Effect of renal clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy on appropriateness of recommended meropenem dosing regimens in critically ill patients with susceptible life-threatening infections

Optimizing meropenem therapy in critical infections: a review of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics research and clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Meropenem is a first-line antibiotic used in the treatment of severe infections. However, patients with critical infections often exhibit a notably low pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) compliance rate, especially in cases involving multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria and in specific patient populations.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the relevant literature on the use of meropenem in treating severe infections, with data primarily sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases before July 2024. The primary analysis focuses on determining the optimal clinical efficacy target value for meropenem in treating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infection, exploring PK/PD research, individualizing drug regiments for special populations, and evaluating safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the PK/PD properties of meropenem across different special populations such as children and elderly patients, as well as its efficacy against severe infections and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, prolonged and continuous infusion regimens of meropenem have already shown some clinical benefit. Personalized dosing of meropenem for critical infections should be guided by real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). However, there is a notable lack of sufficient data, highlighting the necessity for large-scale, multi-center clinical trials to validate the safety and effectiveness of meropenem in treating severe infections.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Prolonged Infusion for Meropenem: Tailoring Dosing Recommendations for Chinese Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with Consideration for Renal Function

Objective

Extended meropenem infusion is increasingly employed to enhance clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Nonetheless, investigations into such dosing regimens in renal-impaired patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are scarce. This study aims to perform a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of prolonged meropenem infusion in critically ill CRRT patients to inform optimal dosing regimens.

Methods

Ninety-four concentrations from 21 Chinese critically ill CRRT patients receiving 1 g meropenem every 8-12 hours infused over 2-3 hours were utilized to construct the population PK model. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to assess the efficacy based on PK/PD targets (100% fT>MIC or 100% fT>4×MIC) and the risk of nephrotoxicity (trough concentration ≥45 mg/L) for extended meropenem dosing regimens (0.5-2 g with a 3-hour infusion administered every 6-12 hours).

Results

Meropenem concentration data was adequately described by a one-compartment model with linear elimination, and creatinine clearance (CLCR) significantly influenced meropenem's endogenous clearance. 0.5 g q6h and 1 g q8h could achieve desirable attainment of 100% fT>MIC target against an MIC≤4 mg/L, with negligible risk of toxicity for CRRT patients across a CLCR range of 10-50 mL/min. 2 g q6h and 2 g q8h is required for targeting 100% fT>4×MIC for the patients, but the associated risk of toxicity is very high (>20%).

Conclusion

A population PK model was developed for prolonged meropenem infusion in Chinese CRRT patients, and 0.5 g q6h and 1 g q8h may be the optimal regimen for prolonged infusion.

The effects of single and multiple resistance mechanisms on bacterial response to meropenem

OBJECTIVES

Meropenem is commonly used against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Traditionally, the time unbound antibiotic concentration exceeds the MIC (fT>MIC) is used to select carbapenem regimens. We aimed to characterize the effects of different baseline resistance mechanisms on bacterial killing and resistance emergence; evaluate whether fT>MIC can predict these effects; and, develop a novel Quantitative and Systems Pharmacology (QSP) model to describe the effects of baseline resistance mechanisms on the time-course of bacterial response.

METHODS

Seven isogenic P. aeruginosa strains with a range of resistance mechanisms and MICs were used in 10-day hollow-fiber infection model studies. Meropenem pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated for various regimens (t1/2,meropenem = 1.5 h). All viable counts on drug-free, 3 × MIC, and 5 × MIC meropenem-containing agar across all strains, five regimens, and control (n = 90 profiles) were simultaneously subjected to QSP modeling. Whole genome sequencing was completed for total population samples and emergent resistant colonies at 239 h.

RESULTS

Regimens achieving ≥98%fT>1×MIC suppressed resistance emergence of the mexR knockout strain. Even 100%fT>5 × MIC failed to achieve this against the strain with OprD loss and the ampD and mexR double-knockout strain. Baseline resistance mechanisms affected bacterial outcomes, even for strains with the same MIC. Genomic analysis revealed that pre-existing resistant subpopulations drove resistance emergence. During meropenem exposure, mutations in mexR were selected in strains with baseline oprD mutations, and vice versa, confirming these as major mechanisms of resistance emergence. Secondary mutations occurred in lysS or argS, coding for lysyl and arginyl tRNA synthetases, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The QSP model well-characterized all bacterial outcomes of the seven strains simultaneously, which fT>MIC could not.

Risk Factors Associated with Antibiotic Exposure Variability in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Knowledge about the behavior of antibiotics in critically ill patients has been increasing in recent years. Some studies have concluded that a high percentage may be outside the therapeutic range. The most likely cause of this is the pharmacokinetic variability of critically ill patients, but it is not clear which factors have the greatest impact. The aim of this systematic review is to identify risk factors among critically ill patients that may exhibit significant pharmacokinetic alterations, compromising treatment efficacy and safety. (2) Methods: The search included the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. (3) Results: We identified 246 observational studies and ten clinical trials. The most studied risk factors in the literature were renal function, weight, age, sex, and renal replacement therapy. Risk factors with the greatest impact included renal function, weight, renal replacement therapy, age, protein or albumin levels, and APACHE or SAPS scores. (4) Conclusions: The review allows us to identify which critically ill patients are at a higher risk of not reaching therapeutic targets and helps us to recognize the extensive number of risk factors that have been studied, guiding their inclusion in future studies. It is essential to continue researching, especially in real clinical practice and with clinical outcomes.

Association between Extended Meropenem Regimen and Achievement of Aggressive PK/PD in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Septic AKI

Aggressive pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets have shown better microbiological eradication rates and a lower propensity to develop resistant strains than conservative targets. We investigated whether meropenem blood levels, including aggressive PK/PD, were acceptable in terms of efficacy and safety using a meropenem regimen of 1 g infusion every 8 h over 3 h in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for septic acute kidney injury (AKI). Aggressive PK/PD targets were defined as the percentage of time that the free concentration (%fT) > 4 × minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the toxicity threshold was defined as a trough concentration >45 mg/L, and the percentage of achievement at each MIC was evaluated. The 100% fT > 4 × MIC for a pathogen with an MIC of 0.5 mg/L was 89%, and that for a pathogen with an MIC of 2 mg/L was 56%. The mean steady-state trough concentration of meropenem was 11.9 ± 9.0 mg/L and the maximum steady-state trough concentration was 29.2 mg/L. Simulations using Bayesian estimation showed the probability of achieving 100% fT > 4 × MIC for up to an MIC of 2 mg/L for the administered administration via continuous infusion at 3 g/24 h. We found that an aggressive PK/PD could be achieved up to an MIC of 0.5 mg/L with a meropenem regimen of 1 g infused every 8 h over 3 h for patients receiving CRRT for septic AKI. In addition, the risk of reaching the toxicity range with this regimen is low. In addition, if the MIC was 1-2 mg/L, the simulation results indicated that aggressive PK/PD can be achieved by continuous infusion at 3 g/24 h without increasing the daily dose.

