Comparison of cardiotoxicity induced by alectinib, apatinib, lenvatinib and anlotinib in zebrafish embryos

Four tyrosine kinase inhibitors, alectinib, apatinib, lenvatinib and anlotinib, have been shown to be effective in the treatment of clinical tumors, but their cardiac risks have also raised concerns. In this study, zebrafish embryos at 6 h post fertilization (hpf) were exposed to the four drugs at concentrations of 0.05-0.2 mg/L until 72 hpf, and then the development of these embryos was quantified, including heart rate, body length, yolk sac area, pericardial area, distance between venous sinus and balloon arteriosus (SV-BA), separation of cardiac myocytes and endocardium, gene expression, vascular development and oxidative stress. At the same exposure concentrations, alectinib and apatinib had little effect on the cardiac development of zebrafish embryos, while lenvatinib and anlotinib could induce significant cardiotoxicity and developmental toxicity, including shortened of body length, delayed absorption of yolk sac, pericardial edema, prolonged SV-BA distance, separation of cardiomyocytes and endocardial cells, and downregulation of key genes for heart development. Heart rate decreased in all four drug treatment groups. In terms of vascular development, alectinib and apatinib did not inhibit the growth of embryonic intersegmental vessels (ISVs) and retinal vessels, while lenvatinib and anlotinib caused serious vascular toxicity, and the inhibition of anlotinib in vascular development was more obvious. Besides, the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the lenvatinib and anlotinib treatment groups was significantly increased. Our results provide reference for comparing the cardiotoxicity of the four drugs.

ALK Rearrangement Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma in Pregnancy Treated With Alectinib: A Case Report

There are few reported cases of ALK gene rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during pregnancy. There is a lack of information on the safety of ALK inhibitors in pregnant patients. We present a 25-year-old African American woman who was diagnosed with metastatic ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma at 15 weeks of gestation. Treatment with alectinib was initiated at 18 weeks' gestation with resultant radiological treatment response. The patient did not experience any adverse effects from alectinib during her pregnancy. An elective induction of labor at 39 weeks resulted in an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. This case adds to available data and provides insight on the safety of using alectinib in a pregnant, ALK+ NSCLC patient, allowing the patient to continue her pregnancy to term while treating advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Escalated Alectinib in Patients With Metastatic ALK-Positive NSCLC and Central Nervous System Relapse on Standard-Dose Alectinib

Introduction

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases remain a common challenge in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. We previously reported reinduction of CNS responses using dose-intensified alectinib in two patients with CNS progression on standard-dose alectinib. Nevertheless, this strategy has not been assessed in larger cohorts.

Methods

Patients were eligible for this retrospective study if they had metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC with CNS relapse on alectinib 600 mg twice daily dosing and subsequently received escalated dosing (900 mg twice daily) of alectinib. CNS efficacy was assessed per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

Results

Among 27 patients, median duration of dose-escalated alectinib was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8-10.9), with median overall time-to-progression (TTP) of 7.1 months (95% CI: 4.4-9.6). Among 25 CNS response-assessable patients, CNS objective response rate was 12.0% (95% CI: 2.5-31.2) and CNS disease control rate was 92.0% (95% CI: 74.0-99.0), with median CNS duration of disease control of 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.4-8.3) and median CNS TTP of 7.1 months (95% CI: 4.4-9.6). Among four patients with measurable CNS disease at baseline, three experienced a best intracranial response of stable disease and one experienced intracranial partial response with CNS TTP ranging from 4.1 to 7.7 months. No patient required drug discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse event or experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusions

Dose-intensified alectinib was found to have tolerability and activity in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who experienced CNS relapse on standard-dose alectinib and represents one clinically viable strategy for this population.

Concomitant double-fusion of PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK reveals favorable alectinib sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion is a classic driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, ALK double-fusion variants in NSCLC have rarely been reported. In this study, we reported a case with extremely uncommon ALK double-fusion variants. A 32-year-old female diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma, who had developed multiple intrapulmonary and brain metastases, experienced worsening of her condition despite undergoing prior chemotherapy. Subsequent testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) detected the presence of PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK double-fusion. The prescription of alectinib revealed potent efficacy and resulted in an increase in the survival rate. This case presented two uncommon and concomitant ALK fusion partners in NSCLC; more importantly, the INPP5D-ALK subtype has not been reported, therefore this study broadens the spectrum of ALK double-fusion variants and provides insight into the use of ALK inhibitors for the treatment of NSCLC in patients with double ALK fusions.

Lorlatinib After Alectinib-Induced Pneumonitis: A Case Report

ALK gene rearrangements are detected in approximately 3% to 5% of NSCLC. ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as third-generation lorlatinib, have exhibited remarkable efficacy in ALK-rearranged NSCLC; however, they have been associated with a low incidence of treatment-limiting and potentially fatal drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). There is concern that this may represent a class effect, a theory that is supported by a number of case reports. Because of clinical trial exclusion criteria, there are limited prospective data to guide decision-making after ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors-induced ILD. A systematic review of the literature was conducted and only identified four reported cases of lorlatinib safety in this context. Here, we report the successful sequencing of lorlatinib in a patient who discontinued alectinib secondary to grade 3 drug-induced ILD.

Alectinib continuation beyond progression in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer with alectinib-refractory

Background

Alectinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI), has demonstrated noteworthy efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, 53.3% of untreated patients receiving first-line treatment with alectinib developed resistance to alectinib. However, despite the widespread use of alectinib, studies on the efficacy and safety of continuing alectinib with other necessary therapies after progression of alectinib and possible population of benefit are still limited.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included fifteen patients with ALK-positive NSCLC from nine institutions in China who experienced disease progression after first- or second-line treatment and continued to receive alectinib treatment between 2019 and 2022. This study aimed to evaluate the median progression-free survival (mPFS), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs) of continuing alectinib combined with other therapies after the emergence of drug resistance.

Results

Among fifteen patients eligible for this study, all patients started continuing treatment with alectinib after oligoprogression or central nervous system (CNS) progression. The mPFS for the whole cohort receiving continuing alectinib with other necessary therapies was 8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4 to not applicable (NA)], with an ORR of 46.7%. The mOS was not reached. During continuing alectinib treatment, only one patient experienced grade 2 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT).

Conclusions

The continuation of alectinib treatment combined with other necessary therapies demonstrates favorable response and safety in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who experienced oligoprogression or CNS progression following alectinib in first- or second-line therapy. Instead of immediately switching to another ALK-TKI, continuing alectinib combined with other necessary therapies may offer greater survival benefits to the patients.

Coexistence of a novel SRBD1-ALK, ALK-CACNA1D double-fusion in a lung adenocarcinoma patient and response to alectinib: A case report

A Chinese male patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma experienced disease progression one and a half years after receiving first-line immunochemotherapy. The second biopsy was performed and tissue immunohistochemistry revealed Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, so he began to receive Alectinib treatment. Then the next generation sequencing found double fusion variants of S1 RNA binding domain 1 (SRBD1)- ALK and ALK- Calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 D (CACNA1D). After continuous Alectinib treatment for 7 months, almost complete response (CR) was achieved. The patient is currently taking Alectinib for 13 months, the condition is stable, and is waiting for the next cycle of efficacy evaluation.

