In vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with newly developed β-lactamase inhibitors against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamases

Past, present, and future perspectives on aztreonam and avibactam

INTRODUCTION

Aztreonam is a monobactam antibiotic approved in 1986 to treat infections caused by aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, but, together with cephalosporins, lost clinical utility due to the emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and novel (serine) carbapenemases. Avibactam was the first in a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor class to effectively inhibit these enzymes. It has been approved in combination with ceftazidime to treat Gram-negative infections caused by bacteria that produce AmpC, ESBLs and serine carbapenemases, and with aztreonam to treat patients infected with metallo-β-lactamase-producing enteric bacteria. Combinations of avibactam with ceftazidime and/or aztreonam have been used successfully to treat enteric pathogens producing multiple classes of β-lactamases.

AREAS COVERED

Development of aztreonam, avibactam, and avibactam combinations are placed into a historical perspective, based on both preclinical and clinical data. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid) was used to identify relevant literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Avibactam combined with ceftazidime and aztreonam in either dual or triple combinations provides the opportunity to treat previously untreatable Gram-negative infections that produce multiple β-lactamases. Aztreonam combinations should be particularly attractive, due to stability to metallo-β-lactamase hydrolysis and its safety advantage in treating penicillin-allergic patients. Other inhibitor combinations in development may challenge these combinations.

In vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with relebactam against gram-negative pathogens producing various serine and metallo-β-lactamases

OBJECTIVES

Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens have become a significant global public health challenge due to limited treatment options. Pathogens producing metallo-β-lactamase are particularly problematic since they are not inhibited by conventional β-lactamase inhibitors. Herein, we assess the in vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with relebactam against a collection carbapenemase producing organisms, including strains producing both serine‑β-lactamase and IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase that are commonly encountered in Japan.

METHODS

A total of 119 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates were used in this study. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of aztreonam and imipenem alone and aztreonam/relebactam, aztreonam/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam combinations were determined by the broth microdilution method.

RESULTS

Aztreonam MICs were reduced in combination with relebactam for strains producing ESBL or AmpC in addition to IMP-type, NDM-type, GES-type or OXA-48 carbapenemases and for Stenotrophomonas spp. Additionally, aztreonam/relebactam combination MICs were significantly lower than MICs of aztreonam alone among IMP producers, NDM producers and Stenotrophomonas spp. Significant differences between aztreonam/relebactam and aztreonam MICs were also observed for strains of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp., many of which produced both metallo-β-lactamase and serine‑β-lactamase. The aztreonam/relebactam combination showed comparable to higher MICs compared with the aztreonam/avibactam combination.

CONCLUSION

The addition of relebactam has a potential to restore the activity of aztreonam against strains that produce metallo-β-lactamase and serine‑β-lactamase. The combination may have a role in the treatment of infections due to these strains in countries without access to ceftazidime-avibactam.

Simulated achievement rate of β-lactams/nacubactam treatment in humans using instantaneous MIC-based PK/PD analysis

BACKGROUND

Nacubactam (NAC), a new diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor, is being developed for use together with aztreonam (AZT) and cefepime (CFPM). However, the effective clinical dosages of AZT/NAC and CFPM/NAC have not yet been established. We have previously shown that free time above instantaneous MIC (fT > MICi) is a valuable pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic parameter for β-lactam (BL)/NAC in a mouse thigh infection model.

OBJECTIVES

This study simulated the fT > MICi (%) for AZT/NAC and CFPM/NAC against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) with different MIC in humans to estimate the clinical efficacy at practically achievable combination doses of AZT/NAC and CFPM/NAC.

METHODS

Using previously reported PK parameters of each drug in humans and chequerboard MIC data, we calculated the fT > MICi (%) for AZT/NAC and CFPM/NAC in 10 000 simulated patients to predict the percentages of target attainment of bacteriostatic and bactericidal efficacies at various combined doses.

