Investigation of the Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Patients With EGFR Exon 21 L858R Point Mutation-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has a higher response rate than with conventional chemotherapy in patients positive for EGFR mutations. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy may be reduced in patients positive for the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical characteristics of patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation-positive NSCLC who are non-responders to EGFR-TKI therapy and the factors that predict response to EGFR-TKI therapy.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs were evaluated for response after treatment, and those who responded were compared with those who did not respond.

RESULTS

Of 31 patients, 21 (67.7%) responded to EGFR-TKI therapy (the response group). There were significantly more programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1)-negative patients in the response group than in the non-response group. A significantly higher number of patients in the PDL1-positive group developed interstitial lung disease (ILD) after EGFR-TKI therapy than those in the PDL1-negative group.

CONCLUSION

EGFR-TKI therapy is likely to be non-responsive in PDL1-positive patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation-positive NSCLC. The PDL1-positive group is at a high risk of developing ILD.

Targeting Alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Lung Cancer: Insights, Challenges, and Therapeutic Strategies

Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR) is an ion-gated calcium channel that plays a significant role in various aspects of cancer pathogenesis, particularly in lung cancer. Preclinical studies have elucidated the molecular mechanism underlying α7 nAChR-associated lung cancer proliferation, chemotherapy resistance, and metastasis. Understanding and targeting this mechanism are crucial for developing therapeutic interventions aimed at disrupting α7 nAChR-mediated cancer progression and improving treatment outcomes. Drug research and discovery have determined natural compounds and synthesized chemical antagonists that specifically target α7 nAChR. However, approved α7 nAChR antagonists for clinical use are lacking, primarily due to challenges related to achieving the desired selectivity, efficacy, and safety profiles required for effective therapeutic intervention. This comprehensive review provided insights into the molecular mechanisms associated with α7 nAChR and its role in cancer progression, particularly in lung cancer. Furthermore, it presents an update on recent evidence about α7 nAChR antagonists and addresses the challenges encountered in drug research and discovery in this field.

The cytotoxicity of gefitinib on patient‑derived induced pluripotent stem cells reflects gefitinib‑induced liver injury in the clinical setting

Gefitinib is a key drug used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. Gefitinib therapy is superior to conventional chemotherapy for the progression-free survival rate of patients with EGFR mutations. However, 10-26% of patients develop grade 3 or higher hepatotoxicity during gefitinib treatment; therefore, the development of preclinical tests for hepatotoxicity prior to clinical use is desirable. The present study evaluated the use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and iPSC-derived hepatocytes (iPSC-heps), as a platform for preclinical test development. Patient-derived iPSCs were generated by reprogramming peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from two groups of gefitinib-treated patients with severe hepatotoxicity [toxicity group (T group)] or mild hepatotoxicity [no clinical toxicity group (N group)]. To examine the hepatotoxicity, the iPSCs from both T and N groups were differentiated into hepatocytes to obtain iPSC-heps. Differentiation was confirmed by measuring the expression levels of hepatocyte markers, such as albumin or α-fetoprotein, via western blotting and quantitative PCR analyses. Cytotoxicity in iPSCs and iPSC-heps after gefitinib treatment was evaluated using a lactate dehydrogenase release assay. The gefitinib-induced cytotoxicity in iPSCs from the T group was significantly higher than that from the N group, whereas there were no significant differences between the groups of iPSC-heps. These results suggested that using iPSCs in preclinical assessment may be a good indicator for the prediction of gefitinib-induced cytotoxicity in clinical use.

Valsartan prevents gefitinib-induced lung inflammation, oxidative stress, and alteration of plasma metabolites in rats

Gefitinib (GEF) is an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor, linked to higher risk of severe/fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD). This study was performed to determine the protective roles of an angiotensin-II type-1 receptor (AT1R) "valsartan (VAL)" in prevention of lung inflammation, oxidative stress and metabolites alteration induced by GEF. Four groups of male Wistar albino rats were received vehicle, VAL (30 mg/kg), GEF (30 mg/kg), or both for four weeks. Blood samples and lungs were harvested for plasma metabolites and histological analysis, respectively, and evaluation of inflammation and oxidative stress. GEF monotherapy showed a dense inflammation in lungs, and significantly increased tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.0349), interleukin-6 (P < 0.0001), chemokine ligand-3 (P = 0.0420), and interleukin-1β (P = 0.0377). GEF increased oxidative stress markers including glutathione, malondialdehyde, and catalase levels. Also, several plasma metabolites including butanoic acid, N-methylphenylethanolamine, oxalic acid, l-alanine, phosphoric acid, l-theorinine, pyroglutamic acid, and 2-bromosebacic acid were changed by GEF. The combination of VAL plus GEF reduced the inflammation and oxidative stress mediated by GEF monotherapy. In addition, the combination treatment returned plasma metabolites to the normal levels compared to GEF monotherapy. These findings revealed that VAL has a possible pulmonary protective role against pulmonary toxicity of GEF, which may lead to novel approaches for management of GEF-induced ILD.