Determination of alectinib and its active metabolite in plasma by pipette-tip solid-phase extraction using porous polydopamine graphene oxide adsorbent coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection

Alectinib is known as an effective targeted drug, which has excellent therapeutic effect on non-small cell lung cancer and can significantly prolong the survival of patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary due to the photo-instability of alectinib and the individual differences in patients. In this work, a porous polydopamine graphene oxide composite (PDAG) was prepared by a simple surface modification method. A PDAG-based pipette-tip solid-phase extraction (PT-SPE) coupled with HPLC-UV detection was proposed for the separation and detection of alectinib and its active metabolite M4 in plasma. The method was methodologically validated and showed good linearity in the range of 50-5000 ng mL-1 (R2 > 0.9995). The limit of detection (LOD) was 4.8 ng mL-1 and 3.9 ng mL-1 for alectinib and M4, respectively, and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 16.1 ng mL-1 and 13.1 ng mL-1, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day precision expressed by coefficient of variation was less than 4.8 %. The recovery of this method ranged from 84.9 % to 103.5 % with a standard deviation of less than 4.3 %. In conclusion, the established method is accurate, stable and inexpensive, and can be used to monitor the levels of alectinib and M4 in plasma, which provide technical and data support for exploring optimal individualized remedial dosing regimens.

Brigatinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Rearrangement: Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Alectinib and brigatinib are second-generation anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinases (ALKs) that are widely used as first-line therapy for treating ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the lack of a head-to-head comparison of these drugs as first-line therapies, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of alectinib and brigatinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who received alectinib or brigatinib as the first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were evaluated for clinical outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), intracranial ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients who received either alectinib or brigatinib as a first-line treatment, 176 received alectinib and 32 received brigatinib. At the data cutoff point, the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 18.3) in the brigatinib group and 27.5 months (95% CI, 24.6 to 30.4) in the alectinib group. The ORR was 92.5% with alectinib and 93.8% for brigatinib. The intracranial ORR rates were 92.7% (38/41) and 100% (10/10), respectively. The rate of PFS at 12 months was comparable between the alectinib group and the brigatinib groups (84.4% vs. 84.1%, p=0.64), and the median TTNT, PFS, and OS were not reached in either group. Treatment-related adverse events were usually mild, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was rare (alectinib 4.5% vs. brigatinib 6.25%).

CONCLUSION

Alectinib and brigatinib had similar clinical benefits when used as the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement in the real world.

[Successful bridging therapy with alectinib prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation for refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma]

Although alectinib is effective for relapsed or refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and has a favorable safety profile, its role as a bridging therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and the role of allo-HSCT itself in this setting are unknown. A 35-year-old man with ALK-positive ALCL experienced relapse after first-line therapy with CHOP. Brentuximab vedotin led to partial response and high-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous HSCT was performed. However, disease progressed 15 months after transplantation, and alectinib was initiated. Complete response (CR) was achieved after three months of treatment, and alectinib was continued for 5 months. After cessation of alectinib, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA 1-locus mismatched unrelated donor was performed after conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, and total body irradiation. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and short-term methotrexate. The post-transplant course was unremarkable except for grade I acute GVHD. The lymphoma has not recurred for 2 years after allo-HSCT without resuming alectinib. The clinical course of our case suggests that alectinib bridging therapy and allo-HSCT are effective in relapsed/refractory ALK-positive ALCL.

A novel intergenic (between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1)-ALK fusion responds to alectinib in lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The wide implementation of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the identification of a greater number of uncommon partners of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion. The clinical significance of the intergenic-ALK fusion was deemed limited due to the ambiguous functional partner. Herein, we reported a case of lung adenocarcinoma harboring a novel intergenic (between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1)-ALK fusion which is sensitive to alectinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hematoxylin-eosin staining (HE), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on a 168-gene panel were performed on the biopsy sample.

RESULTS

A 50-year-old Chinese male patient diagnosed with stage IVA adenocarcinoma of the upper lobe of the right lung. A novel ALK fusion, resulting from the intergenic region between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1 fusing with intron 19 of ALK, was unveiled by NGS analysis. Furthermore, positive expression of ALK was confirmed through IHC analysis. The patient was administered alectinib at a dose of 600 mg twice daily as first-line therapy, and partial response was assessed. To date, the progression-free survival (PFS) has exceeded 14 months without any observed serious toxicities.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this represents the inaugural report of a patient harboring a novel intergenic-ALK fusion with a breakpoint situated between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1, who exhibited favorable response to alectinib. This case warrants further investigation and offers valuable insights into the response of this novel intergenic-ALK fusion to alectinib.

Left total pneumonectomy performed after alectinib treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung adenocarcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement generates an oncogenic ALK tyrosine kinase that activates numerous downstream signaling pathways, leading to increased cell proliferation and survival. About 5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are being diagnosed with tumor harboring ALK-positive. ALK rearrangement is an important molecular target for the treatment of NSCLC, and alectinib is a potent and highly selective second-generation ALK inhibitor. Alectinib as a neoadjuvant therapy has been reported in previous studies. However, cases of patients undergoing left total pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant therapy are rare.

CASE DESCRIPTION

In this report, a 52-year-old Asian woman's chest computed tomography (CT) showed mass shadows in the left lung. Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-ALK (EML4-ALK) fusion variant was detected by next-generation sequencing. We administered the targeted drug alectinib at 600 mg twice daily for two and a half months. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT examination showed that the left lung mass and lymph nodes were significantly reduced. The tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage was reduced from cT4N2M0, IIIb to ycT2aN0M0, IB. Then she underwent thoracoscopic transthoracotomy of the left total lung. Oral alectinib therapy was continued after surgery, and the follow-up duration was one year.

CONCLUSIONS

This case indicates that alectinib is feasible and has a good safety profile as a neoadjuvant therapy for ALK-positive NSCLC. But further research is needed to determine how long the treatment should last for patients to get the most benefit. There is also the problem of pulmonary fibrosis in the process of alectinib neoadjuvant therapy, which needs to be solved urgently.

Update of Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy for ALK+ Inflammation Myofibroblastic Tumor

OPINION STATEMENT: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), characterized by intermediate malignancy and a propensity for recurrence, has presented a formidable clinical challenge in diagnosis and treatment. Its pathological characteristics may resemble other neoplasms or reactive lesions, and the treatment was limited, taking chemotherapies as the only option for those inoperable. However, discovering anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein expression in approximately 50% of IMT cases has shed light on a new diagnostic approach and application of targeted therapies. With the previous success of combating ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancers with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), crizotinib, a first-generation ALK-TKI, was officially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020, to treat unresectable ALK+ IMT. After the approval of crizotinib, other ALK-TKIs, such as ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib, have proven their efficacy on ALK+ IMT with sporadic case reports. The sequential treatments of targeted therapies in may provide the insight into the choice of ALK-TKIs in different lines of treatment for unresectable ALK+ IMT.

