other agents, quinupristin/dalfopristin is generally bacteriostatic against E. faecium. In patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or VREF infections participating in prospective emergency-use trials, quinupristin/dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 or 12 hours achieved clinical or bacteriological success in > or =64% of patients. Emergence of resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin was uncommon (4% of patients) in those with VREF infections. Quinupristin/dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg 8- or 12-hourly also achieved similar clinical success rates to comparator agents in patients with presumed gram-positive complicated skin and skin structure infections or nosocomial pneumonia (administered in combination with aztreoman) in 3 large multicentre randomised trials. Systemic adverse events associated with quinupristin/dalfopristin include gastrointestinal events (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea), rash and pruritus. Myalgias and arthralgias also occur at an overall incidence of 1.3%, although higher rates (2.5 to 31%) have been reported in patients with multiple comorbidities. Venous events are common if the drug is administered via a peripheral line; however, several management options (e.g. use of central venous access, increased infusion volume) may help to minimise their occurrence. Hyperbilirubinaemia has been documented in 3.1% of quinupristin/dalfopristin recipients versus 1.3% of recipients of comparator agents. Quinupristin/dalfopristin inhibits cytochrome P450 3A4 and therefore has the potential to increase the plasma concentrations of substrates of this enzyme.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinupristin/dalfopristin, the first parenteral streptogramin, offers a unique spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. In serious gram-positive infections for which there are other treatment options available, the spectrum of activity and efficacy of quinupristin/ dalfopristin should be weighed against its tolerability and drug interaction profile. However, in VREF or unresponsive MRSA infections, where few proven treatment options exist, quinupristin/dalfopristin should be considered as a treatment of choice for these seriously ill patients.

Comparative activity of clinafloxacin and nine other compounds tested against 2000 contemporary clinical isolates from patients in United States hospitals

The in vitro activity of clinafloxacin (formerly CI-960, AM-1091, PD-127391) was compared with other fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, gentamicin, vancomycin, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 2000 recent clinical strains from a large number of hospitals in the United States. Overall, clinafloxacin was the most active compound tested. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, clinafloxacin and ciprofloxacin demonstrated comparable activity (88% and 80% susceptible, respectively), and were four- to 16-fold more potent than levofloxacin (MIC90, 16 micrograms/ml) or trovafloxacin (MIC90, 32 micrograms/ml). Among anaerobic bacteria, clinafloxacin (MIC50s, 0.25-0.5 microgram/ml) and trovafloxacin (MIC50s, 0.5-2.0 micrograms/ml) were the most active quinolones, whereas metronidazole, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most potent comparators. Clinafloxacin demonstrated sustained activity when compared to several available peer drugs against contemporary clinical isolates. The clinafloxacin spectrum against the 15 important pathogens monitored ranged from nil or 4.0% (vancomycin-resistant enterococci) to 100.0% (four different species) susceptible with an average percent susceptibility of 94.0%. This degree of potency and spectrum for clinafloxacin provides a wide potential for use against many species with established resistance to other anti-microbial classes.

In vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against selected bacterial pathogens isolated in Italy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin, a new injectable streptogramin, against 732 clinical strains recently isolated in Italy. METHODS: Susceptibility tests were performed according to NCCLS-guided MIC methodology. Pathogens included in the evaluation included 108 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 124 coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates, 158 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates, 30 Streptococcus agalactiae isolates, 30 b-hemolytic streptococcal isolates, 18 Streptococcus sanguis isolates, 80 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, 69 Enterococcal isolates, 40 Haemophilus influenzae isolates, 30 Moraxella catarrhalis isolates and, finally, 30 Gram-positive and 25 Gram-negative anaerobes. RESULTS: Quinupristin/dalfopristin inhibited Staphylococcus aureus and other Staphylococcus spp., irrespective of their oxacillin or erythromycin resistance phenotypes. Similarly, streptococci were fully inhibited by quinupristin/dalfopristin. Enterococcus faecalis was not included in the spectrum of this streptogramin, while isolates of Enterococcus faecium were inhibited by the new compound. Respiratory pathogens such as H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis were inhibited by quinupristin/dalfopristin as well as all Gram-negative anaerobes tested. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a putative role for quinupristin/dalfopristin in the empirical treatment of severe nosocomial and community-acquired infections caused by pathogens often displaying resistance to multiple antibiotics. This drug may provide an alternative to glycopeptide compounds.

