Combined immunotherapy with low-dose IL-2 plus IFN-alpha for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: survival benefit for selected patients with lung metastasis and serum sodium level

Sodium Levels and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Nivolumab

IMPORTANCE

Low sodium levels have been associated with negative outcomes among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving therapies other than immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of natremia in patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab as a second-line or subsequent therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this retrospective cohort study, the clinical and biochemical data of patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab were collected from October 2015 to November 2019 as part of a multicenter Italian study. Data analysis was performed from February to March 2023.

EXPOSURE

Nivolumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and, since May 2018, at a fixed dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their median serum sodium value (<140 or ≥140 mEq/L).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the associations of pre-ICI and post-ICI sodium levels with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and disease control rate (DCR). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS, and differences between groups were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 401 patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab as second-line therapy were evaluated, and 355 eligible patients (median [range] age, 76 [44-84] years; 258 male patients [72.7%]) were included in the final cohort. Among patients with pre-ICI sodium greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L compared with those with sodium less than 140 mEq/L, the median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.5-11.5 months) vs 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.6-10.1 months; P = .90), and the median OS was 29.2 months (95% CI, 21.8-35.9 months) vs 20.0 months (95% CI, 14.1-26.8 months; P = .03). Patients with post-ICI sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L had longer PFS (11.1 months [95% CI, 8.5-1.5 months] vs 5.1 months [95% CI, 4.1-7.5 months]; P = .01) and OS (32.9 months [95% CI, 25.1-42.6 months] vs 17.1 months [95% CI, 12.6-24.5 months]; P = .006) compared with patients with sodium values less than 140 mEq/L. Patients with both pre-ICI and post-ICI sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L exhibited a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with those with a value less than 140 mEq/L (PFS, 11.5 months [95% CI, 8.8-16.4 months] vs 5.8 months [95% CI, 4.4-8.3 months]; P = .008); OS, 37.6 months [95% CI, 29.0-49.9 months] vs 19.4 months [95% CI, 14.1-24.5 months]; P = .01). Moreover, sodium levels greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L were associated with significantly better DCR than lower sodium levels.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this retrospective cohort study of patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab, sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L, both before and/or after ICI, were associated with better OS and PFS, as well as a higher DCR, compared with levels less than 140 mEq/L. These findings suggest that sodium levels may be associated with survival outcomes in patients with mRCC and may have potential use as variables to consider in patients' risk scores.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Cytokines versus Sunitinib and Second-Line Axitinib for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESCAPE Study): A Phase III, Randomized, Sequential Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND

The sequence of first-line cytokine and second-line molecular targeted therapies may be suitable for some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) because of the expectation of complete remission and durable response achieved with cytokine therapy.

METHODS

This was a phase III randomized controlled trial investigating the outcomes of low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus interferon alfa (IFNα) versus sunitinib as the first line and axitinib as the second line in patients with low- and intermediate-risk mRCC.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned. The total progression-free survival (PFS) to the end of the second line was 29.0 months (95% CI, 11.7-46.3) in the IL-2 + IFNα group and 16.3 months (95% CI, 6.3-26.4) in the sunitinib group. The PFS hazard ratio for the IL-2 + IFNα group relative to the sunitinib group was 0.401 (95% CI, 0.121-1.328; p = 0.135). The hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) was 1.675 (95% CI, 0.418-6.705; p = 0.466), which was better in the sunitinib group than in the IL-2 + IFNα group but not statistically significant. The types of adverse events (AEs) differed significantly, although there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a trend toward better total PFS for IL-2 + IFNα, but it was not significant. There was also no advantage of IL-2 + IFNα in terms of OS. The study was underpowered to draw any definitive conclusions. The results showed no clear advantage of IL-2 + IFNα over sunitinib in the first-line setting; however, it may be an option in some relatively low-risk mRCC cases due to the difference in the AE profile. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), center identifier UMIN 000012522.