Inhaled antibiotics: A promising drug delivery strategies for efficient treatment of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) associated with antibiotic resistant biofilm-dwelling and intracellular bacterial pathogens

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria associated with LRTIs are frequently associated with inefficient treatment outcomes. Antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus, infections are strongly associated with pulmonary exacerbations and require frequent hospital admissions, usually following failed management in the community. These bacteria are difficult to treat as they demonstrate multiple adaptational mechanisms including biofilm formation to resist antibiotic threats. Currently, many patients with the genetic disease cystic fibrosis (CF), non-CF bronchiectasis (NCFB) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience exacerbations of their lung disease and require high doses of systemically administered antibiotics to achieve meaningful clinical effects, but even with high systemic doses penetration of antibiotic into the site of infection within the lung is suboptimal. Pulmonary drug delivery technology that reliably deliver antibacterials directly into the infected cells of the lungs and penetrate bacterial biofilms to provide therapeutic doses with a greatly reduced risk of systemic adverse effects. Inhaled liposomal-packaged antibiotic with biofilm-dissolving drugs offer the opportunity for targeted, and highly effective antibacterial therapeutics in the lungs. Although the challenges with development of some inhaled antibiotics and their clinicals trials have been studied; however, only few inhaled products are available on market. This review addresses the current treatment challenges of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the lung with some clinical outcomes and provides future directions with innovative ideas on new inhaled formulations and delivery technology that promise enhanced killing of antibiotic-resistant biofilm-dwelling bacteria.

Meropenem pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment and clinical response in ICU patients: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Several studies report lack of meropenem pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (TA) and risk of therapeutic failure with intermittent bolus infusions in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this study was to describe meropenem TA in an ICU population and the clinical response in the first 72 h after therapy initiation.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of ICU patients ≥18 years was conducted from 2014 to 2017. Patients with normal renal clearance (NRC) and augmented renal clearance (ARC) and patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were included. Meropenem was administered as intermittent bolus infusions, mainly at a dose of 1 g q6h. Peak, mid, and trough levels were sampled at 24, 48, and 72 h after therapy initiation. TA was defined as 100% T > 4× MIC or trough concentration above 4× MIC. Meropenem PK was estimated using traditional calculation methods and population pharmacokinetic modeling (P-metrics®). Clinical response was evaluated by change in C-reactive protein (CRP), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, leukocyte count, and defervescence.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included, with a median Simplified Acute Physiology (SAPS) II score 37 and 90 days mortality rate of 32%. Median TA was 100% for all groups except for the ARC group with 45.5%. Median CRP fell from 175 (interquartile range [IQR], 88-257) to 70 (IQR, 30-114) (p < .001) in the total population. A reduction in SOFA score was observed only in the non-CRRT groups (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Intermittent meropenem bolus infusion q6h gives satisfactory TA in an ICU population with variable renal function and CRRT modality, except for ARC patients. No consistent relationship between TA and clinical endpoints were observed.

Systematic Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Models for Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

The altered pharmacokinetics of renally cleared drugs such as meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) might impact target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is applied to individualize meropenem dosing. However, most population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models developed to date have not yet been evaluated for MIPD. Eight PopPK models based on adult CRRT patients were identified in a systematic literature research and encoded in NONMEM 7.4. A data set of 73 CRRT patients from two different study centers was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models using simulation and prediction-based diagnostics for i) a priori dosing based on patient characteristics only and ii) Bayesian dosing by including the first measured trough concentration. Median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy within |20%| (95% confidence intervals including zero) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision ≤ 30% were considered clinically acceptable. For a priori dosing, most models (n = 5) showed accuracy and precision MPE within |20%| and MAPE <35%. The integration of the first measured meropenem concentration improved the predictive performance of all models (median MAPE decreased from 35.4 to 25.0%; median MPE decreased from 21.8 to 4.6%). The best predictive performance for intermittent infusion was observed for the O'Jeanson model, including residual diuresis as covariate (a priori and Bayesian dosing MPE within |2%|, MAPE <30%). Our study revealed the O'Jeanson model as the best-predicting model for intermittent infusion. However, most of the selected PopPK models are suitable for MIPD in CRRT patients when one therapeutic drug monitoring sample is available.

Evaluation of the meropenem dosage and administration schedule in patients with bacteremia initial therapy

BACKGROUND

The standard meropenem (MEPM) regimen allowed by insurance in Japan is 0.5 g two or three times a day. Differences in dosages and administration schedules in Japan were evaluated.

METHODS

Patients with bacteremia for whom MEPM was used as the initial treatment at our institution between 2016 and 2021 were included. We retrospectively investigated patients classified into two groups: those treated according to severe infections (high-dose groupand others (low-dose group). After propensity score matching, we compared the probability of achieving free drug blood levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 24 h (%fT > MIC) and outcomes.

RESULTS

The probability of 100% fT > MIC was significantly higher in the high-dose group (96.4% vs 74.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.2-0.4, P = < 0.001). Regarding outcomes, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the high-dose group (1.4% vs. 11.4%, OR = 8.0, 95% CI = 1.5-43.7, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

To improve outcomes in patients with bacteremia treated with MEPM, support for appropriate antimicrobial use is necessary for compliance with the dosage and administration schedule according to severe infections in initial treatment.

Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Critical Care: Adjusting the Dose in Extracorporeal Circulation and to Prevent the Genesis of Multiresistant Bacteria

Critically ill patients suffering from severe infections are prone to pathophysiological pharmacokinetic changes that are frequently associated with inadequate antibiotic serum concentrations. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the causative pathogens tend to be higher in intensive care units. Both pharmacokinetic changes and high antibiotic resistance likely jeopardize the efficacy of treatment. The use of extracorporeal circulation devices to support hemodynamic, respiratory, or renal failure enables pharmacokinetic changes and makes it even more difficult to achieve an adequate antibiotic dose. Besides a clinical response, antibiotic pharmacokinetic optimization is important to reduce the selection of strains resistant to common antibiotics. In this review, we summarize the present knowledge regarding pharmacokinetic changes in critically ill patients and we discuss the effects of extra-corporeal devices on antibiotic treatment together with potential solutions.

