Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate antimicrobial prophylaxis in abdominal surgery

Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing intermittent cefoxitin administration versus loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: the PROPHYLOXITIN study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in Europe with the highest rates being reported in colorectal surgery (ranging from 9% to 30%). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the most efficient measures for SSI prevention and should be started before surgical incision. Cefoxitin is an antibiotic widely used as SAP for colorectal surgery, but its continuous administration is currently the subject of debate due to its potential pharmacokinetic advantages. Therefore, the aim of the PROPHYLOXITIN study is to demonstrate that a loading dose followed by continuous infusion of cefoxitin during colorectal surgery (intervention group) decreases the rate of SSI compared to an intermittent bolus administration (control group).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The PROPHYLOXITIN study is a superiority, prospective, double-blind, randomised and multicentre study of 2000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of a loading dose of cefoxitin followed by continuous infusion over intermittent bolus administration in reducing the proportion of SSIs within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Subjects will be randomised 1:1 using a secure web-based random-number generator to one of two study groups. Randomised allocation of treatment will be done by minimisation and stratified according to the centre, the localisation of surgery (colon or rectum) and the type of surgical procedure (laparoscopy or laparotomy).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research has been approved by an independent ethics committee and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT 2022-003262-20 and Clinical trial NCT05755789.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentration in patients with prostatectomy or nephrectomy

The aim of this study was to analyze the population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin (CFZ) in patients with prostatectomy or nephrectomy. We also aimed to calculate a pharmacodynamics target unbound concentration that exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), to design an effective dosing regimen. Briefly, 614 total concentration and 610 unbound concentration samples from 152 individuals were evaluated, using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. The obtained pharmacodynamics index target value reflected the probability of maintaining CFZ unbound trough concentrations exceeding MIC90, 0.5 mg/L, and MIC50, and 1.0 mg/L, to account for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or Escherichia coli. Population pharmacokinetics were estimated using a two-compartment model with nonlinear protein binding. Unbound systemic clearance (CL) was significantly associated with creatinine clearance, while the maximum protein-binding constant was significantly associated with albumin levels. The probability of achieving an unbound concentration exceeding the MIC50 for E. coli or MIC90 for MSSA in a patient with normal renal function following a 1 g CFZ infusion over 15 min was above 90% at 3 h after the initial dose. Our findings indicated that population pharmacokinetic parameters are useful for determining unbound CFZ pharmacokinetics and evaluating intraoperative CFZ redosing intervals.

Dosing Cefazolin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Infusion?-A Pilot Study

Background: Cefazolin may minimize the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Cefazolin dosing recommendations vary and there is limited evidence for achieved tissue concentrations. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled, prospective pharmacokinetic pilot study of 12 patients given cefazolin by either intermittent bolus (30 mg/kg every 3 h) or continuous infusion (30 mg/kg bolus followed by 10/mg/kg per hour) during PSF for AIS. Results: Patients were well matched for demographic and perioperative variables. While total drug exposure, measured as area-under-the-curve (AUC), was similar in plasma for bolus and infusion dosing, infusion dosing achieved greater cefazolin exposure in subcutaneous and muscle tissue. Using the pharmacodynamic metric of time spent above minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), both bolus and infusion dosing performed well. However, when targeting a bactericidal concentration of 32 µg/mL, patients in the bolus group spent a median of 1/5 and 1/3 of the typical 6 h operative time below target in subcutaneous and muscle tissue, respectively. Conclusions: We conclude that intraoperative determination of cefazolin tissue concentrations is feasible and both bolus and infusion dosing of cefazolin achieve concentrations in excess of typical MICs. Infusion dosing appears to more consistently achieve bactericidal concentrations in subcutaneous and muscle tissues.

