Usefulness of an HIV DNA resistance genotypic test in patients who are candidates for a switch to the rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate combination

Consistency of drug-resistant mutations in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced HIV-1 infection

Introduction

Genotypic drug resistance testing is cursrently recommended by the World Health Organization for all patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) undergoing care or switching regimes due to failure with previous antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) who meet the criteria for free testing for genotypic drug resistance due to poor adherence in Henan Province may resume their previous regimens before resampling. Therefore, resistance testing based on plasma RNA can fail in a proportion of patients. Resistance testing based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is an alternative option. In this study, we investigated the differences in drug-resistant mutations (DRMs) between plasma HIV RNA and proviral DNA in treatment-experienced and treatment-naïve patients.

Methods

Matched plasma RNA and proviral DNA samples of 66 HIV-1 infected treatment-naïve and 78 treatment-experienced patients were selected for DRM analysis and comparison.

Results

DRMs were detected in 27.3% (18/66) of treatment-naïve and 80.8% (63/78) of treatment-experienced samples. Resistance to at least one drug was detected based on analysis of plasma RNA and proviral DNA in 7.6% (5/66) and 9.1% (6/66) of treatment-naïve patients and in 79.5% (62/78) and 78.2% (61/78) of treatment-experienced patients, respectively. Furthermore, 61/66 (92.4%) of treatment-naïve patients showed concordant RNA and DNA drug resistance. When drug resistance was defined as intermediate and high, the concordance of drug resistance profiles of paired RNA and proviral DNA samples derived from treatment-naïve patients were up to 97.0% compared with only 80.8% (63/78) in treatment-experienced patients.

Discussion

Our data indicate that drug resistance testing based on plasma RNA or proviral DNA might be interchangeable in treatment-naïve patients, whereas plasma RNA-based testing remains the best choice for drug resistance analysis in patients with ART failure in clinical practice.

Role of Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotyping for People Living with HIV (PLWH) Who Had Low-Level Viremia While Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy

Objective

To analyze the antiretroviral resistance in people living with HIV (PLWH) who developed low-level viremia (LLV) during antiretroviral therapy (ART) via sequencing of their HIV-1 proviral DNA and RNA and comparisons of their proviral DNA genotyping data with their past and synchronous RNA genotyping data.

Patients and Methods

PLWH with LLV while receiving ART for 6 months or longer from January 2020 to September 2021 were included. HIV-1 proviral DNA and RNA were extracted from white-blood cells and concentrated plasma by ultracentrifugation, respectively, and HIV-1 pol gene fragments were amplified and sequenced. The concordance in the detection of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were examined between proviral DNA vs past RNA genotyping and proviral DNA vs synchronous RNA genotyping.

Results

Of the 150 PLWH with LLV, 117 proviral DNA pol sequences detected in 105 PLWH were successfully amplified and RAMs were present in 27.6% and the rate of RAMs conferring low-level or greater resistance to antiretrovirals examined was 17.1%. Fifty-six and 57 PLWH had results of past and synchronous RNA genotyping, respectively, for comparisons with those of proviral DNA genotyping; and the concordance rates were 76.8% and 75.4%, respectively. However, proviral DNA genotyping lost than gained partial information on antiretroviral resistance compared with past or synchronous RNA genotyping.

Conclusion

We found that the concordance between proviral DNA and past and synchronous RNA genotyping was moderate. Proviral DNA genotyping lost than gained more information on antiretroviral resistance compared with past or synchronous RNA genotyping. To optimize ART in PLWH with LLV, antiretroviral resistance profile should be interpreted in combination with proviral DNA and RNA genotyping and a comprehensive review of previous treatment history.

Assessing the Virologic Impact of Archived Resistance in the Dolutegravir/Lamivudine 2-Drug Regimen HIV-1 Switch Study TANGO through Week 144

The TANGO study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03446573) demonstrated that switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was non-inferior to continuing tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens (TBR) through week 144. Retrospective baseline proviral DNA genotypes were performed for 734 participants (post-hoc analysis) to assess the impact of archived, pre-existing drug resistance on 144-week virologic outcomes by last on-treatment viral load (VL) and Snapshot. A total of 320 (86%) participants on DTG/3TC and 318 (85%) on TBR had both proviral genotype data and ≥1 on-treatment post-baseline VL results and were defined as the proviral DNA resistance analysis population. Archived International AIDS Society-USA major nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor, and integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed in 42 (7%), 90 (14%), 42 (7%), and 11 (2%) participants, respectively, across both groups; 469 (74%) had no major RAMs at baseline. M184V/I (1%), K65N/R (<1%), and thymidine analogue mutations (2%) were infrequent. Through week 144, >99% of participants on DTG/3TC and 99% on TBR were virologically suppressed (last on-treatment VL <50 copies/mL) regardless of the presence of major RAMs. Results from the sensitivity analysis by Snapshot were consistent with the last available on-treatment VL. In TANGO, archived, pre-existing major RAMs did not impact virologic outcomes through week 144.

