PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

Management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infections in adult solid organ transplant recipients: GESITRA-IC/SEIMC, CIBERINFEC, and SET recommendations update

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients continue to pose a significant threat despite advances in diagnostics and treatments. The last international consensus guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) on the management of MDR GNB in adult solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were published in 2018, underscoring the need for an update to incorporate recent advances, particularly the availability of new drugs that may improve the current standard of care. A working group consisting of members from the Study Group of Infection in Transplantation and Immunocompromised Hosts (GESITRA-IC) of SEIMC, the Center for Biomedical Research Network in Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET) developed consensus-based recommendations for managing MDR GNB infections during the transplant procedure. Recommendations were categorized based on evidence quality and strength, utilizing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.

Prevalence of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM) gene in a selected population of drug-resistant clinical isolates

OBJECTIVES

Drug-resistant Enterobacterales carrying carbapenem-resistant genes cause severe infections in clinical settings worldwide. Among these, the New Dehli Metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM) gene is significantly prevalent and associated with high morbidity. This study was designed to investigate the susceptibility profiling of Carbapenem-Resistant-Enterobacterales (CRE), prevalence of blaNDM and its variants, and associated risk factors.

METHODS

CRE isolates from a tertiary care hospital, in Islamabad, Pakistan, were identified and the susceptibility testing was performed using disc diffusion method. MICs were determined for imipenem, tigecycline, and colistin through E-strips and microbroth dilution method respectively. For molecular characterization and typing of the blaNDM gene, PCR products were sequenced, and the phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA ver 6.0 software.

RESULTS

Among 5,134 clinical samples, 42.13% (n = 2,163) yielded pathogens including 42.58% (n = 921) Enterobacterales. On further screening, 39.52% (n = 364) of Enterobacterales were identified as CRE. The blaNDM gene was detected in 75.27% (n = 274) in CRE isolates, comprising blaNDM-1 (44%), blaNDM-5 (53%), and blaNDM-7 (3%) variants. Tigecycline (86.7%) and colistin (100%) were most effective antimicrobial agents with MICs ranging from 0.064 to 8 and 0.125-1 µg/ml respectively. blaNDM-1-harboring bacteria exhibited high antimicrobial resistance compared to blaNDM-5 and blaNDM-7. Cefiderocol was 75.6% and ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam was 97.08% effective against blaNDM-harboring bacteria. The phylogenetic analysis indicated that blaNDM variants showed close genetic relationships and homology to the previously described sequences in GenBank databases having diverse connection with worldwide sequences.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of blaNDM in our study has of great concern for clinical practice and public health. Clinicians are left with few therapeutic options. However, ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam may show therapeutic success. Continuous surveillance is crucial to monitorgenetic variations of continuously evolving blaNDM gene, which is essential for effective clinical management.

Amikacin treatment in patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia: impact of MIC on mortality

BACKGROUND

Recently, breakpoints of Enterobacterales to amikacin were changed from MIC ≤ 16 mg/L to MIC ≤ 4 mg/L based mainly on laboratory data with little supporting clinical evidence. Our aim was to investigate the relation between MIC of Enterobacterales to amikacin and mortality among patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia from a urinary tract source treated with amikacin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-centre study included patients with Enterobacterales urinary source bacteraemia treated with amikacin, with Low (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L) and High (MIC 8 or 16 mg/L) MICs. A cohort of patients treated with ertapenem was used to assess if amikacin MIC is a marker of severity independent of antimicrobial treatment. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to assess risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

We included 85 patients, 46 (54.1%) were male, and mean age was 79.0 years (SD 11.7). Sixty-one patients (71.8%) had Low MIC and 24 (28.2%) had High MIC. Thirty-day mortality was 8.2% and 29.2% in the Low and High MIC groups, respectively (P = 0.031). Risk factors for 30-day mortality were age, infection by Enterobacterales other than Escherichia coli and high amikacin MIC. In a cohort of 88 patients treated with ertapenem, amikacin MIC was not associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a relation between higher amikacin MIC levels (8 and 16 mg/L) and increased 30-day mortality in patients treated with amikacin for bacteraemia secondary to a urinary source. These findings support the new CLSI breakpoint change of Enterobacterales to amikacin.

