Efficacy of temocillin against MDR Enterobacterales: a retrospective cohort study

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based optimization of temocillin dosing strategies for the treatment of systemic infections

BACKGROUND

Temocillin is increasingly considered as an alternative to carbapenems. However, there is no consensus on optimal dosing strategies and limited data on temocillin efficacy in systemic infections.

OBJECTIVES

We compared temocillin dosing strategies using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation based on plasma exposure and in vitro time-kill data.

METHODS

Temocillin effects on four Escherichia coli strains were evaluated using static time-kill experiments and the hollow-fibre infection model, in which unbound plasma concentrations following intermittent and continuous infusion regimens of 4 and 6 g daily were replicated over 72 h. A PK/PD model was developed to describe the time-kill data. The PK/PD model was coupled to a population PK model of temocillin in critically ill patients to predict bacterial killing and resistance development following various dosing regimens.

RESULTS

Amplification of resistant subpopulations was observed within 24 h for all strains. The PK/PD model described the observed bacterial kill kinetics and resistance development from both experimental systems well. Simulations indicated dose-dependent bacterial killing within and beyond the currently used daily dose range, and a superiority of continuous compared with intermittent infusions. However, regrowth of resistant subpopulations was frequently observed. For two strains, bacteriostasis over 72 h was predicted only with doses that are higher than those currently licensed.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusions and 6 g daily doses of temocillin kill E. coli more effectively than 4 g daily doses and intermittent infusions, and may increase efficacy in the treatment of systemic infections. However, higher daily doses may be required to suppress resistance development.

Effectiveness of temocillin in treatment of non-urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and risk factors for failure

Objectives

To describe the real-life use of temocillin for non-urinary tract infections, to assess its effectiveness in infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and to identify risk factors for treatment failure.

Method

Retrospective multicentric study in 14 tertiary care hospitals, including all patients who received at least one dose of temocillin for ESBL infections from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2021 for non-urinary tract infections. Failure was a composite criterion defined within 28 day follow-up by persistence or reappearance of signs of infection, and/or switch to suppressive antibiotic treatment and/or death from infection. Logistic regression with univariable and multivariable analysis was performed to identify risks associated with failure.

Results

Data on 163 infection episodes were collected; 133 were due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and 128 were included in the effectiveness analysis. Median (IQR) age was 61 (53-70) years and 61.7% of patients were male. Main indications were lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI; 28.9%), intra-abdominal infections (IAI; 28.1%) and cutaneous infections (12.5%). The main bacteria involved were Klebsiella pneumoniae (48.4%), Escherichia coli (25.0%) and Enterobacter cloacae (24.2%). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 45.3% of cases. Temocillin was used as monotherapy in 86/128 (67.2%). Failure was found in 36/128 (28.1%) cases. In multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with failure was initial severity of the episode [adjusted OR 3.0 (95% CI: 1.06-8.69)].

Conclusions

During non-urinary tract infections, the main use of temocillin was for LRTIs and IAIs due to ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The main risk factor for failure was initial severity of the disease.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacological target attainment of standard temocillin dosing in non-critically ill patients with complicated urinary tract infections

OBJECTIVES

Temocillin, a carbapenem-sparing β-lactam antibiotic, is commonly used at the standard 4 g/day dosage for treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). However, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data supporting this regimen is limited. This study evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) and PTA of temocillin in non-critically ill cUTI patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency (RI).

METHODS

In this single-centre clinical study, 22 cUTI patients received a fixed 4 g/day (2 g q12h, intravenously) temocillin dose, irrespective of renal function (no RI: n = 5, mild RI: n = 8, moderate RI: n = 9). Plasma samples were collected post-dosing for LC-MS analysis of total and unbound temocillin levels. Monte Carlo simulations were performed based on the established PK/PD target of ≥35% fT > MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration).

RESULTS

Among patients, the highest plasma drug exposure and PK/PD target attainment were observed in those with moderate RI (median AUC0-12h = 1143 h.mg/L and %fT > MIC = 68%), followed by mild RI patients (median AUC0-12h = 918 h.mg/L and %fT > MIC = 34%), and the lowest in those with healthy kidney function (median AUC0-12h = 692 h.mg/L and %fT > MIC = 26%). Simulations indicated that the 4 g/day temocillin dose achieves 90% PTA only for glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min and MIC ≤ 8 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

The standard temocillin dose may need to be increased from 4 to 6 g/day to treat non-critically ill cUTI patients, in line with recent EUCAST recommendations. For patients with moderate RI, who experience higher exposure due to reduced renal drug clearance, 4 g/day temocillin remains appropriate.

