Biological Variation of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Stable Lung Transplant Recipients

Nuances in the interpretation and utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA in lung transplantation following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - Case report

Respiratory complications following allogeneic HSCT can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. Lung transplantation (LT) is a potential treatment for select patients with late-onset non-infectious pulmonary complications post-HSCT. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring the health of allografts following LT. However, its utility in a multi-genome setting of LT after HSCT has not yet been clinically validated. Here we describe a case of a 75-year-old, male patient who underwent single-lung transplantation for BOS related to chronic GVHD and presented with persistently elevated dd-cfDNA levels. In a surveillance biopsy, the patient was diagnosed with mild acute cellular rejection at three months. The patient's lung function remained stable, and the reported dd-cfDNA levels decreased after the rejection episode but remained elevated above levels that would be considered quiescent for LT alone. In this unique setting, as 3 different genomes contributed to the dd-cfDNA% reported value, valuable insight was obtained by performing further analysis to separate the specific SNPs to identify the contribution of recipient, lung-donor, and HSCT-donor cfDNA. This study highlights the potential utility of dd-cfDNA in the multi-genome setting of lung transplant post-HSCT, nuances that need to be considered while interpreting the results, and its value in monitoring lung rejection.

The 2022 Banff Meeting Lung Report

The Lung Session of the 2022 16th Banff Foundation for Allograft Pathology Conference-held in Banff, Alberta-focused on non-rejection lung allograft pathology and novel technologies for the detection of allograft injury. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed the state-of-the-art of current histopathologic entities, serologic studies, and molecular practices, as well as novel applications of digital pathology with artificial intelligence, gene expression analysis, and quantitative image analysis of chest computerized tomography. Current states of need as well as prospective integration of the aforementioned tools and technologies for complete assessment of allograft injury and its impact on lung transplant outcomes were discussed. Key conclusions from the discussion were: (1) recognition of limitations in current standard of care assessment of lung allograft dysfunction; (2) agreement on the need for a consensus regarding the standardized approach to the collection and assessment of pathologic data, inclusive of all lesions associated with graft outcome (eg, non-rejection pathology); and (3) optimism regarding promising novel diagnostic modalities, especially minimally invasive, which should be integrated into large, prospective multicenter studies to further evaluate their utility in clinical practice for directing personalized therapies to improve graft outcomes.

Relative Change in Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA is Superior to Absolute Values for Diagnosis of Acute Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA%) is a biomarker of early acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD), with a value of ≥1.0% indicating injury. Whether dd-cfDNA% is a useful biomarker in patients >2 y posttransplant is unknown. Our group previously demonstrated that median dd-cfDNA% in lung recipients ≥2 y posttransplant without ALAD was 0.45%. In that cohort, biologic variability of dd-cfDNA% was estimated by a reference change value (RCV) of 73%, suggesting that change exceeding 73% may be pathologic. In this study, we aimed to determine whether dd-cfDNA% variability or absolute thresholds are optimal for detecting ALAD.

Methods

We prospectively measured plasma dd-cfDNA% every 3 to 4 mo in patients ≥2 y post-lung transplant. ALAD was defined as infection, acute cellular rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection, or change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s >10%, and was adjudicated retrospectively. We analyzed area under the curve for RCV and absolute dd-cfDNA% and reported performance of RCV ≥73% versus absolute value >1% for discriminating ALAD.

Results

Seventy-one patients had ≥2 baseline measurements of dd-cfDNA%; 30 developed ALAD. RCV of dd-cfDNA% at ALAD had a greater area under the receiver operator characteristic curve than absolute dd-cfDNA% values (0.87 versus 0.69, P = 0.018). Test characteristics of RCV >73% for ALAD diagnosis were sensitivity 87%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 74%, and negative predictive value 89%. In contrast, dd-cfDNA% ≥1% had sensitivity 50%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 63%, and negative predictive value 68%.

Conclusions

Relative change in dd-cfDNA% has improved test characteristics for diagnosing ALAD compared with absolute values.

Assessment of dd-cfDNA Levels in Clinically Stable Lung Allograft Recipients Beyond the Initial 2 y Posttransplant

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of acute allograft injury within the first 1 to 2 y after lung transplant, but its utility for diagnosing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has not yet been studied. Understanding baseline dd-cfDNA kinetics beyond the initial 2 y posttransplant is a necessary first step in determining the utility of dd-cfDNA as a CLAD biomarker. We seek to establish baseline dd-cfDNA% levels in clinically stable lung allograft recipients who are >2 y posttransplant.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, single-center, observational study to identify plasma dd-cfDNA levels in clinically stable lung allograft recipients >2 y posttransplant.

RESULTS

Fifty-one subjects were enrolled and ≥3 baseline dd-cfDNA measurements were acquired during a median of 252 d. The median baseline percent dd-cfDNA level in our cohort was 0.45% (interquartile range [IQR], 0.26-0.69). There were statistically significant differences in dd-cfDNA based on posttransplant duration (≤5 y posttransplant median 0.41% [IQR, 0.21-0.64] versus >5 y posttransplant median 0.50% [IQR, 0.33-0.76]; P < 0.02). However, the clinical significance of this small change in dd-cfDNA is uncertain because this magnitude of change is within the biologic test variation of 73%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to define levels of dd-cfDNA in clinically stable patients who are >2 y post-lung transplant. These findings lay the groundwork for the study of dd-cfDNA as a possible biomarker for CLAD.