Meropenem Model-Informed Precision Dosing in the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients: Can We Use It?

The number of pharmacokinetic (PK) models of meropenem is increasing. However, the daily role of these PK models in the clinic remains unclear, especially for critically ill patients. Therefore, we evaluated the published meropenem models on real-world ICU data to assess their suitability for use in clinical practice. All models were built in NONMEM and evaluated using prediction and simulation-based diagnostics for the ability to predict the subsequent meropenem concentrations without plasma concentrations (a priori), and with plasma concentrations (a posteriori), for use in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Eighteen PopPK models were included for evaluation. The a priori fit of the models, without the use of plasma concentrations, was poor, with a prediction error (PE)% of the interquartile range (IQR) exceeding the ±30% threshold. The fit improved when one to three concentrations were used to improve model predictions for TDM purposes. Two models were in the acceptable range with an IQR PE% within ±30%, when two or three concentrations were used. The role of PK models to determine the starting dose of meropenem in this population seems limited. However, certain models might be suitable for TDM-based dose adjustment using two to three plasma concentrations.

Evaluation of Empirical Dosing Regimens for Meropenem in Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Target Attainment Analysis

In the present study, population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed based on meropenem data from a prospective study conducted in 114 critically ill patients with a wide range of renal functions and various disease conditions. The final model was a one-compartment model with linear elimination, with creatinine clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy affecting clearance, and total bodyweight impacting the volume of distribution. Our model is a valuable addition to the existing meropenem population PK models, and it could be particularly useful during implementation of a therapeutic drug monitoring program combined with Bayesian forecasting. Based on the final model developed, comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of 16 different dosing regimens. Simulation results showed that 2 g administered every 8 h with 3-h prolonged infusion (PI) and 4 g/day by continuous infusion (CI) appear to be two empirical dosing regimens that are superior to many other regimens when both target attainment and potential toxicity are considered and renal function information is not available. Following a daily CI dose of 6 g or higher, more than 30% of the population with a creatinine clearance of <60 mL/min is predicted to have neurotoxicity. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific meropenem susceptibility patterns, as well as an individual patient's renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Empirical Antibiotic Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacilli Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Observational Study and Pharmacodynamic Assessment

Background: Strong evidence suggests a correlation between pharmacodynamics (PD) index and antibiotic efficacy while dose adjustment should be considered in critically ill patients due to modified pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and/or higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). This study aimed to assess pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment considering both antibiotics serum concentrations and measured MICs in these patients. Method: A multicentric prospective open-label trial conducted in 11 French ICUs involved patients with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) confirmed by quantitative cultures. Results: We included 117 patients. Causative GNBs were P. aeruginosa (40%), Enterobacter spp. (23%), E. coli (20%), and Klebsiella spp. (16%). Hence, 117 (100%) patients received β-lactams, 65 (58%) aminoglycosides, and two (1.5%) fluoroquinolones. For β-lactams, 83% of the patients achieved a Cmin/MIC > 1 and 70% had a Cmin/MIC > 4. In the case of high creatinine clearance (CrCL > 100 mL/min/1.73 m2), 70.4% of the patients achieved a Cmin/MIC ratio > 1 versus 91% otherwise (p = 0.041), and 52% achieved a Cmin/MIC ratio > 4 versus 81% (p = 0.018). For aminoglycosides, 94% of the patients had a Cmax/MIC ratio > 8. Neither β-lactams nor aminoglycosides PK/PD parameters were associated clinical outcomes, but our data suggest a correlation between β-lactams Cmin/MIC and microbiological success. Conclusion: In our ICU patients treated for GNB VAP, using recommended antibiotic dosage led in most cases to PK/PD targets attainment for aminoglycosides and β-lactams. High creatinine clearance should encourage clinicians to focus on PK/PD issues.

External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Inform Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients

Routine clinical meropenem therapeutic drug monitoring data can be applied to model-informed precision dosing. The current study aimed to evaluate the adequacy and predictive capabilities of the published models with routine meropenem data and identify the dosing adaptations using a priori and Bayesian estimation. For this, 14 meropenem models for the external evaluation carried out on an independent cohort of 134 patients with 205 meropenem concentrations were encoded in NONMEM 7.3. The performance was determined using: 1) prediction-based and simulation-based diagnostics; and 2) predicted meropenem concentrations by a priori prediction using patient covariates only; and Bayesian forecasting using previous observations. The clinical implications were assessed according to the required dose adaptations using the meropenem concentrations. All assessments were stratified based on the patients with or without continuous renal replacement therapy. Although none of the models passed all tests, the model by Muro et al. showed the least bias. Bayesian forecasting could improve the predictability over an a priori approach, with a relative bias of −11.63–68.89% and −302.96%–130.37%, and a relative root mean squared error of 34.99–110.11% and 14.78–241.81%, respectively. A dosing change was required in 40.00–68.97% of the meropenem observation results after Bayesian forecasting. In summary, the published models couldn’t adequately describe the meropenem pharmacokinetics of our center. Although the selection of an initial meropenem dose with a priori prediction is challenging, the further model-based analysis combining therapeutic drug monitoring could be utilized in the clinical practice of meropenem therapy.

C/MIC > 4: A Potential Instrument to Predict the Efficacy of Meropenem

This prospective study aimed to explore the determinants of meropenem trough concentration (Ctrough) in patients with bacterial pneumonia and to investigate the association between its concentration and efficacy. From January 2019 to December 2019, patients with pulmonary infections were prospectively enrolled from the intensive care unit. Factors affecting the meropenem trough concentration were analyzed, and a multiple linear regression model was constructed. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between Ctrough and clinical efficacy. A total of 64 patients were enrolled, in whom 210 meropenem concentrations were measured. Of the total, 60.9% (39/64) were considered clinically successful after treatment. Ctrough may increase with increased blood urea nitrogen, albumin, and concomitant antifungal use. By contrast, concentration may decrease with increased endogenous creatinine clearance rate. Six variables, including Ctrough/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) > 4, were associated with the efficacy of meropenem. There was an independent correlation between Ctrough/MIC > 4 and efficacy after fully adjusting for confounding factors. Based upon renal function indexes, it is possible to predict changes in meropenem concentration and adjust the dosage precisely and individually. Ctrough/MIC > 4 is a potential instrument to predict successful treatment with meropenem.

