Necessity of a loading dose when using vancomycin in critically ill patients

Impact of Limiting Vancomycin Loading Doses in Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Hospital Protocol Revision

Background: Vancomycin loading doses are commonly used to quickly attain target serum concentrations; however, data supporting their effect on clinical patient outcomes is limited. In April 2020, our institution revised our pharmacist-driven vancomycin dosing protocol to reserve loading doses for hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Prior to the protocol update, all patients treated with vancomycin at our institution received a weight-based loading dose. The purpose of this study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety outcomes related to the use of vancomycin loading doses. Methods: A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients treated with vancomycin for laboratory-confirmed MRSA infections. Patients who received vancomycin therapy prior to our institution's vancomycin dosing protocol revisions (pre-intervention) were compared to patients who received vancomycin after the revisions (post-intervention). The primary outcome was all-cause, inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent signs and symptoms of infection ≥5 days after vancomycin initiation, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 122 patients (63 pre-intervention patients and 59 post-intervention patients) were included. Receipt of a vancomycin loading dose did not impact the rate of inpatient mortality (4.76%vs 6.78%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.31, 6.79]). All secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, including persistent signs and symptoms of infection, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Conclusions: Routine use of vancomycin loading doses is not associated with improved outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with MRSA infections.

Vancomycin dosing in high-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

An inverse relationship exists between vancomycin serum concentrations and the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), reflected through the dialysate flow rate (DFR). There remains a lack of evidence to guide initial vancomycin dosing in the setting of high-intensity CRRT (i.e., DFR >30 mL/kg/h). Additionally, recommendations for pharmacokinetic monitoring of vancomycin have transitioned from a trough-based to area under the curve (AUC)-based dosing strategy to optimize efficacy and safety. Therefore, an improved understanding of the impact of CRRT intensity on AUC/MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) has the potential to enhance vancomycin dosing in this patient population.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study is to evaluate current vancomycin dosing strategies and achievement of pharmacokinetic targets in patients on high-intensity CRRT.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult critically ill patients admitted to Houston Methodist Hospital between May 2019 and October 2021 and received vancomycin therapy while on high-intensity CRRT. High-intensity CRRT was defined by a DFR that was both ≥3 L/h and >30 mL/kg/h. Depending on the initial vancomycin dosing strategy, patients were stratified into either the traditional (15 mg/kg/day) or enhanced (≥15 mg/kg/day) dosing group. The primary outcome was the percent of patients who attained steady-state AUC24 /MIC ≥400 mg*h/L at the first obtained vancomycin level in the enhanced group compared with the traditional group.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were included in the final analysis, 56 in the traditional and 69 in the enhanced dosing group. The primary end point occurred in 74% and 54% of patients in the enhanced and traditional dosing groups, respectively (p = 0.029). Therapeutic vancomycin trough levels (10-20 μg/mL) were more commonly achieved in the enhanced dosing group compared with the traditional dosing group (66.7% vs. 45%, p = 0.013). As DFR rose, increasingly higher doses of vancomycin, up to 27 mg/kg/day, were required to achieve the therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the influence of variable CRRT intensities on vancomycin AUC/MIC. Our findings suggest that vancomycin doses of ≥15 mg/kg/day are needed to achieve early therapeutic targets in patients on high-intensity CRRT.

Impact of Vancomycin Loading Doses and Dose Escalation on Glomerular Function and Kidney Injury Biomarkers in a Translational Rat Model

Vancomycin-induced kidney injury is common, and outcomes in humans are well predicted by animal models. This study employed our translational rat model to investigate temporal changes in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and correlations with kidney injury biomarkers related to various vancomycin dosing strategies. First, Sprague-Dawley rats received allometrically scaled loading doses or standard doses. Rats that received a loading dose had low GFRs and increased urinary injury biomarkers (kidney injury molecule 1 [KIM-1] and clusterin) that persisted through day 2 compared to those that did not receive a loading dose. Second, we compared low and high allometrically scaled vancomycin doses to a positive acute kidney injury control of high-dose folic acid. Rats in both the low- and high-dose vancomycin groups had higher GFRs on all dosing days than the positive-control group. When the two vancomycin groups were compared, rats that received the low dose had significantly higher GFRs on days 1, 2, and 4. Compared to low-dose vancomycin, the KIM-1 was elevated among rats in the high-dose group on dosing day 3. The GFR correlated most closely with the urinary injury biomarker KIM-1 on all experimental days. Vancomycin loading doses were associated with significant losses of kidney function and elevations of urinary injury biomarkers. In our translational rat model, both the degree of kidney function decline and urinary biomarker increases corresponded to the magnitude of the vancomycin dose (i.e., a higher dose resulted in worse outcomes).