The survival after discontinuation of EGFR-TKIs due to intolerable adverse events in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring the EGFR mutation. Patients experiencing intolerable adverse events (AEs) would discontinue EGFR-TKIs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intolerable AEs and subsequent treatment on the survival of patients who discontinued EGFR-TKIs.

PATIENTS

The data of advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs as frontline treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals from June 2014 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 2190 patients were enrolled and treated with frontline EGFR-TKIs. In August 2021, 114 (5.2%) patients experienced intolerable AEs requiring discontinuation of EGFR-TKIs. The time median of EGFR-TKIs discontinuation was 2.56 months. Age >65 years, females, body weight, and body surface area were associated with the occurrence of intolerable AEs for patients treated with afatinib. Patients experiencing skin/paronychia/mucositis and abnormal liver function test had favorable survivals results. Patients who received subsequent EGFR-TKIs treatment, experienced better progression-free survival (PFS), total PFS (from frontline line EGFR-TKIs), and overall survival (OS) compared to patients receiving chemotherapy or no treatment. Patients undergoing subsequent EGFR-TKIs had better total PFS (median, 14.9 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.013) and OS (median, 31.3 vs. 20.1 months, p = 0.001) than patients who did not discontinue because of AEs. Favorable OS was validated by propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

Patients experiencing intolerable AEs during EGFR-TKI treatment should consider switching to an alternative EGFR-TKI, which increase the survival results as compared to those patients who did not experience intolerable AEs.

Pulmonary toxicity in driver gene positive non-small cell lung cancer therapy

Molecular targeted therapy significantly improved the therapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with driver gene mutations but also with new toxicity profiles. Although most patients treated with these drugs developed relatively controllable toxicity, significant pulmonary toxicity events, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in a small proportion of patients and can lead to discontinuation or even be life-threatening. Pulmonary toxicity associated with these anti-tumor drugs is a problem that cannot be ignored in clinical practice. The prompt diagnosis of drug-related lung injury and the consequent differential diagnosis with other forms of pulmonary disease are critical in the management of pulmonary toxicity. Current knowledge of the pathophysiology and management of pulmonary toxicity associated with these targeted drugs is limited, and participants should be able to identify and respond to the development of drug-induced pulmonary toxicity. This review offers information about the potential pathogenesis, risk factors and management for the development of these events based on the available literature. This review focused on pulmonary toxicities in driver gene-positive NSCLC therapy by describing the related adverse events to promote the awareness and management of this important toxicity related to antitumor-targeted therapy.

Comparison of Different Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Poor Performance Status Patients with EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard treatments in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. However, the clinical data regarding EGFR-TKI efficacy in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. We reviewed the clinical outcomes and safety of EFGR-TKI use in patients with poor PS and identified the independent and favorable prognostic factors for progression-free survival and overall survival. We found that patients treated with 40 mg afatinib had better survival results, although only a non-significant trend toward superiority was observed in the multivariable analysis. Dose adjustment was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS. This study provided evidence of the use of EGFR-TKIs for patients with poor PS.

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the tolerability and survival outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment in patients with a performance status ≥ 2. The data for 517 patients treated with EGFR-TKIs between January 2011 and January 2018 at a regional hospital in northern Taiwan were analyzed. Clinical and pathological features were collected, and univariate as well as multivariable analyses were undertaken to identify potential prognostic factors. The overall objective response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 56.3%, 11.4 months, and 15.3 months, respectively. The mutation status (exon 19 deletion), locally advanced disease, dose adjustment, and the lack of liver and pleural metastasis were independent and favorable prognostic factors for PFS. Age < 60 years, mutation status (exon 19 deletion), dose adjustment, and lack of lung, liver, and no pleural metastasis were independent and favorable prognostic factors for OS. GFR-TKIs demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. Dose adjustment was identified as an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS, regardless of which EGFR-TKIs were used. The current research provided novel evidence of the clinical prescription of frontline EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with a PS score ≥2.

