Factors associated with high pain catastrophizing in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

No Difference in 2-Year Outcomes for Non-Hypermobile Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy With and Without Closure of Periportal Capsulotomy

PURPOSE

To assess whether capsular closure during hip arthroscopy with periportal capsulotomy affects 2-year postoperative outcomes for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) without hypermobility.

METHODS

A matched-cohort retrospective analysis of a single institutional database of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with periportal capsulotomy for management of FAIS between 2014 and 2022 was performed. Study inclusion criteria consisted of patients with FAIS who exhibited no signs of generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL) (Beighton score 0). Patients with evidence of hip osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade >1) and hip dysplasia and those undergoing revision surgery were excluded. Capsular closure was performed via a simple suture configuration through the mid-anterior portal. The capsular closure group (n = 51) was matched 1:1 by age, sex, and body mass index with the nonclosure group. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys, including the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, 12-item Short-Form Survey, and visual analog scale for pain, were completed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Mean score change was calculated across all PROs, and unpaired samples t tests were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

The overall matched cohort included 90 patients and 102 hips (age: 30.5 ± 9.5 years; body mass index: 23.3 ± 2.6; 66.7% male), with no differences in demographic or preoperative hip characteristics. Both groups achieved significant score improvements in all PROs at 2 years (P < .001), except 12-item Short-Form Survey Mental Component Summary, which remained unchanged. There was no difference in 2-year postoperative mean score change between the closure and nonclosure groups, and both groups achieved minimal clinically important difference (60.8%-84.3% vs 54.9%-86.3%), patient acceptable symptom state (60.8%-84.3% vs 52.9%-76.5%), and substantial clinical benefit (54.9%-76.5% vs 47.1%-64.7%) thresholds at similar rates across all PROs, with no complications or conversions to total hip arthroplasty, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with FAIS without hypermobility (Beighton score of 0) undergoing periportal capsulotomy during hip arthroscopy, capsular closure showed no differences in 2-year postoperative outcomes compared to nonclosure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective matched-cohort study.

Self-reported preoperative anxiety and depression associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for periacetabular osteotomy and hip arthroscopy surgery

Adverse mental health status has been linked to less successful surgical outcomes across several orthopaedic subspecialties. Mental health represents a modifiable risk factor that can be optimized preoperatively to maximize outcomes for hip preservation surgery. This study examines the relationship between preoperative mental health status and preoperative and postoperative outcomes for adolescent and adult patients undergoing hip preservation surgery. A prospectively enrolled registry of patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy or hip arthroscopy at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 was retrospectively reviewed to collect demographics and outcomes before and after surgery. We identified patients self-reporting anxiety/depression or no anxiety/depression preoperatively based on responses to the EuroQol-5D anxiety/depression dimension and compared their preoperative and postoperative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOSs) using multivariable linear models and multivariable mixed effects models. Seventy-three patients were included, 40 patients with no anxiety/depression and 33 patients with anxiety/depression. Patients with anxiety/depression had worse preoperative HOOS pain (b = -12.5, P = .029), function in daily living (b = -12.0, P = .045), function in sports and recreational activities (b = -15.1, P = .030), and quality of life (b = -16.3, P = .005) as compared to patients with no anxiety/depression. Patients with anxiety/depression had worse postoperative HOOS compared to patients with no anxiety/depression, but these associations were not statistically significant after adjusting for preoperative HOOS. There were no significant differences between both groups for percent achieving minimal clinically important difference. Patients who reported anxiety/depression preoperatively had worse preoperative pain and function before hip preservation surgery, with both groups achieving similar levels of clinical effectiveness.

The critical importance of recognition, evaluation, and management of mental health on outcomes following hip arthroscopy - A synthetic narrative review: Current concepts

Mental health and wellness influence patients with hip pain and dysfunction secondary to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome, acetabular dysplasia, and labral injury. Disorders of mental wellness may impact hip preservation surgery patients both before and after surgery. Major depression and generalized anxiety are the two most common diagnoses that affect hip preservation surgery patients. There are dozens of unique questionnaires that can subjectively and objectively characterize the mental health of patients with hip pain. Pain threshold and pain tolerance are two issues that must be recognized to optimally predict treatment outcome in an informed consent shared decision-making discussion. Patient expectations may also significantly influence preoperative symptoms and postoperative outcome. Pain threshold, pain tolerance, and patient expectations are entities traditionally viewed as qualitative and unmeasurable. However, many valid and reliable methods exist to quantitatively assess these patient-specific variables. Recent original research and synthetic review publications have consistently concluded similar findings: patients with disorders of mental wellness generally have lower preoperative patient-reported outcome scores, do improve following surgery, albeit to a lesser magnitude than non-mental disorder patients, and ultimately have lower postoperative scores at their final follow. As with most orthopaedic surgery literature, the investigation of mental health and hip preservation is primarily via retrospective level four evidence with small numbers of patients from a single centre and single surgeon at short-term follow-up. Although hip preservation surgeons are orthopaedic surgeons by training and practice, they must be able to recognize mental wellness disorders and either treat or refer when suspected or identified.