Meropenem Target Attainment and Population Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Septic Patients with Preserved or Increased Renal Function

Purpose

Critically ill patients with preserved or increased renal function have been shown to be at risk of underexposure to meropenem. Although many meropenem population pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been published, there is no large prospective population PK study with rich sampling focusing on patients most at risk of suboptimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate PK/PD target attainment and to perform a thorough covariate screening using population PK modelling of meropenem in septic patients with preserved or increased renal function.

Patients and Methods

A single-centre prospective observational PK study was performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospitals Leuven. Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and treated with meropenem in the ICU were screened for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received renal replacement therapy or had an estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology collaboration equation <70 mL/min/1.73m² on the day of PK sampling. Successful PK/PD target attainment was defined as an unbound meropenem trough concentration above 2 mg/L or 8 mg/L. Population PK modelling was performed with NONMEM7.4.

Results

In total, 58 patients were included, contributing 345 plasma samples over 70 dosing intervals. The 2 mg/L and 8 mg/L targets were successfully attained in 46% and 11% of all dosing intervals, respectively. A two-compartment population PK model with linear elimination and interindividual variability on clearance best described meropenem PK. The estimated creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation was the only covariate retained during population PK analysis.

Conclusion

This study provided detailed insight into meropenem PK in critically ill patients with preserved or increased renal function. We observed poor PK/PD target attainment, for which renal function was the only significant covariate.

Trial Registration

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03560557).

The Interplay between Host Defense, Infection, and Clinical Status in Septic Patients: A Narrative Review

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs. Despite significant morbidity and mortality throughout the world, its pathogenesis and mechanisms are not clearly understood. In this narrative review, we aimed to summarize the recent developments in our understanding of the hallmarks of sepsis pathogenesis (immune and adaptive immune response, the complement system, the endothelial disfunction, and autophagy) and highlight novel laboratory diagnostic approaches. Clinical management is also discussed with pivotal consideration for antimicrobic therapy management in particular settings, such as intensive care unit, altered renal function, obesity, and burn patients.

Are Antibiotics Appropriately Dosed in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance? A Narrative Review

AIMS

Augmented renal clearance (ARC), which is commonly defined as increased renal clearance above 130 ml/min/1.73 m², is a common phenomenon among critically ill patients. The increased elimination rate of drugs through the kidneys in patients with ARC can increase the risk of treatment failure due to the exposure to subtherapeutic serum concentrations of medications and affect the optimal management of infections, length of hospital stay, and outcomes. The main goal of this review article is to summarize the recommendations for appropriate dosing of antibiotics in patients with ARC.

METHODS

This article is a narrative review of the articles that evaluated different dosing regimens of antibiotics in patients with ARC. The keywords "Augmented Renal Clearance," "Critically ill patients," "Drug dosing," "Serum concentration," "Beta-lactams," "Meropenem," "Imipenem," "Glycopeptide," "Vancomycin," "Teicoplanin," "Linezolid," "Colistin," "Aminoglycosides," "Amikacin," "Gentamycin," "Fluoroquinolones," "Ciprofloxacin," and "Levofloxacin" were searched in Scopus, Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, and pediatric, nonhuman, and non-English studies were excluded.

RESULTS

PK properties of antibiotics including lipophilicity or hydrophilicity, protein binding, the volume of distribution, and elimination rate that affect drug concentration should be considered along with PD parameters for drug dosing in critically ill patients with ARC.

CONCLUSION

This review recommends a dosing protocol for some antibiotics to help the appropriate dosing of antibiotics in ARC and decrease the risk of subtherapeutic exposure that may be observed while receiving conventional dosing regimens in critically ill patients with ARC.

Dosing strategies of imipenem in neonates based on pharmacometric modelling and simulation

OBJECTIVES

Imipenem is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent used in critically ill neonates after failure of first-line treatments. Few studies have described imipenem disposition in this population. The objectives of our study were: (i) to characterize imipenem population pharmacokinetics (PK) in a cohort of neonates; and (ii) to conduct model-based simulations to evaluate the performance of six different dosing regimens aiming at optimizing PK target attainment.

METHODS

A total of 173 plasma samples from 82 neonates were collected over 15 years at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. The majority of study subjects were preterm neonates with a median gestational age (GA) of 27 weeks (range: 24-41), a postnatal age (PNA) of 21 days (2-153) and a body weight (BW) of 1.16 kg (0.5-4.1). PK data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM).

RESULTS

A one-compartment model best characterized imipenem disposition. Population PK parameters estimates of CL and volume of distribution were 0.21 L/h and 0.73 L, with an interpatient variability (CV%) of 20.1% on CL in a representative neonate (GA 27 weeks, PNA 21 days, BW 1.16 kg, serum creatinine, SCr 46.6 μmol/L). GA and PNA exhibited the greatest impact on PK parameters, followed by SCr. These covariates explained 36% and 15% of interindividual variability in CL, respectively.Simulated regimens using a dose of 20-25 mg/kg every 6-12 h according to postnatal age led to the highest PTA (T>MIC over 100% of time).

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing adjustment according to BW, GA and PNA optimizes imipenem exposure in neonates.

Meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with or without burn treated with or without continuous veno-venous hemofiltration

Introduction

Severe burn injury involves widespread skin and tissue damage leading to systemic inflammation, hypermetabolism and multi‐organ failure. The hypermetabolic phase of burn injury has been associated with increased systemic antibiotic clearance; however, critical illness in the absence of burn may also induce similar physiologic changes. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often implemented in critically ill patients and may also affect antibiotic clearance. Although the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem has been described in both the burn and non‐burn critically ill populations, direct comparative data is lacking.

Methods

For this study, we evaluated PK parameters of meropenem from 23 critically ill patients, burn or non‐burn, treated with or without continuous veno‐venous haemofiltration (CVVH) to determine the contribution of burn and CVVH to the variability of therapeutic meropenem levels.

Results

A two‐compartment model best described the data and revealed creatinine clearance (CrCl) and total burn surface area (TBSA) as significant covariates on clearance (CL) and peripheral volume of distribution (Vp), respectively. Of interest, non‐burn patients on CVVH displayed an overall lower inherent CL as compared to burn patients on CVVH (6.43 vs. 12.85 L/h). Probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations revealed augmented renal clearance (ARC) may necessitate dose adjustments, but TBSA and CVVH would not.

Conclusions

We recommend a standard dose of 1000 mg every 8 hours; however, if ARC is suspected, or the severity of illness requires a more stringent therapeutic target, we recommend a loading dose of 1000–2000 mg infused over 30 minutes to 1 hour followed by continuous infusion (3000–6000 mg over 24 hours), or intermittent infusion of 2000 mg every 8 hours.