Real-Time TDM-Guided Optimal Joint PK/PD Target Attainment of Continuous Infusion Piperacillin-Tazobactam Monotherapy Is an Effective Carbapenem-Sparing Strategy for Treating Non-Severe ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales Secondary Bloodstream Infections: Findings from a Prospective Pilot Study

(1) Objectives: To assess the impact of optimal joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy on the microbiological outcome of documented ESBL-producing Enterobacterlaes secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs). (2) Methods: Patients hospitalized in the period January 2022-October 2023, having a documented secondary BSI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and being eligible for definitive targeted CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy according to specific pre-defined inclusion criteria (i.e., absence of septic shock at onset; favorable clinical evolution in the first 48 h after starting treatment; low-intermediate risk primary infection source) were prospectively enrolled. A real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program was adopted for optimizing (PK/PD) target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of both piperacillin and tazobactam were measured, and the free fractions (f) were calculated based on theoretical protein binding. The joint PK/PD target attainment was considered optimal whenever the piperacillin fCss/MIC ratio was >4 and the tazobactam fCss/target concentration (CT) ratio was >1 (quasi-optimal or suboptimal if only one or neither of the two thresholds were achieved, respectively). Univariate analysis was carried out for assessing variables potentially associated with failure in achieving the optimal joint PK/PD target of piperacillin-tazobactam and microbiological eradication. (3) Results: Overall, 35 patients (median age 79 years; male 51.4%) were prospectively included. Secondary BSIs resulted from urinary tract infections as a primary source in 77.2% of cases. The joint PK/PD target attainment was optimal in as many as 97.1% of patients (34/35). Microbiological eradication occurred in 91.4% of cases (32/35). Attaining the quasi-optimal/suboptimal joint PK/PD target of CI piperacillin-tazobactam showed a trend toward a higher risk of microbiological failure (33.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.08) (4) Conclusions: Real-time TDM-guided optimal joint PK/PD target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy may represent a valuable and effective carbapenem-sparing strategy when dealing with non-severe ESBL-producing Enterobacterales secondary BSIs.

Evaluation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam ETEST for the Detection of OXA-1 Resistance Mechanism among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

Globally, piperacillin-tazobactam resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae is driven by OXA-1 beta-lactamases. Expression of bla_OXA-1 yields piperacillin-tazobactam MICs of 8 to 16 μg/mL, which straddle the susceptible/susceptible-dose dependent breakpoint set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute in 2022. Variability of the reference broth microdilution method (BMD) was evaluated by manufacturing BMD panels using 2 brands of piperacillin, 2 brands of tazobactam and 2 brands of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. In addition, ETEST, which harbors an intermediate dilution of 12 μg/mL was evaluated for the ability to differentiate isolates with and without bla_OXA-1. A collection of 200 E. coli and K. pneumoniae, of which 82 harbored a bla_OXA-1 gene, were tested. BMD variability was on average 1.3-fold, within the accepted 2-fold variability of MICs. However, categorical agreement (CA) between BMD reads was 74.0% for all isolates and 63.4% for those with a bla_OXA-1 gene and 81.3% for those without bla_OXA-1 detected (P = 0.004, Pearson's Chi Square). ETEST overall CA with the BMD mode was 68.0% and essential agreement (EA) was 80.5%. For isolates with bla_OXA-1, CA was 50.0% and EA was 69.5%, versus 80.5% and 88.1%, respectively, for isolates without bla_OXA-1 (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). All ETEST errors were major errors (false resistance) compared to BMD mode. However, the negative predictive value of the ETEST for the presence of bla_OXA-1 was 94.1%, compared to only 74.2% negative predictive value for BMD. Clinicians and microbiologists should be aware of the challenges associated with testing piperacillin-tazobactam in regions where bla_OXA-1 is prevalent.

Controversies over the management of infections caused by Amp-C- and ESBL-producing Enterobacterales : what questions remain for future studies?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The continuous rise in infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (e.g. extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ) is a major health concern. Carbapenems are regarded as the antibiotics of choice for the treatment of these infections. However, their indiscriminant use is not without consequences, and has contributed to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales .In this review, we discuss the available evidence supporting the use of other betalactams, nonbetalactams and the new betalactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLA/BLI) to treat these infections. We also analyze unresolved issues in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Piperacillin tazobactam (PTZ) was classically recommended as a carbapenem-sparing agent. However, data have emerged against its use and it is now a controversial recommendation. IDSA, European and British guidelines reject the empirical use of PTZ for these pathogens, reserving its use for rare clinical situations.Other issues that continue to generate debate are the use of extended infusion (3 h) PTZ, the use of older antibiotics, a shortened course of carbapenems and reserving the new BLA/BLI for these infections.

SUMMARY

New treatment strategies should be based on clinical evidence, local epidemiology and the microbiological activity of these drugs.

Pragmatic Comparison of Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus Carbapenems in Treating Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The effectiveness of piperacillin/tazobactam for managing nosocomial pneumonia caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae is unknown. To answer this question, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in two tertiary teaching hospitals of patients admitted between January 2018 and July 2021 with a diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia caused by ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae receiving either piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems within 24 h from the onset of pneumonia for at least 72 h. Clinical outcomes, including 28-day mortality and 14-day clinical and microbiological cure, were analyzed. Of the 136 total patients, 64 received piperacillin/tazobactam and 72 received carbapenems. The overall 28-day mortality was 19.1% (26/136). In the inverse probability of treatment weighted cohort, piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, as the 28-day mortality (OR, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.23–2.87, p = 0.748), clinical cure (OR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.38–2.35, p = 0.894), and microbiological cure (OR, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.53–2.30, p = 0.798) were comparable to those of carbapenems. Subgroup analyses also did not demonstrate any statistical differences. In conclusion, piperacillin/tazobactam could be an effective alternative to carbapenems for treating nosocomial pneumonia due to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae when the MICs are ≤8 mg/L.