Hip Preservation Surgery in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Acetabular Dysplasia Improves Functional Measures and Pain Catastrophizing

Background Chronic hip pain is a debilitating condition that severely reduces one's quality of life. Prior studies uncovered a link between hip pathologies and pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether hip preservation surgery in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and acetabular dysplasia (AD) improves functional outcomes and pain catastrophizing. Methods Patients with FAIS and AD were requested to complete a hip questionnaire both preoperatively and postoperatively at a single academic center (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA). Pain catastrophizing was evaluated using the pain catastrophizing scale, and pain level was assessed using the visual analog scale. Assessments of hip functional outcomes included the hip outcome score (HOS) and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). Outcome measures before and after treatment were compared using the dependent samples t-test. A correlation analysis, using the Spearman partial correlation coefficient (rs), was conducted to evaluate the relationship between variables. Results The results indicated a clinically significant improvement in functional measures and pain catastrophizing in patients who underwent hip preservation surgery. The most significant discovery was an inverse relationship between both HOOS quality of life (rs=-0.293, p=0.0065, false discovery rate (FDR)=0.0210) and HOS activities of daily living (rs=-0.242, p=0.0254, FDR=0.0423) and pain catastrophizing; however, similar improvements were seen in pain catastrophizing with improvements in other functional outcomes. Conclusion Undergoing hip preservation surgery for patients with AD or FAIS improved their hip functional measures and decreased pain catastrophizing postoperatively. The improvement of hip function, quality of life, and pain catastrophizing reveals an intricate link between the functional outcomes of hip preservation surgery and pain catastrophizing.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale Associated With Other Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Plantar Fasciitis and Chronic Ankle Instability Patients

BACKGROUND

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a measure of how patients emotionally respond to pain. It is composed of 3 subscales-rumination, magnification, and helplessness-which address intrusive thoughts of pain, expectations of negative outcomes, and inability to cope with pain. Our purpose is to compare baseline PCS scores with other baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF) or chronic ankle instability (CAI).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 201 patients who reported at least 1 pretreatment PCS subscore and were diagnosed with PF or CAI between 2015 and 2020 in a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon's clinic. Demographics, comorbidities, treatments, other baseline PROMs (i.e., visual analog scale [VAS], Pain Disability Index [PDI], 12-Item Short Form Survey [SF-12], 8-Item Somatic Symptom Scale [SSS-8]), and postoperative outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The PCS total score and its subscores significantly correlated with the total score and/or subscores of each PROM. Higher PCS total score significantly correlated with worse VAS (P<.001), SF-12 mental (P=.007), PDI total (P<.001), and SSS-8 (P<.001) scores. Only the PCS magnification subscore was significantly greater among patients who did (n=41) undergo surgery (P=.043). Those who had previously undergone foot and/or ankle surgery had significantly higher PCS rumination (P=.012), magnification (P=.006), helplessness (P=.008), and total (P=.003) scores. Likewise, those with a history of substance abuse also had significantly higher PCS scores (P=.005; P=.003; P=.006; P=.003).

CONCLUSION

The correlations between PCS scores and other baseline PROMs indicate that strong pain catastrophizers with PF or CAI may be at risk for poor treatment outcomes. PCS scores could be used to help with treatment for such high-risk patients.

The influence of pain catastrophizing and central sensitization on the reported pain after hip arthroscopy

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to investigate whether the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and the central sensitization inventory (CSI) are predictive factors for the reported pain after hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

A total of 37 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears were prospectively enrolled. All patients completed the PCS and CSI before hip arthroscopy. Postoperative pain was measured with the numeric rating scale (NRS) weekly the first 12 weeks after surgery by electronic diary.

RESULTS

At baseline, univariate analyses showed that both the CSI and PCS were significantly associated with the NRS outcome (p < 0.01). During 12 weeks follow-up, a significant decrease on the NRS was observed (p < 0.01). Univariate analyses showed that both the CSI and PCS were significantly associated with the NRS during follow-up. Multivariate mixed model analysis showed that only the PCS remained significantly associated with the NRS outcome with a ß of 0.07 (95% CI 0.03-0.11, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that both the PCS and CSI are associated with the reported postoperative pain after hip arthroscopy. The PCS and CSI may be useful in daily practice to identify patients that possibly benefit from pain catastrophizing reduction therapy (e.g. counseling) prior to surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.