Prognostic value of normal sodium levels in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Although serum sodium concentration, particularly hyponatremia, has been shown to be a prognostic marker of survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the impact of normal sodium levels has not been investigated. Herein, we investigate the influence of normonatremia in mRCC patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this retrospective study, the clinical and biochemical data of patients treated with first-line TKIs for mRCC were available from seven Italian cancer centers. We collected natremia levels at baseline and first evaluation after treatment excluding patients with sodium levels outside the normal range (<135 or >145 mEq/L). The remaining patients were subdivided into two groups according to the median sodium value: natremia patients with <140 mEq/L (n = 132) and baseline natremia patients with ≥140 mEq/L (n = 185). Subsequently, we analyzed the impact of sodium levels on response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were estimated through the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were examined by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to evaluate the prognostic factors for PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Of the 368 patients, 317 were included in the analysis, 73.1% were men, and the median age was 67 years (range 36-89). When comparing patients with baseline natremia ≥140 mEq/L (n = 185) to patients with natremia <140 mEq/L (n = 132), the PFS was 15 vs. 10 months (p < 0.01) and the OS was 63 vs. 36 months, respectively (p = 0.02). On the first evaluation, patients with serum sodium ≥140 mEq/L had longer PFS (15 vs. 10 months, p < 0.01) and OS (70 vs. 32 months, p < 0.01) than patients with levels <140 mEq/L. Moreover, clinical outcomes showed a significant improvement in patients with natremia ≥140 mEq/L compared with patients with levels <140 mEq/L both at baseline and first evaluation: PFS was 19 vs. 11 months (p < 0.01) and OS was 70 vs. 36 months (p < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of normonatremia in mRCC. We found that serum sodium levels <140 mEq/L at baseline and first assessment are independently associated with worse PFS and OS in mRCC patients treated with TKIs in the first-line setting.

Efficacy and safety of cytokines versus first-line sunitinib and second-line axitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ESCAPE study): A study protocol for phase III randomized sequential open-label study

Appropriate protocol for the sequential treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has not been established yet. Some mRCC cases with favorable risk were reported to achieve complete remission and durable response using interferon alfa (IFNα) + low dose interleukin-2 (IL-2). Cytokine therapies may be suitable for some patients with mRCC as first-line therapy. The present study is a phase III, investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial investigating patients with low and intermediate risk mRCC classified by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk criteria to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with cytokine (IFNα + IL-2) as first-line and axitinib as second-line therapy versus sequential treatment with sunitinib as first-line and axitinib as second-line therapy, which is the current standard treatment for patients with favorable risk. The target sample size was set at 72 patients per group (total 144 cases). The study duration is 7 years, and the duration for recruitment is 4 years. Our expectation of this trial is to clarify first- and second-line sequential treatment for mRCC better, especially in patients with favorable risk and some with intermediate risk. The results of this trial will certainly contribute to new information for the strategy of first- and second-line sequential treatment for mRCC.

Trial registration

University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center identifier UMIN 000012522.

IL-21 modulates memory and exhaustion phenotype of T-cells in a fatty acid oxidation-dependent manner

T-cell-based therapies represent a promising strategy for cancer treatment. In this context, cytokines are discussed as a bona fide instrument for fine-tuning T- cell biology. One promising candidate is the pleiotropic interleukin-21 (IL-21) with only little being known regarding its direct effects on human T-cells. Thus, we sought out to characterize the impact of IL-21 on T-cell metabolism, fitness, and differentiation. Culturing T-cells in presence of IL-21 elicited a metabolic skewing away from aerobic glycolysis towards fatty acid oxidation (FAO). These changes of the metabolic framework were paralleled by increased mitochondrial fitness and biogenesis. However, oxidative stress levels were not increased but rather decreased. Furthermore, elevated FAO and mitochondrial biomass together with enhanced antioxidative properties are linked to formation of longer lasting memory responses and less PD-1 expression. We similarly observed an IL-21-triggered induction of central memory-like T-cells and reduced levels of PD-1 on the cell surface. Taken together, IL-21 shifts T-cells towards an immunometabolic phenotype that has been associated with increased survivability and enhanced anti-tumor efficacy. In addition, our data reveals a novel interconnection between fatty acid metabolism and immune function regulated by IL 21.

Harnessing the immune system to improve cancer therapy

Cancer immunotherapy uses the immune system and its components to mount an anti-tumor response. During the last decade, it has evolved from a promising therapy option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic modalities are already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating cancer patients and many others are in the pipeline for approval as standalone or combinatorial therapeutic interventions, several also combined with standard treatments in clinical studies. The two main axes of cancer immunotherapeutics refer to passive and active treatments. Prominent examples of passive immunotherapy include administration of monoclonal antibodies and cytokines and adoptive cell transfer of ex vivo "educated" immune cells. Active immunotherapy refers, among others, to anti-cancer vaccines [peptide, dendritic cell (DC)-based and allogeneic whole cell vaccines], immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses, whereas new approaches that can further enhance anti-cancer immune responses are also widely explored. Herein, we present the most popular cancer immunotherapy approaches and discuss their clinical relevance referring to data acquired from clinical trials. To date, clinical experience and efficacy suggest that combining more than one immunotherapy interventions, in conjunction with other treatment options like chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted or epigenetic therapy, should guide the way to cancer cure.

