In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam and other novel antibiotics against imipenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative bacilli from Taiwan

Real-world use and treatment outcomes of ceftazidime-avibactam in gram-negative bacterial infection in Taiwan: A multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been launched in Asian countries for five years, but local real-world data about patient characteristics, efficacy, and safety of CAZ-AVI is limited. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to investigate the clinical characteristics, microbiology, and outcomes of patients treated with CAZ-AVI for Gram-negative bacterial infection in Taiwan.

METHODS

This investigation was conducted as a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving five medical centers in Taiwan. Adult patients with documented/suspected Gram-negative bacterial infection and received ≥ 24 hours of CAZ-AVI were eligible for study cohort enrollment. In-hospital mortality was defined as the primary outcome, while symptom resolution or significant improvement, considered the secondary outcome, was defined as clinical success.

RESULTS

Among the 472 patients treated by CAZ-AVI, 46.2 % (218/472) had respiratory tract infections, 22.0 % (104/472) had complicated urinary tract infections, 14.0 % (66/472) had complicated intra-abdominal infections, and 10.0 % (47/472) had primary bacteremia. Most patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam in Taiwan are old (mean: 70.6 years old), have a high SOFA score (mean 8.4), and have a high Charlson Comorbidity Index score (345/472, 73.1 % ≥ 4). 90 % of CAZ-AVI were used as targeted therapy for pathogens, including Klebsiella pneumoniae (64.4 %, 304/472), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.8 %, 84/472), Escherichia coli (8.3 %, 39/472), and Enterobacter spp. (2.3 %, 11/472). The overall clinical success rate is 58.1 % (274/472). The in-hospital mortality rate is 41.1 % (194/472).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients receiving CAZ-AVI as targeted therapy in Taiwan with characteristics of older age, high SOFA scores, and high CCI scores. Receiving immunomodulators, higher SOFA score, and Enterobacter spp. infections were the significant factors associated with in-hospital mortality, whereas early initiating CAZ-AVI treatment and CAZ-AVI monotherapy are associated with better outcome.

In vitro activity and resistance mechanisms of novel antimicrobial agents against metallo-β-lactamase producers

The carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative organisms represent an urgent clinical and public health concern, as they have been associated with increased mortality and high dissemination in healthcare settings. Although overall incidence rates of infections sustained by metallo-β-lactamase (MβL)-producers have remained lower than those sustained by other carbapenemase-producers, albeit with substantial geographic differences, a significant increase in the prevalence of MβL-producers has been observed over the last decade. The recent development of new antimicrobials expanded the armamentarium to counter the challenge of metallo-β-lactamase (MβL)-producers. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam are already clinically available and recommended by international guidelines. In addition, two new classes of β-lactam/ β-lactamase combinations are under clinical evaluation: (i) combination of β-lactam with novel boronic-derived inhibitors (e.g. taniborbactam and xeruborbactam), (ii) combination of β-lactam with last generation diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g. zidebactam and nacubactam), active on most of serine-β-lactamases but also showing strong intrinsic activity on PBP-2. This review aims to provide up-to-date data on the characteristics, activity and emerging resistance mechanisms of the armamentarium of clinically available or soon-to-be introduced drugs for the treatment of MβL-producing Gram-negative organisms.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients Who Acquired Gram-Negative Bacteria During Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is recommended to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance. The selective pressure of CZA results in the isolation of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), causing superinfection or hospital-wide spread. We aimed to study the clinical characteristics of patients who acquired GNB during CZA treatment.

METHODS

Adult patients treated with CZA for ≥ 5 days for proven or suspected MDR-GNB were retrospectively enrolled at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between December 2019 and June 2021. GNB acquisition was defined as new GNB species resulting in infection or colonization isolated during the period from 5 days after the initiation of CZA until the end of treatment. Clinical features were compared between patients who acquired GNB from clinical specimen and those who did not. Multivariable analysis was used to explore risk factors for acquisition of GNB and 28-day mortality in patients who acquired GNB.

RESULTS

Among 321 patients treated with CZA, 68 GNB were identified in 55 patients (17.1%). Elizabethkingia species (n = 15) was the most common GNB, followed by Acinetobacter species (n = 13) and Burkholderia cenocepacia (n = 11). The presence of diabetes mellitus, and mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for GNB acquisition. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward increased 28-day mortality in patients with GNB acquisition compared to those without (38.2% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.105). Cerebrovascular disease and acquired GNB resulting in infection were associated with 28-day mortality in patients who acquired GNB.

CONCLUSIONS

Elizabethkingia species, Acinetobacter species, and B. cenocepacia were the major GNB acquired during CZA treatment. A trend toward increased mortality was observed in patients with GNB acquisition during CZA treatment. Further studies on optimal treatments for these patients were warranted.