RESULTS

The results predicted that both BL/NAC combinations could achieve 100% 2 log10-kill against CPE strains at the lowest combination dose (0.5 g/0.5 g q8h). Additionally, in MIC studies examining BLs/NAC at a 1:1 ratio, the dosage regimen for strains with MICcomb ≤ 1 mg/L was expected to offer 100% bactericidal efficacy (2 log10-kill) at 0.5 g/0.5 g q8h or higher doses. For strains with 1 mg/L < MICcomb ≤ 16 mg/L, BLs/NAC at a 2 g/2 g q8h was predicted to produce bactericidal efficacy (1 log10-kill). At MICcomb = 32 mg/L, some bacteriostatic effect was expected at high BL doses.

CONCLUSIONS

AZT/NAC and CFPM/NAC are bactericidal against CPE at practically achievable dosages.

In-vitro activity of newly-developed β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam in combination with anti-pseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics against AmpC-overproducing clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

PURPOSE

Overproduction of the intrinsic chromosomally-encoded AmpC β-lactamase is one of the main mechanisms responsible for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro activity of anti-pseudomonal β-lactam molecules associated with the recently-developed and commercially-available β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam, against P. aeruginosa isolates overproducing their AmpC.

METHODS

MIC values of ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane with or without β-lactam inhibitor were determined for 50 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. MIC breakpoints for resistance were retained at 8 mg/L for β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations containing ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem, while 4 mg/L was used for those containing imipenem and ceftolozane. The concentration of all β-lactamases inhibitors was fixed at 4 mg/L, except for vaborbactam (8 mg/L).

RESULTS

The rates of isolates not being resistant to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane were found at 12%, 22%, 34%, 8% and 74%, respectively. When combined with avibactam, those rates increased to 60%, 62%, 60%, 46%, and 80%, respectively. The highest rates were found with relebactam-based combinations, being 76%, 64%, 66%, 76% and 84%, respectively. By contrast, associations with vaborbactam did not lead to significantly increased "non-resistance" rates.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that all combinations including relebactam led to higher "non-resistance" rates against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. The best activity was achieved by combining ceftolozane and relebactam, that might therefore be considered as an excellent clinical alternative against AmpC overproducers.

The Challenge of Treating Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review

Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative organisms, in particular, require careful consideration due to their complexity and varied prevalence, given that the microbiological diagnosis of these pathogens is intricate and compounded by challenges in assessing the efficacy of anti-MBL antimicrobials. We discuss both established and new approaches in the treatment of MBL-producing Gram-negative infections, focusing on 3 strategies: colistin; the recently approved combination of aztreonam with avibactam (or with ceftazidime/avibactam); and cefiderocol. Despite its significant activity against various Gram-negative pathogens, the efficacy of colistin is limited by resistance mechanisms, while nephrotoxicity and acute renal injury call for careful dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. Aztreonam combined with avibactam (or with avibactam/ceftazidime if aztreonam plus avibactam is not available) exhibits potent activity against MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol in monotherapy is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant organisms, including MBL producers, and favorable clinical outcomes have been observed in various clinical trials and case series. After examining scientific evidence in the management of infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria, we have developed a comprehensive clinical algorithm to guide therapeutic decision making. We recommend reserving colistin as a last-resort option for MDR Gram-negative infections. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam represent favorable options against MBL-producing pathogens. In the case of P. aeruginosa with MBL-producing enzymes and with difficult-to-treat resistance, cefiderocol is the preferred option. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and minimize resistance.

Not all carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains are alike: tailoring antibiotic therapy based on resistance mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To correlate the resistance mechanisms and the susceptibility to new antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa .

RECENT FINDINGS

Definition of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is still debated. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) are used but which of them better correlate with the risk of mortality remains debated. Mechanisms underlying resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are complex and may be combined, resulting in unpredictable phenotype and cross-resistance. Thus, not all CRPA are alike and tailoring antibiotic therapy on resistance mechanisms is challenging.

SUMMARY

Current guidelines recommend the use of new antipseudomonal agents for CRPA or DTR-PA infections but they don't provide specific information on how tailoring antibiotic therapy on underlying resistance mechanisms. This review may be useful to understand which mechanisms are involved in CRPA and may have practical implications helping clinicians to select an appropriate antibiotic regimen. Several antibiotics are now available for Pseudomonas aeruginosa but their rational use is important to avoid development of future resistance. The knowledge of local epidemiology and most common resistance mechanisms may guide empirical therapy, but targeted antibiotic therapy should be re-evaluated as soon as susceptibility testing profile is available and selected according to Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenotype.

