Retrospective comparison of the AJCC 5th edition classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with the AJCC 4th edition: an experience in Taiwan

Should All Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Paranasal Sinus Invasion Be Staged as T3 in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era? A Study of 1811 Cases

Background: Currently, there is no uniform consensus regarding the appropriate staging for invasion of the paranasal sinuses in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In the current AJCC staging system for NPC, paranasal sinus invasion is defined within the T3 classification. However, according to the Chinese 2008 staging system, which is also widely used in the regions where NPC is endemic in China, paranasal sinus invasion is classified as T4 disease.

Methods: Patients (n = 1811) with non-metastatic, histologically-proven NPC treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Paranasal sinus invasion was identified in 289/1811 patients (16.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed ethmoid sinus invasion (HR, 2.889; 95% CI, 1.362-6.131; P = 0.006) and maxillary sinus invasion (HR, 3.110; 95% CI, 1.439-6.721; P = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors for local relapse-free survival (LRFS). T3 patients with ethmoid sinus or maxillary sinus invasion had similar 3-year LRFS (83.6% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.132) as T4 patients, and had poorer LRFS (83.6% vs. 98.3%, P = 0.006) than T3 patients with sphenoid sinus invasion alone. Also, T3 patients with sphenoid sinus invasion alone had similar 3-year LRFS (98.3 vs. 96.4%, P = 0.391) as T3 patients without paranasal sinus invasion, and a trend toward higher LRFS (98.3% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.065) than T4 patients.

Conclusion: In patients underwent IMRT, tumors with ethmoid sinus or maxillary sinus invasion had a higher risk of local failure than those with sphenoid sinus invasion alone. Sphenoid sinus invasion alone should be classified as T3 disease and ethmoid sinus or maxillary sinus involvement as T4 disease in the current AJCC staging system for NPC.

Photodynamic therapy in the therapy for recurrent/persistent nasopharyngeal cancer

To determine the efficacy of Photodynamic therapy of patients with recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma we reviewed all available literature.

Since the treatment options for recurrent or persistent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma are limited, the survival rates poor and the complications severe; there is definitely a place for alternative treatment modalities with more efficacy and less morbidity. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has the potential to be a very effective local treatment modality for recurrent or persistent nasopharyngeal cancer, without the severe side effects seen with re-irradiation. This review shows all reported results of Photodynamic therapy in the treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Effect of lymphadenectomy extent on advanced gastric cancer located in the cardia and fundus

AIM: To analyze the prognostic impact of lymphade-nectomy extent in advanced gastric cancer located in the cardia and fundus.

METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients with advanced gastric cancer located in the cardia and fundus who underwent D2 curative resection were analyzed retrospectively. Relationships between the numbers of lymph nodes (LNs) dissected and survival was analyzed among different clinical stage subgroups.

RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate of the entire cohort was 37.5%. Multivariate prognostic variables were total LNs dissected (P < 0.0001; or number of negative LNs examined, P < 0.0001), number of positive LNs (P < 0.0001), T category (P < 0.0001) and tumor size (P = 0.015). The greatest survival differences were observed at cutoff values of 20 LNs resected for stage II (P = 0.0136), 25 for stage III(P < 0.0001), 30 for stage IV (P = 0.0002), and 15 for all patients (P = 0.0024). Based on the statistically assumed linearity as best fit, linear regression showed a significant survival enhancement based on increasing negative LNs for patients of stages III (P = 0.013) and IV (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION: To improve the long-term survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer located in the cardia and fundus, removing at least 20 LNs for stage II, 25 LNs for stage III, and 30 LNs for stage IVpatients during D2 radical dissection is recommended.

Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with radiation in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a phase II trial using paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with radiation (TFHX).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with locally advanced NPC were treated with CRT consisting of 4-day continuous infusions of paclitaxel (20 mg/m(2)/d) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2)/d), and oral hydroxyurea 500 mg bid for nine doses, every 3 weeks concurrent with radiotherapy (RT). RT consisted of once daily 200cGy fractions 5 times per week to a total of 7000cGy.