Antimicrobial resistance among imipenem-non-susceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, with an emphasis on novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and tetracycline derivatives: The Taiwan surveillance of antimicrobial resistance program, 2020-2022

BACKGROUND

To determine susceptibility of imipenem-non-susceptible Escherichia coli (INS-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (INS-KP) isolates collected during 2020-2022 through a national surveillance program in Taiwan to novel antibiotics, and to compare the results with those obtained during 2012-2018.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined by broth microdilution methods. Genes encoding carbapenemases including blaKPC, metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes, and blaOXA-48 were detected via multiplex PCR. Data retrieved from our 2012-2018 study were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 3260 E. coli and 1457 K. pneumoniae isolates collected during 2020-2022, 0.9 % and 9.5 %, were INS-EC and INS-KP, respectively. Cefepime-zidebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were active against 100 %, 75.9 %, 65.5 %, and 79.3 % of 29 INS-EC isolates respectively; and against 100 %, 90.6 %, 64.5 %, and 67.4 % of 138 INS- KP isolates, respectively. Susceptibility was contingent upon carbapenemase types. Susceptibility rates of cefepime-zidebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam remained constant from 2012 to 2018 through 2020-2022 but those of imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam decreased significantly, which may be partially attributable to the increasing prevalence of blaOXA-48. Eighteen MBL-gene-positive isolates and two blaKPC-positive isolates were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam, whereas all were susceptible to cefepime-zidebactam. Tigecycline had a higher susceptibility rate than eravacycline and omadacycline for K. pneumoniae isolates. Lascufloxacin and delafloxacin were effective against fewer than 10 % of INS isolates. Susceptibilities to novel tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones remained similar from 2012 to 2018 through 2020-2022.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights significant resistance patterns of INS-EC and INS-KP isolates in Taiwan. The declining susceptibility rates and the rising prevalence of genetic resistance determinants highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship.

Global trends of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is a major global concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been identified as a potential treatment option for complicated infections.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the global resistance proportions of GNB to CAZ-AVI comprehensively.

METHODS

Studies were searched in Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE (until September 2024), and statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 20.0).

RESULTS

CAZ-AVI resistance proportions were determined in 136 studies, with 25.8% (95% CI 22.2-29.7) for non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli and 6.1% (95% CI 4.9-7.4) for Enterobacterales. The CAZ-AVI resistance proportion significantly increased from 5.6% (95% CI 4.1-7.6) of 221,278 GNB isolates in 2015-2020 to 13.2% (95% CI 11.4-15.2) of 285,978 GNB isolates in 2021-2024. Regionally, CAZ-AVI resistance was highest in Asia 19.3% (95% CI 15.7-24.23.4), followed by Africa 13.6% (95% CI 5.6-29.2), Europe 11% (95% CI 7.8-15.2), South America 6.1% (95% CI 3.2-11.5) and North America 5.3% (95% CI 4.2-6.7). Among GNB resistance profiles, colistin-resistant isolates and XDR isolates exhibited the highest resistance proportions (37.1%, 95% CI 14-68 and 32.1%, 95% CI 18.5-49.6), respectively), followed by carbapenem-resistant isolates and MDR isolates [(25.8%, 95% CI 22.6-29.3) and (13%, 95% CI 9.6, 17.3)].

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of GNB isolates from urinary tract infections remained susceptible to CAZ-AVI, indicating its potential as a suitable treatment option. However, the increasing resistance trends among GNB are concerning and warrant continuous monitoring to maintain CAZ-AVI's effectiveness against GNB infections.

Comparative evaluation of eravacycline susceptibility testing methods in 587 clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates: broth microdilution, MIC test strip and disc diffusion

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different methods for determining carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) susceptibility to eravacycline.

METHODS

We collected 587 CRAB strains from Huashan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University between 2019 and 2023. The broth microdilution (BMD) method served as the reference standard. The susceptibility results were evaluated using the clinical breakpoints established by the Chinese Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (ChinaCAST) (susceptible MIC,  ≤ 1 mg/L; inhibition zone diameter,  ≥ 15 mm). The study compared the reliability of the MIC test strip (MTS) and disc diffusion (DD) methods in detecting CRAB susceptibility to eravacycline.

RESULTS

The MICs required to inhibit 50% and 90% of CRAB growth were as follows: BMD, 0.5/1 mg/L; MTS, 0.38/0.75 mg/L. According to the ChinaCAST breakpoints, the BMD method demonstrated a 98.13% (576/587) susceptibility rate, whereas the MTS and DD methods showed susceptibility rates of 97.96% (575/587) and 97.61% (573/587), respectively. The essential agreement rate between the MTS and BMD methods was 94.55%. Categorical agreement (CA) rates for the MTS and DD methods were 99.83% and 99.49%, respectively. The major error (ME) rate for MTS was 0.17%, with no very major errors (VMEs) observed. For the DD method, the ME rate was 0.51%, also with no VMEs.

CONCLUSION

The MTS and DD methods demonstrated strong consistency with the BMD reference method, with CA, ME and VME rates meeting methodological evaluation criteria. Both MTS and DD methods are reliable alternatives for assessing the antibacterial activity of eravacycline in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Activity and resistance mechanisms of the third generation tetracyclines tigecycline, eravacycline and omadacycline against nationwide Spanish collections of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii

INTRODUCTION

The rise in multidrug-resistant bacteria challenges clinical microbiology. Tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline show promise against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii. This study evaluates their activity and resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Two Spanish multicentre collections of WGS-characterized carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (n=399) and A. baumannii (n=118) were tested. The MICs of tigecycline, eravacycline, omadacycline and classic tetracyclines were determined. WGS-guided resistome analysis, expression studies, efflux pump inhibition and cloning assays identified potential mechanisms of resistance.