Potent antibacterial activity in surgical wounds with local administration of D-PLEX100

Despite significant advances in infection control guidelines and practices, surgical site infections remain a substantial cause of morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. The most effective component of SSI reduction strategies is the preoperative administration of intravenous antibiotics; however, systemic antibiotics drug exposure diminishes rapidly and may result in insufficient prophylactic activity against susceptible and resistant SSI pathogens at the wound. D-PLEX100 (D-PLEX) is an antibiotic-releasing drug (doxycycline) that is supplied as a sterile powder for paste reconstitution with sterile saline. D-PLEX paste is administered locally into the incision site along the entire length of soft tissue and sternal bone wound surfaces prior to skin closure. A single D-PLEX administration is intended for 30 days of constant antimicrobial prophylaxis in the prevention of incisional SSIs. We evaluated D-PLEX minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) against a panel of bacteria that is prevalent in the abdominal wall and sternal surgical procedures including doxycycline susceptible and resistant strains. D-PLEX in vivo efficacy was assessed in incisional infection rabbit models (abdominal wall and sternal) challenged with a similar bacterial panel. The D-PLEX drug exposure profile was determined by in vitro release assay, and in vivo by quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters of local and systemic doxycycline concentrations released from D-PLEX after local administration in incisional rabbit models. Analyses of pathogens and variations in antibiotic resistance from wound isolates were determined from patients who participated in a previously reported prospective randomized trial that assessed the SSI rate in D-PLEX plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in colorectal resection surgery. The D-PLEX MBC values demonstrated >3- Log10 reduction in all the organisms tested relative to untreated controls, including doxycycline-resistant bacteria (i.e., Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa). In vivo, D-PLEX significantly reduced the bacterial loads in all the bacteria tested in both animal models (p=0.0001) with a marked impact observed in E. Coli (>6.5 Log10 reduction). D-PLEX exhibited a zero-order release kinetics profile in vitro for 30 days (R2 = 0.971) and the matched in vivo release profile indicated a constant local release of protein-unbound doxycycline for 30 days at 3-5 mcg/mL with significantly lower (>3 orders of magnitudes) systemic levels. In colorectal surgery patients, where significant SSI reduction was observed, analysis of the positive cultures in the overall population indicated similar pathogen diversity and antibiotic resistance rates in both treatment arms. However, almost all the patients with positive culture in the SOC arm were adjudicated as SSI (94%) compared to only 28% in the D-PLEX arm. The SSI-adjudicated D-PLEX patients also exhibited lower resistance rates to the SOC antibiotics and to MDRs compared to patients in the SOC arm. Thus, D-PLEX provides safe and effective prophylaxis activity against the most prevalent SSI pathogens including doxycycline-susceptible and resistant bacteria. Our findings suggest that D-PLEX is a promising addition to SSI prophylactic bundles and may address the gaps in current SSI prophylaxis. D-PLEX is now evaluated in Phase 3 clinical trial.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Megaprosthetic Reconstructions: Drug and Dosing May Matter More than Duration

In orthopedic oncology, the implant of a megaprosthetic device is standard of care after large-scale tumor resection involving segmental removal of bone. Infection remains the leading cause of implant failure, often resulting in major morbidity. Perioperative antibiotic practices for megaprosthetic reconstructions are not standardized and are based on guidelines for conventional joint arthroplasties. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of current prophylactic strategies for megaprosthetic reconstructions. We conducted a retrospective review of megaprosthetic reconstructions performed at Duke University from 2001 to 2021. Logistic regression with GEE was used to assess whether a prolonged course of postoperative antibiotics is associated with infection risk. We assessed the microbial profile and corresponding susceptibilities of megaprosthetic infections through record review. Additionally, we designed a pharmacokinetic subgroup analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to quantify antibiotic concentrations in surgical tissue. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to correlate tissue concentrations with infection risk. Out of 184 cases, 23 (12.5%) developed infection within 1 year. Extended postoperative antibiotics were not significantly associated with infection risk (P = 0.23). Among 18 culture-positive cases, 4 (22.2%) were caused by cefazolin-susceptible organisms. Median bone and muscle concentrations of cefazolin among cases that developed postoperative infection (0.065 ng/mL and 0.2 ng/mL, respectively) were significantly lower than those of cases that did not (0.42 ng/mL and 1.95 ng/mL, P < 0.01 and P = 0.03). This study is the first to comprehensively assess aspects of perioperative prophylaxis for megaprosthetic reconstructions. Extending postoperative antibiotics did not reduce infection risk. We detected a high frequency of cefazolin nonsusceptible organisms among postoperative infections. Additionally, intraoperative antibiotic tissue concentrations may be predictive of later infection. Future studies ought to examine optimal drug choices and dosing strategies.