Does Prolonged Infusion Time Really Improve the Efficacy of Meropenem Therapy? A Prospective Study in Critically Ill Patients

Introduction

Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic, which has demonstrated excellent antimicrobial activity against gram-negative clinical isolates. It is also commonly used in critically ill patients. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of meropenem in critically ill patients and whether prolonged injection duration is really beneficial to meropenem therapy.

Methods

We included 209 samples in 64 patients in this prospective study. PPK analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were developed using Phoenix.

Results

A two-compartment model described the data adequately. Clearance (CL), volume (V), clearance of peripheral compartment (CL₂), and volume of peripheral compartment (V₂) were 6.15 l/h, 2.83 l/h, 17.40 l, and 17.48 l, respectively. Creatinine clearance and uric acid were significant covariates. Patients with creatinine clearance ≤ 60 ml/min and uric acid > 400 μmol/l could achieve the target > 90% under the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 mg/l, even with the administration dose of 500 mg/8 h with a 2-h infusion. Prolonging the infusion time significantly improved the therapeutic effect when MIC < 4. However, for the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of 100% fT > MIC and 100% fT > 4 MIC, no significant statistical difference was observed in critically ill patients.

Conclusions

Critically ill patients with lower creatinine clearance and higher uric acid levels tended to need a lower dosage of meropenem. Prolonged infusion time was not always beneficial for those who needed a higher therapeutic target (100% fT > MIC, 100% fT > 4 MIC) or with MIC > 4 mg/l. Increasing dose or alternative therapeutic strategies may be required for critically ill patients with drug-resistant or severe infections. The study is of great significance to guide the rational use of meropenem in critically ill patients.

Trial Registration

The trial was registered in the China Clinical Trial (ChiCTR1900020672). Registered on 12 January 2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00551-2.

Meropenem is commonly used empirically or targeted in critically ill patients for bacterial infection. Many studies have reported that prolonged infusion time can improve the efficacy of meropenem therapy. However, we are skeptical about that. Meanwhile, prolonged injections can sometimes cause mobility problems for patients. A quantitative method is used to evaluate meropenem use. It is called the population pharmacokinetic model or pharmacodynamic study. Using this method, we found two significant influencing factors of meropenem metabolism: creatinine clearance and uric acid level. It is likely that patients with a lower level of creatinine clearance and a high uric acid level tend to require lower dosages of meropenem. As for the effect of infusion time, Monte Carlo simulation was used, which can do 3000 simulations on an individual. The result was complex. We found infusion time was beneficial only when bacteria were sensitive to meropenem. The evidence suggests that prolonged injection duration sometimes does not significantly improve the outcome of antimicrobial therapy.

Meropenem Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment in Critically Ill Patients Are Not Affected by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Existing evidence is inconclusive whether meropenem dosing should be adjusted in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Therefore, the aim of this observational matched cohort study was to evaluate the effect of ECMO on pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and target attainment (TA) of meropenem. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) simultaneously treated with meropenem and ECMO were eligible. Patients were matched 1:1, based on renal function and body weight, with non-ECMO ICU patients. Meropenem blood sampling was performed over one or two dosing intervals. Population PK modelling was performed using NONMEM7.5. TA was defined as free meropenem concentrations >2 or 8 mg/L (i.e., 1 or 4× minimal inhibitory concentration, respectively) throughout the whole dosing interval. In total, 25 patients were included, contributing 27 dosing intervals. The overall TA was 56% and 26% for the 2 mg/L and 8 mg/L target, respectively. Population PK modelling identified estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology equation and body weight, but not ECMO, as significant predictors. In conclusion, TA of meropenem was confirmed to be poor under standard dosing in critically ill patients but was not found to be influenced by ECMO. Future studies should focus on applying dose optimisation strategies for meropenem based on renal function, regardless of ECMO.

Continuous renal replacement therapy with the addition of CytoSorb cartridge in critically ill patients with COVID-19 plus acute kidney injury: A case-series

Our aim was to investigate continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with CytoSorb cartridge for patients with life-threatening COVID-19 plus acute kidney injury (AKI), sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Of 492 COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU), 50 had AKI necessitating CRRT (10.16%) and were enrolled in the study. Upon ICU admission, all had AKI, ARDS, septic shock, and CRS. In addition to CRRT with CytoSorb, all received ARDS-net ventilation, prone positioning, plus empiric ribavirin, interferon beta-1b, antibiotics, hydrocortisone, and prophylactic anticoagulation. We retrospectively analyzed inflammatory biomarkers, oxygenation, organ function, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length-of-stay, and mortality on day-28 post-ICU admission. Patients were 49.64 ± 8.90 years old (78% male) with body mass index of 26.70 ± 2.76 kg/m2 . On ICU admission, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II was 22.52 ± 1.1. Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score was 9.36 ± 2.068 and the ratio of partial arterial pressure of oxygen to fractional inspired concentration of oxygen (PaO2 /FiO2 ) was 117.46 ± 36.92. Duration of mechanical ventilation was 17.38 ± 7.39 days, ICU length-of-stay was 20.70 ± 8.83 days, and mortality 28 days post-ICU admission was 30%. Nonsurvivors had higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers, and more unresolved shock, ARDS, AKI, and pulmonary emboli (8% vs. 4%, P < .05) compared to survivors. After 2 ± 1 CRRT sessions with CytoSorb, survivors had decreased SOFA scores, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, D-dimers, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6; and increased PaO2 /FiO2 ratios, and lymphocyte counts (all P < .05). Receiver-operator-curve analysis showed that posttherapy values of interleukin-6 (cutoff point >620 pg/mL) predicted in-hospital mortality for critically ill COVID-19 patients (area-under-the-curve: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.93; P = .001). No side effects of therapy were recorded. In this retrospective case-series, CRRT with the CytoSorb cartridge provided a safe rescue therapy in life-threatening COVID-19 with associated AKI, ARDS, sepsis, and hyperinflammation.

Evaluation of the MeroRisk Calculator, A User-Friendly Tool to Predict the Risk of Meropenem Target Non-Attainment in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

The MeroRisk-calculator, an easy-to-use tool to determine the risk of meropenem target non-attainment after standard dosing (1000 mg; q8h), uses a patient's creatinine clearance and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen. In clinical practice, however, the MIC is rarely available. The objectives were to evaluate the MeroRisk-calculator and to extend risk assessment by including general pathogen sensitivity data.