RESULTS

Tigecycline and eravacycline exhibited the highest activity against the whole set of Enterobacterales (MIC50/MIC90 0.5/1 mg/L and 1/2 mg/L, respectively), and A. baumannii (MIC50/MIC90 1/2 mg/L and ≤0.25/1 mg/L, respectively). Omadacycline showed no improvement relative to classic tetracyclines (MIC50/MIC90 values of 8/32 mg/L and 8/16 mg/L for Enterobacterales and A. baumannii, respectively). Resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales included efflux pumps (AcrAB-TolC, OqxAB) and mutation in their regulatory genes. In A. baumannii, adeS gene mutations and adeABC upregulation decreased tigecycline activity. The prevalent sequence types with reduced susceptibility to eravacycline and tigecycline were ST307 in K. pneumoniae and ST2 in A. baumannii.

CONCLUSION

Eravacycline remains a key agent for the treatment of bacterial infections exhibiting promising efficacy against multidrug-resistant pathogens. As an empirical antibiotic it could be a good alternative for severe infections caused by CPE or CRAB, however, its clinical use is limited by the absence of standardized breakpoints. Resistance mechanisms, including efflux pumps and gene mutations, vary among isolates. High-risk clones like K. pneumoniae ST307 and A. baumannii ST2 underscore the necessity of prudent antibiotic use.

Susceptibility evaluation of novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BIBLI) combinations are commercially available and have been used for treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Continuous surveillance of susceptibility profiles and resistance mechanism identification are necessary to monitor the evolution of resistance within these agents.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility rates of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in CRKP isolated from patients with bloodstream infections who underwent screening for a randomized clinical trial in Brazil.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam using the gradient diffusion strip method. Carbapenemase genes were detected by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates showing resistance to any BLBLI and New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-producing isolates with susceptibility to any BLBLI isolates were further submitted for whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

From a total of 69 CRKP isolates, 39 were positive for blaKPC, 19 for blaNDM and 11 for blaKPC and blaNDM. KPC-producing isolates demonstrated susceptibility rates above 94 % for all BLBLIs. Two isolates with resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam demonstrated a Gly and Asp duplication at the porin OmpK36 as well as a truncated OmpK35. All NDM-producing isolates, including KPC and NDM coproducers, demonstrated susceptibility rates to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam of 0 %, 9.1-21.1 % and 9.1-26.3 %, respectively. Five NDM-producing isolates that presented susceptibility to BLBLIs also had porin alterations CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, although high susceptibility rates to BLBLIs were found, KPC-2 isolates were able to demonstrate resistance probably as a result of porin mutations. Additionally, NDM-1 isolates showed susceptibility to BLBLIs in vitro.

Changing epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of bacteria causing bacteremia in Taiwan: 2002-2020

Bacteremia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The emergence of bacteria with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has further exacerbated the poor outcomes associated with bacteremia. The Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program was established in 1998 to monitor bacterial epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance trends across all patient types and age groups. Between 2002 and 2020, a total of 14,539 non-duplicate bacteremia isolates were collected biennially from 29 hospitals during the months of July-September as part of the TSAR program. The three most common bacteremia agents were Escherichia coli (31%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.6%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.7%) overall. However, there was a steady increase in the proportions of E. coli and Enterococcus faecium isolated from bacteremia cases (both P < 0.001), while the proportions of Acinetobacter spp. decreased. Regarding antimicrobial resistance, there was a notable increase in rates of third-generation cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone non-susceptibility among E. coli and K. pneumoniae, while the rates of carbapenem non-susceptibility were elevated but remained milder in these two species, especially in E. coli. Of concern is the alarming increase in vancomycin resistance among E. faecium, rising from 10.0% in 2004 to 47.7% in 2020. In contrast, the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus has remained stable at 51.2% overall. In conclusion, E. coli, with increasing third-generation cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone resistance, is the predominant cause of bacteremia in Taiwan during the 18-year surveillance. The escalating proportion of E. faecium in bacteremia, coupled with a concurrent upsurge in vancomycin resistance, presents a therapeutic challenge in the recent decade.

IMPORTANCE

AMR surveillance not only enables the identification of regional variations but also supports the development of coordinated efforts to combat AMR on a global scale. The TSAR has been a biennial, government-endorsed, multicenter study focusing on pathogens isolated from inpatients and outpatients in Taiwan hospitals since 1998. Our report presents an 18-year comprehensive analysis on blood isolates in the 2002-2020 TSAR program. The study highlights an alarming increase in the proportion of E. faecium causing bacteremia accompanied by elevated vancomycin resistance. It is worth noting that this trend differs from the observations in the United States and China. Understanding the composition of bacteria causing bacteremia, along with their prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, holds significant importance in establishing healthcare and research priorities. Additionally, this knowledge serves as a critical factor in evaluating the effectiveness of preventive interventions.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and other new β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates: a multi-center surveillance study