Temocillin for febrile urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in children: a monocentric exposed/non-exposed study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of temocillin with standard of care (SOC) for treatment of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) febrile urinary tract infection (ESBL-E FUTI) in children.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective study of children hospitalized with confirmed ESBL-E FUTI from January 2015 to May 2022 was conducted, comparing clinical cure and a 3 month relapse between two groups of patients: 'exposed' patients (EP) and 'non-exposed' patients (NEP) to temocillin. EP received temocillin for at least 3 days. They were matched (1:1 ratio) on age group, sex and presence of uropathy with NEP who received SOC antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-six temocillin-treated children (EP) were matched with 36 SOC children (NEP); 72.2% were under 2 years old (n = 52) and 75.0% had a congenital uropathy (n = 54). EPs had more FUTI history (97.2%, n = 35) than NEPs (61.1%, n = 22) (P < 0.01). Clinical cure rate was 98.6% overall, with no difference between the two groups, as for the FUTI relapse rate, which was 37.1% for EPs versus 27.8% for NEPs (P = 0.45). In bivariate analyses, factors associated with relapses were congenital uropathy (91.3% versus 66.7%, P = 0.04) and subtypes of uropathy, with refluxing uropathy and posterior urethral valves being the more prevalent. Median duration of hospitalization was longer in the EPs (8.0 versus 5.0 days) (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The high clinical cure rate and comparable outcomes suggest that temocillin may be an effective therapeutic alternative to standard treatment for ESBL-E FUTI in children.

Successful prophylaxis of ESBL Enterobacteriaceae repetitive urinary tract infections with subcutaneous temocillin: a case report

Objectives

Temocillin is an antibiotic belonging to the β-lactam family, introduced in 1988 but soon forgotten because of its narrow spectrum. Recently, it has been repurposed for its effectiveness against ESBL Enterobacteriaceae, and represents an alternative of choice to carbapenems due to its limited impact on the microbiota.

Patient

We present here a successful case of antibiotic prophylaxis of recurrent ESBL urinary tract infections with subcutaneously administered temocillin.

Conclusions

Temocillin is rarely administered subcutaneously and even more rarely in prophylactic situations. However, its tolerance profile and low impact on the microbiota should help reconsideration of its use in particular cases like this one.

Multicenter interlaboratory study of routine systems for the susceptibility testing of temocillin using a challenge panel of multidrug-resistant strains

Accurate susceptibility result of temocillin (TMO) is important for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. This multicenter study aimed to investigate the performance of routine temocillin testing assays against Enterobacterales challenging strains. Forty-seven selected clinical isolates were blindly analyzed by 12 Belgian laboratories using VITEK® 2 (n = 5) and BD Phoenix™ (n = 3) automated systems, ETEST® gradient strip (n = 3), and disk (3 brands) diffusion method (DD; n = 6) for temocillin susceptibility using standardized methodology. Results were interpreted using EUCAST 2023 criteria and compared to the broth microdilution (BMD; Sensititre™ panel) method used as gold standard. Methods' reproducibility was assessed by testing 3 reference strains in triplicate. A total of 702 organism-drug results were obtained against 33 TMO-susceptible and 14 TMO-resistant isolates. Excluding Proteae species (P. mirabilis and M. morganii), the essential agreement rates were excellent (91.5-100%) for all MIC-based methods. The highest category agreement was achieved by ETEST® (97.5%) followed by VITEK® 2 (93.2%), disk diffusion (91.6%), and BD Phoenix™ (88.5%). BD Phoenix™ and paper disk diffusion overcalled resistance (11.5% and 6.8% of major discrepancies, respectively), while ROSCO tablets diffusion and VITEK® 2 generated higher very major discrepancies (7.1% and 4.2% respectively). Inter-assay reproducibility was unsatisfactory using recommended E. coli ATCC 25922 strain but was excellent with E. coli ATCC 35218 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 strains. This interlaboratory study suggests that routine testing methods provide accurate and reproducible TMO categorization results except for Proteae species.

Impact of revised breakpoints on the categorization of susceptibility of Enterobacterales to temocillin

Background

To harmonize with the EUCAST breakpoints, the French Society of Microbiology introduced a change in the inhibition diameter breakpoint (17 mm versus 20 mm previously) of temocillin. We assessed the impact of the new breakpoints on categorizing susceptibility of Enterobacterales to temocillin.

