In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against isolates of Gram-negative pathogens from a range of infection sources: SIDERO-WT-2014-2018 studies in France

Cefiderocol - An effective antimicrobial for MDR infections but a challenge for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

PURPOSE

Cefiderocol is a novel cephalosporin-siderophore conjugate antibiotic that holds promise to thwart infections caused by multi-drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Its antibacterial activity against normally susceptible species is not affected by most β-lactamases, including metallo-β-lactamases. Due to the siderophore-mediated entry into the cell, the activity of cefiderocol is less affected by porin loss or active efflux resistance than many other β-lactam antibiotics. The aim of this study was to assess in vitro susceptibility to the cefiderocol of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli from clinical samples of hospitalized patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 102 clinical strains of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and non-fermentives from hospital centers in Łódź, Poland. Antimicrobial susceptibility to cefiderocol was tested by the minimum inhibitory concentration test strips and disc diffusion methods.

RESULTS

The obtained results turned out to be ambiguous, and the area of technical uncertainty made their interpretation very difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost of therapy with this antibiotic, and difficulties in interpreting the drug susceptibility are the limitations to the use of cefiderocol. Intensive work should be carried out to finally standardize an easily accessible and reliable method for the determination of susceptibility to cefiderocol.

Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are clinically important due to its intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antibiotics. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate antibiotic to treat S. maltophilia infection is a major challenge.

AIM

The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the global prevalence of antibiotic resistance among S. maltophilia isolates to the develop more effective therapeutic strategies.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed using the appropriate search syntax after searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases (May 2023). Statistical analysis was performed using Pooled and the random effects model in R and the metafor package. A total of 11,438 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 289 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULT

Present analysis indicated that the highest incidences of resistance were associated with doripenem (97%), cefoxitin (96%), imipenem and cefuroxime (95%), ampicillin (94%), ceftriaxone (92%), aztreonam (91%) and meropenem (90%) which resistance to Carbapenems is intrinsic. The lowest resistance rates were documented for minocycline (3%), cefiderocol (4%). The global resistance rate to TMP-SMX remained constant in two periods before and after 2010 (14.4% vs. 14.6%). A significant increase in resistance to tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam was observed before and after 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

Minocycline and cefiderocol can be considered the preferred treatment options due to low resistance rates, although regional differences in resistance rates to other antibiotics should be considered. The low global prevalence of resistance to TMP-SMX as a first-line treatment for S. maltophilia suggests that it remains an effective treatment option.

Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a last resort option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria, especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CR Acinetobacter baumannii. Monitoring global levels of cefiderocol non-susceptibility (CFDC-NS) is important.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically collate and examine studies investigating in vitro CFDC-NS and estimate the global prevalence of CFDC-NS against major Gram-negative pathogens.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Scopus, up to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible were studies reporting CFDC-NS in Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates.

RISK-OF-BIAS ASSESSMENT

Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed the risk of bias on the population, setting, and measurement (susceptibility testing) domains.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Binomial-Normal mixed-effects models were applied to estimate CFDC-NS prevalence by species, coresistance phenotype, and breakpoint definition (EUCAST, CLSI, and FDA). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

In all, 78 studies reporting 82 035 clinical isolates were analysed (87% published between 2020 and 2023). CFDC-NS prevalence (EUCAST breakpoints) was low overall but varied by species (S. maltophilia 0.4% [95% CI 0.2-0.7%], Enterobacterales 3.0% [95% CI 1.5-6.0%], P. aeruginosa 1.4% [95% CI 0.5-4.0%]) and was highest for A. baumannii (8.8%, 95% CI 4.9-15.2%). CFDC-NS was much higher in CR Enterobacterales (12.4%, 95% CI 7.3-20.0%) and CR A. baumannii (13.2%, 95% CI 7.8-21.5%), but relatively low for CR P. aeruginosa (3.5%, 95% CI 1.6-7.8%). CFDC-NS was exceedingly high in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (38.8%, 95% CI 22.6-58.0%), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing A. baumannii (44.7%, 95% CI 34.5-55.4%), and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Enterobacterales (36.6%, 95% CI 22.7-53.1%). CFDC-NS varied considerably with breakpoint definition, predominantly among CR bacteria. Additional sources of heterogeneity were single-centre investigations and geographical regions.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC-NS prevalence is low overall, but alarmingly high for specific CR phenotypes circulating in some institutions or regions. Continuous surveillance and updating of global CFDC-NS estimates are imperative while cefiderocol is increasingly introduced into clinical practice. The need to harmonize EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints was evident.

The prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the first-line therapy of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections, colistin is one of the therapeutic options in cases of allergy or resistance to TMP-SMX. However, understanding the global status of resistance to colistin amongst S. maltophilia isolates could be helpful for appropriate antibiotic prescription. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical S. maltophilia isolates worldwide. According to eligibility criteria, a total of 61 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence for colistin resistance was 42% (95% CI: 35-49%), ranging from 0.1 to 97%. Subgroups analysis indicated that, the pooled prevalence of colistin resistance was 44% (95% CI: 29-60%) in 15 studies during 2000-2010, and it was estimated to be 41% (95% CI: 33-50%) in 46 articles from 2011 to 2021. It was 46% (95% CI: 35-58%) in the studies that used broth microdilution method, and 39% (95% CI: 30-49%) in the studies with other used methods. The resistance rate in Asian countries was 45% (95% CI: 31-60%), in European countries was 45% (95% CI: 34-56%) and in the countries of North and South America was 33% (95% CI: 20-46%). Our review showed notable resistance to colistin in clinical S. maltophilia isolates. Given the estimated resistance rates, alternative antibiotics could be preferred to treat serious infections due to S. maltophilia.

An Overview of Cefiderocol's Therapeutic Potential and Underlying Resistance Mechanisms

Antimicrobial resistance continues to increase globally and treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) infections, mostly associated with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CR Acinetobacter baumannii, and CR- and third-generation-cephalosporins-resistant Enterobacterales remains a challenge for the clinician. The recent approval of cefiderocol has broaden the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with DTT infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that has shown excellent antibacterial activity, in part due to its innovative way of cell permeation. It is relatively stable compared to most commonly found carbapenamases. However, some resistant mechanisms to cefiderocol have already been identified and reduced susceptibility has developed during patient treatment, highlighting that the clinical use of cefiderocol must be rational. In this review, we summarize the current available treatments against the former resistant bacteria, and we revise and discuss the mechanism of action of cefiderocol, underlying the biological function of siderophores, the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol, and the mechanisms of resistance reported so far.

Performance evaluation of the UMIC® Cefiderocol to determine MIC in Gram-negative bacteria

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Cefiderocol susceptibility testing is complex because iron concentrations need to be taken into consideration. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of Bruker's UMIC® Cefiderocol and corresponding iron-depleted CAMHB to determine MIC by broth microdilution (BMD) for clinically relevant GNB.

METHODS

MICs of cefiderocol for 283 GN clinical isolates were determined by BMD using iron-depleted CAMHB. Frozen panels were used as a reference. The concentration range of cefiderocol was 0.03-32 mg/L. The isolates, with different degrees of susceptibility to cefiderocol, included Enterobacterales (n = 180), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 49), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 44) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 10).

RESULTS

The rates of categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA) and bias were calculated to evaluate the performance of the UMIC® Cefiderocol, as compared with the reference method. Overall, the UMIC® Cefiderocol showed 90.8% EA (95% CI: 86.9%-93.7%) with a bias of -14.5% and a CA of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.1%-93.1%). For Enterobacterales, the UMIC® Cefiderocol showed 91.7% EA (95% CI: 86.7%-94.9%) with a bias of -25.0% and a CA of 87.8% (95% CI: 82.2%-91.8%). For non-fermenters, the UMIC® Cefiderocol showed 89.3% EA (95% CI: 81.9%-93.9%) (not significantly different from 90.0%, Student t-test) with a bias of -3.9% and a CA of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.7%-97.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

UMIC® Cefiderocol is a valid method for the determination of cefiderocol MICs even if higher than expected discrepancies were observed with NDM-producing Enterobacterales, which presented in most cases MIC values close to the breakpoint.