New β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations represent last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Carbapenemase gene acquisition can limit their spectrum of activity, and reports of resistance toward these new molecules are increasing. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and comparators among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from bloodstream infections, hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, and urinary tract infections, circulating in Southern Italy. We also investigated the clonality and content of relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms of CZA-resistant (CZAR) isolates. A total of 120 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected. CZA was among the most active β-lactams, retaining susceptibility in the 81.7% of cases, preceded by cefiderocol (95.8%) and followed by ceftolozane-tazobactam (79.2%), meropenem-vaborbactam (76.1%), imipenem-relebactam (75%), and aztreonam (69.6%). Among non-β-lactams, colistin and amikacin were active against 100% and 85.8% of isolates respectively. In CZAR strains subjected to whole-genome sequencing (n = 18), resistance was mainly due to the expression of metallo-β-lactamases (66.6% VIM-type and 5.5% FIM-1), followed by PER-1 (16.6%) and GES-1 (5.5%) extended-spectrum β-lactamases, mostly carried by international high-risk clones (ST111 and ST235). Of note, two strains producing the PER-1 enzyme were resistant to all β-lactams, including cefiderocol. In conclusion, the CZA resistance rate among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in Southern Italy remained low. CZAR isolates were mostly metallo-β-lactamases producers and belonging to ST111 and ST253 epidemic clones. It is important to implement robust surveillance systems to monitor emergence of new resistance mechanisms and to limit the spread of P. aeruginosa high-risk clones.

IMPORTANCE

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a growing threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is among the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections, although resistance due to the acquisition of transferable β-lactamase genes is increasing. With this work, we report that CZA represents a highly active antipseudomonal β-lactam compound (after cefiderocol), and that metallo-β-lactamases (VIM-type) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (GES and PER-type) production is the major factor underlying CZA resistance in isolates from Southern Italian hospitals. In addition, we reported that such resistance mechanisms were mainly carried by the international high-risk clones ST111 and ST235.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales: a cross-combination and dose-escalation titration study with relebactam and vaborbactam

With the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam worldwide, the antimicrobial activity of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) needs to be investigated. From January 2020 to June 2023, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales were collected. With a broth microdilution test of new BL/BLIs, cross-activity test with nine combinations of BLs and new BLIs and dose-escalation titration test for non-susceptible isolates were conducted to investigate inhibitory activities of new BLIs. A total of 188 isolates was collected and most isolates (186/188, 98.9%) carried the KPC-2 gene exclusively, while two isolates (1.1%) co-harbored NDM-1. Among the 186 KPC-2-producing isolates, 184 (98.9%) were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, 173 (93.0%) to imipenem-relebactam, and 184 (98.9%) to meropenem-vaborbactam. All isolates non-susceptible to imipenem-relebactam or meropenem-vaborbactam became susceptible when avibactam replaced relebactam or vaborbactam, with 7 of 11 (63.6%) imipenem-relebactam non-susceptible isolates and both (100.0%) of the meropenem-vaborbactam non-susceptible isolates. When the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of BLs were compared using log2 scales, combinations with avibactam showed statistically significant efficacy in lowering MICs compared to relebactam and vaborbactam (all P < 0.05). In the dose-escalation test of new BLIs, increasing dose of all new BLIs corresponded to increased susceptibility to BLs. Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited excellent susceptibility against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales unless co-harboring metallo-β-lactamase. The cross-combination test against non-susceptible isolates suggests that the inhibitory activity of avibactam was superior to those of relebactam or vaborbactam. Increasing the dose of new BLIs produced increased susceptibility to BLs, suggesting that high-concentration regimen need to be developed.

IMPORTANCE

This study investigated 188 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2-producing Enterobacterales collected from January 2020 to June 2023 in a tertiary care hospital of Korea. Most isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (98.9%) and meropenem-vaborbactam (98.9%), while susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam was lower (93.0%). The cross-combination test using nine combinations of the individual β-lactams (BLs) and new β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) showed that the inhibitory activity of avibactam was significantly superior to relebactam or vaborbactam when the Log2 MIC of BLs were compared for each combination with BLIs (all P < 0.05). The dose-escalation test of new BLIs demonstrated that increasing doses of new BLIs corresponded to increased susceptibility to BLs. Taken together, this study illustrates the excellent activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales and suggests further investigation into high-concentration regimens for potentially non-susceptible clinical isolates.

Eravacycline: a comprehensive review of in vitro activity, clinical efficacy, and real-world applications

INTRODUCTION

The escalating threat of multidrug-resistant organisms necessitates constant exploration for novel antimicrobial agents. Eravacycline has emerged as a promising solution due to its unique chemical structure, which enhances potency and expands its spectrum of activity.

AREA COVERED

This review provides a thorough examination of eravacycline, encompassing its in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, carbapenem-non-susceptible organisms, anaerobes, and other bacterial strains. Additionally, it evaluates evidence from clinical studies to establish its clinical effect and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Eravacycline, a synthetic fluorocycline, belongs to the tetracyclines class. Similar to other tetracycline, eravacycline exerts its antibacterial action by reversibly binding to the bacterial ribosomal 30S subunit. Eravacycline demonstrates potent in vitro activity against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes, and multidrug-resistant organisms. Randomized controlled trials and its associated meta-analysis affirm eravacycline's efficacy in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections. Moreover, real-world studies showcase eravacycline's adaptability and effectiveness in diverse clinical conditions, emphasizing its utility beyond labeled indications. Despite common gastrointestinal adverse events, eravacycline maintains an overall favorable safety profile, reinforcing its status as a tolerable antibiotic. However, ongoing research is essential for refining eravacycline's role, exploring combination therapy, and assessing its performance against biofilms, in combating challenging bacterial infections.