VANCOmycin dose adjustments comparing trough levels to the ratio of the area under de curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration method using a BAYESian approach: A feasibility study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE?: The latest published guidelines advocate for the area under the concentration-time curve to minimal inhibitory concentration (AUC_0-24h /MIC) estimated with bayesian calculations. This recommended pharmacokinetic monitoring transition is not based on randomized controlled prospective data. METHODS: In this open-label feasibility RCT, patients were assigned to have their vancomycin dosing adjusted based on bayesian-guided AUC_0-24h /MIC or trough levels. Primary outcomes were consent rate, number of patients recruited per month, compliance with blood sampling schedule and compliance with bayesian software recommendations. Secondary outcomes focused on target attainment, safety and operational impacts. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Forty-five patients underwent randomization (23 bayesian, 22 trough). Consent rate was 37,5% for an average of 9.8 patients recruited per month meeting pre-specified objectives of 30% (p = 0.073) and 10 (p = 0.74) respectively. A 74.8% compliance with blood sampling schedule was below the pre-specified objective of 80% (p = 0.038). There was no statistically significant difference between the 83.7% compliance with bayesian software recommendations and the pre-specified objective of 90% (p = 0.21). Although exploratory, key clinical results were significant increases in the bayesian group for proportion of levels at target (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.01-1.72; P = 0.038), number of blood samplings for patients (p = 0.036) and pharmacists' time spent on monitoring (p < 0.0001). A tendency towards a reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity in the Bayesian group was observed (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.16-2.12; p = 0.46). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS?: This trial demonstrates that it would be feasible to conduct a properly sized RCT comparing vancomycin Bayesian-guided AUC_0-24h /MIC to trough level monitoring. Although exploratory, this trial also showed a tendency towards reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity and an increased proportion of dosages at therapeutic targets with Bayesian monitoring.

Vancomycin Loading Doses and Nephrotoxicity on Medicine Teaching Services

Background

Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend the usage of a loading dose when using vancomycin for seriously ill patients. While the relationship between vancomycin and nephrotoxicity is the focus of many studies, few studies have examined the relationship between vancomycin loading doses and nephrotoxicity.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study examining vancomycin dosing for internal medicine teaching services' patients over the 2014-15 academic year at one academic medical center. We generated a list of all hospitalized patients aged 18-85 who received vancomycin and were admitted to a teaching service. Nephrotoxicity was determined by 7-day acute kidney injury (AKI) rate. Patients in the loading dose cohort were compared with those in the standard-dose cohort. Primary modeling used multivariable logistic regression with AKI as our outcome of interest.

Results

Four hundred and thirty-eight patients were included for analysis. The loading dose (n = 365, 83%) and standard dosing (n = 73, 17%) cohorts were not significantly different regarding demographics, GFR, nephrotoxic drug exposure, total vancomycin received, trough levels, or comorbidities and were only significantly different regarding body mass index (BMI). The 7-day AKI rate was not significantly different between the two arms (6.3% in the standard dosing arm and 8.2% in the loading dose arm, p = 0.6).

Conclusion

Few studies have examined the relationship between nephrotoxicity and vancomycin loading doses. The results of this study provide evidence that the use of loading doses is not significantly associated with increased 7-day AKI rate.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in the Framework of Model-Informed Precision Dosing: A Consensus Review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Background: To promote model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) for vancomycin (VCM), we developed statements for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods: Ten clinical questions were selected. The committee conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis as well as clinical studies to establish recommendations for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing. Results: AUC-guided dosing tended to more strongly decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) than trough-guided dosing, and a lower risk of treatment failure was demonstrated for higher AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios (cut-off of 400). Higher AUCs (cut-off of 600 μg·h/mL) significantly increased the risk of AKI. Although Bayesian estimation with two-point measurement was recommended, the trough concentration alone may be used in patients with mild infections in whom VCM was administered with q12h. To increase the concentration on days 1–2, the routine use of a loading dose is required. TDM on day 2 before steady state is reached should be considered to optimize the dose in patients with serious infections and a high risk of AKI. Conclusions: These VCM TDM guidelines provide recommendations based on MIPD to increase treatment response while preventing adverse effects.