Evaluation of amoxicillin, metronidazole and gentamicin dosage regimens for use in antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate amoxicillin, metronidazole and gentamicin dosage regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 20 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Patients received one or two doses of amoxicillin 1000 mg, metronidazole 500 mg and gentamicin 3 mg/kg ideal body weight, banded by height. Antibiotic concentrations were measured up to 7 h post dose. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis with NONMEM followed by Monte Carlo simulation of different dosage regimens was used to estimate the PTA for potential organisms associated with surgical site infections (SSIs).

RESULTS

A median of 5 (range 3-6) concentrations were available per patient. CL and V of all antibiotics were related to weight; gentamicin CL was also related to CLCR. The administered doses maintained the desired PTA up to 8 h for the Streptococcus anginosus group but not for enterococci, Bacteroides fragilis group, MSSA, and Escherichia coli. An additional 500 mg amoxicillin every 4 h was sufficient to achieve the PTA for most relevant organisms but 2 hourly dosing was required for patients at risk of infective endocarditis. A metronidazole dose of 1000 mg was required for patients >85 kg. In patients with CLCR >50 mL/min, 5 mg/kg gentamicin (with an additional 2.5 mg/kg in prolonged surgery at 6 h) maintained PTA targets for >10 h.

CONCLUSIONS

PopPK analysis with Monte Carlo simulation identified prophylactic antibiotic regimens that would maintain the PTA for organisms associated with SSIs during short- and long-duration colorectal surgery.

Perioperative administration of cefazolin and metronidazole in obese and non-obese patients: a pharmacokinetic study in plasma and interstitial fluid

OBJECTIVES

To assess plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefazolin and metronidazole in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and non-obese patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen obese and 15 non-obese patients received an IV short infusion of 2 g cefazolin and 0.5 g metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis. Plasma and microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue were sampled until 8 h after dosing. Drug concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated non-compartmentally.

RESULTS

In obese patients (BMI 39.5-69.3 kg/m2) compared with non-obese patients (BMI 18.7-29.8 kg/m2), mean Cmax of total cefazolin in plasma was lower (115 versus 174 mg/L) and Vss was higher (19.4 versus 14.2 L). The mean differences in t½ (2.7 versus 2.4 h), CL (5.14 versus 4.63 L/h) and AUC∞ (402 versus 450 mg·h/L) were not significant. The influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole was similar (Cmax 8.99 versus 14.7 mg/L, Vss 73.9 versus 51.8 L, t½ 11.9 versus 9.1 h, CL 4.62 versus 4.13 L/h, AUC∞ 116 versus 127 mg·h/L). Regarding interstitial fluid (ISF), mean concentrations of cefazolin remained >4 mg/L until 6 h in both groups, and those of metronidazole up to 8 h in the non-obese group. In obese patients, the mean ISF concentrations of metronidazole were between 3 and 3.5 mg/L throughout the measuring interval.

CONCLUSIONS

During the time of surgery, cefazolin concentrations in plasma and ISF of subcutaneous tissue were lower in obese patients, but not clinically relevant. Regarding metronidazole, the respective differences were higher, and may influence dosing of metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis in obese patients.

Development of a new pharmacokinetic model for target-concentration controlled infusion of cefoxitin as a prophylactic antibiotic in colorectal surgical patients

AIMS

There are several limitations to the existing method of administering cefoxitin as a prophylactic antibiotic, and the limitations may be overcome by applying the target-concentration controlled infusion (TCI) method. Population pharmacokinetic parameters are required to administer cefoxitin by the TCI method. The aim of this study was to construct a new pharmacokinetic model of cefoxitin for the TCI method in colorectal surgical patients.

METHODS

In patients undergoing colorectal surgery, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 50 mL of saline and administered for 10 minutes prior to skin incision. Arterial blood samples were obtained at preset intervals to measure the total and free plasma concentrations of cefoxitin. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software (ICON Development Solutions, Dublin, Ireland). Additionally, stochastic simulation was used to indirectly evaluate the effectiveness of the two administration methods (standard method vs TCI).

