1
|
Jiang Q, Sherlock DN, Elolimy AA, Yoon I, Loor JJ. Feeding a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product during a gut barrier challenge in lactating Holstein cows impacts the ruminal microbiota and metabolome. J Dairy Sci 2024; 107:4476-4494. [PMID: 38369118 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-24147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Through its influence on the gut microbiota, the feeding of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products (SCFP) has been a successful strategy to enhance the health of dairy cows during periods of physiological stresses. Although production and metabolic outcomes from feeding SCFP are well-known, its combined impacts on the ruminal microbiota and metabolome during gut barrier challenges remain unclear. To address this gap in knowledge, multiparous Holstein cows (97.1 ± 7.6 DIM [SD]; n = 8/group) fed a control diet (CON) or CON plus 19 g/d SCFP for 9 wk were subjected to a feed restriction (FR) challenge for 5 d, during which they were fed 40% of their ad libitum intake from the 7 d before FR. The DNA extracted from ruminal fluid was subjected to PacBio full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, real-time PCR of 12 major ruminal bacteria, and metabolomics analysis of up to 189 metabolites via GC/MS. High-quality amplicon sequence analyses were performed with the TADA (Targeted Amplicon Diversity Analysis), MicrobiomeAnalyst, PICRUSt2, and STAMP software packages, and metabolomics data were analyzed via MetaboAnalyst 5.0. Ruminal fluid metabolites from the SCFP group exhibited a greater α-diversity Chao 1 (P = 0.03) and Shannon indices (P = 0.05), and the partial least squares discriminant analysis clearly discriminated metabolite profiles between dietary groups. The abundance of CPla_4_termite_group, Candidatus Saccharimonas, Oribacterium, and Pirellula genus in cows fed SCFP was greater. In the SCFP group, concentrations of ethanolamine, 2-amino-4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine, glyoxylic acid, serine, threonine, cytosine, stearic acid, and pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid were greater in ruminal fluid. Both Fretibacterium and Succinivibrio abundances were positively correlated with metabolites across various biological processes: gamma-aminobutyric acid, galactose, butane-2,3-diol, fructose, 5-amino pentanoic acid, β-aminoisobutyric acid, ornithine, malonic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyric acid, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, cadaverine, glycolic acid, β-alanine, 2-hydroxybutyric acid, methyl alanine, and alanine. In the SCFP group, compared with CON, the mean proportion of 14 predicted pathways based on metabolomics data was greater, whereas 10 predicted pathways were lower. Integrating metabolites and upregulated predicted enzymes (NADP+-dependent glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, serine: glyoxylate aminotransferase, and d-glycerate 3-kinase) indicated that the pentose phosphate pathway and photorespiration pathway were most upregulated by SCFP. Overall, SCFP during FR led to alterations in ruminal microbiota composition and key metabolic pathways. Among those, we identified a shift from the tricarboxylic acid cycle to the glyoxylate cycle, and nitrogenous base production was enhanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianming Jiang
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
| | | | - Ahmed A Elolimy
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801; Livestock Production and Management, Department of Integrated Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 1551, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Juan J Loor
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Correlation of Ruminal Fermentation Parameters and Rumen Bacterial Community by Comparing Those of the Goat, Sheep, and Cow In Vitro. FERMENTATION 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8090427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to establish the correlation between ruminal fermentation parameters and the bacterial community by comparing those of the goat, sheep, and cow, thus illustrating the main bacteria causing the difference in rumen fermentation among goats, sheep, and cows and providing a new idea for improving the feed digestibility of ruminants. Rumen fluid from goats (Taihang White cashmere goat, n = 6), sheep (Hu sheep, n = 6), and cows (Holstein cow, n = 6) was collected using oral intubation and immediately brought back to the laboratory for a fermentation test with the same total mixed ration (TMR) feed in vitro. The rumen bacterial composition was measured by high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes in the MiSeq platform, the gas production (GP) was recorded after 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h of fermentation, and the feed nutrient digestibility and the rumen fluid parameters were determined after 48 h of fermentation. The results showed that the 48 h GP of the sheep group was higher than that of the cow group (p < 0.05), and the theoretical maximum GP was higher than that of the goat and cow groups (p < 0.05). The organic matter digestibility (OMD), dry matter digestibility (DMD), crude protein digestibility (CPD), and gross energy digestibility (GED) of the sheep group were higher than those of the goat and cow groups (p < 0.05). The ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), microbial protein (MCP), and total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) concentrations of the sheep group were higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.05), and the pH of the sheep group was lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). The 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that bacterial composition also differed in the rumens of the sheep, goat, and cow groups (ANOSIM, p < 0.05). We then used a random forest machine learning algorithm to establish models to predict the fermentation parameters by rumen bacterial composition, and the results showed that rumen bacterial composition could explain most of the ruminal fermentation parameter variation (66.56%, 56.13%, 65.75%, 80.85%, 61.30%, 4.59%, 1.41%, −3.13%, 34.76%, −25.62%, 2.73%, 60.74%, 76.23%, 47.48%, −13.2%, 80.16%, 4.15%, 69.03%, 32.29%, and 89.96% for 48 h GP, a (GP of quickly degraded part), b (GP of slowly degraded part), c (GP rate), a + b (theoretical maximum GP), DMD, OMD, GED, CPD, NDFD, ANDF, pH, NH3-N, MCP, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, TVFA, and A:P (acetic acid–propionic acid ratio), respectively). A correlation analysis revealed that Lactobacillus, Prevotellaceae_UCG-003, Selenomonas, Peptostreptococcus, and Olsenella significantly correlated with most in vitro fermentation parameters (p < 0.05). A comprehensive analysis showed that rumen fermentation parameters and bacterial composition differed in goats, sheep, and cows. The ruminal fermentation parameters of GP, a, b, c, a + b, pH, NH3-N, propionic acid, valeric acid, and A:P could be accurately predicted by rumen bacteria (explanation > 55% of variation), and the Lactobacillus, Prevotellaceae_UCG-003, Olsenella, Selenomonas, and Peptostreptococcus were the main bacteria that affected the in vitro fermentation parameters of goats, sheep, and cows.
Collapse
|