1
|
Hoang U, Button E, Armstrong M, Okusi C, Ellis J, Zambon M, Anand S, Delanerolle G, Hobbs FDR, van Summeren J, Paget J, de Lusignan S. Assessing the Clinical and Socioeconomic Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Children Aged Under 5 Years in Primary Care: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study in England and Report on the Adaptations of the Study to the COVID-19 Pandemic. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38026. [PMID: 35960819 PMCID: PMC9415952 DOI: 10.2196/38026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) commonly causes lower respiratory tract infections and hospitalization in children. In 2019-2020, the Europe-wide RSV ComNet standardized study protocol was developed to measure the clinical and socioeconomic disease burden of RSV infections among children aged <5 years in primary care. RSV has a recognized seasonality in England. Objective We aimed to describe (1) the adaptations of the RSV ComNet standardized study protocol for England and (2) the challenges of conducting the study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This study was conducted by the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre—the English national primary care sentinel network. We invited all (N=248) general practices within the network that undertook virology sampling to participate in the study by recruiting eligible patients (registered population: n=3,056,583). Children aged <5 years with the following case definition of RSV infection were included in the study: those consulting a health care practitioner in primary care with symptoms meeting the World Health Organization’s definition of acute respiratory illness or influenza-like illness who have laboratory-confirmed RSV infection. The parents/guardians of these cases were asked to complete 2 previously validated questionnaires (14 and 30 days postsampling). A sample size of at least 100 RSV-positive cases is required to estimate the percentage of children that consult in primary care who need hospitalization. Assuming a swab positivity rate of 20% in children aged <5 years, we estimated that 500 swabs are required. We adapted our method for the pandemic by extending sampling planned for winter 2020-2021 to a rolling data collection, allowing verbal consent and introducing home swabbing because of increased web-based consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The preliminary results of the data collection between International Organization for Standardization (ISO) weeks 1-41 in 2021 are described. There was no RSV detected in the winter of 2020-2021 through the study. The first positive RSV swab collected through the sentinel network in England was collected in ISO week 17 and then every week since ISO week 25. In total, 16 (N=248, 6.5%) of the virology-sampling practices volunteered to participate; these were high-sampling practices collecting the majority of eligible swabs across the sentinel network—200 (43.8%) out of 457 swabs, of which 54 (N=200, 27%) were positive for RSV. Conclusions Measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic meant there was no circulating RSV last winter; however, RSV has circulated out of season, as detected by the sentinel network. The sentinel network practices have collected 40% (200/500) of the required samples, and 27% (54/200) were RSV positive. We have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a European-standardized RSV disease burden study protocol in England during a pandemic, and we now need to recruit to this adapted protocol. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/38026
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uy Hoang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Button
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Cecilia Okusi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Ellis
- Reference Microbiology Services, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Zambon
- Reference Microbiology Services, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sneha Anand
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - F D Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - John Paget
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boikos C, Caya C, Doll MK, Kraicer-Melamed H, Dolph M, Delisle G, Winters N, Gore G, Quach C. Safety and effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in situations of pandemic and/or novel/variant influenza: a systematic review of the literature, 2009-15. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72:1556-1573. [PMID: 28204554 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To review systematically the published literature evaluating neuraminidase inhibitor (NI) safety and effectiveness in situations of pandemic and novel/variant influenza. Methods We searched six online databases using comprehensive search criteria for observational studies and randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of NI treatment, prophylaxis or outbreak control in patients of all ages. Results Overall, 165 studies were included (95% observational), which were generally of low methodological quality due to lack of adjustment for confounding variables. In studies reporting adjusted estimates in general populations, NI treatment appeared likely to be effective against mortality (primarily if administered within 48 h of symptom onset) and potentially effective in reducing pneumonia. NIs appeared effective in reducing secondary transmission when indicated for prophylaxis. Limited, low-quality data suggest NIs are likely safe in general populations and may be safe in pregnant women and children. Data are scarce regarding safety of NIs in adults and high-risk individuals. Conclusions Most included studies were observational, statistically underpowered and at high risk of reporting biased and/or confounded effect estimates. NI treatment appeared likely effective in reducing mortality (cause unspecified) and pneumonia in general populations, with increasing benefit when administered with 48 h of symptom onset. NI pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis is likely effective in reducing secondary transmission of influenza in a general population. Our evidence suggests NIs are likely safe to use in the general population; however, data for children and pregnant women are limited. Knowledge gaps persist in specific populations such as Aboriginals, high-risk individuals and the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Boikos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - C Caya