Successful treatment with afatinib following the failure of osimertinib rechallenge with osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease: A case report

Herein, we report the case of an 84-year-old woman with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation exon 19 deletion postoperative recurrent lung adenocarcinoma. Osimertinib was administered as a first-line treatment; however, she was urgently admitted to our hospital due to dyspnea on the 46th day. Chest computed tomography revealed bilateral diffuse ground-glass opacities (GGOs) suggestive of grade 3 osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). After discontinuation of osimertinib in combination with short-term corticosteroid therapy, widespread GGOs were promptly resolved. As the disease gradually deteriorated after discontinuation of osimertinib, we administered osimertinib (80 mg every other day) followed by careful observation. However, bilateral GGOs re-appeared on the 15th day, and the diagnosis of osimertinib-induced ILD was established. After the improvement in ILD following corticosteroid therapy, afatinib was administered as salvage therapy, resulting in desirable control of lung cancer without any relapse of ILD. Our results indicate that afatinib would be a promising alternative treatment option even in patients who develop osimertinib-induced ILD and experience failure of osimertinib rechallenge.

Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus-Like Eruption Induced by EGFR -Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the front-line treatment in EGFR mutation positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. Generally, they are well-tolerated but skin toxicity is common (45–100% of patients) and may adversely affect quality of life. Pathogenesis of cutaneous side effects is usually linked to EGFR expression in normal cells of the epidermis and not immune-related. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is an autoimmune disease and about 40% of SCLE cases are drug related, but no reports are available involving osimertinib. Our report depicts a drug induced-SCLE (DI-SCLE) caused by erlotinib and worsened by osimertinib. The adverse event is characterized by the absence of systemic symptoms. Diagnosis has been performed by skin biopsy and the conditions improved with systemic steroids administration and EGFR-TKIs discontinuation. The report underlines the importance of a complete dermatologic diagnosis of skin lesions induced by EGFR inhibitors, according to symptom severity and timing of improving with standard clinical management. The diagnosis of immune-related skin toxicity in this context affects the treatment and the outcome of skin toxicity and must be taken into account when planning subsequent treatments, potentially including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Molecular and Clinical Features of EGFR-TKI-Associated Lung Injury

The tyrosine kinase activity of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) plays critical roles in cell proliferation, regeneration, tumorigenesis, and anticancer resistance. Non-small-cell lung cancer patients who responded to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and obtained survival benefits had somatic EGFR mutations. EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) are usually tolerable and manageable, although serious AEs, including lung injury (specifically, interstitial lung disease (ILD), causing 58% of EGFR-TKI treatment-related deaths), occur infrequently. The etiopathogenesis of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD remains unknown. Risk factors, such as tobacco exposure, pre-existing lung fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and poor performance status, indicate that lung inflammatory circumstances may worsen with EGFR-TKI treatment because of impaired epithelial healing of lung injuries. There is limited evidence from preclinical and clinical studies of the mechanisms underlying EGFR-TKI-induced ILD in the available literature. Herein, we evaluated the relationship between EGFR-TKIs and AEs, especially ILD. Recent reports on mechanisms inducing lung injury or resistance in cytokine-rich circumstances were reviewed. We discussed the relevance of cytotoxic agents or immunotherapeutic agents in combination with EGFR-TKIs as a potential mechanism of EGFR-TKI-related lung injury and reviewed recent developments in diagnostics and therapeutics that facilitate recovery from lung injury or overcoming resistance to anti-EGFR treatment.

FDA- and EMA-Approved Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Safety, Tolerability, Plasma Concentration Monitoring, and Management