In vitro activity of clinafloxacin against fluoroquinolone resistant Spanish clinical isolates

The in vitro activity of clinafloxacin against 162 ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates was determined. Isolates were selected when their MIC to ciprofloxacin was 2 mg/l (intermediate) or > 2 mg/l (resistant). The following strains were tested: 61 Escherichia coli, 12 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 7 Proteus mirabilis, 21 Serratia marcescens, 4 Enterobacter cloacae, 21 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 21 Staphylococcus. aureus (resistant to methicillin) and 15 Enterococcus spp. Clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and norfloxacin activities were evaluated by agar dilution using Müeller-Hinton agar according to NCCLS recommendations. Of the 162 isolates, 16 (9.8%) were intermediate and 146 (90.1%) resistant to ciprofloxacin. 95 of the 162 strains (58.6%) were susceptible, 27 (16.7%) intermediately susceptible, and 40 strains (24.7%) were resistant to clinafloxacin. The percentage susceptible to clinafloxacin was 65.6% for E. coli, 75% for K. pneumoniae, 71.4% for P. mirabilis, 28.6% for S. marcescens, 75% for E. cloacae, 33.3% for P. aeruginosa, 90.5% for S. aureus and 40% for Enterococcus spp. Clinafloxacin was active against 58.6% of the ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates tested. It was particularly active against S. aureus strains resistant to both ciprofloxacin and methicillin.

The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the literature available on the new fluoroquinolones - clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin - to compare these agents with each other and contrast them with ciprofloxacin, an older fluoroquinolone.

DATA SELECTION

Published papers used were obtained by searching MEDLINE for articles published between 1994 and 1998, inclusive. References of published papers were also obtained and reviewed. Abstracts from scientific proceedings were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Due to the limited data available on several of the agents, criteria for study inclusion in the in vitro, pharmacokinetics and in vivo sections were not restrictive.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The new fluoroquinolones offer excellent Gram-negative bacillary activity and improved Gram-positive activity (eg, against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (eg, Bacteriodes fragilis). All of the new fluoroquinolones have a longer serum half-life than ciprofloxacin (allowing for once daily dosing), and several are eliminated predominantly by nonrenal means. No clinical trials are available comparing the new fluoroquinolones with each other. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones with standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of infections. Their adverse effect profile is similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin cause a high incidence of phototoxicity (1.5% to 14% and 2% to 11.7%, respectively), grepafloxacin causes a high incidence of taste perversion (9% to 17%) and trovafloxacin causes a high incidence of dizziness (11%). They all interact with metal ion-containing drugs (eg, antacids), and clinafloxacin and grepafloxacin interact with theophylline. The new fluoroquinolones are expensive; however, their use may result in savings in situations where, because of their potent and broad spectrum of activity, they can be used orally in place of intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The new fluoroquinolones offer advantages over ciprofloxacin in terms of improved in vitro activity and pharmacokinetics. Whether these advantages translate into improved clinical outcomes is presently unknown. The new fluoroquinolones have the potential to emerge as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of respiratory tract and genitourinary tract infections.

Advances in antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia has a significant impact upon healthcare in North America and worldwide. In the U.S. it is responsible for three to four million cases yearly and 78,000 deaths. It is not a homogeneous entity and it may be caused by a number of pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae, the atypicals (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella species) Haemophilus influenzae and Gram-negative rods. While it is clear that directed therapy is the ideal, empiric therapy is likely to remain the norm for some time to come. This is because of limitations in current diagnostic techniques, the possibility of infection with co-pathogens and the broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity required to treat the various pathogens which may be responsible for infection in any given patient. Of great concern is the increase in the incidence of resistant pathogens seen in community-acquired pneumonia. Of particular significance are the isolates of S. pneumoniae which display resistance to penicillin and macrolides although the exact clinical relevance has yet to be determined. New guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia have been developed by the Infectious Disease Society of America which include the new fluoroquinolones. These agents offer the potential for monotherapy of community-acquired pneumonia in cases which previously required combination regimens such as a macrolide and a beta-lactam. There is great concern however, that these agents not be used inappropriately thereby hastening the emergence of resistance to the fluoroquinolone class of antimicrobials.

Comparative in-vitro activities of moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid against staphylococci

The antistaphylococcal activities of four newly developed antibiotics, moxifloxacin (an 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone), trovafloxacin (a naphthyridone), quinupristin/dalfopristin (a semisynthetic streptogramin) and linezolid (an oxazolidinone), were examined and compared with those of ciprofloxacin, vancomycin and teicoplanin, using an agar dilution method. A total of 245 clinical isolates of staphylococci, including a large number of clonally different methicillin-resistant strains, were tested. The new agents tested exhibited wide-spectrum antistaphylococcal activity against both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains. In contrast to the quinolones, the in-vitro activities of quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid and the glycopeptides remained almost unchanged, irrespective of the resistance phenotype for methicillin. A number of isolates with elevated quinolone MICs were observed.