Relative inhibitory activities of newly developed diazabicyclooctanes, boronic acid derivatives, and penicillin-based sulfone β-lactamase inhibitors against broad-spectrum AmpC β-lactamases

The relative inhibitory activities of diazabicyclooctanes (avibactam, relebactam, zidebactam, nacubactam, durlobactam), boronic acid derivatives (vaborbactam, taniborbactam, xeruborbactam), and penicillin-based sulfone derivative enmetazobactam were evaluated against several intrinsic and acquired class C β-lactamases. By contrast to vaborbactam and enmetazobactam, taniborbactam, xeruborbactam, and all diazabicyclooctanes demonstrated effective activities against most AmpC enzymes. Notably, durlobactam exhibited the most pronounced inhibitory effect. Interstingly, the chromosomal AmpC of Acinetobacter baumannii was the least sensitive enzyme to the newly developed β-lactamase inhibitors.

Assessment of the activity and mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol and combinations of β-lactams and the novel β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, taniborbactam, zidebactam, nacubactam, xeruborbactam, and ANT3310 in emerging double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

We aimed to investigate the activity of and mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol and innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in a nationwide collection of double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. In all, 57 clinical isolates co-producing two carbapenemases collected from Spanish hospitals during the period 2017-2022 were analyzed. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, aztreonam/nacubactam, cefiderocol, cefepime, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/nacubactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam, and meropenem/ANT3310 were determined by reference broth microdilution. Genetic drivers of resistance were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The collection covered nine carbapenemase associations: VIM + OXA-48 (21/57), NDM + OXA-48 (11/57), KPC + VIM (10/57), KPC + OXA-48 (6/57), IMP + OXA-48 (3/57), NDM + KPC (2/57), NDM + VIM (2/57), NDM + GES (1/57), and KPC + IMP (1/57). Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam were the least active options. Aztreonam/avibactam and aztreonam/nacubactam were active against the whole collection and yielded MIC50/MIC90 values of ≤0.25/0.5 mg/L and 1/2 mg/L, respectively. Cefepime/zidebactam (56/57 susceptible), meropenem/xeruborbactam (56/57 susceptible), cefepime/nacubactam (55/57 susceptible), and cefiderocol (53/57 susceptible) were also highly active, with MIC50/MIC90 values ranging from ≤0.25-2 mg/L to 2-4 mg/L, respectively. Meropenem/ANT3310 (MIC50/MIC90 = 0.5/≥64 mg/L; 47/57 susceptible) and cefepime/taniborbactam (MIC50/MIC90 = 0.5/16 mg/L; 44/57 susceptible) also retained high levels of activity, although they were affected by NDM-type enzymes in combination with porin deficiency. Our findings highlight that cefiderocol and combinations of β-lactams and the novel β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam, zidebactam, xeruborbactam, and ANT3310 show promising activity against double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.

Navigating the Current Treatment Landscape of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Infections: What are the Limitations?

The spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative pathogens, especially those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), has become a major health concern. MBLs are molecularly the most diverse carbapenemases, produced by a wide spectrum of gram-negative organisms, including the Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and can hydrolyze most β-lactams using metal ion cofactors in their active sites. Over the years, the prevalence of MBL-carrying isolates has increased globally, particularly in Asia. MBL infections are associated with adverse clinical outcomes including longer length of hospital stay, ICU admission, and increased mortality across the globe. The optimal treatment for MBL infections not only depends on the pathogen but also on the underlying resistance mechanisms. Currently, there are only few drugs or drug combinations that can efficiently offset MBL-mediated resistance, which makes the treatment of MBL infections challenging. The rising concern of MBLs along with the limited treatment options has led to the need and development of drugs that are specifically targeted towards MBLs. This review discusses the prevalence of MBLs, their clinical impact, and the current treatment options for MBL infections and their limitations. Furthermore, this review will discuss agents currently in the pipeline for treatment of MBL infections.

