Morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluation of liver allograft biopsies with contemporaneous serum DSA measurements

BACKGROUND

Acute antibody mediated rejection is increasingly identified in liver allografts as a unique form of alloimmune injury associated with donor specific antibodies (DSA). This manifests pathologically as microvascular injury and C4d uptake. Despite the liver allograft's relative resistance to alloimmune injury, liver allografts are not impervious to cellular and antibody-mediated rejection.

METHODS

In this blinded control study, we evaluated CD163 immunohistochemistry and applied the Banff 2016 criteria for diagnosis of acute AMR on a group of indication allograft liver biopsies from DSA positive patients and compared them to indication biopsies from DSA negative controls.

RESULTS

Most DSA positive patients were females (75%, p = .027), and underwent transplantation for HCV infection. Significant histopathological predictors of serum DSA positivity were Banff H-score (p = .01), moderate to severe cholestasis (p = .03), and CD163 score > 2 (p = .029). Other morphologic features that showed a trend with DSA positivity include Banff portal C4d-score (p = .06), bile ductular reaction (p = .07), and central perivenulitis (p = .07). The odds of DSA sMFI ≥5000 was 12.5 times higher in those with a C4d score >1 than those with a C4d score ≤ 1 (p = .04). Incidence of definite for aAMR in the DSA positive cohort was 25% (n = 5), and 0% in the DSA negative cohort. A group of 5 DSA positive cases were not classifiable by the current scheme.

CONCLUSION

Sinusoidal CD163, Banff H-score, and diffuse C4d are predictors of serum DSA, and facilitate recognition of histopathological features associated with serum DSA and tissue-antibody interaction.

Pharmacological Disruption of the Notch1 Transcriptional Complex Inhibits Tumor Growth by Selectively Targeting Cancer Stem Cells

In many human cancers, deregulation of the Notch pathway has been shown to play a role in the initiation and maintenance of the neoplastic phenotype. Aberrant Notch activity also plays a central role in the maintenance and survival of cancer stem cells (CSC), which underlie metastasis and resistance to therapy. For these reasons, inhibition of Notch signaling has become an exceedingly attractive target for cancer therapeutic development. However, attempts to develop Notch pathway-specific drugs have largely failed in the clinic, in part due to intestinal toxicity. Here, we report the discovery of NADI-351, the first specific small-molecule inhibitor of Notch1 transcriptional complexes. NADI-351 selectively disrupted Notch1 transcription complexes and reduced Notch1 recruitment to target genes. NADI-351 demonstrated robust antitumor activity without inducing intestinal toxicity in mouse models, and CSCs were ablated by NADI-351 treatment. Our study demonstrates that NADI-351 is an orally available and potent inhibitor of Notch1-mediated transcription that inhibits tumor growth with low toxicity, providing a potential therapeutic approach for improved cancer treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This study showcases the first Notch1-selective inhibitor that suppresses tumor growth with limited toxicity by selectively ablating cancer stem cells.

Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies in Living Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients

With less ischemia, improved donor selection and controlled procedures, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) might lead to less HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation or fewer adverse outcomes than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Using the multicenter A2ALL (Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study) biorepository, we compared the incidence and outcomes of preformed and de novo DSAs between LDLT and DDLT. In total, 129 LDLT and 66 DDLT recipients were identified as having serial samples. The prevalence of preformed and de novo DSAs was not different between DDLT and LDLT recipients (p = 0.93). There was no association between patient survival and the timing (preformed vs. de novo), class (I vs. II) and relative levels of DSA between the groups; however, preformed DSA was associated with higher graft failure only in DDLT recipients (p = 0.01). De novo DSA was associated with graft failure regardless of liver transplant type (p = 0.005) but with rejection only in DDLT (p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, DSA was an independent risk factor for graft failure regardless of liver transplant type (p = 0.017, preformed; p = 0.002, de novo). In conclusion, although similar in prevalence, DSA may have more impact in DDLT than LDLT recipients. Although our findings need further validation, future research should more robustly test the effect of donor type and strategies to mitigate the impact of DSA.

Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Allografts

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) can cause acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in all solid organ allografts. However, long-term outcome in patients with posttransplant DSA needs further study. We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected paired serum, tissue, and data on 45 matched DSA- positive [DSA+; mean florescence intensity (MFI) ≥10,000] and -negative (DSA-) recipients of a primary liver-only allograft from January 2000 to April 2009. Blinded histopathologic evaluation demonstrated that DSA+ versus DSA- patients were more likely to have subtle inflammation and unique patterns of fibrosis, despite normal or near-normal liver function tests. Stepwise multivariable modeling developed a score (putatively named the chronic AMR [cAMR] score) that included interface activity, lobular inflammation, portal tract collagenization, portal venopathy, sinusoidal fibrosis, and hepatitis C virus status. The score was developed (c = 0.811) and cross-validated (c = 0.704) to predict allograft failure. Two cutoffs were employed to optimize sensitivity and specificity (80% each); a value >27.5 predicted 50% 10-year allograft failure. We propose chronic AMR as a potential new entity defined by (1) a high cAMR score, (2) DSA, and (3) elimination of other potential causes of a similar injury pattern. In conclusion, cAMR score calculation identified liver allograft recipients with DSA at highest risk for allograft loss, although independent validation is needed.

Impact of IgG3 subclass and C1q-fixing donor-specific HLA alloantibodies on rejection and survival in liver transplantation

Recent literature confirms donor-specific HLA alloantibodies (DSA) impair 5-year survival in some but not all liver transplant recipients. In an effort to improve DSA testing's association with rejection and death, we retrospectively evaluated 1270 liver transplant recipients for the presence of IgG3 and C1q-fixing DSA. In patients with preformed DSA, 29 and 51% had IgG3 and C1q-fixing DSA, respectively. In patients with de novo DSA, 62% and 67% had IgG3 and C1q-fixing DSA, respectively. When different types of DSA positive patients were compared to DSA negative patients, multivariable analysis showed that IgG3 DSA positivity had the highest numerical hazard ratio for death (IgG3: HR = 2.4, p < 0.001; C1q: HR = 1.9, p < 0.001; standard DSA: HR = 1.6, p < 0.001). Similarly, multivariable analysis demonstrated de novo IgG3 DSA positivity compared to no DSA had the highest hazard ratio for death (IgG3: HR = 2.1, p = 0.004; C1q: HR = 1.9, p = 0.02; standard DSA: HR = 1.8, p = 0.007). Preformed C1q-fixing class II DSA showed the strongest correlation with early rejection. In conclusion, preformed and de novo IgG3 subclass DSA positive patients had the highest absolute HR for death in side-by-side comparison with C1q and standard DSA positive versus DSA negative patients; however, IgG3 negative DSA positive patients still had inferior outcomes compared to DSA negative patients.

Acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an inter-institutional study of significant histopathological features

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurs in a small minority of sensitized liver transplant recipients. Although histopathological characteristics have been described, specific features that could be used (1) to make a generalizable scoring system and (2) to trigger a more in-depth analysis are needed to screen for this rare but important finding. Toward this goal, we created training and validation cohorts of putative acute AMR and control cases from 3 high-volume liver transplant programs; these cases were evaluated blindly by 4 independent transplant pathologists. Evaluations of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections were performed alone without knowledge of either serum donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibody (DSA) results or complement component 4d (C4d) stains. Routine histopathological features that strongly correlated with severe acute AMR included portal eosinophilia, portal vein endothelial cell hypertrophy, eosinophilic central venulitis, central venulitis severity, and cholestasis. Acute AMR inversely correlated with lymphocytic venulitis and lymphocytic portal inflammation. These and other characteristics were incorporated into models created from the training cohort alone. The final acute antibody-mediated rejection score (aAMR score)--the sum of portal vein endothelial cell hypertrophy, portal eosinophilia, and eosinophilic venulitis divided by the sum of lymphocytic portal inflammation and lymphocytic venulitis--exhibited a strong correlation with severe acute AMR in the training cohort [odds ratio (OR) = 2.86, P < 0.001] and the validation cohort (OR = 2.49, P < 0.001). SPSS tree classification was used to select 2 cutoffs: one that optimized specificity at a score > 1.75 (sensitivity = 34%, specificity = 86%) and another that optimized sensitivity at a score > 1.0 (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 71%). In conclusion, the routine histopathological features of the aAMR score can be used to screen patients for acute AMR via routine H&E staining of indication liver transplant biopsy samples; however, a definitive diagnosis requires substantiation by DSA testing, diffuse C4d staining, and the exclusion of other insults.