Methods

This was a multicentric retrospective study including all Enterobacterales isolates routinely tested for temocillin susceptibility with the disc diffusion method between 1 January 2016 and 31 July 2022 in four centres. Categorization using the breakpoints of 20 mm (French guidelines CA-SFM/EUCAST 2020 v.1.1) and 17 mm (French guidelines CA-SFM/EUCAST 2021 v1.0 and EUCAST guidelines v11.0) was performed.

Results

Overall, 36 416 Enterobacterales isolates were included. The overall rate of temocillin resistance decreased from 11.3% to 4.7% (relative difference of 58.5%) when using the 17 mm breakpoint instead of the 20 mm breakpoint, respectively. The relative change ranged from -44.0% in Klebsiella aerogenes to -72.7% in Klebsiella oxytoca. The median inhibition diameter was 23 mm (IQR 21-25). The isolates with a diameter of 20 mm appeared overrepresented, whereas those with a diameter of 18 and 19 mm were underrepresented. We therefore reviewed the diameters between 18 and 21 mm of 273 isolates. Thirty-two (11.7%) of them categorized as susceptible at first measure were controlled resistant at second measure.

Conclusions

The new breakpoint induced a decrease in the rate of isolates categorized as resistant to temocillin, increasing therapeutic choice including for Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). We suggest the bias in measuring the inhibition diameter is probably related to the fact that temocillin is considered remarkably stable against broad-spectrum β-lactamases.

Real-life temocillin use in Greater Paris area, effectiveness and risk factors for failure in infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales: a multicentre retrospective study

Background

Temocillin is a β-lactam that is not hydrolysed by ESBLs.

Objectives

To describe the real-life use of temocillin, to assess its effectiveness in infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and to identify risk factors for treatment failure.

Methods

Retrospective multicentric study in eight tertiary care hospitals in the Greater Paris area, including patients who received at least one dose of temocillin for ESBL infections from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Failure was a composite criterion defined within 28 day follow-up by persistence or reappearance of signs of infection, and/or switch to suppressive antibiotic treatment and/or death from infection. A logistic regression with univariable and multivariable analysis was performed to identify risks associated with failure.

Results

Data on 130 infection episodes were collected; 113 were due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Mean age was 65.2 ± 15.7 years and 68.1% patients were male. Indications were mostly urinary tract infections (UTIs) (85.8%), bloodstream infections (11.5%), respiratory tract infections (RTIs) (3.5%) and intra-abdominal infections (3.5%). Bacteria involved were Escherichia coli (49.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (44.2%) and Enterobacter cloacae (8.8%). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 23.0% of cases. Temocillin was mostly used in monotherapy (102/113, 90.3%). Failure was found in 13.3% of cases. Risk factors for failure in multivariable analysis were: RTI (aOR 23.3, 95% CI 1.5-358.2) and neurological disease (aOR 5.3, 95% CI 1.5-18.6).

Conclusions

The main use of temocillin was UTI due to ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae, with a favourable clinical outcome. The main risk factor for failure was neurological disease.

Assessing Clinical Potential of Old Antibiotics against Severe Infections by Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Using In Silico Modelling

In the light of increasing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria and the lack of new more potent antimicrobial agents, new strategies have been explored. Old antibiotics, such as colistin, temocillin, fosfomycin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and chloramphenicol, have attracted the attention since they often exhibit in vitro activity against multi-drug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. The current review provides a summary of the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics and PK/PD characteristics of old antibiotics. In silico modelling was then performed using Monte Carlo simulation in order to combine all preclinical data with human pharmacokinetics and determine the probability of target (1-log kill in thigh/lung infection animal models) attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens. The potential of clinical efficacy of a drug against severe infections by MDR gram-negative bacteria was considered when PTA was >95% at the epidemiological cutoff values of corresponding species. In vitro potent activity against MDR gram-negative pathogens has been shown for colistin, polymyxin B, temocillin (against E. coli and K. pneumoniae), fosfomycin (against E. coli), mecillinam (against E. coli), minocycline (against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii), and chloramphenicol (against E. coli) with ECOFF or MIC90 ≤ 16 mg/L. When preclinical PK/PD targets were combined with human pharmacokinetics, Monte Carlo analysis showed that among the old antibiotics analyzed, there is clinical potential for polymyxin B against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii; for temocillin against K. pneumoniae and E. coli; for fosfomycin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae; and for mecillinam against E. coli. Clinical studies are needed to verify the potential of those antibiotics to effectively treat infections by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria.