Mediastinitis caused by an NDM-1 Escherichia coli in a child with Dacron Sano shunt after pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect surgery treated with combination of aztreonam-avibactam

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are being reported increasingly and cause nosocomial infections, which may include postoperative mediastinitis. This paper reports a case of postoperative mediastinitis caused by an Escherichia coli NDM-1 carbapenemase producer in a 13-month-old boy with DiGeorge syndrome. The infection was managed with surgical debridement and antibiotherapy with aztreonam, ceftazidime-avibactam and IV fosfomycin for 6 weeks. The evolution was favourable, without relapse over 10 weeks of follow-up.

Practical Application of Aztreonam-Avibactam as a Treatment Strategy for Ambler Class B Metallo-β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections are a considerable challenge for clinicians. In recent years, novel antibiotic options have resulted in a tremendous advance in medical therapy; however, current treatment options are primarily effective for resistance derived from serine-based carbapenemases. The Ambler class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) remain a critical challenge with decidedly fewer effective options. One intriguing option for these MBL pathogens is the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam with aztreonam. While clinical experience with this regimen is limited, in vitro studies are promising, and limited case reports describe success with this regimen; however, significant challenges preclude widespread adoption of this novel treatment regimen. A systemic literature review was performed to offer recommendations based on current evidence for a practical strategy on how to best integrate the use of aztreonam with avibactam combination therapy.

Sequential Treatment Failure With Aztreonam-Ceftazidime-Avibactam Followed by Cefiderocol Due to Preexisting and Acquired Mechanisms in a New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Causing Fatal Bloodstream Infection

We report a fatal case of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing Escherichia coli in a bacteremic patient with sequential failure of aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam followed by cefiderocol. Acquired resistance was documented phenotypically and mediated through preexisting and acquired mutations. This case highlights the need to rethink optimal treatment for NDM-producing organisms.

Relative inhibitory activities of the broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor xeruborbactam in comparison with taniborbactam against metallo-β-lactamases produced in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Xeruborbactam is a newly developed β-lactamase inhibitor designed for metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). This study assessed the relative inhibitory properties of this novel inhibitor in comparison with another MBL inhibitor, namely taniborbactam (TAN), against a wide range of acquired MBL produced either in Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. As observed with taniborbactam, the combination of xeruborbactam (XER) with β-lactams, namely, ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem, led to significantly decreased MIC values for a wide range of B1-type MBL-producing E. coli, including most recombinant strains producing NDM, VIM, IMP, GIM-1, and DIM-1 enzymes. Noteworthily, while TAN-based combinations significantly reduced MIC values of β-lactams for MBL-producing P. aeruginosa recombinant strains, those with XER were much less effective. We showed that this latter feature was related to the MexAB-OprM efflux pump significantly impacting MIC values when testing XER-based combinations in P. aeruginosa. The relative inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) were similar for XER and TAN against NDM and VIM enzymes. Noteworthily, XER was effective against NDM-9, NDM-30, VIM-83, and most of IMP enzymes, although those latter enzymes were considered resistant to TAN. However, no significant inhibition was observed with XER against IMP-10, SPM-1, and SIM-1 as well as the representative subclass B2 and B3 enzymes, PFM-1 and AIM-1. The determination of the constant inhibition (Ki) of XER revealed a much higher value against IMP-10 than against NDM-1, VIM-2, and IMP-1. Hence, IMP-10 that differs from IMP-1 by a single amino-acid substitution (Val67Phe) can, therefore, be considered resistant to XER.

Pseudomonasaeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, resistance mechanisms and international clonal lineages: update from ESGARS-ESCMID/ISARPAE Group

SCOPE

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a ubiquitous opportunistic pathogen considered one of the paradigms of antimicrobial resistance, is among the main causes of hospital-acquired and chronic infections associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This growing threat results from the extraordinary capacity of P. aeruginosa to develop antimicrobial resistance through chromosomal mutations, the increasing prevalence of transferable resistance determinants (such as the carbapenemases and the extended-spectrum β-lactamases), and the global expansion of epidemic lineages. The general objective of this initiative is to provide a comprehensive update of P. aeruginosa resistance mechanisms, especially for the extensively drug-resistant (XDR)/difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) international high-risk epidemic lineages, and how the recently approved β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations may affect resistance mechanisms and the definition of susceptibility profiles.