Susceptibility of gram-negative isolates collected in Taiwan to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents - SMART 2018-2021

BACKGROUND

Imipenem/relebactam (IMR) was approved for patient use in Taiwan in 2023. We evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of recent Gram-negative pathogens collected in Taiwan hospitals to IMR and comparators with a focus on carbapenem-resistant and KPC-carrying non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA).

METHODS

From 2018 to 2021, eight hospitals in Taiwan each collected up to 250 consecutive, aerobic or facultative, Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract, and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution. Most isolates that were IMR-, imipenem-, or ceftolozane/tazobactam-nonsusceptible were screened for β-lactamase genes by PCR or whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight percent of NME (n = 5063) and 94% of P. aeruginosa (n = 1518) isolates were IMR-susceptible. Percent susceptible values for non-carbapenem β-lactam comparators, including piperacillin/tazobactam, were 68-79% for NME isolates, while percent susceptible values for all β-lactam comparators, including meropenem, were 73-81% for P. aeruginosa. IMR retained activity against 93% of multidrug-resistant (MDR) NME and 70% of MDR P. aeruginosa. Sixty-five percent of carbapenem-resistant NME and 81% of KPC-positive NME (n = 80) were IMR-susceptible. IMR inhibited 70% of CRPA (n = 287). Fifty percent of IMR-nonsusceptible NME tested for β-lactamase carriage had an MBL or OXA-48-like enzyme, whereas most (95%) IMR-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa examined did not carry acquired β-lactamase genes.

CONCLUSION

Based on our in vitro data, IMR may be a useful option for the treatment of hospitalized patients in Taiwan with infections caused by common Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant NME, KPC-positive NME, and CRPA.

Comparison of the inoculum effect of in vitro antibacterial activity of Imipenem/relebactam and Ceftazidime/avibactam against ESBL-, KPC- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effect of inoculum size of extended-spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing-, AmpC-producing-, and KPC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae on the in vitro antibacterial effects of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA).

METHODS

We compared the impact of inoculum size on IMR and CZA of sixteen clinical isolates and three standard isolates through antimicrobial susceptibility tests, time-kill assays and in vitro PK/PD studies.

RESULTS

When inoculum size increased from 105 to 107 CFU/mL, an inoculum effect was observed for 26.3% (5/19) and 52.6% (10/19) of IMR and CZA, respectively; time-kill assays revealed that the concentration of CZA increased from ≥ 4 × MIC to 16 × MIC to reach 99.9% killing rate against K. pneumoniae ATCC-BAA 1705 (KPC-2-, OXA-9- and SHV-182-producing) and 60,700 (SHV-27- and DHA-1-producing). While for IMR, a concentration from 1 × MIC to 4 × MIC killed 99.9% of the four strains. When the inoculum size increased to 109 CFU/mL, neither IMR nor CZA showed a detectable antibacterial effect, even at a high concentration. An in vitro PK/PD study revealed a clear bactericidal effect when IMR administered as 1.25 g q6h when inoculum size increased.

CONCLUSION

An inoculum effect on CZA was observed more frequent than that on IMR. Among the β-lactamase-producing strains, the inoculum effect was most common for SHV-producing and KPC-producing strains.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

Results

The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%).

Conclusions

The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam alone or in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Nosocomial infection caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-A. baumannii) has become a challenge in clinical practice. Acting as the last resort antibacterial agents for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, polymyxins have high risk of nephrotoxicity and poor clinical efficacy. Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are three β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination complexes that newly approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection. In this study, we analyzed the in vitro activity of those novel antibacterial agents alone or in combination with polymyxin B against the CR-A. baumannii obtained from a Chinese tertiary hospital. Our results suggest that those novel antibacterial agents should not be used alone for the treatment of CR-A. baumannii infection, as they cannot prevent the regrowth of bacteria at the clinical achievable blood concentration. Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam should not be used as the substitutes of imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, since they have no edge over imipenem and meropenem on antibacterial activity when in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be more suitable than ceftazidime for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B, and the antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam is much higher than that of ceftazidime when tested in combination with polymyxin B. Ceftazidime/avibactam may also be the better choice than imipenem and meropenem for polymyxin B based combination therapy against CR-A. baumannii, as it has a higher synergistic rate with polymyxin B.

In vitro susceptibility of common Enterobacterales to eravacycline in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

New tetracycline derivatives exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. This study aimed to assess the in vitro activity of eravacycline against common Enterobacterales.

METHODS

Clinical Enterobacterales isolates were collected between 2017 and 2021. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using a broth microdilution test.

RESULTS

We identified Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 300), Escherichia coli (n = 300), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 100), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 100), Citrobacter freundii (n = 100), and Proteus mirabilis (n = 100). All P. mirabilis strains were resistant to eravacycline. Excluding P. mirabilis, the susceptibility rates to eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline were 75.2%, 66.9%, and 73%, respectively. The MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ (mg/L) of eravacycline were 0.5 and 4 for K. pneumoniae, 0.5 and 1 for E. coli, 0.5 and 1 for K. oxytoca, 0.5 and 2 for E. cloacae complex, and 0.25 and 1 for C. freundii. In cefotaxime non-susceptible and meropenem susceptible Enterobacterales, excluding P. mirabilis, the susceptibility rates of eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline were 69.7%, 57.1%, and 66.2%. We found decreased susceptibility rates of three new tetracycline derivatives against meropenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales (eravacycline: 47.1%, omadacycline: 39.4%, and tigecycline: 39.4%). Eravacycline showed a high susceptibility rate against cefotaxime non-susceptible and meropenem susceptible K. oxytoca (100%), C. freundii (93.2%), E. coli (85.9%), and meropenem non-susceptible E. coli (100%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides the MIC and susceptibility rate of eravacycline for common Enterobacterales. Eravacycline could be a therapeutic choice for cefotaxime non-susceptible or meropenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales, especially K. oxytoca, C. freundii, and E. coli.