Donor-specific alloantibodies are associated with fibrosis progression after liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-infected patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) fibrosis progression after liver transplantation (LT) is accelerated in comparison with fibrosis progression before transplantation. The vast majority of the risk factors for fibrosis progression after LT are not modifiable. With the goal of identifying modifiable risk factors for fibrosis progression, we evaluated the impact of preformed and de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies (DSAs) on fibrosis progression after LT in HCV-viremic patients. After blinding, we analyzed all 507 HCV-viremic patients who underwent primary LT from January 2000 to May 2009 and had pretransplant and posttransplant samples available for analysis (86% of the total) for preformed and de novo class I and class II DSAs with a mean fluorescence intensity ≥ 5000 with single-antigen bead technology. Fibrosis was assessed on the basis of indication and protocol liver biopsies; compliance with protocol liver biopsies at 1, 2, and 5 years was ≥80%. Preformed class I DSAs [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44, P = 0.04] and class II DSAs (HR = 1.86, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of progression to stage 2-4 fibrosis, and de novo DSAs (HR = 1.41, P = 0.07) had borderline significance. In addition, preformed class I DSAs (HR = 1.63, P = 0.03) and class II DSAs (HR = 1.72, P = 0.03) were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of death. In conclusion, after we controlled for donor and recipient characteristics in multivariate modeling, DSAs were independently associated with fibrosis progression and death after LT in HCV-viremic patients.

Antibody-mediated rejection as a contributor to previously unexplained early liver allograft loss

We analyzed 60 patients with idiopathic early allograft loss (defined as death or retransplantation at <90 days) to determine the relative contribution of preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies (DSAs) to this endpoint, and we defined strict criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver allografts. The inclusion criteria encompassed the availability of a pretransplant serum sample and both postreperfusion and follow-up tissue specimens for a blinded, retrospective re-review of histology and complement component 4d (C4d) staining. AMR was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of all 4 of the following strict criteria: (1) DSAs in serum, (2) histopathological evidence of diffuse microvascular injury/microvasculitis consistent with antibody-mediated injury, (3) diffuse C4d staining in the portal microvasculature with or without staining in the sinusoids or central veins in at least 1 sample, and (4) the exclusion of other causes of a similar type of injury. Patients thought to be experiencing definite AMR on the basis of routine histopathology alone showed the highest levels of DSA sensitization. Forty percent of patients with pretransplant DSAs with a pattern of bead saturation after serial dilutions developed AMR. Another multiparous female developed what appeared to be a strong recall response, which resulted in combined AMR and acute cellular rejection (ACR) causing graft failure. A contribution of DSAs to allograft failure could not be excluded for 3 additional patients who received marginal grafts. In conclusion, liver allograft recipients with preformed DSAs with a high mean fluorescence intensity despite dilution seem to be at risk for clinically significant allograft injury and possibly for loss from AMR, often in combination with ACR.

The Role of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Intestinal Transplantation: Experience at the University of California Los Angeles and Literature Review

Intestinal transplantation is a viable treatment strategy for patients with irreversible intestinal failure for whom parenteral nutrition is no longer an option. Although improvements have been made in short-term post-transplant survival outcomes, long-term allograft loss, mainly to acute or chronic rejection, remains a major obstacle to successful transplantation. In all types of solid organ transplants, there is increasing evidence that antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigens, and in particular donor-specific antibodies (DSA), contribute to acute and chronic rejection as well as allograft loss. In this single-center review of intestinal transplant recipients, we report that the presence of pretransplant circulating DSA and the de novo induction of DSA posttransplant are both associated with increased risks of allograft loss. Although the cumulative incidence of acute rejection was not significantly affected by the presence of DSA, the power of this single-center study may be limited. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to further elucidate the role of DSA in intestinal transplant recipients. In the published literature, there is a clear link between the presence of pre-formed DSA and early injury to the mucosal vasculature of the allograft. Two groups have reported an association between pretransplant DSA and the frequency of acute rejection episodes and subsequent graft loss. Similarly, studies investigating the effects of de novo DSA have demonstrated a relationship between the presence of post-transplant circulating antibodies and the occurrence of acute rejection and the risk of allograft failure. The use of a liver-containing graft appears to facilitate the clearance of pre-formed antibodies and prevents the de novo induction of post-transplant antibodies. The most recent report stated that the de novo induction of DSA is concurrently accompanied by signs or rejection, such that the detection of circulating antibodies may signify impending graft injury, and supports the potential utility of DSA as a non-invasive biomarker for rejection in intestinal transplantation.