Genotypic Resistance Testing of HIV-1 DNA in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

HIV-1 DNA exists in nonintegrated linear and circular episomal forms and as integrated proviruses. In patients with plasma viremia, most peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) HIV-1 DNA consists of recently produced nonintegrated virus DNA while in patients with prolonged virological suppression (VS) on antiretroviral therapy (ART), most PBMC HIV-1 DNA consists of proviral DNA produced months to years earlier. Drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in PBMCs are more likely to coexist with ancestral wild-type virus populations than they are in plasma, explaining why next-generation sequencing is particularly useful for the detection of PBMC-associated DRMs. In patients with ongoing high levels of active virus replication, the DRMs detected in PBMCs and in plasma are usually highly concordant. However, in patients with lower levels of virus replication, it may take several months for plasma virus DRMs to reach detectable levels in PBMCs. This time lag explains why, in patients with VS, PBMC genotypic resistance testing (GRT) is less sensitive than historical plasma virus GRT, if previous episodes of virological failure and emergent DRMs were either not prolonged or not associated with high levels of plasma viremia. Despite the increasing use of PBMC GRT in patients with VS, few studies have examined the predictive value of DRMs on the response to a simplified ART regimen. In this review, we summarize what is known about PBMC HIV-1 DNA dynamics, particularly in patients with suppressed plasma viremia, the methods used for PBMC HIV-1 GRT, and the scenarios in which PBMC GRT has been used clinically.

HIV DNA Sequencing to Detect Archived Antiretroviral Drug Resistance

INTRODUCTION

Proviral HIV DNA integrated within CD4 T-cells maintains an archive of viral variants that replicate during the course of the infection, including variants with reduced drug susceptibility. We considered studies that investigated archived drug resistance, with a focus on virologically suppressed patients and highlighted interpretative caveats and gaps in knowledge.

RESULTS

Either Sanger or deep sequencing can be used to investigate resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in HIV DNA recovered from peripheral blood. Neither technique is free of limitations. Furthermore, evidence regarding the establishment, maintenance, expression and clinical significance of archived drug-resistant variants is conflicting. This in part reflects the complexity of the HIV proviral landscape and its dynamics during therapy. Clinically, detection of RAMs in cellular HIV DNA has a variable impact on treatment outcomes, modulated by the drugs affected, treatment duration and additional determinants of virological failure, including those leading to suboptimal drug exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequencing cellular HIV DNA can provide helpful complementary information in treatment-experienced patients with suppressed plasma HIV RNA who require a change of regimen. However, care should be taken when interpreting the results. Presence of RAMs is not necessarily a barrier to treatment success. Conversely, even the most sensitive sequencing techniques will fail to provide a comprehensive view of the HIV DNA archive. To inform treatment decisions appropriately, the overall clinical and treatment history of a patient must always be considered alongside the results of resistance testing. Prospective controlled studies are needed to validate the utility of drug resistance testing using cellular HIV DNA.

Assessment of intra-sample variability in HIV-1 DNA drug resistance genotyping

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

HIV-1 drug resistance testing can be performed in proviral DNA. The non-homogenous distribution of viral variants in cells can impact the performance of this method. We assessed the variability of HIV-1 DNA genotyping results in the same blood sample using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) method.

METHODS

For each included patient, a blood sample from a single venipuncture was split into five 1 mL aliquots, which were independently tested in the same run. HIV-1 DNA was quantified in blood samples using real-time PCR, and NGS was performed with the Sentosa platform combined with the Sentosa SQ HIV genotyping Assay.