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Clinical Gram-Negative Isolates Originating from Germany in 2016/17

Antimicrobial resistance poses a global threat to public health. Of great concern are Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales with resistance to carbapenems or third-generation cephalosporins. The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vitro activity of the novel siderophore cephaloporin cefiderocol (CID) and four comparator β-lactam-β-lactamase-inhibitor combinations and to give insights into the genetic background of CID-resistant isolates. In total, 301 clinical Enterobacterales and non-fermenting bacterial isolates were selected for this study, including randomly chosen isolates (set I, n = 195) and challenge isolates (set II, n = 106; enriched with ESBL and carbapenemase producers, as well as colistin-resistant isolates). Isolates displayed CID MIC_50/90 values of 0.12/0.5 mg/L (set I) and 0.5/1 mg/L (set II). Overall, the CID activity was superior to the comparators against A. baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and set II isolates of P. aeruginosa. There were eight CID-resistant isolates detected (MIC > 2 mg/L): A. baumannii (n = 1), E. cloacae complex (n = 5) and P. aeruginosa (n = 2). Sequencing analyses of these isolates detected the acquired β-lactamase (bla) genes bla_NDM-1,bla_SHV-12 and naturally occurring bla_OXA-396, bla_ACT-type and bla_CMH-3. In conclusion, CID revealed potent activity against clinically relevant organisms of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and non-fermenters.

Analysis of In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli by Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Method: A Single-Center Study in Odisha, India

Introduction

Cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel semi-synthetic siderophore cephalosporin has been developed to combat the menace of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Carbapenem-resistant Nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (CR-NFGNB).

Methods

We determined the in vitro activity of CFDC against a contemporary collection of 503 CR-GNB isolates by the reference broth microdilution method (BMD) using Iron depleted cation adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB). Performance of CFDC disk diffusion (DD) was evaluated against the reference BMD, as an alternative convenient testing method. Molecular characterization of carbapenemase in CR-GNB was performed by PCR targeting bla _NDM-1, bla _{OXA-48like alleles}, bla _KPC, bla _IMP, and, bla _VIM. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of CFDC in CR-GNB harbouring different carbapenemase enzymes was also analyzed.

Results

In our study, 81.7% (411/503) of CR-GNB isolates [81.3%, (278/342) CRE and 82.6% (133/161) CR-NFGNB] were susceptible to CFDC (p>0.05). Categorical agreement (CA) of DD ranged from 79.8% to 87.5%, Minor error (mE) ranged from 0 to 14%, Major error (ME) ranged from 0 to 3.5%, and Very Major error (VME) ranged from 0 to 12.5% with variations by species tested. Overall CFDC MIC50 and MIC90 values of CR-GNB isolates without any carbapenemase genes were higher as compared to those with the presence of carbapenemase genes (4 µg/mL and 128 µg/mL versus 2 µg/mL and 16 µg/mL respectively).

Discussion

CFDC is not yet available for clinical use in India. Hence, multicentric studies are the need of the hour in India for standardization of CFDC susceptibility using disks and CAMHB from different manufacturers as well as understanding mechanisms of high MIC values.