Spontaneous Bilateral Chylothorax Development During Alectinib Therapy for ALK-Rearranged NSCLC-A Case Report

The emergence of spontaneous nonmalignant chylous effusions during treatment with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been previously described; however, there have been no prior reports for alectinib. Herein, we report a case of symptomatic bilateral chylothorax during alectinib therapy in a patient with ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. Although immediate control of symptoms was achieved by placement of bilateral tunneled pleural catheters, the chylothorax ultimately resolved only after alectinib discontinuation and transition to an alternative TKI. This case adds alectinib to the growing list of TKIs that may be associated with the rare emergence of spontaneous, nonmalignant chylous effusions.

Brigatinib Versus Alectinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC After Disease Progression on Crizotinib: Results of Phase 3 ALTA-3 Trial

INTRODUCTION

This open-label, phase 3 trial (ALTA-3; NCT03596866) compared efficacy and safety of brigatinib versus alectinib for ALK+ NSCLC after disease progression on crizotinib.

METHODS

Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC that progressed on crizotinib were randomized 1:1 to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in, 90 mg) or alectinib 600 mg twice daily, aiming to test superiority. The primary end point was blinded independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Interim analysis for efficacy and futility was planned at approximately 70% of 164 expected PFS events.

RESULTS

The population (N = 248; brigatinib, n = 125; alectinib, n = 123) was notable for long median duration of prior crizotinib (16.0-16.8 mo) and low rate of ALK fusion in baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; 78 of 232 [34%]). Median blinded independent review committee-assessed PFS was 19.3 months with brigatinib and 19.2 months with alectinib (hazard ratio = 0.97 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.42], p = 0.8672]). The study met futility criterion. Overall survival was immature (41 events [17%]). Exploratory analyses pooled across the treatment groups revealed median PFS of 11.1 versus 22.5 months in patients with versus without ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion at baseline (hazard ratio: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.71]). Treatment-related adverse events in more than 30% of patients (brigatinib, alectinib) were elevated levels of blood creatine phosphokinase (70%, 29%), aspartate aminotransferase (53%, 38%), and alanine aminotransferase (40%, 36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Brigatinib was not superior to alectinib for PFS in crizotinib-pretreated ALK+ NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the well-established and unique profiles of each drug. The low proportion of patients with ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion may account for prolonged PFS with both drugs in ALTA-3.

Metastasis-directed radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer failured under TKI: A case report and literature review

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have revolutionized the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALKr-NSCLC), radiotherapy (RT) still plays an essential role for treatment of both intracranial and extracranial metastases, particularly for patients experienced a TKI-failure. We reported the case of a 38-year-old woman with metastatic ALKr-NSCLC who received whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) for multiple brain metastases (BMs), initially. After RT, alectinib was initiated and the patient had a good clinico-radiological response in both intracranial and extracranial regions. However, intracranial progression was developed and, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was applied to the four progressed BMs. Two months after SRS, all BMs disappeared. While patient was using alectinib, a recurrent lung lesion, a hilar lymph node and bone metastasis were detected. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was applied to all metastatic sites and, alectinib was continued again. Three months after SBRT, a complete response was obtained. She has been alive with the initial systemic therapy agent for more than 4years without evidence of neither disease nor toxicity. SRS/SBRT may eradicate the TKI-resistant tumoral clones and it may prevent switching the systemic therapy, even if there is a failure.

Serum Albumin Affects the Time-to-treatment Failure of Alectinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Alectinib is recommended for anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We have experienced early alectinib discontinuation due to disease progression and adverse effects in real world. Because alectinib has a high protein-binding rate of >99%, low serum albumin may increase the concentration of free drug and affect efficacy and adverse events. However, no association between serum albumin and the clinical impact of alectinib has been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of serum albumin on time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in alectinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients who were admitted to four hospitals (National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Otaru General Hospital) between October 2014 and September 2020 were retrospectively evaluated to identify those treated with alectinib.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that the risk of discontinuation was significantly higher with serum albumin <3.6 g/dl compared to ≥3.6 g/dl at the start of alectinib administration (hazard ratio=3.00; 95% confidence interval=1.36-6.66; p<0.01). On Kaplan-Meier curves, TTF for serum albumin <3.6 was significantly shorter than that for ≥3.6. (median TTF: 12.1 months vs. not reach, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report that serum albumin <3.6 g/dl at alectinib induction is associated with poor TTF. Low serum albumin is a poor prognostic factor in cancer patients. Thus, serum albumin levels must be measured before treatment.

Photophysical Exploration of Alectinib and Rilpivirine: Insights from Theory and Experiment

Due to the excellent characteristics of fluorescence-based imaging, such as non-invasive detection of biomarkers in vitro and in vivo with high sensitivity, good spatio-temporal resolution and fast response times, it has shown significant prospects in various applications. Compounds with both biological activities and fluorescent properties have the potential for integrated diagnosis and treatment application. Alectinib and Rilpivirine are two excellent drugs on sale that represent a clinically approved targeted therapy for ALK-rearranged NSCLC and have exhibited more favorable safety and tolerance profiles in Phase III clinical trials, ECHO and THRIVE, respectively. The optical properties of these two drugs, Alectinib and Rilpivirine, were deeply explored, firstly through the simulation of molecular structures, electrostatic potential, OPA/TPA and emission spectral properties and experiments on UV-vis spectra, fluorescence and cell imaging. It was found that Alectinib exhibited 7.8% of fluorescence quantum yield at the 450 nm excited wavelength, due to a larger electronic transition dipole moment (8.41 Debye), bigger charge transition quantity (0.682 e) and smaller reorganization energy (2821.6 cm-1). The stronger UV-vis spectra of Rilpivirine were due to a larger electron-hole overlap index (Sr: 0.733) and were also seen in CDD plots. Furthermore, Alectinib possessed obvious active two-photon absorption properties (δmaxTPA* ϕ = 201.75 GM), which have potential TPA imaging applications in bio-systems. Lastly, Alectinib and Rilpivirine displayed green fluorescence in HeLa cells, suggesting the potential ability for biological imaging. Investigation using theoretical and experimental methods is certainly encouraged, given the particular significance of developing integrated diagnosis and treatment.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant alectinib in unresectable anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive non-small cell lung cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

The development of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has remarkably improved the prognosis of patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Alectinib, the second-generation ALK-TKI, has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement. Neoadjuvant therapy can achieve tumor downstaging and eradicate occult lesions in patients with potentially resectable disease. Whether neoadjuvant alectinib can be a conversion therapy in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients remains unclear.

CASE SUMMARY

A 41-year-old man was pathologically diagnosed with locally advanced ALK-positive stage IIIB NSCLC. Alectinib was prescribed to induce tumor downstaging and facilitate the subsequent surgical resection. The tumor was successfully downstaged and pathological complete response was achieved. Left upper lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed after tumor downstaging. The patient has continued to receive alectinib as adjuvant therapy during postoperative follow-up with a recurrence-free survival of 29 mo as of writing this report.

CONCLUSION

This case sheds light on the feasibility and safety of alectinib as a neoadjuvant treatment for stage IIIB NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement. Its efficacy needs to be validated in prospective clinical trials.