Antimicrobial Challenge in Acute Care Surgery

The burden of infections in acute care surgery (ACS) is huge. Surgical emergencies alone account for three million admissions per year in the United States (US) with estimated financial costs of USD 28 billion per year. Acute care facilities and ACS patients represent boost sanctuaries for the emergence, development and transmission of infections and multi-resistant organisms. According to the World Health Organization, healthcare-associated infections affected around 4 million cases in Europe and 1.7 million in the US alone in 2011 with 39,000 and 99,000 directly attributable deaths, respectively. In this scenario, antimicrobial resistance arose as a public-health emergency that worsens patients' morbidity and mortality and increases healthcare costs. The optimal patient care requires the application of comprehensive evidence-based policies and strategies aiming at minimizing the impact of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial resistance, while optimizing the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The present review provides a snapshot of two hot topics, such as antimicrobial resistance and systemic inflammatory response, and three milestones of infection management, such as source control, infection prevention, and control and antimicrobial stewardship.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection after solid organ transplantation: Recent trends in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches

Background

Infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli (MDR GNB), in particular extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing (ESBL‐E) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a major threat in solid organ transplantation (SOT). Outcome prediction and therapy are challenging due to the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or well‐designed observational studies focused on this population.

Methods

Narrative review with a focus on the contributions provided by the ongoing multinational INCREMENT‐SOT consortium (ClinicalTrials identifier NCT02852902) in the fields of epidemiology and clinical management.

Results

The Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), the Group for Study of Infection in Transplantation of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GESITRA‐SEIMC), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) recently published their recommendations for the management of MDR GNB infections in SOT recipients. We revisit the SET/GESITRA‐SEIMC/REIPI document taking into consideration new evidence that emerged on the molecular epidemiology, prognostic stratification, and treatment of post‐transplant ESBL‐E and CRE infections. Results derived from the INCREMENT‐SOT consortium may support the therapeutic approach to post‐transplant bloodstream infection (BSI). The initiatives devoted to sparing the use of carbapenems in low‐risk ESBL‐E BSI or to repurposing existing non‐β‐lactam antibiotics for CRE in both non‐transplant and transplant patients are reviewed, as well as the eventual positioning in the specific SOT setting of recently approved antibiotics.

Conclusion

Due to the clinical complexity and relative rarity of ESBL‐E and CRE infections in SOT recipients, multinational cooperative efforts such as the INCREMENT‐SOT Project should be encouraged. In addition, RCTs focused on post‐transplant serious infection remain urgently needed.

European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine)

SCOPE

These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3^rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative pathogens are a major cause of resistance to expanded-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Since their discovery in the early 1980s, they have spread worldwide and an are now endemic in Enterobacterales isolated from both hospital-associated and community-acquired infections. As a result, they are a global public health concern. In the past, TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs were the predominant families of ESBLs. Today CTX-M-type enzymes are the most commonly found ESBL type with the CTX-M-15 variant dominating worldwide, followed in prevalence by CTX-M-14, and CTX-M-27 is emerging in certain parts of the world. The genes encoding ESBLs are often found on plasmids and harboured within transposons or insertion sequences, which has enabled their spread. In addition, the population of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli is dominated globally by a highly virulent and successful clone belonging to ST131. Today, there are many diagnostic tools available to the clinical microbiology laboratory and include both phenotypic and genotypic tests to detect β-lactamases. Unfortunately, when ESBLs are not identified in a timely manner, appropriate antimicrobial therapy is frequently delayed, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Several analyses of clinical trials have shown mixed results with regards to whether a carbapenem must be used to treat serious infections caused by ESBLs or whether some of the older β-lactam-β-lactamase combinations such as piperacillin/tazobactam are appropriate. Some of the newer combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam have demonstrated efficacy in patients. ESBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens will continue to be major contributor to antimicrobial resistance worldwide. It is essential that we remain vigilant about identifying them both in patient isolates and through surveillance studies.

Navigating treatment approaches for presumed ESBL-producing infections

ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) remain a significant global threat. In several regions of the world, ESBLs are produced by over half of Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae infections, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Though it is accepted that carbapenems are effective for the treatment of invasive ESBL-E infections, controversy remains as to whether carbapenem alternatives can be considered in select cases. Indiscriminate carbapenem use for the treatment of ESBL-E infections will likely further the international antimicrobial resistance crisis, underscoring the importance of investigating the role of non-carbapenem options. In this issue of JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, we present a PRO/CON debate exploring whether carbapenems are necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.