RESULTS

A total of 60 aliquots from 12 samples (12 patients) were tested. The median age was 45.50 years old, and all patients were treated with antiretrovirals. A significant variability can sometimes be observed in HIV-1 DNA quantification between aliquots from the same sample, with a coefficient of variation ranging from 23% to 89%. The analysis of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) with a 20% cut-off found some discordances in RAMs profile between aliquots from the same sample for 5, 3 and 3 patients in the reverse transcriptase, protease and integrase genes, respectively. The analysis with a lower cut-off (10%) showed additional mutations, but did not improve the intra-sample concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an intra-sample variability in HIV-1 DNA resistance test results, and repetition may sometimes bring additional information, but the extent of its clinical impact still requires further investigation.

Prevalence of M184V and K65R in proviral DNA from PBMCs in HIV-infected youths with lamivudine/emtricitabine exposure

Objectives

We analysed the prevalence of M184V/I and/or K65R/E/N mutations archived in proviral DNA (pDNA) in youths with perinatal HIV, virological control and who previously carried these resistance mutations in historic plasma samples.

Methods

We included vertically HIV-infected youths/young adults aged ≥10 years in the Madrid Cohort of HIV-1 Infected Children and Adolescents, exposed to lamivudine and/or emtricitabine, with M184V/I and/or K65R/E/N in historic plasma samples, on antiretroviral therapy (ART), virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL), and with available PBMCs in the Spanish HIV BioBank. Genomic DNA was extracted from PBMCs and HIV-1 RT gene was amplified and sequenced for resistance testing by Stanford HIV Resistance tool.

Results

Among the 225 patients under follow-up in the study cohort, 13 (5.8%) met selection criteria, and RT sequences were recovered in 12 (92.3%) of them. All but one were Spaniards, carrying subtype B, with a median age at PBMCs sampling of 21.3 years (IQR: 15.6–23.1) with 4 years (IQR 2.1–6.5) of suppressed viral load (VL). Nine (75%) youths did not present M184V/I in pDNA after at least 1 year of viral suppression. In December 2019, the remaining three subjects carrying M184V/I in pDNA maintained suppressed viraemia, and two still used emtricitabine in ART.

Conclusions

The prevalence of resistance mutations to lamivudine and emtricitabine in pDNA in a cohort of youths perinatally infected with HIV who remain with undetectable VL, previously lamivudine and/or emtricitabine experienced, was infrequent. Our results indicate that ART including lamivudine or emtricitabine may also be safe and successful in youths with perinatal HIV with previous experience of and resistances to these drugs detected in plasma.

Virological Outcome After Choice of Antiretroviral Regimen Guided by Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotyping in a Real-Life Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients

Issues have been raised concerning clinical relevance of HIV-1 proviral DNA genotypic resistance test (DNA GRT). To assess impact of DNA GRT on choice of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and subsequent virological outcome, we retrospectively reviewed decision-making and viral load (VL) evolution following DNA GRT performed in our center between January 2012 and December 2017, except those prescribed within the framework of a clinical trial. A total of 304 DNA GRTs were included, 185 (62%) performed in a context of virological success. Only 34% of tests were followed by ART change, more frequently in situation of virological success (39% vs. 26%, p = 0.02). In this situation, ART change guided by DNA GRT led to VL >20 copies/mL after 6 months in 5% of cases. In multivariate analysis, higher HIV DNA quantification (p = 0.01) was associated with occurrence of viremia. A higher nadir of CD4 count (p = 0.04) and a longer time with VL <20 copies/mL (p = 0.04) were independently associated with a lower risk of viremia. In situation of low-level viremia, ART change guided by DNA GRT led to VL <20 copies/mL after 6 months in 52% of cases, while decision to maintain the same treatment led to VL <20 copies/mL in 74% of cases. In multivariate analysis, longer time with VL >20 copies/mL (p = 0.02) was associated with persistence of virological replication. In conclusion, in situation of virological success, use of DNA GRT in addition to analysis of historical RNA GRT to guide ART optimization appears safe. Its prescription framework in situation of low-level viremia deserves to be better defined.

Routine drug resistance testing in HIV-1 proviral DNA, using an automated next- generation sequencing assay

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 DNA genotypic drug resistance testing is increasingly performed to guide treatment switching or simplification in controlled patients. The Sentosa NGS platform is a fully automated system marketed for drug resistance testing on HIV-1 RNA samples.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate this automated NGS solution for routine resistance genotypic resistance testing in proviral HIV-1 DNA.

STUDY DESIGN

Sanger sequencing (SS) of the reverse transcriptase (RT), protease (PR) and integrase (IN) genes was performed using the French ANRS protocol. NGS was performed retrospectively on frozen samples, using the Sentosa platform combined with the Sentosa SQ HIV genotyping Assay.