RESULTS

Complete response was seen in 86% and 71% of patients at 4 and 12 months after CRT. The median follow-up was 34 months. Twenty-three patients experienced relapse. Sixteen deaths occurred: 13 from progressive disease. Three-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 72% and 54% respectively, with locoregional and distant control rates of 83% and 64% at 3 years respectively. Grade 3 to 4 acute toxicities included oropharyngeal mucositis in 81% of patients treated, dermatitis in 63%, weight loss in 32%, and neutropenia in 22%. Neutropenic fever was seen in 14%. There were no treatment-related deaths from acute toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

TFHX is shown to be feasible in NPC. Non-cross resistant induction chemotherapy should be further studied with this regimen.

Another way to estimate outcome of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma—is concurrent chemoradiotherapy adequate?

PURPOSE

To evaluate a simple risk grouping system and determine whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is adequate for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 284 patients with 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage III to IV (M0) NPC were analyzed retrospectively. They were treated by either radiotherapy (RT) alone or CCRT. We divided patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups according to our experience. High-risk patients met at least one of the following criteria: (1) nodal size >6 cm, (2) supraclavicular node metastases, (3) 1992 AJCC stage T4N2, (4) multiple neck node metastases with 1 node >4 cm. The disease extent of each patient was stratified by our risk grouping system, AJCC 1992 and 1997 staging systems. Survival analyses-including nasopharynx disease free (TS), neck disease free (NS), distant metastasis disease free (MS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free (PFS) survival curves-were compared between these three different classifications.

RESULTS

According to the 1992 AJCC staging system, 80.3% (228/284) of NPC patients are Stage IV, whereas only 19.7% are Stage III. Most patients are downstaged by the 1997 AJCC staging system with 28.5% (81/284) Stage IV and 71.5% (203/284) Stage III/II. Our risk criteria stratify more even patient distribution, because 119 patients (41.9%) are assigned to the high-risk group and 165 patients (58.1%) to the low-risk group. Log-rank test of Kaplan-Meier survival curves, multivariate comparison of the Cox proportional hazards model, and 3 goodness-of-fit indices validated that our risk grouping system seemed to be at least as efficacious as, or slightly superior to, the 1992 and 1997 AJCC systems. The 5-year TS (95.1% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.0012), NS (100% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.0974), MS (90.5% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.0282), OS (83.2% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.0041), and PFS (87.3% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.0003) were significantly better in patients receiving CCRT than RT alone for the low-risk group. However, the corresponding survival rates between CCRT and RT for high-risk patients were 74.9% vs. 67.6% (p = 0.2545) for TS, 92.1% vs. 86.8% (p = 0.4744) for NS, 59.7% vs. 60.0% (p = 0.5537) for MS, 55.8% vs. 46.3% (p = 0.1761) for OS, and 44.5% vs. 43.1% (p = 0.3911) for PFS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is superior to RT alone for low-risk patients but inadequate for high-risk patients. Adding neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy would be a reasonable approach for high-risk patients. Our risk grouping criteria are a simple and useful guide that will have important implications in the design of future therapeutic trials.

Non-metastatic stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: analysis of the pattern of relapse and survival

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to analyze the mode of recurrence patterns and survival of our 96 non-metastatic stage IVA and IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 234 previously untreated, histologically confirmed non-metastatic NPC patients were treated in our department between 1993 and 2001. Among them 96 patients (41%) were staged as IVA or B disease. All patients were uniformly staged using the fifth edition of AJCC/UICC staging system. There were 76 male and 20 female patients. Their ages ranged from 9 to 72 years (median age: 43.5). Histopathological diagnosis was WHO 2 and 3 in 89 (93%) patients. All patients were treated with external radiotherapy and 77 out of 96 patients (80%) with stage IV disease received either concomitant or neoadjuvant cisplatin based combined chemotherapy regimens. Median follow-up time was 30 months (range: 4-101 months).