Vancomycin in ICU Patients with Gram-Positive Infections: Initial Trough Levels and Mortality

Background

Vancomycin is one of the most common therapeutic agents for treating gram-positive infections, particularly in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with initial therapeutic vancomycin trough levels and mortality in a tertiary-care intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated 301 adult ICU patients admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 with confirmed gram-positive infections and received intravenous vancomycin. Vancomycin trough levels of 15–20 mg/L for severe infections and 10–15 mg/L for less severe infections were considered therapeutic.

Results

The patients were relatively older with a mean age of 60 (SD ±20) years. Initial vancomycin trough levels were therapeutic in 168 (55.8%). Factors associated with initial therapeutic vancomycin trough levels were female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=2.575), older age (aOR=1.024), receiving a loading dose (aOR=2.445), having bacteremia (aOR=2.061), and high platelet count (aOR=1.003). On the other hand, the increase of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (aOR=0.993) and albumin levels (aOR=0.944) were associated with lower odds of initial therapeutic vancomycin trough levels. Factors associated with higher mortality were female gender (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=2.630), increased body weight (aHR=1.021), cancer (aHR=3.451), and high APACHE II score (aHR=1.068).

Conclusion

The study identified several factors associated with achieving initial therapeutic vancomycin trough levels (i.e. older age, female gender, receiving a loading dose, bacteremia, high platelets count, low eGFR and albumin level). These factors should be considered in the dosing of vancomycin in critically ill patients with gram-positive infections.

Effect of Vancomycin Loading Doses on the Attainment of Target Trough Concentrations in Hospitalized Children

OBJECTIVE

Subtherapeutic vancomycin trough concentrations are common in children and may be associated with suboptimal therapeutic response. Our objective was to determine if vancomycin loading doses safely increase the frequency of target trough attainment in hospitalized children.

METHODS

Patients (≥6 months and <18-years-old) who received a vancomycin loading dose between February 1, 2018, and January 30, 2019, were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were compared to a convenience cohort of patients hospitalized between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015, who received vancomycin without a loading dose. Target trough concentrations were defined as >15 mg/dL for invasive infections and >10 mg/dL for non-invasive infections.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were enrolled, with 77 in the control arm and 74 in the loading dose arm. There was no significant difference in the frequency of comorbidities or need for intensive care unit admission between the two arms. Those receiving a vancomycin loading dose were older (mean age 9.1 vs 5.2 years, p < 0.0001). Patients given a loading dose achieved higher mean initial trough values (13.0 mg/dL vs 9.2 mg/dL, p < 0.0001), were more likely to have an initial trough at or above target (37.0% vs 10.4%, p = 0.0001), were more likely to reach target trough values at any point during therapy (52.1% vs 32.9%, p = 0.0081), and attained a target trough concentration more quickly (mean 41.1 hours vs 58.8 hours, p = 0.0118). There were no significant differences in the frequency of serum creatinine elevation or oliguria at the end of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin loading doses may improve the ability to safely obtain target trough values in hospitalized children.

Vancomycin loading dose is associated with increased early clinical response without attainment of initial target trough concentration at a steady state in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines suggest a loading dose of 25-30 mg/kg for seriously ill patients. However, high-quality data to guide the use of loading doses are lacking. We aimed to evaluate whether a loading dose (a) achieved a target trough concentration at steady state and (b) improved early clinical response.

METHODS

Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m² were included. A loading dose of 25 mg/kg vancomycin followed by 15 mg/kg twice daily was compared with traditional dosing. A C_min sample was obtained before the fifth dose. An early clinical response 48-72 hours after the start of therapy and clinical success at end of therapy (EOT) was evaluated in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci or Enterococcus faecium.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in C_min between the regimen with and without a loading dose (median: 10.4 and 10.2 µg/mL, P = .54). Proportions of patients achieving 10-20 and 15-20 µg/mL were 56.9% and 5.6%, respectively, in patients with a loading dose. Although there was no significant difference in success rate at EOT between groups, a loading dose was associated with increased early clinical response for all infections (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 4.588, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.373-15.330) and MRSA infections (OR: 12.065, 95% CI: 1.821-79.959). Study limitations included no C_min measurements within 24 hours and the inclusion of less critically ill patients.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

A loading dose of 25 mg/kg followed by 15 mg/kg twice daily did not achieve the optimal Cmin at steady state in patients with normal renal function. However, more early clinical responses were obtained with a loading dose compared with traditional dosing, possibly because of a prompt albeit temporary achievement of a more effective concentration.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the teicoplanin trough level after the loading doses in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

The optimal loading dose of teicoplanin in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has never been determined by therapeutic drug monitoring. This study investigated the appropriateness of proposed loading dose regimens of teicoplanin when administered to patients receiving VA-ECMO by using a previously proposed loading dosage and measuring the teicoplanin trough concentration (C_trough).