METHODS

Using a clinical routine dataset (155 patients, 891 samples), a direct data-based evaluation was not feasible. Thus, in step 1, the performance of a pharmacokinetic model was determined for predicting the measured concentrations. In step 2, the PK model was used for a model-based evaluation of the MeroRisk-calculator: risk of target non-attainment was calculated using the PK model and agreement with the MeroRisk-calculator was determined by a visual and statistical (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC)) analysis for MIC values 0.125-16 mg/L. The MeroRisk-calculator was extended to include risk assessment based on EUCAST-MIC distributions and cumulative-fraction-of-response analysis.

RESULTS

Step 1 showed a negligible bias of the PK model to underpredict concentrations (-0.84 mg/L). Step 2 revealed a high level of agreement between risk of target non-attainment predictions for creatinine clearances >50 mL/min (CCC = 0.990), but considerable deviations for patients <50 mL/min. For 27% of EUCAST-listed pathogens the median cumulative-fraction-of-response for the observed patients receiving standard dosing was < 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The MeroRisk-calculator was successfully evaluated: For patients with maintained renal function it allows a reliable and user-friendly risk assessment. The integration of pathogen-based risk assessment substantially increases the applicability of the tool.

Population pharmacokinetics and probability of target attainment in patients with sepsis under renal replacement therapy receiving continuous infusion of meropenem: Sustained low-efficiency dialysis and continuous veno-venous haemodialysis

AIMS

To describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and probability of target attainment (PTA) of continuous infusion (CI) of meropenem in septic patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS

Fifteen patients without RRT, 13 patients receiving sustained low-efficiency dialysis and 12 patients receiving continuous veno-venous haemodialysis were included. Population PK analysis with Monte Carlo simulations for different dosing regimens was performed. For minimum inhibitory concentration 2 mg/L was chosen. The target was set as 50% time ≥4× minimum inhibitory concentration.

RESULTS

The PK of meropenem was best described by a 1-compartment model with linear elimination. Serum creatinine, residual diuresis and time on RRT, with no difference between sustained low-efficiency dialysis and continuous veno-venous haemodialysis, were found to be significant covariates affecting clearance, explaining >20% of the clearance between subject variability. PTA analysis showed that in patients with RRT, 2 g/24 h, meropenem CI achieved a PTA of 95%. In patients without RRT, the target was achieved with 3 g/24 h CI or prolonged infusion of 1 g meropenem over 8 hours but not with bolus application of 1 g meropenem for 8 hours. Only 2 patients (both without RRT) had meropenem concentrations below the target level. However, approximately half of the patients with RRT receiving CI 3 g/24 h meropenem had toxic concentrations.

CONCLUSION

We found relevant PK variability for meropenem CI in septic patients with or without RRT, leading to a substantial risk for overdosing in patients with RRT. This finding highlights the strong demand for personalized dosing in critically ill patients.

Key Challenges in Providing Effective Antibiotic Therapy for Critically Ill Patients with Bacterial Sepsis and Septic Shock

Early initiation of effective antibiotic therapy is vitally important for saving the lives of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock. The susceptibility of the infecting pathogen and the ability of the selected dosage regimen to safely achieve the required antibiotic exposure need to be carefully considered to achieve a high probability of a successful outcome. Critically ill patients commonly experience substantial pathophysiological changes that impact the functions of various organs, including the kidneys. Many antibiotics are predominantly renally eliminated and thus renal function is a major determinant of the regimen needed to achieve the required antibiotic exposure. However, currently, there is a paucity of guidelines to inform antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients, including those with sepsis or septic shock. This paper briefly reviews methods that are commonly used in critically ill patients to provide a measure of renal function, and approaches that describe the relationship between the exposure to an antibiotic and its antibacterial effects. Two common conditions that very substantially complicate the use of antibiotics in critically ill patients with sepsis, unstable renal function, and augmented renal clearance, are considered in detail and their potential therapeutic implications are explored. Suggestions are provided on how treatment of bacterial infections in critically ill patients with sepsis might be improved. Of high potential are model-informed approaches that aim to individualize initial treatment regimens based on patient and bacterial characteristics, with refinement of regimens during treatment in response to monitoring antibiotic concentrations, responsive measures of renal function, and other important clinical data.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Augmented Renal Clearance

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether established ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) dosing is adequate for patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) and bacterial infection.

METHODS

ARC (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 130 mL/min) was confirmed by directly measured CrCl in 11 critically ill patients in a phase 1 pharmacokinetics study. Patients received 3 g C/T (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) as a 60-minute intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the start of the infusion. Noncompartmental analyses were conducted on concentration data. The following pharmacodynamic targets were evaluated: time that free (unbound) drug concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 μg/mL for ceftolozane and time that the unbound concentration exceeded the 1 μg/mL target threshold (fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL) for > 20% of the dosing interval for tazobactam. Safety was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, clearance and volume of distribution at steady state (V_ss) were 236 (118) h*µg/mL, 10.4 (4.5) L/h and 30.8 (10.8) L, respectively, for ceftolozane; and 35.5 (18.5) h*µg/mL, 35.3 (16.5) L/h and 54.8 (20.1) L, respectively, for tazobactam. Clearance and V_ss were higher for both ceftolozane and tazobactam in patients with ARC compared with healthy individuals. The mean estimated ceftolozane fT>MIC at 4 µg/mL was 86.4%; the mean estimated tazobactam fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL was 54.9%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ARC, a 3 g C/T dose met respective pharmacodynamic targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02387372.

Meropenem use and therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice: a literature review

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Meropenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, is widely prescribed for the treatment of life-threatening infections. The main parameter associated with its therapeutic success is the percentage of time that the levels remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration. Inadequate levels of meropenem can lead to therapeutic failure and increase the possibility of microbial resistance. The employment of strategies involving dose regimens and drug pharmacodynamics has become increasingly important to optimize therapies. In the present study, we conducted a review with the purpose of assembling information about the clinical use of meropenem and therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHODS

A literature review emphasizing the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem in clinical practice has been done. To identify articles related to the topic, we performed a standardized search from January 21, 2020 to December 21, 2020, using specific descriptors in PubMed, Lilacs and Embase.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In total, 35 studies were included in the review. The daily dose of meropenem commonly ranged from 3 to 6 g/day. Critically ill patients and those with impaired renal function appear to be the most suitable patients for the application of meropenem TDM, in order to guide therapy. We observed that most of the studies recommend TDM and that, in nine locations, the TDM of meropenem and of other beta-lactams is a routine practice. TDM data can help to maximize the clinical outcomes of the treatment with meropenem. It can also improve the patient care by providing suitable levels of meropenem, guiding the most appropriate dose regimens, which is the main parameter associated with therapeutic success.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The findings from this review suggest that the therapeutic monitoring of meropenem can be beneficial, since it adjusts the treatment and aids clinical outcomes. It does so by indicating the appropriate dosage and preventing failure, toxicity and possible antimicrobial resistance. The multidisciplinary effort, basic knowledge and communication among the medical team are also essential.