Differential expression and clinical relevance of MUC1 in renal cell carcinoma metastasis

PURPOSE

To determine the differential expression patterns and prognostic relevance of Mucin-1 (MUC1) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastasis.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMA) from samples of 151 RCC metastases, 61 primary RCCs and corresponding benign renal tissues were immunohistochemically stained for MUC1 and semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunoreactivity scores (IRS). MUC1 differential expression in metastasis, primary RCC and normal tissue were comparatively analyzed. Patient characteristics and clinical follow-up for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) were recorded. Correlations of MUC1 expression with mRCC survival were determined.

RESULTS

Median cytoplasmic expression was highest in benign tissue (IRS = 1.04). Primary RCC (0.50) and metastasis (0.12) showed significantly lower cytoplasmic staining intensity. Membranous expression in benign tissue was, however, significantly lower (0.21) compared with primary RCC (0.59) and metastasis (0.57). Notable differences of MUC1 cytoplasmic and membranous expression were observed between different metastasis sites. Significantly higher (P = 0.014) membranous expression was observed in pulmonary versus non-pulmonary lesions, while no significant differences of cytoplasmic MUC1 expression were observed. The prognostic relevance of MUC1 expression in metastatic RCC was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

MUC1 is differentially expressed in benign renal tissue, primary RCC and RCC metastasis. Membranous MUC1 expression was significantly elevated in pulmonary metastases compared to non-pulmonary lesions, which may reflect individual biology and putative response to MUC1-based anti-cancer therapy.

Hyponatremia as a powerful prognostic predictor for Japanese patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of hyponatremia in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

METHODS

This study included a total of 209 consecutive Japanese patients undergoing radical nephrectomy who were subsequently treated with either sunitinib or sorafenib as a first-line therapy for metastatic clear cell RCC. In this series, normal natremia and hyponatremia prior to the introduction of TKI was defined as a serum sodium level >136 and ≤136 mEq/L, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into 165 (78.9 %) with normal natremia and 44 (21.1 %) with hyponatremia. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the hyponatremia group (median 10.0 months) was significantly poorer than that in the normal natremia group (median 28.4 months). Overall survival (OS) in the hyponatremia group (median 20.9 months) was significantly poorer than that in the normal natremia group (median 38.5 months). Multivariate analyses identified hyponatremia, in addition to the existence of sarcomatoid components in radical nephrectomy specimens, high serum C-reactive protein levels, and low serum albumin levels, as poor prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. There were significant differences in both PFS and OS according to the number of these 4 independent risk factors that were positive (negative for any risk factors vs positive for 1 or 2 risk factors vs positive for 3 or 4 risk factors).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyponatremia appears to be one of the most powerful prognostic predictors in Japanese patients treated with a TKI as a first-line agent against metastatic clear cell RCC.

Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Clinical data supporting the use of targeted agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are based predominantly on patients with clear cell histology. Little is known about the efficacy of these drugs in non-clear cell variants.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of different clear cell RCC (ccRCC)-approved targeted agents among patients with non-ccRCC compared with ccRCC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases to identify publications evaluating the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents approved for treatment of ccRCC. Patients with sarcomatoid variant RCC were excluded from the main analysis but were evaluated as an independent cohort. End points of interest were response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS). Where possible, data were pooled in a meta-analysis. For studies of unselected patients with RCC, the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC histology were compared with ccRCC. In exploratory analyses, outcomes of non-ccRCC with nonapproved agents were assessed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 49 studies comprising 7771 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1244 patients (16.0%) had non-ccRCC, 6300 (83.1%) had ccRCC, and 227 (2.9%) had sarcomatoid tumours. The overall response rate for non-ccRCC with targeted agents was 10.5%. In studies directly comparing non-ccRCC and ccRCC, there were significantly lower response rates for non-ccRCC (odds ratio for response: 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.68; p<0.001). For non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents, median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 13.4 mo, respectively; for patients with ccRCC, these were 10.5 mo and 15.7 mo, respectively (p value for difference<0.001 for both parameters).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) have significantly lower response rates and poorer median progression-free survival and overall survival than those with ccRCC. The optimal treatment of patients with non-ccRCC remains unclear and warrants further study.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Systemic treatments for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tend to be significantly less effective for non-clear cell RCC, with lower response rates and worse progression-free survival and overall survival when compared with clear cell RCC. Optimal therapy remains unclear and warrants further study.