RESULTS

A total of 77 samples were run once using NGS. A successful sequencing of the three HIV-1 genes (RT, PR, IN) was obtained for 45 samples. The number of cumulated RAMs was 179, 185 and 219 with SS, NGS 20% and NGS 10% respectively; however most of them were minor mutations in the PR region. The mutation detection rate was similar between SS and NGS 20%. Several discordances were observed between both methods in the RT and PR regions, mainly due to the use of different DNA extracts, and hypermutation.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-1 DNA genotypic resistance testing can be performed with the Sentosa platform. Few technical optimizations are still needed to include the extraction step and to improve the sequencing efficiency.

Utility of HIV-1 DNA genotype in determining antiretroviral resistance in patients with low or undetectable HIV RNA viral loads

Objectives

To investigate the extent to which drug resistance can be evaluated from proviral HIV-1 DNA genotype compared with RNA genotype at different timepoints.

Patients and methods

In HIV-1-infected patients routinely seen at a university hospital, who needed to change their current ART, antiretroviral drug resistance was determined from DNA genotype and was compared with past RNA genotype (group 1) or same-day RNA genotype (group 2). A 'resistance sum' was defined as the sum of agents to which resistance was present and was calculated across NRTI, NNRTI and PI. We defined 'loss of information' as when a lower resistance sum was observed in DNA than in RNA samples.

Results

Of the 74 and 26 patients included in groups 1 and 2, respectively, most had a long median duration of known HIV-1 infection (17.4 and 14.2 years) and ART (15.3 years and 13.5 years). For group 1, the median (range) resistance sums between DNA/RNA were 0 (0-6)/1 (0-6) for NRTIs, 0 (0-4)/0 (0-4) for NNRTIs and 0 (0-7)/0 (0-8) for PIs, which were comparable with group 2. Loss of information in DNA was substantial for group 1 (37.8%) and less so for group 2 (11.1%). In multivariable analysis, only longer ART duration was significantly associated with loss of information. Results were similar in patients harbouring resistance to one or more agents.

Conclusions

In a real-life setting, genotyping DNA from PBMC has some degree of concordance compared with RNA. Loss of information in DNA would appear to coincide with longer periods of ART.

Ultra-deep sequencing improves the detection of drug resistance in cellular DNA from HIV-infected patients on ART with suppressed viraemia

Background

Standard genotypic tests performed on HIV DNA from patients on suppressive ART, with previous resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) detected in their plasma, underestimate resistance. We thus compared ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) with bulk sequencing of DNA to detect RAMs previously identified in plasma.

Methods

We sequenced the DNA of 169 highly treatment experienced patients with suppressed viraemia (ANRS 138-EASIER trial). Protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes from HIV DNA were sequenced by bulk sequencing and UDS, comparing 1% and 20% as thresholds of detection for UDS.

Results

Patients were highly treatment experienced (13.6 years). UDS of DNA was successful for the RT and PR genes in 133 (79%) and 137 (81%) patients, respectively. The detection of RAMs was similar by bulk sequencing and UDS with a 20% cut-off. However, the detection of RAMs by UDS with a 1% cut-off was significantly higher than that of bulk sequencing for RT codons D67N (65.4% versus 52.3%), M184V (66.2% versus 52.3%), L210W (48.9% versus 36.4%) and T215Y (57.9% versus 42.1%) and PR codons M46I (46% versus 26%), I54L (12.4% versus 3.9%), V82A (44.5% versus 29.9%) and L90M (57.7% versus 42.5%).

Conclusions

Genotypic resistance testing of cellular HIV DNA of well-controlled patients should use UDS technology with a sensitivity threshold of 1% to improve the detection of the resistant reservoir.

Routine drug resistance testing in proviral HIV-1 DNA: Prevalence of stop codons and hypermutation, and associated factors

We investigated the presence of stop codons (SC) and/or hypermutation (HM) in HIV-1 DNA sequences generated for routine drug resistance testing in proviral HIV-1 DNA, and sought for associated factors. At least one SC was identified in 6.2% of HIV-1 DNA sequences, among which 54.8% were hypermutated. The defective virus group (SC w/o HM) was similar to the non-SC group regarding the characteristics of HIV-1 infection, and before drug exposure. In addition, the HIV-1 DNA levels were not different between both groups. Sequences with SC/HM displayed a higher proportion of RAMs. The impact of the SC/HM associated RAMs on clinical responses requires further investigation.