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of primary lung cancer. The discovery of several oncogenic driver mutations in patients with NSCLC has allowed the development of personalized treatments based on these specific molecular alterations, in particular in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib are TK inhibitors (TKIs) that specifically target EGFR and are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as first line treatment for sensitive EGFR-mutant patients. However, these four drugs are associated with severe adverse events (AEs) that can significantly impact patient health-related quality of life and patient monitoring. EGFR-TKIs are commonly used together with other types of medication that can substantially interact. Here, we review approaches used for the management of TKI-AEs in patients with advanced NSCLC to promote the benefits of treatments and minimize the risk of TKI treatment discontinuation. We also consider potential TKI–drug interactions and discuss the usefulness of plasma concentration monitoring TKIs based on chromatographic and mass spectrometry approaches to guide clinical decision-making. Adjusting the most appropriate therapeutic strategies and drug doses may improve the performance therapy and prognosis of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Overview of current systemic management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Front-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy is the standard of care for lung cancer patients with sensitising EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation). Several phase III studies have demonstrated the superiority of gefitinib, erlotinib (first generation of TKIs) or afatinib (second generation) to chemotherapy in progression-free survival and response rates. Drug-related toxicities, such as diarrhoea, acneiform skin rash, mucositis, and paronychia, are frequently encountered in patients who receive EGFR TKIs. Other rare side-effects, such as hepatic impairment and interstitial lung disease, should be identified early and managed carefully. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, such as G719X, S768I, and L861Q, may require special selection of EGFR TKIs. The combination of erlotinib plus bevacizumab has been accepted in certain parts of the world as an alternative front-line treatment. This review article summarizes the studies leading to the establishment of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients. The side-effect profiles of the current EGFR TKIs in these large trials are listed, and the management of uncommon EGFR mutations is discussed. Finally, the potential role of combination front-line treatment is discussed.

The effects of switching EGFR-TKI treatments for non-small cell lung cancer because of adverse events

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are used to treat patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR driver mutations. Although some patients discontinued these treatments because of adverse events, it is unclear whether switching EGFR‐TKI because of adverse events provides a benefit.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated data from 22 patients with EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC who received at least two EGFR‐TKIs that were switched because of adverse events (March 2011 to September 2017). Progression‐free survival 2 (PFS2) was defined as the time from starting of the first EGFR‐TKI treatment to disease progression during the second EGFR‐TKI treatment.

Results

Seventeen patients received gefitinib as the first EGFR‐TKI treatment, while four patients received afatinib and one patient received erlotinib. The median time to failure of the first EGFR‐TKI treatment was 1.6 months. The EGFR‐TKIs were switched because of hepatotoxicity (n = 16), interstitial lung disease (n = 3), and other reasons (n = 3). The median washout period was 1.1 months. Seventeen patients received erlotinib as the second EGFR‐TKI treatment, while three patients received gefitinib and two patients received afatinib. The median PFS for the second EGFR‐TKI treatment was 15.2 months. The median PFS2 was 17.7 months and the median overall survival was 32.8 months.

Conclusions

Switching EGFR‐TKIs because of adverse events provided a clinical benefit for patients with EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC. Appropriate judgment regarding switching from one EGFR‐TKI to another may improve the performance status and prognosis of patients with EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Dilemmas

Since the approval of the first molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, in 2001, TKIs have heralded a new era in the treatment of many cancers. Among their innumerable adverse effects, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious, presenting most frequently with dyspnea, cough, fever, and hypoxemia, and often treated with steroids. Of the 28 currently approved TKIs, 16 (57 %) are reported to induce ILD with varying frequency and/or severity. The interval from drug administration to onset of ILD varies between patients and between TKIs, with no predictable time course. Its incidence is variously reported to be approximately 1.6-4.3 % in Japanese populations and 0.3-1.0 % in non-Japanese populations. The mortality rate is in the range of 20-50 %. Available evidence (primarily following the use of erlotinib and gefitinib in Japan because of the unique susceptibility of that population) has identified a number of susceptibility and prognostic risk factors (male sex, a history of smoking, and pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis being the main ones). Although the precise mechanism is not understood, collective evidence suggests that immune factors may be involved. If TKI-induced ILD is confirmed by thorough evaluation of the patient and exclusion of other causes, management is supportive, and includes discontinuation of the culprit TKI and administration of steroids. Discontinuing the culprit TKI presents a clinical dilemma because the diagnosis of TKI-induced ILD in a patient with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis can be challenging, the patient may have TKI-responsive cancer with no suitable alternative, and switching to an alternative agent, even if available, carries the risk of the patient experiencing other toxic effects. Preliminary evidence suggests that therapy with the culprit TKI may be continued under steroid cover and/or at a reduced dose. However, this approach requires careful individualized risk-benefit analysis and further clinical experience.