METHODS

To address this challenge, the European Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (ESGARS) from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases launched the 'Improving Surveillance of Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Europe (ISARPAE)' initiative in 2022, supported by the Joint programming initiative on antimicrobial resistance network call and included a panel of over 40 researchers from 18 European Countries. Thus, a ESGARS-ISARPAE position paper was designed and the final version agreed after four rounds of revision and discussion by all panel members.

QUESTIONS ADDRESSED IN THE POSITION PAPER

To provide an update on (a) the emerging resistance mechanisms to classical and novel anti-pseudomonal agents, with a particular focus on β-lactams, (b) the susceptibility profiles associated with the most relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms, (c) the impact of the novel agents and resistance mechanisms on the definitions of resistance profiles, and (d) the globally expanding XDR/DTR high-risk lineages and their association with transferable resistance mechanisms.

IMPLICATION

The evidence presented herein can be used for coordinated epidemiological surveillance and decision making at the European and global level.

Relative inhibitory activities of the broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam against metallo-β-lactamases

Taniborbactam (TAN) is a novel broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor with significant activity against subclass B1 metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Here, we showed that TAN exhibited an overall excellent activity against B1 MBLs including most NDM- and VIM-like as well as SPM-1, GIM-1, and DIM-1 enzymes, but not against SIM-1. Noteworthy, VIM-1-like enzymes (particularly VIM-83) were less inhibited by TAN than VIM-2-like. Like NDM-9, NDM-30 (also differing from NDM-1 by a single amino acid substitution) was resistant to TAN.

Reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam conferred by acquired AmpC-type β-lactamases in PBP3-modified Escherichia coli

PURPOSE

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are a growing threat, and very few therapeutic options remain active against those multidrug resistant bacteria. Aztreonam is the molecule of choice against metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) producers since it is not hydrolyzed by those enzymes, but the co-production of acquired plasmidic cephalosporinases or extended-spectrum β-lactamases leading to aztreonam resistance may reduce the efficacy of this molecule. Hence, the development of the aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) combination provides an interesting therapeutic alternative since avibactam inhibits the activity of both cephalosporinases and extended-spectrum β-lactamases. However, structural modifications of penicillin binding protein PBP3, the target of aztreonam, may lead to reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam.

METHODS

Here the impact of various plasmid-encoded AmpC-type β-lactamases (ACC-1, ACT-7, ACT-17, CMY-2, CMY-42, DHA-1, FOX-1, and FOX-5) on susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam was evaluated using isogenic E. coli MG1655 strains harboring insertions in PBP3 (YRIN and YRIK). The inhibitory activity of various β-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanic acid, tazobactam, avibactam, relebactam, and vaborbactam) were also compared against these enzymes.

RESULTS

Hence, we showed that reduced susceptibility to AZA was due to the combined effect of both AmpC production and amino acid insertions in PBP3. The highest resistance level was achieved in strains possessing the insertions in PBP3 in association with the production of ACT-7, ACC-1, or CMY-42.

CONCLUSION

Although none of the recombinant strains tested displayed clinical resistance to aztreonam-avibactam, our data emphasize that the occurrence of such profile might be of clinical relevance for MBL-producing strains.

Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a last resort option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria, especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CR Acinetobacter baumannii. Monitoring global levels of cefiderocol non-susceptibility (CFDC-NS) is important.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically collate and examine studies investigating in vitro CFDC-NS and estimate the global prevalence of CFDC-NS against major Gram-negative pathogens.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Scopus, up to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible were studies reporting CFDC-NS in Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates.