Effects of drug-drug interactions and CYP3A4 variants on alectinib metabolism

In this study, the effects of 17 CYP3A4 variants and drug-drug interactions (DDI) with its mechanism on alectinib metabolism were investigated. In vitro incubation systems of rat liver microsomes (RLM), human liver microsomes (HLM) and recombinant human CYP3A4 variants were established. The formers were used to screen potential drugs that inhibited alectinib metabolism and study the underlying mechanism, and the latter was used to determine the dynamic characteristics of CYP3A4 variants. Alectinib and its main metabolite M4 were quantitatively determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The results showed that compared with CYP3A4.1, only CYP3A4.29 showed higher catalytic activity, while the catalytic activity of CYP3A4.4, .7, .8, .12, .14, .16, .17, .18, .19, .20, .23, and .24 decreased significantly. Among them, the catalytic activity of CYP3A4.20 is the lowest, only 2.63% of that of CYP3A4.1. Based on the RLM incubation system in vitro, 81 drugs that may be combined with alectinib were screened, among which 18 drugs had an inhibition rate higher than 80%. In addition, nicardipine had an inhibition rate of 95.09% with a half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 3.54 ± 0.96 μM in RLM and 1.52 ± 0.038 μM in HLM, respectively. There was a mixture of non-competitive and anti-competitive inhibition of alectinib metabolism in both RLM and HLM. In vivo experiments of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, compared with the control group (30 mg/kg alectinib alone), the AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Tmax and Cmax of alectinib administered in combination with 6 mg/kg nicardipine were significantly increased in the experimental group. In conclusion, the metabolism of alectinib was affected by polymorphisms of the CYP3A4 gene and nicardipine. This study provides reference data for clinical individualized administration of alectinib in the future.

Analysis of Serious Weight Gain in Patients Using Alectinib for ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is a standard-of-care treatment for metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. Weight gain is an unexplored side effect reported in approximately 10%. To prevent or intervene alectinib-induced weight gain, more insight in its extent and etiology is needed.

METHODS

Change in body composition was analyzed in a prospective series of 46 patients with ALK+ NSCLC, treated with alectinib. Waist circumference, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and skeletal muscle were quantified using sliceOmatic software on computed tomography images at baseline, 3 months (3M), and 1 year (1Y). To investigate an exposure-toxicity relationship, alectinib plasma concentrations were quantified. Four patients with more than 10 kg weight gain were referred to Erasmus MC Obesity Center CGG for in-depth analysis (e.g., assessments of appetite, dietary habits, other lifestyle, medical and psychosocial factors, and extensive metabolic and endocrine assessments, including resting energy expenditure).

RESULTS

Mean increase in waist circumference was 9 cm (9.7%, p < 0.001) in 1Y with a 40% increase in abdominal obesity (p = 0.014). VAT increased to 10.8 cm2 (15.0%, p = 0.003) in 3M and 35.7 cm2 (39.0%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. SAT increased to 18.8 cm2 (12.4%, p < 0.001) in 3M and 45.4 cm2 (33.3%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. The incidence of sarcopenic obesity increased from 23.7% to 47.4% during 1Y of treatment. Baseline waist circumference was a positive predictor of increase in VAT (p = 0.037). No exposure-toxicity relationship was found. In-depth analysis (n = 4) revealed increased appetite in two patients and metabolic syndrome in all four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Alectinib may cause relevant increased sarcopenic abdominal obesity, with increases of both VAT and SAT, quickly after initiation. This may lead to many serious metabolic, physical, and mental disturbances in long-surviving patients.

Efficacy and Tolerability of ALK/MET Combinations in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancer With Acquired MET Amplification: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

MET amplification is a potentially actionable resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancer. Studies describing treatment outcomes of this molecular subgroup are lacking.

Methods

We assembled a cohort of patients with ALK+ lung cancer and acquired MET amplification (identified by tissue or plasma) who received regimens targeting both ALK and MET. Efficacy and safety were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively.

Results

A total of 12 patients were included in the series. MET amplification was detected after a median of 1.5 (range 1-5) lines of therapy. Four distinct regimens were implemented to address MET amplification: crizotinib (n = 2), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = 6), alectinib plus capmatinib (n = 3), and alectinib plus crizotinib (n = 1). Partial responses were observed in five (42%) of 12 patients, including patients who received crizotinib (n = one of two), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = three of six), and alectinib plus capmatinib (n = one of three). Primary progression was observed in four patients (33%). Grades 1 to 2 peripheral edema, occurring in seven (58%) patients, was found with both crizotinib and capmatinib. One patient required dose reduction of capmatinib plus alectinib for persistent grade 2 edema. Across the regimens, one patient discontinued therapy for toxicity, specifically neurocognitive toxicity from lorlatinib plus crizotinib. At progression on ALK+ MET therapy, potential resistance mechanisms included MET copy number changes and ALK kinase domain mutations.

Conclusions

Combined ALK and MET inhibition is associated with moderate antitumor activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with concurrent MET amplification. Prospective studies are indicated to confirm activity and identify individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment.

Successful Treatment of ALK-Positive Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung With Sequential ALK Inhibitors: A Case Report

ALK-positive large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an exceptionally rare form of lung cancer. The efficacy of ALK inhibitors in treating ALK-positive LCNEC remains unclear. Here, we report a case of ALK-positive LCNEC of the lung, which revealed a sustained clinical benefit (24+ mo of overall survival) after treatment with sequential ALK inhibitors and local therapies. This remarkable improvement in survival underscores the importance of testing metastatic LCNEC for biomarkers, such as ALK rearrangement, using immunohistochemistry or next-generation sequencing, especially in younger patients.

Evaluation of Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors According to Body Mass Index in ALK Rearranged NSCLC Patients-A Retrospective Observational Study

No evidence exists as to whether body mass index (BMI) impairs clinical outcomes from ALK inhibitors (ALKi) in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Retrospective data of patients affected by metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with ALKi were collected. We divided patients into "low- BMI" (≤25 kg/m²) and "high- BMI" (>25 kg/m²) categories and correlated them with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We included 40 patients treated with ALKi. We observed a 3-year OS of 81.5% in high-BMI vs. 49.6% in low-BMI categories (p = 0.049); the 3-year first-line PFS was superior in high-BMI vs. low-BMI patients (47% vs. 19%, p = 0.019). As expected, patients treated with Alectinib had a 55.6% 3-year PFS vs. 7.1% for others treated with ALKi (p = 0.025). High-BMI was associated with a 100% 3-year PFS rate vs. 25.4% in low-BMI Alectinib patients (p = 0.03). BMI was independently correlated with first-line PFS and OS at multivariate analysis with PS (HR 0.39, CI 95% 0.16-0.96, p = 0.042; HR 0.18, CI 95% 0.05-0.61, p = 0.006). High-BMI was associated with higher efficacy in ALK-rearranged patients. These results are particularly exciting for Alectinib and could be correlated to mechanisms that should be investigated in subsequent prospective studies.

Influence of Food With Different Fat Concentrations on Alectinib Exposure: A Randomized Crossover Pharmacokinetic Trial

BACKGROUND

Alectinib is the keystone treatment in advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An exposure-response threshold of 435 ng/mL has recently been established, albeit 37% of patients do not reach this threshold. Alectinib is orally administered, and absorption is largely influenced by food. Hence, further investigation into this relationship is needed to optimize its bioavailability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized 3-period crossover clinical study in ALK+ NSCLC, alectinib exposure was compared among patients with different diets. Every 7 days, the first alectinib dose was taken with either a continental breakfast, 250-g of low-fat yogurt, or a self-chosen lunch, and the second dose was taken with a self-chosen dinner. Sampling for alectinib exposure (Ctrough) was performed at day 8, just prior to alectinib intake, and the relative difference in Ctrough was compared.