Radiation-induced modulation of costimulatory and coinhibitory T-cell signaling molecules on human prostate carcinoma cells promotes productive antitumor immune interactions

We sought to determine if single-dose external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) could modulate the expression signature of T-cell costimulatory and coinhibitory molecules in human prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines in vitro. We investigated the functional impact of irradiated PCa cells with a modulated costimulatory profile on responder T-cell activity. We used three PCa cell lines (DU145, PC3, and LNCaP) and two epithelial cell lines from noncancerous prostate and lung tissue. After 72 hours of EBRT, surface expression of four immunostimulatory molecules (CD70, CD275/ICOSL, CD134L/OX40L, and CD137L/41BBL) and two immunosuppressive markers (CTLA-4/CD152 and PD-L1/CD274) were evaluated by flow cytometry. We evaluated the impact of several radiation doses and the longevity of modulated expression. We examined the functional impact of radiation-induced modulation of cancer cells by cytotoxic T cells (CTL) cytotoxicity and ELISPOT assay for interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production. Last, we evaluated whether IFN-γ-induced PD-L1 expression could be reversed by EBRT. After 10 Gy EBRT, expression of OX40L and 41BBL increased in all three PCa cell lines; expression of CD70 and ICOSL increased in PC3 cells. Conversely, a decrease in PD-L1 expression in DU145 and PC3 cells was detectable up to 144 hours after EBRT. No PD-L1 was detected in LNCaP. Epithelial cells from normal prostate were not modulated by radiation. CTL cytolytic activity and IFN-γ production were enhanced by interaction with irradiated PCa cells. Finally, EBRT failed to prevent IFN-γ-induced upregulation of PD-L1. We demonstrate that a single dose of EBRT increased surface expression of costimulatory molecules and decreased the expression of coinhibitory molecules in human PCa cell lines. Changes in irradiated tumor cells led to functional enhancement of T-cell activity, despite EBRT failing to reduce IFN-γ-induced expression of PD-L1. These data suggest that combining radiotherapy with T-cell stimulating immunotherapy may be an attractive strategy for cancer treatment.

Novel combination therapy with imiquimod and sorafenib for renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the combination of the imidazoquinoline immune response modifier, imiquimod, and the multitargeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, inhibits the growth of renal cell carcinoma in mice.

METHODS

Female BALB/c mice were implanted subcutaneously with 2 × 10(5) RENCA mouse kidney cancer cells, and were treated with transcutaneously applied cream containing imiquimod and oral administrations of sorafenib beginning 5 days after implantation of the cells. Tumor incidence and burden were determined at 28 days after initiation of therapy. T cell infiltration in the tumor was determined by immunofluorescence staining with anti-CD3-ε and CD8-α antibodies.

RESULTS

Therapy with imiquimod, sorafenib or their combination was well tolerated. Combination therapy with imiquimod and sorafenib significantly inhibited tumor growth when compared with administration of control vehicle, imiquimod or sorafenib alone (P < 0.05). The CD3- and CD8-positive T cells infiltrated into tumors to a greater degree in response to the combination therapy when compared with tumors treated with control vehicle or sorafenib alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and an imidazoquinoline could be a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, genetics, and therapeutic modalities

The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a major therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Despite advances in the understanding of the immunobiology of RCC and the availability of several novel targeted agents, there has been little improvement in the survival of patients with metastatic RCC. This review will focus on the recent understanding of risk factors and treatment options and outcomes of metastatic RCC, in particular, targeted therapeutic agents that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways. Prospective studies are required to determine whether sequential targeted therapy will further improve progression-free survival in RCC. Ongoing research to develop novel agents with better tolerability and enhanced efficacy in the treatment of metastatic RCC is required.

Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

In the past 5 years, the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed dramatically from being largely cytokine-based with the emergence of targeted therapy. Following the elucidation of various molecular pathways in renal cell carcinoma, targeted agents (particularly vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting antiangiogenic agents) now form the backbone of most therapeutic strategies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and the outcome of treatment has improved. However, many tumors eventually develop resistance to targeted therapy due to secondary mutation of the target protein or compensatory changes within the target pathway that bypass the site of inhibition. On the other hand, there are new forms of immunotherapy that hold the promise of improving the outcome for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In this article, we describe some of these new therapies, including the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, several receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, and tivozanib), the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus, and new immunotherapy modalities, such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody and anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 antibody. We also discuss their role in the current management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.