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies decrease patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients

The role of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in liver transplantation remains unknown as most of the previous studies have only focused on preformed HLA antibodies. To understand the significance of de novo DSA, we designed a retrospective cohort study of 749 adult liver transplant recipients with pre- and posttransplant serum samples that were analyzed for DSA. We found that 8.1% of patients developed de novo DSA 1 year after transplant; almost all de novo DSAs were against HLA class II antigens, and the majority were against DQ antigens. In multivariable modeling, the use of cyclosporine (as opposed to tacrolimus) and low calcineurin inhibitor levels increased the risk of de novo DSA formation, while a calculated MELD score >15 at transplant and recipient age >60 years old reduced the risk. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated that patients with de novo DSA at 1-year had significantly lower patient and graft survival. In conclusion, we demonstrate that de novo DSA development after liver transplantation is an independent risk factor for patient death and graft loss.

Preformed class II donor-specific antibodies are associated with an increased risk of early rejection after liver transplantation

Preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) are considered a contraindication to the transplantation of most solid organs other than the liver. Conflicting data currently exist on the importance of preformed DSAs in rejection and patient survival after liver transplantation (LT). To evaluate preformed DSAs in LT, we retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected samples from all adult recipients of primary LT without another organ from January 1, 2000 to May 31, 2009 with a pre-LT sample available (95.8% of the patients). Fourteen percent of the patients had preformed class I and/or II DSAs with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥ 5000. Preformed class I DSAs with an MFI ≥ 5000 remained persistent in only 5% of patients and were not associated with rejection. Preformed class II DSAs with an MFI of 5000 to 10,000 remained persistent in 23% of patients, and this rate increased to 33% for patients whose MFI was ≥10,000 (P < 0.001). Preformed class II DSAs in multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were associated with an increased risk of early rejection [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58; p = 0.004]. In addition, multivariate modeling showed that in comparison with no DSAs (MFI < 1000), preformed class I and/or II DSAs with an MFI ≥ 5000 were independently correlated with the risk of death (HR = 1.51; p = 0.02).

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies decrease patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients

The role of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in liver transplantation remains unknown as most of the previous studies have only focused on preformed HLA antibodies. To understand the significance of de novo DSA, we designed a retrospective cohort study of 749 adult liver transplant recipients with pre- and posttransplant serum samples that were analyzed for DSA. We found that 8.1% of patients developed de novo DSA 1 year after transplant; almost all de novo DSAs were against HLA class II antigens, and the majority were against DQ antigens. In multivariable modeling, the use of cyclosporine (as opposed to tacrolimus) and low calcineurin inhibitor levels increased the risk of de novo DSA formation, while a calculated MELD score >15 at transplant and recipient age >60 years old reduced the risk. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated that patients with de novo DSA at 1-year had significantly lower patient and graft survival. In conclusion, we demonstrate that de novo DSA development after liver transplantation is an independent risk factor for patient death and graft loss.

2013 annual literature review of donor-specific HLA antibodies after organ transplantation

1. There is still a need to better differentiate clinically relevant from irrelevant DSA in all organs. Modified bead assay testing for different immunoglobulin (Ig) G characteristics (Clq-fixing DSA, C4d-fixing DSA, IgG subclasses, or IgM) often improve the predictive value for rejection and failure compared to standard IgG DSA. A new approach looking for intragraft DSA instead of serum DSA represents a very interesting attempt. The relevance of DSA may not solely be determined by antibody characteristics, but may be in the capacity of an antibody to bind specific antigens on the allograft. If not all circulating DSAs are able to bind the allograft, intrinsic protective mechanisms will have to be investigated. 2. Modern tests that include multi-gene microarrays are now more commonly used and generate an enormous amount of information that can help support conventional diagnostic methods. In kidney transplantation, the discovery of a set of genes and the subsequent development of an ABMR score strongly associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not only being used to better define this type of rejection, but also to complement the definition in cases with incomplete phenotypes. 3. Effective therapies to treat AMR and to reduce DSA are still lacking. Multiple case reports and small case series had been published and many more are currently being carried out, but poor study design, heterogeneous population, and therapeutic interventions make these published experiences difficult to be applied clinically.

Donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies of the immunoglobulin G3 subclass are associated with chronic rejection and graft loss after liver transplantation

In a previous study, we found that 92% of patients with chronic rejection had donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs), but surprisingly, 61% of comparator patients without rejection also had DSAs. We hypothesized that immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses were differentially distributed between the 2 groups. A modified single-antigen bead assay was used to detect the presence of individual IgG subclasses against human leukocyte antigen in 39 chronic rejection patients and 66 comparator patients. DSAs of the IgG1 subclass were most common and were found in 45% of all patients; they were followed by IgG3 DSAs (21%), IgG4 DSAs (14%), and IgG2 DSAs (13%). The percentage of patients with multiple IgG subclasses was significantly higher in the chronic rejection group versus the comparator group (50% versus 14%, P < 0.001). Patients with normal graft function in the presence of DSAs mostly had isolated IgG1, whereas patients with chronic rejection had a combination of IgG subclasses. Patients who developed DSAs of the IgG3 subclass showed an increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio = 3.35, 95% confidence interval = 1.39-8.05) in comparison with patients with DSAs of other IgG subclasses or without DSAs. Although further study is needed, the determination of the IgG subclass in DSA-positive patients may help us to identify patients with a higher risk of chronic rejection and graft loss.

2012 annual literature review of donor-specific HLA antibodies after organ transplantation

From the articles reviewed in the present chapter, we observed: 1. The frequency of de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) detection in different organs is very similar: ranging between 15% and 23% in kidney, 23% in pancreas, and 18% in intestinal transplant patients. Apparently, all organs can elicit humoral responses after transplantation at comparable rates. 2. Although rates of de novo DSA formation after kidney transplantation are very similar across different centers--between 15% and 23%--, the mean time to the first detection of de novo DSA is markedly variable between centers (from 8 months to 4 years). Some differences found in the studies that may account for this could be the age of patients (studies including pediatric patients tend to show longer time to DSA detection compared to studies only including adults patients), patients' race, and maintenance immunosuppression regimens. 3. In most organs, alloantibodies against class II HLA--and especially against HLA-DQ antigens--are the most common DSA detected. This finding supports previous studies, but the explanation remains unclear. Poor HLA-DQ matching, paucity of class II HLA antigen expression on cell surface, and technical factors related to the detection of these antibodies (mean fluorescence intensity cutoff, multiple beads with the same antigen, denatured protein on single antigen beads) are some of the potential explanations that need further investigation. 4. Recent focus on histological changes during rejection in the presence of DSA that are independent of C4d deposition may change how antibody-mediated rejection is diagnosed in the near future. 5. More studies are looking into the importance of DSA in non-kidney transplants and now evidence shows that DSA may not only affect survival and rejection rates, but may also be associated with organ-specific lesions like fibrosis and biliary complications in livers or capillaritis in lungs.

High mean fluorescence intensity donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies associated with chronic rejection Postliver transplant

In contrast to kidney transplantation where donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) negatively impact graft survival, correlation of DSA with clinical outcomes in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has not been clearly established. We hypothesized that DSA are present in patients who develop chronic rejection after OLT. Prospectively collected serial serum samples on 39 primary OLT patients with biopsy-proven chronic rejection and 39 comparator patients were blinded and analyzed for DSA using LABScreen(®) single antigen beads test, where a 1000 mean fluorescence value was considered positive. In study patients, the median graft survival was 15 months, 74% received ≥ one retransplant, 20% remain alive and 87% had ≥ one episode of acute rejection. This is in contrast to comparator patients where 69% remain alive, and no patient needed retransplant or experienced rejection. Thirty-six chronic rejection patients (92%) and 24 (61%) comparator patients had DSA (p = 0.003). Chronic rejection versus comparator patients had higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA. Although a further study with larger numbers of patients is needed to identify clinically significant thresholds, there is an association of high-MFI DSA with chronic rejection after OLT.

Protective immunity remains intact after antibody removal by means of proteasome inhibition

BACKGROUND

Proteasome inhibition abrogates donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) in patients posttransplant. However, its effects on protective humoral immunity to vaccine antigens remain unknown. Herein, we report on bortezomib's safety regarding protective immunity in patients who have experienced HLA antibody reduction/removal.

METHODS

Thirteen living donor renal transplant patients were treated with bortezomib one to two cycles (1.3 mg/m² × 4 doses) and plasmapheresis in 2008 to remove HLA antibodies posttransplant. Serial measurements of HLA antibody were conducted weekly before, during, and after treatment by means of single antigen bead on Luminex (One Lambda Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Measles and tetanus toxoid IgGs were measured quantitatively by using ELISA (American Research Products Inc., Belmont, MA).

RESULTS

All patients treated with bortezomib/plasmapheresis resulted in a primary DSA reduction of more than 50%. In 10 of 13 patients, complete DSA removal (to below 1000 mean fluorescent intensity) occurred. At 1 year posttreatment, antibody intensity remains significantly depressed in the group as a whole. Despite the significant effect on antibody production, tetanus toxoid and measles IgG levels remained unchanged and above the level of protection at 1 year posttreatment.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that proteasome inhibitors plus plasmapheresis results in prolonged reduction of HLA antibodies while leaving protective immunity intact.