RISK-OF-BIAS ASSESSMENT

Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed the risk of bias on the population, setting, and measurement (susceptibility testing) domains.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Binomial-Normal mixed-effects models were applied to estimate CFDC-NS prevalence by species, coresistance phenotype, and breakpoint definition (EUCAST, CLSI, and FDA). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

In all, 78 studies reporting 82 035 clinical isolates were analysed (87% published between 2020 and 2023). CFDC-NS prevalence (EUCAST breakpoints) was low overall but varied by species (S. maltophilia 0.4% [95% CI 0.2-0.7%], Enterobacterales 3.0% [95% CI 1.5-6.0%], P. aeruginosa 1.4% [95% CI 0.5-4.0%]) and was highest for A. baumannii (8.8%, 95% CI 4.9-15.2%). CFDC-NS was much higher in CR Enterobacterales (12.4%, 95% CI 7.3-20.0%) and CR A. baumannii (13.2%, 95% CI 7.8-21.5%), but relatively low for CR P. aeruginosa (3.5%, 95% CI 1.6-7.8%). CFDC-NS was exceedingly high in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (38.8%, 95% CI 22.6-58.0%), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing A. baumannii (44.7%, 95% CI 34.5-55.4%), and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Enterobacterales (36.6%, 95% CI 22.7-53.1%). CFDC-NS varied considerably with breakpoint definition, predominantly among CR bacteria. Additional sources of heterogeneity were single-centre investigations and geographical regions.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC-NS prevalence is low overall, but alarmingly high for specific CR phenotypes circulating in some institutions or regions. Continuous surveillance and updating of global CFDC-NS estimates are imperative while cefiderocol is increasingly introduced into clinical practice. The need to harmonize EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints was evident.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol: which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the different present and future therapeutic β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) alternatives, namely aztreonam-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and sulbactam-durlobactam against clinical isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-nacubactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were determined for 67, 9, and 11 clinical Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii isolates, respectively, showing MIC values of cefiderocol being ≥1 mg/L. If unavailable, the respective β-lactam breakpoints according to EUCAST were used for BL/BLI combinations.

RESULTS

For Enterobacterales, the susceptibility rates for aztreonam, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 7.5%, 0%, 10.4%, and 10.4%, respectively, while they were much higher for cefepime-zidebactam (91%), cefiderocol-zidebactam (91%), meropenem-nacubactam (71.6%), cefiderocol-nacubactam (74.6%), and cefiderocol-taniborbactam (76.1%), as expected. For P. aeruginosa isolates, the higher susceptibility rates were observed for imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol-zidebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam (56% for all combinations). For A. baumannii isolates, lower susceptibility rates were observed with commercially or under development BL/BLI combos; however, a high susceptibility rate (70%) was found for sulbactam-durlobactam and when cefiderocol was associated to some BLIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Zidebactam- and nacubactam-containing combinations showed a significant in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol. On the other hand, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam showed the highest susceptibility rates against P. aeruginosa isolates. Finally, sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combined with a BLI were the only effective options against A. baumannii tested isolates.

Impact of acquired broad-spectrum β-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) alone or in combination with avibactam and taniborbactam β-lactamase inhibitors in Escherichia coli

The impact of β-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) and other carbapenem molecules was evaluated in Escherichia coli, alone and in combination with avibactam or taniborbactam β-lactamase inhibitors. Tebipenem and sulopenem exhibited a similar spectrum of activity compared to the intravenous carbapenems and displayed lower MIC values than ceftibuten-avibactam against E. coli producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases or AmpC enzymes. Combined with taniborbactam, tebipenem and sulopenem exhibited low MIC values against almost all tested recombinant E. coli, including metallo-β-lactamase producers.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam combinations against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Switzerland

Carbapenemase-producing in Enterobacterales (CPE) represent a critical health concern worldwide, including in Switzerland, leading to very limited therapeutic options. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the susceptibility to the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam of CPE isolates recovered in Switzerland from 2018 to 2020. A total of 150 clinical CPE were studied including mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 61, 40.3%) and Escherichia coli (n = 53, 35.3%). The distribution of carbapenemases was as follows: KPC-like (32%), OXA-48-like (32%), NDM-like (24%), combinations of carbapenemases (10%), VIM-1 producers (n = 2), and a single IMI-1 producer. Overall, 77% of the strains were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam, 63% was susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, and 62% susceptible to imipenem-relebactam. Those data may contribute to optimize the choice of first line therapy for treating infections due to CPE.