RESULTS

In 20 evaluable patients, the mean Ctrough was 14% (95% CI, -23% to -5%; P=.009) and 20% (95% CI, -25% to -14%; P<.001) lower when taken with low-fat yogurt compared with a continental breakfast and a self-chosen lunch, respectively. Administration with a self-chosen lunch did not change exposure compared with a continental breakfast (+7%; 95% CI, -2% to +17%; P=.243). In the low-fat yogurt period, 35% of patients did not reach the threshold versus 5% with the other meals (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and physicians should be warned for a detrimental food-drug interaction when alectinib is taken with low-fat yogurt, because it results in a clinically relevant lower alectinib exposure. Intake with a self-chosen lunch did not change drug exposure and could be a safe and patient-friendly alternative.

Association of PD-L1 expression with efficacy of alectinib in advanced NSCLC patients with ALK fusion

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was found to be a biomarker of inferior efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether PD-L1 expression could also serve as a similar biomarker in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive patients, especially for those treated with front-line alectinib, remains unclear. The aim of the study is to investigate the association of PD-L1 expression and efficacy of alectinib in this setting.

METHODS

From January 2018 to March 2020, 225 patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer were consecutively collected at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University. Baseline PD-L1 expression was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 56 patients of advanced ALK-rearranged lung cancer who received front-line alectinib.

RESULTS

Among the 56 eligible patients, 30 (53.6%) were PD-L1 expression negative, 19 (33.9%) patients had TPS 1%-49% and 7 (12.5%) had TPS ≥ 50%.We found no statistically significant associations between PD-L1 positivity and objective response rate (ORR, 90.0% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.274) or progression-free survival (PFS, not reached vs. not reached, HR: 0.98, 95 %CI: 0.37-2.61, p = 0.97) in patients treated with alectinib. Meanwhile, patients with PD-L1 high expression (TPS ≥ 50%) had a trend of longer PFS (not reached vs. not reached, p = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression might not serve as a predict biomarker for the efficacy of front-line alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

An update on Alectinib: a first line treatment for ALK-positive advanced lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is a second-generation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is able to induce significant and durable CNS responses. However, long-term use of alectinib has been clinically reported to cause some serious and even life-threatening adverse events. There are currently no effective interventions for its adverse events, and this undoubtedly leads to delays in patient treatment and limits its long-term clinical use.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the clinical trials conducted so far, we summarize the efficacy and adverse events that occurred, especially those related to cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and respiratory disorders. The factors that may influence alectinib selection are also described. Findings are based on a PubMed literature search of clinical and basic science research papers spanning 1998-2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The significant prolongation of patient survival compared with first-generation ALK inhibitor suggests its potential as a first-line treatment for the NSCLC, but the severe adverse events of alectinib limit its long-term clinical use. Future research should focus on the exact mechanisms of these toxicities, how to alleviate the adverse events caused by alectinib clinically, and the development of next-generation drugs with reduced toxicities.

Drug interactions between ALK inhibitors and warfarin with concurrent use of bucolome: a case report

BACKGROUND

Alectinib, crizotinib, and ceritinib, are anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) that exhibit high protein binding, and their metabolism is associated with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes 2C9 or 3A4. The plasma protein binding rate of warfarin, which is used to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism, is also high. Warfarin is a racemate of S-warfarin and R-warfarin, which are metabolized by CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, respectively. Reports on the drug interactions between each of the above-mentioned ALK-TKIs and warfarin with concurrent use of bucolome are currently lacking.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a patient receiving warfarin and bucolome, whose international normalized ratio (INR) increased after sequential treatment with alectinib, crizotinib, and ceritinib. The patient was a 61-year-old man with a history of aortic valve regurgitation, who was receiving warfarin treatment following aortic valve replacement. Bucolome, which can enhance the effect of warfarin, was also used simultaneously. The patient was diagnosed with primary lung adenocarcinoma, and ALK rearrangement was detected during second-line chemotherapy. After progression of the disease with chemotherapy, sequential treatment with alectinib, crizotinib, and ceritinib was initiated. Pretreatment INR values were in the therapeutic range (target INR of 2-3) but increased to supratherapeutic levels each time after initiation of alectinib, crizotinib, or ceritinib treatment. Adjustment of warfarin dose or discontinuation of bucolome were necessary to maintain the therapeutic INR range. There were no serious bleeding events or substantial changes in dietary intake. Displacement of plasma protein binding or competitive inhibition of metabolism by alectinib, crizotinib, and ceritinib could increase the plasma concentration of the unbound form of warfarin, resulting in high INR values. In addition, alectinib, crizotinib, and ceritinib might cause displacement of bucolome from plasma proteins, followed by displacement of warfarin or inhibition of warfarin metabolism caused by the unbound form of bucolome.

CONCLUSIONS

Close monitoring of INR and adjustment of warfarin dosage are needed during treatment with alectinib, crizotinib, or ceritinib in patients who receive warfarin with concurrent use of bucolome.

The safety and efficacy for the treatment of alectinib in a women with ALK-positive lung cancer delivered a healthy male neonate throughout Pregnancy: A case report

The incidence of lung cancer in pregnancy is increasing because of an increase in cigarette smoking among young women, air pollution, and advanced maternal age. This is the third case report of a woman with metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung adenocarcinoma treated with alectinib during pregnancy. The patient was diagnosed with lung cancer at 26 weeks' gestation. Her condition rapidly progressed to disseminated intravascular coagulation accompanied by hypoxemia. After 5 days of treatment with alectinib 600 mg twice daily and best supportive care, the patient's symptoms quickly resolved. She delivered a healthy male newborn at 39 weeks' gestation. At birth, the alectinib concentration was 4.3 times higher in maternal plasma than that in newborn plasma (299.0 vs 69.2 ng/mL). The concentrations of alectinib in the amniotic fluid and the placenta were 27.3 ng/mL and 1136.25 ng/g, respectively. The alectinib concentration in the maternal milk (152 ng/mL) indicated that this drug could be excreted through the breast milk. At 12 months after the diagnosis, the mother had recovered well, and no developmental anomalies were observed in the infant.

Alectinib - induced acute renal failure

Introduction: Alectinib is a potent and selective orally active tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer, which has a better safety profile than other inhibitors of anaplastic lymphoma kinase. We report a case of a mixed pattern of acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis proven by renal biopsy upon starting alectinib therapy. Case report: A 68-year-old man with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia, diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer stage IV, had 27 days previously started alectinib 600 mg twice daily. He presented at the emergency room due to vomiting, nausea, and more dyspnoea than usual. A high creatinine level and metabolic imbalances were detected in laboratory tests. Management and outcomes: After a diagnosis of acute renal failure, the patient was admitted to hospital. Nephrotoxic drugs were suspended, and haemodialysis was required. After dismissing other causes, a probable diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis due to alectinib was established. Corticotherapy was initiated and renal function returned to baseline levels. Renal biopsy showed a mixed pattern of acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis. The patient was discharged, and alectinib therapy was modified to lorlatinib. No polymorphisms were found in a pharmacogenetic test. After 10 months with lorlatinib, renal function remains stable. Discussion: The relationship between acute renal failure and alectinib initiation is considered probable in this patient. Although it is an adverse effect reported in less than 1% of cases, it would be advisable to monitor renal function in this kind of patient.