Anti-HLA-E mAb 3D12 mimics MEM-E/02 in binding to HLA-B and HLA-C alleles: Web-tools validate the immunogenic epitopes of HLA-E recognized by the antibodies

HLA-E shares several peptide sequences with HLA-class Ia molecules. Therefore, anti-HLA-E antibodies that recognize the shared sequences may bind to HLA-class Ia alleles. This hypothesis was validated with a murine anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibody (mAb) MEM-E/02, which reacted with microbeads coated with several HLA-B and HLA-C antigens. In this report, the hypothesis was reexamined with another mAb 3D12, considered to be specific for HLA-E. The antibody binding is evaluated by measuring mean fluorescence index [MFI] with Luminex Multiplex Flow-Cytometric technology. The peptide-inhibition experiments are carried out with synthetic shared peptides, most prevalent to HLA-E and HLA-Ia alleles. The results showed that mAb 3D12 simulated MEM-E/02 in recognizing several HLA-B and HLA-C antigens. Both 3D12 and MEM-E/02 did not bind to HLA-A, HLA-F and HLA-G molecules. As observed with MEM-E/02, binding of 3D12 to HLA-E is inhibited by the peptides sequences (115)QFAYDGKDY(123) and (137)DTAAQI(142). Decrease in binding of mAb 3D12 to HLA class Ia, after heat treatment of antigen coated microbeads, supports the contention that the epitope may be located at the outside of the "thermodynamically stable" α-helix conformations of HLA-E. Several sequence and structure-based web-tools were employed to validate the discontinuous epitopes recognized by the mAbs. The scores obtained by these web-tools distinguished the shared peptide sequences that inhibited the mAb binding to HLA-E. Furthermore, ElliPro web tool points out that both mAbs recognize the conformational discontinuous epitopes (the shared inhibitory peptide sequences) in the secondary structure of the HLA-E molecule. The study favors the contention that the domain of the shared inhibitory peptide sequences may be the most immunogenic site of HLA-E molecule. It also postulates and clarifies that amino acid substitution on or near the binding domains may account for the lack of cross reactivity of 3D12 and MEM-E/02 with HLA-A, HLA-F and HLA-G molecules.

Annual literature review of donor-specific HLA antibodies after organ transplantation

The literature review of post-transplant DSA published in 2011 shows: Observations after kidney and lung transplant in non-sensitized transplant recipients show that monitoring post-transplant HLA antibodies offers limited benefit in predicting acute rejection episodes. It remains to be seen if a different monitoring schedule and/ or studying other organs may show otherwise. Nevertheless, others have shown that monitoring post-transplant antibodies does identify patients at higher risk for chronic rejection. Studies in kidney, heart, and liver patients transplanted in the presence of preformed DSA show that detecting these antibodies early after transplant identifies a group of patients with greater risk for allograft dysfunction. New and larger studies using bortezomib and eculizumab to treat acute antibody-mediated rejection confirm earlier observations that these two therapies are effective in treating and preventing rejections. In general, identification of HLAantibodies and DSA after transplant is associated with higher rates of rejection and poor allograft survival in all organs examined. IgM antibodies appear to play an important role after lung transplants.

Antibodies to HLA-E in nonalloimmunized males: pattern of HLA-Ia reactivity of anti-HLA-E-positive sera

Natural anti-HLA Abs found in sera of healthy nonalloimmunized males recognize HLA-Ia alleles parallel to those recognized by anti-HLA-E mAbs (MEM-E/02/06/07). Therefore, some of the HLA-Ia Abs seen in healthy males could be due to anti-HLA-E Abs cross-reacting with HLA-Ia. If anti-HLA-E Abs occur in healthy nonalloimmunized males, it can be assessed whether they evoke HLA-Ia reactivity as do mouse HLA-E mAbs. IgG and IgM Abs to HLA-E and HLA-Ia alleles are identified in sera of healthy males using microbeads coated with recombinant denatured HLA-E or a panel of rHLA-Ia alleles. The pattern of allelic recognition is comparable to that of anti-HLA-E mAbs. Sixty-six percent of the sera with HLA-E IgG have a high level of HLA-Ia IgG, whereas 70% of those with no anti-HLA-E Abs have no HLA-Ia Abs. HLA-E IgM/IgG ratios of sera are divided into four groups: IgM(Low)/IgG(Low), IgM(High)/IgG(Low), IgM(High)/IgG(High), and IgM(Low)/IgG(High). These groups correspond to anti-HLA-Ia IgM/IgG ratio groups. When HLA-E IgM and IgG are absent or present in males, the IgM or IgG of HLA-Ia are similarly absent or present. The mean fluorescent intensity of HLA-Ia Abs correlates with that of anti-HLA-E Abs. Most importantly, HLA-E and HLA-Ia reactivities of the sera are inhibited by the shared, but cryptic, peptide sequences (117)AYDGKDY(123) and (137)DTAAQIS(143). Therefore, Abs to the H chain of HLA-E may be responsible for some of the HLA-Ia allele reactivity of the natural HLA-Ia Ab in human sera. Absence of any anti-HLA-Ia Abs in 112 nonvegans and the presence of the same in vegans suggest that dietary meat proteins might not have induced the natural allo-HLA Abs.