Geographic patterns of Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem resistance in the Asia-Pacific Region: results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2012-2019

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the geographic distribution of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) isolates in the Asia-Pacific region.

METHODS

We collected A. baumannii isolates using the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program from 2012 to 2019. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method. The major carbapenemase genes were identified using multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays for the isolates collected between 2012 and 2014. CR-AB was defined as isolates with meropenem MICs ≥8 mg/l.

RESULTS

In total, 2674 A. baumannii isolates were collected from 13 countries, of which 1918 (71.7%) were CR-AB. The carbapenem resistance rates among A. baumannii isolates were as low as 2.8% and 6.5% in Japan and Australia, respectively, but as high as 88% and 87.2% in South Korea and India, respectively. Of the 232 CR-AB isolates that underwent carbapenemase gene screening, 224 (96.6%) harbored at least one carbapenemase gene. A total of 226 carbapenemase genes were detected, with bla_OXA-23 (94.7%, 214/226) being the most dominant, followed by bla_OXA-72 (2.7%, 6/226), bla_OXA-58 (2.2%, 5/226), and bla_NDM-1 (0.4%, 1/226). CR-AB isolates had >80% resistance to amikacin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The rates of CR-AB resistance to minocycline and colistin were 7.2% (31/429) and 1.7% (23/1368). For cefoperazone/sulbactam and tigecycline, 50.2% (527/1049) and 93.3% (1789/1918) of CR-AB isolates had an MIC ≤16 mg/l and ≤2 mg/l, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii showed significant differences among countries in the Asia-Pacific region, and the treatment options were limited.

Geographic patterns of carbapenem-resistant, multi-drug-resistant and difficult-to-treat Acinetobacter baumannii in the Asia-Pacific region: results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2020

This study evaluated the in-vitro activity of multiple classes of antibiotics, including novel β-lactam combination agents, tigecycline and colistin, against carbapenem-resistant (CRAB), multi-drug-resistant (MDRAB) and difficult-to-treat (DTRAB) Acinetobacter baumannii. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method. Susceptibility profiles and the distribution of selected antimicrobials among countries were illustrated and examined based on the breakpoints of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and the US Food and Drug Administration. In total, 847 A. baumannii isolates were evaluated, and 692 isolates were characterized as CRAB, MDRAB or DTRAB. The prevalence of drug-resistant A. baumannii was >70.0% in South Korea, India and China, while the resistance rate of tigecycline was <5.5%. The MICs of meropenem and meropenem/vaborbactam for drug-resistant A. baumannii were equal (both MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 32 mg/L, range 0.25-32 mg/L). The overall resistance rate remained high for multiple classes of antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, quinolones and aminoglycosides (>84.0%, >96.0%, >98.0%, >88.0% and >87.0%, respectively), but not colistin or tigecycline (1.1% and 4.3%, respectively). China showed the lowest susceptibility to tigecycline for drug-resistant A. baumannii isolates compared with other countries. In conclusion, the resistance rate of drug-resistant A. baumannii remains high against multiple classes of antimicrobials. Colistin was the most potent agent, followed by tigecycline. The geographic pattern of tigecycline-resistant A. baumannii varied among countries. Therefore, continuous surveillance of A. baumannii resistance profiles in different regions is required.

Comparative in vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant isolates of K. pneumoniae

Introduction. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are characterized by the World Health Organization as pathogens for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Omadacycline and eravacycline are two novel antibacterials within the tetracycline class.

Gap Statement. There are limited data regarding the comparison of the activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against K. pneumoniae isolates with different antimicrobial susceptibility profiles.

Aim. Our objective was to compare the in vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against a collection of K. pneumoniae isolates, including non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant strains.

Methodology. Ninety-four K. pneumoniae isolates, including 30 non-ESBL-producing, 30 ESBL-producing and 34 carbapenem-resistant (22 carrying bla OXA-48, 12 carrying bla NDM) strains were included in the study. ESBL and carbapenemase genes were detected by conventional PCR. Omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline MICs were determined by the gradient diffusion method and interpreted using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-defined breakpoints.

Results. Overall, the percentage of tigecycline-susceptible strains (97.9 %) was higher than the percentage of omadacyline-susceptible (75.5 %) and eravacycline-susceptible (72.3 %) strains. The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rates were 83.3 % among non-ESBL-producing isolates and 66.7 % among ESBL-producing isolates. The most common ESBL gene detected was blaCTX -M (90 %), followed by bla TEM (50 %) and bla SHV (50 %). The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rate among isolates carrying bla TEM was 33.3 %, whereas it was 100 % among isolates that do not carry bla TEM. The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rates among carbapenem-resistant isolates were 76.5 and 67.6 %, respectively. The omadacycline susceptibility rates among bla OXA-48-positive and bla NDM-positive isolates were 77.3 and 75.0 %, respectively. The eravacycline susceptibility rates among bla OXA-48-positive and bla NDM-positive isolates were 68.2 and 66.7 %, respectively. One carbapenem-resistant isolate was intermediate and one ESBL-producing isolate was resistant to tigecycline.

