Surgical and perioperative treatment strategy for resectable esophagogastric junction cancer

Salvage radiotherapy for locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after surgery

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes and prognostic factors associated with salvage radiotherapy in patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed 80 patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after surgery who were treated with radiotherapy. The median dose was 60 Gy, and 29 patients (36%) received elective nodal irradiation. Fifty-three patients (66%) received concurrent chemotherapy (mostly 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) during radiotherapy. Overall survival, progression-free survival and in-field recurrence rate were assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 17 months. Two-year overall survival, progression-free survival and in-field recurrence rate were 50.3%, 23.5% and 41.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a maximum diameter of locoregional recurrence lesions <30 mm was associated with higher overall survival (P = 0.044). Disease-free interval between surgery and locoregional recurrence >14 months was associated with higher PFS (P = 0.003). Late grade 3 toxicities occurred in three patients (3.8%). No grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage radiotherapy demonstrated efficacy in achieving in-field control with acceptable toxicity. However, the high rate of out-of-field metastases led to poor progression-free survival and overall survival, particularly in cases involving large lesions and a short disease-free interval. A prospective study is warranted to establish a treatment strategy, particularly considering the combined use of effective anti-cancer drugs.

Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative bleeding in patients with Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma treated by two minimally invasive surgeries and its influence on prognosis: a retrospective study

Background

The present study aimed to analyze the independent risk factors for intraoperative bleeding in Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) using two minimally invasive surgical approaches, namely, the laparoscopy-assisted abdominal trans-hiatal (LTH) method and transthoracic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE).

Methods

The clinical data of 100 patients with SiewertII AEG admitted to our hospital from October 2017 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the type of surgery, the patients were divided into LTH approach group and TLE approach group. The differences between the clinical characteristics of the patients in different groups and the differences in the intraoperative bleeding and prognosis between different surgical procedures were analyzed and compared using the t-test and chi-squared test. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the independent risk factors affecting the amount of intraoperative bleeding in patients.

Results

The results of this study showed that patients in the LTH group had significantly less intraoperative bleeding and operative time and significantly better postoperative recovery than the TLE group. The results of multivariate linear regression showed that the combined trans-thoracic-abdominal approach (P=0.000), advanced age (P=0.014), larger BMI (P=0.000), and larger tumor diameter (P=0.001) were the independent risk factors influencing the increase in intraoperative bleeding.

Conclusion

In addition to the conventional factors that affect intraoperative bleeding, such as the patient's general condition, operation time, and tumor size, LTH surgery is another way to avoid intraoperative bleeding for Siewert type II AEG patients and can significantly improve postoperative recovery.

DNA methylation-mediated suppression of TUSC1 expression regulates the malignant progression of esophagogastric junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction cancer (EJC) refers to malignant tumors that develop at the junction between the stomach and the esophagus. TUSC1 is a recently identified tumor suppressor gene known for its involvement in various types of cancer. The objective of this investigation was to elucidate the regulatory influence of DNA methylation on TUSC1 expression and its role in the progression of EJC.

METHODS

Bioinformatics software was utilized to analyze the expression of TUSC1, enriched pathways, and highly methylated sites in the promoter region. TUSC1 expression in EJC was assessed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blot (WB), and immunohistochemistry. Methylation-specific PCR was employed to detect the methylation level of TUSC1. To analyze the effects of TUSC1 and 5-AZA-2 on tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, cell cycle, and apoptosis, several assays including CCK-8, colony formation, transwell, and flow cytometry were conducted. The expression of MDM2 was assessed using qRT-PCR and WB. WB detected the expression of p53, and p-p53, markers for EJC cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and apoptosis. The role of TUSC1 in tumor occurrence in vivo was examined using a xenograft mouse model.

RESULTS

TUSC1 expression was significantly downregulated in EJC. Overexpression of TUSC1 and treatment with 5-AZA-2 inhibited the malignant progression of EJC cells. In EJC, low methylation levels promoted the expression of TUSC1. Upregulation of TUSC1 suppressed the expression of MDM2 and activated the p53 signaling pathway. Inactivation of this pathway attenuated the inhibitory effect of TUSC1 overexpression on EJC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and other behaviors. Animal experiments demonstrated that TUSC1 overexpression inhibited EJC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo.