METHODS

Patients who initiated teicoplanin therapy while receiving VA-ECMO were enrolled. Every included patient received four loading doses of teicoplanin at a dose of 12 mg/kg. The first three doses were administered 12 h apart, and the fourth dose was administered 24 h after the third dose. Blood samples were collected before administering the maintenance dose (i.e., the fifth dose), and the teicoplanin C_trough was measured. Serum teicoplanin levels were determined using an Agilent 1290 ultra-high performance liquid chromatography system.

RESULTS

The teicoplanin C_trough was successfully tested in 11 patients. Their median age was 68.2 years, and 81.8% of them were men. The median of each loading dose was 11.6 (range, 10.7-12.8) mg/kg. The median teicoplanin C_trough was 22.01 (range, 14.85-44.84) mg/L. All patients had a C_trough of more than 10 mg/L, whereas 90.9% (10/11) of the patients achieved a C_trough of more than 15 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

The loading dosage consisting of four doses of teicoplanin administered within the first 72 h at a dose of 12 mg/kg/dose could achieve an adequate therapeutic C_trough of teicoplanin in patients receiving VA-ECMO.

The clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin loading dose: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of using vancomycin loading dose remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin loading dose in the treatment of infections.

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception up to 5 May 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other observational studies were included if they provided clinical outcomes or trough concentrations of vancomycin loading dose (20-30 mg/kg) and conventional-dose (10-20 mg/kg) in the treatment of infections. Achievement of therapeutic concentration (serum trough concentrations of vancomycin reached 15-20 mg/L before the second dose), clinical response (clinical improvement or culture-negative), nephrotoxicity (serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥50% increasing from the baseline), other adverse events (including pruritus, flushing, rash, and/or red man syndrome), and mortality were analyzed. Heterogeneity was identified using the Cochrane I statistic, and P-value <.10 or I-values >50% indicated significant heterogeneity. Pooled estimates of the intervention effects were determined by the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in Review Manager program, version 5.3.5.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and 7 cohort studies including 2816 infected patients were selected for the analysis, in which serum trough concentrations of vancomycin following the use of vancomycin loading dose or other outcomes were available. Loading dose group had a significantly higher compliance rate of serum trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L (OR = 3.06; 95% CI = 1.15-8.15; P = .03) and significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40-0.87; P = .008; I = 29%) compared with control group. No significant difference was noted between loading dose group and control group in terms of other adverse events and clinical response (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 0.80-4.93; P = .14; I = 0%). The use of vancomycin loading doses in patients can indeed increase the achievement of therapeutic concentration.

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin loading dose increases the achievement of therapeutic concentration without bringing extra risk of nephrotoxicity. However, well-designed large-scale RCTs remain needed to validate the clinical efficacy of vancomycin loading dose and to further evaluate other adverse reactions and mortality.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018093927.

Is there still a role for vancomycin in skin and soft-tissue infections?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSIs) are among the commonest infections encountered in clinical practice. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SSIs continues to increase in both health care and community settings and presents a challenge for the best treatment choice. Vancomycin has been the mainstay of SSIs treatment, but recently its use has been questioned because of concerns about its efficacy, tolerability, and unfavorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile. The purpose of this review is to establish the current role for vancomycin in light of the literature published from January 2007 to September 2017 on comparison with both old and new alternatives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meta-analyses show better clinical and microbiological outcomes for drugs approved for the treatment of SSI, including those sustained by methicillin-resistant S. aureus, in the last 10 years than for vancomycin. The newer glycopeptides and linezolid decrease the total treatment costs compared with vancomycin, by reducing the length of stay or avoiding the hospitalization.

SUMMARY

Vancomycin is noninferior in efficacy and safety to all comparator drugs, including the newest on the market. However, the SSI treatment evidence base presents several shortcomings limiting the clinical applicability of the results. High-level clinical trials should be performed to obtain results that can be generalized and applied effectively in clinical practice.

The Effect of Hypoalbuminemia on the Therapeutic Concentration and Dosage of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Septic Patients in Low-Resource Countries

Purpose:

To determine whether severe hypoalbuminemia (<25 mg/L) has a significant effect on serum levels of vancomycin and whether it can effect vancomycin dosage regimen and the loading dose administration.

Material and Methods:

Prospective, cohort, and a single-center study included 61 patients whose vancomycin serum levels were measured in steady state. Vancomycin trough levels (C_min) that were in the range 15 to 20 µg/mL were considered therapeutic and trough levels higher than 15 µg/mL were considered potentially nephrotoxic.