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - M K Doll
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - H Kraicer-Melamed
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - M Dolph
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - N Winters
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - G Gore
- Life Sciences Library, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - C Quach
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Microbiology, Infectious Disease, and Immunology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson MG, Ferber JR, Odouli R, David D, Shifflett P, Meece JK, Naleway AL, Bozeman S, Spencer SM, Fry AM, Li DK. Results of a pilot study using self-collected mid-turbinate nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection among pregnant women. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2016; 9:155-60. [PMID: 25711978 PMCID: PMC4415700 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the feasibility of asking pregnant women to self-collect and ship respiratory specimens. Methods In a preliminary laboratory study, we compared the RT-PCR cycle threshold (CT) values of influenza A and B viruses incubated at 4 storage temperatures (from 4 to 35°C) for 6 time periods (8, 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours and 30 days), resulting in 24 conditions that were compared to an aliquot tested after standard freezing (−20°C) (baseline condition). In a subsequent pilot study, during January–February, 2014, we delivered respiratory specimen collection kits to 53 pregnant women with a medically attended acute respiratory illness using three delivery methods. Results CT values were stable after storage at temperatures <27°C for up to 72 hours for influenza A viruses and 48 hours for influenza B viruses. Of 53 women who received kits during the pilot, 89% collected and shipped nasal swabs as requested. However, 30% (14/47) of the women took over 2 days to collect and ship their specimen. The human control gene, ribonuclease P (RNase P), was detected in 100% of nasal swab specimens. However, the mean CT values for RNase P (26·5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 26·0–27·1) and for the 8 influenza A virus positives in our pilot (32·2, 95% CI = 28·9–35·5) were significantly higher than the CTs observed in our 2010–2012 study using staff-collected nasal pharyngeal swabs (P-values < 0·01). Discussion Self-collection of respiratory specimens is a promising research method, but further research is needed to quantify the sensitivity and specificity of the approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hayward AC, Fragaszy EB, Bermingham A, Wang L, Copas A, Edmunds WJ, Ferguson N, Goonetilleke N, Harvey G, Kovar J, Lim MSC, McMichael A, Millett ERC, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Nazareth I, Pebody R, Tabassum F, Watson JM, Wurie FB, Johnson AM, Zambon M. Comparative community burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic influenza: results of the Flu Watch cohort study. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2014; 2:445-54. [PMID: 24717637 PMCID: PMC7164821 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70034-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 290] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of the effect of influenza on populations, including risk of infection, illness if infected, illness severity, and consultation rates, is essential to inform future control and prevention. We aimed to compare the community burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic influenza across different age groups and study years and gain insight into the extent to which traditional surveillance underestimates this burden. METHODS Using preseason and postseason serology, weekly illness reporting, and RT-PCR identification of influenza from nasal swabs, we tracked the course of seasonal and pandemic influenza over five successive cohorts (England 2006-11; 5448 person-seasons' follow-up). We compared burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic strains. We weighted analyses to the age and regional structure of England to give nationally representative estimates. We compared symptom profiles over the first week of illness for different strains of PCR-confirmed influenza and non-influenza viruses using ordinal logistic regression with symptom severity grade as the outcome variable. FINDINGS Based on four-fold titre rises in strain-specific serology, on average influenza infected 18% (95% CI 16-22) of unvaccinated people each winter. Of those infected there were 69 respiratory illnesses per 100 person-influenza-seasons compared with 44 per 100 in those not infected with influenza. The age-adjusted attributable rate of illness if infected was 23 illnesses per 100 person-seasons (13-34), suggesting most influenza infections are asymptomatic. 25% (18-35) of all people with serologically confirmed infections had PCR-confirmed disease. 17% (10-26) of people with PCR-confirmed influenza had medically attended illness. These figures did not differ significantly when comparing pandemic with seasonal influenza. Of PCR-confirmed cases, people infected with the 2009 pandemic strain had markedly less severe symptoms than those infected with seasonal H3N2. INTERPRETATION Seasonal influenza and the 2009 pandemic strain were characterised by similar high rates of mainly asymptomatic infection with most symptomatic cases self-managing without medical consultation. In the community the 2009 pandemic strain caused milder symptoms than seasonal H3N2. FUNDING Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C Hayward