RNA and DNA Sanger sequencing versus next-generation sequencing for HIV-1 drug resistance testing in treatment-naive patients

Background

Sanger sequencing of plasma RNA is the standard method for HIV-1 drug resistance testing in treatment-naive patients, but is limited by the non-detection of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) with prevalence below approximately 20%.

Objectives

We compared RNA and DNA Sanger sequencing (RSS and DSS) with RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) for RAM detection in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), protease (PR) and integrase (IN) genes.

Methods

Sanger sequencing was performed on RNA and DNA, following the recommendations of the French Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS). NGS was performed on RNA using the HIV-1 Drug Resistance Assay, v. 3.0 (Roche) on the 454 GS Junior sequencer. The IAS-USA list was used to identify RAMs. ANRS, Rega and Stanford algorithms were used for drug resistance interpretation.

Results

The study included 48 ART-naive patients. The number of patients with at least one major RAM was 3, 3, 4 and 8 when using RSS, DSS, NGS 20% and NGS 5%, respectively. Numerous minor mutations were detected in patients, especially in the protease gene. None of the methods detected any major mutation in the integrase gene. Overall, the mutation detection rate was similar between RSS and DSS, and higher with NGS 20%. Differences in drug resistance interpretation were found between algorithms. No impact of the minority RAMs detected by NGS was found on the short-term treatment outcome.

Conclusions

DSS does not clearly improve the detection of RAMs in ART-naive patients, as compared with RSS. NGS allows detection of additional minority RAMs; however, their clinical relevance requires further investigation.

Interest of proviral HIV-1 DNA genotypic resistance testing in virologically suppressed patients candidate for maintenance therapy

Switch of antiretroviral therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients is frequent, to prevent toxicities, for simplification or convenience reasons. Pretherapeutic genotypic resistance testing on RNA can be lacking in some patients, which could enhance the risk of virologic failure, if resistance-associated mutations of the new regimen are not taken into account. Proviral DNA resistance testing in 69 virologically suppressed patients on antiretroviral treatment with no history of virological failure were pair-wised compared with pre-ART plasma RNA resistance testing. The median time between plasma (RNA testing) and whole blood (proviral DNA testing) was 47 months (IQR 29-63). A stop codon was evidenced in 23% (16/69) of proviral DNA sequences; these strains were considered as defective, non-replicative, and not taken into consideration. Within the non defective strains, concordance rate between plasma RNA and non-defective proviral DNA was high both on protease (194/220 concordant resistance-associated mutations=88%) and reverse transcriptase (28/37 concordant resistance-associated mutations=76%) genes. This study supports that proviral DNA testing might be an informative tool before switching antiretrovirals in virologically suppressed patients with no history of virological failure, but the interpretation should be restricted to non-defective viruses.

Switching regimens in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients: evidence base and rationale for integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens

In an era when most individuals with treated HIV infection can expect to live into old age, clinicians should proactively review their patients' current and future treatment needs and challenges. Clinical guidelines acknowledge that, in the setting of virological suppression, treatment switch may yield benefits in terms of tolerability, regimen simplification, adherence, convenience and long-term health considerations, particularly in the context of ageing. In this paper, we review evidence from six key clinical studies on switching virologically suppressed patients to regimens based on integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), the antiretroviral class increasingly preferred as initial therapy in clinical guidelines. We review these studies and focus on the virological efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to INSTI-based regimens in suppressed HIV-positive individuals. We review the early switch studies SWITCHMRK and SPIRAL [assessing a switch from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) to raltegravir (RAL)-containing regimens], together with data from STRATEGY-PI [assessing a switch to elvitegravir (EVG)-containing regimens; EVG/cobicistat (COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. remaining on a PI/r-containing regimen], STRATEGY-NNRTI [assessing a switch to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF vs. continuation of a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)], STRIIVING [assessing a switch to a dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimen (abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC)/DTG) vs. staying on the background regimen], and GS study 109 [assessing a switch to EVG/COBI/FTC/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) vs. continuation of FTC/TDF-based regimens]. Switching to INSTI-containing regimens has been shown to support good virological efficacy, with evidence from two studies demonstrating superior virological efficacy for a switch to EVG-containing regimens. In addition, switching to INSTI regimens was associated with improved tolerability and greater reported patient satisfaction and outcomes in some studies. INSTI-based regimens offer an important contemporary switch option that may be tailored to meet and optimize the needs of many patients.