Results:

In the group of patients with severe hypoalbuminemia, C_min was significantly higher compared to the those with nonsevere hypoalbuminemia (>25 mg/L; 23.04 [19.14] vs 13.28 [11.28], P = .01). In the group of patients who received the vancomycin loading dose of 2 g, C_min was significantly higher in patients with severe hypoalbuminemia compared to the patients with nonsevere hypoalbuminemia (34.52 [25.93] vs 15.37 [10.48], P = .04).

Conclusion:

In critically ill septic patients with severe hypoalbuminemia, there is a high probability that the loading dose of vancomycin is not necessary since it is associated with potentially toxic vancomycin C_min, while in the patients with nonsevere hypoalbuminemia the loading dose may be necessary to achieving therapeutic C_min.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012."

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS

The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.

RESULTS

The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

A simulation of loading doses for vancomycin continuous infusion regimens in intensive care

BACKGROUND

Delayed achievement of target vancomycin serum concentrations may adversely affect clinical outcomes. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the prediction accuracy of different body weight descriptors for volume of distribution and to propose an optimal loading dose (LD) for continuous infusion regimens in adults.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic variables were computed using one-compartmental analysis. Simulated LDs of vancomycin were evaluated for each patient.

RESULTS

Volume of distribution, clearance, and half-life median values (interquartile range) for vancomycin in the study population (n = 30) were 0.45 (0.39-0.61) L.kg^-1, 0.026 (0.015-0.040) L.h^-1.kg^-1, and 10.3 (7.7-21.3) h, respectively. The observed volume of distribution was better predicted by total body weight (TBW) than by the ideal body weight or the adjusted body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

An LD of 10.7 mg per kg TBW was optimal in our study population. Using this LD, 17.9% of simulated vancomycin serum levels were just below the therapeutic range, only 10.7% concentrations exceeded the target range and no concentration was toxic. The use of a LD would lead to reduced median time to reach target concentrations from 17 to 1 h.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012".

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS

The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.

RESULTS

The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

High Single-dose Vancomycin Loading Is Not Associated With Increased Nephrotoxicity in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients

OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin loading doses are recommended; however, the risk of nephrotoxicity with these doses is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare nephrotoxicity in emergency department (ED) sepsis patients who received vancomycin at high doses (>20 mg/kg) versus lower doses (≤20 mg/kg).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in three academic EDs. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, intravenous vancomycin order, and hospital admission. Exclusion criteria were no documented weight, hemodialysis-dependent, and inadequate serum creatinine (SCr) values for the measured outcome. Analyses compared the incidence of nephrotoxicity for patients who received vancomycin at high dose (>20 mg/kg) versus low dose (≤20 mg/kg).

RESULTS

A total of 2,131 consecutive patients prescribed vancomycin over 6 months were identified. Of these, 1,330 patients had three SCr values assessed for the primary outcome. High-dose initial vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of nephrotoxicity (5.8% vs. 11.1%). After age, sex, and initial SCr were adjusted for, the risk of high-dose vancomycin compared to low-dose was decreased for the development of nephrotoxicity (relative risk = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.44 to 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Initial dosing of vancomycin > 20 mg/kg was not associated with an increased rate of nephrotoxicity compared with lower doses. Findings from this study support compliance with initial weight-based vancomycin loading doses.

Optimizing the Clinical Use of Vancomycin

The increasing number of infections produced by beta-lactam-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and the morbidity secondary to these infections make it necessary to optimize the use of vancomycin. In 2009, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Disease Pharmacists published specific guidelines about vancomycin dosage and monitoring. However, these guidelines have not been updated in the past 6 years. This review analyzes the new available information about vancomycin published in recent years regarding pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, serum concentration monitoring, and optimal vancomycin dosing in special situations (obese people, burn patients, renal replacement therapy, among others). Vancomycin efficacy is linked to a correct dosage which should aim to reach an area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of ≥400; serum trough levels of 15 to 20 mg/liter are considered a surrogate marker of an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 for a MIC of ≤1 mg/liter. For Staphylococcus aureus strains presenting with a MIC >1 mg/liter, an alternative agent should be considered. Vancomycin doses must be adjusted according to body weight and the plasma trough levels of the drug. Nephrotoxicity has been associated with target vancomycin trough levels above 15 mg/liter. Continuous infusion is an option, especially for patients at high risk of renal impairment or unstable vancomycin clearance. In such cases, vancomycin plasma steady-state level and creatinine monitoring are strongly indicated.