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a case for cefiderocol

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections constitute a serious clinical threat globally. Patients are often critically ill and/or immunocompromised. Antibiotic options are limited and are currently centered on beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combinations and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the mechanisms of P. aeruginosa resistance and their potential impact on the activity of current treatment options, along with evidence for the clinical efficacy of BL-BLI combinations in P. aeruginosa infections, some of which specifically target infections due to CR organisms. The preclinical and clinical evidence supporting cefiderocol as a treatment option for P. aeruginosa involving infections is also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cefiderocol is active against most known P. aeruginosa mechanisms mediating carbapenem resistance. It is stable against different serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, and, due to its iron channel-dependent uptake mechanism, is not impacted by porin channel loss. Furthermore, the periplasmic level of cefiderocol is not affected by upregulated efflux pumps. The potential for on-treatment resistance development currently appears to be low, although more clinical data are required. Information from surveillance programs, real-world compassionate use, and clinical studies demonstrate that cefiderocol is an important treatment option for CR P. aeruginosa infections.

In Vitro Activity of 22 Antibiotics against Achromobacter Isolates from People with Cystic Fibrosis. Are There New Therapeutic Options?

Bacteria belonging to the genus Achromobacter are increasingly isolated from respiratory samples of people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF). The management of this multidrug-resistant genus is challenging and characterised by a lack of international recommendations, therapeutic guidelines and data concerning antibiotic susceptibility, especially concerning the newer antibiotics. The objective of this study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of Achromobacter isolates from PWCF, including susceptibility to new antibiotics. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 22 antibiotics were determined for a panel of 23 Achromobacter isolates from 19 respiratory samples of PWCF. Two microdilution MIC plates were used: EUMDROXF^® plate (Sensititre) and Micronaut-S Pseudomonas MIC^® plate (Merlin) and completed by a third method if necessary (E-test^® or UMIC^®). Among usual antimicrobial agents, the most active was imipenem (70% susceptibility). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin and tigecycline (65%, 56% and 52% susceptibility, respectively) were still useful for the treatment of Achromobacter infections. Among new therapeutic options, β-lactams combined with a β-lactamase-inhibitor did not bring benefits compared to β-lactam alone. On the other hand, cefiderocol appeared as a promising therapeutic alternative for managing Achromobacter infections in PWCF. This study provides the first results on the susceptibility of clinical Achromobacter isolates concerning new antibiotics. More microbiological and clinical data are required to establish the optimal treatment of Achromobacter infections.

In-Vitro Efficacy of Cefiderocol in Carbapenem-Non-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacilli of Different Genotypes in Sub-Region of North Rhine Westphalia, Germany

In the last two decades, the worldwide dissemination of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) has continued. Therapy options for such infections caused by MDR-GNB remain scarce, and only few new antimicrobial agents have been granted market approval. Cefiderocol has been approved for the treatment of infections associated with aerobic GNB with limited therapy options. This study evaluated the in vitro efficacy of cefiderocol against carbapenem-non-susceptible clinical GNB isolates from Germany. A total of 115 non-duplicate carbapenem-nonsusceptible GNB isolates, 61 (53.05%) of which were Enterobacterales species and 54 (46.95%) were non-fermenters (Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), were investigated for their cefiderocol susceptibility. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for cefiderocol were determined by disk diffusion, according to EUCAST (European committee for antimicrobial susceptibility testing). Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints. In the absence of a species-specific breakpoint, pharmacokinetic/-dynamic breakpoints were used. The most common pathogen was A. baumannii (33.91%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.3%), P. aeruginosa (13.04%) and Escherichia coli (9.57%). Overall, 83.6% (51/61) of the Enterobacterales and 81.48% (44/54) of the non-fermenters were susceptible towards cefiderocol. In total, 20 species of Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB were resistant towards cefiderocol, irrespective of the isolation year (2014 to 2021). Moreover, the majority of the resistant isolates were among the OXA-23 producing A. baumannii (n = 7/26; 26.92%) from patients hospitalized during 2018 and 2019. Cefiderocol demonstrated high in vitro susceptibility rates against a wide range of carbapenem-non-susceptible GNB, including carbapenemase-producing isolates. Cefiderocol exhibited stability against hydrolysis by all carbapenemases, including metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), except that few OXA-producing isolates exhibited resistance towards cefiderocol.