#AMRrounds: a systematic educational approach for navigating bench to bedside antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to serve as a major global health crisis. Clinicians practising in this modern era are faced with ongoing challenges in the therapeutic management of patients suffering from antimicrobial-resistant infections. A strong educational understanding and synergistic application of clinical microbiology, infectious disease and pharmacological concepts can assist the adventuring clinician in the navigation of such cases. Important items include mobilizing laboratory testing for pathogen identification and susceptibility data, harnessing an understanding of intrinsic pathogen resistance, acknowledging epidemiological resistance trends, recognizing acquired AMR mechanisms, and consolidating these considerations when constructing an ideal pharmacological plan. In this article, we outline a novel framework by which to systematically approach clinical AMR, encourage AMR-related education and optimize therapeutic decision-making in AMR-related illnesses.

Case Commentary: When Voldemort Meets Sauron: Treatment Considerations for Emerging Dual-Carbapenemase-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are difficult to treat due to limited effective treatment options. In this issue, a patient with a corneal infection caused by a Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM)- and Guiana extended-spectrum β-lactamase (GES)-coproducing P. aeruginosa strain associated with the recent artificial tears-related outbreak in the United States is described. This resistance genotype/phenotype further compromises therapeutic options, and this report provides insights into diagnostic and treatment approaches for clinicians dealing with infections due to this highly resistant P. aeruginosa.

Impact of Acquired Broad Spectrum β-Lactamases on Susceptibility to Novel Combinations Made of β-Lactams (Aztreonam, Cefepime, Meropenem, and Imipenem) and Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The impact of broad-spectrum β-lactamases on the susceptibility to novel β-lactamase/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations was evaluated both in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli using isogenic backgrounds. Cefepime-zidebactam displayed low MICs, mainly due to the significant intrinsic antibacterial activity of zidebactam. Cefepime-taniborbactam showed excellent activity against recombinant E. coli strains, including metallo-β-lactamase producers, whereas aztreonam-avibactam remained the best therapeutic option against class B β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.

In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Cefiderocol and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Cefiderocol and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) both had activity against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, including those that produce metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). We compared the in vitro activities and inoculum effects of these antibiotics against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), especially MBL-producing isolates. The MICs of cefiderocol and ATM-AVI were determined using broth microdilution method for a 2016 to 2021 collection of Enterobacteriaceae isolates which produced MBL, KPC, or OXA-48-like carbapenemases. MICs with high bacteria inoculum were also evaluated for susceptible isolates. A total of 195 CPE were tested, including 143 MBL- (74 NDM, 42 IMP, and 27 VIM), 38 KPC-, and 14 OXA-48-like-producing isolates. The susceptible rates of MBL-, KPC-, and OXA-48-like producers to cefiderocol were 86.0%, 92.1%, and 92.9%, respectively, and that to ATM-AVI were 95.8%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. NDM producers displayed lower susceptibility and higher MIC50s/MIC90s of cefiderocol (78.4%, 2/16 mg/L) than IMP (92.9%, 0.375/4 mg/L) and VIM (96.3%, 1/4 mg/L) producers. NDM- and VIM-producing Escherichia coli showed lower susceptibility to ATM-AVI (77.3% and 75.0%, respectively) compared to MBL-CPE of other species (100% susceptible). Inoculum effects for cefiderocol and ATM-AVI were observed among 95.9% and 95.2% of susceptible CPE, respectively. A switch from susceptible to resistant category was observed in 83.6% (143/171) of isolates for cefiderocol and 94.7% (179/189) for ATM-AVI. Our results revealed that NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae had lower susceptibility to cefiderocol and ATM-AVI. Prominent inoculum effects on both antibiotics were observed for CPE, which suggested a risk of microbiological failure when they were used for CPE infections with high bacteria burden. IMPORTANCE The prevalence of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasing worldwide. Currently, therapeutic options for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae remain limited. We demonstrated that clinical metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates were highly susceptible to cefiderocol (86.0%) and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) (95.8%). However, inoculum effects on cefiderocol and ATM-AVI were observed for over 90% of susceptible carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates. Our findings highlight a potential risk of microbiological failure when using monotherapy with cefiderocol or ATM-AVI to treat severe CPE infection.