Empirical therapy in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infections: An Up-To-Date approach

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be an important pathogen worldwide, with high prevalence of infection in both community and hospital settings. Timely and appropriate choice of empirical therapy in the setting of MRSA infection is imperative due to the high rate of associated morbidity and mortality with MRSA infections. Initial choices should be made based on the site and severity of the infection, most notably moderate skin and soft tissue infections which may be treated with oral antibiotics (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, doxycycline/minocycline, linezolid) in the outpatient setting, versus choice of parenteral therapy in the inpatient setting of more invasive or severe disease. Though the current recommendations continue to strongly rely on vancomycin as a standard empiric choice in the setting of severe/invasive infections, alternative therapies exist with studies supporting their non-inferiority. This includes the use of linezolid in pneumonia and severe skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) and daptomycin for MRSA bacteremia, endocarditis, SSSIs and bone/joint infections. Additionally, concerns continue to arise in regards to vancomycin, such as increasing isolate MICs, and relatively high rates of clinical failures with vancomycin. Thus, the growing interest in vanomycin alternatives, such as ceftaroline, ceftobribole, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid, and their potential role in treating MRSA infections.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia management

Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the most common infection in intensive care unit patients associated with high morbidity rates and elevated economic costs; Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most frequent bacteria linked with this entity, with a high attributable mortality despite adequate treatment that is increased in the presence of multiresistant strains, a situation that is becoming more common in intensive care units. In this manuscript, we review the current management of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa, the most recent antipseudomonal agents, and new adjunctive therapies that are shifting the way we treat these infections. We support early initiation of broad-spectrum antipseudomonal antibiotics in present, followed by culture-guided monotherapy de-escalation when susceptibilities are available. Future management should be directed at blocking virulence; the role of alternative strategies such as new antibiotics, nebulized treatments, and vaccines is promising.

Empiric antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: optimizing pathogen clearance

Mortality and morbidity in severe sepsis and septic shock remain high despite significant advances in critical care. Efforts to improve outcome in septic conditions have focused on targeted, quantitative resuscitation strategies utilizing intravenous fluids, vasopressors, inotropes, and blood transfusions to correct disease-associated circulatory dysfunction driven by immune-mediated systemic inflammation. This review explores an alternate paradigm of septic shock in which microbial burden is identified as the key driver of mortality and progression to irreversible shock. We propose that clinical outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock hinge upon the optimized selection, dosing, and delivery of highly potent antimicrobial therapy.

A randomized trial of loading vancomycin in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Optimizing vancomycin dosing may help eradicate bacteria while avoiding resistance. The guidelines recommend loading doses; however, there are no data to demonstrate that this may result in a more rapid achievement of therapeutic troughs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the percentage of troughs reaching therapeutic levels at 12, 24, and 36 hours following an initial vancomycin dose of 30 mg/kg compared with 15 mg/kg.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study was performed in a community academic medical center. Patients who were to receive vancomycin in the emergency department were randomized to an initial traditional dose of 15 mg/kg or a 30-mg/kg loading dose followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 hours for 3 doses. Patients weighing >120 kg or with creatinine clearances <50 mL/min were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 99 patients were enrolled; 12 hours after the initial dose of vancomycin, there was a significantly greater proportion of patients reaching target trough levels of 15 mg/L among the patients who received a loading dose as compared with a traditional dose (34% vs 3%, P < 0.01). This trend continued at 24 hours but was not statistically significant. At 36 hours, there was no difference in the percentage of patients reaching target levels between the 2 groups. No statistically significant difference in nephrotoxicity or adverse events among the 2 groups was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

A loading dose of 30 mg/kg of vancomycin achieved a higher percentage of therapeutic levels at 12 hours when compared with the traditional dose of 15 mg/kg, without increased nephrotoxicity or adverse events.

An alternate pathophysiologic paradigm of sepsis and septic shock: implications for optimizing antimicrobial therapy

The advent of modern antimicrobial therapy following the discovery of penicillin during the 1940s yielded remarkable improvements in case fatality rate of serious infections including septic shock. Since then, pathogens have continuously evolved under selective antimicrobial pressure resulting in a lack of significant improvement in clinical effectiveness in the antimicrobial therapy of septic shock despite ever more broad-spectrum and potent drugs. In addition, although substantial effort and money has been expended on the development novel non-antimicrobial therapies of sepsis in the past 30 years, clinical progress in this regard has been limited. This review explores the possibility that the current pathophysiologic paradigm of septic shock fails to appropriately consider the primacy of the microbial burden of infection as the primary driver of septic organ dysfunction. An alternate paradigm is offered that suggests that has substantial implications for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in septic shock. This model of disease progression suggests the key to significant improvement in the outcome of septic shock may lie, in great part, with improvements in delivery of existing antimicrobials and other anti-infectious strategies. Recognition of the role of delays in administration of antimicrobial therapy in the poor outcomes of septic shock is central to this effort. However, therapeutic strategies that improve the degree of antimicrobial cidality likely also have a crucial role.