Importance of Publishing Adverse Drug Reaction Case Reports: Promoting Public Health and Advancing Pharmacology and Therapeutics

This article, which encourages physicians to publish case reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), is a review of how well-documented published case reports have contributed to promoting public safety and health and thus served to advance basic pharmacology. The origin of a number of regulatory guidelines can ultimately be traced to safety concerns triggered by such reports. It illustrates how case reports of ADRs, when coupled with simultaneous monitoring of drug pharmacokinetics, have also led to further investigations resulting in major advances in pharmacology, especially pharmacogenetics, mechanisms of drug-drug interactions and modulation of drug metabolism during inflammatory co-morbidities. Published case reports differ significantly from spontaneous case reports since they enjoy quality-compliant peer review and an immediate wider visibility among the readership, triggering others to report similar cases, and ultimately leading to prescribing restrictions on or withdrawals of the drug from the market depending on the risk. Therefore, the reporter should not be discouraged by (a) the unusual or bizarre nature of the reaction; (b) the interval, however long, from commencing drug administration to the onset of the suspected reaction; (c) however well-known the drug or the period for which it has been on the market; and (d) any pressure not to publish. Case reports should be published in reputable journals that are searchable through databases such as PubMed.

Toxicity profile of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation-positive lung cancer

Recent progress in the research on the molecular biology of lung cancer revealed that the clinical response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is associated with the presence of activating EGFR mutations. Three EGFR-TKIs, namely afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib, are currently available for the treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to the dearth of published phase III trials prospectively evaluating the effects of one EGFR-TKI in comparison with another in such patients, the decision-making regarding which agent to recommend to any given patient lies with the treating physician. Given the potential long-term exposure of such patients to EGFR-TKIs, the toxicological properties of these drugs in such patients may differ from those observed in unselected patients. The aim of the present study was to provide an overview of the key adverse events (rash, diarrhea, hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease) reported for EGFR-TKIs in clinical trials including patients with advanced NSCLC.

Successful treatment with gefitinib after Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with afatinib therapy in a patient with adenocarcinoma of the lung

We report a case of a 65-year-old woman with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who experienced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) during afatinib therapy. The patient received afatinib as the first-line therapy after the confirmation of harboring an exon 19 deletion mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. The patient presented with multiple erythematous papules mainly on the body trunk and thigh 32 days after afatinib administration. Subsequently, diffuse erosions of oral mucosa and purpuric macules with flat atypical targets emerged. Skin biopsy specimen showed the histology compatible with epidermal necrosis and the patient was diagnosed as having SJS. The symptoms of SJS were recovered by systemic steroid and immunoglobulin treatment. Gefitinib was administered as the third-line therapy after the second-line therapy with carboplatin plus pemetrexed had failed. Tumor shrinkage was obtained shortly and has been maintained without the recurrence of SJS. Rechallenge of tyrosine kinase inhibitor by gefitinib could be an alternative treatment option in patients who experienced SJS by afatinib.

Study of efficacy and safety of pulsatile administration of high-dose gefitinib or erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with secondary drug resistance: A single center, single arm, phase II clinical trial

Background

The objective of the study was to observe the efficacy and safety of pulsatile administration of high‐dose gefitinib or erlotinib in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with secondary drug resistance to standard doses of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

Materials and methods

We recruited 42 NSCLC patients from our hospital, between August 2014 and December 2015, who had experienced drug resistance after one year of conventional treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. The gefitinib group (29 patients) received one dose of 1000 mg gefitinib every four days. The erlotinib group (13 patients) received one dose of 450 mg erlotinib every three days. Treatments continued until disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 or development of intolerable toxicity.

Results

Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 30 months (gefitinib vs. erlotinib: 31 vs. 24 months; P > 0.05). After high‐dose pulsatile administration, eight patients achieved a partial response (PR), 11 had stable disease (SD), and 23 had progressive disease (PD; relative risk 19.0%; disease control rate 45.2%; median PFS six months). Patients were categorized based on epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation: exon 19 (no patients achieved complete response [CR], 4 PR, 6 SD, and 17 PD) and exon 21 mutation groups (no patients achieved CR, 4 PR, 5 SD, and 6 PD).

Conclusion

High‐dose TKI pulsatile treatment is safe, efficient, and can improve prognoses for certain patients with advanced NSCLC.