Comparison of two empirical prolonged infusion dosing regimens for meropenem in patients with septic shock: A two-center pilot study

BACKGROUND

Due to high pharmacokinetic variability, standard doses of meropenem are frequently inadequate in septic patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring of meropenem is not widely available; therefore, improved empiric dosing recommendations are needed.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the attainment of pharmacologic targets for two common empirical dosing regimens for meropenem in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

Two empiric dosing schemes for meropenem were compared using extended infusions (120 minutes) in 32 patients with septic shock in the intensive care units at two different hospitals. One regimen was 3 × 2 g meropenem/24 h for two days, followed by 3 × 1 g meropenem/24 h; the other regimen was 4 × 1 g meropenem/24 h. Serum meropenem concentrations were measured for the first 72 h of therapy, and pharmacokinetic modelling was performed to define the percentage of time the free drug concentration was above various target MICs for each regimen (%fT_>MIC).

RESULTS

Both regimens led to a sufficiently high %fT_>MIC for pathogens with target MICs < 4 mg/L. When higher MICs were targeted, the %fT_>MIC of 4 × 1 g meropenem decreased faster than that of 3 × 2 g meropenem. At high MICs of 32 mg/L, both dosing regimens failed to provide appropriate drug concentrations. Renal function was a significant covariate of target attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study can guide clinicians in their choice of an empirical dosing regimen for meropenem. If pathogens with low MICs (< 4 mg/L) are targeted, both dosing regimens are adequate, whereas more resistant strains require higher doses.

Clinical Effectiveness of a High Dose Versus the Standard Dose of Meropenem in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Caused by Multidrugresistant Bacteria: A Randomized, Single-blind Clinical Trial

Meropenem standard doses are based on the minimum inhibitory concentration of sensitive pathogens and the pharmacokinetic parameter of not critically ill patients. We compared the efficacy of high versus standard dose of meropenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). ; Methods: 24 out of 34 eligible patients were randomized to receive meropenem 3 g q8h (high dose group, 11 patients) or 2 g q8h (standard-dose group, 13 patients) as a 3h infusion. The primary outcome was considered as clinical success that was defined as stable hemodynamic, improved sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, stable or improved PaO2/FiO2 after 7 days. Sputum culture was taken before the intervention. ; Results: Clinical success rate was not significantly different between the high and standard-dose group (54.5% vs. 38.5%, P= 0.431). There was a significant difference in the reduction of clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) compared to a high dose to the standard group (P=0.038). SOFA score declined significantly in the high dose group throughout the study (P=0.006). A shorter duration of VAP treatment was recorded in the high dose group (P=0.061). We did not observe any significant adverse event related to meropenem. Acinetobacter spp. (34.8%), Klebsiella spp. (32.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.5%) isolated more frequently from sputum cultures. ; Conclusion: Treatment with the high dose of meropenem seems to be safe. However, it did not provide a significantly higher clinical success rate in comparison with the standard dose, but could be considered as an appropriate empirical treatment in patients with severe infection due to reduction in SOFA and CPIS. ; The trial protocol was registered with IRCT.ir (registration number IRCT2010010700 3014N19 in April 2018).

Recommendation of Antimicrobial Dosing Optimization During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) is more and more widely used in patients for various indications recent years. It is still intricate for clinicians to decide a suitable empiric antimicrobial dosing for patients receiving CRRT. Inappropriate doses of antimicrobial agents may lead to treatment failure or drug resistance of pathogens. CRRT factors, patient individual conditions and drug pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics are the main elements effecting the antimicrobial dosing adjustment. With the development of CRRT techniques, some antimicrobial dosing recommendations in earlier studies were no longer appropriate for clinical use now. Here, we reviewed the literatures involving in new progresses of antimicrobial dosages, and complied the updated empirical dosing strategies based on CRRT modalities and effluent flow rates. The following antimicrobial agents were included for review: flucloxacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, sulbactam, meropenem, imipenem, panipenem, biapenem, ertapenem, doripenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, azithromycin, tigecycline, polymyxin B, colistin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, daptomycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconzole, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B, acyclovir, ganciclovir, oseltamivir, and peramivir.

Validation and clinical application of a multiplex high performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry assay for the monitoring of plasma concentrations of 12 antibiotics in patients with severe bacterial infections

OBJECTIVE

Unpredictable pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in patients with life-threatening bacterial infections is associated with drug under- or overdosing. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may guide dosing adjustment aimed at maximizing antibacterial efficacy and minimizing toxicity. Rapid and accurate analytical methods are key for real-time TDM. Our objective was to develop a robust high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC-MS/MS) for multiplex quantification of plasma concentrations of 12 antibiotics: imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin/tazobactam, amoxicillin, flucloxacillin, rifampicin, daptomycin.

METHODS

A single extraction procedure consisting in methanol plasma protein precipitation and H₂O dilution was used for all analytes. After chromatographic separation on an Acquity UPLC HSS-T3 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm (Waters®) column, quantification was performed by electro-spray ionisation-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry with selected reaction monitoring detection. Antibiotics were divided in two pools of calibration according to the frequency of analyses requests in the hospital routine antibiotic TDM program. Stable isotopically-labelled analogues were used as internal standards. A single analytical run lasted less than 9 min.

RESULTS

The method was validated based on FDA recommendations, including assessment of extraction yield (96-113.8%), matrix effects, and analytical recovery (86.3-99.6%). The method was sensitive (lower limits of quantification 0.02-0.5 µg/mL), accurate (intra/inter-assay bias -11.3 to +12.7%) and precise (intra/inter-assay CVs 2.1-11.5%) over the clinically relevant plasma concentration ranges (upper limits of quantification 20-160 µg/mL). The application of the TDM assay was illustrated with clinical cases that highlight the impact on patients' management of an analytical assay providing information with short turn-around time on antibiotic plasma concentration.