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Ellen B Fragaszy
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Lili Wang
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Copas
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - W John Edmunds
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Neil Ferguson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nilu Goonetilleke
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gabrielle Harvey
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jana Kovar
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Megan S C Lim
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew McMichael
- Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth R C Millett
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam
- Health Protection and Influenza Research Group, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- UCL Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Pebody
- Respiratory Diseases Department, Public Health England, Colindale, UK
| | - Faiza Tabassum
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - John M Watson
- Respiratory Diseases Department, Public Health England, Colindale, UK
| | - Fatima B Wurie
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anne M Johnson
- UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Zambon
- Respiratory Virus Unit, Public Health England, Colindale, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berera D, Zambon M. Antivirals in the 2009 pandemic--lessons and implications for future strategies. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2014; 7 Suppl 3:72-9. [PMID: 24215385 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization's declaration of an imminent swine-origin influenza A pandemic in April 2009 triggered the global launch of national pandemic preparedness plans. An integral component of pandemic preparedness in many countries was the targeted use of antiviral therapy for containment, disease mitigation, and treatment. The 2009 pandemic marked the first pandemic during which influenza antivirals were available for global use. Although most national pandemic plans included provisions for antiviral treatment, these pre-determined protocols required frequent updating as more information became available about the virus, and its susceptibility to antiviral agents, the epidemiology of infection, and the population groups that were most susceptible to severe disease. National public health agencies in countries with both plans for use of antivirals and pre-existing stockpiles, including those in Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, operated distinctly different antiviral distribution and treatment programs from one another. In the 3 years following the pandemic, there is still little comparison of the diversity of national antiviral treatment policies and drug distribution mechanisms that were implemented, whether they had any mitigating effects and which might be most efficient. The purpose of this study is to outline roles of antiviral medicines in a pandemic period, provide insights into the diversity of antiviral treatment and distribution policies applied by selected countries between April 2009-July 2010, and to stimulate discussion on whether these policies remain appropriate for implementation in future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeva Berera
- Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rutter P, Mytton O, Ellis B, Donaldson L. Access to the NHS by telephone and Internet during an influenza pandemic: an observational study. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e004174. [PMID: 24491382 PMCID: PMC3918981 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Revised: 12/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine use of a novel telephone and Internet service-the National Pandemic Flu Service (NPFS)-by the population of England during the 2009-2010 influenza pandemic. SETTING National telephone and Internet-based service. PARTICIPANTS Service available to population of England (n=51.8 million). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary: service use rate, by week. Numbers and age-specific and sex-specific rates of population who: accessed service; were authorised to collect antiviral medication; collected antiviral medication; were advised to seek further face-to-face assessment. Secondary: daily mean contacts by hour; proportion using service by telephone/Internet. RESULTS The NPFS was activated on 23 July 2009, operated for 204 days and assessed 2.7 million patients (5200 consultations/100 000 population). This was six times the number of people who consulted their general practitioner with influenza-like illness during the same period (823 consultations/100 000 population, rate ratio (RR)=6.30, 95% CI 6.28 to 6.32). Women used the service more than men (52.6 vs 43.4 assessments/1000 population, RR1 21, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.22). Among adults, use of the service declined with age (16-29 years: 74.4 vs 65 years+: 9.9 assessments/1000 population (RR 7.46 95% CI 7.41 to 7.52). Almost three-quarters of those assessed met the criteria to receive antiviral medication (1 807 866/2 488 510; 72.6%). Most of the people subsequently collected this medication, although more than one-third did not (n=646 709; 35.8%). Just over one-third of those assessed were advised to seek further face-to-face assessment with a practitioner (951 332/2 488 504; 38.2%). CONCLUSIONS This innovative healthcare service operated at large scale and achieved its aim of relieving considerable pressure from mainstream health services, while providing appropriate initial assessment and management for patients. This offers proof-of-concept for such a service that, with further refinement, England can use in future pandemics. Other countries may wish to adopt a similar system as part of their pandemic emergency planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oliver Mytton
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin Ellis
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|