ALK Deletion Exons 2 to 19: Case Report of a Rare ALK Inhibitor-Responsive Lung Cancer Driver Oncogene

ALK internal deletions of nonkinase domain exons occur in 0.01% of lung cancers with ALK genomic aberrations. We report a lung adenocarcinoma with a previously undescribed somatic ALK deletion of exons 2 to 19 with dramatic and sustained (>23 mo) response to alectinib. Our and other reported cases with ALK nonkinase domain deletions (between introns and exons 1-19) can display positive results in nonsequencing-based lung cancer diagnostic tests (such as immunohistochemistry) used to screen for more common ALK rearrangements. This case report emphasizes that "ALK-driven" lung cancers should be expanded to encompass those harboring not only ALK rearrangements with other genes but also ALK nonkinase domain deletions.

Quantitation of osimertinib, alectinib and lorlatinib in human cerebrospinal fluid by UPLC-MS/MS

Overall survival in metastatic lung cancer has been dramatically improved with the use of small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs). Quantification of SMKI in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be used to assess penetration of these drugs into the central nervous system. This paper describes an ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for quantification of the SMKIs alectinib, lorlatinib and osimertinib in human CSF. Alectinib-d8 and dasatinib-d8 were used as internal standards. Aliquots with 25 µL CSF/30% albumin (9:1,v/v) were mixed with 100 µL internal standard solution consisting of 1 ng/mL dasatinib-d8 and alectinib-d8 in acetonitrile. The analytes were separated by an Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 column (2.1 ×150 mm, 1.8 µm), using gradient elution (ammonium formate pH 4.5, acetonitrile) with a flow rate of 0.400 mL/min. All calibration curves were linear for the concentration range from 2.50 to 250 ng/mL. Within-run and between-run precision varied from 0.72% to 11.7%, with accuracy ranging from 95.3% to 113.2%. For all compounds, a high degree of non-specific binding to the vacutainer was observed. This issue could be countered easily by a combination of pre-coating with BSA solution (30%) in phosphate buffer pH 4.2, and immediate sample mixture with BSA solution after collection. To test the clinical applicability, CSF was collected in seven unique patients using alectinib (n = 1), lorlatinib (n = 2), and osimertinib (n = 4). Measured CSF trough concentrations ranged between 3.37 and 116 ng/mL.

Honeycomb resin-based spin-column solid-phase extraction for efficient determination of alectinib and its metabolite in human urine

Alectinib and its metabolite, M4, have demonstrated a satisfactory clinical therapeutic effect in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Due to individual differences among patients, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for guaranteeing appropriate clinical drug use. To realize TDM for alectinib and its metabolite, M4, a honeycomb phenol-formaldehyde resin (PFR) with excellent hydrophilic properties, abundant adsorption force, and a stable porous structure was synthesized by modifying the porogens F127 and P123. The prepared PFR was employed as an adsorbent in a simple and efficient spin-column solid-phase extraction (SPE) process. A rapid method for detecting alectinib and its metabolite M4 in urine was thereby established. The established method showed a linear range of 0.0200 μg mL^-1-5.00 μg mL^-1 and the recovery range of 98.8-103% for spiked urine samples, with relative standard deviations of ≤ 4.87% (n = 3). Our results proved the practicability of the proposed honeycomb-PFR spin-column SPE method in TDM for alectinib and its metabolite, M4.

Alectinib in a patient with ALK-positive non-small lung cancer unable to swallow capsules

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically in the last decade. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement has been a focus of interest since ALK inhibitors produced outstanding clinical results compared with chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

CASE REPORT

We present the case of a 56-year-old woman with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC and an inability to swallow capsules or tablets. Unfortunately, all ALK inhibitors are capsule or tablet formulations.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

We, therefore, decided to administer alectinib orally by opening the capsules and suspending the contents in water. Clinical imaging performed 12 months after initiating alectinib therapy indicated a complete response (CR). After 54 months of follow-up, CR has been maintained, and oral alectinib therapy has continued with no recurrence of the swallowing disturbance.

DISCUSSION

There are no current guidelines for oral targeted therapy in patients with swallowing disturbance, but alectinib administered orally by opening the capsules and suspending the contents in water can be a treatment option in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and swallowing difficulty.

EML4-ALK rearrangement of lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

Background

Lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L-LCNEC) is a subtype of lung cancer with a low incidence and a high degree of malignancy. For early stage patients, surgical treatment is limited, and the risk of postoperative recurrence is high. For patients with unresectable or advanced disease, platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the mainstay of treatment, but its efficacy is unsatisfactory. L-LCNEC with the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene mutation is very rare and currently has no standard therapy. In this article, we report the case of a locally advanced L-LCNEC patient with ALK mutations who underwent first-line treatment with alectinib.

Case Description

A previously healthy, 46-year-old, non-smoking woman was clinically diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced L-LCNEC. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of the patient's plasma and tumor specimen showed echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML-4) (exon 13)-ALK (exon 20) fusion with a mutation frequency of 14.48% and 15.37%. The patient refused chemotherapy, and received first-line treatment with alectinib 600 mg, bis in die (bid), per day. After taking alectinib for 1 month, the patient's chest enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed a partial response (PR). After 12 months of treatment with alectinib, a radiological evaluation showed that the patient had maintained the PR. A grade 2-3 rash was observed at the beginning of the treatment. After symptomatic treatment, the rash disappeared, and the side effects were fully tolerated. At present, the patient can work normally, has a performance status of 0 and has not experience any major adverse events.

Conclusions

Our case suggests that the first-line use of targeted therapy is also a good choice for L-LCNEC patients of stage III with gene mutations. The side effects are light, the patient can tolerate well, and the quality of life of can be improved.

Alectinib-induced hemolytic anemia

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is an oral anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitor with central nervous system activity. It is currently approved and a preferred first-line option for those with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Alectinib has been shown to cause anemia, usually mild.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of alectinib-induced hemolytic anemia in a patient receiving alectinib as first-line treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient's dose was reduced from 600 mg twice daily to 450 mg twice daily and further down to 300 mg twice daily and eventually discontinued. At that point, the hemoglobin normalized.

DISCUSSION

Our case demonstrates objective evidence for hemolytic anemia induced by alectinib.

Pulmonary Spindle Cell Carcinoma Presenting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement

Pulmonary spindle cell carcinoma is a subtype of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and a very rare tumor type with a poor prognosis. A few case reports have documented patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma with anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement, and the efficacy and outcomes of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors remain unclear. Herein, we present the case of a 60-year-old woman with stage IVB disease who was diagnosed with a metastatic brain tumor. This patient showed high levels of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement and received pembrolizumab as the first-line treatment. Three weeks later, pembrolizumab failed to reduce the size of the primary pulmonary tumor, and the patient's general condition did not improve. The patient received alectinib as the second-line treatment. Two months later, multiple brain metastases were observed. Hence, whole-brain irradiation was performed as treatment for multiple brain metastases, while another anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor was administered; however, both treatments remained ineffective. The patient eventually died 9 months after the initiation of first-line treatment. The present case report describes the therapeutic course of a patient with pulmonary spindle cell carcinoma with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement.