A randomized controlled trial of a vancomycin loading dose in children

BACKGROUND

Despite its frequent use, the optimal dosing regimen of intravenous vancomycin remains controversial. Achievement of therapeutic trough early in the course of illness may be beneficial. Our objective was to assess whether a loading dose of vancomycin would increase the proportion of children reaching target trough concentrations 8 hours after initiation of therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled hospitalized children aged 2-18 years prescribed vancomycin at Boston Children's Hospital between February 2011 and January 2012. Participants were randomized to receive a loading dose (30 mg/kg) or a conventional initial dose (20 mg/kg). These were followed by a 20 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours in both groups. Serum vancomycin concentrations were measured before the second and third doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using individual and population pharmacokinetic models.

RESULTS

Two of nineteen (11%) loading dose recipients had a trough 15-20 mg/L before the second dose, compared with 0 of 27 in the conventional dose group (P=0.17). However, the median area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration estimates (for a hypothetical minimum inhibitory concentration=1 mg/L) were above 400 in both groups. Red man syndrome incidence was higher in loading dose recipients (48% vs. 24%, P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

A vancomycin loading dose did not result in earlier achievement of therapeutic trough concentrations in this study. However, the systemic exposure to vancomycin in children administered 60 mg/kg/day was adequate, despite lower than recommended measured trough levels. Therefore, the need for higher target trough concentrations should be questioned.

Performance of a divided-load intravenous vancomycin dosing strategy for critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend vancomycin trough concentrations 15 to 20 µg/mL in complicated infections and all trough concentrations above 10 µg/mL.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the performance of a novel divided-load protocol designed to attain target trough concentrations within 24 hours of initiation and prevent doses given at concentrations above the target range, in critically ill patients.

METHODS

The protocol was evaluated in 79 critically ill patients through retrospective medical record review. Vancomycin serum concentrations were drawn before the third dose after initiation and after any dosing change. Steady-state concentrations were drawn before the fifth or sixth doses. Vancomycin concentrations before the second dose were predicted using a nonparametric expectation maximization algorithm.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine of 79 patients received scheduled doses, and 62 (90%) of the scheduled-dose patients attained therapeutic target concentrations 12 to 24 hours after therapy initiation. Eight scheduled-dose patients weighed > 150% of ideal body weight (IBW) and were significantly more likely to exhibit supratherapeutic trough concentrations before the fifth or sixth doses (P = .0004) compared with patients weighing ≤150% of IBW. Ten of 79 patients (8 dialysis dependent and 2 experiencing acute kidney injury) were dosed in response to measured serum drug concentrations drawn according to the divided-load protocol. All the 8 dialysis-dependent patients (100%) attained therapeutic concentrations 12 hours after therapy initiation.

CONCLUSION

The divided-load vancomycin dosing strategy achieved measured trough concentrations 15 to 20 µg/mL for most critically ill patients within 24 hours of initial dosing, without allowing doses given during supratherapeutic concentrations.

Timing of initiating glycopeptide therapy for methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: the impact on clinical outcome

When a Staphylococcus-like organism (SLO) is microscopically found in Gram staining of blood culture (BC) specimen, it seems reasonable to administrate a glycopeptide (GP) for empirical therapy. The paper investigates the risk factors for 14-day mortality in patients with methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB) and clarifies the impact of the timing for initiating GP therapy. A retrospective study identifies patients with MRSAB (endocarditis was excluded) between 2006 and 2009. Patients were categorized as receiving GP at the interval before a preliminary BC report indicating the growth of SLO and the onward 24 hours or receiving GP 24 h after a preliminary BC report indicating the growth of SLO. Total 339 patients were enrolled. There was no difference on the 14-day overall or infection-related mortality rates at the time to administer GP. Multivariate analysis disclosed pneumonia (OR = 4.47; of 95% CI; of 2.09–9.58; P < 0.01) and high APACHE II score (OR, 2.81, with 95% CI, 1.19–6.65; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for infection-related mortality. The mortality rate did not decrease following administrating GP immediately after a preliminary BC indicating SLO growth. An additional research for the optimal timing for initiating GP treatment is warranted.