RESULTS

At the time of this analysis, 60 (62%) patients were alive and 48 of them were free of disease. Local recurrence rate was found to be significantly higher in stage IVA patients (28 vs. 11%, P=0.02) and distant metastasis rate was significantly higher in stage IVB patients (40 vs. %8, P=0.0001). The 3 year overall (OS), disease free (DFS), loco regional relapse free (LRRFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) rates were 71, 74, 77 and 94% for stage IVA and 60, 46, 77 and 58% for stage IVB patients, respectively. Three year LRFS rates for stage IVA and IVB were 77 and 89%, respectively (P=0.1). Age older than 40 years was found to be statistically significant adverse prognostic factor both for OS (P=0.01) and LRRFS (P=0.005) in univariate analysis. Advanced N status was an unfavorable prognostic factor both for OS (P=0.03), DFS (P=0.0004) and DMFS (P=0.0003). DMFS was adversely affected by the presence of cranial nerve palsy at diagnosis (P=0.01), advanced T status (P=0.03) and advanced N status (P=0.0003). In univariate analysis treatment with chemotherapy was found to be an unfavorable prognostic factor for DMFS (P=0.02). According to the multivariate analysis, older age (>40 year of age) was a significant independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.02), DFS (P=0.05) and LRRFS (P=0.01). Patients with advanced N status had worse OS (P=0.03), DFS (P<0.0001) and DMFS (P=0.07). Patients treated with chemotherapy as an adjuvant to radiotherapy had tended to have a better DFS (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The local relapse was the major cause of failure in patients with stage IVA disease, and distant metastasis was the predominant treatment failure in stage IVB patients. While stage IVA patients may benefit more intensive local treatment strategies, stage IVB patients definitely need more systemic treatment.

Treatment outcome after radiotherapy alone for patients with Stage I-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to review the long-term treatment outcome of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 1997 Stage I-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who were treated with radiotherapy alone.

METHODS

One hundred forty-one patients with NPC had AJCC 1997 Stage I-II disease (Stage I NPC, 50 patients; Stage II NPC, 91 patients) after restaging and were treated with radiotherapy alone between September 1989 and August 1991. Fifty-seven patients had lymph node disease, and the median greatest lymph node dimension was 3 cm. The median dose to the nasopharynx was 65 grays. The median follow-up was 82 months (range, 4-141 months).

RESULTS

Patients who had Stage I disease had an excellent outcome after radiotherapy. The 10-year disease specific survival, recurrence free survival (RFS), local RFS, lymph node RFS, and distant metastasis free survival rates were 98%, 94%, 96%, 98%, and 98%, respectively. Patients who had Stage II disease had a worse outcome compared with patients who had Stage I disease: The corresponding 10-year survival rates were 60%, 51%, 78%, 93%, and 64%. The differences all were significant except for lymph node control. Among patients who had Stage II disease, those with T1-T2N1 NPC appeared to have a worse outcome compared with patients who had T2N0 NPC. No significant differences in survival rates were found with respect to lymph node size or status for patients with T1-T2N1 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

When patients with NPC had their disease staged according to the AJCC 1997 classification system, patients with Stage I disease had an excellent outcome after they were treated with radiotherapy alone. Patients with Stage II disease, especially those with T1-T2N1 disease, had a relatively worse outcome, and more aggressive therapy, such as combined-modality treatment, may be indicated for those patients.

In-depth evaluation of the AJCC/UICC 1997 staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic homogeneity and proposed refinements

PURPOSE

To critically evaluate the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) 1997 staging system and look back on its achievements by comparing it with the AJCC/UICC 1992 and Ho 1978 staging systems. To identify areas for additional refinement, we analyzed the prognostic heterogeneity within each stage in depth, which provided important clues for the addition or better categorization of the different defining criteria.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a retrospective review of the data from 1294 consecutive biopsy-proven nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and staged the extent of disease according to the defining criteria of the three staging systems. All patients had undergone detailed pretreatment assessment by fiberoptic endoscopy and CT. Radical-intent radiotherapy was given using the Ho technique according to our standard protocol.

RESULTS

The AJCC/UICC 1997 staging system was superior to the other two staging systems, because it assigned patients to more uniform-size stage groupings and correlated better with prognosis. Parapharyngeal space involvement was not an independent predictor for survival, local control, or metastasis. On the other hand, carotid space involvement correlated with a greater likelihood of metastasis. Prognostic heterogeneity was found. Those with orbit, cranial nerve, or intracranial involvement fared worse within Stage T4; those with a maximal lymph node size >3 cm fared worse within Stage N2; and those with bilateral lymph node metastasis fared worse within Stage N3.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic accuracy of the AJCC/UICC 1997 staging system can be improved further by recategorization of the T, N, and group stage criteria.