Conclusion. Overall, tigecycline was the most active tetracycline against isolates. Omadacycline and eravacycline showed excellent activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates that do not carry bla TEM. Omadacycline showed reasonable activity against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates carrying bla OXA-48 or bla NDM.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Imipenem-Relebactam

Imipenem (IMI)/cilastatin/relebactam (REL) (I/R) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with expanded microbiologic activity against carbapenem-resistant non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (CR-NME) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Relebactam, a bicyclic diazabicyclooctane, has no direct antimicrobial activity but provides reliable inhibition of many Ambler class A and class C enzymes. It is currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) and those with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) when limited or no alternative treatments are available. Given the number of recently approved β-lactams with expanded activity against highly resistant Gram-negative pathogens, this review summarizes the published literature on I/R, with a focus on its similar and distinguishing characteristics relative to those of other recently approved agents. Overall, available data support its use for the treatment of patients with HABP/VABP, cUTI, and cIAI due to CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa. Data indicate that I/R retains some activity against CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa isolates that are resistant to the newer β-lactams and vice versa, suggesting that susceptibility testing be performed for all the newer agents to determine optimal treatment options for patients with CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa infections. Further comparative PK/PD and clinical studies are warranted to determine the optimal role of I/R, alone and in combination, for the treatment of patients with highly resistant Gram-negative infections. Until further data are available, I/R is a potential treatment for patients with CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa infections when the benefits outweigh the risks.

Diminished Susceptibility to Cefoperazone/Sulbactam and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Enterobacteriaceae Due to Narrow-Spectrum β-Lactamases as Well as Omp Mutation

Cefoperazone/sulbactam (CSL) and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) are commonly used in clinical practice in China because of their excellent antimicrobial activity. CSL and TZP-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae are typically resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone (CRO). However, 11 nonrepetitive Enterobacteriaceae strains, which were resistant to CSL and TZP yet susceptible to CRO, were collected from January to December 2020. Antibiotic susceptibility tests and whole-genome sequencing were conducted to elucidate the mechanism for this rare phenotype. Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that all isolates were amoxicillin/clavulanic-acid resistant and sensitive to ceftazidime, cefepime, cefepime/tazobactam, cefepime/zidebactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam. Whole-genome sequencing revealed three of seven Klebsiella pneumoniae strains harbored bla _SHV-1 only, and four harbored bla _SHV-1 and bla _TEM-1B. Two Escherichia coli strains carried bla _TEM-1B only, while two Klebsiella oxytoca isolates harbored bla _OXY-1-3 and bla _OXY-1-1, respectively. No mutation in the β-lactamase gene and promoter sequence was found. Outer membrane protein (Omp) gene detection revealed that numerous missense mutations of OmpK36 and OmpK37 were found in all strains of K. pneumoniae. Numerous missense mutations of OmpK36 and OmpK35 and OmpK37 deficiency were found in one K. oxytoca strain, and no OmpK gene was found in the other. No Omp mutations were found in E. coli isolates. These results indicated that narrow spectrum β-lactamases, TEM-1, SHV-1, and OXY-1, alone or in combination with Omp mutation, contributed to the resistance to CSL and TZP in CRO-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic susceptibility tests Antibiotics Breakpoint, (μg/ml) Klebsiella pneumoniae Escherichia cou Klebriehd axyoca E1 E3 E4 E7 E9 E10 E11 E6 E8 E2 E5 CRO ≤1≥4 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 1 ≤0.5 1 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 1 1 CAZ 4 ≥16 1 2 1 4 4 4 4 2 4 1 1 FEP ≤2 216 1 1 0.25 1 2 2 2 0.5 2 1 1 AMC ≤8 ≥32 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 ≥128 CSL ≤16 ≥64 64 64 64 64 ≥128 128 ≥128 64 128 128 ≥128 TZP ≤16 ≥128 ≥256 ≥256 ≥256 ≥256 2256 2256 ≥256 ≥256 ≥256 ≥256 ≥256 FPT ≤2 ≥16 1 0.5 0.06 0.125 2 1 2 0.25 1 0.125 0.25 FPZ ≤2 216 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.125 0.25 0.25 1 0.125 0.25 0.125 0.125 CZA ≤8 216 1 0.5 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.25 CZT ≤2 28 2 1 0.5 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 CROceftriaxone, CAZceftazidime, FEPcefepime, AMC:amoxicillin clavulanic-acid, CSLcefoperazone/sulbactam, TZP:piperadllin/tazobactam, FPT:cefepime tazobactam, FPZ:cefepime/zidebactam, CZA:ceftazidime/avibactam, CZTceftolozane/tazobactam Gene sequencing results Number Strain ST p-Lactamase gene Promoter sequence mutation Omp mutation El Kpn 45 blaSHV-1, blaTEM-lB none OmpK36, OmpK3 7 E3 Kpn 45 blaSHV-1, blaTEM-lB none OmpK36. OmpK3 7 E4 Kpn 2854 blaSHV-1 none OmpK36, OmpK3 7 E7 Kpn 2358 blaSHV-1 - blaTEM-lB none OmpK36, OmpK3 7 E9 Kpn 2358 blaSHV-1. blaTEM-lB none OmpK36. OmpK3 7 E10 Kpn 18 9 blaSHV-1 none OmpK36. OmpK3 7 Ell Kpn 45 blaSHV-1 none OmpK36, OmpK3 7 E6 Eco 88 blaTEM-lB none none ES Eco 409 blaTEM-1B none none E2 Kox 194 blaOXY-1-3 none OmpK36 mutations. OmpK35 and OmpK 37 deficiency E5 Kox 11 blaOXY-1-1 none no OmpK (OmpK3 5, OmpK36 and OmpK37) gene found.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (CRE; harboring mainly bla_KPC, bla_NDM, and bla_OXA-48-like genes), CR- or MDR/XDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (production of VIM, IMP, or NDM carbapenemases combined with porin alteration), and Acinetobacter baumannii complex (producing mainly OXA-23, OXA-58-like carbapenemases), have gradually worsened and become a major challenge to public health because of limited antibiotic choice and high case-fatality rates. Diverse MDR/XDR-GNB isolates have been predominantly cultured from inpatients and hospital equipment/settings, but CRE has also been identified in community settings and long-term care facilities. Several CRE outbreaks cost hospitals and healthcare institutions huge economic burdens for disinfection and containment of their disseminations. Parenteral polymyxin B/E has been observed to have a poor pharmacokinetic profile for the treatment of CR- and XDR-GNB. It has been determined that tigecycline is suitable for the treatment of bloodstream infections owing to GNB, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a last-resort antibiotic against GNB of Ambler class A/C/D enzyme-producers and a majority of CR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Furthermore, ceftolozane-tazobactam is shown to exhibit excellent in vitro activity against CR- and XDR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Several pharmaceuticals have devoted to exploring novel antibiotics to combat these troublesome XDR-GNBs. Nevertheless, only few antibiotics are shown to be effective in vitro against CR/XDR-A. baumannii complex isolates. In this era of antibiotic pipelines, strict implementation of antibiotic stewardship is as important as in-time isolation cohorts in limiting the spread of CR/XDR-GNB and alleviating the worsening trends of resistance.