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of temocillin for bloodstream infections with Enterobacterales: a Belgian single-centre retrospective study

Background

Expanding the use of temocillin could be an important weapon in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. However, EUCAST defined clinical breakpoints for a limited number of species and only for urinary tract infections (UTI), including urosepsis but excluding severe sepsis and septic shock. Moreover, a dosage of 2 g q8h is advised in most cases.

Objectives

Evaluation of temocillin use for the treatment of bacteraemia, correlating clinical and microbiological outcomes with infection site, infection severity, temocillin dosage, Enterobacterales species and MIC.

Patients and methods

All adult patients with blood cultures positive for temocillin-susceptible Enterobacterales and treated with temocillin for ≥72 h from June 2018 until June 2021 were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as resolution of infection signs, no relapse of the same infection and no antibiotic switch due to insufficient clinical improvement. The secondary outcome was microbiological success.

Results

In total, 182 episodes were included [140 UTI versus 42 non-UTI, 171 Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species (except Klebsiella aerogenes) and Proteus mirabilis (EKPs) versus 11 non-EKPs]. Clinical and microbiological failure were low (8% and 3%, respectively). No difference in outcome was observed for dosages of 2 g q12h versus 2 g q8h, either for EKP versus non-EKP isolates or MIC values ≤8 versus 16 mg/L. Considering only bacteraemia episodes of UTI origin, using the 16 mg/L breakpoint, there was no difference in success rate between regimens of 2 g q12h and 2 g q8h.

Conclusions

Temocillin 2 g q12h can be successfully used for the treatment of systemic UTI. Prospective studies are needed to assess outcomes and evaluate non-inferiority compared with other broad-spectrum antibiotics in non-UTI infections, including bacteraemia.

Temocillin: Applications in Antimicrobial Stewardship as a Potential Carbapenem-Sparing Antibiotic

Temocillin is an old antibiotic, but given its particular characteristics, it may be a suitable alternative to carbapenems for treating infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and uncomplicated UTI due to KPC-producers. In this narrative review, the main research question was to summarize current evidence on temocillin and its uses in infectious diseases. A search was run on PubMed using the terms ('Temocillin' [Mesh]) AND ('Infection' [Mesh]). Current knowledge regarding temocillin in urinary tract infection, blood-stream infections, pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, central nervous system infections, skin and soft tissues infections, surgical sites infections and osteoarticular Infections were summarized. Temocillin retain a favourable profile on microbiota and risk of Clostridioides difficile infections and could be an option for treating outpatients. Temocillin may be a valuable tool to treat susceptible pathogens and for which a carbapenem could be spared. Other advantages in temocillin use are that it is well-tolerated; it is associated with a low rate of C. difficile infections; it is active against ESBL, AmpC, and KPC-producing Enterobacterales; and it can be used in the OPAT clinical setting.

Temocillin versus carbapenems for urinary tract infection due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a multicenter matched case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of temocillin with carbapenems for extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae urinary tract infections (ESBL-E UTI).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective case-control study of adults with ESBL-E UTI was conducted between January 2015 and October 2019. Cases received temocillin ≥ 50% of the effective antibiotic therapy duration and controls exclusively received carbapenem; they were statistically matched (1:1 ratio) on 6-month period, sex and age. The clinical cure at the end of antibiotic therapy was analysed using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Seventy-two temocillin cases were matched to 72 carbapenem controls. Most (67%) were male, median age was 69.4 years, 81 (56%) were immunocompromised, including 44 (31%) solid organ transplant recipients. There was no difference between cases and controls for baseline characteristics and microorganisms involved: Klebsiella pneumoniae in 59 (41%), Escherichia coli in 57 (40%), and Enterobacter spp. in 24 (17%). The median time from admission to effective antibiotic therapy was 0 days [range, 0-2]. Among cases, first-line antibiotic therapy (≤ 72 hours) was temocillin in six (8%) and carbapenems in 39 (54%). Temocillin was given at the median daily dose of 4 g [range, 2-4] after 3 days [range, 2-5] of carbapenems. Patients received temocillin for 81% [range, 70-93] of the effective antibiotic course duration over 11 days [range, 8-14]. The effective antibiotic duration was similar in cases and controls (P = 0.067). Clinical cure at the end of antibiotic therapy was 94% (68/72) in cases vs. 99% (71/72) in controls (P = 0.206), with no difference among immunocompromised and solid organ transplant patients (P > 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

Temocillin effectively relayed β-lactams, including carbapenems, to treat (complicated) ESBL-E UTI. Its efficacy was consistent among kidney transplant recipients.