HLA-E monoclonal antibodies recognize shared peptide sequences on classical HLA class Ia: relevance to human natural HLA antibodies

The non-classical HLA-Ib molecule, HLA-E share several peptide sequence similarities with the heavy chains of classical HLA class Ia (-B and -C) molecules. Therefore, the antibodies to HLA-E, that recognize shared sequences, may bind to HLA-Ia alleles. This hypothesis is tested by examining the affinity of HLA-E monoclonal antibodies (HLA-E-MAbs) to HLA-Ia molecules and by inhibiting the antibody binding to both HLA-E and HLA-Ia with the shared peptide sequence(s). Single recombinant HLA molecule-coated beads are used for antibody binding. The antibody binding is evaluated by measuring mean fluorescence index [MFI] with Luminex multiplex flow-cytometric technology. The peptide-inhibition experiments are carried out with synthetic shared peptides, most prevalent to HLA-E and HLA-Ia alleles. The number of HLA-Ia alleles recognized by the HLA-E-MAbs varies with the density of the antigen (quantity of antigen-coated beads) and dilution of MAb. Binding of HLA-E-MAbs to beta2 microglobulin (beta(2)m)-free HLA-Ia antigens confirms the location of the epitopes on the heavy chain (HC) of the antigens. Strikingly, the nature of alleles of HLA-Ia recognized by different HLA-E-MAbs is identical. The binding of HLA-E-MAbs to the HLA-Ia is inhibited dosimetrically by the adjacent peptides, (115)QFAYDGKDY(123) and (137)DTAAQI(142), but not by (126)LNEDLRSWTA(135), another closer shared peptide sequence. The inhibitory peptide sequences in HLA-E are at the alpha2-helix terminal facing beta(2)m. The HLA-Ia alleles recognized by HLA-E-MAb (e.g., MEM-E/02) are similar to those recognized by the natural anti-HLA antibodies found in the sera of healthy non-alloimmunized males. This study postulates that some, if not all, of the natural HLA-Ia antibodies seen in healthy males could be anti-HLA-E antibodies cross-reacting with HLA-Ia alleles.

Impact of donor-specific HLA antibodies in transplantation, a review of the literature published in the last three years

This chapter summarizes some of the recent findings published on the role in organ transplantation of HLA antibodies, and--more important--donor-specific HLA antibodies. The negative impact of both, preformed and de novo DSA is now better recognized in recipients of kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, islet cells and bone marrow transplants. An appropriate design of a schedule to monitor HLA antibodies may identify patients at higher risk for immunological events earlier and allow interventions to avoid later graft loss. The value of strategies like preemptive treatment of antibodies and the use of new agents like bortezomib and eculizumab are of interest and need further investigation.

A "new" road to tolerance: clonal deletion and drugs added when needed (DAWN)

We propose clonal deletion--immunization followed by deletion--as a "new" way to achieve tolerance. Immunization of a donor results in specific stimulation of a clone of cells, which can then be killed by various agents, leaving the patient otherwise immunologically normal. The theory of clonal deletion is supported by experimental evidence as well as earlier experiences with kidney transplants and donor-specific transfusions. To date, 22 patients who underwent clonal deletion have been surviving for 1.5 to 2.5 years with only low-dose prednisone. In addition, those patients who required conventional immunosuppressive drugs were treated with the new Drugs Added When Needed (DAWN) protocol. With DAWN as a tactic ready for intervention, and by using antibodies to monitor the completeness of clonal deletion, we assure that patients are subjected to the minimal amount of drugs on a personalized basis. We suggest that risks involved in testing this new procedure are small and the benefits immeasurable.