Traditional weight-based vancomycin dosing is inadequate in critically ill trauma patients

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate our institution's compliance with weight-based vancomycin dosing recommendations for pneumonia in critically ill injured patients and to assess the success rate in achieving therapeutic serum vancomycin levels. Additionally, we sought to assess the incidence of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

All injured intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving intravenous vancomycin between May 1, 2004 and July 31, 2010 were identified through our trauma database and pharmacy records. The initial weight-based dose was calculated and compared with vancomycin trough levels.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were identified who satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Only 12 patients (40%) received adequate weight-based dosing (weight-based, 30 mg/kg/day). Weight-based patients weighed significantly less than non-weight-based patients (62.7 vs. 84.2 kg, p = 0.0008). Weight-based patients were more likely to achieve therapeutic trough levels than non-weight-based patients (58 vs. 33%, p = 0.176). Of patients who achieved therapeutic trough levels, more weight-based patients achieved it at first trough than non-weight-based patients (33 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

When prescribing commonly used dosing regimens, appropriate weight-based administration of vancomycin occurred in only approximately one-third of patients. Those patients who did receive weight-based vancomycin dosing were more likely to achieve therapeutic levels, both initially (33 vs. 5.6%) and overall (58 vs. 33%).

Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for adult and pediatric patients with MRSA infections. The guidelines discuss the management of a variety of clinical syndromes associated with MRSA disease, including skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), bacteremia and endocarditis, pneumonia, bone and joint infections, and central nervous system (CNS) infections. Recommendations are provided regarding vancomycin dosing and monitoring, management of infections due to MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, and vancomycin treatment failures.

Use of vancomycin pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties in the treatment of MRSA infections

Vancomycin is a commonly used antimicrobial in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Increasing vancomycin MIC values in MRSA clinical isolates makes the optimization of vancomycin dosing pivotal to its continued use. Unfortunately, limited data exist regarding the optimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) goal to improve bacterial killing and clinical outcomes with vancomycin. The hallmark study in this area suggests that achieving an AUC to MIC ratio of over 400 improves the likelihood of achieving these outcomes. Challenges in the implementation of PK-PD-based dosing for vancomycin include current methodologies utilized in microbiology laboratories, as well as intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Individualized dosing based on MIC and specific patient factors is important to achieve optimal outcomes from vancomycin therapy.

Evaluation of glycopeptide prescription and therapeutic drug monitoring at a university hospital

The aim of this study was to assess the appropriateness of glycopeptide prescription almost 15 y after the publication of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidelines. We also assessed the adequacy of dose regimen and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). All glycopeptide prescriptions were collected during a 3-month prospective study and evaluated by 2 independent infectious diseases experts. Appropriateness of prescription was assessed according to local guidelines based on the HICPAC recommendations. A total of 154 prescriptions were evaluated: 77% (69.1-83.0) were appropriate and 36% (28.2-43.8) were adequate with regard to dose regimen and loading dose. Multivariate analysis showed greater appropriateness for vancomycin than for teicoplanin (p=0.01). There was a wide discrepancy among units (p=0.04). TDM was appropriately performed in 40% (32.3-47.7) of glycopeptide treatments. When required, dose regimen adaptations occurred in 58% of cases. In conclusion, we show a satisfactory appropriateness of glycopeptide prescription. However, the adequacy of dose regimens must be improved. Finally, TDM does not comply with recent recommendations in most cases.

[Dosage adjustment of vancomycin in continuous infusion in critically ill-patients]

INTRODUCTION

As the susceptibility of staphylococcal strains to glycopeptides rises, it is becoming necessary to increase vancomycin dosages.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an administration protocol for vancomycin using continuous infusion with a loading dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 30 mg/kg per 24h in intensive care patients presenting creatinine clearance (CLc) greater than 50.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were included in the study. Serum vancomycin concentrations after 24h (C24h) ranged from 25 to 30 mg/l in seven of 14 patients with CLc less than 120 ml/min (50 %), compared with three patients (21 %) with C24h greater than 35 mg/l and four patients (29 %) with C24 h less than 25 mg/l. However, C24h was less than 20mg/l for the eight patients with CLc greater or equal to 120 ml/min. Bacteriological data was available for eight of the 14 patients with CLc less than 120 ml/min, and in these eight patients, the C24h/MIC was greater or equal to 8; seven of these patients had an AUC/MIC greater or equal to 350.

CONCLUSION

Assay of serum vancomycin concentrations after 24h of treatment is necessary to enable rapid adjustment of vancomycin concentration in order to improve therapeutic efficacy or avoid nephrotoxicity.