CONCLUSION

This simple, robust high-throughput multiplex HPLC-MS/MS assay for simultaneous quantification of plasma concentrations of 12 daily used antibiotics is optimally suited for clinically efficient real-time TDM.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure alters meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with continuous hemodialysis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Infection and sepsis are a main cause of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Adequate dosing of antimicrobial therapy is of central importance to improve outcome. Liver failure may alter antibiotic drug concentrations via changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and compared it to critically ill patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients received meropenem 1 g tid short-term infusion (SI). Meropenem serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed followed by Monte Carlo simulations of (A) meropenem 1 g tid SI, (B) 2 g loading plus 1 g prolonged infusion tid (C) 2 g tid SI, and (D) 2 g loading and continuous infusion of 3 g/day on days 1 and 7. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed for 4× the epidemiological cut-off values for Enterobacterales (4 × 0.25 mg/L) and Pseudomonas spp. (4 × 2 mg/L).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in this study. Of these, 8 patients suffered from ACLF. A two-compartment model with linear clearance from the central compartment described meropenem pharmacokinetics. The peripheral volume of distribution (V₂) was significantly higher in ACLF compared to NLF (38.6L versus 19.7L, p = .05). PTA for Enterobacterales was achieved in 100% for all dosing regimens. PTA for Pseudomonas spp. in ACLF on day 1/7 was: A: 18%/80%, B: 94%/88%, C: 85%/98% D: 100%/100% and NLF: A: 48%/65%, B: 91%/83%, C: 91%/93%, D: 100%/100%.

CONCLUSION

ALCF patients receiving CVVHD had a higher V₂ and may require a higher loading dose of meropenem. For Pseudomonas, high doses or continuous infusion are required to reach PTA in ACLF patients.

Clinical outcomes of empirical high-dose meropenem in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Appropriate antimicrobial dosing is challenging because of changes in pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters and an increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms in critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an empirical therapy of high-dose versus standard-dose meropenem in sepsis and septic shock patients.

Methods

We performed a prospective randomized open-label study to compare the changes of modified sequential organ failure assessment (mSOFA) score and other clinical outcomes of the high-dose meropenem (2-g infusion over 3 h every 8 h) versus the standard-dose meropenem (1-g infusion over 3 h every 8 h) in sepsis and septic shock patients. Patients' characteristics, clinical and microbiological outcomes, 14 and 28-day mortality, vasopressor- and ventilator-free days, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital-free days, percent of the time of antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%T>MIC), and safety were assessed.

Results

Seventy-eight patients were enrolled. Median delta mSOFA was comparable between two groups (- 1 in the high-dose group vs. - 1 in the standard-dose group; P value = 0.75). There was no difference between the two groups regarding clinical and microbiological cure, 14- and 28-day mortality, vasopressor- and ventilator-free days, and ICU- and hospital-free days. In patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) with a mSOFA score ≥ 7, the high-dose group demonstrated significantly better microbiological cure compared with the standard-dose group (75% (9/12 patients) vs. 20% (2/10 patients); P value = 0.03). Likewise, the high-dose group presented higher microbiological cure rate in patients admitted from ED who had either APACHE II score > 20 (83.3% (10/12) vs. 28.6% (2/7); P value = 0.045) or on mechanical ventilator (87.5% (7/8) vs. 23.1% (3/13); P value = 0.008) than the standard-dose group. Adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

Empirical therapy with the high-dose meropenem presented comparable clinical outcomes to the standard-dose meropenem in sepsis and septic shock patients. Besides, subgroup analysis manifested superior microbiological cure rate in sepsis or septic shock patients admitted from ED.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03344627, registered on November 17, 2017.

Concentration of meropenem in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury before and after initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy: a prospective observational trial

Background

The effect of renal replacement therapy on drug concentrations in patients with sepsis has not been fully elucidated because the pharmacokinetic properties of many antimicrobials are influenced by both pathophysiological and treatment-related factors. The aim of this study was to determine meropenem concentrations in patients with sepsis before and after the initiation of continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-CVVHD).

Methods

The study included 15 critically ill patients undergoing RCA-CVVHD due to sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. All participants received 2 g of meropenem every 8 h in a prolonged infusion lasting 3 h. Meropenem concentrations were measured in blood plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Blood samples were obtained at six-time points prior to and at six-time points after introducing RCA-CVVHD.

Results

The median APACHE IV and SOFA scores on admission were 118 points (interquartile range [IQR] 97–134 points) and 19.5 points (IQR 18–21 points), respectively. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentrations of meropenem measured directly before RCA-CVVHD and during the first 450 min of the procedure. The drug concentration reached its peak 2 h after initiating the infusion and then steadily declined.

Conclusions

The concentration of high-dose meropenem (2 g every 8 h) administered in a prolonged infusion was similar before and after the introduction of RCA-CVVHD in patients with sepsis who developed acute kidney injury.

Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb shows a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality in ICU patients with septic shock: a propensity-score-weighted retrospective study

Background and aims

Innovative treatment modalities have not yet shown a clinical benefit in patients with septic shock. To reduce severe cytokinaemia, CytoSorb as an add-on to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) showed promising results in case reports. However, there are no clinical trials investigating outcomes.

Methods

In this investigator-initiated retrospective study, patients with septic shock were treated with CRRT + CytoSorb (n = 67) or CRRT alone (n = 49). The primary outcome was the 28-day all-cause mortality rate. Patients were weighted by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights (sIPTW) to overcome differences in baseline characteristics.

Results

At the start of therapy, CytoSorb-treated patients had higher lactate levels (p < 0.001), lower mean arterial pressure (p = 0.007) and higher levels of noradrenaline (p < 0.001) compared to the CRRT group. For CytoSorb, the mean predicted mortality rate based on a SOFA of 13.8 (n = 67) was 75% (95%CI 71–79%), while the actual 28-day mortality rate was 48% (mean difference − 27%, 95%CI − 38 to − 15%, p < 0.001). For CRRT, based on a SOFA of 12.8 (n = 49), the mean predicted versus observed mortality was 68% versus 51% (mean difference − 16.9% [95%CI − 32.6 to − 1.2%, p = 0.035]). By sIPTW analysis, patients treated with CytoSorb had a significantly lower 28-day mortality rate compared to CRRT alone (53% vs. 72%, respectively, p = 0.038). Independent predictors of 28-day mortality in the CytoSorb group were the presence of pneumosepsis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.47, p = 0.029), higher levels of lactate at the start of CytoSorb (aOR 1.15, p = 0.031) and older age (aOR per 10 years 1.67, p = 0.034).

Conclusions

CytoSorb was associated with a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality. By IPTW analysis, intervention with CytoSorb may be associated with a decreased all-cause mortality at 28 days compared to CRRT alone.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2588-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.