Removal of physiologic corticosteroid doses results in HLA antibody appearance and allograft dysfunction in patients transplanted under a clonal deletion protocol

Many transplant protocols now use high-intensity induction immunosuppression immediately post-transplant, followed by weaning from immunosuppressives. This chapter reports on the risks of post-transplant immunosuppression reduction/removal revealed by a close monitoring of HLA antibodies in 14 patients who recently received living-donor kidney grafts under clonal deletion at the IKDRC-ITS in Ahmedabad, India. While all 14 patients still have good function at a median follow-up of 13.5 months (7.3-20.1), only two had no dysfunction or antibody appearance. Antibodies appeared in 10 of the other 12, and serum creatinine rose in six of the 12. In light of the high rate of immune activation following immunosuppression reduction/withdrawal, it is clear that close monitoring is required to ensure safety in these patients. The tests that are most effective as early warning of immune activation in these kidney recipients were elevation of serum creatinine and antibodies monitoring, the latter being, perhaps, the more important for reasons discussed in this chapter.

Clonal deletion using total lymphoid irradiation with no maintenance immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients

A total of 69 individuals received a kidney from a living donor after a TLI-based clonal deletion protocol with no post-transplant maintenance immunosuppression planned. If needed, immunosuppression was started on a patient-specific basis, adding one drug at a time, a strategy we AWN". call "Drugs Added When Needed," or "DAWN. Following this strategy, at last follow-up 40 of the 69 patients (58%) had to be rescued by conventional immunosuppression, 23 (33%) had to be started on daily prednisone and six (9%) remained with no maintenance immunosuppression. The overall rate of de novo donor-specific antibody produced was 36% (in 25 of the 69 patients), and mean time to detection was about four months. The incidence of acute rejection episodes that displayed humoral components was 27% (19 cases), of which 14 were pure antibody-mediated rejection, five combined antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejection, and six were episodes (9%) of pure T-cell-mediated rejection. Finally, this study shows that although complete clonal deletion was not achieved, an important proportion of patients--42%, or 29 of the original 69--could be maintained with prednisone alone or even with no immunosuppression for a total mean follow-up of 13.3 months. Moreover, 16 patients with recent follow-up are surviving with no maintenance immunosuppression or just on prednisone. The mean serum creatinine at last follow-up for these 16 patients is 1.33 +/- 0.2 mg/dL with a mean follow-up of 19.3 months. Clonal deletion can be used to transplant patients without maintenance immunosuppression, adding drugs only as needed.

Elimination of post-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies with bortezomib

We show the ability of bortezomib to remove donor-specific HLA antibody from kidney allograft patients, the drug acting as a proteasome inhibitor, providing targeted therapy against antibody-producing plasma cells. Ten out of thirteen patients (77%) experienced primary DSA reversal, and in the remaining three patients the MFI of their primary DSA was dramatically reduced. Bortezomib is a viable therapy to treat donor-specific HLA antibody in allograft recipients. The potential for long-term benefits--and complications--are still unknown. Prospective trials are being conducted at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and at IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.

Donor-specific HLA antibody response in clonal deletion

1. A total of 61 patients were treated with a clonal deletion protocol and transplanted without planned post-transplant immunosuppression. 2. Twenty-nine (48%) patients did not develop any donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after the transplant, with a median follow-up of 158 days and a mean sCr of 2.1 mg/dL at the last follow-up. 3. Only 23% of the patients who received a DST of 60 mL produced DSA after the transplant, while 68% of the patients who received a bigger DST dose did. 4. Small doses of donor-specific transfusions (60 mL) elicited smaller specific responses, allowing efficient deletion of the reacting clones, creating conditions in which donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies were not produced. 5. A better deleting agent is needed to achieve higher rates of success using the clonal deletion protocol.

Detection of soluble HLA-G and its correlation with kidney transplant outcome

We showed a protective effect of soluble HLA-G in sera of kidney transplant patients, confirming the statement that sHLA-G plays a role in the regulation of the immune system, leading to a better acceptance of the graft. Our results also suggest that determining sHLA-G concentration in serum could help to correlate in a better way the expression of this molecule and its protective effect since it has been demonstrated a concentration-dependent effect. The relationship between the production of HLA antibodies and the expression of sHLA-G is not clear, however, since there is not much information regarding this. Further studies are required in order to have more sources for better conclusions and to keep describing precisely the properties of this molecule.