CONCLUSION

TUSC1 was commonly downregulated in EJC and regulated by methylation. It repressed the malignant progression of EJC tumors by mediating the p53 pathway, suggesting its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for EJC.

Development of a novel staging classification for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Stage classification for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been established.

AIM

To investigate the optimal stage classification for Siewert II AEG with NAC.

METHODS

A nomogram was established based on Cox regression model that analyzed variables associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The nomogram performance in terms of discrimination and calibration ability was evaluated using the likelihood-ratio test, Akaike information criterion, Harrell concordance index, time-receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 725 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and gastrectomy were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that sex, marital status, race, ypT stage, and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors of OS, whereas sex, race, ypT stage, and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors for DSS. These factors were incorporated into the OS and DSS nomograms. Our novel nomogram model performed better in terms of OS and DSS prediction compared to the 8^th American Joint Committee of Cancer pathological staging system for esophageal and gastric cancer. Finally, a user-friendly web application was developed for clinical use.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram established specifically for patients with Siewert type II AEG receiving NAC demonstrated good prognostic performance. Validation using external data is warranted before its widespread clinical application.

Development of a novel staging classification for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Stage classification for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been established.

AIM

To investigate the optimal stage classification for Siewert II AEG with NAC.

METHODS

A nomogram was established based on Cox regression model that analyzed variables associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The nomogram performance in terms of discrimination and calibration ability was evaluated using the likelihood-ratio test, Akaike information criterion, Harrell concordance index, time-receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 725 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and gastrectomy were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that sex, marital status, race, ypT stage, and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors of OS, whereas sex, race, ypT stage, and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors for DSS. These factors were incorporated into the OS and DSS nomograms. Our novel nomogram model performed better in terms of OS and DSS prediction compared to the 8th American Joint Committee of Cancer pathological staging system for esophageal and gastric cancer. Finally, a user-friendly web application was developed for clinical use.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram established specifically for patients with Siewert type II AEG receiving NAC demonstrated good prognostic performance. Validation using external data is warranted before its widespread clinical application.

Surgical and Perioperative Treatments for Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

Esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) is a rare malignant disease that occurs in the gastroesophageal transition zone. In recent years, its incidence has been rapidly increasing not only in Western countries but also in East Asia, and it has been attracting the attention of both clinicians and researchers. EGJC has a worse prognosis than gastric cancer (GC) and is characterized by complex lymphatic drainage pathways in the mediastinal and abdominal regions. EGJC was previously treated in the same way as GC or esophageal cancer, but, in recent years, it has been treated as an independent malignant disease, and treatment focusing only on EGJC has been developed. A recent multicenter prospective study revealed the frequency of lymph node metastasis by station and established the optimal extent of lymph node dissection. In perioperative treatment, the combination of multi-drug chemotherapy, radiation therapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy is expected to improve the prognosis. In this review, we summarize previous clinical trials and their important evidence on surgical and perioperative treatments for EGJC.

Essential updates 2021/2022: Perioperative and surgical treatments for gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer

In recent years, important clinical trials for gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) have been reported, changing the strategies of surgical and perioperative treatment. Although laparoscopic gastrectomy has already been shown to be effective for early-stage cancer, recent evidence from both Asia (JLSSG0901, CLASS-01 and KLASS-02) and Europe (LOGICA and STOMACH trials) has demonstrated that it is useful for advanced GC. Robotic surgery has been rapidly gaining popularity in recent years, and randomized controlled trials are ongoing to evaluate its efficacy. A prospective nationwide multicenter study mapped sites with frequent metastasis and revealed lymphatic flow specific to EGJC, thus establishing the optimal lymph node dissection area and surgical approach based on esophageal involvement. Perioperative chemotherapy, the mainstay of treatment in Europe, also has been established in Asia by the PRODIGY and RESOLVE studies. New clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy or molecular-targeted therapy with perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. In this review, we present important recent clinical trials regarding the treatment of GC and EGJC published in 2021 or 2022.