Observation of hepatotoxicity during long-term gefitinib administration in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

To observe drug-induced hepatotoxicity by long-term gefitinib administration in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The data of 101 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, for which gefitinib had been used orally for 3 months or longer, were retrospectively analyzed. The median duration of gefitinib administration was 14 months (3–60 months). Forty patients (39.6%) developed abnormal hepatic function, among whom 30 patients (29.7%) had grade I hepatotoxicity, six patients (5.9%) had grade II, and four patients (4.0%) had grade III, respectively. The median time from starting gefitinib oral therapy to developing liver dysfunction was 4 months (1–23 months) for the entire cohort. The incidence of hepatotoxicity in the group with a duration of more than 14 months was much higher than that in the group with a duration of less than 14 months (52.0 vs. 27.5%, P=0.012). In thirty-two patients (32/40), abnormal liver function resolved with hepatoprotective treatment, whereas eight patients (8/40) had persistent grade I hepatotoxicity until the last follow-up. Our study showed that long-term gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity was a common adverse event, especially for the cohort with a duration of longer than 14 months. In most patients with hepatotoxicity, normal liver function was restored and discontinuation of gefitinib was not necessary.

Successful treatment with alectinib after crizotinib-induced interstitial lung disease

We herein report a case of a 46-year-old woman with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who received the ALK inhibitor crizotinib as second-line therapy. On the 47th day following crizotinib initiation, a chest computed tomography scan revealed ground-glass opacities with a clinical manifestation of desaturation, although a partial response to treatment was detected. The diagnosis of crizotinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) was confirmed, and crizotinib was discontinued, followed by the initiation of corticosteroid therapy. After improvement of ILD with corticosteroid therapy, alectinib was administered as salvage therapy, resulting in tumor shrinkage without any recurrence of ILD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of successful alectinib treatment following crizotinib-induced ILD. Our results indicate that alectinib could be a promising alternative treatment option in patients with crizotinib-induced ILD.

Icotinib: activity and clinical application in Chinese patients with lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Icotinib (BPI-2009H, Conmana) is a novel oral quinazoline compound that has proven survival benefit in Chinese patients with lung cancer, for which several therapies are currently available often with unsatisfactory results. Icotinib is the first self-developed small molecular drug in China for targeted therapy of lung cancer.

AREAS COVERED

The authors' experience in the clinical application of icotinib is reviewed in combination with related publications in the literature. Antitumor activities were observed in non-small-cell lung cancer and others in several recent studies. On 7 June 2011, icotinib was approved by the State Food and Drug Administration of China for the treatment of local advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer based on the results of a nationwide, of 27 centers, randomized, double-blind, double-modulated, parallel-controlled, Phase III trial with single agent icotinib in lung cancer patients after failure of chemotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Icotinib is a generic drug. Compared to the other two commercially available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, icotinib is similar to them in chemical structure, mechanism of activity and therapeutic effects but less expensive. Better safety as well as a wider therapeutic window has also been proven in several Chinese studies. Future studies on cost effectiveness are warranted.

Hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: clinical and regulatory perspectives

The introduction of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical oncology has transformed the treatment of certain forms of cancers. As of 31 March 2013, 18 such agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 15 of these also by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and a large number of others are in development or under regulatory review. Unexpectedly, however, their use has been found to be associated with serious toxic effects on a number of vital organs including the liver. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity has resulted in withdrawal from the market of many widely used drugs and is a major public health issue that continues to concern all the stakeholders. This review focuses on hepatotoxic potential of TKIs. The majority of TKIs approved to date are reported to induce hepatic injury. Five of these (lapatinib, pazopanib, ponatinib, regorafenib and sunitinib) are sufficiently potent in this respect as to require a boxed label warning. Onset of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity is usually within the first 2 months of initiating treatment, but may be delayed, and is usually reversible. Fatality from TKI-induced hepatotoxicity is uncommon compared to hepatotoxic drugs in other classes but may lead to long-term consequences such as cirrhosis. Patients should be carefully monitored for TKI-induced hepatotoxicity, the management of which requires individually tailored reappraisal of the risk/benefit. The risk is usually manageable by dose adjustment or a switch to a suitable alternative TKI. Confirmation of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity can present challenges in the presence of hepatic metastasis and potential drug interactions. Its diagnosis in a patient with TKI-sensitive cancer requires great care if therapy with the TKI suspected to be causal is to be modified or interrupted as a result. Post-marketing experience with drugs such as imatinib, lapatinib and sorafenib suggests that the hepatotoxic safety of all the TKIs requires diligent surveillance.