Alectinib as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in the real-world setting: preliminary analysis in a Chinese cohort

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been a major advance in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which have been substantiated in clinical trials. However, real-world data on first-line alectinib in a Chinese patient population are limited.

Methods

We enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated with first-line alectinib at 8 centers in China, including cases with symptomatic or active CNS metastases. Continuation of alectinib was permitted after local or gradual progression at the treating clinician's discretion. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the period from the start of alectinib to discontinuation for any cause including disease progression, death, adverse events and patient's preference. We defined longer EML4-ALK variants as containing EML4 fusions to at least exon 13 and shorter variants had EML4 fusions up to exon 6.

Results

Of the 110 patients included, 26.4% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) ≥2 points. The objective response rate (ORR) was 88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-94.3%] and median tumor shrinkage rate was 60% (range, 0-100%) in patients with target lesions. For patients with measurable central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the CNS-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI: 66.1-99.8%), additionally, 80% (8/10) of patients experienced significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms following alectinib treatment. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and 2-year treatment failure-free rate were 81.1% (95% CI: 71.5-87.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 70.6-88.0%) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 6.4% and only 2 patients (1.8%) permanently discontinued alectinib due to adverse events. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with metastases in ≥3 distant organs and a tumor reduction rate ≤50% demonstrated more unfavorable mPFS than their counterparts. Furthermore, patients carrying longer variants showed superior mPFS to those with shorter variants (not reached vs. 24.2 months, hazard ratio =0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68, P=0.004).

Conclusions

Alectinib showed substantial efficacy and an excellent safety profile in a real-world setting of Chinese patients. Clinical outcomes and long-term survival still require longer follow-up. Tumors with shorter EML4 fusion variants, more extensive metastases and less reduction in tumor lesions may require more aggressive strategies.

Complete pathologic response to short-course neoadjuvant alectinib in mediastinal node positive (N2) ALK rearranged lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection for locally advanced lung cancer has evolved to incorporate systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy +/- immunotherapy +/- radiotherapy. The role of neoadjuvant precision therapies remains understudied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report cases with major and complete pathologic responses to off-label neoadjuvant alectinib.

RESULTS

A case with stage IIIA (cT1b cN2 cM0) EML4-ALK variant 3a/b lung adenocarcinoma received 6 weeks of alectinib followed by R0 left upper lobectomy with complete pathological response (ypT0 ypN0). Another case with stage IIIA (cT3 cN2 cM0) EML4-ALK variant 2 received 12 weeks of alectinib followed by R0 right middle lobectomy with a major pathologic response (ypT1a ypN0) but systemic recurrence 12 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant ALK-directed therapy. Our cases support the completion of ongoing trials (ALINA: NCT03456076 and ALNEO: NCT05015010), and highlight the ability of second generation ALK inhibitors to induce major and complete pathologic responses in the neoadjuvant setting plus the likely role of long-term adjuvant kinase inhibitor therapy to prevent radiographic/clinical recurrence.

Acute kidney injury and long-term renal effects of alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapy with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor alectinib has become standard therapy for selected patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Few data are available on the renal effects of alectinib. We report on a case of acute kidney injury in a patient using alectinib for less than 2 weeks and on serum sodium and creatinine during long-term use of alectinib.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old Asian woman was diagnosed with metastasized non-small cell lung carcinoma (cT4N3M1c, stage IV) with echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement and received alectinib, in two daily doses of 600 mg. Eleven days after the initiation of therapy, she was seen at the emergency department with acute kidney injury. Renal biopsy showed lesions in the proximal tubular epithelial cells. Nine days after alectinib cessation, renal function recovered quickly and reintroduction of alectinib in a reduced dose was tolerated, while withholding metformin, enalapril, and naproxen. In seven other patients, data on estimated glomerular filtration rate showed decreased kidney function at 3 months with stabilization at 6 months. Serum sodium at 3 months increased during alectinib treatment and increased further at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest direct or indirect toxic (proximal) tubulopathy due to alectinib with a good prognosis after cessation. Adverse acute renal effects of alectinib may be prevented by avoiding other medication influencing renal hemodynamics, in particular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Without these co-medications, alectinib could be reintroduced in our patient.

The percentage of ALK-positive cells and the efficacy of first-line alectinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: is it a novel factor for stratification? (Turkish Oncology Group Study)

INTRODUCTION

Alectinib is an effective second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Recent studies demonstrated that the percentage of ALK-positive tumor cells in patient groups receiving crizotinib might affect outcomes. This study aimed to investigate whether the percentage of ALK-positive cells had a predictive effect in patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line Alectinib as ALK-TKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with advanced-stage NSCLC who received alectinib as a first-line ALK-TKI and whose percentage of ALK-positive cells was determined by FISH at 27 different centers. Patients who received any ALK-TKI before alectinib were not included in the study. Patients were separated into two groups according to the median (40%) value of the percentage of ALK-positive cells (high-positive group ≥ 40% and low-positive group < 40%). The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were OS, ORR, and PFS of the subgroups based on different threshold values for the percentage of ALK-positive cells.

RESULTS

211 patients were enrolled (48.3% female, 51.7% male) to study. 37% (n = 78) of the patients had received chemotherapy previously. After a median of 19.4 months of follow-up, the median PFS was not reached in the high-positive group (n = 113), but it was 10.8 months in the low-positive group (n = 98) (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.60, p < 0.001). The median OS in the high-positive group was not reached, whereas it was 22.8 months in the low-positive group (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.63, p < 0.001). ORR was significantly higher in the high-positive group (87.2 vs. 68.5%; p = 0.002). According to the cut-off values of < 20%, 20-39%, 40-59%, and ≥ 60%, the median PFS was 4.5, 17.1, and 26 months, respectively, and could not be reached in the ≥ 60% group.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the efficacy of alectinib varies significantly across patient subgroups with different percentages of ALK-positive cells. If these findings are prospectively validated, the percentage of ALK-positive cells may be used as a stratification factor in randomized trials comparing different ALK-TKIs.

Efficacy of lorlatinib after alectinib-induced interstitial lung disease in a patient with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors are standard therapeutic agents prescribed for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer, and treatment with these agents has been shown to contribute to long-term survival in patients. However, there is no consensus regarding the course of treatment after the onset of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors related drug-induced interstitial lung disease. Here, we present a case of successful lorlatinib treatment after the onset of drug-induced interstitial lung disease caused by alectinib.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 57-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with stage IVB non-small cell lung cancer by bronchoscopy, but gene mutation testing could not be performed because of the small amount of specimen. After diagnosis, first-line therapy with cisplatin/pemetrexed was initiated, but the patient developed renal dysfunction. Bronchoscopy was performed again to guide further treatment, and the non-small cell lung cancer was found to be anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive. Alectinib was started after the onset of progressive disease, but it resulted in drug-induced interstitial lung disease, necessitating alternative treatments. He subsequently received nanoparticle albumin bound paclitaxel, which was halted in view of the renal dysfunction. Thereafter, lorlatinib was administered, which was continued without drug-induced interstitial lung disease relapse.