Trovafloxacin: an overview

Trovafloxacin, a new synthetic naphthyridine fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is a broad-spectrum agent available orally and intravenously. It was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of selected pulmonary, surgical, intraabdominal, gynecologic, pelvic, skin, and urinary tract infections. Its spectrum of activity includes aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative organisms as well as anaerobic pathogens. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, achieves good tissue and cerebrospinal fluid penetration, and has a half-life that allows once-daily dosing. It is hepatically metabolized, and dosage adjustments are necessary for patients with severe hepatic dysfunction but not for those with mild or moderate dysfunction or renal dysfunction. The drug has a favorable safety profile, and a high tendency for transient first-dose dizziness and/or lightheadedness in young women. Similar to other quinolones, trovafloxacin should not be taken with antacids that contain aluminum or magnesium, sucralfate, or ferrous sulfate. Trovafloxacin may prove beneficial as it allows for oral or intravenous monotherapy against indicated infections that normally require multidrug, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage.

Pharmacokinetics of quinupristin-dalfopristin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients

Quinupristin-dalfopristin may be useful for treatment of organisms causing peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, including methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The pharmacokinetic profiles of single intravenous doses of this combination streptogramin antibiotic of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight were characterized for eight noninfected patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Comparison was made to pharmacokinetic profiles determined for eight healthy volunteers matched by age, sex, and race. Drug was measured in dialysate up to 6 h following the dose. Plasma and dialysate were assayed for parent compounds and metabolites. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for maximal concentrations in plasma, times to maximal concentration, areas under the curve, distribution volumes, rates of total body clearance, or half-lives in plasma for quinupristin and dalfopristin. No statistically significant differences were observed in maximal concentrations in plasma, times to maximal concentration, areas under the curve, or half-lives for cysteine, the glutathione conjugates of quinupristin, or the pristinamycin IIA metabolite of dalfopristin. The measurements in dialysate of the parent and most metabolites were below the expected MICs. Dialysis clearance was insignificant. Quinupristin-dalfopristin was well tolerated in both groups, causing only mild adverse events that resolved prior to discharge from the study. The disposition of quinupristin, dalfopristin, or their primary metabolites following a single dose was unaltered in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Intravenous dosing of this antibiotic combination is unlikely to be adequate for the treatment of peritonitis associated with peritoneal dialysis.

Activity of clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and other antimicrobial agents versus Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin

Isolations of Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin are now being reported worldwide. In testing here by broth microdilution according to NCCLS guidelines and applying vancomycin breakpoint criteria (susceptible at 4 micrograms/mL), two of three strains were susceptible (MICs at 4 micrograms/mL) rather than intermediate (MICs at 8 micrograms/mL) as previously reported by other laboratories. Clinafloxacin was more active (MICs/MBCs at 0.5 to 2 micrograms/mL) than ciprofloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Trovafloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and quinupristin/dalfopristin were the next most active agents, although quinupristin/dalfopristin was bactericidal against only two of these three strains. Amikacin, imipenem, oxacillin, and rifampin were less active.

In vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin and newer quinolones combined with gentamicin against resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium

In a study designed to obtain data on compounds active against enterococci, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of quinupristin/dalfopristin (RP 59500) and the novel quinolones DU-6859a, trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin were determined for 122 Enterococcus faecalis and seven Enterococcus faecium isolates. In addition, 15 Enterococcus faecalis isolates resistant to gentamicin, DU-6859a, and trovafloxacin were exposed over time to combinations of DU-6859a plus gentamicin and trovafloxacin plus gentamicin. DU-6859a and trovafloxacin were found to be the most active compounds against Enterococcus faecalis and DU-6859a and RP 59500 against Enterococcus faecium. Synergy between either DU-6859a or trovafloxacin and gentamicin was observed with 27 to 35% of the isolates. It is concluded that DU-6859a and trovafloxacin are very potent against enterococci, especially when combined with gentamicin.

Bacteriological activity of trovafloxacin, a new quinolone, against respiratory tract pathogens

The use of established fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, as empirical therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe respiratory tract infections is limited by their poor activity against gram-positive and atypical pathogens. Data from in vitro susceptibility studies and in vivo animal protection models suggest that the new fluoroquinolone, trovafloxacin, compared with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin offers equivalent activity against gram-negative pathogens and improved activity against gram-positive pathogens. In particular, susceptibility data indicate that trovafloxacin is at least 16-fold more potent than either ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other susceptible pathogens include Streptococcus pyogenes, vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae. In vivo studies involving models of protection against acute systemic infection and pneumococcal pneumonia in mice, and Legionnaires' disease in guinea pigs, indicate that the antibacterial spectrum observed for trovafloxacin in vitro extends to the in vivo setting. Together, these findings suggest that trovafloxacin may offer clinical efficacy against respiratory pathogens superior to that of ciprofloxacin and of ofloxacin, and may find a useful role as empiric therapy in both the community and hospital setting.