Management of Esophago-Gastric Junction Carcinoma: A Narrative Multidisciplinary Review

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma represents a specific site of disease, given the opportunities for multimodal clinical care and management and the possibilities of combined treatments. It encompasses various clinical subgroups of disease that are heterogeneous and deserve different treatments; therefore, the guidelines have progressively evolved over time, considering the evidence provided by clinical trials. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the main evidence, which orientates the current guidelines, and to collect the main ongoing studies to address existing gray areas.

Multimodal treatments for resectable esophagogastric junction cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To comprehensively investigate the optimal multimodal treatment of resectable esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched until March 11, 2022. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), locoregional and distant recurrence, and R0 resection. Network plots, forest plots and league tables were drawn for each outcome. Rank probabilities for different treatments in each outcome were also depicted.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 18,319 EGJ participants were included. No significant differences in OS between any two of the 6 treatments. Perioperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) had the highest probability (36.03%) to be the optimal treatment as regards OS. Patients undergoing pCRT had a significantly lower incidence of locoregional recurrence than those undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), perioperative chemotherapy (pCT), or surgery alone (S). Patients with pCRT had the greatest likelihood (68.86%) to have the lowest incidence of locoregional recurrence. Comparable impacts of the 6 treatments on the incidence of distant recurrence, and pCRT was most likely (46.65%) to be the optimal treatment with respect to distant recurrence. Neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) was associated with a significantly increased incidence of R0 resection compared with nCT or S, and nCRT had the highest probability (97.68%) to be the best therapy regarding R0 resection.

CONCLUSION

For patients with resectable EGJ cancer, pCRT may be the optimal multimodal treatment regarding survival and recurrence.

Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for clinical stage III gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

Background

Although perioperative treatment has been the standard of care for resectable gastric cancer in the West, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is still the standard in Japan. We conducted the first phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy for cStage III gastric or esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma in Japan.

Methods

Eligibility criteria included cStage III adenocarcinoma of the stomach or EGJ. Patients received docetaxel (40 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1), or S-1 (80 mg/m2, days 1-14) during a 3-week cycle. After two or three cycles of DOS, patients underwent surgical resection. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Between June 2015 and March 2019, 50 patients were enrolled from four institutions. Of 48 eligible patients (37 gastric and 11 EGJ adenocarcinoma), 42 (88%) completed two or three DOS cycles. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and diarrhea occurred in 69% and 19% of patients, respectively, but there were no treatment-related deaths. R0 resection was achieved in 44 (92%) patients, and the pathological response rate (≥ grade 1b) was 63% (30/48). The 3-year PFS, overall survival, and disease-specific survival rates were 54.2%, 68.7%, and 75.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy had a sufficient antitumor effect and tolerable safety profile in patients with gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma. The survival benefit of a neoadjuvant strategy using our DOS regimen should be validated in phase 3 trials.

Comparison of McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

There are two most widely used transthoracic esophagectomy methods: the McKeown Minimally Invasive esophagectomy (McKeown MIE) and the Sweet Esophagectomy. We evaluated and compared the therapeutic effects of these two methods to determine the appropriate method for the treatment of middle and lower third esophageal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NACI). We retrospectively analyzed 43 sweet esophagectomy cases received NACI and 167 cases with McKeown MIE in the fourth hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2019 to May 2022. This retrospective observational study showed that Sweet esophagectomy and McKeown MIE after NACI therapy for resectable ESCC patients appeared to be safe with low operative mortality and morbidity rate in the current population. In addition, sweet esophagectomy was associated with a lower incidence of severe complications and shorter hospital stay for patients over 70 years of age compared with McKeown MIE. There were no differences were found in length of stay, mortality and complication incidence rate between the two groups. The Sweet approach has advantage in hospital stay for the treatment of the elderly NACI patients with middle or lower third esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In conclusion, Sweet esophagectomy and McKeown MIE are both safe, effective, and worthwhile approaches for ESCC patients in immunotherapy age.