CONCLUSION

Since alectinib can occasionally cause drug-induced interstitial lung disease, as in the present case, lorlatinib may be an option to continue treatment in patients without other treatment alternatives.

Brief Report: Safety and Antitumor Activity of Alectinib Plus Atezolizumab From a Phase 1b Study in Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC

Introduction

Alectinib is a preferred first-line treatment option for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Combination regimens of alectinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated for synergistic effects.

Methods

Adults with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, or recurrent ALK-positive NSCLC were enrolled into a two-stage phase 1b study. Patients received alectinib 600 mg (twice daily during cycle 1 and throughout each 21-d cycle thereafter) plus atezolizumab 1200 mg (d8 of cycle 1 and then d1 of each 21-d cycle). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability of alectinib plus atezolizumab. Secondary objectives included assessments of antitumor activity.

Results

In total, 21 patients received more than or equal to 1 dose of alectinib or atezolizumab. As no dose-limiting toxicities were observed in stage 1 (n = 7), the starting dose and schedule were continued into stage 2 (n = 14). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (range: 1-39). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57% of the patients, most often rash (19%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported. Confirmed objective response rate was 86% (18 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-97). Median progression-free survival was not estimable (NE) (95% CI: 13 mo-NE), neither was median overall survival (95% CI: 33 mo-NE).

Conclusions

The combination of alectinib and atezolizumab is feasible, but increased toxicity was found compared with the individual agents. With small sample sizes and relatively short follow-up, definitive conclusions regarding antitumor activity cannot be made.

Evaluation of Lung Toxicity Related to the Treatment With Alectinib Using a Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND/AIM

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor alectinib is recommended as a first-line treatment for ALK lung cancer. Interstitial lung disease is the most common adverse event leading to discontinuation of alectinib. The purpose of this study was to use the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database for the evaluation of incidence trends and timing of alectinib toxicity in the lungs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by alectinib were extracted between April 2004 and March 2021. Data related to lung toxicity ADRs were analyzed, and the relative risk was estimated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The time of onset of the lung toxicity signs was noted.

RESULTS

We obtained 524 reports of ADRs associated with alectinib. Of these, 157 were lung toxicity, including interstitial lung disease, lung disorder, pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema. The RORs for these signs were 10.28 (95%CI=8.38-12.60), 9.19 (5.58-15.13), 7.40 (3.67-14.88), and 7.01 (3.13-15.69), respectively. The median onset times (quartiles, 25-75%) of interstitial lung disease, lung disorder, pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema associated with alectinib treatment were 92 (36-195), 57 (51-129), 228 (62-431), and 83 (22-96) days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among the lung toxicity signs, interstitial lung disease had the highest ROR, suggesting a strong causal relationship with alectinib treatment. Interstitial lung disease most frequently developed within 60 days after the start of treatment. These results will be useful for monitoring adverse events associated with the use of alectinib.

Dramatic response to alectinib in a lung adenocarcinoma patient harboring a Novel SSFA2-ALK fusion

ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) gene rearrangements have been reported in 3-5% of NSCLC patients. Different ALK fusion forms can mediate different downstream signaling pathways and may exhibit different sensitivities to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To identify more fusion partners that are sensitive to ALK-TKIs, we present a case of 46-year-old woman with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. NGS panel analysis suggested that a novel SSFA2-ALK fusion was identified in this patient. Moreover, this fusion was validated through IHC (VENTANA ALK (D5F3) antibody) and FISH (ZytoLight ALK Break Apart FISH Probe). Importantly, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report about SSFA2-ALK fusion in solid cancers. Moreover, the patient achieved an admirable response to alectinib, with a clinical evaluation of complete response (CR). In summary, our findings expand the spectrum of ALK fusion patterns and provide robust evidence for the precise administration of alectinib in the future.

A novel alectinib-sensitive CTNND1-ALK fusion in a lung adenocarcinoma patient: a case report

Genomic fusions of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are a well-established therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although various ALK fusion variants have been identified in NSCLC, their responses to ALK tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are heterogeneous. We report the case of a 71-year-old female patient diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with liver metastases. A novel CTNND1 (exon 14)-ALK (exon 20) fusion was identified from the biopsy sample by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Alectinib was administered, and the patient soon achieved partial response (PR). The progression-free survival (PFS) exceeded 15 months as of January 25, 2022. Our findings expand the spectrum of ALK rearrangements and provide a potential treatment option for lung adenocarcinoma patients with CTNND1-ALK fusions.

Successful salvage surgery followed by second ALK-TKI after alectinib failure in a patient with ALK-positive NSCLC

Background

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for the therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) caused by ALK rearrangement. However, its treatment after failure of initial ALK–TKI therapy remains controversial.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old woman with a hemosputum was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the left lung (cT2bN3M0, stage IIIB). Gene mutation analysis indicated positive ALK translocation. Alectinib was selected as the first-line treatment. Although the treatment effect was determined as a partial response, the main tumor regrew. Alectinib was discontinued, and salvage surgery was performed without causing morbidity. The pathological diagnosis was pleomorphic carcinoma without lymph node metastasis (yp-T2bN0). After surgery, lorlatinib was administered as the second-line treatment for 8 months until the patient could not tolerate continuation. Computed tomography scan revealed no lung cancer recurrence 14 months after discontinuation.

Conclusions

Our experience with this case suggests that salvage surgery after alectinib treatment followed by lorlatinib therapy may be effective for initially unresectable ALK-positive NSCLC.

Influence of alectinib and crizotinib on ionizing radiation - in vitro analysis of ALK/ROS1-wildtype lung tissue cells

(1) Background: Just little is known about the interaction of ALK/ROS1-targeting kinase inhibitors with ionizing radiation (IR), particularly regarding side effects. We investigated the toxicity in two different lung cell lines both ALK/ROS1 wildtype (healthy and tumor origin) as representatives for normal lung tissue; (2) Methods: Human lung cell line BEAS-2B and malignant A549 lung cancer cells (ALK/ROS1 wt) were treated with alectinib or crizotinib, 2 Gy irradiation or a combination of KI and IR. Cell toxicity was analyzed by cell death (Annexin, 7AAD), colony forming, migration assay and live-cell imaging (TMRM, DRAQ7, Caspase3/7). Cell cycle (Hoechst) were analyzed by flow cytometry; (3) Results: Crizotinib led to higher cell death rates than alectinib, when cells were treated with 10 µM KI. Alectinib induced a more intense growth inhibition of colonies. Both inhibitors showed additive effects in combination with irradiation. Combination treatment (IR + KI) does not lead to synergistic effect on neither cell death nor colony forming; (4) Conclusions: The influence of simultaneous KI and IR was studied in non-mutated ALK/ROS1 cell lines. Both KIs seems to be well tolerated in combination with thoracic radiotherapy and lacked synergistic reinforcement in cellular toxicity. This supports the feasibility of ALK/ROS1 inhibition in combination with thoracic irradiation in future clinical trials.