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review

Urinary tract infections, including cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, are among the most common diagnoses prompting antibiotic prescribing. The rise in antimicrobial resistance over the past decades has led to the increasing challenge of urinary tract infections because of multidrug-resistant and "difficult-to-treat resistance" among Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy and medical microbiology are modernizing how these urinary tract infections are treated. Advances in pharmacotherapy have included not only the development and approval of novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and glycylcyclines, but also the re-examination of the potential role of legacy antibiotics, including older aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. Recent advances in medical microbiology allow phenotypic and molecular mechanism of resistance testing, and thus antibiotic prescribing can be tailored to the mechanism of resistance in the infecting pathogen. Here, we provide a narrative review on the clinical and pre-clinical studies of drugs that can be used for difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria, with a particular focus on data relevant to the urinary tract. We also offer a pragmatic framework for antibiotic selection when encountering urinary tract infections due to difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria based on the organism and its mechanism of resistance.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Emergence of ST39 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing VIM-1 and KPC-2

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) causes life-threatening hospital-acquired infections. KPC and VIM carbapenemase production is the main molecular mechanism for carbapenem resistance. The aim of the current study was the genetic characterization of four ST39 CRKP isolates simultaneously producing VIM-1 and KPC-2, obtained in a Greek tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed through VITEK 2. Multiplex PCR, multiplex lateral flow immunoassay, phenotypic tests and next generation sequencing were applied. The sequence reads were de novo assembled and annotated, while antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmids were identified using bioinformatics software. Genomic comparison and core genome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based phylogenetic analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

Three isolates were pandrug-resistant, and one was extensively drug-resistant; they all carried bla_VIM-1 and bla_KPC-2 genes and were assigned to ST39. Bla_VIM-1 was integrated in a class 1 integron. They all harboured many antimicrobial resistance genes and various plasmids. The mgrB gene of all isolates was disrupted by an insertion sequence (ISKpn14). Genome comparison and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolates were closely related.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this is the first report on detection of CRKP ST39 isolates simultaneously producing VIM-1 and KPC-2 in addition to colistin resistance. The knowledge of the clonal relatedness of the isolates can lead to the implementation of strict infection control measures absolutely needed to eliminate their spread.

New antibiotics for the treatment of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current literature on novel agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some novel agents have recently become available that are expected to replace classical polymyxins as the first-line options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant NF-GNB infections.

SUMMARY

In this narrative review, we provide a brief overview of the differential activity of various recently approved agents against NF-GNB most encountered in the daily clinical practice, as well as the results from phase-3 randomized clinical trials and large postapproval observational studies, with special focus on NF-GNB. Since resistance to novel agents has already been reported, the use of novel agents needs to be optimized, based on their differential activity (not only in terms of targeted bacteria, but also of resistance determinants), the local microbiological epidemiology, and the most updated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. Large real-life experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the optimal treatment of NF-GNB infections in the daily clinical practice.