RESULTS

In total, 297 plasma concentration measurements from 31 patients were used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin. A three-compartment mammillary model described the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin. Body weight and creatinine clearance were significant covariates for clearance. The stochastic simulation showed that when compared with the standard method, the TCI method has a significantly higher fraction of time that the free concentration of cefoxitin is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

TCI has the potential to become a new infusion method for patient-tailored dosing in surgical patients. To administer cefoxitin via TCI in clinical practice, the newly constructed pharmacokinetic model should undergo proper external validation.

Reassessing the dosing of cefoxitin prophylaxis during major abdominal surgery: insights from microdialysis and population pharmacokinetic modelling

Objectives

Cefoxitin is frequently used for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). Using microdialysis, we evaluated whether the currently recommended dosing regimen is appropriate to maintain cefoxitin subcutaneous tissue concentrations above the MIC for pathogens involved in abdominal surgical site infection.

Methods

Data from eight patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were analysed using population pharmacokinetic modelling, and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to determine the PTA for aerobic and anaerobic pathogens. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02703857.

Results

Only 2.3% and 47.4% of the simulated patients maintained cefoxitin subcutaneous concentrations above the MIC breakpoint for anaerobic (MIC = 16 mg/L) and aerobic (MIC = 8 mg/L) pathogens, respectively. New simulations with administration of a loading dose followed by a constant infusion of cefoxitin were conducted and demonstrate that, notwithstanding using the same total dose per unit of time, continuous infusion of cefoxitin can cover aerobes in 96.6% of the simulated patients, but remains insufficient for anaerobic bacteria.

Conclusions

The recommended dosing regimen of cefoxitin is insufficient for covering the usual bacteria during abdominal surgery. Administration of a loading dose followed by a constant infusion should be considered for aerobic bacteria and cefoxitin should be avoided as SAP for anaerobic bacteria.

Comparative total and unbound pharmacokinetics of cefazolin administered by bolus versus continuous infusion in patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background.

Perioperative administration of cefazolin reduces the incidence of perioperative infections. Intraoperative re-dosing of cefazolin is commonly given between 2 and 5 h after the initial dose. This study was undertaken to determine whether intraoperative continuous infusions of cefazolin achieve better probability of target attainment (PTA) and fractional target attainment (FTA) than intermittent dosing.

Methods.

Patients undergoing major surgery received cefazolin 2 g before surgical incision. They were subsequently randomized to receive either an intermittent bolus (2 g every 4 h) or continuous infusion (500 mg h -1 ) of cefazolin until skin closure. Blood samples were analysed for total and unbound cefazolin concentrations using a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using Pmetrics ® software. Calculations of PTA and FTA were performed for common pathogens.

Results.

Ten patients were enrolled in each arm. A two-compartment linear model best described the time course of the total plasma cefazolin concentrations. The covariates that improved the model were body weight and creatinine clearance. Protein binding varied with time [mean (range) 69 (44-80)%] with a fixed 21% unbound value of cefazolin used for the simulations (120 min post-initial dosing). Mean ( sd ) central volume of distribution was 5.73 (2.42) litres, and total cefazolin clearance was 4.72 (1.1) litres h -1 . Continuous infusions of cefazolin consistently achieved better drug exposures and FTA for different weight and creatinine clearances, particularly for less susceptible pathogens.

Conclusions.

Our study demonstrates that intraoperative continuous infusions of cefazolin increase the achievement of target plasma concentrations, even with lower infusion doses. Renal function and body weight are important when considering the need for alternative dosing regimens.

Clinical trial registration.

NCT02058979.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Intraoperative Cefazolin Concentrations and Sternal Wound Infections

This study characterizes the pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial prophylaxis and sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery. Duration of surgery and cefazolin plasma concentration during wound closure were independently associated with surgical site infection at 30 days. Furthermore, a duration of surgery of >346 min and a total cefazolin closure concentration of <104 mg/liter were significant thresholds for an increased risk of infection. This study provides new data that informs dosing strategies for effective antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.